Abstract
Integration of neural interfaces with minimal tissue disruption in the brain is ideal to develop robust tools that can address essential neuroscience questions and combat neurological disorders. However, implantation of intracortical devices provokes severe tissue inflammation within the brain, which requires a high metabolic demand to support a complex series of cellular events mediating tissue degeneration and wound healing. Pericytes, peri-vascular cells involved in blood-brain barrier maintenance, vascular permeability, waste clearance, and angiogenesis, have recently been implicated as potential perpetuators of neurodegeneration in brain injury and disease. While the intimate relationship between pericytes and the cortical microvasculature have been explored in other disease states, their behavior following microelectrode implantation, which is responsible for direct blood vessel disruption and dysfunction, is currently unknown. Using two-photon microscopy we observed dynamic changes in the structure and function of pericytes during implantation of a microelectrode array over a 4-week implantation period. Pericytes respond to electrode insertion through transient increases in intracellular calcium and underlying constriction of capillary vessels. Within days following the initial insertion, we observed an influx of new, proliferating pericytes which contribute to new blood vessel formation. Additionally, we discovered a potentially novel population of reactive immune cells in close proximity to the electrode-tissue interface actively engaging in encapsulation of the microelectrode array. Finally, we determined that intracellular pericyte calcium can be modulated by intracortical microstimulation in an amplitude- and frequency-dependent manner. This study provides a new perspective on the complex biological sequelae occurring at the electrode-tissue interface and will foster new avenues of potential research consideration and lead to development of more advanced therapeutic interventions towards improving the biocompatibility of neural electrode technology.
Keywords: Neurovascular, Brain-computer interfaces, Blood-brain barrier, Biocompatibility, Intracortical microstimulation, Neurostimulation, Neuromodulation
1. Introduction
Advances in implantable microelectrode technology are evolving at a rapid rate, with recent electrode designs offering the capability to interface with hundreds or thousands of neurons at a time [1–4]. Recording or manipulating brain activity with high spatial and temporal resolution has revolutionized medical treatment for individuals who suffer from neurological disabilities or debilitating brain disease [5,6]. Despite this progress, there remain challenges using neural microelectrodes for long-term clinical applications due to unpredictable immune responses to an indwelling foreign body [7–12]. Investigators have spent the last three decades attempting to discern the biological origins of a gradual neurodegenerative fate surrounding chronic microelectrodes, yet efforts to identify all of the contributors to the brain’s foreign body response to implanted devices have been confounded by unexplained variability in research findings [13–15]. Realizing the potential of a fully integrated, long-lasting neural electrode interface necessitates a more in-depth understanding of this experimental variability in the foreign body response to neural microelectrode implants.
One theory of biological variability to neural microelectrodes involves the currently unknown consequence of neurovascular damage to device implantation [7]. Insertion of a large, mechanically non-compliant electrode array, often with complex, three-dimensional geometries, unavoidably results in damage to underlying vasculature. Sharp, penetrating electrodes can produce variable amounts of bleeding within the brain both near and far from the site of device implantation depending on insertion conditions, such as when implanting through larger descending blood vessels versus directly into the capillary bed [16]. Implantation of these devices can sever or rupture nearby blood vessels leading to influx of plasma proteins that are normally kept out of the brain by the blood-brain barrier [17]. The sudden influx of harmful plasma proteins into the parenchyma initiates a cascade of cellular and tissue processes involving neuroinflammation, glial activation, neurodegeneration, and potentially pericyte dysfunctions around chronically inserted microelectrodes [12,16]. Pericytes are mural cells that exist on the abluminal side of the blood-brain barrier and are responsible for various regulatory, homeostatic, and neuroimmune functions within the brain [18]. Situated between neuronal synapses and astrocytic endfeet on one side and the endothelial barrier on the other, pericytes are uniquely positioned to communicate signals between neurons and blood vessels to drive neurovascular coupling within the brain [19]. Despite their significance in supporting the metabolic and waste clearance demands of neurons within the brain, pericytes are currently severely underacknowledged in the study of neural electrode biocompatibility [11,20].
Immediately following a major insult to the brain, pericytes constrict capillary vessels, reduce blood flow, and subsequently perish [21–23]. This loss in pericyte number is followed by a resurgence of new cells which initiate angiogenesis and re-vascularize damaged tissue [24,25]. Coverage of cortical blood vessels is an important pericyte function for regulating blood-brain barrier permeability and has been linked to the neuropathology of degenerative brain diseases, such as stroke and Alzheimer’s disease [23,26]. Due to the ability to regulate vascular permeability, pericytes also contribute to the recruitment of peripheral immune cells following injury [27]. Finally, pericytes reportedly possess mesenchymal stem cell-like activity, such as differentiating into microglia-like cells during pathological conditions such as stroke [28,29]. One key molecular feature of pericytes is their expression of NG2 (neuron-glial antigen 2), also known as chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (Cspg4). NG2/Cspg4 plays a crucial role in promoting pericyte proliferation, maintaining blood-brain barrier integrity, supporting angiogenesis, and modulating immune responses [30]. Its expression is directly modulated by inflammatory cytokine release by surrounding cells, particularly under conditions of injury or neurodegeneration [31,32]. As a result, pericytes are increasingly emerging as significant perpetuators of the neurodegenerative outcomes in brain injury and disease.
Previously, we demonstrated that pericyte densities fluctuate spatiotemporally around chronically implanted microelectrodes [12]. Until now, the pericyte contribution to the foreign body response following neural probe implantation has been examined solely through the lens of post-mortem tissue sections [12,20], providing only a snapshot of the tissue response outcomes at the endpoint of the experiment. Intravital imaging is an emerging imaging technique to longitudinally visualize the morphology and activity of different cellular populations within the brain in real-time and offers a more detailed characterization of the dynamic tissue response to chronic brain implants [33–37]. Using two-photon microscopy, we observe dynamic changes of brain pericytes over a 28-day period around chronically implanted microelectrodes. Specifically, we determine that pericytes respond immediately (<30 min) to electrode insertion by constriction of microvessels, and whose Ca2+-mediated contraction can be modulated using intracortical microstimulation, followed by gradual remodeling of local vasculature over the course of days to weeks following implantation. Using dual-transgenic mouse models, we also reveal for the first-time a novel reactive immune cell population at the device-tissue interface. In summary, our work highlights a crucially understudied component of the foreign body response to intracortical electrodes and the novel findings presented here will ultimately benefit the future development of more advanced intervention strategies and innovative designs of neural implant technology.
2. Methods
2.1. Experimental animal models
Tg(Cspg4-DsRed.T1)1Akik mice (male, 22–30 g, 8–12 weeks old) expressing fluorescent DsRed protein in vascular smooth muscle cells (vSMCs) and pericytes were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Stock #008241, Bar Harbor, ME). Dual-fluorescent pericyte and microglia models were generated by crossing male Tg(Cspg4-DsRed.T1)1Akik mice and congenic female B6.129P-Cx3cr1/J mice (Cx3cr1-GFP, Stock #005582, Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME). To visualize GCaMP expression within pericytes, male B6.Cg-Tg(Pdgfrb-CreERT2)6096Rha/J mice (Pdgfrb-CreERT2, Stock #029684, Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME) were crossed with female B6J.Cg-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm96 (CAG-GCaMP6s)Hze/MwarJ mice (Ai96(RCL-GCaMP6s), Stock #028866, Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME). To induce GCaMP6s expression, PDGFRβ-GCaMP6s mice were injected intraperitoneally with tamoxifen (10 mg/mL in corn oil) at a dose of 100 mg/kg on five consecutive days six weeks prior to surgery. All procedures and experimental protocols were approved by the University of Pittsburgh, Division of Laboratory Animal Resources, and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in accordance with the standards for humane animal care as set by the Animal Welfare Act and the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
2.2. Surgical probe implantation
Probe implantation surgeries were performed as described previously [33–38]. Prior to surgery, animals were sedated using an anesthetic cocktail mixture of xylazine (7 mg/kg) and ketamine (75 mg/kg). The top of the mouse head was shaved and sterilized with alternating betadine and ethanol scrubs. A single incision was made over the mouse skull followed by removal of excess hair and connective tissue. Adhesive Vetbond was applied to the skull prior to drilling. Two bone screw holes centered over each motor cortex were drilled and fitted with bone screws. A 4 × 4 mm sized craniotomy was created over both hemispheres. A 4-shank Michigan style microelectrode array was inserted at a 30° angle to a depth of 300 μm below the surface within the right visual cortex (1.5 mm anterior, 1 mm lateral from lambda). The contralateral cortex was left un-implanted as an un-injured control region for comparison. A silicone elastomer (Kwik-sil) was used to fill the space within the craniotomy above the brain prior to covering with a glass coverslip and sealing the edges of the glass with dental cement for optical imaging. A separate cohort of C57BL/6J mice were implanted for post-mortem histological analysis as described previously [12]. Similar implantation procedures were repeated in these mice with the exception of the formation of a drill-sized craniotomy over the visual cortex (1.5 mm anterior, 1 mm lateral from lambda) in which a single shank Michigan style microelectrode array was lowered to a 1.6 mm depth into the cortex at a 90° angle. Kwik-sil was applied to fill the space within the craniotomy and around the electrode prior to sealing within a dental cement headcap. Ketofen (5 mg/kg, Covetrus, Inc., Portland, ME) was provided post-operatively on the day of surgery and up to 2 days post-surgery to all implanted animals.
2.3. Two-photon laser-scanning microscopy
Two-photon microscopy was used to track the dynamic pericyte response to chronically implanted microelectrodes. The microscope was equipped with a scan head (Bruker, Madison, WI), an OPO laser (Insight DS+; Spectra-Physics, Menlo Park, CA), non-descanned photomultiplier tubes (Hamamatsu Photonics KK, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan), and a 16X, 0.8 numerical aperture water-immersive objective lens (Nikon Instruments, Melville, NY). A 920 nm & 980 nm two-photon laser wave-length were used for fluorescence excitation in PDGFRβ-GCaMP6s or Cspg4-DsRed mice, respectively. Blood vessels were visualized using either sulforhodamine 101 (intraperitoneal injection, 1 mg/mL) or a FITC-dextran dye (retro-orbital injection, 2 MDa, 10 mg/mL). Volumetric Z-stack ROIs were acquired from both the ipsilateral and contralateral hemisphere for each imaging session (0, 2, 4, 7, 14, 21, and 28 d post-implantation). Images were collected at ~5 s frame scan rate (1024x1024 pixels, ~5.0 μs dwell time, ~1.5-2x optical zoom) and 2–3 μm step size beginning at the pial surface all the way along the full depth of the electrode implant.
2.4. Intracortical microstimulation
Electrical stimulation trials in PDGFRβ-GCaMP6s mice were performed 1 wk following device implantation to allow the animal to recover and to assess the impacts of intracortical microstimulation on pericyte function without the interference of residual anesthesia from surgery. Electrical stimulation was administered using a Tucker-Davis Technologies RZ6D system and IZ2 stimulator (Tucker-Davis Technologies, Alachua, FL). Stimulation trials consisted of a charged balanced, bi-phasic, cathodic-leading asymmetric waveform with 200 μs leading phase, 100 μs delay, and 400 μs lagging phase at half-amplitude. Stimulation conditions varied by stimulation amplitude (5, 10, and 15 μA) and frequency (10 Hz burst, 10, 40, and 100 Hz continuous). Stimulation trials were comprised of 30 s baseline, 30 s stimulation duration, and 60 s post-stimulation during two-photon imaging. Pericyte ROIs were imaged at 128 x 128 pixels, 2 μs dwell time, and 4x optical zoom. All stimulation waveforms were delivered between 1 and 3 nC/phase, which is within the safety limit of electrical stimulation using intracortical microelectrodes. All stimulation amplitude and frequency combinations were delivered in random order and repeated at least three times.
2.5. Post-mortem immunohistochemistry
C57BL/6J mice with perpendicularly implanted probes were sacrificed at 1-, 7-, and 28 d (n = 5) following insertion for immunohistochemical analysis. Briefly, mice were anesthetized with a xylazine/ketamine cocktail and transcardially perfused with 1X PBS followed by 4 % paraformaldehyde (PFA). Probes were left intact attached the skull and within the brain and post-fixed in 4 % PFA at 4 °C overnight. Then, brains were extracted and allowed to equilibrate in 15 % and then 30 % sucrose at 4 °C for 12–24 h each. Samples were embedded and frozen in a 2:1 PBS:optimal cutting temperature (OCT) media prior to cryo-sectioning. Tissue sections of 25 μm thickness were collected horizontally along the entire depth of the implant. Prior to staining, sections were re-hydrated in 1X PBS for 5 min. For antigen retrieval, slides were incubated in 0.01 M sodium citrate buffer for 30 min at 60 °C and then in peroxidase blocking solution (10 % v/v/methanol and 3 % v/v/hydrogen peroxide) for 20 min on a table shaker at room temperature. Prior to antibody staining, sections were permeabilized with a solution of 1 % Triton X-100 and 10 % donkey serum in PBS for 30 min at RT. To eliminate non-specific binding, sections were then blocked with donkey anti-mouse IgG fragment (fab) or Alexa Fluor™ 647 conjugated anti-mouse IgG fragment (Fab) for 2 h at 1:13 or 1:16 dilution at RT. Sections were then washed 8 × 4 min in 1X PBS prior to incubating in a primary antibody solution for 12–18 h at 4 °C. Primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-NG2 (1:200, ab5320, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), goat anti-PDGFRβ (1:100, AF1042, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), mouse anti-Ki67 (1:100, 550609, BD Biosciences), and anti-Tomato lectin (1:250, B-1175, Vector Labs, Newark, CA).
The following day, sections were rinsed with 1X PBS three times for 5 min each prior to incubation with the following secondary antibodies at 1:500 in 1X PBS for 2 h at RT: Alexa Fluor™ 405 donkey anti-rabbit, Alexa Fluor™ 488 donkey anti-goat, and Alexa Fluor™ 568 donkey anti-mouse (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). After secondary antibody incubation, sections were then rinsed again with 1X PBS 3 × 5 min. Slides were mounted with Fluoromount-G, coverslipped, and allowed to dry overnight at RT before being stored in 4 °C.
2.6. Data analyses
2.6.1. Capillary constriction analysis
For measurement of capillary constriction, maximum intensity projections no greater than 10 μm on either side of the capillary vessel were captured in ImageJ for vessels of interest. Only capillaries aligned parallel to the imaging plane on either side of the pericyte soma were included for measurement. Using VasoMetrics, a custom ImageJ macro [39], the diameter of each capillary was measured at the location corresponding to the location of pericyte soma. Multiple capillaries were analyzed, and their diameters were recorded along with their distances from the probe surface.
2.6.2. Pericyte coverage analysis
Pericyte vascular coverage following chronic electrode implantation was assessed via immune-stained sections for PDGFRβ+ pericytes and lectin+ blood vessels. Both PDGFRβ and lectin stains were binarized by setting a threshold fluorescence intensity value of 2.5 times the standard deviation above the mean. Binarized images were then binned every 50 μm up to 300 μm away from the center of probe implantation. Vascular coverage was measured as the number of overlapping PDGFRβ+ and lectin+ pixels divided by the total number of lectin+ pixels within each bin. Pericyte coverage was then normalized to the contralateral hemisphere.
2.6.3. Quantification of Cspg4+/Cx3cr1+ cell distribution and surface encapsulation
The geometric distribution of the Cspg4+/Cx3cr1+ cell population was determined by generating a three-dimensional distance map of the electrode surface, as described previously [34]. Briefly, the orientation angle of the electrode within the imaged volume was determined using the ‘Interactive Stack Rotation’ plugin in ImageJ (National Institute of Health) and used to rotate the electrode into a single horizontal plane. Then, a binary mask was created by manually defining an outline of the probe, which was identified in the imaging plane where the contrast of the probe edge was the highest. This binary mask was then rotated back into the original electrode orientation and a distance transformation was applied to the resultant 3D mask using the ‘bwdist’ function in MATLAB (2022b, MathWorks, Boston, MA) to form a distance map. The spatial coordinates of identified cell counts were then referenced using this distance map for each mouse and each time point quantified.
Cspg4+ and Cx3cr1+ cellular encapsulation was determined as a percentage of fluorescent signal covering the surface of the implanted probe, as previously described [35–37]. Briefly, each image volume was rotated and resliced using the ImageJ plugin “Interactive Stack Rotation” to orient the entire length of the angled probe within a single 2D plane. Then, a small volume of tissue above the probe was sum slice projected into a single image and a binary mask was created using an “IsoData” thresholding algorithm within ImageJ. The percentage of fluorescent signal was taken as the number of non-zero pixels within a manually defined outline of the probe over the total area measured. The final dimensions of the outlined probe area were verified prior to thresholding for accuracy.
2.6.4. Pericyte GCaMP fluorescence intensity analysis
For acute insertion trials, PDGFRβ-GCaMP6s mice were imaged for up to 20 min post-insertion. ROIs of pericyte soma and processes were manually defined using the ROI manager in ImageJ. Fluorescence intensities were calculated as ΔF/F0, where F0 is the average baseline fluorescence intensity averaged over 1 min pre-insertion. Activated pericytes were defined as cells whose ΔF/F0 was greater than F0 plus three times the standard deviation (3*STD) of baseline recordings. Fluorescence intensities were normalized to pre-insertion recording of calcium activity. For electrical stimulation trials, ROIs of pericyte soma were defined manually using ImageJ, same as above. Fluorescent calcium traces were extracted using a built-in image processing toolbox, Cellular and Hemodynamic Image Processing Suite (CHIPS) [40], based on MATLAB (R2017b, Mathworks, Boston, MA). Vessel diameter traces were collected by manually defining cross-sectional lines across the vessel lumen and using VasoMetrics. Mean ΔF/F0 or ΔD/D0 was calculated as the average change in normalized calcium fluorescence or vessel diameter, respectively, during the stimulation period, where F0 and D0 were calculated as the average fluorescence intensity or vessel diameter during 30 s prior to stimulation onset. Duration was calculated as the time required for calcium fluorescence or vessel diameter to return back to baseline following stimulation onset. Area over or under the curve was calculated as the definite integral of the normalized calcium fluorescence or vessel diameter, respectively, during the stimulation period.
2.7. Statistics
A one-way or two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05) was used to assess for differences in cell counts, coverage, motility over time, distance away from the electrode, and pericyte calcium response to intracortical microstimulation. Significant pairwise differences were assessed post hoc using a Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test.
3. Results
In order to reveal potential alterations in the structure and function of brain pericytes following neural electrode implantation, we utilized two-photon microscopy to longitudinally assess dynamic changes in pericyte fate and morphology around chronically implanted microelectrode arrays. Given the importance of NG2-expressing pericytes in regulating neurovascular dynamics, we utilized Cspg4 transgenic mice to specifically visualize and manipulate pericyte activity. This model allows for targeted investigation of how pericytes contribute to the foreign body response following neural probe implantation [41], which is especially relevant as NG2/Cspg4 has been implicated in the cellular mechanisms underlying vascular remodeling and immune response activation after injury [30]. The Cspg4-DsRed model expresses the red fluorescent DsRed protein within NG2+ cells, allowing us to visually identify and characterize brain pericytes based on differences in their structure, morphology, and anatomical position within the brain (Fig. 1). For chronic two-photon imaging of pericyte activity following neural probe insertion, Cspg4-DsRed mice were implanted with a four-shank Michigan style microelectrode under an optical window for longitudinal imaging over a 28-day implantation period.
Fig. 1. Experimental setup to visualize dynamic changes of vascular mural cells around chronically implanted microelectrodes.

(a) Schematic of two-photon visualization of brain tissue through cranial glass window in Cspg4-DsRed mice over a 28-day implantation period. (b) Surgical image of multi-shank microelectrode implanted in mouse cortex underneath glass cranial window. Scale bar = 1 mm. (c) Vascular pericytes around an implanted multi-shank microelectrode array within Cspg4-DsRed mouse model. The Cspg4-DsRed mouse model reveals alterations in the structure and morphology of different distinct classes of brain mural cells, such as capillary pericytes (i), venous pericytes (ii), and smooth muscle cell (SMC) arteriole pericytes (iii). Scale bar = 100 μm, 25 μm (inset).
3.1. Pericytes constrict capillaries and increase in intracellular Ca2+ following electrode insertion
Pericytes possess contractile proteins that allow them to regulate cerebral blood flow by exerting mechanical forces on blood vessels [39,42–45]. Perturbations to the brain can produce contractions of pericyte somata and constriction of microvessels, often to a pathological extent [46,47]. To determine whether pericytes respond in a similar manner to electrode insertion, we used intravital imaging to capture changes in pericytes in real-time around an implanted microelectrode (Fig. 2a). We demonstrate that pericytes are present at positions along the capillary network where occlusions in blood flow and constriction of microvessels are apparent (Fig. 2b). For capillary constriction, we show that capillary vessels are constricted at the position of pericyte soma closer to the site of electrode insertion compared to capillary vessels measured further away (Fig. 2c). We further confirm pericyte-mediated constriction of microvessels by staining explanted brain tissue using PDGFRβ for pericytes and tomato lectin for the vasculature at 7 days post-implantation in wild-type mice (Fig. 2d). Intracellular calcium ([Ca2+]) levels regulate the contractile machinery necessary for pericytes to constrict blood vessels [39,42,48,49]. To determine whether electrode implantation alters pericyte Ca2+ activity, we implanted an electrode into the brains of PDGFRβ-GCaMP6s mice expressing GCaMP within PDGFRβ+ pericyte cells (Fig. 2e). There was a transient increase in Ca2+ within both pericyte soma and processes in the initial minutes following insertion, which was significantly different between 2 and 10 min post-insertion in pericyte soma (p < 0.01 from 2 to 7 min and p < 0.05 from 8 to 10 min post-insertion, one-sample t-test) and from 1 to 8 min and at 10 min post-insertion in pericyte processes (p < 0.05 from 1 to 8 min and 10 min post-insertion, one-sample t-test) compared to baseline levels (Fig. 2f). The temporal pattern of Ca2+ changes were similar between both soma and processes over the course of electrode insertion, with no significant differences in normalized fluorescence changes between either pericyte compartments measured (p > 0.05, two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test). Overall, we demonstrate that pericytes produce deformations on cortical microvessels around implanted microelectrodes and respond to electrode insertion through transient increases intracellular calcium.
Fig. 2. Pericytes constrict capillary vessels and transiently increase in intracellular Ca2+ following electrode insertion.

(a) Two-photon image of pericytes (Cspg4-DsRed, red) and blood vessels (FITC-dextran, green) around an implanted microelectrode (shaded blue). Scale bar = 50 μm. (b) Inset of (a) demonstrating regions of capillary occlusion and constriction (red line) overlap with position of pericyte soma. Scale bar = 20 μm. (c) Quantification of change in capillary diameter at the site of pericyte soma with respect to distance from probe surface (n = 62 capillaries, N = 3 mice). (d) Histological image demonstrating pericytes (PDGFRβ, green) located on regions of deformed capillary (Lectin, red) structures at 7 days post-implantation of a microelectrode array (white ‘x’). Yellow arrows highlight deformed regions. Scale bar = 50 μm, 25 μm (inset). (e) Time course of a transient increase in intracellular pericyte Ca2+ (yellow arrowhead) near an inserted probe over a 20 min implantation period. Scale bar = 50 μm. (f) Normalized fluorescence intensity profile of soma and process compartments of pericyte cell in (e) over 20-min post-insertion period (n = 7 soma and 7 processes, N = 3 mice). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 for each timepoint compared to time 0 min. All data is reported as mean ± SEM. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
3.2. Microelectrode implantation promotes pericyte proliferation and vascular remodeling
The acute pericyte response to severe brain injury is followed by a resurgence of proliferating pericytes into the damaged tissues regions. To understand whether pericytes respond similarly to electrode implantation injury, we implanted microelectrode arrays into the brains of Cspg4-DsRed mice and monitored the chronic response of pericytes over a 28-day implantation period. We previously characterized this chronic response by observing the proliferation of reactive glial populations around implanted microelectrodes in conjunction with the elevated expression of the proliferative marker Ki67 [12]. Using immunohistochemistry, we show that pericytes within the microenvironment of implanted electrodes during this period of dynamic tissue remodeling, identified by co-expression of NG2 and PDGFRβ markers, also express Ki67 at 1, 7, and 28 days post-implantation (Fig. 3a–c). Ki67+ pericytes were not observed on the contralateral hemisphere (Fig. 3d–f), supporting our findings that pericytes respond and proliferate specifically in response electrode implantation injury. The density of co-localized PDGFRβ+ and Ki67+ cells was significantly increased at 50–100 μm from the probe surface between 1- and 7-days post-implantation (Fig. 3g, p < 0.05 at 50–100 μm and p < 0.01 at 100–150 μm, two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test). While the density of PDGFRβ+/Ki67+ cells was reduced from 7 to 28 days in close proximity to the electrode, densities were significantly increased further away from the site of implantation at 150–200 μm between 1- and 28-days post-insertion (p < 0.01, two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test) and at 200–300 μm at 28 days post-insertion compared to 1 and 7 days post-insertion (p < 0.001, two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test). In support of our post-mortem findings, two-photon imaging experiments revealed an influx of new pericytes accumulating at the electrode-tissue interface starting within the first week up until 28 days post-implantation (Fig. 3h). These cells exhibited dynamic cell motility, migrating preferentially toward the surface of the electrode in order to facilitate vascular remodeling. The vessels previously occupied by these cells were then devoid of pericyte coverage. Consistent with our previous published study [37], we observe an increase in vascular tone of local blood vessels during this period of pericyte influx and vascular remodeling. Overall, these results support the notion that chronic electrode implantation promotes dynamic remodeling of the local tissue microenvironment through a population of proliferating pericyte cells.
Fig. 3. Influx of proliferating pericytes facilitate angiogenesis around implanted microelectrodes.

Histological stain of NG2+ (blue) and PDGFRβ+ (green) pericytes co-expressing proliferative marker Ki67 (red) around (a–c) implanted microelectrode (white ‘x’) and (d–f) contralateral, unimplanted tissue at 1, 7, and 28 days post-insertion. Yellow arrows point to areas of overlap. Scale bar = 100 μm, 50 μm (inset). (g) Density of PDGFRβ+ and Ki67+ cells in 50 μm bins up to 300 μm at 1, 7, and 28 days post-insertion (N = 5 mice). (h) Two-photon representation of time course of dynamic pericyte activity around chronically implanted microelectrodes (shaded blue). Cyan arrows indicate areas in which blood vessels lose pericyte coverage over time. Scale bars = 100 μm *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. All data is reported as mean ± SEM. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
3.3. Pericyte coverage of blood vessels is impacted by chronic microelectrode implantation
Spatial cell coverage over blood vessels within the brain is an important regulatory function unique to pericytes which allow them to maintain microvascular tone as well as modulate the level of blood-brain barrier permeability [50,51]. To determine whether pericyte coverage is affected by chronic electrode implantation, we visualized the amount of area overlap between PDGFRβ+ pericytes and lectin+ blood vessels at 1-, 7-, and 28-days post-implantation in post-mortem histological brain sections (Fig. 4a). Quantification of normalized area occupied by either PDGFRβ+ pericytes or lectin+ blood vessels was not significantly impacted over a 300 μm radius around the implanted microelectrode at either 1-, 7-, or 28-days post-insertion (Fig. 4b–c, p > 0.05, two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test). We did however observe both a reduction in PDGFRβ+ area and an increase in lectin+ area specifically within 0–50 μm from the probe surface at 7 days post-insertion. While statistical analyses of these changes in area alone did not reveal a significant effect, quantification of pericyte coverage of blood vessels (PDGFRβ+/lectin+ area over total lectin+ area) around our implanted microelectrodes resulted in a slight significant reduction in coverage compared to contralateral tissue within a 0–50 μm distance from the probe surface at 7 days post-implantation (Fig. 4d, p = 0.05, two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test). These results are in line with our earlier discussed two-photon findings and suggest that pericyte coverage of blood vessels in proximity to the electrode surface may be impacted by the injury sustained during implantation.
Fig. 4. Microelectrode implantation impact on pericyte coverage of blood vessels.

(a) Histological representation of pericyte (PDGFRβ, green) coverage of blood vessels (Lectin, red) around chronically implanted microelectrodes. Yellow represents the overlap between PDGFRβ and lectin stains. Scale bar = 100 μm, 25 μm (inset). (b) Normalized PDGFRβ+ area within 50 μm bins up to 300 μm at 1, 7, and 28 days post-insertion. (c) Normalized lectin+ area within 50 μm bins up to 300 μm at 1, 7, and 28 days post-insertion. (d) Normalized pericyte coverage (PDGFRβ+ area over lectin+ area) reveals significant reduction within 0–50 μm at 7 days post-insertion. N = 5 mice. *p < 0.05. All data is reported as mean ± SEM. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
3.4. Involvement of dual-expressing Cspg4+/Cx3cr1+ cells in surface encapsulation of chronically implanted electrodes
Pericytes have been previously implicated in the formation of a fibrotic scar. We previously reported on a temporally distinct pattern of device encapsulation by NG2 glia and microglia cells [12,37]. To determine whether Cspg4+ expressing pericytes participated in the encapsulation of implanted microelectrodes, we generated a dual-fluorescent Cspg4-DsRed::Cx3cr1-GFP mouse model to visualize electrode encapsulation of both brain cell populations within the same animal (Fig. 5a). In the healthy, intact brain, both pericytes and microglia occupy spatially distinct tissue regions (Fig. 5b). With chronic electrode implantation, we determined that both Cspg4+ and Cx3cr1+ cells gradually encapsulate the electrode surface over a 28-day implantation period (Fig. 5c). Interestingly, we observed distinct regions on the electrode surface in which DsRed+ and GFP+ cells overlap. Upon quantitative measurement, we showed that the encapsulation region of these dual-labeled GFP+/DsRed+ cells were temporally distinct from that of DsRed+ and GFP+ areas alone (Fig. 5d). Initially, coverage of the electrode was dominated solely by the GFP+ signal alone, which was significantly increased compared to DsRed+ only and GFP+/DsRed+ signals up to 2 days post-insertion (p < 0.001, two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test). Then, at 4 days post-insertion, there was an increase in combined GFP+/DsRed+ signal compared to both GFP+ and DsRed+ signals alone. After one week, coverage of the electrode surface by DsRed+ only and GFP+/DsRed+ signal gradually declines up to three weeks later, while the GFP+ only signal remains significantly elevated at 28 days post-insertion (p < 0.05, two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test). Whereas surface coverage of individual Cx3cr1+ or Cspg4+ cells has been previously recognized, here we report a spatially and temporally distinct pattern of surface encapsulation by dual-labeled Cx3cr1+/Cspg4+ cells, suggesting the emergence of a novel reactive brain cell population around chronically implanted microelectrodes.
Fig. 5. Temporal pattern of microelectrode encapsulation by spatially distinct Cspg4+ and Cx3cr1+ cell populations.

(a) Two-photon representative image of a microelectrode (shaded blue) inserted in a Cspg4-DsRed::Cx3cr1-GFP mouse. Blood vessels (blue) are visualized using an intravascular fluorescent dye. Scale bar = 50 μm. (b) Histological image of stained blood vessels (blue), PDGFRβ+ pericytes (red), and Iba-1+ microglia (green) in healthy, uninjured brain tissue. Scale bar = 100 μm. (c) Two-photon representative images of surface encapsulation of chronically implanted microelectrodes of Cspg4+ (red) and Cx3cr1+ (green) brain populations. Yellow here denotes overlapping DsRed and GFP fluorescent signals. Scale bar = 50 μm. The dashed line outlines the implanted microelectrode. (d) Percent coverage of DsRed+ only, GFP+ only, and overlapping DsRed+/GFP+ signal over 28-day implantation period (N = 4 mice). *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. All data is reported as mean ± SEM. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
3.5. Novel Cx3cr1+/Cspg4+ population of reactive glial cells accumulate at the site of neural electrode implantation
From our analyses intended to better understand the spatial relationship between activated microglia and pericyte cells following surface coverage of chronically implanted microelectrodes, we discovered the appearance of a unique population of immune cells at the electrode-tissue interface which simultaneously express GFP+ and DsRed+ fluorophores denoting constitutive expression of both Cx3cr1 and Cspg4 promoters (Fig. 6a). Dual-labeled Cx3cr1+/Cspg4+ cells were distinct from individual Cx3cr1+ and Cspg4+ cells in morphology and positioning around chronic microelectrodes. Furthermore, these cells were not observed within contralateral (unimplanted) brain regions, suggesting an injury-specific emergence to chronically implanted devices. The appearance of Cx3cr1+/Cspg4+ cells began at 2–4 days, significantly increased during the first 7 days, and stabilized toward the end of a 28-day implantation period (Fig. 6b, p < 0.01, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test). During this time, the number of Cx3cr1+/Cspg4+ cells counted across all time points significantly increased in very close spatial proximity (<50 μm) to the implanted electrode (Fig. 6c, p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test). Investigation of the cortical depth in which these cells were observed revealed their positioning within 0–200 μm below the surface of the brain (layer I-II) (Fig. 6d). Cx3cr1+/Cspg4+ cells demonstrated active extension and retraction of processes toward the surface of the electrode over short imaging durations (<30 min) at any given time point (Fig. 6e). Finally, Cx3cr1+/Cspg4+ cells were most motile within the first week of electrode implantation, before stabilizing over the electrode surface between 2 and 4 weeks post-implantation (Fig. 6f). Patterns of motility seen in our visual findings were similarly demonstrated in quantification of the motility of different cellular compartments of Cx3cr1+/Cspg4+ cells, revealing high soma movement within the first week before decreasing over the following 2–3 weeks post-implantation (Fig. 6g and h). Our results reveal for the first time a specialized population of reactive immune cells to the chronic implantation of a microelectrode array.
Fig. 6. Emergence of reactive dual-Cx3cr1+/Cspg4+ expressing cell population around chronically implanted microelectrodes.

(a) Two-photon representative images of implanted microelectrodes (shaded blue) and contralateral control region over 28 day implantation period in a Cspg4-DsRed::Cx3cr1-GFP mouse. Scale bar = 50 μm. (b) Average number of DsRed+/GFP+ cells counted over time post-insertion around chronically implanted microelectrode arrays. (c) Total number of DsRed+/GFP+ cells counted with respect to spatially binned distance away from the microelectrode surface across all timepoints. (d) Average distance of DsRed+/GFP+ with respect to pial surface over a 28 day implantation period. (e) Representative two-photon image demonstrating transition of DsRed+/GFP+ cell from a ramified to activated state over a 30 min period. Scale bar = 10 μm (f) Superimposition of two time intervals 30 min apart demonstrating the change in motility of DsRed+/GFP+ cells over a 28 day implantation period. Note: Red vs. green labeling distinguishes between earlier (0 min, green) vs. later (30 min, red) timepoints, highlighting stationary features in yellow. Scale bar = 50 μm. (g) Average cell body velocity of DsRed+/GFP+ cells over a 28 day implantation period. (h) Average process velocity of DsRed+/GFP+ cells over a 28 day implantation period. N = 4 mice. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. All data is reported as mean ± SEM. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
3.6. Intracortical microstimulation modulates pericyte calcium dynamics in an amplitude- and frequency-dependent manner
The interplay between neurons and pericytes forms the basis behind neurovascular coupling. To understand how different patterns of neural activity can modulate pericyte Ca2+, we implanted a stimulating microelectrode in PDGFRβ-GCaMP6s mice (Fig. 7a). Electrical stimulation was administered using cathodic-leading, biphasic, charge-balanced waveforms with varying stimulating amplitudes (5, 10, and 15 μA) and frequencies (10 Hz burst, 10 Hz, 40 Hz, and 100 Hz) delivered over a 30-s stimulation duration (Fig. 7b). Modulating neural activity through intracortical microstimulation resulted in a visible decrease in pericyte calcium during the stimulation period before returning to pre-stimulation levels (Fig. 7c). We determined that the amplitude of electrical stimulation can modulate the calcium activity of sphincter pericytes, highly contractile cells at the surface of the brain, as well as the diameter of the underlying vasculature, with 15 μA eliciting the largest change in magnitude compared to 5 and 10 μA (Supplementary Fig. 1). Therefore, we used 15 μA stimulating waveforms to determine whether there was any additional modulation based on varying frequency of electrical stimulation. We observed a clear modulatory effect of increasing frequency of stimulation on changes in pericyte calcium fluorescence (Fig. 7d). Specifically, we observed a significant decrease in mean ΔF/F0 at 40 Hz frequency of stimulation compared to 10 Hz burst or 10 Hz continuous stimulation throughout the stimulation period (Fig. 7e, p < 0.05 for 10 Hz burst vs. 40 Hz, p < 0.01 for 10 Hz vs. 40 Hz, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test) as well as a significantly greater area over the ΔF/F0 curve at 40 and 100 Hz stimulation compared to 10 Hz burst or 10 Hz continuous (Fig. 7g, p < 0.05 for 10 Hz burst vs. 40 Hz, p < 0.01 for 10 Hz vs. 40 Hz, p < 0.05 for 10 Hz vs. 100 Hz, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test). When looking at duration of pericyte Ca2+ activation during the electrical stimulation period, we observed an increase in response duration at 40 Hz stimulation compared to all other stimulation frequencies but did not detect any significant differences (Fig. 7f, p > 0.05, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test). We discovered similar patterns of frequency modulation on intracellular Ca2+ dynamics within sphincter pericytes following intracortical microstimulation but with a greater change in magnitude (Supplementary Figs. 2a–g). We could not determine whether there were any changes in capillary tone alongside changes in calcium activity of adjacent pericytes during stimulation (data not shown), most likely due to the resolution constraints of our in vivo imaging system. However, we were able to detect a modulatory effect of stimulation frequency on the diameter of large arteriole blood vessels near sphincter pericytes (Supplementary Fig. 2h). Similar to the changes in intracellular pericyte calcium, increasing stimulation frequency resulted in large magnitude increases in diameter of underlying blood vessels (Supplementary Figs. 2i–k). Taken together, these results demonstrate that pericyte calcium and, by extension, vascular function can be modulated by varying the strength and activation patterns of local neural activity.
Fig. 7. Intracortical microstimulation modulates pericyte Ca2+ in a frequency-dependent manner.

(a) Two-photon visualization of pericyte Ca2+ dynamics during intracortical microstimulation (electrode not shown) using PDGFRβ-GCaMP6s mice. Scale bars = 10 μm. (b) Intracortical microstimulation waveforms consisted of cathodic-leading, biphasic, charge-balanced electrical pulses delivered at 10 Hz burst, 10 Hz, 40 Hz, or 100 Hz frequencies over a 30 s stimulation period. (c) Example of decrease in Ca2+ of capillary pericyte (green) adjacent to the stimulating electrode (shaded blue). Underlying blood vessels were visualized using SR101 (red). Scale bar = 10 μm. (d) Example Ca2+ traces during intracortical microstimulation at 10 Hz burst, 10 Hz, 40 Hz, or 100 Hz frequency. (e–g) Mean ΔF/F0, duration, and area over the curve during stimulation period at 10 Hz burst, 10 Hz, 40 Hz, or 100 Hz frequency (N = 3 mice, n = 5 cells). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. All data is reported as mean ± SEM. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
4. Discussion
Penetrating microelectrodes allow researchers to interface directly with the brain and manipulate discrete brain cell populations in order to understand the function and dysfunction of our nervous system. While the long-term application of recording or stimulating electrodes can be used to diagnose and treat neurological brain dysfunction, their performance longevity and fidelity are limited by a severe foreign body response to an indwelling object within the brain. Efforts to identify the biological culprits responsible for a gradual decline in electrode performance have been obstructed by variable outcomes in the brain’s response to implanted probes. One potential source of that variability may be due to a yet poorly understood impact of chronic electrode implantation on perivascular cells within the brain. Pericytes are brain mural cells responsible for governing a variety of neuroimmune, homeostatic, and regulatory functions related to neuronal network activity and neurovascular coupling [19,50–56]. Abnormal pericyte pathology has been emerging more as a key hallmark in the neurodegenerative sequence of events of a variety of brain injury conditions as well as disease [21–23,46,54,57–61]. Using intravital imaging, we assess the impact of chronic microelectrode implantation on the structure and function of pericytes within the mouse cortex. Our results reveal distinct phases of both acute and chronic responses of pericytes to neural electrode implantation. Using dual-reporting fluorescent transgenic models, we report for the first time the discovery of a novel subset of reactive immune cells around implanted electrodes from our in vivo investigations. Finally, using electrical microstimulation we demonstrate that pericyte activity and vascular function can be modulated in an amplitude- and frequency-dependent manner.
4.1. Acute pericyte dysfunction in response to microelectrode implantation
We revealed that insertion of a microelectrode within the brain significantly increases the intracellular Ca2+ levels of nearby pericytes within the first 10 min of implantation (Fig. 2). Neurons have also been shown to transiently increase their intracellular Ca2+ activity following microelectrode implantation [34]. One possibility for the sequence of events observed here is that these activated pericytes are responding to electrical or chemical signals emitted from activated neurons following electrode insertion and thereby elevating their own intracellular Ca2+ levels [62]. Previous work has shown neurotransmitters, including dopamine, noradrenealine, and ATP, have direct effects on pericytes, leading to the contraction of pericyte-associated vasculature [43,54,63]. Intracellular Ca2+ activity within pericytes is invariably tied to their contractile function. However, due to the limitations in laser scan settings and image resolution, we were unable to discern whether activated pericytes during electrode insertion induced constriction of underlying capillary vessels. The strength of Ca2+ responses were not significantly different between pericyte soma and their processes (Fig. 2e and f). However, it has been demonstrated that the circumferential processes responsible for wrapping around capillaries and mechanically contracting the endothelial lumen are positioned closest to pericyte soma [55]. In agreement with this idea, we demonstrate that pericytes produce maximal constriction of capillary vessels at the position of their cell soma (Fig. 2c). Similar results have been demonstrated in the presence of amyloid β oligomers within a rodent model of Alzheimer’s disease, which act on pericytes by inducing pericyte constriction of microvessels [58]. We also similarly observed obstructions in capillary flow at the site of pericyte soma positioned nearby an implanted microelectrode, suggesting their contractility to electrode insertion can contribute to reductions in cerebral blood flow (Fig. 2d). While the concept of constricted microvessels and stalled blood flow around indwelling electrodes has been proposed previously [7,35], this is the first report to our knowledge implicating pericytes in the neurovascular dysfunction incurred during electrode implantation.
4.2. Pericytes proliferate and facilitate vascular remodeling during the chronic response to electrode implantation
We previously revealed a spatiotemporal pattern of glial proliferation around chronically implanted microelectrodes [12]. In this same study, we also reported on an increased number of PDGFRβ+ and NG2+ pericytes at 7 days post-implantation of a microelectrode array. Here, we show that this increase in number of pericytes is due to cellular proliferation within the first 7- and 28-days post-implantation (Fig. 3). Similar time courses of pericyte proliferation and influx into damaged tissue regions following stroke have been reported [23]. During this time of elevated cellular proliferation, we observe pericytes remodel local vascular architecture around chronically implanted microelectrodes (Fig. 4). Although we were not able to track the longitudinal relationship between individual pericytes or groups of pericytes due to gradual decline in imaging quality incurred from electrode insertion over time, the findings from these two figures suggest that structural remodeling of the pericyte population is likely to be occurring. Disruptions in pericyte-pericyte contacts have been reported in other pathological contexts, such as stroke and traumatic brain injury, where pericyte detachment and migration are associated with vascular remodeling and dysfunction [21,50,64]. This suggests that similar processes may be at play following electrode implantation, contributing to the dynamic changes observed in local vascular architecture.
Angiogenesis is a function unique to pericytes and is triggered by the binding of platelet-derived growth factor BB (PDGF-BB) secreted from sprouting endothelial tip cells onto platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFR-β) expressed on pericyte membranes [65]. This endothelial cell signaling recruits pericytes to areas required for re-vascularization and allows pericytes to establish contact with sprouting vessels, directing and stabilizing the endothelial growth. Angiogenesis is a regenerative tissue response following conditions of tissue hypoxia, such as in stroke, or in the case of high cellular metabolic demands, such as within the tumor microenvironment. The potential for ischemic injury following microelectrode implantation has been reported before through hemodynamic imaging of intrinsic signals around a chronically implanted microelectrode [13]. Pericytes are also known to facilitate leukocyte infiltration following severe brain injury. The generation of new blood vessels around chronically implanted electrodes could be a means to recruit peripheral immune cells to the electrode implant. Indeed, infiltration macrophages has previously been shown to consist of a significant population of immune cells around an implanted microelectrode array [66]. However, whether this presents a detriment to the survival of neural tissue around chronically implanted microelectrodes remains to be explored.
4.3. Appearance of a distinct subset of reactive immune cells around chronically implanted microelectrodes
To our surprise, we witnessed the emergence of a phenotypically distinct population of reactive cells within the electrode-tissue interface through the generation of a dual-fluorescent transgenic mouse model. These cells expressed both Cspg4 and Cx3cr1 promoters given their simultaneous 1:1 expression of DsRed and GFP fluorophores, respectively. No dual-labeled Cspg4+/Cx3cr1+ cells were seen within the contralateral hemisphere, suggesting they appear specifically in response to the injury caused by electrode insertion (Fig. 6a). Cspg4+/Cx3cr1+ cells first appeared 2–4 days after implantation and their numbers peaked by the end of the first week (Fig. 6b). The distribution of these cells was spatially confined to tissue areas immediately adjacent to the electrode surface (<50 μm). To our knowledge, this is the first report of its kind characterizing the appearance and behavior of a novel population of reactive cells within the electrode-tissue interface. One possibility is that these cells are a reactive subset of pericytes (i.e. Cspg4-expressing cells upregulating expression of Cx3cr1 promoter) operating within the fibrotic scar region of chronically implanted microelectrodes. Previous studies have reported on the ability for pericytes to develop microglia-like phenotypes in conditions of severe brain injury, such as stroke [28,29,67]. In contrast, others have reported no evidence of pericyte expression of microglial markers by pericytes in other pathological conditions, such as acute brain injury [68]. This may be explained by differences in pathological conditions in which these cells were observed. Alternatively, these cells could constitute a subset of reactive microglia in response to electrode implantation injury (i.e. Cx3cr1-expressing cells upregulating expression of Cspg4 promoter). This possibility is more plausible given that microglia have demonstrated previously to upregulate the NG2 proteoglycan acutely in response to transient brain injury [68]. It is not clear from the data acquired here whether these injury-responsive cells are fundamentally neuroprotective or neurotoxic to the tissue microenvironment around chronic electrodes. Transcriptomic analyses of populations within mouse models of Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease determined that Cx3cr1+ microglia upregulate Cspg4 expression specifically in the context of neurodegenerative conditions [69]. These Cspghigh microglial cells were found to be highly proliferative, due to upregulation of genes associated with the cell cycle, and differ functionally from disease-associated microglia (DAM), which are more phagocytic in nature [69]. Furthermore, transitional morphologies and patterns of cell motility and behavior of the cells characterized in this paper are reminiscent of other tissue scavengers commonly observed near the electrode surface, such as activated microglia and macrophages [35,37]. Future work should focus on characterizing the functional role of this newly discovered population of reactive immune cells around chronically implanted microelectrodes.
4.4. Modulation of neurovascular function using intracortical microstimulation
We have previously shown that neuronal activity can be modulated electrically by differing stimulation parameters, such as amplitude, frequency, or temporal patterning [70–74]. Moreover, different stimulation parameters cause varying degree of metabolic activity [73], and greater metabolic activity during stimulation is related to sustained neuronal depression [74]. Here, we show that, similar to neurons, the calcium activity within pericytes can be modulated by varying intracortical stimulation parameters (Fig. 7). We report both decreases in intracellular calcium and proportional increases in underlying vascular tone when increasing the amplitude, or strength, of electrical stimulation (Fig. 7 and Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). These effects on calcium fluorescence and vessel diameter were more readily observed in superficial sphincter cells, which populate larger arteriole blood vessels closer to the surface of the cortex [75], than in downstream capillary pericytes on higher-order branches of the vascular tree. Considering that the contractile proteins within mural cells necessary to exert mechanical changes in vascular tone are calcium-dependent, it is not surprising that larger changes in pericyte Ca2+ are accompanied by similar changes in vessel diameter. When varying stimulation frequency, we determined that higher frequencies of electrical stimulation such as 40 and 100 Hz produced greater decreases in mean ΔF/F and duration of activation compared to a lower 10 Hz frequency (Fig. 7d–g). We did not detect any difference in mean ΔF/F or duration of activation when varying temporal pattern of stimulation (10 Hz burst versus 10 Hz continuous).
While we can confirm that pericyte activity and vascular function can be modulated by intracortical microstimulation in an amplitude- and frequency-dependent manner, the nature of our experimental design prevented us from determining the underlying mechanisms involved. One possible explanation of our results could be due to direct activation of pericytes via electrical stimulation. Pericytes express voltage-sensitive ion channels [55], suggesting their membrane potentials can be directly influenced by an applied electric field [76]. Pericytes are also known to be electrically coupled to underlying endothelial cells due to their direct association through gap junctions and could therefore be responsive to stimulation-induced voltage changes occurring within endothelial cells along the vascular tree [77]. Alternatively, our findings could be the result of an indirect activation of pericytes by stimulating local neuronal activity. We have shown previously that increasing stimulation frequency (>100 Hz) recruits more sparse populations of neuronal cell bodies and results in an overall decrease in neuronal calcium activity when compared to lower frequencies of stimulation (<10 Hz) [71]. One possibility is that higher stimulation frequencies recruit different sub-populations of neurons (i.e. excitatory versus inhibitory neurons) compared to lower frequencies. Future work could determine whether pericytes are directly activated by electrical stimulation through optogenetic or pharmacological suppression of neuronal activity. Additionally, optogenetic control of specific neuronal populations could be employed to assess whether changes in neuronal activity lead to corresponding alterations in pericyte calcium activity. These approaches would help clarify the mechanisms underlying the observed modulation of pericyte function during electrical stimulation.
4.5. Limitations of study & future directions
Despite being identified over a century ago, it is only within the last couple of decades that the physiology and pathology of pericytes have only recently begun to be well understood [53,78]. This could be partly because pericytes are increasingly emerging as a heterogeneous group of vascular cells within the brain with a wide spectrum of genetic, structural, morphological, anatomical, physiological, and neuropathological profiles [39,79]. In the past, an inability for researchers to agree on how to robustly categorize these cells properly across different experimental studies has limited the translational application of new knowledge [53]. For example, unlike neurons, microglia, and astrocytes, there is not one biomarker currently known that identifies only perivascular pericytes. Common pericyte markers such as NG2 or PDGFRβ are shared in some capacity by other structurally and functionally distinct cell populations within the brain. Therefore, accurate identification and characterization of pericyte cells depends on the co-localization of two or more markers to rule out other cell populations. Furthermore, a severe lack of appropriate investigative tools and experimental models has added to the difficulty in effective study of brain pericytes in the past.
The recent development of more advanced neuroscience techniques and advanced animal models have shown promise on revealing the distinct role of pericytes in brain function and dysfunction [80]. Some in vivo dyes were found to only be taken up by certain cell populations within the brain, such as NeuroTrace 500/525 in pericytes [81], and have demonstrated some success in the specific investigation of capillary pericytes. However, this dye requires topical application onto the brain and is therefore only applicable in studies which utilize an open skull preparation. In our study, we use a Cspg4-DsRed mouse model which constitutively expresses a red fluorescent protein within pericyte cells in the brain [82]. This has been commonly used to assess pericyte physiology and pathology within the brain in the past, which can be accurately performed by identifying and characterizing cells which demonstrate the same anatomical, morphological, and structural properties as classically identified brain pericytes (i.e. anatomical position along blood vessels with “bump on a log” morphology) [54,75,83]. However, in certain pathological conditions which promote mural cell reactivity and pericytosis, such as detachment from blood vessels and migration into the scarred region following brain injury, the assessment of pericyte fate and function becomes more difficult.
The Cspg4 gene encodes for the NG2 proteoglycan, which is not only expressed in pericytes but also known to be commonly expressed within oligodendrocyte precursor cells (NG2 glia), as well as microglia and astrocytes in certain pathological conditions [68]. We previously characterized the spatiotemporal reactivity of NG2 glia around implanted microelectrodes [37]. Given the limitation in the model used, it is difficult to say whether the DsRed+ cells we observed encapsulating the electrode surface are partly from DsRed+ pericyte cells or if they consist of other glial cells which upregulate expression of NG2 following implantation injury. In this study, we used Ki67 as a marker of proliferation to assess the overall proliferative state of cells in the vicinity of the electrode. However, a more sophisticated follow-up study could employ the use of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU), an alternative marker for proliferation. BrdU allows labeling of cells based on the timing of their division depending on timing of BrdU administration, which would enhance the ability to discern the origin and fate of reactive cell populations at different timepoints during the lifespan of implanted electrodes [84]. To clarify the identity of these populations, future experiments can also utilize advanced transgenic mouse lines, such as the recently developed pericyte-CreER line, which expresses fluorophores under multiple promoters whose co-expression is specific only to vascular mural cells, such as the NG2 and PDGFRβ promoters [57]. Lastly, use of single cell genetic sequencing to better understand gene expression profiles will offer profound insight on the origin, fate, and function of these seemingly phenotypically-similar reactive cell populations interacting at the electrode-tissue interface [69].
How these observed changes in pericyte structure and function incurred as a result of electrode implantation affect overall electrode performance still remains unknown. This study did not make any comparisons on differences in parameters relating to device design, flexibility, or on the insertion of the electrode itself. However, because advanced neural technology is evolving towards designs which are more flexible, smaller-profile, and whose surfaces are biochemically-treated, it is important to consider how these factors might affect the biological reactivity of local brain tissue. Electrodes that are larger and less mechanically compliant with brain tissue will incur more initial blood-brain barrier disruption upon insertion, which may initiate a cascade of events, such as plasma leakage, immune cell activation, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration, that could exacerbate pericyte inflammation and disrupt their homeostatic functions [7,12,16,37,38]. Therefore, future studies should compare how factors involved in device insertion [16] or design [85] differentially impact pericyte dynamics and assess their effects on vascular stability [36,37,86], blood-brain barrier integrity [17], lysosomal function [87], waste and debris clearance [88], and the long-term functionality of implanted neural electrodes [89].
5. Conclusion
Development of advanced neural electrode technology is accelerating our understanding of nervous system health and disease at a rapid pace. Yet, despite their potential as tools for neuroscience discovery and clinical rehabilitation, intracortical electrodes regularly suffer from de-preciations in detecting and modulating brain activity as a result of severe biological responses to a foreign body. Due to the inherent complexity of the brain’s immune response to device injury, the mechanisms which govern biological failure modes of neural implants remain unknown. Efforts to pinpoint exact biological correlates of device performance are confounded by a poorly understood heterogeneity of immune cells (i.e. myeloid cells) within the brain which are known to regulate tissue homeostasis, inflammation, and wound repair following injury. Brain pericytes are one such myeloid population whose contribution to the bodily tissue reactions to implanted electrodes is currently unknown. Here, we employed two-photon imaging of multiple transgenic mouse models over a 28-day implantation period to elucidate dynamic changes in the fate and behavior of pericyte cells during the course of microelectrode implantation. We discovered that pericytes are dynamic in the presence of chronically implanted electrodes, initially constricting around capillary microvessels in response to electrode insertion before actively engaging in tissue remodeling at the electrode-tissue interface. During our investigation we also reveal a distinct population of reactive immune cells present within the scar region of chronically implanted microelectrodes. Finally, we established that the calcium activity of pericytes can be altered through intracortical microstimulation in an amplitude- and frequency-dependent manner. Future work further characterizing the heterogeneity in brain tissue responses of the pericyte population and their pathological roles within the brain will facilitate the development of more biologically adaptive implants and innovative therapeutic strategies to combat the body’s inherent immune response to brain injury and disease.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH NINDS R21NS108098, NIH NINDS R01NS094396 and a diversity supplement to the parent grant, NIH NINDS R01NS105691, NIH NINDS R01NS115707 and a diversity supplement to the parent grant, NIH R01NS129632, NSF CBET CAREER 1943906, and NIH NINDS F99NS124186.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122963.
Footnotes
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Data availability
Data will be made available on request.
References
- [1].Steinmetz NA, et al. , Neuropixels 2.0: a miniaturized high-density probe for stable, long-term brain recordings, Science 372 (6539) (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Lee K, et al. , Flexible, scalable, high channel count stereo-electrode for recording in the human brain, Nat. Commun. 15 (1) (2024) 218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Lycke R, et al. , Low-threshold, high-resolution, chronically stable intracortical microstimulation by ultraflexible electrodes, Cell Rep. 42 (6) (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Pérez-Prieto N, Delgado-Restituto M, Recording strategies for high channel count, densely spaced microelectrode arrays, Front. Neurosci. 15 (2021) 681085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Hughes CL, et al. , Perception of microstimulation frequency in human somatosensory cortex, Elife 10 (2021) e65128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Flesher SN, et al. , Intracortical microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex, Sci. Transl. Med. 8 (361) (2016), 361ra141–361ra141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Kozai TD, et al. , Brain tissue responses to neural implants impact signal sensitivity and intervention strategies, ACS Chem. Neurosci. 6 (1) (2015) 48–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Szymanski LJ, et al. , Neuropathological effects of chronically implanted, intracortical microelectrodes in a tetraplegic patient, J. Neural. Eng. 18 (4) (2021) 460b9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Urdaneta ME, et al. , The long-term stability of intracortical microstimulation and the foreign body response are layer dependent, Front. Neurosci. 16 (2022) 908858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Wellman SM, Cambi F, Kozai TD, The role of oligodendrocytes and their progenitors on neural interface technology: a novel perspective on tissue regeneration and repair, Biomaterials 183 (2018) 200–217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Wellman SM, Kozai TD, Understanding the Inflammatory Tissue Reaction to Brain Implants to Improve Neurochemical Sensing Performance, ACS Publications, 2017, pp. 2578–2582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Wellman SM, et al. , Revealing spatial and temporal patterns of cell death, glial proliferation, and blood-brain barrier dysfunction around implanted intracortical neural interfaces, Front. Neurosci. 13 (2019) 493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Michelson NJ, et al. , Multi-scale, multi-modal analysis uncovers complex relationship at the brain tissue-implant neural interface: new emphasis on the biological interface, J. Neural. Eng. 15 (3) (2018) 033001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Rousche PJ, Normann RA, Chronic recording capability of the Utah Intracortical Electrode Array in cat sensory cortex, J. Neurosci. Methods 82 (1) (1998) 1–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Williams JC, Rennaker RL, Kipke DR, Long-term neural recording characteristics of wire microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex, Brain Res. Protoc. 4 (3) (1999) 303–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Kozai TDY, et al. , Reduction of neurovascular damage resulting from microelectrode insertion into the cerebral cortex using in vivo two-photon mapping, J. Neural. Eng. 7 (4) (2010) 046011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Bjornsson C, et al. , Effects of insertion conditions on tissue strain and vascular damage during neuroprosthetic device insertion, J. Neural. Eng. 3 (3) (2006) 196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Sweeney MD, Ayyadurai S, Zlokovic BV, Pericytes of the neurovascular unit: key functions and signaling pathways, Nat. Neurosci. 19 (6) (2016) 771–783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Kozberg M, Hillman E, Neurovascular coupling and energy metabolism in the developing brain, Prog. Brain Res. 225 (2016) 213–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Kozai TD, et al. , Effects of caspase-1 knockout on chronic neural recording quality and longevity: insight into cellular and molecular mechanisms of the reactive tissue response, Biomaterials 35 (36) (2014) 9620–9634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Dalkara T, Alarcon-Martinez L, Yemisci M, Pericytes in ischemic stroke, in: Pericyte Biology in Disease, Springer, 2019, pp. 189–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Di Z, et al. , Effect of pericytes on cerebral microvasculature at different time points of stroke, BioMed Res. Int. 2021 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Fernández-Klett F, et al. , Early loss of pericytes and perivascular stromal cell-induced scar formation after stroke, J. Cerebr. Blood Flow Metabol. 33 (3) (2013) 428–439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Hess DC, et al. , Hematopoietic origin of microglial and perivascular cells in brain, Exp. Neurol. 186 (2) (2004) 134–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Ozerdem U, Stallcup WB, Early contribution of pericytes to angiogenic sprouting and tube formation, Angiogenesis 6 (3) (2003) 241–249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Halliday MR, et al. , Accelerated pericyte degeneration and blood-brain barrier breakdown in apolipoprotein E4 carriers with Alzheimer’s disease, J. Cerebr. Blood Flow Metabol. 36 (1) (2016) 216–227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Dabravolski SA, et al. , The role of pericytes in regulation of innate and adaptive immunity, Biomedicines 11 (2) (2023) 600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Özen I, et al. , Brain pericytes acquire a microglial phenotype after stroke, Acta Neuropathol. 128 (3) (2014) 381–396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Sakuma R, et al. , Brain pericytes serve as microglia-generating multipotent vascular stem cells following ischemic stroke, J. Neuroinflammation 13 (1) (2016) 1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Ampofo E, et al. , The regulatory mechanisms of NG2/CSPG4 expression, Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 22 (2017) 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Rhodes K, Raivich G, Fawcett J, The injury response of oligodendrocyte precursor cells is induced by platelets, macrophages and inflammation-associated cytokines, Neuroscience 140 (1) (2006) 87–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Gao Q, et al. , NG2, a member of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans family mediates the inflammatory response of activated microglia, Neuroscience 165 (2) (2010) 386–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Chen K, et al. , In vivo spatiotemporal patterns of oligodendrocyte and myelin damage at the neural electrode interface, Biomaterials 268 (2021) 120526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Eles JR, et al. , In vivo imaging of neuronal calcium during electrode implantation: spatial and temporal mapping of damage and recovery, Biomaterials 174 (2018) 79–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Kozai TDY, et al. , In vivo two-photon microscopy reveals immediate microglial reaction to implantation of microelectrode through extension of processes, J. Neural. Eng. 9 (6) (2012) 066001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Savya SP, et al. , In vivo spatiotemporal dynamics of astrocyte reactivity following neural electrode implantation, Biomaterials 289 (2022) 121784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Wellman SM, Kozai TD, In vivo spatiotemporal dynamics of NG2 glia activity caused by neural electrode implantation, Biomaterials 164 (2018) 121–133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Kozai TD, et al. , Two-photon imaging of chronically implanted neural electrodes: sealing methods and new insights, J. Neurosci. Methods 258 (2016) 46–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].McDowell KP, et al. , VasoMetrics: unbiased spatiotemporal analysis of microvascular diameter in multi-photon imaging applications, Quant. Imag. Med. Surg. 11 (3) (2021) 969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Barrett MJ, et al. , CHIPS: an Extensible Toolbox for Cellular and Hemodynamic Two-Photon Image Analysis, Springer, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Jung B, et al. , Visualization of vascular mural cells in developing brain using genetically labeled transgenic reporter mice, J. Cerebr. Blood Flow Metabol. 38 (3) (2018) 456–468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Nelson AR, et al. , Channelrhodopsin excitation contracts brain pericytes and reduces blood flow in the aging mouse brain in vivo, Front. Aging Neurosci. 12 (2020) 108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Peppiatt CM, et al. , Bidirectional control of CNS capillary diameter by pericytes, Nature 443 (7112) (2006) 700–704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Herman IM, D’Amore PA, Microvascular pericytes contain muscle and nonmuscle actins, J. Cell Biol. 101 (1) (1985) 43–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Dessalles CA, Babataheri A, Barakat AI, Pericyte mechanics and mechanobiology, J. Cell Sci. 134 (6) (2021) jcs240226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Costa MA, et al. , Pericytes constrict blood vessels after myocardial ischemia, J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 116 (2018) 1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Yemisci M, et al. , Pericyte contraction induced by oxidative-nitrative stress impairs capillary reflow despite successful opening of an occluded cerebral artery, Nat. Med. 15 (9) (2009) 1031–1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Li Y, et al. , A switch in the pathway of TRPC3-mediated calcium influx into brain pericytes contributes to capillary spasms after subarachnoid hemorrhage, Neurotherapeutics (2024) e00380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Kamouchi M, et al. , Calcium influx pathways in rat CNS pericytes, Mol. Brain Res. 126 (2) (2004) 114–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Berthiaume A-A, et al. , Dynamic remodeling of pericytes in vivo maintains capillary coverage in the adult mouse brain, Cell Rep. 22 (1) (2018) 8–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Berthiaume A-A, et al. , Pericyte structural remodeling in cerebrovascular health and homeostasis, Front. Aging Neurosci. 10 (2018) 210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Sá-Pereira I, Brsites D, Brito MA, Neurovascular unit: a focus on pericytes, Mol. Neurobiol. 45 (2012) 327–347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Attwell D, et al. , What is a pericyte? J. Cerebr. Blood Flow Metabol. 36 (2) (2016) 451–455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Hall CN, et al. , Capillary pericytes regulate cerebral blood flow in health and disease, Nature 508 (7494) (2014) 55–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Hamilton NB, Attwell D, Hall CN, Pericyte-mediated regulation of capillary diameter: a component of neurovascular coupling in health and disease, Front. Neuroenergetics 2 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Hartmann DA, et al. , Brain capillary pericytes exert a substantial but slow influence on blood flow, Nat. Neurosci. 24 (5) (2021) 633–645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Nikolakopoulou AM, et al. , Pericyte loss leads to circulatory failure and pleiotrophin depletion causing neuron loss, Nat. Neurosci. 22 (7) (2019) 1089–1098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Nortley R, et al. , Amyloid β oligomers constrict human capillaries in Alzheimer’s disease via signaling to pericytes, Science 365 (6450) (2019) eaav9518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Medina-Flores F, et al. , The active role of pericytes during neuroinflammation in the adult brain, Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 43 (2) (2023) 525–541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].van Splunder H, et al. , Pericytes in the disease spotlight, Trends Cell Biol. (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Zhang Y, et al. , Pericytes in Alzheimer’s disease: key players and therapeutic targets, Exp. Neurol. (2024) 114825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Brown LS, et al. , Pericytes and neurovascular function in the healthy and diseased brain, Front. Cell. Neurosci. 13 (2019) 282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Wu DM, et al. , Dopamine activates ATP-sensitive K+ currents in rat retinal pericytes, Vis. Neurosci. 18 (6) (2001) 935–940. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Berthiaume A-A, et al. , Pericyte remodeling is deficient in the aged brain and contributes to impaired capillary flow and structure, Nat. Commun. 13 (1) (2022) 5912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Ribatti D, Nico B, Crivellato E, The role of pericytes in angiogenesis, Int. J. Dev. Biol. 55 (3) (2011) 261–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Ravikumar M, et al. , The roles of blood-derived macrophages and resident microglia in the neuroinflammatory response to implanted intracortical microelectrodes, Biomaterials 35 (28) (2014) 8049–8064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Nirwane A, Yao Y, SMAlow/undetectable pericytes differentiate into microglia- and macrophage-like cells in ischemic brain, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 79 (5) (2022) 264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Huang W, et al. , Acute brain injuries trigger microglia as an additional source of the proteoglycan NG2, Acta neuropathologica communications 8 (1) (2020) 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Liu Y.-j., et al. , Cspg4high microglia contribute to microgliosis during neurodegeneration, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120 (8) (2023) e2210643120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Eles JR, Stieger KC, Kozai TD, The temporal pattern of intracortical microstimulation pulses elicits distinct temporal and spatial recruitment of cortical neuropil and neurons, J. Neural. Eng. 18 (1) (2021) 015001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Michelson NJ, et al. , Calcium activation of cortical neurons by continuous electrical stimulation: frequency dependence, temporal fidelity, and activation density, J. Neurosci. Res. 97 (5) (2019) 620–638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Stieger KC, et al. , Intracortical microstimulation pulse waveform and frequency recruits distinct spatiotemporal patterns of cortical neuron and neuropil activation, J. Neural. Eng. 19 (2) (2022) 026024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Suematsu N, Vazquez AL, Kozai TDY, Activation and depression of neural and hemodynamic responses induced by the intracortical microstimulation and visual stimulation in the mouse visual cortex, J. Neural. Eng (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Hughes C, Kozai T, Dynamic amplitude modulation of microstimulation evokes biomimetic onset and offset transients and reduces depression of evoked calcium responses in sensory cortices, Brain Stimul. 16 (3) (2023) 939–965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Zambach SA, et al. , Precapillary sphincters and pericytes at first-order capillaries as key regulators for brain capillary perfusion, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118 (26) (2021) e2023749118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Pulgar VM, Direct Electric Stimulation to Increase Cerebrovascular Function, Frontiers Media SA, 2015, p. 54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Wu DM, et al. , Electrotonic transmission within pericyte-containing retinal microvessels, Microcirculation 13 (5) (2006) 353–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Rouget C, Memoire sur le develloppment, la structure et les propietes physiologiques des capillaries senguins et lymphatiques, Arch. Physiol. Norm. Pathol (5) (1873) 603–663. [Google Scholar]
- [79].Dias Moura Prazeres PH, et al. , Pericytes are heterogeneous in their origin within the same tissue, Dev. Biol. 427 (1) (2017) 6–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Nielson CD, Shih AY, In vivo single cell optical ablation of brain pericytes, Front. Neurosci. 16 (2022) 900761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Damisah EC, et al. , A fluoro-Nissl dye identifies pericytes as distinct vascular mural cells during in vivo brain imaging, Nat. Neurosci. 20 (7) (2017) 1023–1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Zhu X, Bergles DE, Nishiyama A, NG2 cells generate both oligodendrocytes and gray matter astrocytes, Development 135 (1) (2008) 145–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Mishra A, et al. , Imaging pericytes and capillary diameter in brain slices and isolated retinae, Nat. Protoc. 9 (2) (2014) 323–336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Taupin P, BrdU immunohistochemistry for studying adult neurogenesis: paradigms, pitfalls, limitations, and validation, Brain Res. Rev. 53 (1) (2007) 198–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].McNamara IN, et al. , Electrode sharpness and insertion speed reduce tissue damage near high-density penetrating arrays, J. Neural. Eng. 21 (2) (2024) 026030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Li F, et al. , Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation (LIPUS) modulates microglial activation following intracortical microelectrode implantation, Nat. Comm. 15 (1) (2024) 5512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87].Chen K, et al. , Cell-specific alterations in autophagy-lysosomal activity near the chronically implanted microelectrodes, Biomaterials 302 (2023) 122316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88].Wellman SM, et al. , Aberrant accumulation of age-and disease-associated factors following neural probe implantation in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease, J. Neural. Eng. 20 (4) (2023) 046044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [89].Chen K, et al. , Neuronal functional connectivity is impaired in a layer dependent manner near chronically implanted intracortical microelectrodes in C57BL6 wildtype mice, J. Neural. Eng. 21 (3) (2024) 036033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on request.
