Abstract
We find that the microbiome plays a critical role in the formation of cerebral cavernous malformations in neonatal but not adult life.
Keywords: Neuroscience, Vascular biology
Keywords: Microbiome, Stroke
Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are vascular lesions causing intracerebral hemorrhage, seizures, and progressive neurological deficits (1). Human genetic studies show that CCMs arise following endothelial loss-of-function (LOF) mutations in KRIT1, CCM2, or PDCD10, or an I441M gain-of-function (GOF) mutation in MAP3K3, resulting in augmented MEKK3/KLF2/4 signaling (1). CCMs present as a familial form with germline mutations conferring multiple lifelong lesions, or a sporadic form with single lesions from acquired mutations. Recently, clinically symptomatic CCMs were found to harbor oncogenic PIK3CA GOF mutations (2).
Mouse models demonstrated that neonatally induced endothelial loss of KRIT1, CCM2, or PDCD10 is sufficient to confer widespread CCMs that histologically resemble human lesions. While these models yielded key mechanistic insights, they diverge from human sporadic CCMs because CCM gene loss is induced only during early postnatal life and not in the mature brain. This was later explained by the discovery that more than 70% of surgically resected CCMs harbor PIK3CA mutations and by studies demonstrating that combined CCM LOF and PI3K GOF drive rapid solitary lesion growth in the mature mouse brain (2).
In neonatally induced mouse models, CCM formation unexpectedly requires brain endothelial TLR4 signaling triggered by circulating gut microbiome–derived lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (3). Our group demonstrated that neonatally induced CCM formation depends on both brain endothelial TLR4 and the microbiome, while lesion burden in human familial CCMs correlates with genomic changes enhancing TLR4 signaling (3). These findings were substantiated by the finding that germline mutations in PDCD10 confer more severe disease than KRIT1 or CCM2, as PDCD10 also maintains gut barrier integrity, limiting microbial dissemination and circulating LPS (4). The discovery of a gut-brain signaling axis raised the possibility that CCM risk is determined by — and could be modified by — an individual’s microbiome.
The discovery that many resected human CCMs harbor a second PIK3CA GOF hit, and that lesions form only during neonatal life without such a hit, raised the possibility that microbiome-driven CCM formation is restricted to neonatal life. To test this, we used an inducible adult CCM model in which brain endothelial Krit1 LOF and Pik3caH1047R GOF are induced focally by AAV-Cre injection following craniotomy. To assess microbiome contribution, 8- to 10-week-old Krit1fl/fl; iPik3caH1047R mice received antimicrobial treatment previously shown to deplete Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) and prevent neonatally induced CCM formation (3) (Figure 1A). Following a 3-day pretreatment, CCM formation was induced by craniotomy and AAV-Cre injection. Fecal bacterial load and GNB abundance, measured by qPCR of total bacterial 16S and Bacteroidetes s24-7, respectively, were reduced by more than 99% before lesion induction (Figure 1, B and C). Lesion growth was monitored longitudinally by live imaging and high-frequency transcranioplasty ultrasound (TCUS), and endpoint lesion volumes quantified by blinded microCT on postoperative day (POD) 21 (Supplemental Figure 1 and Figure 1, D and E; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.208733DS1).
Figure 1. Antibiotic treatment does not prevent PIK3CA-driven CCM growth in the adult brain.

(A) Adult Krit1fl/fl; iPik3caH1047R mice received antibiotics (ABX) before craniotomy and focal AAV-Cre injections. (B and C) qPCR quantification of bacterial 16S rRNA (B) and Bacteroidetes s24-7 rRNA (C). n = 5/group. (D) Representative CCM preogression. (E) Representative gross and microCT images. (F) Lesion volumes on POD 21. Control, n = 9; ABX, n = 10. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001. NS, no significant difference (P = 0.6620).
Despite sustained microbiome depletion throughout the 21-day period (Figure 1, B and C), adult iPik3caH1047R-driven CCM lesions formed and progressed at rates indistinguishable from controls (Figure 1, D and E). Live imaging demonstrated variable lesion enlargement over time, with no difference between groups (Supplemental Figure 1 and Figure 1D), and blinded microCT assessment confirmed no significant difference in lesion burden (Figure 1F). The study was powered to detect a large effect on lesion burden, comparable to neonatally induced studies (Cohen’s d ≈ 1.3 at 80% power). These findings suggested that, unlike neonatally induced CCM formation due to CCM LOF alone, microbiome-derived LPS is dispensable for adult CCM formation driven by combined CCM LOF and PI3K GOF.
To further test whether the microbiome-derived LPS contributes to iPik3caH1047R-driven CCM formation in adults, we examined the requirement for TLR4, a receptor required in a dose-dependent manner for neonatally induced CCM formation (3). Littermate mice harboring Krit1fl/fl and Pik3caH1047R alleles on the Tlr4+/+, Tlr4+/–, or Tlr4–/– background were analyzed as described above. Neither partial nor complete TLR4 loss reduced lesion burden or delayed lesion onset (Supplemental Figure 2), supporting the notion that neither the microbiome nor LPS/TLR4 signaling is required for CCM formation in the adult model.
Although these are negative findings, they provide valuable insights into CCM pathogenesis, therapeutic strategies, and the use/limitations of mouse models. The neonatally induced CCM model relies on both active brain angiogenesis that elevates endothelial PI3K signaling and an immature gut that likely elevates circulating LPS to drive endothelial TLR4/MEKK3 signaling (3). Even in familial CCMs, recent human genetic studies suggest that lesions that enlarge and become symptomatic later in life often harbor PIK3CA mutations and may grow independently of the microbiome (1). Therapeutically, targeting the microbiome or TLR4 signaling is unlikely to be effective beyond neonatal life, whereas inhibition of the common PI3K/mTOR pathway remains promising. Finally, these studies emphasize the importance of reevaluating disease models in light of emerging data and approaches.
We acknowledge several limitations. Not all resected CCMs harbor detectable PIK3CA mutations (2), and patients with CCM exhibit distinct gut microbiota compared with controls (5). Thus, our findings may be limited to PIK3CA-driven lesions. Other factors converging on PI3K signaling may promote CCM growth independently of detectable PIK3CA mutations. LPS exposure during infection or chronic intestinal disease could also stimulate growth of otherwise quiescent lesions (6). Analyses of PIK3CA mutation burden in growing versus stable CCMs and multifocal CCM models combining CCM LOF and PIK3CA GOF should clarify these mechanisms.
Conflict of interest
IAA reports consulting for Neurelis and Ovid Therapeutics, and JKB for Recursion, outside the submitted work.
Funding support
This work is the result of NIH funding, in whole or in part, and is subject to the NIH Public Access Policy. Through acceptance of this federal funding, the NIH has been given a right to make the work publicly available in PubMed Central.
NIH grants R01HL094326 and R01NS100949 (to MLK).
NIH grant P01NS092521 (to MLK, IAA, and DAM).
Leducq Foundation (to MLK).
Adelman CCM fund (to JKB).
Supplementary Material
Version 1. 07/16/2026
In-Press Preview
Version 2. 09/08/2026
Electronic publication
Footnotes
Copyright: © 2026, Li et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reference information: JCI Insight. 2026;11(17):e208733. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.208733.
Contributor Information
Lun Li, Email: Lun.Li@Pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Rhonda Lightle, Email: rlightle@surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Bader Ali, Email: Bader.Ali@bsd.uchicago.
Georgeio Sader, Email: georgeio.sader@bsd.uchicago.edu.
Robert Shenkar, Email: rshenkar@uchicago.edu.
Sean P. Polster, Email: Sean.Polster@uchospitals.edu.
Douglas A. Marchuk, Email: douglas.marchuk@duke.edu.
Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Email: jan.burkhardt@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Issam A. Awad, Email: iawad@surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Mark L. Kahn, Email: markkahn@mail.med.upenn.edu.
References
- 1.Snellings DA, et al. Cerebral cavernous malformation: from mechanism to therapy. Circ Res. 2021;129(1):195–215. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ren AA, et al. PIK3CA and CCM mutations fuel cavernomas through a cancer-like mechanism. Nature. 2021;594(7862):271–276. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03562-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tang AT, et al. Endothelial TLR4 and the microbiome drive cerebral cavernous malformations. Nature. 2017;545(7654):305–310. doi: 10.1038/nature22075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tang AT, et al. Distinct cellular roles for PDCD10 define a gut-brain axis in cerebral cavernous malformation. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(520):eaaw3521. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw3521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Polster SP, et al. Permissive microbiome characterizes human subjects with a neurovascular disease cavernous angioma. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):2659. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16436-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Snellings DA, et al. Developmental venous anomalies are a genetic primer for cerebral cavernous malformations. Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2022;1:246–252. doi: 10.1038/s44161-022-00035-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
