Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2026 Oct 19;17:9969. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-77896-0

Controlling the shell growth mechanism and interfacial oxidation of InAs/ZnSe quantum dots for shortwave infrared emission

Taewan Kim 1,#, Manuela De Franco 1,#, Miguel Dosil 1, Jae Taek Oh 1, Rajesh Bera 1, Marta Martos Valverde 1, Gaurav Kumar 1, Gerasimos Konstantatos 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC13680504  PMID: 42897179

Abstract

Short-wave infrared (SWIR) emitters underpin applications in communication, imaging and sensing, yet efficient, scalable devices remain limited. Colloidal InAs quantum dots (InAs CQDs) offer a compelling, cost-effective alternative to conventional epitaxial SWIR light-emitting diodes (LEDs). However, developing heavy-metal-free InAs CQDs for emission beyond 1400 nm is hindered by lattice mismatch during core/shell growth, which degrades photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY). Furthermore, integrating CQDs into LEDs often introduces severe interfacial quenching and intrinsic charge imbalances. Here we report a highly efficient heavy-metal-free SWIR LED operating at 1525 nm, enabled by tailored injection strategies and oxidation-induced interfacial engineering. Optimized high-temperature ZnCl₂ treatment and continuous precursor injection improve shell nucleation and growth, while controlled interfacial oxidation is associated with reduced shell-thickness-dependent strain signatures and improved PLQY retention during shell thickening. Together, these strategies yield measured PLQYs exceeding 55% for emission beyond 1400 nm. Moreover, we demonstrate that incorporating a semiconducting InAs CQD interlayer effectively suppresses interfacial quenching and regulates electron over-injection. Combined with a doped hole-transport layer to reduce series resistance, our optimized devices achieve a maximum external quantum efficiency of 3.5% and a record radiance of ~17 W sr−1 m−2, alongside a T50 operational lifetime of 16 h. Our findings suggest that integrating mechanism-driven shell growth with rational device engineering offers a strategy to overcome current bottlenecks in colloidal emitters, facilitating the transition toward short-wave infrared applications.

Subject terms: Quantum dots; Materials for devices; Lasers, LEDs and light sources


Short-wave infrared emitters could support communication, imaging and sensing, but efficient, scalable devices remain elusive. Kim, De Franco et al. engineered indium arsenide quantum dots and device interfaces, achieving efficient emission, high radiance and improved stability.

Introduction

Short-wave infrared (SWIR) light sources are essential for emerging technologies, including advanced optical communication1, deep-tissue bio-imaging2, and machine vision3. However, conventional epitaxial SWIR light-emitting diodes (LEDs) face critical bottlenecks, including strict lattice-matching requirements and high-cost manufacturing processes, hindering integration with silicon. Colloidal quantum dots (CQDs) present a compelling solution to these challenges. With their size-tunable bandgap, direct band transitions, and narrow emission linewidths, CQDs not only offer superior optical properties but also enable cost-effective solution processing and substrate-independent integration. Despite this potential, SWIR CQD LEDs remain in their early stages. Previous studies on SWIR CQD LEDs have relied on toxic heavy metal-based semiconductors4–6, with the exploration of heavy-metal-free SWIR candidates being largely uncharted.

InAs CQDs are emerging as promising lead-free semiconductor nanocrystals for applications in the NIR and SWIR regions, owing to their excellent electrical conductivity, high thermal stability, and broad optical wavelength tunability7,8. Early demonstrations of InAs CQD electroluminescence were achieved at around 1200 nm, but reported external quantum efficiency (EQE) was below 0.5%9. Since the demonstration of InAs CQDs with absorption beyond 1600 nm in 202110, substantial progress has been made in developing more scalable and accessible synthetic routes. In particular, conventional syntheses rely on highly reactive tris(trimethylsilyl)arsine (TMS-As)11 precursors, which are hazardous and subject to strict handling and regulatory limitations, motivating the development of safer alternatives such as tris(dimethylamino)arsine (amino-As)12–14. Despite these advances, achieving high photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) in SWIR-emitting InAs CQDs remains challenging due to non-radiative recombination from surface defects, interfacial strain, and incomplete passivation, reflecting a limited mechanistic understanding of interface formation and surface passivation. To date, relatively high PLQY has been demonstrated primarily for core/shell InAs CQDs emitting in the 950-1100 nm range15, while emission beyond 1400 nm typically yields PLQY below 20%16.

Recent progress in amino-As-derived InAs/ZnSe core/shell CQDs has enabled RoHS-compliant CQD LEDs with steadily improving performance. EQEs have increased from 5.5% at 947 nm to 13.3% at 896 nm through shell optimization17,18. However, these advances rely on relatively small CQDs, limiting emission to wavelengths below 1100 nm. Extending emission into the SWIR regime, LEDs based on larger InAs/ZnSe CQDs achieve EQE of 1.1% at 1410 nm, representing the state of the art for InAs-based CQD LEDs beyond 1.4 μm to the best of our knowledge19. Nevertheless, both PLQY and device efficiency remain limited at longer wavelengths.

One widely used approach to improve the PLQY of core-shell structures is growing multiple or graded shell to mitigate lattice mismatch20,21. However, these methods increase the total particle size, hindering charge injection in light-emitting diodes, and require complex multi-step synthetic processes22. Another intriguing yet contentious approach to increasing the PLQY of III-V InP core/shell CQDs is the oxidation of the core. While oxidation of the CQD surface is generally known to increase the full width at half maximum (FWHM) and create traps that decrease the PL and device performance23, it has also been shown to increase the PLQY of InP cores by reducing lattice mismatch with ZnS shell24 or passivating surface defects25. Nevertheless, the precise structural role of the oxide layer, particularly whether it functions merely as a surface passivator or as a structural buffer to facilitate epitaxial growth, has not been fully elucidated23–25.

In this study, we report an InAs/ZnSe core/shell CQD synthesis strategy achieving a PLQY over 40% at wavelengths beyond 1400 nm, avoiding highly reactive reducing agents or toxic precursors. This performance is enabled by an optimized shell growth method and an oxide layer. Specifically, high-temperature ZnCl2 treatment and continuous precursor injection improve shell growth, while controlled interfacial oxidation is associated with reduced shell-thickness-dependent strain evolution and improved PLQY retention. Together, these strategies yield measured PLQYs exceeding 55% at emission wavelengths beyond 1400 nm. To demonstrate the full potential of our highly emissive CQDs, we fabricated SWIR LEDs targeting 1550 nm emission. To maximize device efficiency and radiance, we engineered the charge-transport interfaces by introducing a small-sized InAs CQD layer as an electron-transport interlayer, together with a doped hole-transport layer. The InAs CQD interlayer effectively suppresses non-radiative recombination at the interface, thereby prolonging the radiative recombination lifetime and reducing trap-mediated losses. Concurrently, the use of p-doped poly-[bis(4-phenyl)(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)]amine (PTAA) enhances hole transport, ensuring higher radiance. These synergistic interfacial improvements yielded a record-setting EQE of 3.5% and a radiance of 17 W sr−1 m−2, representing the highest performance reported to date for SWIR InAs CQD LEDs.

Results and discussion

Growth mechanism elucidation and optimization for InAs/ZnSe Core/shells

In general, InAs CQDs synthesized using amino-As precursors form tetrahedral shapes composed of In-rich (111) facets. The In-rich (111) facets can alloy with shell precursors such as Zn, effectively mitigating lattice mismatch and enabling uniform shell growth and surface passivation in small-sized CQDs26. However, the enlarged flat facets in larger CQDs frequently experience increased lattice mismatch at the core-shell interface27–29. As a result, shell growth on these surfaces becomes less uniform and more prone to the formation of interfacial defects, severely degrading the PLQY. To investigate this structural degradation at the interface, we first analyzed the InAs/ZnSe core/shell structures grown via conventional heating-up methods. InAs CQDs were synthesized using In(I)Cl and amino-As precursors, following a modified protocol from a reported method12. Although the use of In(I)Cl provides a scalable synthesis route for large-sized SWIR InAs CQDs, the previously reported one-pot InAs/ZnSe synthesis resulted in aggregation. Therefore, a 20-fold molar ratio of ZnCl2 relative to In was degassed with the cores at 90 °C, followed by the injection of an equivalent molar amount of TOP-Se relative to ZnCl2 prior to the heating-up process. Figure 1a shows the electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) elemental mapping of In and Zn for these baseline samples. As observed in the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images, the synthesized core/shells exhibited significant aggregation.

Fig. 1. Elucidation of the InAs/ZnSe core/shell growth mechanism.

Fig. 1

a HAADF-STEM image and corresponding EELS elemental map (In, yellow; Zn, blue) of InAs/ZnSe core/shell CQDs synthesized via a conventional heating-up method with ZnCl₂ degassed at 90 °C, showing severe aggregation. b HAADF-STEM image and EELS elemental map of core/shell CQDs synthesized under identical ZnCl₂ degassing conditions but with a continuous precursor injection protocol, revealing a pinwheel-like shell morphology with non-conformal ZnSe growth. c HAADF-STEM image and EELS elemental map of core/shell CQDs synthesized with ZnCl₂ degassed at 110 °C followed by continuous injection, yielding uniform tetrahedral or near-spherical morphologies. The white scale bars in Fig. 1a–c correspond to 10 nm. d EELS elemental maps of a representative CQD from the optimized synthesis (c), showing the spatial distribution of indium, zinc, arsenic, and selenium, with trace co-distribution of In and As in the shell region indicative of interfacial alloy formation. The white scale bars in Fig. 1d correspond to 5 nm. e PL spectra of InAs/ZnSe core/shell CQDs synthesized under the three conditions, with PLQY values of 7%, 26%, and 42% for heating-up, continuous injection, and 110 °C degassing with continuous injection, respectively.

Hypothesizing that this aggregation was caused by an excessive amount of shell precursors, we conducted the heating-up process with only half the initial amount of TOP-Se, followed by the continuous injection of the remaining half. Figure 1b presents the TEM images and EELS mapping of In and Zn for the core/shells synthesized using this approach. While the aggregation of the CQDs was significantly reduced, we observed that the shell did not coat the core uniformly, but rather grew into a pinwheel-like morphology. To understand the origin of this phenomenon, we performed TEM with EELS measurements on the core/shells at the initial stage of the reaction (Supplementary Fig. 1). Zn-rich domains were preferentially localized near the vertices of the InAs cores. In the corresponding high-resolution images, the lattice fringes within these Zn-rich regions were non-collinear with those of the adjacent InAs core, demonstrating that the initial domains were crystallographically misoriented rather than conformally extending the core lattice. These observations support a vertex-initiated island-nucleation pathway. The occurrence of approximately four to five wing-like domains in the fully grown particles is also consistent with the growth of multiple independently nucleated domains.

The degassing of ZnCl2 was initially performed at 90 °C because ZnCl2 can etch the surface of InAs CQDs. However, we found that deliberately inducing this etching process results in structural modifications. Figure 1c displays the TEM and EELS mapping of In and Zn for InAs/ZnSe core/shells synthesized from InAs cores treated under vacuum at 110 °C for 2 h with continuous injection process. Unlike the previous cases, these core/shells predominantly exhibited a tetrahedral or sphere-like morphology. To understand the mechanism behind this structural evolution, EELS mapping including In, As, Zn, and Se elements was examined. In contrast to the 90 °C case, which provided separated InAs and ZnSe as shown in Supplementary Fig. 2, trace amounts of In and As were found to co-distribute with Zn and Se in the shell region in Fig. 1d. This observation suggests that the InAs etched by ZnCl2 re-participates in the reaction during shell growth, leading to the formation of an alloy structure. As shown in Fig. 1e, while the initially aggregated core/shells and the pinwheel-shaped shells exhibited PLQYs of only 7% and 26%, respectively, the core/shells synthesized under the optimum conditions achieved an efficiency of approximately 42%.

One notable observation, consistent with previous studies on similar architectures26 and our TEM data (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 3), is that the ZnSe shell does not conformally coat the InAs core. Instead, it often grows as an inverted tetrahedron relative to the core, with the core vertices facing the shell’s facet centers rather than its vertices. In addition, although the ZnSe-rich domains initially nucleate without lattice matching at the core vertices, the fully grown core/shell particles exhibit epitaxial registry across the InAs/ZnSe interface. We speculate that this behavior arises from strain-driven island nucleation of ZnSe on specific InAs (111) facets, followed by the subsequent growth of new tetrahedral structures to minimize the overall interfacial energy and lattice mismatch, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 3. This non-uniform growth mode introduces two significant structural challenges. First, forming a direct epitaxial bond between these zinc-blende facets induces a severe charge imbalance. Unlike uniform growth, where the charge mismatch between In (+¾) and Se (- ½) generates a minor imbalance of only ¼, interfacing the In (111) and Se (111) facets creates a charge disparity (+3/4 vs. −3/2) as shown in Supplementary Fig. 3. This charge mismatch is expected to lead to the formation of dangling bonds or a highly defective amorphous interface to bridge the gap. Second, as these isolated ZnSe tetrahedra grow on different facets and eventually coalesce, the accumulated lattice distortion and strain at their merging boundaries likely hinder the formation of a continuous, defect-free crystal shell. Although our modified shell growth process partially mitigates these growth non-uniformities, the fundamental challenges of lattice mismatch and interfacial strain remain.

Role of the interfacial oxidation in InAs/ZnSe core-shell structures

To address the challenge of shell growth on these enlarged facets, we explored a surface-engineering strategy involving controlled air exposure. To evaluate the effect of core oxidation on subsequent shell growth, 1400 nm InAs cores were exposed to ambient air at room temperature for 0–144 h after purification. As 3 d XPS analysis showed a progressive increase in the relative contribution of oxidized arsenic species with increasing exposure time (Supplementary Fig. 4). The resulting InAs/ZnSe core/shell CQDs exhibited their highest PLQYs of approximately 40–45% when the oxidized arsenic contribution was in the range of approximately 17–26%. Based on these results, an oxidation time of 12 h was selected as the standard condition. Detailed experimental conditions are provided in the Methods section.

Figure 2a displays absorption and photoluminescence spectra of the resulting InAs/ZnSe core/shell CQDs synthesized from cores with varying bandgaps. The pristine samples, which were synthesized under the optimized condition of 110 °C ZnCl2 treatment and continuous precursor injection, exhibited PLQYs of 44%, 42%, and 35% across the 1300 to 1500 nm range, which outperform previously reported values for InAs-based core/shell CQDs in this wavelength range. Furthermore, the oxidized counterparts demonstrated further enhanced PLQYs of 57%, 56% and 42% in the 1200 to 1500 nm window in Fig. 2b, respectively. The batch-to-batch reproducibility of the optimized synthesis was evaluated using six independently synthesized core/shell CQD batches, yielding a mean PLQY of approximately 39%. The optical properties of the pristine and oxidized InAs/ZnSe core/shell CQDs are summarized in Table 1.

Fig. 2. Optical characterization and structural analysis for oxidation-associated strain evolution in InAs/ZnSe core/shell CQDs.

Fig. 2

a, b Absorbance and PL spectra of pristine (a) and oxidized (b) InAs/ZnSe core/shell CQDs synthesized from cores with varying bandgaps. Dashed lines indicate fitted PL spectra. The corresponding PLQY values are indicated for each sample. c, d EELS elemental maps of indium (In, yellow) and oxygen (O, green) for pristine (c) and oxidized (d) InAs/ZnSe core/shell CQDs. The oxygen background present in both samples arises from methanol used during TEM sample preparation. The white scale bars in Fig. 2c and d correspond to 10 nm. e XRD patterns of thin- and thick-shell InAs/ZnSe CQDs synthesized from pristine and oxidized cores. Reference peak positions for bulk ZnSe (blue) and InAs (red) are indicated. f Raman spectra of pristine (top) and oxidized (bottom) core/shell CQDs with varying ZnSe shell thicknesses (1–2, 4, and 7 monolayers).

Table 1.

Optical properties of pristine and oxidized InAs/ZnSe CQDs

InAs/ZnSe 1st peak of core (nm) Emission peak (nm) PLQY (%) FWHM (meV)
Pristine 1254 1380 44 ± 3 165
1294 1559 42 ± 3 137
1392 1591 35 ± 2 180
Oxidized 1220 1363 57 ± 4 151
1238 1416 56 ± 4 149
1367 1560 42 ± 3 161

To investigate the role of interfacial oxidation, we synthesized core/shell CQDs with a thin shell layer and conducted EELS compositional analysis. Both the pristine and oxidized-core samples exhibited high initial PLQYs of 44% and 42%, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 5a and b). As shown in Fig. 2c, the EELS mapping of the pristine InAs/ZnSe CQDs reveals a distinct indium signal but lacks any localized oxygen signal in the CQDs, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 6. In contrast, the EELS mapping of indium and oxygen for the oxidized-core/shell CQDs in Fig. 2d reveals a localized enhancement of the oxygen signal at positions coinciding with the In-rich region, which is absent in the pristine sample (Supplementary Fig. 7). Although a high oxygen background signal is present in both samples due to the methanol treatment during TEM sample preparation as shown in Supplementary Figs. 6 and 7, the compositional profile clearly distinguishes this localized interfacial oxide layer, which is absent in the pristine sample.

To closely investigate the role of the interfacial oxide layer in the growth of core/shell CQDs, we analyzed samples with varying shell thicknesses. While the oxidized core/shell structures maintained a PLQY of approximately 40% even with increased shell thickness, the PLQY of the thick pristine core/shell structures decreased to 23% as shown in Supplementary Fig 8. To analyze this, X-ray diffraction measurements (XRD) revealed that for thin shells, the oxidized sample exhibited peaks closer to zinc selenide, whereas thick shells showed no significant difference between the two samples (Fig. 2e). To verify whether these effects originated from variations in the shell thickness, TEM images and absorption spectra were compared. Given the absence of significant size differences in the TEM images and the identical intensity ratios between the core-originating peaks (above 800 nm) and both core- and shell- originated peaks (below 600 nm), the core and shell thicknesses are considered to be comparable between the samples in Supplementary Figs. 5 and 8. To further investigate these chemical species, XPS analysis was conducted on samples with different shell thicknesses and on the pinwheel-shaped sample shown in Fig. 1b (Supplementary Fig. 9). In both the thick-shell and pinwheel-shaped samples, the In 3 d signal was largely attenuated, whereas the Zn 2p spectra were dominated by a ZnSe-like doublet, with the Zn 2p₃/₂ component near 1021 eV. Under thin shell conditions, however, both the In 3 d and Zn 2p spectra exhibited similar trends. First, tracking the interfacial alloy formation was challenging because the reported binding energies of potential alloy species (such as In2Se3 and Zn3As2) overlap closely with the conventional InAs and ZnSe peaks30,31. Instead, the distinct changes emerged in the higher binding energy regions, suggesting the presence of different chemical species. Specifically, in the pristine sample, additional peaks became apparent near 445.6 and 453.2 eV for In, and 1023.26 and 1046.5 eV for Zn, which are presumed to originate from metal chlorides such as InCl3 and ZnCl232,33. In contrast, for the oxidized sample, these secondary peaks appeared with increased relative intensity at slightly lower binding energies (near 445.2 and 452.9 eV for In 3 d and 1022.9 and 1045.9 eV for Zn 2p), which suggests the additional presence of metal oxides such as InxOy and ZnxOy. The prominent spectral contributions from surface ligands and oxidized chemical species in the thin shell samples can be attributed to the increased surface-to-volume ratio, different synthetic conditions, and the limited probing depth of XPS (see Methods and Supplementary Fig. 9 for details). By contrast, the pinwheel-shaped particles consisted of spatially separated InAs cores and ZnSe wing domains, with no clear evidence of additional Zn-related chemical species.

These XPS results establish a difference in the interfacial chemical environments of the pristine and oxidized samples. The early shift of the XRD peaks toward bulk ZnSe in the oxidized thin shells suggests that the oxide layer accommodates the residual lattice mismatch and suppresses strain accumulation as the shell thickens, allowing the ZnSe shell to crystallize closer to its bulk composition from the early stages of growth. Meanwhile, in the pristine core/shell, as the shell thickens and its outer region approaches a pure ZnSe composition, the structural mismatch between the constrained inner interface and the unconstrained outer shell accumulates internal stress. This stress could induce lattice strain that ultimately degrades the optical properties. To investigate the mechanical strain exerted on the InAs core, Raman spectroscopy was performed on pristine and oxidized core/shell CQDs with varying shell thicknesses as shown in Fig. 2f. In the pristine CQDs, the InAs LO phonon band progressively shifts toward higher wavenumbers and broadens as the shell thickness increases from 1–2 to 7 monolayers (Supplementary Fig. 10), consistent with the accumulation of compressive strain in the core34. In contrast, the oxidized core/shell CQDs exhibit a LO phonon band that remains largely unchanged in both position and lineshape across all shell thicknesses examined, suggesting that the interfacial oxide region limits the additional accumulation of compressive strain in the core as the ZnSe shell thickens. This thickness-independent behavior in the oxidized samples, contrasting with the pronounced spectral evolution in pristine CQDs, is consistent with the divergence in PLQY observed between the two systems upon thick-shell growth (40% vs. 23%) and with a strain-buffering role of the interfacial oxide during shell thickening.

Furthermore, to observe the initial surface states prior to shell growth, XPS analysis was performed on the pristine and oxidized cores following ZnCl2 treatment. For the Zn-treated cores, the Zn 2p spectra exhibited a peak at 1023.1 eV for the pristine sample, consistent with Zn remaining largely as residual ZnCl2 on the surface (Supplementary Fig. 11). In contrast, the oxidized core exhibited a Zn 2p peak at a lower binding energy of 1022.3 eV, consistent with a change from a predominantly ZnCl2-like environment toward Zn coordination involving oxygen-containing surface species. A similar shift was observed in the thin-shell samples (1023.3 eV and 1022.9 eV for pristine and oxidized, respectively), indicating that the altered Zn chemical environment detected after ZnCl2 treatment is also present during the early stages of shell growth. Nevertheless, both Zn-treated pristine and oxidized cores exhibited a negligible PLQY of less than 1%. To further evaluate the passivation effect after shell growth, time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) measurements were performed. Supplementary Fig. 12 shows comparable decay lifetimes between pristine and oxidized CQDs for both thin and thick shells (Supplementary Fig. 12 and Supplementary Table 2). These results suggest that the primary role of the interfacial oxide is to serve as a structural buffer rather than a direct surface passivator. Since interfacial stress and accumulated lattice strain become increasingly severe in larger core/shell systems27,33,35, utilizing such an intermediate buffer layer represents a crucial strategy for employing short-wave infrared InAs CQDs in future electroluminescent applications.

Regulating electron injection in InAs/ZnSe CQD light emitting diodes

Leveraging the tunable properties of our InAs/ZnSe CQDs, we successfully demonstrated LEDs across a broad spectral range between 1300 and 1550 nm (Fig. 3a). Device optimization was performed using the largest-core InAs/ZnSe CQDs, which exhibit a first excitonic absorption peak at 1400 nm and a film PL emission centered at 1500 nm, resulting in electroluminescence centered at 1525 nm (Supplementary Fig. 13). These devices employ CQDs coated with a 3-4 ML ZnSe shell (lateral size of ~11 nm) and subjected to controlled surface oxidation for 12 h, yielding a relatively high PLQY of ~40%. Further shell thickening does not appreciably improve PLQY but introduces electron injection barriers that hinder carrier injection. The LEDs adopt an inverted configuration, in which the CQD emissive layer is sandwiched between a transparent indium tin oxide (ITO) cathode serving as the electron-injecting contact and a MoOx/Au anode that facilitates efficient hole injection (Fig. 3b). A ZnO-based electron transport layer (ETL) provides efficient electron transport and facilitates hole-blocking36. The InAs/ZnSe colloidal CQDs emissive layer is deposited next, followed by a PTAA hole transport layer (HTL). The lower hole mobility of PTAA (~10−4−10−3 cm2 V−1 s−1)37, compared to the electron mobility of ZnO ( ~ 10−3−10−2 cm2 V−1 s−1)36, leads to electron-dominated transport, causing carrier imbalance. In addition to this injection asymmetry, ZnO-based ETL introduces interfacial non-radiative recombination likely due to surface defects such as oxygen vacancies and hydroxyl groups, which act as trap states and promote exciton quenching at the ZnO/emissive layer interface38. Previous strategies employing ultrathin insulating interlayers (e.g., PMMA) have been shown to mitigate quenching and reduce electron injection, but at the cost of hindered charge transport and increased series resistance19. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a semiconducting interlayer of wider band-gap InAs CQDs (Eg ~ 1.46 eV), between ZnO and the emissive layer (Fig. 3b, c). The InAs CQDs exhibit a first excitonic absorption peak at ~850 nm, consistent with their small size (~3 nm diameter), and are synthesized via a modified oleic acid (OA)-mediated route (Supplementary Fig. 14)13. To enable their dual function, as a charge-regulating interlayer and surface-passivating interface, the OA-capped InAs CQDs undergo solid-state ligand exchange (SSLE) with indium (III) iodide (InI3) (Supplementary Fig. 14). This process replaces long OA ligands with shorter inorganic ones, improving charge transport and passivating surface trap states39. To directly probe interfacial recombination dynamics, TRPL measurements were performed on InAs/ZnSe CQDs deposited on alumina substrates (Al2O3, used as reference), and on either ZnO or an InAs CQD layer (Fig. 3d). On an inert Al2O3 substrate, the CQDs exhibit an average decay lifetime of 32.50 ns, which serves as a reference sample. When deposited on ZnO, the lifetime decreases to 18.69 ns, indicating strong non-radiative recombination induced by ZnO surface defects. In contrast, CQDs deposited on an InAs-InI3 layer retain a similar lifetime (30.73 ns; Fig. 3d and Supplementary Table 3), demonstrating that the InAs interlayer effectively suppresses interfacial recombination. This, in turn, is expected to translate into improved radiative efficiency in operating devices40. Space-charge-limited current (SCLC) measurements further support improved charge transport in devices incorporating the InAs ETL compared to ZnO-only devices (Supplementary Fig. 15).

Fig. 3. Light-emitting Diodes based on InAs/ZnSe CQDs and ETL optimization.

Fig. 3

a Size-dependent electroluminescence (EL) of InAs/ZnSe quantum dots (QDs), with emission peaks at 1300, 1380, 1450, 1525, and 1550 nm. b Device architecture: ITO//ZnO//InAs-ETL//InAs/ZnSe CQDs//PTAA//MoOₓ//Au. c Cross-sectional SEM of the device. The white scale bars in Fig. 3c correspond to 100 nm. d TRPL of InAs/ZnSe CQDs deposited on Al2O3 (black), ZnO (blue), and InAs ETL (red). Inset: early-time decay dynamics. e Schematic of the energy level alignment and CBM offsets of ZnO, InAs ETL, and InAs/ZnSe. f Flat-band energy level alignment of the device structure. g External quantum efficiency (EQE) of devices employing ZnO as the sole electron transport layer (blue) and ZnO/InAs ETL (red). h Current density-voltage-radiance (J-V-R) characteristics of ZnO-based (blue, black) and ZnO/InAs ETL-based (red, gray) LEDs, showing enhanced radiance at comparable current densities for devices incorporating the InAs ETL.

Building upon these results, the final device architecture was optimized by incorporating the InAs CQD interlayer as a functional ETL and tuning its thickness relative to ZnO. The optimized structure consists of ITO (100 nm) // ZnO (140 nm) // InAs ETL (40 nm) // InAs/ZnSe (25 nm) // PTAA (120 nm) // MoOx (10 nm) // Au (100 nm) (Fig. 3b), with uniform layer stacking confirmed by cross-sectional SEM (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 16). The energy level alignment for this architecture is summarized in Fig. 3e. On the hole side, the valence band maximum (VBM) of the InAs emitting core (VBM = −4.7 eV) aligns with PTAA highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMO = −5.1 eV) and remains close to the UPS-measured value for the InAs/ZnSe system with intermediate shell thickness (VBM = −5.4 eV) (Supplementary Fig. 17). On the electron side, SSLE using halide- based (InI3) inorganic ligands (Supplementary Fig. 18) tunes the energetics of the InAs ETL modifying the energy landscape at both the ZnO/InAs ETL and ETL/emissive layer interfaces41. The conduction band minimum (CBM) of ZnO, at −3.9 eV to the vacuum level, forms a ~ 0.6 eV barrier with the InAs-InI3 ETL (CBM = −3.3 eV), thereby regulating electron injection (Fig. 3f). The InAs ETL is energetically positioned between ZnO and the InAs core of the emitter (CBM = −3.8 eV), while the ZnSe shell (CBM = −2.2 eV) defines the highest-energy barrier. This stepwise alignment lowers the effective injection barrier.

Consistent with the spectroscopic and optoelectronic observations, the incorporation of the ETL InAs-InI3 interlayer leads to a clear improvement in device performance. ZnO-only control devices exhibit a peak EQE of 1.6% (EQEmean = 1.1% ± 0.2%, Fig. 3g), a peak radiance of 0.3 W sr−1 m−2, and a current density of 9 mA cm−2 at 6 V (Fig. 3h). In contrast, devices incorporating the InAs-InI3 ETL show a threefold increase in EQE, reaching a maximum of 4.2% (EQEmean = 3.8% ± 0.2%, Fig. 3g), together with a reduced turn-on voltage (1.1 V compared to 1.3 V for ZnO-only at R = 2 · 10−4 W sr−1 m−2). At a fixed bias of 6 V and current density of ~17 mA cm−2, the radiance increases to 1.1 W sr−1 m−2, approximately three times higher than the control devices (Fig. 3h). The enhancement arises from reduced trap density and more efficient charge balance provided by the InAs ETL, consistent with the lower turn-on voltage and higher radiance at the same current density.

Optimized hole-transport layer for higher radiance

We showed that both ZnO-only and InAs-modified devices operate in a hole-induced resistive regime due to ~100 nm thick PTAA, where the device resistance is dominated by limited hole injection and transport through HTL, making hole transport the main bottleneck (Supplementary Fig. 19). As seen in the previous J-V characteristics (Fig. 3h), the current density is limited to ~10-20 mA cm−2 at 6 V (Fig. 4a). While this configuration yields EQEmax of 4.2%, it also limits radiative output due to reduced current.

Fig. 4. Device characterization upon BCF-doping of PTAA.

Fig. 4

a Current density-voltage-radiance (J-V-R) characteristics of devices with different doping levels. b EQE for devices with a general architecture ITO//ZnO//InAs-InI3//InAs/ZnSe// HTL //MoOx//Au. EQE of devices employing different concentrations of BCF, 0% (Orange- PTAA), 2.5% (red), and 5% (dark red). c Schematic of charge transport. Thick PTAA induces a resistive hole‑transport regime, where low intrinsic conductivity increases the device series resistance and limits hole injection. BCF doping enhances PTAA conductivity, reducing series resistance and boosting hole injection, but leads to hole‑over‑injection due to the limited hole‑blocking ability of the InAs layer, as evidenced by the stronger EQE roll‑off in doped PTAA devices compared to undoped ones. d Stability test on ITO//ZnO//InAs ETL//InAs/ZnSe//PTAA-BCF 5% //MoOx//Au at a constant current density of 100 mA cm−2, under low (blue curve, 22 °C, 30% RH) and high humidity environments (red curve, 24 °C, 60% RH).

To address the charge-limited transport caused by the resistive PTAA layer while maintaining charge balance, molecular doping with tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane (BCF) is employed (Supplementary Fig. 20). As a strong Lewis acid, BCF enhances PTAA conductivity and improves hole mobility42,43. An optimal doping level of ~5 wt% ensures efficient charge transport without loss in device performance. This improvement is directly reflected in device performance: upon BCF doping, the maximum current density increases from ~17 mA cm−2 to ~3500 mA cm−2, while the turn-on voltage decreases from 1.1 V to 0.7 V (Fig. 4a). The maximum radiance correspondingly increases from ~1 W sr−1 m−2 to ~17 W sr−1 m−2, while EQE decreases slightly from 4.2% to 3.5% (Fig. 4b). These results are consistent with enhanced hole transport and reduced series resistance, enabling significantly higher radiative output at the expense of a modest reduction in recombination efficiency. Similar behavior is observed for both ZnO and InAs-based devices (Supplementary Fig. 21), although InAs-based devices consistently exhibit higher overall performance.

Finally, the operational stability of the optimized devices was evaluated under constant-current driving in air, without encapsulation. Measurements were performed under a constant current density of 100 mA cm−2 (initial bias ~3 V and radiance ~4.4 W sr−1 m−2) under two ambient conditions (22 °C/30% RH and 24 °C/60% RH). Under low humidity (30% RH), the device reached 80% of its initial radiance (T80) after 18 h and remained above ~60% of its initial radiance after 40 h. In contrast, at elevated humidity (60% RH), degradation accelerated markedly: the device reached T80 in only 3 h and half of the starting radiance (T50) in 16 h, with the radiance decreasing to ~40% of its initial value within the first ~15-20 h before stabilizing. The strong dependence of the operational lifetime on ambient humidity identifies moisture as a key factor governing device degradation. Although BCF doping improves the moisture resistance of the PTAA HTL through stable Lewis acid-polymer interactions43,44, the InAs/ZnSe CQD film also exhibits a significant decrease in PL intensity under humid conditions (Supplementary Fig. 22), indicating that multiple layers contribute to degradation. The dominant moisture-sensitive pathway within the complete device stack, however, remains unclear. Under both humidity conditions, the devices exhibit a characteristic transient increase in radiance during the initial stage of operation, followed by gradual degradation. While similar positive-aging behavior has been reported for oxide-based ETLs45–48, the additional interfaces introduced by the InAs interlayer make the microscopic origin in the present architecture difficult to identify. Notably, even under the more demanding high-humidity condition, the devices substantially outperform previously reported SWIR InAs CQD LEDs, for which a T50 of only 19 min was achieved at a much lower current density (0.2 mA cm−2) and initial radiance (~0.3 W sr−1 m−2), and only with encapsulation19. The improved operational stability is attributed to two complementary interfacial strategies: an InAs interlayer that mitigates instability at the ETL/emissive-layer junction, as supported by the TRPL results discussed above, and BCF doping of PTAA, which improves the moisture robustness of the HTL. These results demonstrate that the stability improvements reported here are maintained across a range of ambient conditions rather than representing a best-case scenario, while also highlighting the importance of continued interfacial engineering to further enhance environmental stability.

In summary, high-temperature ZnCl2 treatment combined with continuous precursor injection improves the shell nucleation and growth pathway, enabling pristine InAs/ZnSe core/shell CQDs to achieve PLQYs exceeding 40% beyond 1400 nm. Comparative structural and spectroscopic analyses further indicate that controlled interfacial oxidation modifies the core/shell interface and is associated with reduced shell-thickness-dependent strain evolution. Combining optimized shell growth with controlled interfacial oxidation yields measured PLQYs exceeding 55% in the >1400 nm range without relying on toxic or highly reactive precursors. These results identify control of the shell nucleation and growth pathway as the primary determinant of high-efficiency long-wavelength InAs CQD emitters, with interfacial oxidation providing a complementary strategy for limiting additional strain accumulation in thicker-shell structures. Building upon these highly efficient emitters, rational interfacial and transport-layer engineering enables a step-change in SWIR CQD-LED performance. The introduction of the InAs-InI3 CQD interlayer effectively suppresses interfacial quenching and improves charge balance, yielding a maximum EQE of 4.2% (3.8 ± 0.2% average) and a threefold radiance enhancement to 1.1 W sr−1m−2 at 1525 nm. Further optimization via BCF-doped PTAA boosts charge transport, enabling peak radiance up to ~17 W sr−1m−2 and a reduced turn-on voltage of 0.7 V. The devices also demonstrate a T80 operational lifetime up to 18 h under ambient, non-encapsulated conditions. To the best of our knowledge, this simultaneous achievement of long-wavelength emission, high efficiency, high radiance, and operational stability represents state-of-the-art performance for SWIR LEDs based on III-V CQDs (Supplementary Table 4), underscoring the strength and scalability of the proposed architecture.

Methods

Chemicals

Indium acetate (In(OAc)3, 99.99%), indium(III) iodide (InI3, 99.998%), 1-octadecene (ODE, 90%), oleic acid (OA, 90%), 1,1,3,3,5,5-hexamethyltrisiloxane (HMTS, 95%), Zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(OAc)2*2H2O), Tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane (BCF, 95%), methanol (MeOH, anhydrous, 99.8%) and toluene (anhydrous, 99.8%), Potassium hydroxide (KOH, 99.99%), Chloroform anhydrous (99.8%), Ethanol (EtOH, anhydrous) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Butanol (BuOH, 99.9%) was purchased from Thermo Scientific. Indium(I) chloride (In(I)Cl, 99.995%) was purchased from Apollo Scientific. Poly-[bis(4-phenyl)(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)]amine (PTAA) was purchased from Ossila. Tris(dimethylamino)arsine (amino-As) was purchased from DOCKWEILER CHEMICALS. Tri-n-octylphosphine (TOP, 97%) was purchased from STREM. Oleylamine (OLAm, 95%) was purchased from BIOSYNTH.

InAs-OLAm 1200−1400 nm core synthesis and oxidation

Using a modified version of a previously reported method12, 6 mL of OLAm was degassed at 100 °C for over 2 h. Subsequently, 0.3 mL of TOP, 225 mg of In(I)Cl, and 90 μL of amino-As were mixed at room temperature to form precursor clusters. To achieve the target wavelengths, the reaction was then carried out at 280, 290, or 300 °C for 1 h, yielding first excitonic absorption peaks at 1200, 1300, and 1400 nm, respectively. Finally, the purification process was conducted inside a glovebox using toluene and BuOH. First, an excess amount of BuOH was added to precipitate the crude CQDs. The resulting precipitate was redispersed in toluene, and a 1:1 toluene:BuOH volume ratio was used to selectively precipitate indium oxide and other reaction by-products. In the final purification step, the CQDs were precipitated using a toluene:BuOH volume ratio ranging from 1:2 to 1:4, depending on the CQD size. Each precipitation step was followed by centrifugation at approximately 2800 × g. The oxidation process was carried out at 20−23 °C and a relative humidity of 30% ± 5% for 12 h. A blue shift of approximately 25–35 meV was used as an additional criterion for confirming the targeted oxidation condition.

InAs/ZnSe-OLAm 1200-1400 nm core/shell synthesis

The synthesis was performed following a modified literature procedure26. Depending on the desired shell thickness, 5, 7.5, or 10 mL of OLAm (corresponding to approximately 7, 3-4, and 1-2 monolayers, respectively) was mixed with 50 mg of purified InAs cores and 463.4 mg of ZnCl2. This mixture was degassed at 110 °C for over 2 h. Separately, a 1 M TOP-Se precursor solution was prepared by stirring 268.5 mg of Se powder in 3.4 mL of TOP at 150 °C for at least 10 min. Following degassing, 1.7 mL of the TOP-Se solution was injected into the core mixture at 90 °C, and the temperature was subsequently raised to 300 °C. Upon reaching 300 °C, the remaining TOP-Se solution was continuously injected at a rate of 1.7 mL/h over a period of 1 h. Notably, 30 min after the start of this continuous injection, the reaction temperature was further increased to 320 °C for the remainder of the growth process. The crude reaction mixture was precipitated by adding BuOH at a crude:BuOH volume ratio of 1:1 to 1:2, followed by centrifugation at approximately 1,250 × g. The resulting precipitate was redispersed in toluene and centrifuged again at approximately 1,250 × g. The supernatant was then collected and filtered.

InAs-OA 850 nm core synthesis

The 850 nm InAs CQDs were synthesized using an OA-mediated method adapted from reported paper49. 440 mg of In(OAc)3 was loaded into a 50 mL three-neck round-bottom flask along with 1.5 mL of OA and 6 mL of ODE. The mixture was briefly degassed under vacuum at room temperature, then heated to 110 °C and degassed for 1 h under vacuum with magnetic stirring using a Schlenk line. After degassing, the atmosphere was switched to argon, and 0.3 mL of degassed TOP was injected. The solution was then heated to 245 °C. A mixed arsenic precursor solution was prepared by blending 90 µL of amino-As with 1.2 mL of HMTS. The injection was performed in two steps: first, 100 µL of the precursor mixture was injected at 0.66 mL/min to form the InAs seeds. For CQD growth, 1.2 mL of the arsenic precursor solution was dropwise added to the reaction mixture containing the seeds at a rate of 1.2 mL/h. After completion of the injection, the reaction was quenched by cooling to room temperature, and the solution was transferred into a glovebox under inert atmosphere for further handling. 4 mL of anhydrous toluene was added to the crude reaction mixture to redisperse and stabilize the CQDs. CQDs were then precipitated by adding BuOH in a 1:4 volume ratio (CQDs:BuOH) and centrifuging for 5 min at approximately 2800 × g. The precipitate was redispersed in 10 mL of toluene, followed by the addition of a 1:0.5 toluene:BuOH mixture, and centrifuged again at approximately 2800 × g for 5 min to remove most oxide byproducts. The resulting supernatant was collected, and 20 mL of BuOH was added to fully precipitate the CQDs. The pellet was redispersed in 5 mL of toluene and further precipitated by adding EtOH in a 1:1 ratio. Finally, the purified CQDs were redispersed in octane at a concentration of 40 mg/mL and stored under an inert atmosphere until device fabrication.

ZnO nanocrystal synthesis

ZnO nanocrystals were synthesized following a previously reported procedure50. Briefly, 2.95 g of Zn(OAc)2*2H2O was dissolved in 125 mL of MeOH under magnetic stirring at 60 °C in a 250 mL round-bottom flask. In parallel, 1.49 g of KOH was dissolved in 65 mL of MeOH. The KOH solution was added dropwise to the zinc acetate solution at a rate of 12 mL/min under magnetic stirring. The reaction mixture was maintained at 60 °C for 2.5 h. After cooling to room temperature, the ZnO nanocrystals were precipitated by centrifugation at approximately 2800 × g for 5 min and redispersed in fresh MeOH. This washing step was repeated twice (using 1:1 and 1:0.5 solvent-to-initial-volume ratios) to remove residual precursors and byproducts. The final white pellet was redispersed in chloroform containing 1 vol% butylamine to ensure colloidal stabilization.

Device fabrication

ITO-coated glass substrates were sequentially cleaned by ultrasonication for 30 min in the following solvents: detergent solution, deionized water, acetone, and isopropanol. The substrates were then treated under UV–ozone for 30 min to improve surface cleanliness and wettability. A ZnO nanocrystal layer (60 mg/mL in chloroform) was spin-coated at 3000 rpm for 35 s and immediately transferred into a nitrogen-filled glovebox without further annealing. Subsequently, an InAs-OA CQD layer (40 mg/mL in octane) was deposited by spin-coating at 2000 rpm for 15 s. For solid-state ligand exchange, a 5 mg/mL solution of InI3 in MeOH was drop-cast onto the film and allowed to react for 30 s. The substrate was then spin-coated at 2000 rpm for 45 s, during which the film was rinsed twice with MeOH and once with toluene to remove excess ligands and reaction by-products. The emissive layer, consisting of InAs/ZnSe CQDs (30 mg/mL in octane), was spin-coated at 2000 rpm, followed by a mild annealing step at 60 °C for 2 min to minimize erosion effects during subsequent processing. A PTAA solution (24 mg/mL in toluene, doped with an appropriate amount of BCF (2.5 or 5 wt%)) was then spin-coated onto the CQD layer and annealed at 90 °C for 20 min. Finally, the devices were transferred to a thermal evaporator, with air exposure kept below 15 min. MoOx (10 nm) and Au (100 nm) were sequentially deposited through a shadow mask that limited the pixel area to a circle of 3.14 mm2, at deposition rates of 0.1 Å/s and 1 Å/s, respectively, under a base pressure of ~7 × 10−6 mbar.

LED characterization

All devices were fabricated and characterized under ambient conditions. Current density–voltage–radiance (J-V-R) characteristics were measured using a computer-controlled source-measure unit (Keithley 2400). Radiance measurements were independently verified using a NIST-traceable Ge photodetector (Newport 818-IR) equipped with a calibrated DB15 module, ensuring consistency across the detection range. Electroluminescence spectra were collected through an optical fiber coupled to a spectrometer (Andor system, see Material Characterization), enabling spectral measurements in the range 800-1600 nm. The external quantum efficiency (EQE) and radiance were determined following the method described in reported paper1,51. Assuming Lambertian emission, the total optical flux emitted into the forward hemisphere is given by

Fext=π⋅L0 1

where L0 is the radiance normal to the emitting surface. The radiance was determined from the optical power measured by the photodetector according to

L0=Pdet⋅d2Sdet 2

where Pdet is the detected optical power measured through a 3.8mm2 pinhole, Sdet is the active area of the photodetector, and d is the distance between the device and the detector. The solid angle was determined by accounting for the device geometry and the thickness of the glass substrate. The EQE was then calculated as

EQE=π⋅Pdet⋅d2⋅λ⋅eSdet⋅h⋅c⋅I 3

where λ is the EL peak wavelength, I is the device current, e is the elementary charge, h is Planck’s constant, and c is the speed of light. The radiance was calculated as

R=Pdet⋅d2Sdet⋅SLED 4

where SLED is the emitting pixel area. Stability tests were performed without further encapsulation. Stability measurements were carried out under a controlled atmosphere. All devices were driven under a fixed current density of 100 mA cm−2. The power intensity was recorded as a function of time and is reported as normalized intensity.

Material characterization

Material characterization was carried out using complementary optical, spectroscopic, and structural techniques. UV-vis-NIR absorption spectra in solution were recorded using a Cary 5000 spectrophotometer. Steady-state photoluminescence (PL) measurements were performed using a multi-wavelength laser excitation source (Thorlabs) and detected with a Kymera 328i spectrograph, covering emission up to 1650 nm; absolute photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) was determined under 935 nm excitation using an integrating sphere coupled to an Andor detector system. Absolute PLQY was measured using an integrating sphere following the method of de Mello et al52. To correct the wavelength-dependent attenuation introduced by the PLQY optical path, the same broadband lamp was measured through (i) a reference fiber path that did not produce the 1400 nm attenuation feature (Iref) and (ii) the complete integrating-sphere/fiber configuration used for the PLQY measurements (Ifull), under otherwise identical acquisition conditions. The correction factor was calculated as Iref(λ)/Ifull(λ) and applied to the solution-phase PL spectra. For samples whose emission extended beyond the nominal detector range, the corrected spectrum within the directly measured range was fitted with a single Gaussian function, and only the unmeasured spectral tail was obtained from the fit. Extended-range detector measurements confirmed that no substantial additional emission component was present beyond the fitted range. Measurement repeatability was further confirmed by four consecutive measurements of the same sample at 3 h intervals, with a relative PLQY variation below 1%. Extended-range measurements using a detector covering wavelengths up to 2.2 μm confirmed the absence of substantial additional emission at longer wavelengths. In addition, the wavelength-dependent attenuation introduced by the integrating-sphere/fiber optical path was experimentally determined using broadband-lamp measurements and corrected as described in the Methods. These validation results are summarized in Supplementary Fig. 23. The reported absolute PLQY values carry an estimated relative instrumental uncertainty of approximately 7%, based on the detector quantum-efficiency and grating-efficiency calibrations. Furthermore, we observed that OLAm exhibits slight reabsorption in the infrared region, which decreases the measured PLQY by approximately 3%; however, no sample-specific correction was applied because the residual OLAm concentration could not be quantified accurately for each sample. Time-resolved PL (TRPL) measurements were conducted using a pulsed laser diode (827 nm, LDH-D-C-830), with emitted photons detected by a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector (ID281); photon arrival times were recorded via time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC) using an ID1000, and decay traces were reconstructed into intensity–time histograms and analyzed using Origin 2025. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) spectra were referenced to the C-C component of the adventitious C 1 s peak at 284.8 eV and analyzed using CasaXPS, with a Shirley background subtraction applied over the binding energy range of interest. The corresponding full-survey XPS spectra are shown in Supplementary Fig. 24. UPS measurements were performed in the same chamber using a He I discharge lamp (hν = 21.22 eV), with a pass energy of 10 eV and a dwell time of 100 ms; the work function (φ) was determined from the secondary electron cutoff (ESE), and the ionization energy (Eion) from the spectral width using the valence band maximum (EVBM), with ESE and EVBM extracted by linear fitting of the high- and low-binding-energy edges (±0.1 eV). Raman spectroscopy of thin films was performed using a Renishaw inVia confocal Raman microscope equipped with a 100× objective, maintaining laser power below 1 mW to minimize sample heating and degradation at room temperature. X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were collected on drop-cast powder samples using a Rigaku SmartLab diffractometer. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), including scanning TEM (STEM) and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS), was carried out at the Scientific and Technological Centres of the University of Barcelona using a JEOL 2100 F and a probe-corrected JEOL JEM ARM200F NEOARM operated at 200 kV, with EELS acquired using a Gatan GIF Continuum equipped with a K3 detector; samples were prepared by drop-casting CQD solutions onto ultrathin carbon grids.

Supplementary information

Source data

Source Data (5.7MB, zip)

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the Centros Científicos y Tecnológicos de la Universidad de Barcelona team for assistance with electron microscopy measurements and helpful discussions.

Author contributions

G.K. supervised and directed the study. G.K., T.K. and M.D.F. conceived the idea, designed the study, and co-wrote the manuscript, with feedback from all co-authors. T.K. led the materials synthesis, performed material characterization, and analyzed the data. M.D.F. synthesized materials, performed the material characterization, analyzed the data, fabricated and characterized the devices. M.D. contributed to PL and PL lifetime characterizations. R.B. contributed to Raman spectroscopy. J.T.O. performed XRD measurements. M.M.V. carried out SEM and EDS characterization. Ga.K. performed lateral current–voltage characteristics of polymer films.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Huaibin Shen and other anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Funding

G.K. discloses support for the research of this work from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [grant agreement no. 101002306], Project PID2024-161119OB-I00 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/FEDER, UE, MCIN with funding from the European Union NextGenerationEU (PRTR-C17.I1), and the Generalitat de Catalunya. Support was also provided by the Fundació Privada Cellex, the CERCA programme, and the ‘Severo Ochoa’ Centre of Excellence [CEX2024-001490-S; MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033]. T.K. discloses support for the research of this work from the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Education [RS-2024-00413533]. M.D.F. discloses support for the research of this work from MCIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 [JDC2024-053091-I] and FSE+ (Fondo Social Europeo Plus). R.B. discloses support for the research of this work from the European Union’s Horizon research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 101151468. M.M.V. discloses support for the research of this work from the European Union’s Horizon research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 101081441.

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the Article, its Supplementary Information and the accompanying Source Data files. Source data are provided with this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Taewan Kim, Manuela De Franco.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-77896-0.

References

  • 1.Pradhan, S., Dalmases, M., Taghipour, N., Kundu, B. & Konstantatos, G. Colloidal quantum dot light emitting diodes at telecom wavelength with 18% quantum efficiency and over 1 MHz bandwidth. Adv. Sci.9, 2200637 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bruns, O. T. et al. Next-generation in vivo optical imaging with short-wave infrared quantum dots. Nat. Biomed. Eng.1, 0056 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Goossens, S., Konstantatos, G. & Oikonomou, A. Colloidal quantum dot image sensors: technology and marketplace opportunities. Inf. Disp.37, 18–23 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pradhan, S. et al. High-efficiency colloidal quantum dot infrared light-emitting diodes via engineering at the supra-nanocrystalline level. Nat. Nanotechnol.14, 72–79 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Qu, J. et al. Electroluminescence from HgTe nanocrystals and its use for active imaging. Nano Lett20, 6185–6190 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gong, X. et al. Highly efficient quantum dot near-infrared light-emitting diodes. Nat. Photonics10, 253–257 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jalali, H. B., De Trizio, L., Manna, L. & Di Stasio, F. Indium arsenide quantum dots: an alternative to lead-based infrared emitting nanomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev.51, 9861–9881 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kim, T. et al. Development of Group III–V colloidal quantum dots for optoelectronic applications. ACS Energy Lett8, 447–456 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tessler, N., Medvedev, V., Kazes, M., Kan, S. & Banin, U. Efficient near-infrared polymer nanocrystal light-emitting diodes. Science295, 1506–1508 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim, T., Park, S. & Jeong, S. Diffusion dynamics controlled colloidal synthesis of highly monodisperse InAs nanocrystals. Nat. Commun.12, 3013 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Franke, D. et al. Continuous injection synthesis of indium arsenide quantum dots emissive in the short-wavelength infrared. Nat. Commun.7, 12749 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ginterseder, M. et al. Scalable synthesis of InAs quantum dots mediated through indium redox chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc.142, 4088–4092 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Skorotetcky, M. S. et al. Si-H hydrosilane reducing agents for size- and shape-controlled inas colloidal quantum dots. Adv. Mater.37, 2412105 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kim, M. et al. Surface-originated weak confinement in tetrahedral indium arsenide quantum dots. J. Am. Chem. Soc.146, 10251–10256 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhu, D. et al. Boosting the photoluminescence efficiency of inas nanocrystals synthesized with aminoarsine via a ZnSe thick-shell overgrowth. Adv. Mater.35, 2303621 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Panda, S. et al. Overcoming the short-wave infrared barrier in the photoluminescence of amino-as-based inas quantum dots. Adv. Opt. Mater.13, e01512 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.De Franco, M. et al. Near-infrared light-emitting diodes based on rohs-compliant InAs/ZnSe colloidal quantum dots. ACS Energy Lett7, 3788–3790 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Roshan, H. et al. Near Infrared Light-Emitting Diodes Based on Colloidal InAs/ZnSe Core/Thick-Shell Quantum Dots. Adv. Sci.11, 2400734 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Roshan, H. et al. Short-wave infrared inas quantum-dot light-emitting diodes with tunable electroluminescence beyond 1.4 μm. ACS Energy Lett11, 3764–3770 (2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ramasamy, P., Kim, N., Kang, Y.-S., Ramirez, O. & Lee, J.-S. Tunable, bright, and narrow-band luminescence from colloidal indium phosphide quantum dots. Chem. Mater.29, 6893–6899 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lim, J. et al. InP@ZnSeS, Core@composition gradient shell quantum dots with enhanced stability. Chem. Mater.23, 4459–4463 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chern, M., Nguyen, T. T., Mahler, A. H. & Dennis, A. M. Shell thickness effects on quantum dot brightness and energy transfer. Nanoscale9, 16446–16458 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ubbink, R. F. et al. Phosphorus oxidation controls epitaxial shell growth in InP/ZnSe quantum dots. ACS Nano19, 1150–1158 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ramasamy, P., Kim, B., Lee, M.-S. & Lee, J.-S. Beneficial effects of water in the colloidal synthesis of InP/ZnS core–shell quantum dots for optoelectronic applications. Nanoscale8, 17159–17168 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tessier, M. D. et al. Interfacial oxidation and photoluminescence of inp-based core/shell quantum dots. Chem. Mater.30, 6877–6883 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhu, D. et al. ZnCl2 Mediated synthesis of inas nanocrystals with aminoarsine. J. Am. Chem. Soc.144, 10515–10523 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rafipoor, M. et al. Strain in InP/ZnSe, S core/shell quantum dots from lattice mismatch and shell thickness—Material stiffness influence. J. Chem. Phys.151, 154704 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Reiss, P., Protière, M. & Li, L. Core/shell semiconductor nanocrystals. Small5, 154–168 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Demortière, A. et al. Strain-Driven Stacking Faults in CdSe/CdS Core/Shell Nanorods. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.9, 1900–1906 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jiang, Y. et al. 2D ferroelectric narrow-bandgap semiconductor Wurtzite’ type α-In2Se3 and its silicon-compatible growth. Nat. Commun.16, 7364 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kim, S. et al. Colloidal synthesis of P-Type Zn3As2 nanocrystals. Adv. Mater.36, 2310671 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xiang, J., Liu, Z.-X., Chen, H. & Li, C.-Z. Robust and sustainable indium anode leading to efficient and stable organic solar cells. Adv. Mater.35, 2303729 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhu, D. et al. Unveiling the role of ZnCl2 in enhancing the photoluminescence efficiency of amino-As-Based InAs@ZnSe Quantum Dots. ACS Nano19, 34807–34818 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhao, Y. et al. Strain evolution and confinement effect in InAs/AlAs short-period superlattices studied by Raman spectroscopy. Sci. Rep.13, 123 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pal, B. N. et al. ‘Giant’ CdSe/CdS Core/shell nanocrystal quantum dots as efficient electroluminescent materials: strong influence of shell thickness on light-emitting diode performance. Nano Lett12, 331–336 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kirkwood, N., Singh, B. & Mulvaney, P. Enhancing quantum dot LED efficiency by tuning electron mobility in the ZnO electron transport layer. Adv. Mater. Interfaces3, 1600868 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang, W. et al. Systematic improvement in charge carrier mobility of air stable triarylamine copolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc.131, 10814–10815 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang, S. et al. Operando ZnO recrystallization for efficient quantum-dot light-emitting diodes. Light Sci. Appl.14, 196 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Peng, L. et al. InSb/InP core–shell colloidal quantum dots for sensitive and fast short-wave infrared photodetectors. ACS Nano18, 5113–5121 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yeom, K. M. et al. Quantum barriers engineering toward radiative and stable perovskite photovoltaic devices. Nat. Commun.15, 4547 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Song, J. H., Choi, H., Pham, H. T. & Jeong, S. Energy level tuned indium arsenide colloidal quantum dot films for efficient photovoltaics. Nat. Commun.9, 4267 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chen, S. et al. Tri(4-trifluoromethylphenyl)phosphine-Modified Hole-Transport Material PTAA to Improve the Performance of Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. C127, 10929–10937 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ye, T. et al. Enhanced efficiency of planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells by a light soaking treatment on tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane-doped poly(triarylamine) solution. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces11, 14004–14010 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Marqués, P. S. et al. Understanding how Lewis acids dope organic semiconductors: a “complex” story. Chem. Sci.12, 7012–7022 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zheng, Y. et al. In situ n-doped nanocrystalline electron-injection-layer for general-lighting quantum-dot LEDs. Nat. Commun.16, 3362 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chen, Z. & Chen, S. Eliminating positive aging in quantum dot light-emitting diodes by h2o-treatment. Adv. Mater.37, 2503477 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ding, S. et al. Impact of the resistive switching effects in ZnMgO electron transport layer on the aging characteristics of quantum dot light-emitting diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett.117, 093501 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ghorbani, A. & Aziz, H. Hole-induced degradation of znmgo and insights into the causes of the limited electroluminescence stability of blue quantum dot light-emitting devices. ACS Appl. Opt. Mater.2, 2277–2285 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kim, T. et al. Ligand-mediated shape engineering of swir inas colloidal quantum dots for photodetector applications. Adv. Mater.38, e74004 (2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rath, A. K. et al. Remote trap passivation in colloidal quantum dot bulk nano-heterojunctions and its effect in solution-processed solar cells. Adv. Mater.26, 4741–4747 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jin, W. et al. On the accurate characterization of quantum-dot light-emitting diodes for display applications. Npj Flex. Electron.6, 35 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.de Mello, J. C., Wittmann, H. F. & Friend, R. H. An improved experimental determination of external photoluminescence quantum efficiency. Adv. Mater.9, 230–232 (1997). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Source Data (5.7MB, zip)

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the Article, its Supplementary Information and the accompanying Source Data files. Source data are provided with this paper.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES