Abstract
The International Symposium ‘Microbial Growth and Behavior: From Bench to Nature’ was held as part of the annual meeting of the Society for Genome Microbiology, Japan. This session was designed to highlight challenges in modern microbiology: how to connect molecular insights obtained from laboratory model systems with the dynamic and complex responses of microbes in natural environments.
Keywords: genome-based microbiology, microbial physiology, genomics and metagenomics
1. Introduction
For decades, classical microbiology performed under controlled culture conditions has elucidated fundamental principles of cell growth, stress signalling, chromosome dynamics, and regulatory networks, creating the foundation of modern molecular biology.1–6 However, natural environments expose microbes to fluctuating resources, spatial heterogeneity, multicellular interactions, and ecological pressures that are often difficult to recapitulate in the laboratory. Understanding how microbial cells behave under complex conditions requires bridging laboratory precision with ecological realism.
One of the reasons microbiology is expanding from a laboratory-based discipline towards a science that embraces natural and ecological complexity is the remarkable advance in genomics. High-throughput sequencing techniques have transformed phylogeny, enabling unprecedented resolution of evolutionary relationships across bacteria, archaea, and phages.7–11 Long-read sequencing technologies have also revealed epigenetic and epitranscriptomic regulatory mechanisms that influence diverse cellular processes in bacteria.12–15 Furthermore, sequence-based technologies such as ChIP-seq,16–18 Hi-C,19–21 and transposon mapping22–25 have enabled genome-wide analyses of protein–DNA/RNA interactions, chromosome organization, and gene essentiality. More recently, single-cell transcriptomic approaches, which have flourished in eukaryotic systems, are becoming feasible in prokaryotic organisms, offering new opportunities to investigate regulatory programmes at the level of individual cells and their cell-to-cell variations.26–31 Collectively, the insights emerging from genome-based microbiology have uncovered important regulatory layers that extend far beyond the genetic code.
Even more transformative has been the rise of metagenomic approaches, which allow researchers to directly sequence microbial communities and viral populations in natural environments.32–34 Metagenomics has led to the discovery of countless new species, novel metabolic pathways, and unexpected ecological interactions, as well as proteins whose biochemical properties are still unknown.35–39 These findings have also revealed extensive horizontal gene transfer and auxiliary metabolic genes carried by phages, which influence host evolution, physiology, and ecosystem functions.40 Collectively, these approaches have opened new perspectives on microbial evolution, horizontal gene flow, and the ecological strategies that microbes employ in diverse habitats, ranging from soil and freshwater to the human body and extreme environments.
Together, these genome-driven approaches have greatly expanded our view of microbial diversity and provided new insight into how microbial systems operate. They have also provided the essential context for integrating laboratory findings with ecological and host-associated biology. In this spirit, the symposium brought together researchers whose work exemplifies this integration spanning cytotoxic stress responses, morphological transitions, host-relevant social behaviours, and environmental sensory systems. Their presentations illustrated how molecular mechanisms discovered at the bench can explain microbial strategies in natural environments, and how environmental complexity, in turn, enriches and challenges our mechanistic understanding.
Dr. Setsu Kato from Hiroshima University presented state-of-the-art single-cell imaging approaches to dissect the cytotoxic effects of alcohol on Escherichia coli.41,42 Her work highlighted the remarkable cell-to-cell heterogeneity in subcellular dynamics and the timing of responses to cytotoxic stress. By resolving damage responses at the level of individual cells, she is uncovering how distinct stress-induced events are orchestrated within the microbial population.
Dr. Daisuke Shiomi from Rikkyo University discussed the physiology of E. coli L-forms, focusing on their unique cell-wall-deficient state.43,44 His talk emphasized the crucial role of chromosome dynamics in enabling L-forms to revert to the canonical rod-shaped lifestyle. This work provides important mechanistic insight into cellular plasticity and survival strategies under cell-wall-compromised conditions, which are frequently encountered by microbes in nature such as during host infection.
Dr. Urs Jenal from University of Basel used Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a model to illustrate how bacteria coordinate division of labour to optimize surface colonization.45,46 He first demonstrated in controlled laboratory settings that the second messengers c-di-GMP and cAMP govern cellular programmes to coordinate colonization efficiency. In particular, this coordination enables asymmetric daughter-cell fates following division: one daughter cell remains attached to the surface whereas the other disperses to explore new environments, thereby generating a division of labour that promotes efficient colonization. He then expanded these findings to human lung tissue infection models, revealing that the same regulatory principles operate in host environments, underscoring the ecological and clinical relevance of the mechanistic framework.
Dr. Gen Enomoto from Tokyo University of Agriculture presented elegant studies using cyanobacterial species to explore how these cells perceive and integrate different wavelengths of light to regulate motility and attachment.47,48 By sampling cyanobacteria from natural habitats and examining their behaviours under controlled laboratory conditions, his work provides a compelling example of how field-derived microbial diversity can illuminate adaptive strategies for life in fluctuating light environments.
2. Concluding remarks
A recurring message that now defines the Society for Genome Microbiology, Japan is that true progress in genome-based microbiology depends on iterative experimental cycles between environments and laboratories. Natural environments reveal the authentic selective pressures, ecological constraints, and evolutionary innovations that shape microbial genomes. Laboratory systems, in turn, provide the resolution necessary to mechanistically decode these discoveries at the molecular level. When researchers bring environmental or clinical isolates into the lab, test genome-derived hypotheses under controlled conditions, and then return to natural environments to validate and refine their findings, a powerful feedback loop emerges. This back-and-forth movement not only deepens our understanding of microbial physiology and evolution but also ensures that genome-driven discoveries remain grounded in reality. Genome technologies continue to advance and will be essential for the next generation of genome microbiology, one that plays an indispensable role within the broader field of general microbiology, where molecular precision and ecological relevance meet.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the support from Kazusa DNA Research Institute and Ohsumi Frontier Science Foundation Microbial Consortium. We thank all participants of the symposium for their excellent contributions. We also thank Drs. Setsu Kato, Daisuke Shiomi, Urs Jenal, and Gen Enomoto for reviewing the draft and for their helpful comments.
Contributor Information
Shogo Ozaki, Department of Molecular Biology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Satoru Watanabe, Department of Bioscience, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan.
Taku Oshima, Department of Biotechnology, Toyama Prefectural University, Toyama 939-0398, Japan.
Funding
None declared.
References
- 1. Laventie B-J, Jenal U. Surface sensing and adaptation in Bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2020:74:735–760. 10.1146/annurev-micro-012120-063427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Lioy VS, Junier I, Boccard F. Multiscale dynamic structuring of bacterial chromosomes. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2021:75:541–561. 10.1146/annurev-micro-033021-113232 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Cameron TA, Margolin W. Insights into the assembly and regulation of the bacterial divisome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2024:22:33–45. 10.1038/s41579-023-00942-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Gruber TM, Gross CA. Multiple sigma subunits and the partitioning of bacterial transcription space. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2003:57:441–466. 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Jun S, Si F, Pugatch R, Scott M. Fundamental principles in bacterial physiology—history, recent progress, and the future with focus on cell size control: a review. Rep Prog Phys. 2018:81:056601. 10.1088/1361-6633/aaa628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kasho K, Ozaki S, Katayama T. IHF and fis as Escherichia coli cell cycle regulators: activation of the replication origin oriC and the regulatory cycle of the DnaA initiator. Int J Mol Sci. 2023:24:11572. 10.3390/ijms241411572 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Zhu Q et al. Phylogenomics of 10,575 genomes reveals evolutionary proximity between domains Bacteria and Archaea. Nat Commun. 2019:10:5477. 10.1038/s41467-019-13443-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Coleman GA et al. A rooted phylogeny resolves early bacterial evolution. Science. 2021:372:eabe0511. 10.1126/science.abe0511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Parks DH et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol. 2018:36:996–1004. 10.1038/nbt.4229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hug LA et al. A new view of the tree of life. Nat Microbiol. 2016:1:16048. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Williams TA et al. Phylogenetic reconciliation: making the most of genomes to understand microbial ecology and evolution. ISME J. 2024:18:129. 10.1093/ismejo/wrae129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Mruk I, Kobayashi I. To be or not to be: regulation of restriction–modification systems and other toxin–antitoxin systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014:42:70–86. 10.1093/nar/gkt711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Sharaf S, Cappelletti M, Oggioni MR, Hijazi K. Epigenetic regulation in prokaryotes: transcriptional and phenotypic outcomes of DNA methyltransferase activity. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2026:50:fuag014. 10.1093/femsre/fuag014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Sánchez-Romero MA, Casadesús J. The bacterial epigenome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020:18:7–20. 10.1038/s41579-019-0286-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Schmidt N et al. Epigenetic control of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis by m4C DNA methylation in a cyanobacterium. DNA Res. 2024:31:35. 10.1093/dnares/dsae035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ozaki S, Jenal U, Katayama T. Novel divisome-associated protein spatially coupling the Z-ring with the chromosomal replication terminus in Caulobacter crescentus. mBio. 2020:11:e00487-20. 10.1128/mBio.00487-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Chumsakul O et al. High-resolution mapping of in vivo genomic transcription factor binding sites using in situ DNase I footprinting and ChIP-seq. DNA Res. 2013:20:325–338. 10.1093/dnares/dst013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Nakahigashi K et al. Comprehensive identification of translation start sites by tetracycline-inhibited ribosome profiling. DNA Res. 2016:23:193–201. 10.1093/dnares/dsw008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Takemata N, Samson RY, Bell SD. Physical and functional compartmentalization of archaeal chromosomes. Cell. 2019:179:165–179.e18. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Lioy VS et al. Multiscale structuring of the E. coli chromosome by nucleoid-associated and condensin proteins. Cell. 2018:172:771–783.e18. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Le TBK, Imakaev MV, Mirny LA, Laub MT. High-resolution mapping of the spatial organization of a bacterial chromosome. Science. 2013:342:731–734. 10.1126/science.1242059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. van Opijnen T, Bodi KL, Camilli A. Tn-seq: high-throughput parallel sequencing for fitness and genetic interaction studies in microorganisms. Nat Methods. 2009:6:767–772. 10.1038/nmeth.1377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zik JJ et al. Dual transposon sequencing profiles the genetic interaction landscape in bacteria. Science. 2025:389:eadt7685. 10.1126/science.adt7685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Goodman AL et al. Identifying genetic determinants needed to establish a human gut symbiont in its habitat. Cell Host Microbe. 2009:6:279–289. 10.1016/j.chom.2009.08.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Gawronski JD, Wong SMS, Giannoukos G, Ward DV, Akerley BJ. Tracking insertion mutants within libraries by deep sequencing and a genome-wide screen for Haemophilus genes required in the lung. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009:106:16422–16427. 10.1073/pnas.0906627106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Sarfatis A, Wang Y, Twumasi-Ankrah N, Moffitt JR. Highly multiplexed spatial transcriptomics in bacteria. Science. 2025:387:eadr0932. 10.1126/science.adr0932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Kuchina A et al. Microbial single-cell RNA sequencing by split-pool barcoding. Science. 2021:371:eaba5257. 10.1126/science.aba5257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. McNulty R et al. Probe-based bacterial single-cell RNA sequencing predicts toxin regulation. Nat Microbiol. 2023:8:934–945. 10.1038/s41564-023-01348-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ma P et al. Bacterial droplet-based single-cell RNA-Seq reveals antibiotic-associated heterogeneous cellular states. Cell. 2023:186:877–891.e14. 10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Blattman SB, Jiang W, Oikonomou P, Tavazoie S. Prokaryotic single-cell RNA sequencing by in situ combinatorial indexing. Nat Microbiol. 2020:5:1192–1201. 10.1038/s41564-020-0729-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Imdahl F, Vafadarnejad E, Homberger C, Saliba A-E, Vogel J. Single-cell RNA-Sequencing reports growth-condition-specific global transcriptomes of individual bacteria. Nat Microbiol. 2020:5:1202–1206. 10.1038/s41564-020-0774-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Mori H et al. Microbiome Datahub: an open-access platform integrating environmental metadata, taxonomy, and functional annotation for comprehensive metagenome-assembled genome datasets. Microbiome. 2026:14:119. 10.1186/s40168-026-02385-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Nishimura Y, Yoshizawa S. The OceanDNA MAG catalog contains over 50,000 prokaryotic genomes originated from various marine environments. Sci Data. 2022:9:305. 10.1038/s41597-022-01392-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Handelsman J. Metagenomics: application of genomics to uncultured microorganisms. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004:68:669–685. 10.1128/MMBR.68.4.669-685.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Tominaga K et al. Frequent nonhomologous replacement of replicative helicase loaders by viruses in Vibrionaceae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024:121:e2317954121. 10.1073/pnas.2317954121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Medvedeva S et al. Three families of asgard archaeal viruses identified in metagenome-assembled genomes. Nat Microbiol. 2022:7:962–973. 10.1038/s41564-022-01144-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Matias Rodrigues JF et al. The MicrobeAtlas database: global trends and insights into Earth’s microbial ecosystems. Cell. 2026:189:2092–2107.e17. 10.1016/j.cell.2026.01.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Kim CY et al. Planetary microbiome structure and generalist-driven gene flow across disparate habitats. Cell. 2026:189:2073–2091.e21. 10.1016/j.cell.2025.12.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Kurokawa M et al. Metagenomic thermometer. DNA Res. 2023:30:1–10. 10.1093/dnares/dsad024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Chevallereau A, Pons BJ, van Houte S, Westra ER. Interactions between bacterial and phage communities in natural environments. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022:20:49–62. 10.1038/s41579-021-00602-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Kato S et al. Single-cell time-lapse observation reveals cell shrinkage upon cell death in batch culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. mBio. 2021:12:e0309421. 10.1128/mBio.03094-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Campos M et al. A constant size extension drives bacterial cell size homeostasis. Cell. 2014:159:1433–1446. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Chikada T et al. Direct observation of conversion from walled cells to wall-deficient L-form and Vice Versa in Escherichia coli indicates the essentiality of the outer membrane for proliferation of L-form cells. Front Microbiol. 2021:12:645965. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.645965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Hayashi M et al. Septal wall synthesis is sufficient to change ameba-like cells into uniform oval-shaped cells in Escherichia coli L-forms. Commun Biol. 2024:7:1569. 10.1038/s42003-024-07279-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Laventie B-J et al. A surface-induced asymmetric program promotes tissue colonization by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cell Host Microbe. 2019:25:140–152.e6. 10.1016/j.chom.2018.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Swart AL et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa breaches respiratory epithelia through goblet cell invasion in a microtissue model. Nat Microbiol. 2024:9:1725–1737. 10.1038/s41564-024-01718-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Enomoto G, Wallner T, Wilde A. Control of light-dependent behaviour in cyanobacteria by the second messenger cyclic di-GMP. Microlife. 2023:4:uqad019. 10.1093/femsml/uqad019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Nakane D et al. Thermosynechococcus switches the direction of phototaxis by a c-di-GMP-dependent process with high spatial resolution. eLife. 2022:11:e73405. 10.7554/eLife.73405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
