Skip to main content
Journal of Oral Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Oral Microbiology
. 2026 Oct 20;18(1):2751754. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2026.2751754

Host-driven citrullination of extracellular vesicle–derived microbial proteins links P orphyromonas gingivalis to rheumatoid arthritis

Xuefei Cheng a, Weichen Gong b,c,*
PMCID: PMC13686182  PMID: 42910306

Abstract

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is closely linked to citrullinated antigens and HLA-DRB1 risk alleles, yet the origin of immunogenic citrullinated peptides remains incompletely understood. While Porphyromonas gingivalis has been implicated in RA through its bacterial peptidylarginine deiminase (PPAD), previous studies using PPAD-deficient P. gingivalis in mouse RA models reported that PPAD deletion did not attenuate disease development, suggesting the existence of additional RA-promoting mechanisms. Here, we computationally evaluate a complementary mechanism in which host peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PADI4) may modify P. gingivalis-derived proteins, generating microbial neoantigens with preferential presentation by RA-associated HLA alleles.

Methods

We developed a computational framework integrating known PADI4 and PPAD substrate preferences with MHC-II antigen presentation prediction. Human proteins were first stratified based on their susceptibility to PADI4 and/or PPAD-mediated citrullination, and their presentation profiles across RA risk-associated (HLA-DRB1*04:01 and 04:04) and protective (HLA-DRB1*13:01 and 13:02)alleles were analyzed through MHC-II binding prediction.

Results

This analysis revealed distinct presentation signatures, including (a) global risk enrichment, (b) high-affinity binding bias, (c) characteristic allelic presentation ratios. Application of these three features led to the identification of five candidate proteins with potential relevance to RA risk, including gingipain R1 and four outer membrane proteins.

Conclusions

These findings propose a hypothesis that host PADI4-mediated citrullination of P. gingivalis proteins may represent an additional mechanism contributing to P. gingivalis-associated acceleration of RA pathogenesis.

Keywords: Porphyromonas gingivalis, rheumatoid arthritis, host-driven citrullination, outer membrane vesicles, citrullinated autoantigen

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name ZJOM_A_2751754_UF0001_C.webp

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by persistent synovial inflammation and the production of autoantibodies against citrullinated proteins [1]. Protein citrullination, a post-translational modification catalyzed by peptidylarginine deiminases, has been widely implicated in the generation of neoantigens that break immune tolerance [2]. Among these enzymes, PADI4 has been extensively studied and is strongly associated with RA susceptibility, particularly through its role in modifying host proteins such as vimentin, α-enolase, and calreticulin [3–6]. Citrullinated vimentin is one of the most well-characterized autoantigens in RA, with anti–mutated citrullinated vimentin antibodies correlating with disease severity and joint damage [7]. Similarly, α-enolase has been identified as a major citrullinated autoantigen, and antibodies against citrullinated α-enolase peptides (e.g. CEP-1) have been linked to both genetic risk factors and environmental triggers such as smoking [8]. Calreticulin has also been reported to undergo citrullination and contribute to immune activation, potentially through its roles in antigen presentation and modulation of innate immune signaling [9]. These citrullinated proteins are frequently targeted by anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs), which are highly specific for RA and are thought to play a central role in disease pathogenesis.

In addition to host-derived citrullination, microbial factors have been proposed to contribute to RA pathogenesis. Among microbial sources of citrullination, Porphyromonas species have attracted particular attention because several members encode bacterial peptidylarginine deiminase (PPAD)-like enzymes. Although PPAD was initially considered unique to P. gingivalis, subsequent studies identified conserved and secreted PPAD homologues in other Porphyromonas species, including P. gulae and P. loveana. Notably, PPAD in these species is predominantly associated with outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), suggesting that vesicular transport may represent a conserved mechanism for delivering bacterial citrullinating activity. Nevertheless, P. gingivalis remains the most extensively investigated species in the context of RA, whereas the clinical relevance of PPAD-producing species such as P. gulae remains less clear [10,11]. PPAD-mediated modification of host proteins, particularly fibrinogen, has been proposed as one potential mechanism linking periodontitis to RA [12]. Biochemical studies have shown that P. gingivalis can process host proteins through gingipain activity and subsequently generate citrullinated peptides via PPAD, including epitopes derived from fibrinogen, vimentin, α-enolase, and calreticulin [12–14]. These findings suggest that PPAD may contribute to the generation of immunogenic citrullinated neo-epitopes capable of triggering ACPA responses. However, evidence from experimental models suggests that PPAD alone may not fully account for the pro-arthritogenic effects of P. gingivalis. In a mouse model of experimental arthritis, oral inoculation with P. gingivalis exacerbated joint inflammation and increased citrullinated protein levels, whereas the use of a PPAD-deficient mutant did not result in a clear attenuation of disease severity or systemic inflammatory responses. Notably, host-derived PAD enzymes, including PADI4, remained detectable in joint tissues and were not significantly altered by PPAD deletion [15]. Given that PADI4 is highly expressed in inflammatory environments and capable of modifying a broad range of substrates [16], we hypothesized that P. gingivalis-derived proteins—particularly those released through OMV—may serve as substrates for host PADI4. Such a mechanism would provide an alternative route for the generation of citrullinated microbial neoantigens, thereby contributing to RA pathogenesis through a PPAD-independent pathway. P. gingivalis should not be regarded simply as an infectious agent whose presence is synonymous with periodontal infection. Rather, it is currently considered a periodontal pathobiont and keystone species that may be detected in both periodontally healthy individuals and patients with different stages of periodontal disease. Periodontitis is now understood as a chronic inflammatory disease arising from dysbiotic microbial communities and a susceptible host response, rather than from infection by a single bacterial species. Accordingly, throughout this study, the potential contribution of P. gingivalis to RA is considered in the context of dysbiotic colonization and exposure to its virulence factors and extracellular products [17,18].

These observations raise a critical unresolved question: what are the relevant antigenic substrates that sustain citrullination-driven autoimmunity in RA? While several host proteins have been identified as targets of PADI4, recent proteome-wide studies have revealed that PADI4-mediated citrullination is far more widespread than previously appreciated [19]. Notably, large-scale citrullinome analyses have identified thousands of citrullination sites across diverse classes of proteins, yet only a limited subset has been convincingly linked to RA pathogenesis [19]. This discrepancy suggests that the mere presence of citrullination is insufficient to explain disease-specific autoimmunity. Instead, additional layers of selection—particularly antigen processing and presentation—are likely required to determine immunological relevance.

Consistent with this notion, genetic studies have identified the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II region as the strongest risk locus for RA, with specific HLA-DRB1 alleles playing a central role in shaping disease susceptibility [20]. Variants encoding the so-called ‘shared epitope,’ particularly HLA-DRB1*04:01 and 04:04 [21,22], are strongly associated with increased risk of ACPA-positive RA, whereas alleles such as HLA-DRB1*13:01 and 13:02 confer protective effects [23–25]. These alleles differ in their peptide-binding grooves and are thought to influence both the repertoire and efficiency of antigen presentation, thereby shaping downstream adaptive immune responses. Together, these findings suggest that antigen presentation, rather than citrullination alone, may represent a critical bottleneck in determining which antigens become immunologically relevant in RA.

In principle, the pathogenic potential of a given protein would be best evaluated by integrating both its susceptibility to citrullination and its capacity to be presented by disease-associated MHC-II molecules. However, predicting the precise sites of citrullination remains challenging due to the context-dependent nature of this modification, which often requires experimental validation. Therefore, alternative strategies that bypass explicit site prediction while capturing immunological relevance are needed. In parallel, microbial proteins represent a largely unexplored source of potential antigens, particularly in the context of systemic dissemination. Bacterial OMVs have emerged as important mediators of host–microbe interactions, capable of transporting diverse bacterial proteins beyond the site of periodontal niche [26]. OMVs released by P. gingivalis can enter the circulation and deliver a repertoire of microbial proteins to distal tissues, thereby providing a plausible route for microbial antigens to access host enzymatic machinery and immune surveillance systems. Importantly, P. gingivalis OMVs are not passive carriers of randomly packaged bacterial proteins. Proteomic and functional studies have demonstrated enrichment of major virulence-associated components, including gingipains, hemagglutinins, and fimbrial proteins, and have further shown that fimbrial expression can influence both OMV production and host-cell invasion. Thus, OMVs provide a biologically relevant vehicle through which multiple P. gingivalis antigens and virulence factors may be simultaneously exposed to host tissues and immune surveillance. This feature is particularly relevant to RA because several OMV-associated proteins, especially gingipains, have independently been associated with RA-related immune responses [27].

To address these challenges, we developed a computational framework that leverages antigen presentation as a filtering layer to prioritize candidate antigens. Rather than relying on predefined citrullination sites, our approach is based on the primary amino acid sequences of proteins and their intrinsic capacity to be presented by MHC-II molecules. By comparing peptide binding preferences between RA-risk and protective HLA-DRB1 alleles, we aimed to identify candidate microbial antigens that are preferentially presented in a disease-associated immunogenetic context.

Previous clinical, biochemical, and experimental studies have already established substantial evidence linking P. gingivalis, gingipains, PPAD-mediated citrullination, and RA-associated autoimmunity. Therefore, the objective of the present study was not to propose P. gingivalis as a previously unrecognized contributor to RA. Rather, we sought to address a distinct unresolved question: whether P. gingivalis OMV proteins can be systematically prioritized according to their compatibility with host PADI4-mediated modification and RA-associated HLA antigen presentation. We therefore developed an integrative computational framework to identify microbial proteins displaying convergent RA-risk HLA presentation signatures and to evaluate whether such candidates overlap with proteins previously implicated by experimental or clinical evidence (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

A six panel diagram shows a pathway from P gingivalis infection to RA pathogenesis acceleration, with a legend at the bottom. The six panel diagram illustrates a proposed mechanism linking P gingivalis infection to RA pathogenesis acceleration. A legend at the bottom defines symbols. Panel 1 shows P gingivalis colonizing the gingival sulcus. Panel 2 depicts the release of extracellular vesicles containing diverse proteins. Panel 3 illustrates EV derived proteins being taken up by host cells and citrullinated by host PADI4, with an inset showing the chemical conversion of arginine to citrulline. Panel 4 shows citrullinated peptides being preferentially presented by RA risk HLA DR alleles. Panel 5 depicts the presentation of citrullinated P gingivalis peptides activating autoreactive CD4 plus T cells, leading to cytokine production. Panel 6 illustrates enhanced immune responses promoting synovial inflammation, autoantibody production, and joint destruction. Arrows indicate the progression from one panel to the next.

Proposed model linking host PADI4-mediated citrullination of P. gingivalis proteins to RA pathogenesis. Schematic illustration of the proposed mechanism by which P. gingivalis contributes to RA through host-mediated citrullination of microbial proteins.

Results

Comparative analysis of antigen presentation patterns between PADI4- and PPAD-mediated citrullination

Building on the observations above, we next sought to systematically examine how different sources of citrullination may influence antigen presentation in RA. To this end, we stratified proteins into three categories based on their predominant citrullination source: (i) proteins primarily modified by host PADI4 (encoded by LMNB1, LMNA, HNRNPA2B1) [19], (ii) proteins subject to both PADI4- and PPAD-mediated citrullination (encoded by VIM, ENO1, CALR), and (iii) proteins predominantly citrullinated by bacterial PPAD (fibrinogen α, β, and γ chains).

Notably, proteins within the PADI4-dominant group, including LMNB1, LMNA, and HNRNPA2B1, are functionally enriched in essential nuclear and regulatory processes. LMNB1 and LMNA encode lamin B1 and lamin A/C, respectively, which are key structural components of the nuclear lamina and play critical roles in maintaining nuclear architecture, chromatin organization, and genome stability [28]. These proteins are also involved in regulating DNA replication, transcription, and mechanotransduction, highlighting their fundamental role in cellular homeostasis [29]. In parallel, HNRNPA2B1 encodes a heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein that is central to RNA metabolism, including pre-mRNA splicing, mRNA transport, and stress response regulation [30]. Importantly, large-scale proteomic analyses have identified these proteins as major substrates of PADI4-mediated citrullination, particularly in the context of transcriptional regulation and RNA processing [19]. Given their involvement in core cellular functions, citrullination of these proteins is likely to represent a physiologically regulated process rather than a disease-specific event. This may explain why peptides derived from the PADI4-dominant group do not exhibit a clear bias toward presentation by RA-associated HLA-DRB1 risk alleles. In contrast to proteins associated with inflammation or extracellular exposure, these nuclear and RNA-binding proteins may be less prone to generating immunodominant epitopes, thereby limiting their contribution to pathogenic ACPA responses. Consistent with this notion, we observed that peptides derived from the PADI4-dominant group did not exhibit a clear or preferential binding pattern toward RA-risk HLA-DRB1 alleles, suggesting that endogenous citrullination alone may not be sufficient to drive disease-specific antigen presentation.

Given that proteins predominantly modified by PADI4 alone, including LMNB1, LMNA, and HNRNPA2B1, did not exhibit such preferential presentation patterns, suggesting that PADI4-mediated citrullination in isolation is insufficient to drive RA-associated antigenicity. Based on these observations, we next focused on systematically comparing proteins co-modified by PADI4 and PPAD with those predominantly modified by PPAD alone. In this context, PPAD-driven citrullination was used as a reference baseline to evaluate how the additional contribution of host PADI4 reshapes antigen presentation profiles. Then, we found that peptides derived from proteins co-modified by both PADI4 and PPAD displayed a markedly enhanced binding affinity toward the RA-risk allele HLA-DRB1*04:01 (Figure 2A). Furthermore, quantitative comparison of peptide presentation revealed that these dual-modified proteins generated a significantly higher number of peptides presented by RA-risk alleles relative to protective alleles (Figure 2B).

Figure 2.

Two panel diagram with heatmap and box plots comparing antigen presentation patterns across protein groups and HLA alleles. A two panel diagram. Panel A is a heatmap with nine rows of proteins grouped into PADI4, PADI4 and PPAD, and PPAD, and four columns of HLA DRB1 alleles. A legend indicates values from 0 to 2. The PADI4 group shows mixed patterns. The PADI4 and PPAD group shows higher values for risk alleles 04 01 and 04 04 compared to protective alleles 13 01 and 13 02. The PPAD group shows higher values for protective alleles. One cell for HNRNPA2B1 and allele 13 02 is crossed out. Panel B contains two box plots with vertical axes labeled Rank percentage from 0 to 1.2. The left plot for PPAD shows box plots for FGA, FGB, and FGG. Risk alleles are lower than protective alleles for FGA and FGB, and similar for FGG. The right plot for PADI4 and PPAD shows box plots for ENO1, CALR, and VIM. Risk alleles are consistently much lower than protective alleles for all three proteins, with risk allele values near 0 and protective allele values ranging from approximately 0.1 to 1.0.

Differential antigen presentation patterns across citrullination-defined protein groups. (A) Heatmap showing predicted antigen presentation patterns of representative proteins categorized by citrullination source: PADI4-dominant (LMNB1, LMNA, HNRNPA2B1), co-modified by PADI4 and PPAD (VIM, ENO1, CALR), and PPAD-dominant (FGA, FGB, FGG). Antigen presentation was evaluated across RA-risk HLA-DRB1 risk alleles (DRB1*04:01, DRB1*04:04) and protective alleles (DRB1*13:01, DRB1*13:02). Color intensity indicates relative binding affinity (IEDB rank-based scoring). PADI4-dominant proteins do not exhibit a consistent risk allele–biased presentation pattern, whereas co-modified proteins show preferential presentation by risk alleles. (B) Distribution of predicted binding affinities for peptides derived from PPAD-dominant proteins (left) and PADI4&PPAD co-modified proteins (right). Risk-associated alleles (red) and protective alleles (green) are compared. Co-modified proteins display a clear enrichment of high-affinity peptides presented by risk alleles, while PPAD-dominant proteins do not show a comparable bias.

Collectively, these results suggest that the interplay between host- and microbe-mediated citrullination may critically influence antigen presentation landscapes. Rather than acting independently, PADI4 may modulate PPAD-derived substrates to generate a distinct pool of neo-epitopes with enhanced presentation by RA-associated HLA alleles, thereby providing a potential mechanistic basis for the amplification of autoimmune responses.

Development of a systematic framework to identify risk-enriched antigen presentation signatures

To systematically identify antigens preferentially presented by RA-associated alleles, we established a multi-criteria screening framework based on three complementary dimensions: (a) global risk enrichment pattern, (b) high-affinity risk bias, and (c) allelic presentation ratio signature.

To enable quantitative and reproducible prioritization, explicit thresholds were defined for each dimension. For the global risk enrichment pattern, peptides predicted to bind MHC-II molecules with high confidence (IEDB rank ≤ 1%) were considered, and candidate antigens were required to exhibit a ≥80% proportion of presentations by RA-risk alleles (Figure 3A). For the high-affinity risk bias, the top 25 highest-affinity peptides were required to be exclusively presented by risk alleles (Figure 3B). For the allelic presentation ratio signature, each RA-risk allele was compared individually with each protective allele. Significant risk-biased presentation was observed in three comparisons within the PADI4&PPAD co-modified protein group, whereas the PPAD-dominant group did not show comparable differences. The mean values from these significant PADI4&PPAD-derived ratios were therefore used as reference thresholds for downstream screening of P. gingivalis-derived proteins (Figure 3C).

Figure 3.

A three panel diagram with bar graphs and a heatmap comparing HLA DRB1 allele presentation across different antigen proteins. The three panel diagram compares HLA DRB1 allele presentation across different antigen proteins. Panel A shows a stacked bar graph titled Global risk enrichment pattern with vertical axis from 0 to 100 percentage. Six bars represent proteins ENO1, CALR, VIM, FGA, FGB, and FGG. Each bar is stacked with four alleles: DRB1 04 01, DRB1 04 04, DRB1 13 01, and DRB1 13 02. Numeric values are printed within the stacks, for example, ENO1 has 81, 57, 18, and 8. Panel B is a heatmap titled High affinity risk bias with 25 rows numbered 1 to 25 and six columns for the same proteins. The cells are colored according to the four alleles in the legend. ENO1, CALR, and VIM columns are dominated by DRB1 04 01 and DRB1 04 04, while FGA, FGB, and FGG show more DRB1 13 01 and DRB1 13 02. Panel C contains three bar graphs under the title Allelic Presentation Ratio Signature. The left graph compares PADI4 and PPAD and PPAD across the four alleles. The middle graph for PADI4 and PPAD shows significant differences between DRB1 04 01 and DRB1 13 01, DRB1 04 01 and DRB1 13 02, and DRB1 04 04 and DRB1 13 02, indicated by asterisks. The right graph for PPAD shows no significant differences between alleles, indicated by ns. All graphs in Panel C have vertical axes from 0 to 100 percentage and error bars.

Multi-layered HLA-dependent antigen presentation framework reveals risk-biased signatures and enables candidate selection criteria. (A) Global risk allele enrichment patterns across representative antigens. Stacked bar plots show the proportion of predicted antigen presentation events attributed to individual HLA-DRB1 alleles for each protein. Risk-associated alleles (DRB1*04:01 and DRB1*04:04) dominate the presentation landscape for citrullination-independent proteins (ENO1: α-enolase, CALR: calreticulin, and VIM: vimentin), whereas citrullination-dependent proteins (FGA, FGB, and FGG: fibrinogen α, β, and γ chains) display a more balanced or protective allele–enriched distribution. These results indicate a global risk allele bias specific to citrullination-independent antigens. (B) High-affinity risk bias in top-ranked antigen presentation. Heatmap representation of the top 25 predicted peptide–HLA binding events for each protein. Each row corresponds to one of the highest-affinity presentation events, and columns represent individual HLA alleles. Citrullination-independent proteins exhibit a strong dominance of risk-associated alleles among top-ranked binders, with minimal contribution from protective alleles. In contrast, citrullination-dependent proteins show more heterogeneous allele representation, indicating reduced specificity toward risk alleles at the high-affinity level. (C) Left panel: Overall distribution of predicted antigen presentation proportions across HLA-DRB1 alleles for proteins co-modified by PADI4 and PPAD (red) and PPAD-dominant proteins (green). Middle panel: Quantitative comparison of presentation ratios for PADI4&PPAD co-modified proteins across individual HLA alleles. Risk-associated alleles (HLA-DRB1*04:01 and 04:04) show significantly higher presentation proportions compared to protective alleles (HLA-DRB1*13:01 and 13:02). Right panel: Corresponding analysis for PPAD-dominant proteins, which do not exhibit significant differences between risk and protective alleles. Statistical significance between risk-associated alleles and protective alleles was evaluated using unpaired two-tailed Student's t-tests. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*, P < 0.05; ns, not significant).

These thresholds were derived from the antigen presentation profiles of known RA-associated host proteins and were subsequently applied to prioritize P. gingivalis-derived proteins with a high likelihood of undergoing host PADI4-mediated citrullination.

Identification of P. gingivalis-derived proteins with convergent risk-associated presentation features

We next applied this framework to proteins derived from P. gingivalis OMVs, given that OMVs can disseminate systemically from periodontal sites and thereby provide a plausible mechanistic link between the dysbiotic periodontal niche and RA pathogenesis. To ensure robustness and reproducibility, we analyzed previously reported OMV proteomic datasets rather than performing de novo protein identification [31].

Across the P. gingivalis OMV proteome, substantial heterogeneity in predicted antigen presentation profiles was observed. Application of the global risk enrichment criterion (≥80% risk allele presentation among peptides with IEDB rank ≤ 1%) identified 18 candidate proteins (Figure 4). Among these, 16 proteins further satisfied the high-affinity risk bias criterion, with the top 25 predicted binders exclusively associated with RA-risk alleles (Figure 5). Subsequent evaluation using the allelic presentation ratio signature refined the candidate set to 8 proteins that exhibited consistent risk-biased presentation patterns relative to protective alleles (Figure 6). Integration across all three criteria ultimately yielded five proteins (UniProt IDs: B2RM93, F5X8K0, B2RHG4, OMP41, and Q7MTV9) that simultaneously satisfied all selection thresholds (Figure 7A,B).

Figure 4.

Stacked bar graph shows proportions of antigen presentation events for many proteins, with a shaded region above 80 percent. A stacked bar graph titled Global Risk Enrichment Pattern displays the proportion of predicted antigen presentation events for numerous individual proteins. The vertical axis ranges from 0 percent to 100 percent, with major ticks every 10 percent. The horizontal axis lists many specific protein identifiers, such as B2RII3 PORG3, F5XCD4 PORGT, and Q7MXJ1 PORGI, with some labels in red text. Each protein is represented by a single stacked bar, composed of four distinct segments. The segments represent different HLA DRB1 alleles, with the bottom segment being the largest for most proteins. A shaded region covers the area from 80 percent to 100 percent on the vertical axis, indicating a threshold. The proportions of the four segments vary significantly across the different proteins, with some proteins having a much larger top segment than others. The overall pattern shows a diverse distribution of presentation events among the alleles for the various proteins.

Global risk allele enrichment patterns across proteins derived from Porphyromonas gingivalis OMVs. Stacked bar plots show the proportion of predicted antigen presentation events attributed to individual HLA-DRB1 alleles for each OMV protein. A substantial subset of proteins exhibits enrichment of presentation events in risk-associated alleles (DRB1*04:01 and 04:04), exceeding the predefined threshold (shaded region), indicating a global risk-biased presentation pattern.

Figure 5.

A heatmap shows the distribution of top ranked binding events for various proteins across four different HLA alleles. A heatmap titled High Affinity Risk Bias displays the distribution of top ranked binding events for numerous proteins across four HLA alleles. The horizontal axis is numbered 1 to 25, representing ranked binding events. The vertical axis lists protein accession numbers, with some highlighted in red. The heatmap is composed of colored cells, with a legend indicating the HLA allele associated with each color: HLA DRB1 04 01, HLA DRB1 04 04, HLA DRB1 13 01, and HLA DRB1 13 02. The distribution of colors varies across the rows, showing different patterns of allele association for each protein. Some rows are predominantly one color, while others are a mix. There are also some white, uncolored cells within the grid.

High-affinity risk bias among top-ranked peptide–HLA interactions. Heatmap showing the distribution of the top 25 predicted binding events for each OMV protein across HLA alleles. Each row corresponds to an individual protein, and columns represent ranked high-affinity binding events. Proteins displaying a dominant contribution from risk-associated alleles among top-ranked binders are highlighted (red labels), consistent with a high-affinity risk bias.

Figure 6.

A three panel bar graph shows allelic presentation ratios for numerous proteins across different allele comparisons. A three panel bar graph titled Allelic Presentation Ratio Signature displays ratios for numerous proteins across different allele comparisons. The vertical axis for each panel is labeled with an allele comparison: 04:04 over 13:02, 04:01 over 13:02, and 04:01 over 13:01. The horizontal axis lists numerous protein identifiers, including Standard, B2RII3 PORGI, F5XCD4 PORGT, B2RM93 PORGI, Q7MXJ1 PORGI, F5X8K0 PORGT, Q7MTY9 PORGI, G1UBU0 PORGT, CPG2 PORGI, DHE2 PORGI, F5X7E6 PORGT, F5XBX6 PORGT, B2RIM9 PORG3, F5X867 PORGT, B2RHG4 PORG3, F5XCD5 PORGT, Q7MX64 PORGI, KGP PORG3, OMP41 PORGI, I8UMV1 PORGN, I8UE58 PORGN, F5X8W1 PORGT, I8UNL7 PORGN, I9E866 PORGN, Q7MXI9 PORGI, I8US28 PORGN, F5XCE9 PORGT, I9E1A0 PORGN, I8UNQ1 PORGN, I9PCW3 PORGN, F5X9V1 PORGT, B2RI32 PORG3, B2RIG1 PORG3, F5X7E8 PORGT, B2RI82 PORG3, B2RJV3 PORG3, B2RM02 PORG3, B2RMK3 PORGI, Q7MXX1 PORGI, Q7MX17 PORGI, Q7MWU6 PORGI, Q7MUU8 PORGI, Q7MUA6 PORGI, Q7MTV9 PORGI, Q7MT25 PORGI, F5X7B2 PORGT, F5X8N0 PORGT, F5XC99 PORGT, Q7MXJ7 PORGI, B2RIP7 PORG3, F5XC89 PORGT, B2RKE7 PORG3, Q7MUU6 PORGI, I9PH97 PORGN, Q7MXJ9 PORGI, I8UMU4 PORGN, and F5X8P7 PORGT. Each panel features a dashed horizontal line indicating a threshold. Bars in each panel show varying ratios for the proteins, with some exceeding the threshold and others remaining below.

Allelic presentation ratio signatures across OMV proteins. Bar plots illustrate the ratios of antigen presentation between risk-associated and protective alleles for each protein under different allele comparisons. Proteins exceeding the predefined ratio thresholds (dashed lines) are identified as exhibiting a risk-skewed presentation profile. Consistent enrichment of risk allele presentation across multiple ratio comparisons further refines candidate selection.

Figure 7.

A two panel diagram shows a Venn diagram with protein counts and a schematic of a bacterium releasing outer membrane. The two panel diagram presents a Venn diagram and a schematic of a bacterium. Panel A shows a Venn diagram with three overlapping circles labeled High Affinity Risk Bias, Global Risk Enrichment Pattern, and Allelic Presentation Ratio Signature. The counts in the non overlapping regions are 7, 2, and 3 respectively. The overlapping regions contain counts of 6 and 5. An arrow points from the central intersection of 5 to a box listing five proteins with their UniProt IDs and annotations: Gingipain R1, thiol protease B2RM93; OmpH, cationic outer membrane protein F5X8K0; Mfa4, minor fimbrium tip subunit Mfa4 B2RHG4; Outer membrane protein 41 OMP41; and Outer membrane protein beta barrel domain containing protein Q7MTV9. Panel B displays a schematic of Porphyromonas gingivalis releasing outer membrane vesicles into a gingival pocket. A legend for protein cargo lists counts for Outer membrane 31, Periplasmic proteins 9, Cytoplasmic proteins 8, Inner membrane 1, and Extracellular proteins 14. The diagram labels Outer membrane membrane, Cell envelope membrane, Cetoplasmi area, Gum tissue, and Gingival pocket. Below the schematic, five proteins are listed with their locations: Gingipain R1 Extracellular, OmpH Outer membrane, Mfa4 Outer membrane, OMP41 Outer membrane, and Q7MTV9 Outer membrane.

Application of the HLA-dependent antigen presentation framework identifies candidate P. gingivalis OMV proteins with risk-biased presentation signatures. (A) Venn diagram illustrating the overlap among proteins satisfying the three screening features: global risk enrichment pattern, high-affinity risk bias, and allelic presentation ratio signature. A total of five proteins were consistently identified at the intersection of all three criteria. The corresponding UniProt IDs and protein annotations are listed below, including gingipain R1 (B2RM93), OmpH (F5X8K0), Mfa4 (B2RHG4), OMP41, and Q7MTV9. (B) Schematic representation of P. gingivalis and its OMV release, highlighting the localization of the five prioritized proteins. Four proteins are annotated as outer membrane components, while gingipain R1 is an extracellularly secreted protease. The distribution of these proteins across bacterial compartments supports their accessibility to the host immune system following OMV-mediated dissemination.

Notably, four of the five prioritized proteins were annotated as outer membrane-associated proteins (F5X8K0, B2RHG4, OMP41, and Q7MTV9), whereas the remaining candidate was gingipain R1 (RgpA; B2RM93), an arginine-specific cysteine protease and major virulence factor of P. gingivalis. The identification of RgpA is particularly notable because gingipains are abundant and biologically active components associated with P. gingivalis OMVs. Beyond their general roles in bacterial virulence, gingipains may be mechanistically relevant to citrullination by cleaving host proteins at arginine residues and thereby generating C-terminal arginine-containing substrates accessible to PPAD. In addition, humoral responses against gingipains have been repeatedly associated with RA. Increased antibodies against arginine gingipains have been reported in individuals before the clinical onset of RA, while combined anti-RgpA and anti-PPAD antibody responses have also been investigated as serological indicators of RA. Thus, the independent prioritization of RgpA by our HLA-based computational screening is consistent with existing clinical and biochemical evidence linking gingipain-associated antigen exposure to RA [32,33].

Together, these findings highlight a convergent subset of OMV-associated proteins that are not only systemically accessible but also exhibit strong bias toward presentation by RA-risk HLA-DRB1 alleles, supporting their potential role as substrates for host PADI4-mediated citrullination and contributors to RA-relevant immune responses.

Risk allele–biased antigen presentation is associated with peptide-level and physicochemical features

To further investigate the underlying basis of risk allele–biased presentation, we analyzed peptide-level features of the identified OMV-derived proteins. Among the five candidate proteins identified, we selected three representative proteins (B2RHG4, OMP41, and Q7MTV9) exhibiting the highest number of peptides presented by risk alleles and the strongest binding affinities for subsequent analysis of antigen presentation patterns.Heatmap analysis revealed that peptide presentation is not uniformly distributed across HLA alleles but instead exhibits a strongly skewed repertoire, with distinct subsets of core peptides selectively enriched in RA-associated alleles. This selective enrichment is not merely quantitative but reflects a qualitative filtering process, whereby risk alleles preferentially capture a specific subset of peptides that are largely absent or weakly presented by protective alleles (Figure 8A). Consistent with this observation, binding affinity distributions revealed that risk-associated alleles are enriched for high-affinity binders, forming a distinct binding landscape characterized by a concentration of top-ranked peptides. In contrast, protective alleles display a broader and more diffuse affinity distribution, suggesting reduced selectivity and weaker peptide stabilization (Figure 8B).

Figure 8.

A two panel diagram shows a heatmap and dot plot in Panel A, and a scatter plot in Panel B, comparing peptide data. The two panel diagram presents peptide data. Panel A is a combined heatmap and dot plot. The heatmap has rows for UniProt IDs and core peptides, and columns for four DBR1 alleles: 04 01, 04 04, 13 01, and 13 02. Heatmap cells show varying brightness, with a scale from 0 to 2. To the right, a dot plot shows counts for each peptide, ranging from 0 to over 40. A legend identifies five UniProt IDs: B2RHG4, B2RM93, F5X8K0, OMP41, and Q7MTV9. Panel B is a scatter plot showing the distribution of Rank percentage for the same five UniProt IDs on the horizontal axis. The vertical axis ranges from 0.00 to 1.00. Each UniProt ID has a vertical column of data points. B2RM93 has points clustered below 0.25 and spread up to 1.00. F5X8K0 has points clustered below 0.25 and spread up to 1.00. B2RHG4 has a dense cluster between 0.00 and 0.50, with points spread up to 1.00. OMP41 has points spread across the entire range, with some clustering below 0.50. Q7MTV9 has points spread across the entire range, with some clustering below 0.50.

Risk allele–biased antigen presentation is associated with distinct peptide composition in OMV-derived proteins. (A) Allele-specific antigen presentation profiles of core peptides derived from candidate OMV proteins. Heatmap showing the predicted binding affinity (rank score) of representative core peptides across HLA-DRB1 alleles. Risk-associated alleles (DRB1*04:01 and 04:04) exhibit preferential presentation of specific peptide subsets. The accompanying dot plot summarizes the frequency (count) of peptide presentation events restricted to risk-associated alleles, highlighting differences in presentation breadth among OMV-derived antigens. (B) Distribution of binding affinities for OMV-derived peptides under risk-associated alleles. Scatter plot showing the rank (%) distribution of predicted peptide–HLA binding for each candidate protein under risk allele conditions.

To explore whether these differences are associated with intrinsic peptide properties, we performed amino acid composition analysis of presented core peptides. Amino acid composition analysis demonstrated that peptides preferentially presented by risk alleles share a conserved physicochemical profile, characterized by enrichment in hydrophobic and polar residues. Notably, this compositional pattern was not restricted to bacterial peptides but closely mirrored that observed in host-derived antigens (Figure 9A). Strikingly, comparative analysis between bacterial OMV-derived peptides and host-derived peptides revealed a high degree of physicochemical convergence across multiple residue classes. This convergence suggests that microbial peptides may inherently satisfy the structural and binding requirements favored by RA-associated HLA alleles, effectively mimicking host antigen properties at a physicochemical level rather than through strict sequence homology (Figure 9B,C).

Figure 9.

A three panel figure shows a heatmap and two bar graphs comparing amino acid composition of bacterial and host core peptides. The three panel figure displays amino acid composition data. Panel A is a heatmap with rows for individual amino acids grouped by category: Hydrophobic, Positive basic, Aromatic, Polar uncharged, Negative acidic, and Special. Columns represent peptide sources: Core peptide Bacterial EV, Core peptide Host, Host proteins alpha Enolase, Calreticulin, Vimentin, and Bacterial OMV proteins Q7MTV9, OMP41, B2RHG4. A legend indicates percentage composition from 0 percent to 15 percent. Panel B is a bar graph showing percentage composition for six amino acid categories across four bacterial sources: Core peptide Bacterial OMV, Q7MTV9, OMP41, and B2RHG4. Hydrophobic residues are highest, around 33 to 35 percent, followed by Polar uncharged, around 15 to 24 percent. Positive basic, Aromatic, Negative acidic, and Special residues are lower, generally between 7 and 15 percent. Panel C is a bar graph showing percentage composition for the same six categories across four host sources: Core peptide Host, alpha Enolase, Calreticulin, and Vimentin. Hydrophobic residues are highest, around 24 to 35 percent, followed by Polar uncharged, around 16 to 21 percent. Positive basic, Aromatic, Negative acidic, and Special residues are lower, generally between 5 and 20 percent. Both bar graphs show similar overall trends with Hydrophobic residues being most abundant.

Amino acid composition and physicochemical profiles of core peptides derived from bacterial OMV proteins and host proteins. (A) Amino acid composition profiles of core peptides derived from bacterial OMV proteins and host proteins. Heatmap illustrating the percentage composition of amino acid categories (hydrophobic, positively charged, aromatic, polar uncharged, negatively charged, and special residues) in core peptides. (B) Amino acid composition of core peptides derived from bacterial OMV proteins. (C) Amino acid composition of core peptides derived from host proteins.Bar plots showing the amino acid distribution of host-derived peptides.

These results suggest that risk-associated HLA-DRB1 alleles do not merely recognize specific peptide sequences but instead impose a selective pressure favoring peptides with defined physicochemical characteristics. Importantly, the observed convergence between bacterial OMV-derived peptides and host-derived peptides indicates that microbial antigens may intrinsically mimic host-like binding properties.

Such physicochemical mimicry provides a potential physicochemical basis for cross-recognition, whereby peptides derived from P. gingivalis proteins—particularly following host PADI4-mediated citrullination—may display HLA-binding characteristics that partially resemble those of selected self-antigens. This convergence may facilitate the breakdown of immune tolerance and promote aberrant immune activation in RA.

Discussion

In this study, we developed a systematic computational framework to identify microbial antigens with preferential presentation by RA-associated HLA-DRB1 alleles and applied it to P. gingivalis OMV proteins. The association between P. gingivalis, protein citrullination, and RA has been extensively investigated, and our study does not seek to redefine this established biological relationship. Instead, the novelty of the present work lies in introducing antigen presentation as an additional computational selection layer that integrates microbial protein exposure with RA-associated HLA genetics. By integrating multiple complementary criteria—including global risk enrichment, high-affinity binding bias, and allelic presentation ratio signatures—we prioritized a small subset of candidate proteins exhibiting convergent risk allele–biased presentation patterns. Notably, the identification of gingipain R1 among the final candidate proteins provides additional support for the biological relevance of our computational framework. Gingipains have been extensively implicated in RA-associated mechanisms, including the processing of host proteins such as fibrinogen and α-enolase and the generation of immunogenic neo-epitopes [33]. The fact that our unbiased screening strategy independently prioritized gingipain R1 suggests that the framework is capable of capturing functionally relevant antigens rather than arbitrary candidates. While this observation does not constitute direct validation, it provides an important layer of external consistency, indicating that the identified selection criteria may reflect biologically meaningful features associated with RA-related antigen presentation. This concordance between computational prediction and prior experimental observations strengthens confidence in the utility of the framework for prioritizing candidate microbial antigens.

The prioritization of RgpA is particularly informative in light of the substantial experimental and clinical literature linking gingipains to RA. Gingipains are among the major virulence factors associated with P. gingivalis and its OMVs and have traditionally been considered functionally coupled with PPAD-mediated citrullination. By cleaving proteins at arginine residues, arginine-specific gingipains can generate substrates that subsequently undergo PPAD-mediated citrullination, thereby facilitating the production of potentially immunogenic modified peptides. Importantly, the relevance of gingipains extends beyond this biochemical interaction. Humoral responses against P. gingivalis gingipains have been detected in RA cohorts and, notably, elevated anti-RgpB antibodies have been observed years before the onset of clinical RA symptoms. Moreover, combined antibody responses against RgpA and PPAD have been proposed as serological indicators associated with RA. These observations provide an important clinical context for our computational finding: RgpA was prioritized not because gingipains were predefined as RA-related proteins, but because its predicted peptide repertoire independently satisfied the HLA-dependent selection criteria established in our analysis. This convergence between computational prioritization and previous biochemical and patient-based observations supports the biological plausibility of the screening framework [12,27,33–35].

A key finding of this study is that risk-associated HLA-DRB1 alleles do not merely recognize specific peptide sequences but appear to preferentially present peptides sharing defined physicochemical characteristics. The observed convergence between bacterial OMV-derived peptides and host-derived peptides suggests that antigenicity in RA may be driven by physicochemical compatibility with HLA binding preferences rather than strict sequence identity. This provides a plausible basis for molecular mimicry, whereby microbial peptides can be presented in a host-like manner and potentially contribute to the breakdown of immune tolerance.

Building on these observations, we propose a conceptual model in which host PADI4-mediated citrullination acts as a critical modifier of microbial antigenicity. n this model, P. gingivalis releases OMVs containing diverse protein cargo that can disseminate beyond the periodontal niche and interact with host immune cells. Upon uptake by antigen-presenting cells, these microbial proteins become substrates for host PADI4, leading to the conversion of arginine residues into citrulline and the generation of modified peptides with altered binding properties.

Importantly, our results suggest that these citrullinated peptides are not randomly presented but instead preferentially fit the binding landscape of RA-associated HLA-DRB1 risk alleles. This selective presentation may amplify the visibility of microbial-derived neoantigens within the adaptive immune system. As a consequence, peptides derived from P. gingivalis proteins may be recognized in a manner analogous to self-antigens, promoting activation of autoreactive CD4⁺ T cells and driving downstream inflammatory responses.Taken together, this model provides a mechanistic framework linking microbial exposure, host enzymatic modification, and HLA-restricted antigen presentation. Rather than acting solely through pathogen-derived enzymes such as PPAD, P. gingivalis may contribute to RA pathogenesis through a host-driven pathway in which PADI4 reshapes microbial antigenicity to favor autoimmune recognition. In this model, P. gingivalis-derived proteins—particularly those disseminated via OMVs—may serve as substrates for host PADI4, leading to the generation of citrullinated peptides that preferentially fit the binding landscape of RA-associated HLA alleles. In contrast to the traditional PPAD-centric view, this framework highlights a complementary pathway in which host-driven modification of microbial proteins contributes to disease-relevant antigen presentation. Such a mechanism may help explain why PPAD deficiency alone does not fully abolish the pro-arthritogenic effects of P. gingivalis [19].

This study has several limitations. First, our analysis is based on computational prediction of antigen presentation and does not directly demonstrate in vivo processing, citrullination, or T cell recognition of the identified peptides. Second, the precise citrullination sites on microbial proteins remain unresolved, and our framework infers PADI4 susceptibility based on presentation patterns rather than direct biochemical evidence. Third, our analysis focuses specifically on the PADI4 pathway and does not account for the potential contributions of other peptidylarginine deiminases or alternative post-translational modification systems that may also influence antigenicity.

Despite these limitations, our work provides a generalizable framework for systematically linking host-driven post-translational modification to microbial antigen presentation. This approach can be extended to other microbial species, including bacteria and viruses, as well as to other immune-mediated diseases beyond RA. More broadly, our findings suggest that the interaction between host modification enzymes and microbial proteins may represent an underappreciated axis in shaping disease-associated antigen landscapes.

Future studies combining experimental validation, site-specific citrullination mapping, and immunological assays will be essential to further test this model. In particular, integrating mass spectrometry–based citrullinome profiling with HLA peptidomics and T cell activation assays may help determine whether the predicted peptides indeed function as immunogenic epitopes in vivo.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study establishes an integrative computational framework for prioritizing P. gingivalis OMV-derived proteins according to their predicted compatibility with RA-associated HLA antigen presentation. Application of three complementary selection criteria—global risk allele enrichment, high-affinity risk bias, and allelic presentation ratio signatures—identified five candidate microbial proteins, including RgpA and four outer membrane-associated proteins. The independent identification of RgpA, a virulence factor already supported by biochemical and patient-based evidence in RA, provides external biological consistency for the screening strategy. Rather than proposing a new association between P. gingivalis and RA, our findings refine the existing model by suggesting that host-driven modification and HLA-dependent selection may determine which microbial proteins are most likely to acquire immunological relevance. These candidates now provide a focused set of targets for experimental validation by site-specific citrullination analysis, HLA peptidomics, ACPA recognition, and T-cell activation assays.

Methods

Study design

This study was designed as a computational, hypothesis-driven analysis to investigate whether host PADI4-mediated citrullination of P. gingivalis–derived proteins could contribute to RA-associated antigen presentation. The overall workflow consisted of three major steps. First, reference human proteins with known susceptibility to PADI4- and/or PPAD-mediated citrullination were curated and categorized to establish a baseline for antigen presentation patterns. Second, MHC-II antigen presentation profiles were predicted for these reference proteins across RA-associated and protective HLA-DRB1 alleles, and key presentation features were systematically derived. Third, these features were applied as screening criteria to P. gingivalis OMV proteomic datasets to prioritize candidate microbial proteins with risk allele–biased presentation patterns and potential susceptibility to host PADI4-mediated modification.

All analyses were performed in silico using publicly available datasets and prediction tools, and no experimental validation was conducted in this study.

MHC-II antigen presentation prediction

Epitope presentation was assessed using the IEDB Analysis Resource (https://tools.iedb.org/mhcii/, accessed April 10th, 2026). Prediction Method: NetMHCIIpan 4.1 EL(recommended epitope predictor-2023.09). Peptide length: 12-18 mer sliding window. Analysis: MHC-II binding prediction. Classification: Peptides with Rank ≤ 1% were designated strong binders. Alleles evaluated included RA risk-associated and RA-protective MHC-II variants, based on genetic epidemiology literature [36].

Comparative visualization of peptide–HLA binding distributions and peptide–HLA interaction maps

To provide a systems-level view of peptide–HLA binding patterns, predicted MHC-II binding ranks were summarized and visualized in two complementary formats. First, for risk-associated HLA alleles, all predicted peptide binders derived from the candidate microbial proteins were grouped by source protein and visualized according to binding rank (%) distribution. Lower rank values indicate stronger predicted binding. These data were plotted as point-based distribution charts to compare the range and density of predicted binders across proteins and alleles.

Second, peptide–HLA interaction maps were generated separately for risk-associated and protective HLA alleles. In this analysis, only peptide–allele pairs with predicted binding rank ≤ 1 were retained in order to focus on the strongest predicted interactions. When multiple binding predictions were present for the same peptide–allele pair, the minimum rank value was retained as the representative score. For visualization, rank values were transformed as −log10 (rank), such that higher values indicate stronger predicted binding. The resulting peptide–HLA matrices were rendered as heatmaps.

All visual summaries were prepared using Microsoft Excel (Version 16.107). Distribution plots were generated from Excel-based data summaries and further arranged graphically in Microsoft PowerPoint (Version 16.107). Heatmaps were generated directly in Excel using the transformed −log10(rank) values.

Computational and statistical analysis

All analyses were descriptive and computational, performed using Python-based pipelines. Results represent in silico predictions and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. For the comparisons shown in Figure 3 C, unpaired two-tailed Student's t-tests were performed to compare the predicted presentation proportions between individual HLA-DRB1 alleles. Specifically, comparisons were conducted between HLA-DRB1*04:01 and HLA-DRB1*13:01, HLA-DRB1*04:01 and HLA-DRB1*13:02, HLA-DRB1*04:04 and HLA-DRB1*13:01, and HLA-DRB1*04:04 and HLA-DRB1*13:02. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All other analyses were descriptive and intended for hypothesis generation.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (grant number 25K23670). The funders had no role in the review design, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation. This work was supported by publication funding from the Tohoku University APC Support Program (APC Kakudai)

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (grant number 25K23670). The funders had no role in the review design, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation. This work was supported by publication funding from the Tohoku University APC Support Program (APC Kakudai).

X.C. and W.G. conceived and designed the study. W.G. developed the overall study framework. X.C. and W.G. performed the analysis and wrote the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. The Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicle (OMV) proteomic dataset used in this study was obtained from previously published publicly available data [31]. Additional data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Use of generative AI tools

Graphic abstract, Figures 1 and 4 were initially drafted with the assistance of ChatGPT Plus version (OpenAI, accessed in 2026) as a generative design tool. The authors subsequently modified, curated, and finalized all figure content to ensure scientific accuracy and consistency with the study.

References

  • [1]. Steiner G, Toes REM. Autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis - rheumatoid factor, anticitrullinated protein antibodies and beyond. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2024;36(3):217–224. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000001006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2]. György B, Tóth E, Tarcsa E, et al. Citrullination: a posttranslational modification in health and disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;38(10):1662–1677. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3]. Ikari K, Kuwahara M, Nakamura T, et al. Association between PADI4 and rheumatoid arthritis: a replication study. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(10):3054–3057. doi: 10.1002/art.21309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4]. Fan LY, He DY, Wang Q, et al. Citrullinated vimentin stimulates proliferation, pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion, and PADI4 and RANKL expression of fibroblast-like synoviocytes in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2012;41(5):354–358. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2012.670263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5]. Wu X, Wang Y, Wang W. The role of peptidyl arginine deiminase IV(PADI4) in cancers. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2023;23(3):256–265. doi: 10.2174/1871520622666220614115309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6]. Alghamdi M, Al Ghamdi KA, Khan RH, et al. An interplay of structure and intrinsic disorder in the functionality of peptidylarginine deiminases, a family of key autoimmunity-related enzymes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019;76(23):4635–4662. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03237-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7]. Van Steendam K, Tilleman K, Deforce D. The relevance of citrullinated vimentin in the production of antibodies against citrullinated proteins and the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(5):830–837. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8]. Kinloch A, Tatzer V, Wait R, et al. Identification of citrullinated alpha-enolase as a candidate autoantigen in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7(6):R1421–R1429. doi: 10.1186/ar1845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9]. Ling S, Cline EN, Haug TS, et al. Citrullinated calreticulin potentiates rheumatoid arthritis shared epitope signaling. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(3):618–626. doi: 10.1002/art.37814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10]. Gabarrini G, Chlebowicz MA, Vega Quiroz ME, et al. Conserved citrullinating exoenzymes in porphyromonas species. J Dent Res. 2018;97(5):556–562. doi: 10.1177/0022034517747575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11]. Castellar-Mendoza C, Castillo DM, Chila-Moreno L, et al. Porphyromonas gulae and PPAD antibodies are not related to citrullination in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(7):3509–3519. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04964-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12]. Wegner N, Wait R, Sroka A, et al. Peptidylarginine deiminase from Porphyromonas gingivalis citrullinates human fibrinogen and α-enolase: implications for autoimmunity in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(9):2662–2672. doi: 10.1002/art.27552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13]. Konig MF, Bingham CO 3rd, Andrade F. PPAD is not targeted as a citrullinated protein in rheumatoid arthritis, but remains a candidate for inducing autoimmunity. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(1):e8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14]. Jenning M, Marklein B, Ytterberg J, et al. Bacterial citrullinated epitopes generated by porphyromonas gingivalis infection-a missing link for ACPA production. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(9):1194–1202. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15]. Hamamoto Y, Ouhara K, Munenaga S, et al. Effect of Porphyromonas gingivalis infection on gut dysbiosis and resultant arthritis exacerbation in mouse model. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020;22(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02348-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16]. Seri Y, Shoda H, Suzuki A, et al. Peptidylarginine deiminase type 4 deficiency reduced arthritis severity in a glucose-6-phosphate isomerase-induced arthritis model. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13041. doi: 10.1038/srep13041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17]. Chapple ILC, Mealey BL, Van Dyke TE, et al. Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S74–S84. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18]. Hajishengallis G, Darveau RP, Curtis MA. The keystone-pathogen hypothesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10(10):717–725. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19]. Rebak AS, Hendriks IA, Elsborg JD, et al. A quantitative and site-specific Atlas of the citrullinome reveals widespread existence of citrullination and insights into PADI4 substrates. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2024;31(6):977–995. doi: 10.1038/s41594-024-01214-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20]. van der Helm-van Mil AH, Verpoort KN, Breedveld FC, et al. The HLA-DRB1 shared epitope alleles are primarily a risk factor for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies and are not an independent risk factor for development of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(4):1117–1121. doi: 10.1002/art.21739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21]. Larid G, Pancarte M, Offer G, et al. In rheumatoid arthritis patients, HLA-DRB1*04:01 and rheumatoid nodules are associated with ACPA to a particular fibrin epitope. Front Immunol. 2021;12:692041. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.692041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22]. MacGregor A, Ollier W, Thomson W, et al. HLA-DRB1*0401/0404 genotype and rheumatoid arthritis: increased association in men, young age at onset, and disease severity. J Rheumatol. 1995;22(6):1032–1036. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23]. van Heemst J, Hensvold AH, Jiang X, et al. Protective effect of HLA-DRB1*13 alleles during specific phases in the development of ACPA-positive RA. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(10):1891–1898. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24]. Oka S, Furukawa H, Kawasaki A, et al. Protective effect of the HLA-DRB1*13:02 allele in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25]. Bettencourt A, Carvalho C, Leal B, et al. The protective role of HLA-DRB1(∗)13 in autoimmune diseases. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:948723. doi: 10.1155/2015/948723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26]. Magaña G, Harvey C, Taggart CC, et al. Bacterial outer membrane vesicles: role in pathogenesis and host-cell interactions. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023;13(1):32. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13010032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27]. Mantri CK, Chen CH, Dong X, et al. Fimbriae-mediated outer membrane vesicle production and invasion of Porphyromonas gingivalis . Microbiologyopen. 2015;4(1):53–65. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28]. Camps J, Erdos MR, Ried T. The role of lamin B1 for the maintenance of nuclear structure and function. Nucleus. 2015;6(1):8–14. doi: 10.1080/19491034.2014.1003510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29]. Piccus R, Brayson D. The nuclear envelope: LINCing tissue mechanics to genome regulation in cardiac and skeletal muscle. Biol Lett. 2020;16(7):20200302. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30]. Hao W, Chen Z, Tang J, et al. hnRNPA2B1 promotes the occurrence and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma by downregulating PCK1 mRNA via a m6A RNA methylation manner. J Transl Med. 2023;21(1):861. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04704-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31]. Stobernack T, Glasner C, Junker S, et al. Extracellular proteome and citrullinome of the oral pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis . J Proteome Res. 2016;15(12):4532–4543. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32]. Johansson L, Sherina N, Kharlamova N, et al. Concentration of antibodies against Porphyromonas gingivalis is increased before the onset of symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1100-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33]. Ahmadi P, Mahmoudi M, Kheder RK, et al. Impacts of Porphyromonas gingivalis periodontitis on rheumatoid arthritis autoimmunity. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;118:109936. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.109936 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34]. Castillo DM, Lafaurie GI, Romero-Sánchez C, et al. The interaction effect of Anti-RgpA and Anti-PPAD antibody titers: an indicator for rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis. J Clin Med. 2023;12(8):3027. doi: 10.3390/jcm12083027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35]. Quirke AM, Lugli EB, Wegner N, et al. Heightened immune response to autocitrullinated Porphyromonas gingivalis peptidylarginine deiminase: a potential mechanism for breaching immunologic tolerance in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(1):263–269. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36]. Gong W. Computational identification of amyloid-mimicking microbial peptides with predicted MHC-II presentation relevance to alzheimer’s disease. NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2026;797. doi: 10.1038/s41540-026-00797-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. The Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicle (OMV) proteomic dataset used in this study was obtained from previously published publicly available data [31]. Additional data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Journal of Oral Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES