Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1964 Oct;174(1):109–131. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007476

The effects of stimulation of static and dynamic fusimotor fibres on the response to stretching of the primary endings of muscle spindles

A Crowe, P B C Matthews
PMCID: PMC1368929  PMID: 14228607

Full text

PDF
109

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARKER D., GIDUMAL J. L. The morphology of intrafusal muscle fibres in the cat. J Physiol. 1961 Aug;157:513–528. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. COOPER S., DANIEL P. M. MUSCLE SPINDLES IN MAN; THEIR MORPHOLOGY IN THE LUMBRICALS AND THE DEEP MUSCLES OF THE NECK. Brain. 1963 Sep;86:563–586. doi: 10.1093/brain/86.3.563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CROWE A., MATTHEWS P. B. FURTHER STUDIES OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC FUSIMOTOR FIBRES. J Physiol. 1964 Oct;174:132–151. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. ELDRED E., GRANIT R., MERTON P. A. Supraspinal control of the muscle spindles and its significance. J Physiol. 1953 Dec 29;122(3):498–523. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp005017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GRANIT R. Neuromuscular interaction in postural tone of the cat's isometric soleus muscle. J Physiol. 1958 Oct 31;143(3):387–402. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HARVEY R. J., MATTHEWS P. B. Some effects of stimulation of the muscle nerve on afferent endings of muscle spindles, and the classification of their responses into types A1 and A2. J Physiol. 1961 May;156:470–497. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HARVEY R. J., MATTHEWS P. B. The response of de-efferented muscle spindle endings in the cat's soleus to slow extension of the muscle. J Physiol. 1961 Jul;157:370–392. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. JANSEN J. K., MATTHEWS P. B. The central control of the dynamic response of muscle spindle receptors. J Physiol. 1962 May;161:357–378. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. JANSEN J. K., MATTHEWS P. B. The effects of fusimotor activity on the static responsiveness of primary and secondary endings of muscle spindles in the decerebrate cat. Acta Physiol Scand. 1962 Aug;55:376–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1962.tb02451.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. KATZ B. Action potentials from a sensory nerve ending. J Physiol. 1950 Oct 16;111(3-4):248–260. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1950.sp004478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MATTHEWS P. B. MUSCLE SPINDLES AND THEIR MOTOR CONTROL. Physiol Rev. 1964 Apr;44:219–288. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1964.44.2.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MATTHEWS P. B. THE RESPONSE OF DE-EFFERENTED MUSCLE SPINDLE RECEPTORS TO STRETCHING AT DIFFERENT VELOCITIES. J Physiol. 1963 Oct;168:660–678. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES