ABSTRACT
This case series describes three midline odontogenic keratocysts (OKCs) and reviews the associated literature. All three patients were male; two lesions were maxillary. All lesions were surgically excised, with no recurrence. A search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus identified 33 reported cases of midline OKC, including this series. Of these, 64% (21/33) were male, and age ranged from 6 to 80 years (mean 39.8 ± 20.3). The mandible was affected in 67% (22/33). Excision was the predominant treatment (94%, 31/33), with adjunctive cauterization in 30% (10/33) and decompression in 15% (5/33). Among cases with available follow‐up, one recurrence was reported. OKC should be considered in the differential diagnosis of midline jaw lesions, supported by combined clinical, radiographic, and histopathological assessment.
Keywords: cysts of the jaws, differential diagnosis, keratocyst, odontogenic cysts
Key Clinical Message
Odontogenic keratocysts can occur in the anterior jaws and be associated with teeth roots, and are an important differential diagnosis for other intraosseous conditions.
1. Introduction
The odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) is an odontogenic cyst characterized by a stratified squamous parakeratinized epithelial lining and a locally infiltrative growth pattern with a marked tendency toward recurrence [1]. It is most commonly diagnosed between the second and fourth decades of life, with a slight male predominance and a predilection for the posterior mandible [1]. OKC is uncommon in the anterior region of the jaws [2].
When OKCs arise outside their typical location, particularly in the midline, their clinical and radiographic presentation may closely mimic a radicular cyst [3, 4, 5, 6], nasopalatine duct cyst [7], and residual cyst [2]. Such presentations remain sparsely documented in the literature and are often reported as isolated cases, limiting comprehensive understanding of their behavior and diagnostic implications.
This study reports three cases of midline OKC, defined as an OKC centered on the anatomical midline or extending across it, involving both sides of the maxilla or mandible. These cases pose diagnostic challenges due to their uncommon clinical and radiographic characteristics.
2. Case History
2.1. Case Report 1
A 54‐year‐old Caucasian man presented with anterior maxillary swelling. Upon physical examination, symmetrical normochromic swelling was observed in the vestibular fornix associated with the apical region of teeth #8 and #9.
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) revealed a unilocular hypodense area associated with the roots of central maxillary incisors. The alveolar cortical bone was disrupted, and the dental apex was resorbed. Nasopalatine duct communication and vestibular cortical discontinuity were also observed (Figure 1a–c).
FIGURE 1.

(a–c) Cone beam computed tomography of the anterior maxilla (coronal, sagittal, and axial sections) showing discontinuity of the vestibular cortical bone, communication with the nasopalatine duct, and disruption of the lamina dura. (d) Fine‐needle aspiration revealing yellowish‐white viscous content with blood in the syringe. (e, f) Histological sections demonstrating a thin stratified squamous epithelial lining with corrugated parakeratin and a palisaded basal layer with flattened epithelial ridges. The lamina propria consists of fibrous connective tissue with fibroblasts and sparse mononuclear inflammatory cells (×200 and ×400, hematoxylin and eosin).
Teeth #8 and #9 were nonvital and underwent endodontic treatment. However, no remission of the periapical lesion was observed. Fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) revealed a yellowish‐white viscous fluid with blood (Figure 1d). The lesion was surgically enucleated with curettage.
Microscopically, a cystic cavity lined by a thin parakeratinized stratified squamous epithelium was observed, with surface corrugation and a basal layer of palisaded cells. Additionally, the cyst wall exhibited a fibrous capsule containing epithelial islands, along with a mild inflammatory infiltrate (Figure 1e,f). The final diagnosis of an OKC was made. The patient is under follow‐up for 29 months without signs of recurrence.
2.2. Case Report 2
A 57‐year‐old male patient was referred for evaluation of a maxillary periapical radiolucent image identified in a routine radiographic exam. CBCT revealed a well‐defined, unilocular, hypodense image, located in the midline, between the roots of the maxillary central incisors, which were endodontically treated (Figure 2). The lesion caused displacement of the roots (Figure 2a), expansion of the palatine cortical plate, and discontinuity of the buccal cortical plate were also observed (Figure 2b,c). The patient reported no associated symptoms. Based on the diagnostic hypotheses of nasopalatine duct cyst and radicular cyst, surgical enucleation with curettage was performed. Histopathological analysis showed the same features observed in Case 1. Thus, the diagnosis of OKC was established (Figure 2d,e). After 2 years of treatment, no imaging signs of recurrence were observed.
FIGURE 2.

(a) Panoramic radiograph showing a well‐circumscribed radiolucent lesion displacing the roots of teeth #8 and #9. (b–c) Axial cone beam computed tomography demonstrating a well‐defined hypodense lesion between the maxillary central incisors with cortical expansion and focal perforation; panel b shows communication with the nasopalatine duct (CNP). (d) Histologic section showing a cystic lesion with luminal keratin, epithelial lining, and a vascularized connective tissue capsule (×50). (e) Higher magnification revealing thin stratified squamous epithelium with corrugated parakeratin and a palisaded basal layer (×200, hematoxylin and eosin).
2.3. Case Report 3
A 36‐year‐old man presented mobility and pressure sensation in teeth #24 and #25. Clinical examination confirmed the increased mobility in teeth #24 and #25, with a painless firm swelling on the mandibular anterior lingual surface. Thermal pulp sensitivity tests were positive in both teeth. Panoramic radiograph and CBCT showed a well‐defined unilocular midline mandibular lesion between the central incisors, causing root displacement and cortical resorption, with thin, mildly expanded buccal and lingual plates (Figure 3a–c). Based on the diagnostic hypotheses of a lateral periodontal cyst and OKC, surgical enucleation was performed, followed by peripheral costectomy. Histopathological analysis revealed the same features observed in Cases 1 and 2 (Figure 3d,e), confirming the diagnosis of OKC. No clinical or imaging signs of recurrence were observed 8 years after treatment.
FIGURE 3.

(a) Panoramic radiograph demonstrating a well‐circumscribed radiolucent lesion between the roots of teeth #24 and #25 with root displacement. (b, c) Axial cone beam computed tomography showing a hypodense lesion with anteroposterior cortical expansion. (d) Low‐power histologic view of a cystic lesion with fibrous capsule, epithelial lining, and luminal content (×20). (e) Higher magnification showing stratified squamous epithelium with corrugated parakeratin and palisaded hyperchromatic basal cells; the connective tissue capsule contains fibroblasts and capillaries (×400, hematoxylin and eosin).
3. Methods
3.1. Patient Consent
All 3 patients presented in this case series provided informed written consent for the use of clinical images, information, and biological material for research and publication purposes.
3.2. Literature Review
A literature search was performed in November 2025 for midline OKC in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using the following strategy: (“Odontogenic Cyst” OR “Odontogenic Cysts” OR Odontogenic‐Cyst OR Odontogenic‐Cysts OR Keratocyst OR Keratocysts OR Keratocystic OR “Keratocystic Odontogenic Tumor” OR “Keratocystic Odontogenic Tumors” OR “Odontogenic Keratocyst” OR “Odontogenic Keratocysts”) AND ((mandible OR mandibular OR mandibula) AND (anterior OR symphysis OR symphyseal OR “incisor region” OR chin) OR (maxilla OR maxillary OR maxillar) AND (anterior OR “incisor region” OR “alveolar process” OR alveolar)).
Only case reports describing anterior OKCs centered on the anatomical midline or extending across it and involving both sides of the maxilla or mandible, with available epidemiological information were included in the review. The search was filtered by article type for case reports, reviews, and systematic reviews without language or publication date restriction.
A total of 1152 records were identified: PubMed (n = 346), Embase (n = 321), and Scopus (n = 485). After title and abstract screening, 64 records underwent full‐text assessment. Of these, 16 duplicates, 15 ineligible studies, and 4 studies with unavailable full texts were excluded (Figure 4). A total of 29 studies remained eligible. One study reported 2 cases, resulting in 30 cases; together with the three additional cases from this series, 33 cases are presented in Table 1.
FIGURE 4.

Literature review flowchart of included and excluded studies.
TABLE 1.
Cases of midline odontogenic keratocysts published in the reviewed literature, including the current cases.
| Article | Gender | Age (years) | Site | Treatment | Follow‐up (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | M | 54 | Maxilla | Excision with curettage | 29 |
| Case 2 | M | 57 | Maxilla | Excision | 24 |
| Case 3 | M | 36 | Mandible | Excision with peripheral ostectomy | 96 |
| Hayashi et al., 2025 [27] | M | 73 | Mandible | Excision | 0 |
| Khruomo et al., 2025 [8] | M | 22 | Mandible | Excision with peripheral ostectomy and chemical cauterization | 22 |
| Ma et al., 2025 [9] | F | 21 | Mandible | Excision with curettage | 66 |
| Ravi et al., 2025 [10] | M | 70 | Mandible | Excision | 12 |
| Suhaim et al., 2025 [11] | M | 31 | Mandible | Decompression | 84 |
| Upadhyaya et al., 2025 [12] | F | 14 | Mandible | Excision | 6 |
| Pirade et al., 2022 [21] | F | 36 | Maxilla | Maxillectomy | 12 |
| Grover et al., 2024 [25] | M | 37 | Mandible | Excision | Na |
| Singh et al., 2024 [13] | M | 42 | Maxilla | Excision with chemical cauterization | 12 |
| Barrow et al., 2024 [14] | F | 14 | Mandible | Excision | 3 |
| Nelke et al., 2023 [15] | M | 62 | Mandible | Excision | 48 |
| Chaves et al., 2021 [28] | M | 33 | Mandible | Excision | Na |
| Lunawat et al., 2020 [2] | M | 80 | Maxilla | Excision with electrical cauterization | 3 |
| Menon et al., 2020 [5] | M | 36 | Mandible | Excision with curettage and chemical cauterization | 18 |
| Prashanth et al., 2020 [6] | M | 29 | Mandible | Excision with chemical cauterization | 18 |
| Rodrigues et al., 2020 [26] | F | 63 | Mandible | Excision | 0 |
| Zamare et al., 2020 [24] | F | 24 | Maxilla and Mandible | Excision and peripheral ostectomy | 1 |
| Khan et al., 2019 [29] | F | 35 | Mandible | Decompression followed by excision with chemical cauterization | 120 |
| Medawela et al., 2017 [16] | F | 50 | Mandible | Excision | 18 |
| Satappa et al., 2017 [4] | M | 45 | Maxilla | Excision with curettage and chemical cauterization | Na |
| Gurugubelli et al., 2016 [17] | F | 60 | Mandible | Excision and oncologic treatment | Na |
| Garde et al., 2012 [23] | M | 25 | Mandible | Decompression followed by excision with curettage and chemical cauterization | 36 |
| Rajkumar et al., 2011 [18] | F | 11 | Mandible | Excision | 9 |
| Thamizhchelvan et al., 2011 [22] | F | 27 | Maxilla | Excision with chemical cauterization | Na |
| Veena et al., 2011 [3] | M | 25 | Mandible | Excision | 18 |
| Basile et al., 2010 [19] | M | 44 | Mandible | Decompression and excision | Na |
| Sulabha et al., 2013 [30] | F | 11 | Mandible | Excision with chemical cauterization | 12 |
| Chiang et al., 2006 [7] | M | 6 | Maxilla | Transnasal endoscopic decompression | Na |
| Woo et al., 1987 [20] | M | 66 | Maxilla | Excision | Na |
| M | 75 | Maxilla | Excision | Na |
Abbreviations: F, female; M, male; Na, information not available.
4. Results
Among the 33 reported cases of midline OKC, including the present series, most patients were male (21/33; 64%). Patient age ranged from 6 to 80 years (mean, 39.8 ± 20.3 years), indicating a broad demographic distribution. Cases 1 and 2 involved the maxilla, highlighting the unusual nature of this case series, given that most midline OKC reported in the literature affected the mandible (22/33; 67%). Surgical excision predominated as the treatment modality (31/33; 94%), with adjunct chemical or electrical cauterization in 30% (10/33) of cases, and decompression was performed in advanced lesions, comprising 15% (5/33) of all cases. Follow‐up was reported in 24 cases (73%), ranging from 1 to 120 months (median 18), with only 4 (12%) followed for 60 months or more [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30]. Recurrence was documented in one case, with a 66‐month follow‐up [9].
5. Discussion
As a locally infiltrative condition, OKC usually grows along medullary spaces, causing bulging of the buccal cortical plate, as presented in Case 3, without dental root resorption, communication with adjacent structures, or cortical perforation [10, 18, 30]. Although cortical perforation and infiltrative growth are not exclusive to OKC, their presence in an unusual anatomical location, as observed in Cases 1 and 2, deviates from these patterns reported in the literature [6, 30], leading to the hypothesis of a radicular cyst or nasopalatine duct cyst.
Beyond the radiographic and cortical findings, in most cases, OKC does not result in pulp vitality loss [19, 20]. However, when located in the periapex, it can lead to pulp necrosis by compromising the blood supply [31]. Among the analyzed reports, 5 (15%) cases exhibited loss of tooth vitality associated with an OKC located in the periapical region [3, 4, 5, 8].
Histopathological examination is mandatory for definitive diagnosis, particularly in atypical presentations. The microscopic features of an OKC were confirmed in all cases; additionally, the presence of satellite cysts within the cyst wall was identified, a finding that is associated with clinically aggressive behavior and an increased risk of recurrence [1, 9]. Moreover, the locally infiltrative growth pattern of these lesions adds complexity to clinical management, particularly when lesions are located near critical facial structures [7].
Surgical excision with peripheral ostectomy, or marsupialization followed by enucleation, is the standard treatment of OKCs [32]. Although chemical cauterization has been proposed after a surgical procedure, it was not performed in our cases due to the risk of paresthesia and wound dehiscence. Where cortical discontinuity placed the cyst capsule in direct contact with soft tissue, careful dissection ensured complete enucleation. All cases were treated by surgical enucleation. In Cases 1 and 2, the involved teeth had been endodontically treated prior to the OKC diagnosis.
Midline OKC is rare but clinically significant, and can present with cortical perforation and pulp vitality loss, increasing misdiagnosis risk. This case series highlights the midline location of the OKC, with cortical perforation in all three cases and dental vitality loss in two. An integrated approach with clinical, radiographic, and histopathological evaluation, combined with long‐term follow‐up, remains essential for accurate diagnosis and recurrence prevention. The variable follow‐up duration and the absence of follow‐up information in several cases may limit detection and estimation of recurrence rates. Treatment frequencies are presented as descriptive findings from the published reports, without implying comparative treatment effectiveness.
Author Contributions
Isabella Souza Malta: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, formal analysis. Bruno de Albuquerque Hayasida: data curation, investigation, writing – review and editing. Ana Lia Anbinder: investigation, data curation, writing – original draft. Elaine Judite de Amorim Carvalho: investigation, data curation, writing – review and editing. Marcelo Marotta Araújo: investigation, data curation, writing – review and editing. André Caroli Rocha: writing – review and editing. Danyel Elias da Cruz Perez: conceptualization, methodology, writing – original draft, supervision. Estela Kaminagakura: supervision, writing – original draft, conceptualization, methodology.
Funding
We acknowledge the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES) for the Master's scholarship granted to Isabella Souza Malta, Funding Code 88887.209472/2025‐00.
Disclosure
Case series: This series comprises 3 new reports and 30 cases retrieved from the literature, completing a total of 33 cases.
Ethics Statement
Formal approval was obtained from the institutional Ethics Committee for this retrospective case series (CAAE: 00210826.8.0000.0077). The patients provided informed written consent for the use of clinical images, information, and biological material for research and publication purposes.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
- 1. WHO , WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Head and Neck Tumours, 5th ed. (International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2022). [Google Scholar]
- 2. Lunawat S. D., Kunte V. R., Bhoosreddy A. R., et al., “Odontogenic Keratocyst: A Rare Presentation in Anterior Maxilla,” Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons–Pakistan 30 (2020): 1226–1229, 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.11.1226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Veena K. M., Rao R., Jagadishchandra H., and Rao P. K., “Odontogenic Keratocyst Looks Can be Deceptive, Causing Endodontic Misdiagnosis,” Case Reports in Pathology 2011 (2011): 1–3, 10.1155/2011/159501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Satappa B. S., Vasant D. U., Kanitkar S., and Kamat M., “KERATOCYSTIC Odontogenic Tumor of the Maxillary Anterior Region Masquerading as A Radicular Cyst,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 10 (2017): 3, 10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i6.17513. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Menon V. D., Muthusekhar M. R., Abdul Wahab P. U., et al., “Unique Presentation of Odontogenic Keratocyst of Anterior Mandible,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 12 (2020): 4196, 10.31838/ijpr/2020.SP2.521. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Prashanth B. R., Vidhya M. S., Karale R., et al., “Is Odontogenic Keratocyst an Endodontic Enigma? A Rare Case Report of Management of Odontogenic Keratocyst in Anterior Mandible,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology 24 (2020): 10, 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_37_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Chiang Y. C., Chao P. Z., Yang T., Yang T. H., Peng B. Y., and Lee F. P., “Transnasal Endoscopic Marsupialization for a Large Midline Maxillary Odontogenic Keratocyst in a 6‐Year‐Old Child,” International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology Extra 1 (2006): 41–44, 10.1016/j.pedex.2005.12.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Khruomo A., Umathe P. G., and Khruomo V., “Mangement of Recurrent Odontogenic Keratocyst(OKC) Using 5‐Flourouracil: A Case Report,” Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 78, no. 1 (2025): 442–445, 10.1007/s12070-025-06074-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ma Y., Yang L., Zhong B., and Han J., “A Recurrent OKC Infected With Actinomyces,” BMC Oral Health 25 (2025): 1446, 10.1186/s12903-025-06748-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ravi M. B., Suresh N., Shetty S. K., Aradya A., Vinodkumar N., and Anil S., “Single‐Stage Mandibular Reconstruction With Pre‐Mounted Dental Implants in a Patient‐Specific Titanium Framework Following Odontogenic Keratocyst Resection: A Digital Innovation,” Faces 6 (2025): 672–678, 10.1177/27325016251384579. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Bin Suhaim F., Bin Turayki H., A Bin Rubaia'an M., et al., “Suhaim‐Turayki Technique for the Decompression of Odontogenic Keratocysts: A Case Series,” F1000Research 14 (2025): 504, 10.12688/f1000research.163210.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Upadhyaya J. D. and Schlott B. J., “Odontogenic Keratocyst Exhibiting Dysplastic Changes: Report of a New Case in a 14‐Year‐Old and Literature Review,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology 37 (2025): 380–384, 10.1016/j.ajoms.2024.08.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Singh A., Kasrija R., Mittal A., et al., “Odontogenic Keratocyst of the Maxilla With Fungal Sinusitis: A Rare Case,” Cureus 16, no. 8 (2024): e67038, 10.7759/cureus.67038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Barrow R., Vempaty S., and Doumpiotis D., “An Unusual Case of an Odontogenic Keratocyst Associated With an Impacted Incisor,” Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery 23 (2024): 333–336, 10.1007/s12663-023-01975-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Nelke K. H., Łuczak K., Janeczek M., et al., “Fresh–Frozen Allogenic Bone Graft Usage in Treatment of an Odontogenic Keratocyst in the Mandible,” Applied Sciences 13 (2023): 1234, 10.3390/app13031234. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Medawela R. M. S. H. B., Jayasuriya N. S. S., Ratnayake D. R. D. L., Attygalla A. M., and Siriwardena B. S. M. S., “Squamous Cell Carcinoma Arising From a Keratocystic Odontogenic Tumor: A Case Report,” Journal of Medical Case Reports 11 (2017): 335, 10.1186/s13256-017-1486-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Gurugubelli U., Tatapudi R., Manyam R., and Sinha P., “A Silent Transformation of Keratocystic Odontogenic Tumour to Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report and Review of Literature,” Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology 28 (2016): 175–179, 10.4103/0972-1363.195134. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Rajkumar G. C., Hemalatha M., Shashikala R. P., Shashikala R., and Sonal P., “Massive Keratocystic Odontogenic Tumor of Mandible: A Case Report and Review of Literature,” Indian Journal of Dental Research 22 (2011): 205–209, 10.4103/0970-9290.80000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Basile J. R., Klene C., and Lin Y.‐L., “Calcifying Odontogenic Cyst With Odontogenic Keratocyst: A Case Report and Review of the Literature,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics 109 (2010): e40–e45, 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Woo S. B., Eisenbud L., Kleiman M., and Assael N., “Odontogenic Keratocysts in the Anterior Maxilla: Report of Two Cases, One Simulating a Nasopalatine Cyst,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Oral Pathology 64 (1987): 463–465, 10.1016/0030-4220(87)90154-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Pirade Y. B., Pieter N. A. L., and Djufri N. I., “Evidence Based Case Report: Surgical Approach in Ameloblastoma With Odontogenic Keratocyst and Recurrence Rate,” NeuroQuantology 20 (2022): 1309–1315. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Thamizhchelvan H., Malathi N., Radhika T., Padmanabhan T. V., Nandakumar N., and Santhosh Kumar K., “Incidental Discovery of Odontogenic Keratocyst in an Edentulous Patient: Importance of Routine Pre‐Prosthetic Radiographic Evaluation,” Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 11 (2011): 199–201, 10.1007/s13191-011-0097-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Garde J. B., Kulkarni A. U., Dadhe D. P., and Deshmukh V. B., “Use of Decompression Tubes in the Management of Excessively Large Odontogenic Keratocyst,” BMJ Case Reports 2012 (2012): bcr1220115318, 10.1136/bcr.12.2011.5318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Zamare V. B., Bhowate R., Lohe V., et al., “Multiple Keratocyst Glimpses Falx Cerebri and Bifid Rib‐ A Case of Gorlin‐Goltz Syndrome,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 14, no. 12 (2020): ZD01, 10.7860/JCDR/2020/44920.14312. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Grover S., Hegde S., and Mascarenhas R., “Management Regulations for Odontogenic Keratocyst: A Case Report and Review of the Literature,” Journal of Medical Case Reports 18 (2024): 152, 10.1186/s13256-024-04473-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Rodrigues B. T. G., Israel M. S., de Moura K. L. M., Pinheiro G., Carlos R., and Pires F., “Peripheral Odontogenic Keratocyst: Report of Two New Cases and Review of the Literature,” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry 12 (2020): e1005–e1010, 10.4317/jced.57653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Hayashi I. and Toida M., “Peripheral Odontogenic Keratocyst Presenting as a Gingival Nodular Mass in the Anterior Mandible: A Case Report,” Cureus 17, no. 2 (2025): e79382, 10.7759/cureus.79382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Chaves F. N., Fernandes J. D. L., França S. R., et al., “Conservative Management of an Extensive Odontogenic Keratocyst in the Anterior Region of a Pediatric Patient's Jaw,” Research, Society and Development 10 (2021): e44410414303, 10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14303. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Khan A. A., Al Qahtani S., Dawasaz A. A., et al., “Management of an Extensive Odontogenic Keratocyst: A Rare Case Report With 10‐Year Follow‐Up,” Medicine 98 (2019): e17987, 10.1097/MD.0000000000017987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Sulabha A., Choudhari S., Kenchappa U., and Totad S., “Massive Keratocystic Odontogenic Tumor of Mandible Crossing the Midline in 11‐Year Child: An Unusual Case Report and Its Management,” Dent Hypotheses 4 (2013): 28, 10.4103/2155-8213.110179. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Rajaram Mohan K., Fenn S. M., Pethagounder Thangavelu R., Mj J., and Pancharethinam D., “An Unusually Large Parakeratinised Odontogenic Keratocyst in the Maxilla With Extension Into the Floor of the Maxillary Sinus,” Cureus 14, no. 1 (2022): e21002, 10.7759/cureus.21002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Al‐Moraissi E. A., Kaur A., Gomez R. S., et al., “Effectiveness of Different Treatments for Odontogenic Keratocyst: A Network Meta‐Analysis,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 52 (2023): 32–43, 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
