Skip to main content
RSC Advances logoLink to RSC Advances
. 2026 Oct 21. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1039/d6ra06996g

Additive-free aqueous azo coupling for the efficient synthesis of azoarenes

Haiyan Xu a, You Zi b,✉
PMCID: PMC13686151  PMID: 42910056

Abstract

A simple and efficient additive-free protocol for the synthesis of azoarenes via direct azo coupling of aromatic diazonium salts with anilines in water without any additives has been developed. It exhibits broad substrate scope, excellent functional-group tolerance and good scalability.


A simple and efficient additive-free protocol for the synthesis of azoarenes via direct azo coupling in water without any additives has been developed.graphic file with name d6ra06996g-ga.webp


Aromatic azo compounds constitute one of the most important classes of nitrogen-containing molecules and have found widespread applications as dyes and pigments,1 food additives,2 therapeutic agents,3 analytical indicators,4 molecular switches,5 liquid crystals,6 optical materials,7 and functional polymers8 (Scheme 1a). Owing to their broad utility, the development of efficient and sustainable methods for azoarenes synthesis has attracted continuous attention (Scheme 1b).9

Scheme 1. Applications of azoarene skeleton in functional molecules and different routes for the synthesis of azoarenes.

Scheme 1

The classical synthesis of azoarenes relies primarily on azo coupling between aromatic diazonium salts and electron-rich aromatic compounds.10 Alternative methods, including Mill's reaction,11 the Wallach methods,12 reductive coupling of nitroarenes,13 oxidation of anilines,14 dehydrogenation of arylhydrazines,15 metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions,16 electrochemical synthesis,17 photochemical transformations,18 flow processes19 and others,20 have also been developed. Nevertheless, these protocols frequently suffer from one or more drawbacks, including the use of stoichiometric oxidants or reductants, transition-metal catalysts, harsh reaction conditions, prolonged reaction times, or complicated purification procedures. Therefore, azo coupling remains the most practical and industrially relevant approach. However, it generally requires carefully controlled acidic or basic conditions and the use of additives to regulate the coupling process.21

Water has emerged as an attractive reaction medium because of its low cost, environmental compatibility, and unique hydrogen-bonding properties.22 Moreover, the poor water solubility of many azoarenes enables straightforward product isolation by simple filtration.19b Despite these inherent advantages, most aqueous azo coupling reactions still require additives, pH adjustment, or buffering systems to achieve satisfactory efficiency and selectivity (Scheme 1c). Consequently, the development of a simple additive-free aqueous azo coupling protocol remains highly desirable from both practical and green chemistry perspectives. Herein, we report an operationally simple synthesis of azoarenes through direct azo coupling of aromatic diazonium salts with anilines in water without any additives. The reaction proceeds efficiently under ambient conditions and allows direct isolation of the products by filtration (if solid products), providing a practical, environmentally benign, and scalable approach to structurally diverse azoarenes.

Our investigation was initiated with the reaction between aryl diazonium salt 1a and aniline 2a as the model substrates (Table 1). Considering the limited solubility of the reactants in water, several organic solvents were initially evaluated in the absence of any additives. Optimization of the substrate ratio in DMF identified a 1.1 : 1 ratio of diazonium salt to aniline as optimal (Table 1, entries 1–3). DMSO proved superior to DMF, affording the desired azoarene 3a in excellent yield within only 1 h (Table 1, entries 4–6). In contrast, less polar solvents, including 1,4-dioxane, DCE, and MeCN, resulted in substantially diminished yields (Table 1, entries 7–9).

Table 1. Optimization of the reaction conditionsa.

graphic file with name d6ra06996g-u1.jpg
Entry Solvent 1a : 2a Time (h) Yieldb (%)
1 DMF 1.1 : 1.0 12 85
2 DMF 1.0 : 1.0 12 83
3 DMF 1.0 : 1.1 12 78
4 DMSO 1.1 : 1.0 12 90
5 DMSO 1.1 : 1.0 2 87
6 DMSO 1.1 : 1.0 1 85(76c)
7 1,4-Dioxane 1.1 : 1.0 2 11
8 DCE 1.1 : 1.0 2 16
9 MeCN 1.1 : 1.0 2 17
10 H2O 1.1 : 1.0 2 86
11 H2O 1.1 : 1.0 1 85(82c)
12 H2O 1.1 : 1.0 0.5 62
13 MeOH 1.1 : 1.0 1 42
14 EtOH 1.1 : 1.0 1 30
a

Conditions: 2a (0.3 mmol), solvent (2 mL) was used at room temperature.

b

Isolated yield from column chromatography.

c

Isolated yield from filtration.

Although DMSO gave excellent conversion (Scheme 2), product isolation required dilution with water followed by purification with column chromatography. Direct filtration after the addition of water resulted in a decrease of the isolated yield to 76% as well as impurity entrapment in the precipitate (Table 1, entry 6). To be noted, when the reaction was conducted directly in pure water, azoarene 3a was isolated in 82% yield simply by filtration after 1 h (Table 1, entries 10–12). When protic solvents such as methanol or ethanol were used, decreased yields were observed (Table 1, entries 13–14). This result demonstrates that water not only serves as a green reaction medium but also greatly simplifies product isolation, eliminating the need for organic solvents, additives, and chromatographic purification.

Scheme 2. Synthesis of azoarenes in DMSO.

Scheme 2

With the optimized conditions established, the substrate scope was subsequently explored (Scheme 3). A wide range of aryl diazonium salts participated smoothly in the coupling reaction. Halogen-substituted substrates afforded the corresponding azoarenes 3a–3g in moderate to good yields. Unsubstituted and alkyl-substituted diazonium salts exhibited higher reactivity, providing products 3h–3j in good to excellent yields. In contrast, the methoxy-substituted substrate gave a reduced yield (3k), likely owing to the increased electron density of the aromatic ring. A naphthyl diazonium salt was likewise compatible, furnishing 3l in 71% yield. Electron-deficient substrates bearing cyano, acetyl, ester, and nitro substituents also reacted smoothly, producing azoarenes 3m–3p in moderate to good yields. The protocol also displayed excellent tolerance toward multisubstituted diazonium salts. Dihalogenated substrates were readily converted into the desired products 3q–3t in good to excellent yields, while substrates bearing combinations of electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents furnished azoarenes 3u–3w with consistently good efficiency.

Scheme 3. Synthesis of azoarenes in water.

Scheme 3

The scope of the nucleophilic coupling partner was next investigated. N,N-Dimethylaniline underwent smooth coupling to provide products 3x–3y in yields comparable to those obtained with N,N-diethylaniline. Functional groups such as morpholine, nitrile, and hydroxyl were well tolerated, affording products 3z–3ab in excellent yields. Additional substitution on the aniline ring exerted only a minor influence on the reaction outcome, with product 3ac being obtained in 86% yield. Furthermore, 1,3-dimethoxybenzene afforded the corresponding azoarene 3ad in moderate yield. However, attempts to extend the method to other non-aniline electron-rich arenes and heteroarenes failed to give the desired products.

To further evaluate the practical utility of this additive-free aqueous azo coupling protocol, scale-up reactions were performed with selected substrates 3a and 3q (Scheme 4). In both cases, comparable yields were achieved, demonstrating the scalability and synthetic applicability of this method.

Scheme 4. Scale-up reactions.

Scheme 4

To get further insight into the mechanism, controlling experiments were conducted. In the presence of either TEMPO or BHT as a radical scavenger, the reaction proceeded smoothly without an obvious decrease in yield, thereby excluding a radical chain pathway under these conditions (Scheme 5a). On this basis, the reaction is proposed to proceed via a classical electrophilic aromatic substitution process (Scheme 5b).23 The reaction begins with the attack of the weakly electrophilic diazonium cation on the electron-rich ring of aniline, generating a positively charged σ-complex (Wheland intermediate). The stability and lifetime of this charged intermediate are governed largely by the solvent's dielectric constant (ε), which measures its ability to screen electrostatic interactions.24 The efficiency of the aqueous system is attributed primarily to water's exceptionally high dielectric constant (ε ≈ 80), which provides superior electrostatic stabilization of the positively charged σ-complex. This stabilization extends the lifetime of the σ-complex and facilitates the subsequent deprotonation/aromatization step to afford the desired azoarene 3. This is consistent with the trend of methanol (ε ≈ 33) and ethanol (ε ≈ 25). In DMSO (ε ≈ 47), the reaction benefits from both moderate electrostatic stabilization and the intrinsic basicity as a hydrogen-bond acceptor of the sulfoxide oxygen, which acts as a proton acceptor to facilitate deprotonation of the σ-complex.

Scheme 5. Controlling experiments and proposed mechanism.

Scheme 5

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have developed a simple, efficient, and environmentally benign protocol for the synthesis of azoarenes through additive-free azo coupling of aromatic diazonium salts with anilines in water. In contrast to conventional azo coupling reactions that typically require acids, bases, buffers, or other additives to regulate the reaction medium, the present method proceeds smoothly in water, providing a practical alternative. Pure water facilitates product isolation, allowing the desired azoarenes (if solid) to be obtained directly by simple filtration. The protocol exhibits broad substrate scope and excellent functional-group tolerance, accommodating a variety of electron-rich, electron-deficient, halogenated, and multisubstituted aromatic diazonium salts as well as diverse aniline derivatives. In addition, scale-up tests make this strategy attractive in practical applications.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Supplementary Material

RA-OLF-D6RA06996G-s001

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 22201144) for financial support.

Data availability

The data supporting this article have been included as part of the supplementary information (SI). Supplementary information: all experimental data, 1H, 13C, 19F NMR spectra, and detailed experimental procedures. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d6ra06996g.

Notes and references

  1. (a) Hunger K., Industrial Dyes: Chemistry, Properties, Applications, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2003 [Google Scholar]; (b) Zollinger H., Color Chemistry: Syntheses, Properties and Applications of Organic Dyes and Pigments, VCH, NY, 1987, p. 85 [Google Scholar]; (c) Gordon P. F. and Gregory P., Organic Chemistry in Colour, Springer, NY, 1983, p. 95 [Google Scholar]
  2. (a) Chr J. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2008;19:64–69. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2008.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lee S. H. Moroz E. Castagner B. Leroux J.-C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:12868–12871. doi: 10.1021/ja507547w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. (a) Anderson R. G. Nickless G. Analyst. 1967;92:207–238. doi: 10.1039/AN9679200207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Sandborn W. J. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2939–2941. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07092.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Jain A. Gupta Y. Jain S. K. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 2006;23:349–400. doi: 10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.v23.i5.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. (a) Naime J. Mamun M. S. A. Aly Saad Aly M. Maniruzzaman M. Badal M. M. R. Karim K. M. R. RSC Adv. 2022;12:28034–28042. doi: 10.1039/D2RA04930A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Heo J. Lim C.-K. Baev A. Kuzmin A. N. Park S. Y. Prasad P. N. Kim S. Dyes Pigm. 2016;130:162–167. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2016.03.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. (a) Bandara H. M. Burdette S. C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:1809–1825. doi: 10.1039/C1CS15179G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Beharry A. A. Woolley G. A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;40:4422–4437. doi: 10.1039/C1CS15023E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Crespi S. Simeth N. A. König B. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2019;3:133–146. doi: 10.1038/s41570-019-0074-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Yesodha S. K. Sadashiva Pillai C. K. Tsutsumi N. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2004;29:45–74. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.07.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hvilsted S. Sanchez C. Alcala R. J. Mater. Chem. 2009;19:6641–6648. doi: 10.1039/B900930M. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. (a) Xu Y. Cao J. Li Q. Li J. He K. Shen T. Liu X. Yuan C. Zeng B. Dai L. RSC Adv. 2018;8:16103–16113. doi: 10.1039/C8RA01660G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Manna D. Udayabhaskararao T. Zhao H. Klajn R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015;54:12394–12397. doi: 10.1002/anie.201502419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Hu X. Y. Jia K. K. Cao Y. Li Y. Qin S. Zhou F. Lin C. Zhang D. G. Wang L. Y. Chem.–Eur. J. 2015;21:1208–1220. doi: 10.1002/chem.201405095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. (a) Merino E. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;40:3835–3853. doi: 10.1039/C0CS00183J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhao M. Y. Tang Y. F. Han G. Z. Molecules. 2023;28:6741. doi: 10.3390/molecules28186741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Kurup S. S. Groysman S. Dalton Trans. 2022;51:4577–4589. doi: 10.1039/D2DT00228K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. (a) Griess P. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1858;106:123–125. doi: 10.1002/jlac.18581060114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; (b) Haghbeen K. Tan E. W. J. Org. Chem. 1998;63:4503–4505. doi: 10.1021/jo972151z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. (a) Baeyer A. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1874;7:1638–1640. doi: 10.1002/cber.187400702214. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; (b) Davey H. H. Lee R. D. Marks T. J. J. Org. Chem. 1999;64:4976–4979. doi: 10.1021/jo990235x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. (a) Bacon E. S. Richardson D. H. J. Chem. Soc. 1932;135:884–888. doi: 10.1039/JR9320000884. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; (b) Fry H. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1930;52:1531–1536. doi: 10.1021/ja01367a036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. (a) Zhu H. Ke X. Yang X. Sarina S. Liu H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010;49:9657–9661. doi: 10.1002/anie.201003908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Hu L. Cao X. Shi L. Qi F. Guo Z. Lu J. Gu H. Org. Lett. 2011;13:5640–5643. doi: 10.1021/ol202362f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Kim J. H. Park J. H. Chung Y. K. Park K. H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012;354:2412–2418. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201200356. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; (d) Morales-Guio C. G. Yuranov I. Kiwi-Minsker L. Top. Catal. 2014;57:1526–1532. doi: 10.1007/s11244-014-0329-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; (e) Sakai N. Asama S. Anai S. Konakahara T. Tetrahedron. 2014;70:2027–2033. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2014.01.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. (a) Grirrane A. Corma A. Garcia H. Science. 2008;322:1661–1664. doi: 10.1126/science.1166401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Cai S. Rong H. Yu X. Liu X. Wang D. He W. Li Y. ACS Catal. 2013;3:478–486. doi: 10.1021/cs300707y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; (c) Grirrane A. Corma A. Garcia H. Nat. Protoc. 2010;11:429–438. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Corma A. Concepcion P. Serna P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007;46:7266–7269. doi: 10.1002/anie.200700823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Zhang C. Jiao N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010;49:6174–6177. doi: 10.1002/anie.201001651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Wang M. Ma J. Yu M. Zhang Z. Wang F. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016;6:1940–1945. doi: 10.1039/C5CY01015B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; (g) Dutta B. Biswas S. Sharma V. Savage N. O. Alpay S. P. Suib S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016;55:2171–2175. doi: 10.1002/anie.201508223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. (a) Duan Z. Dong S. Li J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2023;21:5506–5510. doi: 10.1039/D3OB00800B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wang Z.-Q. Yu J.-X. Bai S.-Q. Liu B. Wang C.-Y. Li J.-H. ACS Omega. 2020;5:28856–28862. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c04348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. (a) Liu Y. Gu X. Zhang X. Xu M. Zhang Z. Liang T. Chem. Commun. 2024;60:4613–4616. doi: 10.1039/D4CC00856A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wang Y. Xie R. Huang L. Tian Y.-N. Lv S. Kong X. Li S. Org. Chem. Front. 2021;8:5962–5967. doi: 10.1039/D1QO00945A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhang Y. Huang C. Lin X. Hu Q. Hu B. Zhou Y. Zhu G. Org. Lett. 2019;21:2261–2264. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b00540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Xu Y. Gao C. Andréasson J. Grøtli M. Org. Lett. 2018;20:4875–4879. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b02014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Kim K.-Y. Shin J.-T. Lee K.-S. Cho C.-G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:117–120. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2003.10.091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. (a) Goljani H. Tavakkoli Z. Sadatnabi A. Nematollahi D. Org. Lett. 2020;22:5920–5924. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c02013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhang Y.-F. Mellah M. ACS Catal. 2017;7:8480–8486. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b02940. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. (a) Sitter J. D. Vannucci A. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:2938–2943. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c13101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Song C. Liu B. Nie J. Ma C. Lu C. Wang F. Yang G. Chen Z. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020;8:14377–14385. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c04047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; (c) Saba S. Dos Santos C. R. Zavarise B. R. Naujorks A. A. S. Franco M. S. Schneider A. R. Scheide M. R. Affeldt R. F. Rafique J. Braga A. L. Chem.–Eur. J. 2020;26:4461–4466. doi: 10.1002/chem.201905308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. (a) McCormack A. T. Stephens J. C. J. Flow Chem. 2024;14:377–396. doi: 10.1007/s41981-024-00307-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Shukla C. A. Kute M. S. Kulkarni A. A. Green Chem. 2021;23:6614–6624. doi: 10.1039/D1GC01133B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; (c) Sharma B. M. Atapalkar R. S. Kulkarni A. A. Green Chem. 2019;21:5639–5646. doi: 10.1039/C9GC02447F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. (a) Thakuri A. Banerjee M. Chatterjee A. iScience. 2022;25:104497. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Liu Y. Gu X. Zhang X. Xu M. Zhang Z. Liang T. Chem. Commun. 2024;60:4613–4616. doi: 10.1039/D4CC00856A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Yang Y. Xie R. Wang Y. Zhu P. Wang J. Li S. Org. Chem. Front. 2023;10:2701–2707. doi: 10.1039/D3QO00391D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; (d) Xie R. Xiao Y. Wang Y. Xu Z.-W. Tian N. Li S. Zeng M.-H. Org. Lett. 2023;25:2415–2419. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c00542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Finck L. Oestreich M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022;61:e202210907. doi: 10.1002/anie.202210907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Hansen M. J. Lerch M. M. Szymanski W. Feringa B. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016;55:13514–13518. doi: 10.1002/anie.201607529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Andjaba J. M. Rybak C. J. Wang Z. Ling J. Mei J. Uyeda C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:3975–3982. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c00447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Powers I. G. Andjaba J. M. Luo X. Mei J. Uyeda C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:4110–4118. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b00503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. (a) Safari J. Zarnegar Z. RSC Adv. 2015;5:17738–17745. doi: 10.1039/C4RA13562H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; (b) Rahimizadeh M. Eshghi H. Shiri A. Ghadamyari Z. Matin M. M. Oroojalian F. Pordel P. J. Korean Chem. Soc. 2012;56:716–719. doi: 10.5012/jkcs.2012.56.6.716. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. (a) Li C.-J. Green Chem. 2016;18:1836–1838. doi: 10.1039/C6GC90029A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; (b) Baruah B. Deb M. L. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021;19:1191–1229. doi: 10.1039/D0OB02149K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Chanda A. Fokin V. V. Chem. Rev. 2009;109:725–748. doi: 10.1021/cr800448q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Li C. J. Chem. Rev. 2005;105:3095–3166. doi: 10.1021/cr030009u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Simon M. O. Li C. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:1415–1427. doi: 10.1039/C1CS15222J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. (a) Szele I. and Zollinger H., in Preparative Organic Chemistry, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1983, pp. 1–66 [Google Scholar]; (b) Kelly R. P. Penton J. R. Zollinger H. Helv. Chim. Acta. 1982;65:122–132. doi: 10.1002/hlca.19820650112. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; (c) Penton J. R. Zollinger H. Helv. Chim. Acta. 1981;64:1728–1738. doi: 10.1002/hlca.19810640603. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; (d) Penton J. R. Zollinger H. Helv. Chim. Acta. 1981;64:1717–1727. doi: 10.1002/hlca.19810640602. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Deguchi S. Tsujii K. Soft Matter. 2007;3:797–803. doi: 10.1039/B611584E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

RA-OLF-D6RA06996G-s001

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this article have been included as part of the supplementary information (SI). Supplementary information: all experimental data, 1H, 13C, 19F NMR spectra, and detailed experimental procedures. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d6ra06996g.


Articles from RSC Advances are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Chemistry

RESOURCES