Abstract
1. The effects of oral administration of 250 mg caffeine or theophylline and placebo on subjective ratings and psychological test performance were studied in a double-blind crossover experiment in 20 healthy elderly subjects. 2. Performance on the continuous attention task showed a significant improvement compared with placebo with both active treatments. Performance with caffeine was significantly better than with theophylline. Mean error index scores (normalised AUCs) were: placebo--0.130; caffeine--0.083; theophylline--0.093. No other objective measure shows significant treatment effects. 3. Subjective ratings showed that subjects felt significantly more alert on caffeine than on either theophylline or placebo. Subjects also rated themselves as more energetic and interested on caffeine than on placebo. 4. Plasma concentrations of caffeine were lower than those of theophylline (mean 5.76 and 8.72 mg l-1 respectively at 2 h post-drug. 5. These results suggest that caffeine is a more potent CNS stimulant than theophylline.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7967a/7967a064ea7b799c77a1fa644ea3bde4cb3453b6" alt="341"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40baf/40bafa4724eb66dba138384c477e6e07c5881c4e" alt="342"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a742/2a74210800fb0ff3f6ba71979edc45285e4f31eb" alt="343"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87863/878638edfc6e658c1713c3b6f2571506ab655709" alt="344"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2beb1/2beb118b74ec7449023dd5679af94d38d2a72bbe" alt="345"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Becker A. B., Simons K. J., Gillespie C. A., Simons F. E. The bronchodilator effects and pharmacokinetics of caffeine in asthma. N Engl J Med. 1984 Mar 22;310(12):743–746. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198403223101202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blanchard J., Sawers S. J. Comparative pharmacokinetics of caffeine in young and elderly men. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1983 Apr;11(2):109–126. doi: 10.1007/BF01061844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruce M., Scott N., Lader M., Marks V. The psychopharmacological and electrophysiological effects of single doses of caffeine in healthy human subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1986 Jul;22(1):81–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1986.tb02883.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henauer S. A., Hollister L. E., Gillespie H. K., Moore F. Theophylline antagonizes diazepam-induced psychomotor impairment. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1983;25(6):743–747. doi: 10.1007/BF00542513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hindmarch I. A 1,4-benzodiazepine, temazepam (K 3917), its effect on some psychological parameters of sleep and behaviour. Arzneimittelforschung. 1975 Nov;25(11):1836–1839. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ISAACS B., WALKEY F. A. A SIMPLIFIED PAIRED-ASSOCIATE TEST FOR ELDERLY HOSPITAL PATIENTS. Br J Psychiatry. 1964 Jan;110:80–83. doi: 10.1192/bjp.110.464.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matthews J. N., Altman D. G., Campbell M. J., Royston P. Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. BMJ. 1990 Jan 27;300(6719):230–235. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6719.230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pigache R. M. Comparison of scoring methods for tests of attention, including an error index for use with schizophrenic patients. Percept Mot Skills. 1976 Feb;42(1):243–253. doi: 10.2466/pms.1976.42.1.243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spealman R. D. Psychomotor stimulant effects of methylxanthines in squirrel monkeys: relation to adenosine antagonism. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1988;95(1):19–24. doi: 10.1007/BF00212759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swift C. G., Tiplady B. The effects of age on the response to caffeine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1988;94(1):29–31. doi: 10.1007/BF00735876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tiplady B. A continuous attention test for the assessment of the acute behavioral effects of drugs. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988;24(2):213–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tiplady B., Fagan D., Lamont M., Brockway M., Scott D. B. A comparison of the CNS effects of enprofylline and theophylline in healthy subjects assessed by performance testing and subjective measures. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1990 Jul;30(1):55–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1990.tb03743.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turner P. Critical flicker frequency and centrally-acting drugs. Br J Ophthalmol. 1968 Mar;52(3):245–250. doi: 10.1136/bjo.52.3.245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]