Abstract
Atherosclerosis and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) share the same pathological triad, which includes chronic inflammation, immune cell infiltration, and extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation. Both diseases are characterized by the fact that the disease process may not be diagnosed until a life-threatening event occurs. Current imaging methods diagnose these conditions by assessing the degree of stenosis of the blood vessel, the plaque burden, and the aneurysm diameter. Unfortunately, these methods are not sufficient to measure biological activity, which is important to determine if such potentially life-threatening events will occur and where they will occur. Molecular imaging, together with computed tomography (CT), might close this gap. CT offers several benefits: it is widely available, allows rapid acquisition, can be integrated into vascular workflows, and can provide quantitative signal readout, but its main use has been in the context of anatomical detail. Recent preclinical studies suggest that a shift may be occurring in this area. This review examines the use of molecular CT imaging for the diagnosis of atherosclerosis and AAA, systematically grouped by molecular target. There are three different approaches that are employed in the current literature. The most clinically advanced is the first, macrophage-targeted probes. The second, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-mimetic nanoparticles, takes advantage of an endogenous lipoprotein pathway, but not an engineered ligand. The third, gold nanoparticles, which targeted elastin, yielded the most clinically relevant finding to date: ex vivo signal correlates inversely with aortic wall burst pressure, casting doubt on whether diameter is sufficient to assess for rupture. Comparable methods for targeting biomarkers with CT have not been developed, although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nuclear imaging modalities can already target matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and microcalcification. This is a space that could be very fruitful for future studies.
Keywords: molecular imaging, computed tomography (CT), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), atherosclerosis, targeted contrast agents
Introduction
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are a collection of diseases of the heart and blood vessels. They remain one of the main causes of death around the world 1. Around 19.8 million people died from CVD in 2022, accounting for around 32% of all deaths. Over three-quarters of these were in low- and middle-income countries 2. Atherosclerosis is a long-term inflammatory disease of large and medium arteries, defined by lipid accumulation and plaque formation 3, 4. AAA is caused by progressive degeneration of the aortic wall and abnormal remodeling of the extracellular matrix. These two conditions are among the most important types of arterial disease in clinical practice 5 and progress quietly over many years 6, 7. Atherosclerosis may cause heart attacks, strokes, or arterial blockages in the limbs, whereas AAA can result in aortic rupture 5, 8, 9. Each of these outcomes constitutes a life-threatening event.
Acute cardiovascular events often originate from atherosclerotic lesions that do not result in hemodynamically significant stenosis 10, 11. In AAA, the biological mechanisms leading to wall failure progress independently of aneurysm diameter 12. Therefore, diameter can only be used as a limited surrogate for rupture risk 13. In both, the anatomy of the vessel is not a representative indicator of disease activity. Anatomical imaging alone cannot fully reveal important biological processes such as chronic inflammation, ECM breakdown, and active microcalcification 14, 15. This has led to an increasing interest in imaging biomarkers reflecting vessel wall biology rather than just its structure. Early detection of these changes is important for timely, biology-based treatment before they become a major event.
CT has distinct advantages over other imaging modalities: it is widely available, often used in clinics, and provides detailed, quantitative images of vascular wall structures. These strengths make it a good choice for translational molecular imaging. This review discusses current targeted CT contrast agents and emerging molecular CT imaging techniques for atherosclerosis and AAA. It also reviews current preclinical evidence and its potential for translation to the biological characterization of the vessel wall.
Structural organization of the arterial wall
The arterial system
The arterial system serves as the principal conduit for blood distribution and is integral to the development of cardiovascular diseases. Age-related and pathological changes, such as increased wall stiffness, endothelial dysfunction, and progressive loss of elasticity, increase the arterial wall's susceptibility to damage 16. Understanding the structural organization of the arterial wall provides a basis for understanding arterial pathologies, including atherosclerosis and AAA. The arterial system consists of large and medium arteries, which are structurally and functionally distinct vessel types that jointly enable blood transport, pressure regulation, and tissue perfusion 17.
Arteries facilitate the transport of blood from the heart to other parts of the body. They are divided into elastic and muscular arteries. Elastic arteries, such as the aorta and other large vessels, possess an elastin-rich medial layer that enables them to buffer pulsatile pressure and sustain continuous downstream blood flow 18, 19. This ability, called the Windkessel function, reduces the heart's workload and smooths out blood flow in smaller arteries further from the heart 18. Muscular arteries, such as the femoral, radial, and coronary arteries, are distinguished by a higher proportion of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), which allow active regulation of blood flow to specific organs (Figure 1) 20, 21.
Figure 1.

Arterial wall architecture. Schematic cross sections of an elastic artery (left) and a muscular artery (right), showing the three-layered structure of the wall, tunica intima, tunica media, and tunica adventitia. Elastic arteries have a thick media that is rich in elastin, while muscular arteries have a greater percentage of VSMCs in the media. Figure created with BioRender.com.
Arterioles, also called resistance vessels, are small arteries that connect muscular arteries to capillaries. They regulate systemic vascular resistance and local blood flow by coordinating endothelial cell and VSMC function 22, 23. Capillaries are the smallest blood vessels and consist solely of endothelium and a basement membrane. They link the arteries and veins. Through their thin walls, they facilitate the exchange of gases, nutrients, and metabolic by-products between blood and tissue 24, 25.
All arteries, despite their different functions, have the same basic three-layered wall structure: the tunica intima, tunica media, and tunica adventitia (Figure 1). These layers collectively confer mechanical stability and elasticity while continuing vascular homeostasis 26-28. Table 1 summarizes the composition and function of each layer.
Table 1.
Composition and function of arterial wall layers
| Layer | Composition | Main function | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tunica intima | Endothelial cells with surface glycocalyx basal lamina internal elastic lamina |
Barrier function regulation of vascular tone, permeability, coagulation, and inflammation |
26, 28-30 |
| Tunica media | VSMCs embedded in elastin- and collagen-rich ECM elastic lamellae |
Provides elasticity and compliance enables vasoconstriction and vasodilation structural support |
26-28, 31, 32 |
| Tunica adventitia | Fibroblasts in collagen- and elastin-rich ECM nerves vasa vasorum |
Mechanical stability, vascular repair, and signaling | 26, 27, 33, 34 |
VSMCs: vascular smooth muscle cells; ECM: extracellular matrix
The ECM plays a major role in determining the mechanical properties of the arterial wall. Its composition and turnover are key to maintaining wall stability and supporting remodeling 35, 36.
The extracellular matrix
The ECM is primarily composed of fibrous proteins, glycoproteins, and proteoglycans in a three-dimensional scaffold. The ECM is the structural framework for the vessel wall and plays a major role in the mechanical properties of the wall, and the composition and turnover of the ECM are important in regulating aspects of cellular behavior 35-38. The VSMCs are the predominant source of ECM components in the tunica media of the arterial wall, while the tunica adventitia is the source of matrix production by the fibroblasts 39.
Elastin is the main component of elastic fibers and the reason for maintaining the flexibility of large arteries. Elastin is arranged in concentric elastic lamellae, which allow the conducting arteries, such as the aorta, to expand during systole and contract during diastole. This process dampens fluctuations in blood pressure and ensures a steady flow of blood. A gradual loss or breakdown of elastin makes arteries less flexible and weakens their walls 18.
The collagen fibers are primarily type I and III, and they provide strength and reduce excessive distention of the vessels under hemodynamic stress. Impaired collagen production or breakdown leads to pathological remodeling and a weakened vessel wall 35.
Although fibrin is not a permanent component of the ECM, it is an important part of the process of repairing blood vessels. Once endothelial cells have been disrupted, thrombin converts fibrinogen to fibrin monomers that polymerize to create a provisional thrombus. Factor XIIIa cross-links fibrin polymers, forming a mechanically stable structure that is important for wound sealing and cell migration 40-42.
Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans control matrix organization and cell signaling through their ability to bind cytokines, growth factors, and lipoproteins 43-45. They have high water binding capacity that helps to maintain matrix hydration 46 and binding and migration to cell surface receptors 38.
Matrix remodeling
The ECM is maintained in a dynamic state of balance between ongoing synthesis and proteolysis. The MMPs are zinc-dependent enzymes that mainly degrade collagen and elastin, and other ECM components 39. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMP) regulate MMP activity, resulting in a controlled balance in healthy tissue 47, 48. An imbalance of this can lead to reduced arterial wall stability, either because of increased MMP activity or because of changes in TIMP levels. These alterations promote the destabilization of atherosclerotic plaques and the progression of AAA 49.
Pathophysiology and clinical imaging of atherosclerosis and AAA
Atherosclerosis
Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease of large and medium-sized arteries. It is defined as the development of lipid-rich plaques in the wall of the vessel, and is the principal pathological substrate of several major CVDs 50-53. Endothelial dysfunction is a primary event in the initiation of the disease, whereby the endothelial barrier and regulatory functions of the arterial wall are impaired 54. In addition to these, elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol 55 and modifiable risk factors such as high blood pressure, diabetes, obesity, and smoking 50, 56, and non-modifiable risk factors such as age, sex, and genetic predisposition play a role in disease development 50, 57, 58. The key cellular mechanisms and stages of atherosclerotic progression are summarized in Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Atherosclerosis disease progression. Endothelial dysfunction promotes LDL infiltration and oxidation, inducing adhesion molecule expression (VCAM-1, ICAM-1) and monocyte recruitment. Monocytes differentiate into macrophages and lipid-laden foam cells, which, together with VSMC migration, ECM deposition, fibrous cap formation, necrotic core development, and calcification, drive plaque progression. MMP-mediated cap degradation can result in plaque destabilization, rupture, thrombosis, and myocardial infarction. Abbreviations: ECM: extracellular matrix; ICAM-1: intercellular adhesion molecule 1; IL-6: interleukin-6; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; MMP: matrix metalloproteinase; oxLDL: oxidized low-density lipoprotein; T.: Tunica; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor alpha; VCAM-1: vascular cell adhesion molecule 1; VSMC: vascular smooth muscle cell. Based on 59-61. Figure created with BioRender.com.
Impaired endothelial permeability, likely caused by endothelial dysfunction, allows infiltration of LDL into the intima and its oxidation into oxidized LDL (oxLDL) 54. OxLDL induces pro-inflammatory responses by activating endothelial cells and upregulates the expression of adhesion molecules such as VCAM-1 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 promote the recruitment and transmigration of circulating monocytes into the vessel wall 56. Once within the intima, monocytes differentiate into macrophages, which internalize oxLDL and transform into lipid-laden foam cells. This sequence defines the early stage of fatty streak formation, a process that can begin during childhood 7, 58, 62.
Foam cells and oxLDL sustain local inflammation and facilitate the recruitment of additional immune cells 63-65. Defective efferocytosis, the process by which apoptotic cells are cleared by phagocytes, results in the accumulation of extracellular lipids, cellular debris, and cholesterol crystals, which promotes necrotic core formation 66. Macrophages with a pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype release cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), consequently sustaining vascular inflammation as well as promoting lesion progression. In contrast, anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages are more abundant in stable plaques and are linked to tissue repair and lesion regression 67. VSMCs migrate into the inner layer of the artery, proliferate, and produce components of the ECM 63, 68. This leads to the formation of a fibrous cap, mostly collagen, that covers the fatty core of the plaque 68, 69.
Lesion progression results in ongoing inflammatory activity, which leads to ECM remodeling inside the plaque. MMPs derived from the macrophages break down collagen in the fibrous cap, resulting in a progressive reduction in cap thickness and tensile strength 70, 71. A thin or weakened fibrous cap is a feature of vulnerable plaques and a risk factor for plaque rupture 69, 72.
Vascular calcification occurs at the same time. This is achieved by passive calcium-phosphate deposition as well as by the activation of osteogenic differentiation of smooth muscle cells 73, 74. The pattern matters clinically. Microcalcifications in the fibrous cap are thought to be a feature that creates mechanical stress, leading to plaque rupture, while macrocalcification is thought to be a stabilizing feature 73, 75. Once a plaque is unstable or ruptures, the thrombogenic material is exposed to the blood. This exposure can lead to the formation of a thrombus that can cause myocardial infarction, stroke, or peripheral ischemia, depending on the vessel involved 76, 77.
The phenotype of plaques is determined by a combination of morphological features such as necrotic core size, fibrous cap integrity, and calcification pattern, and has a significant effect on the rupture risk. Lesions that lead to the development of acute cardiovascular events, like myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke, are often without the presence of a hemodynamically significant stenosis 10, 11. Therefore, identifying biologically active, rupture-prone plaques, regardless of stenosis severity, remains a major unresolved challenge in the clinical management of atherosclerotic disease.
Abdominal aortic aneurysms
AAA is defined as the localized and sustained dilation of the abdominal aorta with changes in the wall structure. AAA is one of the most common types of aneurysms 78. It affects about 4% of men and 2% of women over 65 years old, and if it ruptures, the risk of death is over 80% 78-82. Diagnostically, an aneurysm is defined as a permanent localized dilation of an artery with an increase in diameter of at least 50% compared to the expected normal diameter of the artery in question 83 or, in practice, as an absolute diameter of ≥ 30 mm 84. Because the course of AAA is often so asymptomatic, the condition is often found later in the course. At present, there is no pharmacologic therapy that can slow the growth of an aneurysm or decrease the risk of an aneurysm rupturing 85, 86.
When detected, the AAA are categorized based on their size as small (< 55 mm) or large (≥ 55 mm) 87. Treatment of small aneurysms is generally aimed towards watchful waiting with periodic imaging surveillance. On the other hand, those aneurysms that are more than 55 mm are treated surgically, due to the high risk of rupture. Female patients will often have lower thresholds of intervention 88, 89. Intervention is the main therapeutic approach, with improvements in endovascular and surgical procedures in high-risk AAAs 90.
While there are similarities in risk factors associated with both AAA and atherosclerosis (such as age, male gender, smoking, hypertension, and family history), the pathogenesis is quite distinct 91. Atherosclerosis involves mostly the degradation of the ECM of plaques in the intima, while in AAA tissue remodeling and abnormalities occur throughout the aortic wall 92-94. Furthermore, diabetes mellitus, a well-established risk factor for atherosclerosis, is associated with a lower risk of AAA 95, 96, which further suggests that these conditions are pathobiologically different entities 97. Notably, several studies have reported an association between metformin use and both lower AAA incidence and reduced growth rate 98, 99.
Three closely interconnected processes are involved in the development of AAA – chronic inflammation, loss of VSMCs, and ECM degradation – 93, 100-102. A series of such mechanisms is dynamic, interacting intimately and reinforcing each other in an order not predetermined but rather emergent 103.
No single cause has been established, but tobacco smoke is the most significant modifiable risk factor for AAA; whereas the presence of atherosclerotic lesions and hypercholesterolemia might play a role in the development of AAA, but do not necessarily trigger it 78, 104.
Early stages of AAA are associated with inflammation, which is typically characterized by elastin degradation, representing one of the initial events in ECM remodeling 105. Aortic wall compliance is significantly reduced at the time of loss of elastin and sets off a self-propagating inflammatory cascade 106. Activated VSMCs increase inflammation by producing increased levels of pro-inflammatory mediators. Elastin degradation products also attract immune cells from the blood to enhance local inflammation 91. Immune cells are recruited as a result of inflammatory chemokines and cytokines, which allow for infiltration of leukocytic cells, such as monocytes, into the wall of the aneurysm 107. Continued accumulation of monocyte-derived macrophages and other leukocytes increases protease activity, mainly through the upregulation of MMP expression, thus promoting ECM degradation and aortic wall weakening 100. These immune cells produce pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and TNF-α, sustaining inflammation and recruiting further immune cells 108. Although the pro-inflammatory M1 macrophage state is a hallmark of the progression of AAA, M2 macrophages have anti-inflammatory and tissue-repairing properties. The ratio of M1 and M2 macrophages in the aneurysmal wall is increasingly recognized as an important factor of disease progression 109. In addition, chronic inflammation leads to neovascularization of the medial walls, which allows further infiltration of immune cells and helps sustain the inflammatory milieu 100.
At the same time, the process of oxidative stress in the wall of the aneurysm causes a rise in proteolytic activity, which results in apoptosis of endothelial cells and VSMCs 110. As the disease progresses, other immune cell types, including T lymphocytes and neutrophils, also contribute to raising the inflammatory response 111.
Both conditions show the same imbalance in matrix turnover: reduced TIMP levels alongside elevated MMP-2 and MMP-9, resulting in accelerated ECM degradation 112, 113. The most important pathological mechanisms contributing to AAA disease progression are depicted in Figure 3 and include inflammation and ECM degradation.
Figure 3.

AAA disease progression. Chronic inflammation and protease activation drive ECM degradation within the aortic wall. Increased expression of MMPs promotes fragmentation of elastin and collagen, leading to medial weakening and VSMC apoptosis. Chemokine-mediated recruitment of monocytes, lymphocytes, and neutrophils amplifies inflammation by releasing cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6. Neovascularization further facilitates immune cell infiltration. Progressive wall destabilization ultimately results in aneurysm expansion and rupture. Abbreviations: ECM: extracellular matrix; IL-1β: interleukin-1 beta; IL-6: interleukin-6; MMP: matrix metalloproteinase; T.: Tunica; TIMP: tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor alpha; VSMC: vascular smooth muscle cell. Figure created with BioRender.com based on 112, 114, 115.
Importantly, the biological processes that underlie the development of aneurysms in atherosclerosis are spatially and temporally variable and do not depend on aneurysm size 12. The biological nature of aortic wall failure makes the AAA more aptly described as a disease of progressive inflammation than any disease of aortic diameter, and diameter-based criteria are a limited surrogate for biological disease activity and for aortic wall rupture risk 13.
Clinical imaging of atherosclerosis and AAA
Non-invasive imaging is key for diagnosing, monitoring, and assessing the risk of atherosclerosis and AAA 116, 117. Clinical modalities include ultrasound (US), MRI, CT, and nuclear medicine techniques like positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) 118, 119. There are differences in the capabilities of each method for anatomical detail, soft tissue imaging, molecular sensitivity, and clinical utility 117.
In clinical practice, US is widely used as the primary imaging method as its inexpensive, non-invasive, and easily accessible. It is the recommended technique for AAA screening and surveillance and is often used to determine the severity of carotid artery stenosis 116, 120. For comprehensive anatomical assessment and pre-interventional planning, computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the modality of choice and the gold standard for preoperative imaging of AAA 88, 89, and is increasingly used in the initial evaluation of atherosclerotic disease when intervention is considered 121, 122. The high spatial resolution and rapid image acquisition of CTA allow for detailed analysis of stenosis severity, plaque burden, calcification patterns, aneurysm diameter, branch vessel anatomy, and intraluminal thrombus 117. Furthermore, CTA can characterize plaque vulnerability by identifying high-risk morphological features, including low-attenuation plaque, positive remodeling, spotty calcification, and napkin-ring sign, which are all associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes 123.
MRI has excellent soft-tissue contrast and provides detailed information about the composition of the vessel wall and plaque, such as intraplaque hemorrhage and lipid-rich necrotic core 124. PET – and, to a lesser extent, SPECT – provides highly sensitive detection of molecular disease activity, including vascular inflammation and active microcalcification 125, 126, but remains limited to selected clinical indications and research settings due to restricted availability, higher costs, and limited spatial resolution 126, 127.
Anatomical imaging alone cannot capture the biological processes that characterize both conditions, including chronic inflammation, ECM degradation, and active microcalcification 14, 15. Consequently, research interest has shifted toward imaging biomarkers that directly reflect these biological processes. CT is a plausible candidate for this purpose. CT is widely available, provides inherently quantitative signals, and offers sufficient spatial resolution to resolve the vessel wall.
Nanoparticle-based CT contrast agents by molecular target
To resolve these limitations, targeted nanoparticle-based contrast agents have been developed to extend CT beyond anatomical assessment toward the visualization of disease-associated biological processes, including inflammatory cell infiltration, ECM remodeling, and microcalcification. Current preclinical evidence for these strategies is presented by molecular target, rather than by disease entity. This structure underlines common pathobiological mechanisms of atherosclerosis and AAA and points to a potential therapeutic target for imaging markers for vascular diseases.
Macrophage targeting strategies for CT imaging
Macrophages play a key role in the destabilization of atherosclerotic plaques and progression of AAA, through the promotion of chronic inflammation, ECM degradation, and foam cell formation 55, 103. As already mentioned, in both disease entities, macrophage phenotype plays a crucial role in disease course: pro-inflammatory type M1 macrophages are involved in maintaining inflammation and the tissue destruction; anti-inflammatory type M2 macrophages are associated with tissue repair and the stabilization of lesions. Their phagocytic activity offers a biologically tractable targeting mechanism: nanoparticles injected intravenously are naturally phagocytosed by blood monocytes and tissue-resident macrophages, allowing them to be passively targeted in areas of vascular inflammation, without receptor interaction 128. Passive uptake, however, is a measure of macrophage numbers, not their activation state, and does not differentiate M1, pro-inflammatory, from M2, reparative. This concept has been incorporated into many of the early iodine-based, as well as the more recent metal-based nanoparticles and receptor-mediated targeting contrast agents.
Iodine-based nanoparticles
The first macrophage-targeted CT imaging was demonstrated by Hyafil et al. They administered N1177 (Figure 4B) – crystalline iodinated nanoparticles dispersed with biocompatible surfactants – intravenously in a rabbit model of balloon-injury-induced aortic atherosclerosis (Figure 4A). They demonstrated that macrophage infiltration could be detected on a 64-slice clinical CT scanner 2 hours after injection (Figure 4C, a-d) 128. Plaque enhancement was significantly greater than with conventional iodinated contrast agents, iopamidol (P < 0.001). Moreover, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and energy-dispersive spectroscopy revealed the accumulation of nanoparticles in the lysosomes of macrophages. Macrophage infiltration (> 20% of intimal area) was seen in 90% of histological sections associated with plaques exceeding the enhancement threshold. This discovery made a quantitative correlation between CT signal and macrophage load 128. The spatial association between N1177 signal and plaque localization was confirmed with color-coded density maps, co-registered with CT angiography, and no enhancement was seen in control animals (Figure 4C, e-g).
Figure 4.

Iodinated nanoparticle CT imaging of plaque macrophages (N1177). (A) Targeting mechanism: in hypercholesterolemic rabbits with balloon-injury aortic plaques, iodinated nanoparticles (iodine NP) are phagocytosed by plaque macrophages, increasing CT signal. (B) N1177 iodinated compound: 6-ethoxy-6-oxohexyl 3,5-diacetamido-2,4,6-triiodobenzoate (C₁₉H₂₃I₃N₂O₆), an esterified diatrizoate derivative (three iodine atoms in red); its low aqueous solubility yields surfactant-stabilized nanoparticles (~259 nm) taken up by macrophages. (C) In vivo macrophage-targeted CT with N1177 (clinical 64-slice scanner): axial CT of the same plaque (arrowheads) before, during, and 2 h after N1177 (a–c) or a conventional agent (d), with enhancement after N1177 only; attenuation-coded regions fused to the aortic angiogram show intense red plaque signal with N1177 (e), absent with the conventional agent (f) and in a control rabbit (g). Plaque density rose 29.7 ± 6.0 → 43.0 ± 7.3 HU (net 13.3 ± 1.0 vs 4.1 ± 0.9 HU, P < 0.001). Arrowhead, plaque; arrow, plaque enhancement; asterisk, spleen; color scale, HU (-182 to 583); scale bar, 5 mm. Figure created with BioRender.com. Panel (C) adapted with permission from 128, copyright 2007 Springer Nature. The chemical structure in (B) was drawn by the authors using ChemDraw. CT, computed tomography; HU, Hounsfield units; NP, nanoparticle.
A further iodine-based approach was explored by Bhavane et al., who encapsulated iodixanol within liposomal nanoparticles and demonstrated their feasibility for macrophage imaging in apolipoprotein E-deficient (ApoE-/-) mice using dual-energy CT 129. Spectral decomposition allowed iodine signal to be separated from calcified plaque deposits, and image-based cytometry confirmed liposome colocalization with approximately 2% of plaque macrophages – a small fraction reflecting the limited uptake efficiency of the non-targeted formulation, yet sufficient for CT-based plaque detection, as the authors note 129.
Metal-based nanoparticles
The next investigations compared the use of gold nanoparticles as an alternative to iodine, with their better X-ray attenuating capacity and design flexibility. Qin et al. have created a new type of gold nanoparticle-based dendrimer that is functionalized with polyethylene glycol (PEG) and is fluorescently labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate. These particles were efficiently internalized by macrophages in vitro and enabled noninvasive, dynamic three-dimensional micro-CT imaging of macrophage burden in atherosclerotic lesions of ApoE-/- mice in vivo. Silver staining and CD68 immunohistochemistry confirmed that nanoparticles were accumulated within plaque macrophages 130. Another unique strategy was taken by Chhour et al., which involved ex vivo labeling of primary monocytes with 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid-capped gold nanoparticles, allowing the monitoring of monocyte recruitment to developing plaques using micro-CT 131. Mice with gold-labeled monocytes showed a greater increase in aortic attenuation than did the control mice (Δ15.3 Hounsfield unit (HU), P = 0.002); gold nanoparticles were detected in excised plaques by TEM in the monocytes 131. This type of cell labeling enables direct visualization of the migratory behavior of circulating monocytes, unlike other passive targeting strategies. This, however, has to be achieved by ex vivo cell processing, which is a significant hurdle towards clinical translation. Kosuge et al. demonstrated in vivo CT imaging with intravenously injected non-targeted gold nanoparticles in two distinct disease models: a carotid ligation model in hyperlipidemic and diabetic FVB mice and an angiotensin II-induced AAA model in ApoE-/- mice 132. While CT attenuation values in the perivascular area of AAAs were significantly elevated compared to uninjected controls (P = 0.0001) (Figure 5B), the difference in the carotid atherosclerosis model did not reach statistical significance, which the authors attributed to the smaller inflammatory area in the ligated carotid artery relative to the abdominal aorta.
Figure 5.

Metal-based nanoparticles for macrophage-mediated CT imaging of AAA. (A) Targeting mechanism: in the ApoE⁻ᐟ⁻ + Ang II model, metal nanoparticles are phagocytosed by adventitial macrophages, increasing CT signal. Created with BioRender.com. (B) Gold nanoparticles (AuroVist, 15 nm): perivascular CT attenuation rises after injection (GNPs) but not in uninjected controls (No injection), at preinjection/24 h/48 h (P = 0.0001); yellow arrow, perivascular AAA. Adapted with permission from 132, copyright 2021 the authors, CC BY 4.0. (C) Barium sulfate nanoparticles (Exitron nano 12000, ~79 nm): after blood-pool clearance the aneurysm wall opacifies at 24 h in ApoE⁻ᐟ⁻ + Ang II mice but not in C57Bl/6J controls (pre-contrast/5 min/24 h; enhancement in the hundreds of HU, CD68-correlated, r = 0.85). White arrow, AAA; red, inferior vena cava; grey, aorta. Adapted with permission from 133, copyright 2021 the authors, CC BY 4.0. Figure created with BioRender.com. AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm; Ang II, angiotensin II; ApoE⁻ᐟ⁻, apolipoprotein E-deficient; CT, computed tomography; GNP, gold nanoparticle; HU, Hounsfield unit; NP, nanoparticle.
Toczek et al. extended the principle of phagocytic CT imaging to AAA, employing Exitron nano 12000 – a commercially available barium sulfate nanoparticle contrast agent – in angiotensin II-infused ApoE-/- mice 133. Following intravenous injection, delayed CT imaging at 24 hours demonstrated significant aortic wall enhancement (Figure 5C) that correlated with CD68 gene expression (r = 0.85; P < 0.001), and TEM confirmed nanoparticle accumulation within macrophages of the remodeled adventitia. Notably, nanoparticle-enhanced CT signal obtained within the first week of AAA induction was predictive of aneurysm diameter and survival at four weeks, directly linking early inflammatory CT signal to disease outcome 133.
Receptor-mediated targeting
A conceptually different approach is based on receptor overexpression on activated macrophages for active targeting, as described in the studies above. Guo et al. developed palladium-gold nanosheets with PEG coating (Pd@Au-PEG-FA), functionalized to target the folate receptor-β (FR-β), which is selectively upregulated on pro-inflammatory macrophages and foam cells in advanced atherosclerotic plaques 134. Histological analysis of ApoE-/- mice confirmed the co-localization of FR-β with CD68+ macrophages, with high FR-β expression associated with thin fibrous caps and large necrotic cores. There were two examples of targeting specificity. First, a competitive blocking experiment showed that pre-injection of excess folic acid reduced the artery-to-background ratio from 1.94 ± 0.19 to 1.08 ± 0.05, effectively abolishing the specific signal. Second, no significant aortic signal was observed in wild-type controls or animals injected with non-targeted nanosheets 134. In vivo CT imaging showed aortic wall enhancement in the bloodstream after 30 minutes, highlighting the potential for real-time CT imaging of plaque with this platform; however, the long-term persistence and specificity to background uptake in the liver and kidneys remain to be evaluated.
Together, these studies illustrate the potential of macrophage-targeted CT imaging of vascular disease using various types of nanoparticles and disease models, such as iodine-, metal-, and receptor-targeted nanoparticles. The field has moved beyond simple proof-of-concept demonstrations and is now quantifying macrophage burden in vivo, with direct prognostic implications, such as the ability to predict AAA outcome from early CT enhancement. However, there are still serious challenges for clinical translation, including insufficient signal sensitivity at clinically acceptable doses, the lack of approved human-use nanoparticle CT contrast agents, and the inability of passive phagocytic targeting to distinguish between M1 and M2 macrophage activation states.
HDL-based nanoparticle CT contrast agents
A biologically distinct but mechanistically related targeting strategy exploits the natural affinity of HDL for macrophage-rich atherosclerotic plaques. HDL is an endogenous lipoprotein particle that naturally accumulates in atherosclerotic lesions during reverse cholesterol transport 135. Its affinity for macrophage-rich plaques provides a biologically relevant targeting mechanism for molecular imaging. Cormode et al. exploited this by replacing the hydrophobic lipid core of HDL with inorganic nanocrystals while preserving the apolipoprotein surface (Figure 6B), creating HDL-mimetic contrast agents that retain HDL's natural affinity for macrophage-rich tissue 136, 137. The gold nanocrystal variant (Au-HDL) was of particular interest for CT imaging owing to the high X-ray attenuation of gold, and macrophage specificity was confirmed in vitro by confocal microscopy and TEM. Preferential uptake over PEG-coated control particles was consistent with receptor-mediated internalization via SR-B1 (Scavenger Receptor Class B Type 1) and ABCA1 (ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter A1), the primary macrophage receptors for HDL (Figure 6A) 136.
Figure 6.

Au-HDL for molecular CT imaging of plaque macrophages. (A) Targeting mechanism: in ApoE⁻ᐟ⁻ plaques, Au-HDL is taken up by macrophages via SR-B1 (ABCA1 shown for context). (B) Au-HDL architecture: gold core, phospholipid monolayer (MHPC, Gd-DTPA-DMPE, Rhod-DMPE), and apoA-I. (C) Representative CT imaging. Left, ex vivo micro-CT: selective Au-HDL accumulation in macrophage-rich plaque, absent with Au-PEG and control. Right, ex vivo spectral CT (frozen specimen): plaque-specific Au-HDL (gold), distinct from the iodine-filled lumen. Figure created with BioRender.com. Panel (B and Ca) adapted with permission from 136, copyright 2008 American Chemical Society. Panel (Cb) adapted with permission from 137, copyright 2010 Radiological Society of North America. ABCA1, ATP-binding cassette transporter A1; apoA-I, apolipoprotein A-I; ApoE⁻ᐟ⁻, apolipoprotein E-deficient; Au-HDL, gold-core high-density lipoprotein nanoparticle; Au-PEG, PEGylated gold nanoparticle; CT, computed tomography; Gd-DTPA-DMPE, gadolinium-DTPA-dimyristoylphosphatidylethanolamine; MHPC, 1-myristoyl-2-hydroxy-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; PEG, polyethylene glycol; Rhod-DMPE, rhodamine-dimyristoylphosphatidylethanolamine; SR-B1, scavenger receptor class B type 1.
In ApoE-/- mice with established atherosclerosis, intravenous administration of Au-HDL produced significant signal enhancement in the aortic wall on MRI (139 ± 25% for Au-HDL versus 35 ± 11% for PEG-coated gold nanoparticle control particles (Au-PEG) controls), while ex vivo micro-CT of excised aortas revealed discrete high-attenuation foci colocalizing with macrophage-rich regions at histology. These foci corresponded to sites of known plaque accumulation, such as the aortic arch and renal artery bifurcation, and their absence in Au-PEG-injected animals confirmed the preferential uptake of the HDL-mimetic nanoparticles by macrophage-rich plaque regions. (Figure 6Ca) 136.
Building on this platform, Cormode et al. subsequently demonstrated that Au-HDL could be combined with prototype spectral CT technology to enable simultaneous material-specific decomposition of gold, iodine, and calcium in a single scan 137. In atherosclerotic mice co-injected with Au-HDL and an iodinated vascular contrast agent, gold K-edge images presented Au-HDL accumulation in the plaque wall, while iodine images delineated the vessel lumen and calcium images identified calcified structures, providing composite information on macrophage burden, stenosis, and calcification without requiring separate acquisitions (Figure 6Cb) 137. However, the imaging system used was a single-row preclinical prototype with prohibitively long scanning times, precluding in vivo acquisition; spectral CT imaging was therefore performed on intact frozen whole-body specimens rather than under physiological conditions, illustrating the hardware constraints that continue to limit the clinical applicability of spectral CT-based molecular imaging 137.
Collectively, these studies demonstrate that Au-HDL nanoparticles enable targeted molecular imaging of macrophage burden in atherosclerotic plaques, with in vivo signal assessment achieved by MRI and material-specific plaque characterization demonstrated by ex vivo spectral CT. While this combined approach provides diagnostic insights into plaque composition beyond conventional anatomical CT, achieving sufficient in vivo CT signal sensitivity is an essential prerequisite before this Au-HDL-based imaging can be considered for clinical application.
Elastin as a molecular target for CT imaging
Elastin fragmentation is a structurally stable and disease-specific marker of AAA growth and a potentially appropriate molecular target for imaging methods that monitor the wall instability that occurs beyond diameter measurements for AAA. Inflammatory markers and collagen are not as stable as fragmented elastin because they fluctuate with disease activity, while the latter is a stable readout of the cumulative amount of structural ECM degradation. Two studies developed anti-elastin antibody-conjugated gold nanoparticles (EL-AuNPs) that selectively bind fragmented elastin and enable quantitative micro-CT imaging due to gold's high X-ray attenuation (Figure 7A, B) 138, 139. Non-reactive immunoglobulin G-conjugated control particles produced no detectable signal even after extensive elastolysis, excluding passive sequestration as the source of the signal.
Figure 7.

EL-AuNP for molecular CT imaging of fragmented elastin in AAA. (A) Targeting mechanism: matrix remodeling fragments aortic elastin, exposing neo-epitopes; EL-AuNP binds the fragmented elastin while sparing intact fibers. (B) EL-AuNP architecture: citrate-capped gold core, SH-PEG-COOH linker, and anti-elastin antibody (termed EL-GNP in 138). (C) Representative CT imaging. Left (Ca), in vivo–targeted micro-CT of explanted aortas after systemic EL-AuNP administration (LDLr⁻ᐟ⁻ + Ang II model): accumulation increases as burst pressure falls (I–III, higher rupture risk; signal–burst-pressure correlation R² = 0.94), with no signal in the age-matched control (IV). Adapted with permission from 138, copyright 2019 Ivyspring International Publisher, CC BY-NC. Right, ex vivo micro-CT (tissue and gold filtered) of elastase-perfused aortas: EL-AuNP accumulation increases with elastase dose (0/0.5/10 U/mL), tracking elastin damage. Adapted with permission from 139, copyright 2020 Biomedical Engineering Society. Figure created with BioRender.com. AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm; Ang II, angiotensin II; Au, gold; AuNP, gold nanoparticle; CT, computed tomography; EL-AuNP, elastin-targeted gold nanoparticle; LDLr⁻ᐟ⁻, low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient; SH-PEG-COOH, thiol-polyethylene glycol-carboxyl linker.
In an angiotensin II-induced AAA model in low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient (LDLr-/-) mice, Wang et al. administered EL-AuNPs (designated EL-GNPs in the original publication) via retro-orbital injection. EL-AuNP accumulation at aneurysmal sites was confirmed within 24 hours by histological co-localization with fragmented elastin 138. Although in vivo CT imaging was not feasible at tested nanoparticle concentrations due to insufficient contrast relative to surrounding tissue, ex vivo micro-CT of explanted aortas clearly visualized the spatial distribution of accumulated EL-AuNPs, with markedly higher signal intensity in aneurysmal compared to healthy aortic segments (Figure 7Ca). The signal intensity demonstrated a strong correlation with ex vivo burst pressure (R2 = 0.9415), whereas neither aortic dilation (R2 = 0.1932) nor circumferential strain (R2 = 0.3918) predicted rupture strength, directly challenging the adequacy of diameter-based risk assessment 138. The maximum-intensity-projection reconstructions revealed that areas of high EL-AuNP signal correlated with the ruptures observed during burst testing (Figure 7Ca), indicating that specific areas of the aneurysmal wall may have a lower strength due to the distribution of nanoparticles.
In a separate study, Lane et al. used a controlled elastase perfusion model in which nanoparticles were incubated ex vivo at three different injury levels (0, 0.5, 10 U/mL). The ex vivo micro-CT was clearly able to show the increase in dose dependent accumulation of EL-AuNPs, with the gold to tissue volume ratios increasing significantly between the different groups (0.37 ± 0.3%, 4.70 ± 2.2%, and 7.56 ± 2.0%, respectively), and hyperspectral microscopy demonstrated that the AuNPs co-localized mainly with fragmented elastin in the medial layer (Figure 7Cb) 139. Importantly, delivery of nanoparticles in this model was via direct tissue incubation instead of systemic injection, and thus was conducted in a less physiologically relevant but more controlled experimental setting.
Collective analysis of these studies suggests that the elastin-targeted gold nanoparticles can be used to image degradation of the ECM in the wall of the aneurysm. These nanoparticles provide molecular imaging that is not possible with traditional imaging, in particular a strong correlation with structural weakness and rupture risk. Imaging in vivo, however, is still a critical step to be met before this technique can be adopted for clinical use, since both studies were performed with explanted aortas.
Discussion
Comparative assessment of targeting strategies
The above strategies focus on three biological aspects of vascular disease: inflammation, lipoprotein trafficking, and ECM structural degradation. Each strategy has been demonstrated to be a proof-of-concept, but there are significant differences in translational maturity and biological specificity.
Macrophage targeting is the most extensively investigated approach, encompassing the broadest range of nanoparticle platforms and the largest number of studies. Importantly, it is the only strategy in this review to have demonstrated a direct link between imaging signal and disease outcome – specifically, the finding by Toczek et al. 133 that early CT enhancement predicted aneurysm progression and survival at four weeks. The transition from passive iodine-based phagocytosis to receptor-mediated active targeting is aimed at increasing biological specificity, with the former being nonselective for macrophage infiltration, whereas the latter system used by Guo et al. 134 discriminates between activated (pro-inflammatory) and quiescent macrophages. This distinction is relevant to the disease process, since M1 and M2 macrophages play opposing roles, as described above. This is a cost in terms of the added formulation complexity, but the ex vivo explantation of cells by Chhour et al. 131 – although conceptually interesting – is not clinically translatable due to the requirement for individual ex vivo cell processing.
In contrast, targeting done via HDL is different. It does not involve passive accumulation or synthetic receptor ligands; instead, it uses an endogenous transport pathway with built-in macrophage affinity. The receptor-mediated uptake mechanism may offer a degree of specificity that passive phagocytosis cannot match, though this has yet to be demonstrated in vivo. In both available studies, CT-based imaging was restricted to excised or frozen tissue, and whether sufficient signal sensitivity can be achieved in vivo on a clinical scanner remains an open question 136, 137.
Elastin targeting differs from the other strategies in one important way: it addresses structural wall failure rather than inflammation. The strong correlation between EL-AuNP signal and ex vivo burst pressure is arguably the most clinically relevant individual finding in this entire review, as it directly challenges the adequacy of diameter-based rupture risk assessment, upon which current clinical guidelines base their recommendation for elective repair at 55 mm 89, 138. The demonstration that molecular imaging of elastin degradation outperforms diameter in predicting wall failure strength raises the prospect of a shift from size-based to biology-guided risk stratification, a clinical implication that, if validated in vivo, would extend well beyond the field of CT imaging. At the same time, elastin targeting is the most translationally immature of the three strategies: neither study achieved in vivo CT imaging, and the methodological gap between ex vivo proof-of-concept and in vivo applicability is the largest of all strategies reviewed here 138, 139.
Table 2 summarizes the nanoparticle platforms, imaging settings, key CT findings, and primary translational barriers for all studies discussed above.
Table 2.
Nanoparticle-based CT contrast agents for molecular imaging of vascular disease: study characteristics and translational barriers.
| Nanoparticle type | Target | Modality | Setting | Key CT result | Translational barrier | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crystalline iodinated NPs (N1177) | Macrophage uptake (passive) | Clinical CT (64-slice) | In vivo (New Zealand white rabbit) | Plaque ΔHU after N1177: 13.3 vs. 4.1 HU conventional agent (P<0.001); plaques exceeding threshold showed macrophage infiltration >20% in 90% of sections | Radiation exposure; signal overlap with calcifications; optimal dosing requires further validation | 130 |
| Liposomal iodinated NPs (iodixanol) | Macrophage uptake (passive) | Micro-CT (dual-energy) | In vivo (ApoE-/- mouse) | Dual-energy spectral decomposition separated liposomal iodine from calcifications; liposomes colocalized with ~ 2% of plaque macrophages | No HU calibration; 40 kVp protocol not available on clinical scanners; potential hypersensitivity from DPPG surface charge | 131 |
| Dendrimer-entrapped gold NPs | Macrophage uptake (passive) | Micro-CT | In vivo (ApoE-/- mouse) | CT values of atherosclerotic vessels significantly elevated up to 6 h post-injection; confirmed by silver staining and CD68 | No quantitative plaque delta-HU; biodistribution evaluated only up to 6 h | 132 |
| Gold NPs, ex vivo monocyte labeling | Monocyte recruitment | Micro-CT | In vivo (ApoE-/- mouse) | Aortic attenuation significantly increased vs. controls (Δ15.3 HU; P = 0.002); TEM confirmed gold NPs in plaque monocytes | Ex vivo cell processing not clinically translatable; increased gold loading per cell required to detect small reductions in monocyte uptake (<30%) | 133 |
| Unmodified gold NPs | Macrophage uptake (passive) | Micro-CT | In vivo (ApoE-/-mouse) | Significant perivascular enhancement in AAA (P = 0.0001); no significant difference in carotid model due to small lesion volume relative to voxel size | Signal insufficient in smaller lesions relative to CT voxel size; detection model-dependent | 134 |
| Barium sulfate NPs (Exitron nano 12000) | Macrophage uptake (passive) | Micro-CT | In vivo (ApoE-/- mouse) | Aortic wall enhancement correlated with CD68 expression (r = 0.85; P < 0.001); early CT signal predicted aneurysm diameter and survival at 4 weeks | Off-target uptake in endothelial and smooth muscle cells; prolonged tissue retention; preclinical use only | 135 |
| Pd@Au nanosheets (PEG/FA-functionalized) | FR-β on pro-inflammatory macrophages | Micro-CT | In vivo (ApoE-/-mouse) | CT enhancement of aortic wall visible at 30 min post-injection; FR-β co-localized with CD68 in high-risk plaques | CT signal not quantified; no delta-HU reported; high background in kidneys | 136 |
| Gold nanocrystal-core HDL-mimetic NPs | HDL receptor-mediated uptake (SR-B1 / ABCA1) | Micro-CT | Ex vivo (ApoE-/- mouse) | High-attenuation foci at aortic arch and renal arteries in Au-HDL aortas; absent in Au-PEG and saline controls | Low CT sensitivity; imaging restricted to excised aortas | 138 |
| Gold nanocrystal-core HDL-mimetic NPs | HDL receptor-mediated uptake (SR-B1 / ABCA1 | Spectral-CT (preclinical) | Ex vivo (ApoE-/- mouse) | Au-HDL accumulation in aorta detected by gold K-edge images; simultaneous material decomposition of gold, iodine, and calcium in single scan | Preclinical single-row prototype; in vivo CT acquisition not feasible | 139 |
| Anti-elastin antibody-conjugated gold NPs | Degraded elastin in AAA wall | Micro-CT | Ex vivo (LDLr-/- mouse) | Higher signal intensity in aneurysmal vs. healthy aortic segments; micro-CT signal correlated with burst pressure (R²=0.9415); maximum intensity projection foci corresponded to rupture sites | In vivo CT signal insufficient at tested concentrations; imaging restricted to explanted aortas | 140 |
| Anti-elastin antibody-conjugated gold NPs | Degraded elastin in AAA wall | Micro-CT | Ex vivo, elastase perfusion model (graded injury) | Dose-dependent micro-CT signal (Gold-to-tissue ratios 0.37%, 4.70%, 7.56% at 0, 0.5, 10 U/mL); signal correlated with lumen area compliance and percent dilation | Ex vivo tissue incubation only; no systemic delivery; dilation below clinical AAA threshold | 141 |
AAA: abdominal aortic aneurysm; ABCA1: ATP-binding cassette transporter A1; ApoE-/-: apolipoprotein E–deficient; Au-HDL: gold nanocrystal high-density lipoprotein; Au-PEG: gold polyethylene glycol; CT: computed tomography; DPPG: 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoglycerol, sodium salt; FR-β: folate receptor β; HU: Hounsfield unit; LDLr-/-: low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient; NPs: nanoparticles; SR-B1: scavenger receptor class B type 1; TEM: transmission electron microscopy.
Although each strategy has a different major obstacle—sensitivity of the macrophages in the case of macrophage-targeted formulations, in vivo validation of HDL-mimetic nanoparticles, and shifting from ex vivo proof-of-concept to systemic in vivo use for elastin-targeted agents—the pattern is the same and reflected in Table 2. What these strategies share is that imaging has been predominantly performed in small animal models using preclinical micro-CT systems, and no targeted CT contrast agent has entered clinical evaluation to date. The limiting factor is therefore not a shortage of viable biological targets, but a defined set of well-characterized, strategy-specific translational barriers.
Translational considerations
The transition from preclinical feasibility studies to clinical implementation represents the central and as yet unresolved challenge in molecular CT imaging of vascular disease. A review of the available studies reveals several consistent barriers.
The primary and most important constraint is that of signal sensitivity. Most of the reviewed studies relied on micro-CT, a technique that offers spatial resolution sufficient to visualize the thin vessel walls of murine models but does not reflect the sensitivity constraints of clinical CT systems. The two modalities differ fundamentally across several parameters relevant to molecular imaging: micro-CT systems employ micro-focus X-ray sources with spatial resolutions of 10–100 µm and flat-panel detectors with pixel sizes below 150 µm, whereas clinical CT systems achieve resolutions in the submillimeter range with curved detector arrays optimized for large-field, low-dose acquisition 140. Radiation doses in preclinical micro-CT are substantially higher than those acceptable in clinical practice, and acquisition times are considerably longer, collectively yielding signal-to-noise ratios that cannot be reproduced under clinical conditions 140, 141. As a consequence, signal thresholds demonstrated in micro-CT studies cannot be directly extrapolated to clinical scanners. The absence of detectable contrast enhancement on a micro-CT system, as reported by Wang et al. with EL-AuNPs at tested concentrations, should therefore be interpreted as evidence of a current sensitivity gap, not as proof of fundamental clinical infeasibility 138. Kosuge et al. illustrated this directly: in the carotid ligation model, the volume of inflammatory tissue was too small relative to the CT voxel size to produce a detectable signal difference - a limitation the authors attributed to the smaller lesion size compared to the aorta, where the same agent generated a significant signal 132.
These findings show an important consideration throughout the review. The feasibility of molecular CT imaging varies across the vascular system and depends on three interacting factors: vessel size, wall thickness, and motion. Vessel size and wall thickness together influence the severity of the partial volume effect, an inherent limitation of voxel-based CT: when the vessel wall is small relative to the CT voxel, its attenuation is averaged with that of the adjacent luminal blood and perivascular tissue, diluting the measurable contrast and raising the local concentration required for detection. The abdominal aorta, with the largest diameter and thickest wall, is the least affected and therefore offers the most favorable ratio of diseased to healthy tissue within a voxel, whereas the thinner walls of the carotid and coronary arteries are far more susceptible to partial volume averaging. Motion imposes a further, territory-specific penalty: the coronary arteries undergo continuous cardiac motion, compounded by respiratory excursion, that necessitates electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated acquisition and high temporal resolution 142. The carotid arteries are superficial and largely free of cardiac motion but small in caliber, whereas the abdominal aorta is comparatively static. Although the coronary territory is a principal site of clinical interest in atherosclerosis, it represents the least favorable combination of all three factors, whereas the abdominal aorta represents the most favorable; the imaging advantage of AAA studies is therefore structural, independent of the agent used.
Against this background, the finding by Hyafil et al. – detection of macrophage-dependent plaque accumulation on a clinical 64-slice scanner – represents the most translationally relevant technical achievement within this review, one that has not been replicated by any subsequently developed agents 128. However, as Hyafil et al. employed a rabbit rather than a mouse model, this result also benefits from the larger vessel wall of the model organism and does not provide direct evidence for feasibility in humans.
Beyond the sensitivity gap between preclinical and clinical systems, detection capability also depends on the CT platform itself. On conventional energy-integrating scanners, iodinated contrast is detectable only at comparatively high concentrations, and the measured attenuation cannot be assigned to a specific element, so a nanoparticle label cannot be distinguished from vascular calcium or luminal blood. Dual-energy and spectral CT address the latter limitation through material decomposition, which separates the contrast material from calcium. Photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) extends this further: by resolving the energy of individual photons, it enables element-specific K-edge imaging and provides higher contrast-to-noise ratios 143 and spatial resolution at matched dose 144. Si-Mohamed et al. demonstrated the in vivo value of this capability, using gold-nanoparticle K-edge imaging to separate the macrophage-associated probe signal from iodine and calcium and to track plaque macrophage burden far more closely than conventional CT (r = 0.82 vs 0.41) 145. The gain, however, is primarily one of specificity rather than raw sensitivity: the minimum detectable concentration on PCD-CT is still on the order of 1 mg I/mL and rises as the target shrinks (0.5 and 1.0 mg I/mL for 8-mm and 4-mm lesions, respectively) 146, so the requirement for relatively high local agent concentrations persists. The recent clinical introduction of PCD-CT and ongoing detector improvements may therefore narrow, but are unlikely to eliminate, the sensitivity bottleneck that currently constrains molecular CT.
A second barrier concerns targeting efficiency. Even when nanoparticle accumulation within the target tissue has been demonstrated, it remains unclear what fraction of the relevant cell population is actually reached. Bhavane et al. showed, using image-based cytometry, that their liposomal nanoparticles colocalized with only ~ 2% of plaque macrophages 129. The fact that a CT signal was still detectable can be explained by the high iodine payload per particle - a finding that simultaneously illustrates how narrow the signal margin is and how little room remains for further reductions in uptake efficiency. Bhavane et al. did not report the effective iodine concentration within the plaque, which precludes a reliable assessment of whether the achieved local accumulation exceeded the detection limits of clinical CT systems. Depending on the scanner platform and object size, these detection limits range from 0.02 to 0.55 mg/mL 129, 147. In passive uptake mechanisms, this efficiency remains strongly influenced by local factors, including macrophage density, perfusion, and tissue permeability, all of which vary considerably across animal models and human disease. The biological specificity of receptor-based targeting, such as with nanoparticles targeted to FR-β developed by Guo et al. 134, is a way to solve the leveraging challenge. Although they demonstrated phantom linearity of 122.72 HU per mg/mL 134 and measured in vivo contrast agent concentrations in the blood, Guo et al. did not report in vivo concentrations within the plaque. It remains unclear whether this will lead to increased uptake efficiency in vivo, since there is no report comparing the in vivo uptake efficiency of the two approaches under the same experimental conditions. The in-tissue measurements of the contrast agents should be reported in the future in a consistent manner, allowing for comparison with known clinical detection limits.
The third barrier has to do with off-target accumulation and safety. Toczek et al. observed in vitro that their nanoparticles were taken up not only by macrophages but also by endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells - a finding which questions the selectivity of passive targeting approaches 133. In addition, the number of signals within the mononuclear phagocyte system decreased slightly over 6 days, suggesting the signals lingered in the tissues 133. For clinical use, detailed biodistribution and clearance information is critical but none of the reviewed studies provide these details.
In addition to these obstacles, there are two additional factors that are not discussed in the studies reviewed which have implications for clinical translation. Dosimetry is the first consideration. Local concentrations of contrast agents are much higher in CT than in MRI or nuclear imaging to produce a detectable signal 148. High systemic exposure is associated with the required tissue concentrations. To date, preclinical blood-pool CT imaging in mice has been performed with gold doses of around 0.5 g Au/kg body weight, corresponding to about 2.5 µmol Au/g. Such dosing elicits crucial questions regarding long-term tissue retention, biodegradability, and the acceptability of these doses for regulatory approval in diagnostic applications 149. The second is related to manufacturing. The more complex formulations containing targeted nanoparticles are problematic in terms of good manufacturing practice (GMP) compliant production, batch-to-batch reproducibility, and stability, aspects which are generally required for regulatory approval but are not reported in any of the reviewed studies 150, 151.
The translational barriers outlined in this review are linked together in a consistent way: so far, none of the studies were able to tackle simultaneously the issues of signal sensitivity, targeting efficiency, off-target accumulation, safety profile, dosimetry, and end up with a feasible manufacture. The current work offers proof-of-concept data of the biological targeting strategies, but they are not optimized systematically like would be needed for clinical testing.
Untranslated molecular targets
In addition to the three strategies reviewed here, a thorough search of the molecular imaging literature shows a number of other promising, biologically relevant targets that have been validated in vivo in the context of MRI, PET or US, but which have no CT-based equivalent.
Gadolinium-based MRI probes such as P947 can detect MMP activity in vivo during experimental AAA 152 and more recently ⁶⁴Cu-RYM2 153 which also exhibited specific binding to human aortic tissue in addition to MMP activity. VCAM-1 is expressed on activated endothelium at early stages of inflammatory cascade, and VCAM-1-directed nanoparticles have been used for MRI based contrast enhancement of atherosclerosis in mice 154 and VCAM-1-directed microbubbles 155. The αvβ3-integrin is overexpressed during plaque-associated neovascularization and has been targeted for radionuclide imaging, but there is no report of an equivalent for imaging by CT 156. The presence of active microcalcification within the fibrous cap is another biologically important process: ¹⁸F-NaF PET identifies sites of active calcification in coronary atherosclerosis, and shows that ¹⁸F-NaF tracer uptake does not simply reflect the total calcium burden 157, indicating that the biological process of calcium and the anatomical substrate are different entities, and that conventional CT can not detect both. This strategy has been tested in patients with coronary and carotid atherosclerosis, proving clinical proof-of-concept of the validity of active microcalcification as an imaging biomarker of plaque vulnerability independent of the calcium burden 158. Fibrin, which is involved in endothelial disruption and thrombosis, is a target for which gold nanoparticles can be used to specifically target acute thrombosis, but has yet to be applied in chronic vascular wall pathology with CT 159. Ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) enhanced MRI has also been used to image macrophage infiltration of patients with carotid atherosclerosis, where measurable inflammation of the plaque and its response to lipid-lowering therapy have been reported 160.
The absence of CT-compatible probes for these targets reflects constraints that go beyond the general translational barriers discussed above. The millimolar concentrations required for CT signal generation are difficult to achieve for targets that are not amenable to bulk cellular accumulation, in contrast to the macrophage phagocytosis mechanism that underpins the strategies reviewed here 148. PET and MRI circumvent this through intrinsically higher detection sensitivity, operating at picomolar and micromolar concentrations respectively 148. Active microcalcification differs in this respect: here the limiting factor is not achievable concentration but biological specificity, as conventional CT measures static calcium density and cannot resolve the active mineralization process that ¹⁸F-NaF PET detects 157.
Further perspectives
Among the untranslated targets discussed above, MMP activity represents a tractable translational opportunity. As a direct readout of the proteolytic state of the vessel wall, it is pathologically relevant in both fibrous cap degradation and AAA wall failure, and it is in vivo imaging feasibility has already been established with both MRI and PET probes, leaving the development of a CT-compatible equivalent as the remaining translational step.
Ultimately, the role of molecular CT is best understood not as a replacement for the more sensitive MRI and nuclear techniques, but as a means of extending biological characterization of the vessel wall to the cross-sectional modality most widely used in routine vascular assessment, a prospect contingent on advances in probe design and on the translational progress outlined above.
Conclusion
The reviewed studies showed that CT can detect biologically relevant processes in atherosclerotic and aneurysmal vessel walls, such as macrophage infiltration, lipoprotein trafficking, and structural ECM degradation, providing proof of the feasibility of using CT as a platform for molecular imaging, not just for its anatomical applications. The potential is translated into the clinic but requires systematic validation in large-animal models (in vivo validation of HDL mimetics, ex vivo-to-in vivo transition of elastin-targeted agents, signal sensitivity for macrophage-targeted agents) to enable meaningful assessment of human feasibility. The underlying biological basis for molecular CT imaging of vascular disease is solid, but translating these concepts into reality is still in the future.
Acknowledgments
AI usage statement
The authors used Claude [Sonnet 4.6 & Opus 4.6] (Anthropic), and ChatGPT [GPT 5.5] (OpenAI) to assist with language editing and making the manuscript text easier to read during the preparation of this work. The two tools have been used as Cloud services since December 2025 until July 2026, when the text was written and revised. They were not utilized in the process of developing research questions, literature searching, data collection, data analysis or figure generation, but instead all the sources were identified, retrieved and verified by the authors. The authors take full responsibility for the content of the published article.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, A.K. and M.R.M.; Funding Acquisition, M.R.M.; Methodology, J.M.; Project Administration, A.K. and M.R.M.; Validation, A.K., M.R.M., F.P., L.C.A., K.K.B., H.L., and F.S.R.; Visualization, J.M.; Writing – Original Draft, J.M.; Writing – Review & Editing, A.K., M.R.M., F.P., L.C.A., K.K.B., H.L., and F.S.R.
All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Abbreviations
- AAA
abdominal aortic aneurysm
- ABCA1
ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter A1
- ApoE-/-
apolipoprotein E-deficient
- Au-HDL
gold nanocrystal high-density lipoprotein
- Au-PEG
gold polyethylene glycol
- CT
computed tomography
- CTA
computed tomography angiography
- CVD
cardiovascular disease(s)
- ECG
electrocardiogram
- ECM
extracellular matrix
- EL-AuNPs
anti-elastin antibody-conjugated gold nanoparticles
- FR-β
folate receptor-β
- GMP
good manufacturing practice
- HDL
high-density lipoprotein
- HU
Hounsfield unit
- ICAM-1
intercellular adhesion molecule-1
- IL-1β
interleukin-1β
- IL-6
interleukin-6
- LDL
low-density lipoprotein
- LDLr-/-
low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient
- MMP
matrix metalloproteinase
- MRI
magnetic resonance imaging
- NP
nanoparticle
- oxLDL
oxidized low-density lipoprotein
- PCD-CT
Photon-counting detector computed tomography
- Pd@Au-PEG-FA
folate-conjugated palladium-gold nanosheets with polyethylene glycol coating
- PEG
polyethylene glycol
- PET
positron emission tomography
- SPECT
single-photon emission computed tomography
- SR-B1
Scavenger Receptor Class B Type 1
- TEM
transmission electron microscopy
- TIMP
tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase
- TNF-α
tumor necrosis factor-α
- US
ultrasound
- USPIO
ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide
- VCAM-1
vascular cell adhesion molecule-1
- VSMC
vascular smooth muscle cell
References
- 1.Martin SS, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Anderson CAM, Arora P, Avery CL. et al. 2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2024;149:E347–913. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.WHO. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) Factsheet. 31 July 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds)
- 3.Nedkoff L, Briffa T, Zemedikun D, Herrington S, Wright FL. Global Trends in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. Clin Ther. 2023;45:1087–91. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yerly A, van der Vorst EPC, Schindewolf M, Kotelis D, Noels H, Döring Y. Chemokine-receptor-guided B-cell immunity in cardiovascular disease. Basic Res Cardiol. 2025;120:1075–90. doi: 10.1007/s00395-025-01140-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhu J, Meganathan I, MacAruthur R, Kassiri Z. Inflammation in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Cause or Comorbidity? Can J Cardiol. 2024;40:2378–91. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2024.08.274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ibanez B, Fernández-Ortiz A, Fernández-Friera L, García-Lunar I, Andrés V, Fuster V. Progression of Early Subclinical Atherosclerosis (PESA) Study: JACC Focus Seminar 7/8. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:156–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Insull W. The Pathology of Atherosclerosis: Plaque Development and Plaque Responses to Medical Treatment. Am J Med. 2009;122:S3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jakubowski H, Witucki Ł. Homocysteine Metabolites, Endothelial Dysfunction, and Cardiovascular Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26:746. doi: 10.3390/ijms26020746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.WHO. The top 10 causes of death. 7 August 2024. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death .
- 10.Ambrose JA, Tannenbaum MA, Alexopoulos D, Hjemdahl-Monsen CE, Leavy J, Weiss M. et al. Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:56–62. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90356-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J. et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: A call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation. 2003;108:1664–72. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087480.94275.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Siika A, Talvitie M, Lindquist Liljeqvist M, Bogdanovic M, Gasser TC, Hultgren R. et al. Peak wall rupture index is associated with risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms, independent of size and sex. Br J Surg. 2024;111:znae125. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Groeneveld ME, Meekel JP, Rubinstein SM, Merkestein LR, Tangelder GJ, Wisselink W. et al. Systematic review of circulating, biomechanical, and genetic markers for the prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth and rupture. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e007791. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Forsythe RO, Newby DE, Robson JMJ. Monitoring the biological activity of abdominal aortic aneurysms Beyond Ultrasound. Heart. 2016;102:817–24. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Verjans JW, Jaffer FA. BIOLOGICAL IMAGING OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS: MOVING BEYOND ANATOMY. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2013;6:681–94. doi: 10.1007/s12265-013-9474-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Damluji AA, Nanna MG, Mason P, Lowenstern A, Orkaby AR, Washam JB. et al. Coronary Artery Revascularization in the Older Adult Population: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2025;152:494–525. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Margolis EA, Friend NE, Rolle MW, Alsberg E, Putnam AJ. Manufacturing the multiscale vascular hierarchy: progress toward solving the grand challenge of tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2023;41:1400–16. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2023.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cocciolone AJ, Hawes JZ, Staiculescu MC, Johnson EO, Murshed M, Wagenseil JE. Elastin, arterial mechanics, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2018;315:H189–205. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00087.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lyle AN, Raaz U. Killing me unsoftly: Causes and mechanisms of arterial stiffness. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;37:e1–11. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.308563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Barry M, Touati G, Chardon K, Laude M, Libert JP, Sevestre H. Histologic study of coronary, radial, ulnar, epigastric and internal thoracic arteries: Application to coronary artery bypass grafts. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007;29:297–302. doi: 10.1007/s00276-007-0214-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jadidi M, Razian SA, Habibnezhad M, Anttila E, Kamenskiy A. Mechanical, structural, and physiologic differences in human elastic and muscular arteries of different ages: Comparison of the descending thoracic aorta to the superficial femoral artery. Acta Biomater. 2021;119:268–83. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.10.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dosunmu-Ogunbi AAM, Galley JC, Yuan S, Schmidt HM, Wood KC, Straub AC. Redox Switches Controlling Nitric Oxide Signaling in the Resistance Vasculature and Implications for Blood Pressure Regulation: Mid-Career Award for Research Excellence 2020. Hypertension. 2021;78:912–26. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.16493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Katona M, Gladwin MT, Straub AC. Flipping Off and On the Redox Switch in the Microcirculation. Annu Rev Physiol. 2023;85:165–89. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-031522-021457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Marchand M, Monnot C, Muller L, Germain S. Extracellular matrix scaffolding in angiogenesis and capillary homeostasis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2019;89:147–56. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gao Y. Architecture of the Blood Vessels. Biology of Vascular Smooth Muscle: Vasoconstriction and Dilatation. Singapore: Springer Singapore. 2022. p. 3-12.
- 26.Laboyrie SL, de Vries MR, Bijkerk R, Rotmans JI. Building a Scaffold for Arteriovenous Fistula Maturation: Unravelling the Role of the Extracellular Matrix. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:10825. doi: 10.3390/ijms241310825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Barallobre-Barreiro J, Loeys B, Mayr M, Rienks M, Verstraeten A, Kovacic JC. Extracellular Matrix in Vascular Disease, Part 2/4: JACC Focus Seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:2189–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Eble JA, Niland S. The Extracellular Matrix of Blood Vessels. Curr Pharm Des. 2009;15:1385–400. doi: 10.2174/138161209787846757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jamwal S, Sharma S. Vascular endothelium dysfunction: a conservative target in metabolic disorders. Inflamm Res. 2018;67:391–405. doi: 10.1007/s00011-018-1129-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gallo G, Savoia C. New Insights into Endothelial Dysfunction in Cardiometabolic Diseases: Potential Mechanisms and Clinical Implications. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:2973. doi: 10.3390/ijms25052973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yap C, Mieremet A, De Vries CJM, Micha D, De Waard V. Six Shades of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Illuminated by KLF4 (Krüppel-Like Factor 4) Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2021;41:2693–707. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.121.316600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yorn C, Kim H, Jeong K. Influence of DNA Methylation on Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotypic Switching. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:3136. doi: 10.3390/ijms25063136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Majesky MW, Dong XR, Hoglund V, Mahoney WM, Daum G. The adventitia: A dynamic interface containing resident progenitor cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:1530–9. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.221549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tinajero MG, Gotlieb AI. Recent Developments in Vascular Adventitial Pathobiology: The Dynamic Adventitia as a Complex Regulator of Vascular Disease. Am J Pathol. 2020;190:520–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Osidak MS, Osidak EO, Akhmanova MA, Domogatsky SP, Domogatskaya AS. Fibrillar, fibril-associated and basement membrane collagens of the arterial wall: architecture, elasticity and remodeling under stress. Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21:1124–33. doi: 10.2174/1381612820666141013122906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Butlin M, Tan I, Spronck B, Avolio AP. Measuring Arterial Stiffness in Animal Experimental Studies. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40:1068–77. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jana S, Hu M, Shen M, Kassiri Z. Extracellular matrix, regional heterogeneity of the aorta, and aortic aneurysm. Exp Mol Med. 2019;51:1–15. doi: 10.1038/s12276-019-0286-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Karamanos NK, Theocharis AD, Piperigkou Z, Manou D, Passi A, Skandalis SS. et al. A guide to the composition and functions of the extracellular matrix. FEBS J. 2021;288:6850–912. doi: 10.1111/febs.15776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fu Y, Zhou Y, Wang K, Li Z, Kong W. Extracellular Matrix Interactome in Modulating Vascular Homeostasis and Remodeling. Circ Res. 2024;134:931–49. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.324055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Weijers EM, Van Wijhe MH, Joosten L, Horrevoets AJG, De Maat MPM, Van Hinsbergh VWM. et al. Molecular weight fibrinogen variants alter gene expression and functional characteristics of human endothelial cells. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:2800–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04096.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Weisel JW, Litvinov RI. Fibrin as a Versatile Fibrous Biopolymer. Subcell Biochem. 2026;113:413–73. doi: 10.1007/978-3-032-05273-5_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Luyendyk JP, Flick MJ, Wolberg AS. Factor XIII: driving (cross-)links in hemostasis, thrombosis, and disease. Blood. 2025;146:1412–21. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024025321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Viola M, Karousou E, Luisa D, Angelo M, Moretto P, Caon I. et al. Extracellular Matrix in Atherosclerosis: Hyaluronan and Proteoglycans Insights. Curr Med Chem. 2016;23:2958–71. doi: 10.2174/0929867323666160607104602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kumarapperuma H, Chia ZJ, Malapitan SM, Wight TN, Little PJ, Kamato D. Response to retention hypothesis as a source of targets for arterial wall-directed therapies to prevent atherosclerosis: A critical review. Atherosclerosis. 2024;397:118552. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2024.118552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bennasroune A, Romier-Crouzet B, Blaise S, Laffargue M, Efremov RG, Martiny L. et al. Elastic fibers and elastin receptor complex: Neuraminidase-1 takes the center stage. Matrix Biol. 2019;84:57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2019.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chen CG, Iozzo RV. Angiostatic cues from the matrix: Endothelial cell autophagy meets hyaluronan biology. J Biol Chem. 2020;295:16797–812. doi: 10.1074/jbc.REV120.014391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Atkinson G, Bianco R, Di Gregoli K, Johnson JL. The contribution of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors to the development, progression, and rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1248561. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1248561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wolosowicz M, Prokopiuk S, Kaminski TW. The Complex Role of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) in Health and Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:13691. doi: 10.3390/ijms252413691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dai C, Khalil RA. Calcium Signaling Dynamics in Vascular Cells and Their Dysregulation in Vascular Disease. Biomolecules. 2025;15:892. doi: 10.3390/biom15060892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wang JC, Bennett M. Aging and atherosclerosis: Mechanisms, functional consequences, and potential therapeutics for cellular senescence. Circ Res. 2012;111:245–59. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.261388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.He Z, Luo J, Lv M, Li Q, Ke W, Niu X. et al. Characteristics and evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques: an overview of state-of-the-art techniques. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1159288. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1159288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Netala VR, Teertam SK, Li H, Zhang Z. A Comprehensive Review of Cardiovascular Disease Management: Cardiac Biomarkers, Imaging Modalities, Pharmacotherapy, Surgical Interventions, and Herbal Remedies. Cells. 2024;13:1471. doi: 10.3390/cells13171471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Schachter M. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Int J Cardiol. 1997;62:S3–7. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(97)00235-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Jebari-Benslaiman S, Galicia-García U, Larrea-Sebal A, Olaetxea JR, Alloza I, Vandenbroeck K. et al. Pathophysiology of Atherosclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:3346. doi: 10.3390/ijms23063346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Libby P, Buring JE, Badimon L, Hansson GK, Deanfield J, Bittencourt MS. et al. Atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5:56. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0106-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Falk E. Pathogenesis of Atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:C7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Poznyak AV, Sukhorukov VN, Guo S, Postnov AY, Orekhov AN. Sex Differences Define the Vulnerability to Atherosclerosis. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2023;17:11795468231189044. doi: 10.1177/11795468231189044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Luca AC, David SG, David AG, Țarcă V, Pădureț IA, Mîndru DE. et al. Atherosclerosis from Newborn to Adult-Epidemiology, Pathological Aspects, and Risk Factors. Life (Basel) 2023;13:2056. doi: 10.3390/life13102056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Baek KI, Ryu K. Role of Flow-Sensitive Endothelial Genes in Atherosclerosis and Antiatherogenic Therapeutics Development. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2024;17:609–23. doi: 10.1007/s12265-023-10463-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Alradwan I, Al Fayez N, Alomary MN, Alshehri AA, Aodah AH, Almughem FA. et al. Emerging Trends and Innovations in the Treatment and Diagnosis of Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Disease: A Comprehensive Review towards Healthier Aging. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16:1037. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16081037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zhang S, Liu Y, Cao Y, Zhang S, Sun J, Wang Y. et al. Targeting the Microenvironment of Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaques: An Emerging Diagnosis and Therapy Strategy for Atherosclerosis. Adv Mater. 2022;34:e2110660. doi: 10.1002/adma.202110660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Linton MF, Yancey PG, Davies SS, Jerome WG, Linton EF, Song WL, The Role of Lipids and Lipoproteins in Atherosclerosis. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc. 2019. p. 166-86.
- 63.Borén J, Packard CJ, Binder CJ. Apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins in atherogenesis. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025;22:399–413. doi: 10.1038/s41569-024-01111-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gencer S, Evans BR, Van Der Vorst EPC, Döring Y, Weber C. Inflammatory Chemokines in Atherosclerosis. Cells. 2021;10:226. doi: 10.3390/cells10020226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Xing Y, Lin X. Challenges and advances in the management of inflammation in atherosclerosis. J Adv Res. 2025;71:317–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2024.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Yurdagul A, Doran AC, Cai B, Fredman G, Tabas IA. Mechanisms and Consequences of Defective Efferocytosis in Atherosclerosis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018;4:86. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2017.00086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Wu J, He S, Song Z, Chen S, Lin X, Sun H. et al. Macrophage polarization states in atherosclerosis. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1185587. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1185587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Henein MY, Vancheri S, Longo G, Vancheri F. The Role of Inflammation in Cardiovascular Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:12906. doi: 10.3390/ijms232112906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Gerosa C, Cerrone G, Suri JS, Aimola V, Cau F, Coni P. et al. The human carotid atherosclerotic plaque: an observational review of histological scoring systems. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27:3784–92. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202304_32179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Lin J, Kakkar V, Lu X. Impact of Matrix Metalloproteinases on Atherosclerosis. Curr Drug Targets. 2014;15:442–53. doi: 10.2174/1389450115666140211115805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Rouis M. Matrix Metalloproteinases: A Potential Therapeutic Target in Atherosclerosis. Curr Drug Targets Cardiovasc Haematol Disord. 2005;5:541–8. doi: 10.2174/156800605774961979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Papaioannou TG, Kalantzis C, Katsianos E, Sanoudou D, Vavuranakis M, Tousoulis D. Personalized Assessment of the Coronary Atherosclerotic Arteries by Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging: Hunting the Vulnerable Plaque. J Pers Med. 2019;9:8. doi: 10.3390/jpm9010008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Durham AL, Speer MY, Scatena M, Giachelli CM, Shanahan CM. Role of smooth muscle cells in vascular calcification: implications in atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness. Cardiovasc Res. 2018;114:590–600. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvy010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Elmarasi M, Elmakaty I, Elsayed B, Elsayed A, Zein JA, Boudaka A. et al. Phenotypic switching of vascular smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis, hypertension, and aortic dissection. J Cell Physiol. 2024;239:e31200. doi: 10.1002/jcp.31200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Creager MD, Hohl T, Hutcheson JD, Moss AJ, Schlotter F, Blaser MC. et al. 18F-fluoride Signal Amplification Identifies Microcalcifications Associated with Atherosclerotic Plaque Instability in PET/CT Images. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:e007835. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.007835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Gherasie FA, Popescu MR, Bartos D. Acute Coronary Syndrome: Disparities of Pathophysiology and Mortality with and without Peripheral Artery Disease. J Pers Med. 2023;13:944. doi: 10.3390/jpm13060944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Coenen DM, Heinzmann ACA, Karel MFA, Cosemans JMEM, Koenen RR. The multifaceted contribution of platelets in the emergence and aftermath of acute cardiovascular events. Atherosclerosis. 2021;319:132–41. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Qian G, Adeyanju O, Olajuyin A, Guo X. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Formation with a Focus on Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. Life (Basel) 2022;12:191. doi: 10.3390/life12020191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Wanhainen A, Björck M, Boman K, Rutegård J, Bergqvist D. Influence of diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:229–35. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.115801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Desforges JF, Ernst CB. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1167–72. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304223281607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Shaw PM, Loree J, Oropallo A. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2025. [PubMed]
- 82.Leone N, Broda MA, Eiberg JP, Resch TA. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Incidence of Rupture, Repair, and Death of Small and Large Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms under Surveillance. J Clin Med. 2023;12:6837. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Johnston KW, Rutherford RB, Tilson MD, Shah DM, Hollier L, Stanley JC. Suggested standards for reporting on arterial aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1991;13:452–8. doi: 10.1067/mva.1991.26737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.McGregor JC, Pollock JG, Anton HC. The Value of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Scott Med J. 1975;20:133–7. doi: 10.1177/003693307502000313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Summerhill VI, Sukhorukov VN, Eid AH, Nedosugova LV, Sobenin IA, Orekhov AN. Pathophysiological Aspects of the Development of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with a Special Focus on Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Genetic Associations. Biomol Concepts. 2021;12:55–67. doi: 10.1515/bmc-2021-0007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Wanhainen A, Mani K, Golledge J. Surrogate Markers of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Progression. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016;36:236–44. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.306538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Participants TUKSATPJ, Brady AR, Brown LC, Fowkes FG, Greenhalgh RM, Ruckley CV, Thompson SG. Long-Term Outcomes of Immediate Repair Compared with Surveillance of Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1445–52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, Jackson BM, Lee WA, Mansour MA. et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:2–77.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Wanhainen A, Van Herzeele I, Bastos Goncalves F, Bellmunt Montoya S, Berard X, Boyle JR. et al. Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024;67:192–331. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Hosseini A, Penson PE, Cicero AFG, Golledge J, Al-Rasadi K, Jamialahmadi T. et al. Potential Benefits of Phytochemicals for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Curr Med Chem. 2021;28:8595–607. doi: 10.2174/0929867328666210614113116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Yuan Z, Lu Y, Wei J, Wu J, Yang J, Cai Z. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Roles of Inflammatory Cells. Front Immunol. 2021;11:609161. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.609161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kucher AN, Koroleva IA, Nazarenko MS. Exploring Disparities in Atherosclerosis Comorbidity with Aortic Aneurysm. Biomedicines. 2025;13:593. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13030593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Van Hemelrijck M, Risteski P, Rings L, Milojevic M, Rodríguez Cetina Biefer H, Dzemali O. Embryological Divergence and Molecular Mechanisms in Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Bridging Developmental Biology and Clinical Insights. Biomolecules. 2025;15:1654. doi: 10.3390/biom15121654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Thayaparan D, Emoto T, Khan AB, Besla R, Hamidzada H, El-Maklizi M. et al. Endothelial dysfunction drives atherosclerotic plaque macrophage-dependent abdominal aortic aneurysm formation. Nat Immunol. 2025;26:706–21. doi: 10.1038/s41590-025-02132-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Toghill BJ, Saratzis A, Bown MJ. Abdominal aortic aneurysm-an independent disease to atherosclerosis? Cardiovasc Pathol. 2017;27:71–5. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2017.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Kessler V, Klopf J, Eilenberg W, Neumayer C, Brostjan C, Kessler V. et al. AAA Revisited: A Comprehensive Review of Risk Factors, Management, and Hallmarks of Pathogenesis. Biomedicines. 2022;10:94. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10010094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Marsman J, Gimenez G, Day RC, Horsfield JA, Jones GT. A non-coding genetic variant associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm alters ERG gene regulation. Hum Mol Genet. 2020;29:554–65. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddz256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.van Merrienboer TAR, Rombouts KB, Bogunovic N, Mieremet A, Meekel JP, Balm R. et al. Metformin Improves the Function of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Patient-Derived Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2025;69:485–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Ribeiro-Silva M, Oliveira-Pinto J, Mansilha A. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: A review on the role of oral antidiabetic drugs. Int Angiol. 2020;39:330–40. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.20.04362-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Hellenthal FAMVI, Buurman WA, Wodzig WKWH, Schurink WH, Hellenthal FAMVI, Buurman WA. et al. Biomarkers of abdominal aortic aneurysm progression. Part 2: inflammation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2009;6:543–52. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2009.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Thompson RW, Liao S, Curci JA. Vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Coron Artery Dis. 1997;8:623–31. doi: 10.1097/00019501-199710000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Li Y, Wang W, Li L, Khalil RA. MMPs and ADAMs/ADAMTS inhibition therapy of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Life Sci. 2020;253:117659. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Sakalihasan N, Michel JB, Katsargyris A, Kuivaniemi H, Defraigne JO, Nchimi A. et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:34. doi: 10.1038/s41572-018-0030-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Norman PE, Curci JA. Understanding the effects of tobacco smoke on the pathogenesis of aortic aneurysm. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33:1473–7. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.300158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Cameron SJ, Russell HM, Phillip Owens A. Antithrombotic therapy in abdominal aortic aneurysm: beneficial or detrimental? Blood. 2018;132:2619–28. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-08-743237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Gacchina CE, Deb P, Barth JL, Ramamurthi A. Elastogenic Inductability of Smooth Muscle Cells from a Rat Model of Late Stage Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17:1699–711. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Dale MA, Ruhlman MK, Baxter BT. Inflammatory cell phenotypes in AAAs: their role and potential as targets for therapy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35:1746–55. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.305269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Batra R, Suh MK, Carson JS, Dale MA, Meisinger TM, Fitzgerald M. et al. IL-1β and TNF-α Impact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Formation by Differential Effects on Macrophage Polarization. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;38:457–463. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.310333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Hou N, Zhou H, Li J, Xiong X, Deng H, Xiong S. Macrophage polarization and metabolic reprogramming in abdominal aortic aneurysm. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024;12:e1268. doi: 10.1002/iid3.1268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Miller FJ, Sharp WJ, Fang X, Oberley LW, Oberley TD, Weintraub NL. Oxidative stress in human abdominal aortic aneurysms: a potential mediator of aneurysmal remodeling. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22:560–5. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.0000013778.72404.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Raffort J, Lareyre F, Clément M, Hassen-Khodja R, Chinetti G, Mallat Z. Monocytes and macrophages in abdominal aortic aneurysm. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017;14:457–71. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Brangsch J, Reimann C, Collettini F, Buchert R, Botnar RM, Makowski MR. Molecular Imaging of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Trends Mol Med. 2017;23:150–64. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2016.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Raffetto JD, Khalil RA. Matrix Metalloproteinases and their Inhibitors in Vascular Remodeling and Vascular Disease. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007;75:346–59. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Kaufmann J-O. Entwicklung und Evaluierung von spezifischen, peptidbasierten Sonden für die molekulare MRT- Bildgebung von Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen. Berlin. 2023.
- 115.Cho MJ, Lee MR, Park JG. Aortic aneurysms: current pathogenesis and therapeutic targets. Exp Mol Med. 2023;55:2519–30. doi: 10.1038/s12276-023-01130-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Ristow I, Riedel C, Lenz A, Well L, Adam G, Panuccio G. et al. Current Imaging Strategies in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Rofo. 2024;196:52–61. doi: 10.1055/a-2119-6448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Lau C, Feldman DN, Girardi L, Kim L. Imaging for surveillance and operative management for endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9:S309–16. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Maes L, Versweyveld L, Evans NR, McCabe JJ, Kelly P, Van Laere K. et al. Novel Targets for Molecular Imaging of Inflammatory Processes of Carotid Atherosclerosis: A Systematic Review. Semin Nucl Med. 2024;54:658–73. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Ibanez B, Badimon JJ, Garcia MJ. Diagnosis of atherosclerosis by imaging. Am J Med. 2009;122:S15–25. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, Alexandrov AV, Baker JD, Bluth EI. et al. Carotid Artery Stenosis: Gray-Scale and Doppler US Diagnosis - Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference. Radiology. 2003;229:340–6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2292030516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Falesch LA, Foley WD. Computed Tomograpy Angiography of the Renal Circulation. Radiol Clin North Am. 2016;54:71–86. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2015.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Meschia JF, Klaas JP, Brown RD, Brott TG. Evaluation and Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid Stenosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92:1144–57. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.02.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Nerlekar N, Ha FJ, Cheshire C, Rashid H, Cameron JD, Wong DT. et al. Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography-Derived Plaque Characteristics Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:e006973. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Cai JM, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Small R, Polissar NL, Yuan C. Classification of human carotid atherosclerotic lesions with in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2002;106:1368–73. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000028591.44554.f9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Syed MBJ, Fletcher AJ, Forsythe RO, Kaczynski J, Newby DE, Dweck MR. et al. Emerging techniques in atherosclerosis imaging. Br J Radiol. 2019;92:20180309. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Rosenbaum D, Millon A, Fayad ZA. Molecular imaging in atherosclerosis: FDG PET. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2012;14:429–37. doi: 10.1007/s11883-012-0264-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Tingen HSA, Van Praagh GD, Nienhuis PH, Tubben A, Van Rijsewijk ND, Hove DT. et al. The clinical value of quantitative cardiovascular molecular imaging: a step towards precision medicine. Br J Radiol. 2023;96:20230704. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20230704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Hyafil F, Cornily JC, Feig JE, Gordon R, Vucic E, Amirbekian V. et al. Noninvasive detection of macrophages using a nanoparticulate contrast agent for computed tomography. Nat Med. 2007;13:636–41. doi: 10.1038/nm1571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Bhavane R, Badea C, Ghaghada KB, Clark D, Vela D, Moturu A. et al. Dual-energy computed tomography imaging of atherosclerotic plaques in a mouse model using a liposomal-iodine nanoparticle contrast agent. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:285–94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.000119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Qin J, Peng C, Zhao B, Ye K, Yuan F, Peng Z. et al. Noninvasive detection of macrophages in atherosclerotic lesions by computed tomography enhanced with PEGylated gold nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:5575–90. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S72819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Chhour P, Naha PC, O'Neill SM, Litt HI, Reilly MP, Ferrari VA. et al. Labeling monocytes with gold nanoparticles to track their recruitment in atherosclerosis with computed tomography. Biomaterials. 2016;87:93–103. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Kosuge H, Nakamura M, Oyane A, Tajiri K, Murakoshi N, Sakai S. et al. Potential of Gold Nanoparticles for Noninvasive Imaging and Therapy for Vascular Inflammation. Mol Imaging Biol. 2022;24:692–9. doi: 10.1007/s11307-021-01654-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Toczek J, Boodagh P, Sanzida N, Ghim M, Salarian M, Gona K. et al. Computed tomography imaging of macrophage phagocytic activity in abdominal aortic aneurysm. Theranostics. 2021;11:5876–88. doi: 10.7150/thno.55106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Guo Z, Yang L, Chen M, Wen X, Liu H, Li J. et al. Molecular imaging of advanced atherosclerotic plaques with folate receptor-targeted 2D nanoprobes. Nano Res. 2020;13:173–82. [Google Scholar]
- 135.Linton MF, Yancey PG, Tao H, Davies SS. HDL Function and Atherosclerosis: Reactive Dicarbonyls as Promising Targets of Therapy. Circ Res. 2023;132:1521–45. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.321563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Cormode DP, Skajaa T, van Schooneveld MM, Koole R, Jarzyna P, Lobatto ME. et al. Nanocrystal Core High-Density Lipoproteins: A Multimodality Contrast Agent Platform. Nano Lett. 2008;8:3715–23. doi: 10.1021/nl801958b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Cormode DP, Roessl E, Thran A, Skajaa T, Gordon RE, Schlomka JP. et al. Atherosclerotic Plaque Composition: Analysis with Multicolor CT and Targeted Gold Nanoparticles. Radiology. 2010;256:774–82. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10092473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Wang X, Lane BA, Eberth JF, Lessner SM, Vyavahare NR. Gold nanoparticles that target degraded elastin improve imaging and rupture prediction in an AngII mediated mouse model of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Theranostics. 2019;9:4156–67. doi: 10.7150/thno.34441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Lane BA, Wang X, Lessner SM, Vyavahare NR, Eberth JF. Targeted Gold Nanoparticles as an Indicator of Mechanical Damage in an Elastase Model of Aortic Aneurysm. Ann Biomed Eng. 2020;48:2268–78. doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02500-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Clark DP, Badea CT. Advances in micro-CT imaging of small animals. Phys Med. 2021;88:175–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Meganck JA, Liu B. Dosimetry in Micro-computed Tomography: a Review of the Measurement Methods, Impacts, and Characterization of the Quantum GX Imaging System. Mol Imaging Biol. 2017;19:499–511. doi: 10.1007/s11307-016-1026-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Machida H, Tanaka I, Fukui R, Shen Y, Ishikawa T, Tate E. et al. Current and Novel Imaging Techniques in Coronary CT. Radiographics. 2015;35:991–1010. doi: 10.1148/rg.2015140181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Lee CL, Park J, Nam S, Choi J, Choi Y, Lee S. et al. Metal artifact reduction and tumor detection using photon-counting multi-energy computed tomography. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0247355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Zhan X, Zhang R, Niu X, Hein I, Budden B, Wu S. et al. Comprehensive evaluations of a prototype full field-of-view photon counting CT system through phantom studies. Phys Med Biol. 2023;68:175007. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/acebb3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Si-Mohamed SA, Sigovan M, Hsu JC, Tatard-Leitman V, Chalabreysse L, Naha PC. et al. In Vivo Molecular K-Edge Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque Using Photon-counting CT. Radiology. 2021;300:98–107. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Zhou W, Michalak G, Weaver J, Ferrero A, Gong H, Fetterly KA. et al. Determination of iodine detectability in different types of multiple-energy images for a photon-counting detector computed tomography system. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2019;6:043501. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.6.4.043501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Jacobsen MC, Cressman ENK, Tamm EP, Baluya DL, Duan X, Cody DD. et al. Dual-energy CT: Lower limits of iodine detection and quantification. Radiology. 2019;292:414–9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.James ML, Gambhir SS. A molecular imaging primer: modalities, imaging agents, and applications. Physiol Rev. 2012;92:897–965. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00049.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Cai QY, Kim SH, Choi KS, Kim SY, Byun SJ, Kim KW. et al. Colloidal gold nanoparticles as a blood-pool contrast agent for X-ray computed tomography in mice. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:797–806. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31811ecdcd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Jin R, Fu X, Pu Y, Fu S, Liang H, Yang L. et al. Clinical translational barriers against nanoparticle-based imaging agents. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;191:114587. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Dordevic S, Gonzalez MM, Conejos-Sanchez I, Carreira B, Pozzi S, Acurcio RC. et al. Current hurdles to the translation of nanomedicines from bench to the clinic. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2022;12:500–25. doi: 10.1007/s13346-021-01024-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Bazeli R, Coutard M, Duport BD, Lancelot E, Corot C, Laissy JP. et al. In vivo evaluation of a new magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent (P947) to target matrix metalloproteinases in expanding experimental abdominal aortic aneurysms. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:662–8. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181ee5bbf. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Toczek J, Gona K, Liu Y, Ahmad A, Ghim M, Ojha D. et al. Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Vessel Wall Matrix Metalloproteinase Activity in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;16:e014615. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.122.014615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Bruckman MA, Jiang K, Simpson EJ, Randolph LN, Luyt LG, Yu X. et al. Dual-modal magnetic resonance and fluorescence imaging of atherosclerotic plaques in vivo using VCAM-1 targeted tobacco mosaic virus. Nano Lett. 2014;14:1551–8. doi: 10.1021/nl404816m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Punjabi M, Xu L, Ochoa-Espinosa A, Kosareva A, Wolff T, Murtaja A. et al. Ultrasound Molecular Imaging of Atherosclerosis with Nanobodies: Translatable Microbubble Targeting Murine and Human VCAM (Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule) 1. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019;39:2520–30. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Laitinen I, Saraste A, Weidl E, Poethko T, Weber AW, Nekolla SG. et al. Evaluation of αvβ3 integrin-targeted positron emission tomography tracer 18F-galacto-RGD for imaging of vascular inflammation in atherosclerotic mice. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:331–8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.846865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Dweck MR, Chow MWL, Joshi NV, Williams MC, Jones C, Fletcher AM. et al. Coronary arterial 18F-sodium fluoride uptake: A novel marker of plaque biology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1539–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Joshi NV, Vesey AT, Williams MC, Shah ASV, Calvert PA, Craighead FHM. et al. 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography for identification of ruptured and high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques: A prospective clinical trial. Lancet. 2014;383:705–13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61754-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Kim JY, Ryu JH, Schellingerhout D, Sun IC, Lee SK, Jeon S. et al. Direct Imaging of Cerebral Thromboemboli Using Computed Tomography and Fibrin-targeted Gold Nanoparticles. Theranostics. 2015;5:1098–114. doi: 10.7150/thno.11679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Tang TY, Howarth SPS, Miller SR, Graves MJ, Patterson AJ, U-King-Im JM. et al. The ATHEROMA (Atorvastatin Therapy: Effects on Reduction of Macrophage Activity) Study. Evaluation Using Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Carotid Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:2039–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
