Skip to main content
Bentham Open Access logoLink to Bentham Open Access
. 2025 Oct 7;32(29):2450–2459. doi: 10.2174/0113816128385046250912044104

Predictive Value of 48-hour Anion Gap Fluctuations in ICU Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: An Analysis based on MIMIC Database

Liling Hu 1, Shiva Khoshravesh 2, Qingquan Liu 3,*
PMCID: PMC13678608  PMID: 41088917

Abstract

Introduction

Increasing anion gap (AG) correlates with both short- and long-term mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the relationship between AG fluctuations and AKI prognosis has been understudied. This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of AG fluctuations within the first 48 hours after ICU admission for renal recovery and 30-day all-cause mortality in AKI patients.

Methods

Data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV, v2.2) database, including AKI patients aged 18 and older. A multifactorial Cox regression model was employed to assess the impact of AG fluctuations within 48 hours of ICU admission on mortality, adjusted using five models. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and curve-fitting analysis were used to illustrate the relationship between AG fluctuations and mortality risk.

Results

A total of 15,438 patients with AKI were included, 57.0% of whom were male. The 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 19.19%. Patients were categorized into three groups based on AG fluctuations within the first 48 hours: <3 mmol/L, 3-5 mmol/L, and >5 mmol/L. Cox regression and survival analysis indicated a significantly higher 30-day mortality rate in the >5 mmol/L group (HR = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.50-1.77, P< 0.001), with the worst prognosis. Restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a nonlinear relationship between AG fluctuations and 30-day mortality risk.

Discussion

The findings suggest that AG fluctuations during the first 48 hours of ICU admission are closely associated with adverse outcomes in AKI patients. Monitoring AG dynamics may aid clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and enhancing patient management by allowing for timely interventions that may improve prognosis.

Conclusion

AG fluctuations within the first 48 hours of ICU admission are a key predictor of renal recovery and 30-day mortality in AKI patients. AG fluctuations greater than 5 mmol/L are significantly associated with increased mortality risk.

Keywords: Anion gap, acute kidney injury, mortality, MIMIC database, intensive care unit, hypertension

1. INTRODUCTION

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a prevalent and serious complication in clinical practice, characterized by high incidence and mortality rates. Its impact is particularly significant in the intensive care unit (ICU), where severe AKI is associated with a notably elevated mortality rate [1, 2]. Epidemiological data suggest that AKI affects 10% to 20% of hospitalized patients, but this incidence can rise dramatically in ICU settings, reaching up to 50% or more [3, 4]. AKI is linked to a higher demand for renal replacement therapy, longer hospital stays, increased healthcare costs, and greater mortality both during hospitalization and after discharge [5, 6]. A meta-analysis has reported that the overall mortality rate in AKI patients is 23% [7], while large-scale prognostic studies reveal that AKI patients experience twice the annual mortality rate of those without AKI after discharge [8]. The etiology of AKI is highly heterogeneous, with significant variability in its incidence, underlying causes, and pathophysiology, particularly in ICU patients who often present with multiple comorbidities [9, 10]. Various prognostic markers have been proposed to predict AKI outcomes, including serum potassium, creatinine, cystatin C, and KIM-1, along with the RIFLE classification system for AKI [11-14]. Despite these efforts, no consensus has emerged regarding a definitive prognostic model.

The anion gap (AG), a calculated parameter widely used in diagnosing metabolic acidosis, has emerged as a potentially valuable tool for predicting AKI outcomes. Elevated AG levels have been linked to poor prognoses in various conditions such as heart disease, sepsis, and liver failure [15-18]. In AKI patients, particularly those in the ICU, research has demonstrated that elevated AG is a strong predictor of all-cause mortality [19, 20]. Studies involving real-world cohorts have shown that increased AG at ICU admission is associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure or pulmonary hypertension patients with sepsis [19, 21, 22]. However, the relationship between AG fluctuations and AKI prognosis has been understudied. Identifying a reliable, easy-to-measure biomarker that can inform prognosis and guide clinical decision-making would represent a major step forward in the management of AKI.

The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) database, a comprehensive repository of ICU patient data, provides an invaluable resource for investigating critical care outcomes, treatment strategies, and prognostic factors [23, 24]. This study aims to explore the clinical relevance of AG fluctuations during the first 48 hours of ICU admission and their association with renal recovery and 30-day mortality in AKI patients.

2. METHODS

2.1. Data Source

The data in this study were all obtained from the MIMIC-IV v2.2 database, which is the result of a collaboration between Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC, Boston, Massachusetts, USA) and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The database contains 431,231 admission records and 73,181 ICU admission records from 2008 to 2019. This comprehensive database was compiled by a collaborative consortium that includes the Laboratory of Computational Physiology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, and Philips Healthcare [25]. Supported by substantial funding from the National Institutes of Health, the project underwent rigorous ethical review and approval from relevant Institutional Review Boards. The database represents a concerted effort to advance critical care research through the aggregation and detailed analysis of extensive clinical data. Personnel involved in data extraction were required to undergo specialized training and obtain certification (ID: 51474658) for database access and data retrieval. PostgreSQL software was utilized to interact with the MIMIC-IV database, and all data were extracted using structured query language (SQL) code [26]. The research was conducted in strict accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Patient Selection

The study cohort was composed of adult patients (aged 18 years and older) diagnosed with AKI according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines [27]. All patients included in the study were admitted to the ICU for more than 48 hours. Exclusion criteria included patients with multiple ICU admissions, those who died within 48 hours of admission, and those with incomplete essential data. This stringent selection process ensured the integrity of the dataset, and the patient recruitment process is outlined in Fig. (1).

Fig. (1).

Fig. (1)

Flow chart for participant inclusion and exclusion. MIMIC III: Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care Database III; ICU: intensive care unit.

2.3. Data Extraction

AG fluctuation was defined as the difference between the highest and lowest anion gap (AG) values within the first 48 hours of ICU admission. Patients were categorized into three groups based on tertiles of AG fluctuation during this time period: Low AG fluctuation: < 3 mmol/L, Moderate AG fluctuation: 3-5 mmol/L, High AG fluctuation: > 5 mmol/L [28]. AG were calculated using the formulae: AG (mmol/l) = (sodium + potassium) - (chloride + bicarbonate) [29, 30]. The albumin-corrected anion gap (ACAG) was determined using the formula: ACAG (mmol/l)=[4.4-albumin (g/dl)]×2.5+AG [29, 31]. Kidney function recovery was assessed by analyzing discharge urine output (UO) and serum creatinine (SCr) values from the MIMIC-IV database. Recovery of renal function was defined as SCr at discharge being ≤ 1.5 times the baseline value and UO greater than 0.5 ml/kg/h within 24 hours before discharge [32, 33].

2.4. Outcomes

The primary outcomes of the study were renal function recovery and 30-day all-cause mortality. Five statistical models were applied to assess these outcomes: Model 1: Unadjusted (no control for confounders). Model 2: Adjusted for demographic factors such as age, sex, and race. Model 3: Further adjusted for clinical factors including systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, hemoglobin, creatinine, and platelet levels. Model 4: Additional adjustments for comorbidities: SOFA score, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, diabetes, liver disease, chronic kidney disease, malignant tumors, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and sepsis. Model 5: Built upon Model 4 by adjusting for bicarbonate, blood glucose, blood calcium, blood potassium, blood sodium, and blood chloride levels.

2.5. Statistical Methods

Statistical analysis was conducted using R version 4.3.3. Continuous variables with normal distribution were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), while non-normally distributed variables were expressed as median (interquartile range). Categorical data were reported as percentages. Since less than 1% of the data were missing, mean imputation was employed to handle missing values. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between AG fluctuations within the first 48 hours of ICU admission and the primary outcomes (renal function recovery and 30-day all-cause mortality). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to analyze the impact of AG fluctuations on 30-day mortality. The correlation between the AG fluctuations in AKI patients and the risk of 30-day all-cause mortality was further explored using restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis [34, 35]. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Comparison of Clinical Baseline Characteristics

A total of 15,438 adult patients with AKI in the ICU were enrolled in the study. The median AG fluctuation was 4 mmol/L (range 2-6 mmol/L). The average age of the patients was 67.8 ± 15.6 years, with males comprising 57.0% (8,797 patients). AKI stage 3 had the highest prevalence, accounting for 33% of the cohort. Platelet counts showed a progressive decline across the three groups, while SOFA scores increased correspondingly. The proportion of patients with myocardial infarction and liver disease was higher in the group with the greatest AG fluctuations. No significant differences were observed in hospital stay duration or renal function recovery among the groups. However, the 30-day mortality rate varied significantly between the groups (p < 0.001), as shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Population characteristics of AKI patients grouped by different AG fluctuation values.

Variables AG Fluctuation Values (mmol/L) P-value
<3 (n=6904) 3-5 (n=4237) >5 (n=4297)
Gender, n (%) - - - 0.034
Female 3048 (44.1%) 1795 (42.4%) 1798 (41.8%) -
Male 3856 (55.9%) 2442 (57.6%) 2499 (58.2%) -
Age (years) 69.1 ± 15.0 68.1 ± 15.6 65.6 ± 16.3 <.001
Race, n (%) - - - <.001
Asians 142 (2.1%) 82 (1.9%) 129 (3%) -
Black 541 (7.8%) 350 (8.3%) 390 (9.1%) -
Hispanic 195 (2.8%) 123 (2.9%) 138 (3.2%) -
White 4824 (69.9%) 2825 (66.7%) 2745 (63.9%) -
Other Race 248 (3.6%) 169 (4%) 186 (4.3%) -
Unknown 954 (13.8%) 688 (16.2%) 709 (16.5%) -
AKI Staging - - - <.001
1 1833 (26.5%) 1093 (25.8%) 974 (22.7%) -
2 3794 (55%) 2146 (50.6%) 1906 (44.4%) -
3 1277 (18.5%) 998 (23.6%) 1417 (33%) -
Systolic pressure, mmHg 117.6 ± 15.3 116.2 ± 15.1 114.8 ± 14.9 <.001
Diastolic pressure, mmHg 61.6 ± 11.8 61.9 ± 12.6 62.4 ± 12.2 0.008
SOFA score 5 (3~8) 6 (4~9) 8 (5~11) <.001
Laboratory Parameters
Creatinine, mg/dl 0.7(0.6~1) 0.8(0.6~1) 0.8(0.6~1.05) <.001
Urea nitrogen, mg/dl 18 (13~28) 19(13~32) 21(14~35) <.001
Hematocrit, % 30.4 ± 7.9 30.0 ± 7.1 29.8 ± 7.5 <.001
Hemoglobin, g/dL 9.8 (8.4~11.5) 9.7 (8.3~11.4) 9.7(8.1~11.5) 0.001
Platelet, ×109/L 171(122~231) 164 (114~227) 152 (100~214) <.001
Leukocyte, ×109/L 9.7(7.2~12.83) 9.9 (7~13.3) 9.8 (7~13.3) 0.934
Bicarbonate, mmol/L 22.8 ± 6.7 21.4 ± 4.1 19.0 ± 4.6 <.001
Sodium ion, mmol/L 137.3 ± 4.2 136.7 ± 4.5 136.2 ± 5.2 <.001
Potassium, mmol/L 4.0 ± 0.5 3.9 ± 0.6 3.9 ± 0.6 <.001
Serum calcium, mmol/L 2.1 (2.0~2.2) 2.0 (1.9~2.2) 2.0 (1.8~2.1) <.001
Chloride ion, mmol/L 102.9 ± 5.7 102.1 ± 5.8 101.2 ± 6.4 <.001
Glucose, mg/dL 119.6 ± 31.6 119.2 ± 32.8 119.6 ± 36.6 0.792
Fluctuation value of AG over 48 hours, mmol/L 2.0 ± 1.0 4.4 ± 0.5 8.2 ± 2.5 <.001
Urine volume, mL 1370(900~2010) 1345(835~2045) 1229(687~1995) <.001
Comorbidities
Myocardial infarction 1329 (19.2%) 845 (19.9%) 910 (21.2%) 0.046
Heart failure 2219 (32.1%) 1487 (35.1%) 1469 (34.2%) 0.003
COPD 1962 (28.4%) 1152 (27.2%) 1080 (25.1%) <.001
CKD 1503 (21.8%) 991 (23.4%) 1035 (24.1%) 0.011
Malignancy 847 (12.3%) 587 (13.9%) 567 (13.2%) 0.046
Diabetes 2117 (30.7%) 1293 (30.5%) 1450 (33.7%) <.001
Liver disease 688 (10%) 605 (14.3%) 854 (19.9%) <.001
Sepsis 4312 (62.5%) 2856 (67.4%) 3248 (75.6%) <.001
Total length of hospitalization, days 8.99 (6.1014.7) 10.19 (6.63~16.70) 10.82 (6.76~18.66) <.001
Length of ICU hospitalization, days 3.63 (2.61~6) 4(2.78~7.11) 4.6(3~8.76) <.001
Recovery of renal function, n (%) 3527 (51.1%) 2025 (47.8%) 1855 (43.2%) <.001
30-day mortality rate 1114 (16.1%) 790 (18.6%) 1058 (24.6%) <.001

Abbreviations: AKI: acute kidney injury, CKD: Chronic kidney disease, MIMIC-IV: Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV, AG: anion gap, COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ICU: intensive care unit, SOFA: sequential organ failure assessment.

3.2. Relationship Between AG Fluctuation and Renal Function Recovery and 30-Day Mortality in AKI Patients

In the univariate analysis, AG fluctuation greater than 5 mmol/L was found to be a risk factor for renal function recovery (HR = 0.73, p < 0.05) and 30-day all-cause mortality (HR = 1.63, p < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis, adjusting for confounding factors such as age, sex, race, and comorbidities, confirmed the significance of AG fluctuations with respect to renal function recovery (HR = 0.80, p < 0.05) and 30-day mortality (HR = 1.47, p < 0.05). However, after further adjustment for ionic concentrations in the blood (Model 5), AG fluctuations were no longer associated with these outcomes, as presented in Table 2. Furthermore, we also evaluated whether ACAG fluctuations within 48 hours were independent risk factors for renal function recovery and 30-day mortality. Due to the absence of albumin values in 7,636 AKI patients, AVAG analysis was only conducted in 7,802 AKI patients. After conducting univariate and multivariate Cox analyses, we found that the results obtained by ACAG as an independent factor were consistent with those obtained by AG as an independent factor (Table S1 (953.4KB, pdf) ), This indicated that the results obtained by taking AG as the subject of the study were robust.

Table 2. Regression analysis of AG fluctuation within 48 hours with renal function recovery and 30-day mortality rate.

Characteristics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Renal Function Recovery
Fluctuation value of AG (mmol/L) 0.95 (0.94-0.96) <0.001 0.95 (0.94-0.96) <0.001 0.95 (0.94-0.96) <0.001 0.97 (0.96-0.98) <0.001 1.00 (0.99-1.01) 0.968
Fluctuation value of AG (mmol/L) - - - - - - - - - -
<3 (Ref) (Ref) (Ref) (Ref) (Ref) -
3-5 0.88 (0.81-0.95) <0.001 0.88 (0.81-0.95) <0.001 0.89 (0.83-0.97) 0.004 0.93 (0.86-1.00) 0.09 1.01 (0.93-1.09) 0.825
>5 0.73 (0.67-0.78) <0.001 0.73 (0.67-0.78) <0.001 0.75 (0.70-0.81) <0.001 0.82 (0.76-0.89) <0.001 1.01 (0.93-1.10) 0.805
30-day Mortality Rate
Fluctuation value of AG (mmol/L) 1.08 (1.06-1.09) <0.001 1.09 (1.08-1.10) <0.001 1.07 (1.06-1.09) <0.001 1.05 (1.04-1.06) <0.001 0.99 (0.98-1.01) 0.313
Fluctuation value of AG (mmol/L) - - - - - - - - - -
<3 (Ref) (Ref) (Ref) (Ref) (Ref)
3-5 1.17 (1.07-1.28) <0.001 1.18 (1.07-1.29) <0.001 1.14 (1.04-1.25) 0.005 1.05 (0.96-1.16) 0.261 0.92 (0.84-1.01) 0.072
>5 1.63 (1.50-1.77) <0.001 1.72 (1.58-1.88) <0.001 1.58 (1.45-1.72) <0.001 1.39 (1.27-1.51) <0.001 0.96 (0.88-1.06) 0.454

Note: Model 1: No control of any confounding factors; Model 2: Controlling for confounding factors: age, gender, race, etc; Model 3: Confounding factors: systolic and diastolic blood pressure, creatinine, hemoglobin and platelets were controlled on the basis of model 2; Model 4: Confounders: SOFA score, myocardial infarction, heart failure, diabetes, liver disease, CKD, COPD, malignancy and sepsis were controlled for in Model III; Model 5: Bicarbonate, glucose, calcium, potassium, sodium, and chloride were adjusted from Model 4.

Abbreviations: Ref: reference, HR: hazard ratio, CI: confidence interval, AG: anion gap, CKD: chronic kidney disease, COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

3.3. Survival Analysis of AKI Patients Within 30 Days Based on AG Fluctuations

Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed according to the tertiles of AG fluctuations. The results indicated that patients with AG fluctuations >5 mmol/L had a significantly lower cumulative 30-day survival rate compared to the other two groups, with a highly significant difference (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2). Moreover, we further analyzed the impact of AG fluctuations on the survival period of AKI patients based on AKI stage or sepsis status. The results indicated that regardless of AKI stage 1, AKI stage 2, or AKI stage 3, the cumulative 30-day survival rate of AKI patients with AG fluctuation >5 mmol/L was significantly lower than that of the other two groups. Similarly, whether it was AKI caused by sepsis or AKI not caused by sepsis, it was found that the survival rate of AKI patients with AG fluctuation >5 mmol/L was decreased significantly (Fig. S1 (953.4KB, pdf) ).

Fig. (2).

Fig. (2)

30-days Kaplan-Meier survival curve of AKI patients in subgroups with different anion gap fluctuations. Abbreviations: AKI: acute kidney injury, AG: anion gap.

3.4. Restricted Cubic Splines Analysis of 30-Day Mortality in AKI Patients Based on AG Fluctuations

To better capture the nonlinear relationship between AG fluctuations and patient outcomes, RCS analysis was performed. Nodes were defined within the data range, and polynomial functions were applied to fit the data between these nodes. The analysis revealed a nonlinear association between AG fluctuation values and the 30-day mortality rate in AKI patients (P non-linear = 0.008), as illustrated in Fig. (3). Furthermore, we found that this nonlinear association this nonlinear relationship is not affected by the stage of AKI and whether AKI was caused by sepsis (Fig. S2 (953.4KB, pdf) ).

Fig. (3).

Fig. (3)

Association between fluctuating serum anion gap values and 30-days all-cause mortality risk in patients with AKI. Abbreviations: AKI: acute kidney injury; AG: anion gap; HR: hazard ratio.

4. DISCUSSION

This study aimed to determine whether early variations in the AG could serve as an indicator of AKI outcomes in ICU patients, thereby advancing our understanding of AKI management and decision making in the identification of potential avenues for early intervention in critical care. In this study, we found that AG fluctuations within the first 48 hours of ICU admission are a key predictor of renal recovery and 30-day mortality in AKI patients by collecting data from the MIMIC-IV database. AG fluctuations greater than 5 mmol/L are significantly associated with increased mortality risk by Cox regression and survival analysis. While these findings align with prior studies linking elevated AG to poor outcomes in critically ill populations [36, 37].

AG is a key indicator for evaluating acid-base balance, which maintains its function within the standard range under normal circumstances, providing valuable insights into acid-base status [38, 39]. AG was observed to be elevated in the vast majority of cases in patients with acute kidney injury [40, 41]. In AKI, impaired renal acid excretion and reduced bicarbonate regeneration compromise the body’s capacity to neutralize accumulating anions (e.g., lactate, phosphate) [42, 43]. Elevated ACAG levels (> 20 mmol/L) at ICU admission were an independent risk indicator associated with 30-day and 360-day all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with AKI [41, 44]. Clinical practice research has found that AG level can be used as a valuable predictive indicator for the risk of death during hospitalization in patients with SA-AKI [45, 46]. Static AG values capture a single time point of metabolic status, whereas AG fluctuations reflect the inability of physiological buffering systems to maintain equilibrium under stress. Frequent AG oscillations may signal exhaustion of buffering reserves, as the kidneys and respiratory system struggle to compensate for ongoing metabolic insults [31, 47, 48]. Lactate is a major contributor to AG elevation, and transient AG peaks may represent intermittent tissue hypoxia [49-52]. The transient change of AG value cannot fully represent the severity of the disease or progression of the disease. Studies in septic shock have shown that lactate variability—rather than absolute values—predicts mortality [53, 54]. Although existing studies have reported that the levels of AG or ACAG are associated with the risk of AKI in patients. However, few studies have explored the correlation between the dynamic changes of AG during hospitalization in critically ill patients and the prognosis of AKI. The dynamic changes of AG can serve as markers of insufficient tissue perfusion and metabolic imbalance [48, 55]. AG fluctuations reflect the dynamic process of metabolic disorders and can better reflect the dynamic changes of compensatory capacity than a single measurement value [56, 57]. Renal acid excretion disorders and insufficient respiratory compensation jointly lead to sharp fluctuations in AG. Monitoring the dynamic changes of AG can indicate the changing trend of multiple organ dysfunction [58-60]. Therefore, dynamic AG monitoring has greater prognostic value than static values. Our findings revealed a clear association between higher AG fluctuations and adverse outcomes. Specifically, patients with AG fluctuations greater than 5 mmol/L had a lower likelihood of renal recovery and a significantly higher 30-day mortality rate. The initial univariate analysis indicated that AG fluctuations above this threshold were predictive of both poor renal outcomes and increased mortality risk. Multivariate Cox regression analysis, which adjusted for non-ionic confounders such as age, sex, and comorbidities, maintained the significance of AG fluctuations in relation to both outcomes. However, after further adjusting for serum ionic concentrations, AG fluctuations no longer predicted outcomes. The loss of AG’s predictive value in Model 5 (after adjusting for ions) underscores that its prognostic utility is mediated through these downstream electrolyte disturbances. This discovery reveals that the prognostic value of AG fluctuations does not exist independently but is indirectly mediated through metabolic disorders and the severity of systemic diseases. The observational clinical study indicated that AG fluctuations often parallel shifts in serum electrolytes. Fluctuations in AG may thus represent dynamic shifts in these cryptic anions. Although the direct effect of AG fluctuations in Model 5 disappeared, its dynamic changes still have clinical warning significance. Targeting the specific abnormalities behind AG fluctuations (such as correcting acidosis and managing hyperkalemia) may be more effective than focusing on AG itself [61, 62]. Based on the properties of AG, it also highlights the importance of AG as an indicator of electrolyte disturbances in AKI patients. This discovery calls on clinicians to combine electrolyte profiles and organ function assessment when interpreting AG, rather than relying on AG values in isolation.

The ICU setting presents a complex environment, where patients frequently experience multiple organ dysfunction, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and hemodynamic instability [63]. These factors contribute to inadequate renal perfusion and the use of nephrotoxic drugs, further impairing kidney function and perpetuating a cycle of renal decline [64]. Reduced kidney function not only leads to electrolyte imbalances but also precipitates metabolic acidosis, as the kidneys are unable to efficiently clear toxins and acidic metabolites. This creates a harmful feedback loop, where accumulating toxins further damages the kidneys [48, 65]. Even mild reductions in glomerular filtration rate can result in the retention of non-chloride anions, a phenomenon that contributes to elevated AG values in ICU patients [31, 66]. In AKI patients, the accumulation of anions such as lactate and phosphate, combined with sodium and water retention, significantly alters the AG, reflecting the severity of electrolyte and metabolic disturbances. Moreover, ICU patients frequently experience elevated physiological stress, which triggers sympathetic nervous system activation, accelerating glycolysis and disrupting bioenergetics, leading to elevated lactate levels [67]. Research shows that lactate and ketone bodies contribute to over 60% of AG increases [68], reinforcing the role of AG as a marker of metabolic imbalance. Fluctuations in AG, therefore, offer valuable insights into the metabolic and electrolyte status of critically ill patients, providing clinicians with a practical tool to monitor disease progression and the efficacy of therapeutic interventions.

In recent years, AG has gained recognition as a useful serological marker due to its ease of calculation and its predictive power in assessing mortality risk [69]. Elevated AG levels have been consistently linked with poor outcomes, particularly in AKI patients in the ICU [15, 16]. Previous studies have identified an AG threshold of 14 mmol/L or higher as a significant predictor of 28-day mortality in ICU patients with AKI [45]. Real-world studies have further demonstrated the relationship between elevated AG levels are associated with the 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day mortality rates of AKI patients in the ICU [19]. While much of the existing literature has focused on static AG values, our study highlights the prognostic importance of monitoring AG fluctuations over short periods. Specifically, our results indicate that AG fluctuations greater than 5 mmol/L are associated with significantly increased mortality risk, underscoring the need for clinicians to track not only absolute AG levels but also their dynamic changes in ICU patients. Patients with AKI are at high risk for metabolic acidosis due to impaired acid excretion, increased lactic acid production from infections or hypoxia, and conditions such as diabetic ketoacidosis [70-72]. Metabolic acidosis, particularly the high AG variant, is associated with worse clinical outcomes, including higher mortality rates and longer ICU stays [73]. Not only does AKI contribute to the development of metabolic acidosis, but growing evidence suggests that acidosis itself can further worsen renal function [65, 74]. AG plays a critical role in distinguishing between different types of metabolic acidosis, allowing clinicians to narrow the differential diagnosis and detect concurrent disturbances in acid-base balance [75]. Our study reinforces the importance of AG in this context, emphasizing that fluctuations in AG provide additional prognostic value, guiding more tailored and responsive management strategies in critically ill AKI patients.

This study is strengthened by its large sample size and the use of the MIMIC-IV database, which offers a rich, real-world dataset. However, there are several limitations to consider. First, the retrospective nature of this study provides a lower level of evidence compared to prospective cohort studies or randomized controlled trials. Second, we did not make ACAG as main subject of this study. Serum albumin contributes significantly to the plasma’s buffering capacity by binding to cations. This binding propensity, in turn, impacts the calculated anion gap [36, 38]. However, our research found that whether AG was taken as the main research object or ACAG was taken as the main research object, the conclusions obtained from both were consistent, indicating that our research results were robust. Lastly, the retrospective design of the MIMIC-IV database introduces potential residual confounding, despite rigorous adjustment for demographic, clinical, and biochemical variables. Unmeasured confounders, such as fluid balance, acid-base therapies (e.g., sodium bicarbonate administration), and nutritional status, may influence AG values and their interpretation. For instance, aggressive fluid resuscitation or diuretic use could alter electrolyte concentrations, indirectly affecting AG calculations. Interventions targeting acid-base balance might transiently mask true metabolic disturbances, thereby biasing the observed associations between AG fluctuations and outcomes. Nutritional factors, including hypoalbuminemia or protein intake, could further confound AG measurements. Future prospective studies incorporating detailed data on fluid management, therapeutic interventions, and nutritional parameters are warranted to validate our findings.

CONCLUSION

AG fluctuations during the first 48 hours of ICU admission are closely associated with adverse outcomes in AKI patients, primarily reflecting underlying metabolic disturbances and systemic disease severity. While AG variability ≥5.00 mmol/L predicts short-term mortality in unadjusted analyses, this association is mediated by electrolyte imbalances and multi-organ dysfunction. Monitoring AG dynamics may aid clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and enhancing patient management by allowing for timely interventions that may improve prognosis.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

ACAG

Albumin-corrected Anion Gap

AG

Anion Gap

AKI

Acute Kidney Injury

ICU

Intensive Care Unit

KDIGO

Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes

MIMIC

Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care

RCS

Restricted Cubic Spline

SCr

Serum Creatinine

SD

Standard Deviation

UO

Urine Output

AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS

The authors confirm their contribution to the paper as follows: QL designed the study and experiments. LH collected, analyzed, interpreted the data and charts. LH and SK wrote the manuscript. QL revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

The use of the MIMIC-IV database was approved by the review committee of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. The data is publicly available (in the MIMIC-IV database), therefore, the ethical approval was waived for this study.

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of institutional and/or research committees and with the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki, as revised in 2013.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

The requirement for informed consent was waived for this study.

STANDARDS OF REPORTING

STROBE guidelines were followed.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

The data and supportive information are available within the article.

FUNDING

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge the data provided by patients and researchers participating in the MIMIC-IV database.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary material is available on the publisher’s website along with the published article.

CPD-32-29-2450_SD1.pdf (953.4KB, pdf)

REFERENCES

  • 1.Valdenebro M., Portoles J., Serrano Salazar M.L., et al. Transitions and long-term clinical outcomes in patients admitted in intensive care units receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. J clin Med. 2024;13(17):5085. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schiefer J., Bernardi M.H., Lichtenegger P., et al. Incidence and outcomes of AKI in postoperative patients admitted to ICU using full KDIGO criteria – A cohort study. J Clin Anesth. 2023;89:111156. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hoste E.A.J., Bagshaw S.M., Bellomo R., et al. Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: the multinational AKI-EPI study. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(8):1411–23. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3934-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Srisawat N., Kulvichit W., Mahamitra N., et al. The epidemiology and characteristics of acute kidney injury in the Southeast Asia intensive care unit: A prospective multicentre study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020;35(10):1729–38. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfz087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Deng Y., Chi R., Chen S., et al. Evaluation of clinically available renal biomarkers in critically ill adults: A prospective multicenter observational study. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1626-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shaikhouni S., Yessayan L. Management of acute kidney injury/renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit. Surg Clin North Am. 2022;102(1):181–98. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2021.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Susantitaphong P., Cruz D.N., Cerda J., et al. World Incidence of AKI. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8(9):1482–93. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00710113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Coca S.G., Yusuf B., Shlipak M.G., Garg A.X., Parikh C.R. Long-term risk of mortality and other adverse outcomes after acute kidney injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53(6):961–73. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.11.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Griffin B.R., Liu K.D., Teixeira J.P. Critical care nephrology: Core curriculum 2020. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75(3):435–52. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Singbartl K., Kellum J.A. AKI in the ICU: Definition, epidemiology, risk stratification, and outcomes. Kidney Int. 2012;81(9):819–825. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lisa A., Carbone F., Liberale L., Montecucco F. The need to identify novel markers for early renal injury in cardiorenal syndrome. Cells. 2024;13(15):1283. doi: 10.3390/cells13151283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chávez-Íñiguez J.S., Maggiani-Aguilera P., Aranda-García de Quevedo A., et al. Serum potassium trajectory during acute kidney injury and mortality risk. Nephron J. 2023;147(9):521–30. doi: 10.1159/000529588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Asakage A., Ishihara S., Boutin L., et al. Predictive performance of neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin, liver type fatty acid binding protein, and cystatin C for Acute kidney injury and mortality in severely ill patients. Ann Lab Med. 2024;44(2):144–54. doi: 10.3343/alm.2023.0083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang T., Widdop R.E., Ricardo S.D. Transition from acute kidney injury to chronic kidney disease: Mechanisms, models, and biomarkers. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2024;327(5):F788–805. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00184.2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lu Z., Yao Y., Xu Y., Zhang X., Wang J. Albumin corrected anion gap for predicting in-hospital death among patients with acute myocardial infarction: A retrospective cohort study. Clinics. 2024;79:100455. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Peng S., Chen Q., Ke W., Wu Y. The relationship between serum anion gap levels and short-, medium-, and long-term all-cause mortality in ICU patients with congestive heart failure: A retrospective cohort study. Acta Cardiol. 2024;79(6):705–719. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2024.2371627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lou Z., Zeng F., Huang W., Xiao L., Zou K., Zhou H. Association between the anion-gap and 28-day mortality in critically ill adult patients with sepsis: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine. 2024;103(30):e39029. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yu W., Wen Y., Shao Y., Hu T., Wan X. Relationship between anion gap and in-hospital mortality in intensive care patients with liver failure: A retrospective propensity score matching analysis. Am J Transl Res. 2024;16(1):98–108. doi: 10.62347/UVCX1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cheng B., Li D., Gong Y., Ying B., Wang B. Serum Anion gap predicts all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: Analysis of the MIMIC-III database. Dis Markers. 2020;2020:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2020/6501272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhong L., Xie B., Ji X.W., Yang X.H. The association between albumin corrected anion gap and ICU mortality in acute kidney injury patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy. Intern Emerg Med. 2022;17(8):2315–2322. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03093-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhu J., Zhang Z., Lei Y., et al. The prediction value of serum anion gap for short-term mortality in pulmonary hypertension patients with sepsis: A retrospective cohort study. Front Med. 2025;11:1499677. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1499677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li M., Li C., Wang J., Yuan Q. The association between anion gap and prognosis in patients myocardial infarction with congestive heart failure: A retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database. Int J Emerg Med. 2025;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00828-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang S., Chen N., Huang Z., Yan N., Ma L., Gao X. Geriatric nutritional risk index is associated with the occurrence of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with acute heart failure. Ren Fail. 2024;46(1):2349122. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2349122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhu Q., Zong Q., Guo S., et al. Mean amplitude of glycemic excursion and mortality in critically ill patients: A retrospective analysis using the MIMIC ‐ IV database. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025;dom.16410 doi: 10.1111/dom.16410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chen Y., Zhou B., Peng C., Liu Y., Lai W. Prognostic implications of system inflammation response index in atrial fibrillation patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):1025. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84666-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Peng H., Su Y., Luo J., Ding N. Association between admission hemoglobin level and prognosis in sepsis patients based on a critical care database. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):5212. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55954-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kellum J.A., Lameire N. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: A KDIGO summary (Part 1). Crit Care. 2013;17(1):204. doi: 10.1186/cc11454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Marecek R., Kissling S., Teso A.D., Vuignier Y., Wojtusciszyn A. Chronic metabolic acidosis in a patient with diabetes on maintenance haemodialysis: Mind the anion gap. Lancet. 2024;404(10452):570–571. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01452-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hu T., Zhang Z., Jiang Y. Albumin corrected anion gap for predicting in-hospital mortality among intensive care patients with sepsis: A retrospective propensity score matching analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2021;521:272–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Oh M.S., Carroll H.J. The anion gap. N Engl J Med. 1977;297(15):814–817. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197710132971507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Abramowitz M.K., Hostetter T.H., Melamed M.L. The serum anion gap is altered in early kidney disease and associates with mortality. Kidney Int. 2012;82(6):701–709. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhou P., Liu B., Shen N., et al. Acute kidney injury in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A single-center retrospective study. Ren Fail. 2024;46(1):2326186. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2326186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhao G., Xu C., Ying J., et al. Association between furosemide administration and outcomes in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2798-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lin C.-Y., Su Y.-J., Cheng T.-T., et al. Increased risk of end-stage renal disease in patients with systemic sclerosis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2022;51(2):120–7. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2021.1917143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ruan A., Zheng J., Sun S., Liu X., Chen T. The association of albumin-corrected anion gap and acute kidney injury in heart failure patients: A competing risk model analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025;25(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04723-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yao H., Tian J., Cheng S. Association of anion gap and albumin corrected anion gap with acute kidney injury in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2025;34(3):351–9. doi: 10.17219/acem/186814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang Y., Zhong L., Min J., Lu J., Zhang J., Su J. Albumin corrected anion gap and clinical outcomes in elderly patients with acute kidney injury caused or accompanied by sepsis: A MIMIC-IV retrospective study. Eur J Med Res. 2025;30(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02238-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pratumvinit B., Lam L., Kongruttanachok N., et al. Anion gap reference intervals show instrument dependence and weak correlation with albumin levels. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;500:172–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Acid-Base HK. Acid-Base. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2023;53:191–206. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2022.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Alhamad T., Blandon J., Meza A.T., Bilbao J.E., Hernandez G.T. Acute kidney injury with oxalate deposition in a patient with a high anion gap metabolic acidosis and a normal osmolal gap. J Nephropathol. 2013;2(2):139–43. doi: 10.5812/nephropathol.10657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhao X., Han J., Hu J., et al. Association between albumin-corrected anion gap level and the risk of acute kidney injury in intensive care unit. Int Urol Nephrol. 2023;56(3):1117–27. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03755-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lo K.B., Garvia V., Stempel J.M., Ram P., Rangaswami J. Bicarbonate use and mortality outcome among critically ill patients with metabolic acidosis: A meta analysis. Heart Lung. 2020;49(2):167–74. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nagami G.T., Kraut J.A. The role of the endocrine system in the regulation of acid–base balance by the kidney and the progression of chronic kidney disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(4):2420. doi: 10.3390/ijms25042420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gao P., Min J., Zhong L., Shao M. Association between albumin corrected anion gap and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: A retrospective study based on MIMIC-IV database. Ren Fail. 2023;45(2):2282708. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2282708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jiang L., Wang Z., Wang L., et al. Predictive value of the serum anion gap for 28-day in-hospital all-cause mortality in sepsis patients with acute kidney injury: A retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database. Ann Transl Med. 2022;10(24):1373. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-5916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pan Q., Mu Z., Li Y., et al. The association between serum anion gap and acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndrome. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023;23(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03588-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Adrogué H.J., Madias N.E. Management of life-threatening acid-base disorders. Second of two parts. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(2):107–111. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199801083380207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jaber S., Paugam C., Futier E., et al. Sodium bicarbonate therapy for patients with severe metabolic acidaemia in the intensive care unit (BICAR-ICU): A multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;392(10141):31–40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31080-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dimeski G., Holford A., Isoardi K. Suggested guide to using lactate gap as a surrogate marker in the diagnosis of ethylene glycol overdose. Ann Clin Biochem. 2025;62(2):140–2. doi: 10.1177/00045632241292514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rudkin S.E., Grogan T.R., Treger R.M. Relationship between the anion gap and serum lactate in hypovolemic shock. J Intensive Care Med. 2022;37(12):1563–8. doi: 10.1177/08850666221106413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Burggren W.W., Andrewartha S.J., Mueller C.A., Dubansky B., Tazawa H. Acid-base and hematological regulation in chicken embryos during internal progressive hypercapnic hypoxia. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2023;308:103996. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2022.103996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gough L.A., Brown D., Deb S.K., Sparks S.A., McNaughton L.R. The influence of alkalosis on repeated high-intensity exercise performance and acid–base balance recovery in acute moderate hypoxic conditions. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018;118(12):2489–98. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3975-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kattan E., Hernández G. The role of peripheral perfusion markers and lactate in septic shock resuscitation. J Intensive Med. 2022;2(1):17–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2021.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Vincent J.L., Quintairos e Silva A., Couto L., Taccone F.S. The value of blood lactate kinetics in critically ill patients: A systematic review. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1403-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hernandez G., Bellomo R., Bakker J. The ten pitfalls of lactate clearance in sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(1):82–5. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5213-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Adrogué H.J., Madias N.E. Management of life-threatening acid-base disorders. First of two parts. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(1):26–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199801013380106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Xu C., Sun L., Dong M., et al. Serum anion gap is associated with risk of all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with acute myocardial infarction. Int J Gen Med. 2022;15:223–31. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S336701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kellum J.A., Song M., Li J. Science review: Extracellular acidosis and the immune response: Clinical and physiologic implications. Crit Care. 2004;8(5):331–336. doi: 10.1186/cc2900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Li N., Li J., Wang K. Independent prognostic importance of the albumin-corrected anion gap in critically ill patients with congestive heart failure: A retrospective study from MIMIC-IV database. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024;24(1):735. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04422-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Achanti A., Szerlip H.M. Acid-base disorders in the critically ill patient. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023;18(1):102–112. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04500422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kraut J.A., Madias N.E. Intravenous sodium bicarbonate in treating patients with severe metabolic acidemia. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;73(4):572–575. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Glasmacher S.A., Stones W. Anion gap as a prognostic tool for risk stratification in critically ill patients – A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015;16(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0241-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.de Vries V.A., Müller M.C.A., Arbous M.S., et al. Long-term outcome of patients with a hematologic malignancy and multiple organ failure admitted at the intensive care. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(2):e120–8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zhang C., Ning M., Liang W., et al. The association between acute kidney injury and dysglycaemia in critically ill patients with and without diabetes mellitus: A retrospective single-center study. Ren Fail. 2024;46(2):2397555. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2397555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hu J., Wang Y., Geng X., et al. Metabolic acidosis as a risk factor for the development of acute kidney injury and hospital mortality. Exp Ther Med. 2017;13(5):2362–74. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Mónica Torres A., Mac Laughlin M., Muller A., Brandoni A., Anzai N., Endou H. Altered renal elimination of organic anions in rats with chronic renal failure. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2005;1740(1):29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2005.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Jung B., Rimmele T., Le Goff C., et al. Severe metabolic or mixed acidemia on intensive care unit admission: incidence, prognosis and administration of buffer therapy. A prospective, multiple-center study. Crit Care. 2011;15(5):R238. doi: 10.1186/cc10487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gabow P.A., Kaehny W.D., Fennessey P.V., Goodman S.I., Gross P.A., Schrier R.W. Diagnostic importance of an increased serum anion gap. N Engl J Med. 1980;303(15):854–858. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198010093031505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wang M., Yang S., Deng J., et al. Unveiling the hidden risks: Albumin-corrected anion gap as a superior marker for cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes: Insights from a nationally prospective cohort study. Front Endocrinol. 2024;15:1461047. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1461047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Patel M.L., Sachan R., Kumar R. A comparative study of community-acquired acute kidney injury and hospital-acquired acute kidney injury from a tertiary care hospital in North India. Ann Afr Med. 2024;23(3):420–428. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_110_23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Heyman S.N., Khamaisi M., Zorbavel D., Rosen S., Abassi Z. Role of hypoxia in renal failure caused by nephrotoxins and hypertonic solutions. Semin Nephrol. 2019;39(6):530–42. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2019.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hua Y., Ding N., Jing H., et al. Association between SOFA score and risk of acute kidney injury in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: An analysis of the MIMIC-IV database. Front Endocrinol. 2024;15:1462330. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1462330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Silva Júnior G.B., Daher E.D.F., Mota R.M.S., Menezes F.A. Risk factors for death among critically ill patients with acute renal failure. Sao Paulo Med J. 2006;124(5):257–263. doi: 10.1590/S1516-31802006000500004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Bonner R., Hladik G. Renal tubular acidosis: Core curriculum 2025. Am J Kidney Dis. 2025;85(4):501–12. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Fenves A.Z., Emmett M. Approach to patients with high anion gap metabolic acidosis: Core curriculum 2021. Am J Kidney Dis. 2021;78(4):590–600. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.02.341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material is available on the publisher’s website along with the published article.

CPD-32-29-2450_SD1.pdf (953.4KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data and supportive information are available within the article.


Articles from Current Pharmaceutical Design are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers

RESOURCES