Abstract
Photon- and phonon-powered catalysis have emerged as a cornerstone of sustainable chemical synthesis, operating through diverse mechanisms that span the solar spectrum. This review provides a unified mechanistic overview of the three primary regimes of light-matter interaction in catalysis, focusing on their fundamental principles and latest achievements. This review first examines how high-energy photons generate charge carriers to drive solar fuel production. It then evaluates photothermal catalysis, where broad-spectrum light is converted into heat and excited carriers to power methane reforming and carbon dioxide hydrogenation. Finally, this review explores how infrared radiation can selectively vibrate specific molecular bonds for precise and stable chemical synthesis. This approach, known as thermal radiative catalysis, enables precise bond activation and high stability during alkane dehydrogenation. By bridging these three mechanisms, this review offers a clear guide for designing new catalytic systems that fully utilize the energy available from both light and heat.
Keywords: Photon- and Phonon-Powered Catalysis, Photocatalysis, Photothermal Catalysis, Thermal Radiative Catalysis, Mechanism, CO2 Hydrogenation, Alkane Dehydrogenation, Molecular Vibration Excitation


1. Introduction
The quest for sustainable chemical synthesis has driven the development of photon- and phonon-powered catalysis as a promising alternative to conventional thermocatalytic processes. Since the discovery of the Honda–Fujishima effect in 1972, light-powered catalysis has primarily evolved around the electronic excitation regime. Photocatalysis utilizes high-energy ultraviolet and visible (UV–vis) photons to generate electron–hole pairs in semiconductors. , These charge carriers provide the redox power needed for major achievements in water splitting and CO2 reduction, − while there is a large amount of energy in the infrared region that is also available for catalysis.
To use more of the solar spectrum, researchers have developed photothermal catalysis. This approach relies on the coupling and conversion between photon–electron–phonon. Photons are harvested to excite hot carriers, electrons promote the adsorption and activation of reactants, while phonons accumulate to elevate local temperature, thereby accelerating reaction kinetics. Recent achievements in this field have enabled breakthroughs in high-temperature dry reforming of methane (DRM) and CO2 hydrogenation. − By leveraging the localized hot spots generated on the surface of plasmonic, photothermal catalysis provides a robust pathway for utilizing the entire solar spectrum to drive reactions that would otherwise require significant fossil fuel-derived energy.
Beyond bulk heating, the vibrational excitation of molecules in the infrared region is an emerging frontier. Infrared photons possess energies that spectrally overlap with the vibrational absorption band (e.g., C–H and CO bonds absorption band). This allows for precise and selective bond activation, a mechanism exemplified by the recent paradigm of thermal radiative catalysis. By harvesting the intrinsic thermal radiation emitted from reactors through gaseous mediators such as CO2 and H2O, this strategy achieves superior yields and exceptional long-term stability in high-temperature alkane dehydrogenation. , This vibrational regime offers a unique way to control chemical pathways at the molecular level.
This review aims to establish a mechanistic framework for understanding photon- and phonon-powered catalysis by critically examining photocatalysis, photothermal catalysis, and thermal radiative catalysis (Figure ). Here, photon- and phonon-powered catalysis is discussed in a broad mechanistic sense, referring to catalytic processes in which electromagnetic radiation, either supplied externally or generated internally, participates as a key energy carrier in reactant activation. From this perspective, thermal radiative catalysis is included as a thermally powered but radiation-facilitated catalytic regime because internally generated MIR photons provide an additional pathway for molecular activation. By examining these three types of photon- and phonon-powered catalysis, this review shows how light interacts with matter in different ways and provides a guide for designing next-generation catalytic systems that use the full energy of light and heat. This unified understanding helps the chemical industry move toward a more efficient and sustainable future.
1.

Schematic representation of photon- and phonon-powered catalysis.
2. Photocatalysis
The development of photon- and phonon-powered catalysis has been historically synonymous with the generation and utilization of charge carriers in semiconductors. This regime, dominated by ultraviolet and visible photons, operates on the principle that light energy (hν) exceeding the semiconductor bandgap (Eg) can promote electrons from the valence band (VB) to the conduction band (CB), creating electron–hole pairs (Figure A). , These photogenerated charge carriers serve as the primary driving force for redox reactions, enabling chemical transformations that are unfavorable or slow under dark conditions. This section evaluates the fundamental mechanism of the electronic paradigm while highlighting the landmark achievements in solar fuel production.
2.

(A) Schematic representation of the typical photocatalytic process. Reproduced with permission from ref . Copyright 2019 John Wiley and Sons. (B) Time-scale dynamics of charge carrier generation, transport, and surface reactions in photocatalysis. (C) Time courses of the water-splitting reaction on a Cr2O3/Ru-modified SrTiO3: La, Rh/Au/BiVO4: Mo sheet under simulated sunlight. Reproduced with permission from ref . Copyright 2016 Springer Nature. (D) Temperature-dependent STH efficiency of the Rh/Cr2O3/Co3O4–InGaN/GaN NWs. (E) Stability test of the Rh/Cr2O3/Co3O4–InGaN/GaN NWs. Reproduced with permission from ref . Copyright 2023 Springer Nature. (F) Energy band position diagram of FeO x -ns and FeO x -nsl. (G) Comparison of photocatalytic activity for the first hour of catalysts. (H) Electron-based selectivity and product-based selectivity of catalysts. Reproduced with permission from ref . Copyright 2026 American Chemical Society.
2.1. Fundamental Mechanism
The photocatalytic process under UV–vis irradiation can be understood as a sequential chain of charge generation, separation, migration, and surface reaction. When an incident photon possesses energy that exceeds the bandgap, it promotes an electron from the valence band to the conduction band, which generates an electron–hole pair on an ultrafast femtosecond time scale. , This electronic excitation initiates a competition between charge utilization and nonradiative energy loss. Within a few picoseconds, photogenerated carriers typically lose their excess kinetic energy to the lattice through phonon emission or undergo rapid bulk recombination, which is often considered the primary loss for overall quantum efficiency. To drive reactions, these charge carriers must successfully migrate to the catalyst surface before they recombine. Oxidation occurs when holes extract electrons from molecules on the surface; reduction happens when electrons are transferred to reactants. Because these surface charge transfer events usually take place on nanosecond to microsecond time scales, they must outcompete the much faster recombination processes for the reaction to be successful (Figure B). The efficiency of photocatalysis is strongly governed by the structure–function relationship of the semiconductor and its surface active sites. Researchers improve photocatalytic performance by controlling material crystallinity and adding cocatalysts. − These strategies help separate charges and extend the lifetime of the reactive species.
2.2. Applications
The electronic excitation regime has enabled a decade of transformative progress in harnessing solar energy for chemical synthesis. By using the high redox power of photogenerated carriers, researchers have reached major milestones that offer both scientific value and practical benefits for the chemical industry. Key examples include water splitting, pollutant degradation, − and CO2 hydrogenation. − In photocatalysis, the practical catalytic effect is commonly evaluated by quantum efficiency, product selectivity, and long-term stability. These metrics directly reflect how efficiently photogenerated charge carriers are converted into chemical products.
2.2.1. Water Splitting
One of the most celebrated achievements in this regime is the realization of overall water splitting, which produces clean hydrogen fuel. Recent breakthroughs have seen the development of semiconductor systems and Z-scheme heterojunctions that can achieve high solar-to-hydrogen (STH) conversion efficiencies. For instance, the engineering of high-quality crystalline materials such as gallium-doped zinc oxide or aluminum-doped strontium titanate has demonstrated the ability to catalyze the simultaneous evolution of H2 and O2 under visible light (Figure C). , These systems offer a practical way to store solar energy as chemical energy. A landmark achievement was reported by Zhou and coworkers, where an STH efficiency of 9.2% was realized using an InGaN/GaN nanowire photocatalyst under concentrated solar illumination (Figure D–E). This represents a significant milestone for photocatalytic systems that operate without external power, because it addresses the rapid recombination of carriers. This progress shows that better materials and reaction settings can bring these systems closer to practical use.
2.2.2. CO2 Hydrogenation
Photocatalysis has also made remarkable progress in the conversion of greenhouse gases to sustainable fuels and feedstocks. By tuning the conduction band positions and surface active sites of catalysts, it is now possible to selectively reduce CO2 to a variety of products, including carbon monoxide, methane, methanol, and multicarbon products. Recent research has focused on the use of single-atom catalysts and surface-engineered metal oxides to enhance multielectron transfer processes. These advancements have enabled high-selectivity CO2 conversion under ambient conditions, which is a critical requirement for a future circular carbon economy.
Cheng et al. recently reported a breakthrough in making multicarbon fuels from CO2 using unique amorphous FeO x nanosheets. This catalyst uses structural and electronic synergy to improve performance. The amorphous framework provides many disordered sites that improve molecule adsorption. At the same time, the mesoporous structure shortens the distance that charges must travel to reach the surface. Furthermore, the integration of laser-induced oxygen vacancies was found to increase the Fe2+/Fe3+ ratio, establishing a tandem catalytic pathway whereby Fe3+ sites facilitate CO2 activation and Fe2+ sites effectively stabilize *OCCO intermediates to promote C–C coupling. This design led to an efficiency of 1.60% at 520 nm and a high ethane selectivity of 94% (Figure F–H). This example illustrates that photocatalytic performance should be assessed not only by conversion efficiency but also by product selectivity, because charge-transfer pathways and surface intermediate stabilization strongly determine the final product distribution.
2.2.3. Organic Synthesis
Beyond energy conversion, photocatalysis has also changed the field of organic synthesis. By utilizing mild visible light and photoredox catalysts, chemists can generate highly reactive radical intermediates that enable challenging transformations, such as C–H activation and cross-coupling. This approach allows for the construction of complex molecular architectures with high efficiency and reduced reliance on toxic reagents. Driving these reactions with photons instead of high heat provides great precision. For instance, the implementation of photocatalytic sequential electron/proton transfer has enabled the direct generation of high-energy nitrogen-centered radicals from free N–H bonds, allowing for the site-selective functionalization of unactivated C(sp3)–H centers in pharmaceuticals and natural products. Additionally, controlling the speed of charge carriers in nickel catalysis has fixed common issues in C–N cross-coupling. This allows for the successful reaction of difficult molecules while keeping the catalyst stable.
In summary, photocatalysis is a powerful way to drive chemical reactions by using light. It has enabled important progress in the production of solar fuels and the synthesis of precise organic molecules under mild conditions. However, this approach uses only high-energy photons, which leaves a large part of infrared unused. Challenges such as material stability and energy loss through carrier recombination also limit overall efficiency. − These factors provide a strong motivation to explore photothermal catalysis discussed in the following sections.
3. Photothermal Catalysis
The solar spectrum at the Earth’s surface contains only approximately 5% UV light and 45% visible light, with the remaining roughly 50% residing in the infrared region (Figure A). The need to use more of the solar spectrum has led to the development of photothermal catalysis. Photothermal catalysis captures light from ultraviolet to infrared wavelengths to synergistically drive both photochemical and thermochemical processes. As shown in the energy diagram, the thermochemical effect converts light into heat to raise the energy level of the reactants. Simultaneously, the photochemical effect lowers the activation energy barrier by creating excited states (Figure B).
3.

(A) Spectral irradiance of solar spectrum. (B) Photothermal pathway reduces the activation energy barrier in catalytic reactions. Reproduced with permission from ref . Copyright 2025 Royal Society of Chemistry. (C) Photothermal DRM performance for Ni@TS-1. (D) Stability test for Ni@TS-1 in a flow reactor with light irradiation for 300 h. Reproduced with permission from ref . Copyright 2025 Elsevier. (E) Schematic of the nanoscale greenhouse effect in Ni@p-SiO2. (F) Estimated Tlocal of different catalysts under different illuminations. (G) CO2 conversion rate of different Ni catalysts for photothermal hydrogenation of CO2 under different intensities of light. Reproduced with permission from ref . Copyright 2021 Springer Nature. (H) Methanol rate of black indium and (I) the corresponding Arrhenius plot. Reproduced with permission under Creative Commons License (CC BY 4.0) from ref . Copyright 2022 Springer Nature.
3.1. Fundamental Mechanism
As described in photocatalysis, high-energy photons generate charge carriers that reduce the activation barrier of a reaction. These photogenerated carriers also influence the electronic environment on the catalyst surface. This process may modify the surface acidity and basicity to enhance the adsorption and activation of reactant molecules. For example, the accumulation of electrons can create more basic sites that improve the binding of acidic molecules such as CO2. ,
The conversion of full-spectrum light into thermal energy follows direct and indirect pathways, depending on the catalyst structure. The direct pathway involves the absorption of light, where light energy is transformed immediately into lattice heat. Indirect conversion occurs in two main ways. In metallic nanostructures, plasmonically localized heating is triggered when incident light causes conduction electrons to oscillate together. This energy quickly turns into heat through electron–phonon scattering within the metal lattice. In semiconductor catalysts, heat is generated when charge carriers lose their energy through nonradiative relaxation and recombination. This includes both high-energy carriers dropping back to lower energy levels and electron–hole pairs recombining. These events release energy into the lattice as heat, which causes a temperature increase that speeds up reaction kinetics. These mechanisms enable transformative applications in synthesis, allowing the use of the entire solar spectrum for sustainable chemistry.
3.2. Applications
Photothermal catalysis has demonstrated remarkable success in driving reactions that typically require high temperatures, effectively using solar energy to replace fossil-fuel-derived heat. For photothermal catalysis, the catalytic effect is usually reflected by rate or conversion enhancement under irradiation compared to dark thermal controls, changes in apparent activation energy, improved selectivity, and stability under continuous light irradiation. These metrics are essential for evaluating whether light provides only heat or also introduces additional photoinduced effects.
3.2.1. Dry Reforming of Methane
Photothermal catalysis has led to major breakthroughs in the DRM. This process converts methane and carbon dioxide into syngas. While this reaction normally requires very high heat, light energy can make the process more efficient at lower temperatures. Improving the electronic properties of catalysts is one successful approach for this reaction. Zhang et al. showed that doping nickel with yttrium can significantly boost the performance. Yttrium transfers electrons to the nickel to keep it in a metallic state. This helps the catalyst activate methane more easily and doubles the production rate of the carbon monoxide. Wang et al. designed a catalyst by placing nickel particles inside a TS-1 zeolite matrix. The zeolite framework acts as a thermal block that prevents heat from escaping. This method achieved a conversion rate that was 300% higher than that of traditional thermodynamic limits (Figure C). The light also helped to block the unwanted side reactions. This resulted in a high-quality syngas mixture with a near-ideal hydrogen-to-carbon monoxide ratio that remained stable for 300 h (Figure D). The enhanced conversion rate and long-term stability demonstrate how photothermal heat management can be translated into practical catalytic improvements in high-temperature reforming reactions.
3.2.2. CO2 Hydrogenation
Photothermal systems have achieved high conversion rates for CO2 methanation and reverse water–gas shift (RWGS) reactions. ,− Guo et al. utilized narrow-band gap CuInS2 thin films to demonstrate the efficacy of NIR-driven CO2 hydrogenation. The catalyst effectively converts NIR photons into heat, leading to a significantly higher reaction rate than that achieved under UV–visible light alone. Inspired by the greenhouse effect, Cai et al. developed a supra-photothermal Ni@p-SiO2 catalyst where a nickel core serves as the light absorber and a nanoporous silica shell traps IR radiation (Figure E). This unique structure acts as a radiative barrier that reduces thermal energy loss and raises the local temperature of the Ni particles significantly above that of nonencapsulated catalysts (Figure F). This intense localized heating provides the necessary energy to drive high-rate CO2 conversion with an improved selectivity (Figure G). This work demonstrates that engineering a microgreenhouse environment at the catalyst level can maximize the utilization of full-spectrum light for solar-fuel synthesis.
Photothermal catalysis often shows a synergy between the light and heat effects. A clear example of this is seen in the synthesis of methanol over black indium oxide. Kinetic studies using Arrhenius plots are used to separate these two contributions. At lower temperatures, the activation energy for methanol synthesis remains similar under both light and dark conditions. This suggests that the reaction follows the same mechanism and that light primarily acts as a heat source. However, at higher temperatures, a distinct change occurred. While the energy barrier drops under dark conditions due to a shift in the reaction pathway, it decreases even further when light is applied (Figure H–I). This reduction happens because light helps reaction intermediates to move more easily between active surface sites. These kinetic results provide strong evidence of a photochemical process that works together with heat to improve the reaction performance.
In summary, photothermal catalysis offers a robust way to harness the full solar spectrum by integrating photochemical and photothermal effects. The photochemical contribution involves high-energy photons exciting charge carriers for direct redox reactions and surface basicity modulation, which facilitate molecular adsorption and activation. Meanwhile, the photothermal effect originates from broad-spectrum absorption that dissipates into phonons for bulk heating. This approach powers energy-intensive reactions such as methane reforming and CO2 reduction under much milder conditions. Recent breakthroughs show that managing light and heat together can break thermodynamic limits and keep catalysts stable for long-term use. Despite these advances, several challenges remain in the field of photothermal catalysis. The local temperature of active sites is difficult to determine accurately, and the contributions of hot carriers, surface electronic modulation, and local heating are often intertwined. Standardized activity metrics are also needed because performance depends strongly on light intensity, catalyst loading, and heat dissipation. In addition, catalyst stability under intense irradiation and temperature gradients should be carefully evaluated.
4. Thermal Radiative Catalysis
The IR region provides a distinct mechanism through the direct resonant excitation of molecular vibrations. Infrared photons have energies that match the vibrational frequencies of specific chemical bonds. Vibrational excitation targets specific molecular modes. This selective action weakens intended chemical bonds and reduces the energy required for the reaction. On the basis of these physical insights, our group recently proposed and demonstrated thermal radiative catalysis (TRC) as a novel catalytic strategy. , This approach uses the thermal radiation emitted by the reactors to promote chemical reactions.
4.1. Fundamental Mechanism
The core principle of thermal radiative catalysis is the resonance between incident photons and specific vibration modes of molecules. When a molecule absorbs an IR photon, it transitions from the ground vibrational state to an excited state. This population of excited vibrational states alters the potential energy surface of the molecule, effectively elongating specific bonds and reducing the energy required for their dissociation. In traditional liquid/gas-phase chemistry, this concept was explored using high-intensity, tunable IR lasers to achieve “mode-selective chemistry”. , Seminal work by Crim and others demonstrated that exciting specific C–H or O–H stretches could enhance reaction rates by orders of magnitude compared to thermal equilibrium conditions. , However, these laser-driven approaches were limited by the high cost, low power, and narrow bandwidth of available sources, making them impractical for large-scale catalysis.
TRC differs from conventional photocatalysis and photothermal catalysis because its radiation is generated internally from a high-temperature reactor rather than supplied by an external light source. Therefore, heat remains the primary energy input in TRC. Nevertheless, the reactor-emitted MIR radiation can act as an additional driving force when it spectrally overlaps with molecular vibrational absorption bands. The use of intrinsic thermal radiation instead of external lasers is a major breakthrough. This shift provides a constant and low-cost light source for chemical reactions. It makes the vibrational activation mechanism practical for large-scale industrial use. According to Planck’s law, any object at a temperature T emits blackbody radiation with a spectral distribution peaking at λmax ≈ 2898/T (μm·K). For a typical catalytic reactor operating at 500–800 °C (773–1073 K), the peak emission falls squarely in the MIR region, perfectly overlapping with the vibrational fingerprints of many key reactants and mediators. This suggests that the heat already applied to drive thermocatalysis inherently generates a flux of IR photons capable of driving vibrational excitation. By utilizing the heat already present in the reactor, this method significantly improves energy efficiency.
4.2. Applications
A key innovation of TRC is the use of gaseous catalystsmolecules with large IR absorption cross sections that act as “thermal radiation antennas” to harvest thermal radiation and transfer energy to reactants via inelastic collisions. Unlike solid catalysts, these mediators do not suffer from coking, sintering, or leaching, offering exceptional stability. Two main gaseous catalysts (CO2 and H2O) have been used to demonstrate this strategy. In TRC, the catalytic contribution of thermal radiation is commonly evaluated by comparing radiative systems with radiation-shielded or mediator-free controls. Key performance indicators include conversion, product yield, product selectivity, and long-term stability. These comparisons are important for establishing whether reactor-emitted MIR radiation contributes to reaction enhancement beyond conventional thermal effects.
4.2.1. CO2-Catalyzed Ethane Dehydrogenation
In this system, CO2 acts as the vibrational energy harvester. The asymmetric stretching mode of CO2 matches the thermal emission spectrum of a reactor at 600 °C. When CO2 absorbs these photons, it enters an excited vibrational state. These excited molecules then collide with ethane (C2H6) to weaken its C–H bonds and help remove hydrogen atoms (Figure A, B). Experiments were conducted in a quartz tube to allow radiation and a steel tube to block it. The introduction of CO2 under radiation led to a 120% increase in C2H4 yield compared to the shielded control (Figure C). C2H4 selectivity remained very high at 99.26%. This result indicates that vibrational excitation specifically targets C–H bonds and prevents unwanted C–C cracking. Removing the steel tube lowered the activation barrier by 14 kJ/mol (Figure D). This proves that CO2 works as a catalyst through thermal radiation. Computer simulations also revealed that excited CO2 reduces the energy threshold for bond breaking by more than 1 eV. This increases the reaction probability by over 10 orders of magnitude (Figure E).
4.

(A) Schematic diagram of carbon dioxide enabling thermal radiative catalytic ethane dehydrogenation. (B) Theoretical blackbody radiation intensity spectra and the major IR absorption of different molecules. (C) Rate of C2H4 in C2H6/Ar and C2H6/CO2 systems. (D) Arrhenius plot of C2H6/CO2 and C2H6/Ar systems. (E) Potential energy surface of CO2 + H + C2H5 with vibrational quantum number v1 = v2 = 0 and v1 = v2 = 2. Reproduced with permission from ref . Copyright 2023 Elsevier. (F) Schematic diagram of catalytic propane conversion with water molecules. (G) Catalytic performance for different systems. (H) The 3D structure of the in situ synchrotron radiation photoionization mass spectrometry. (I) The relative abundance of methyl radical, ethyl radical, and propyl radicals in the cases of C3H8 and C3H8/H2O. (J) The proposed reaction pathway. Reproduced with permission from ref . Copyright 2025 John Wiley and Sons.
4.2.2. H2O-Catalyzed Propane Dehydrogenation
Similarly, water vapor (H2O) serves as an efficient mediator for propane (C3H8) dehydrogenation (Figure F). Thermal radiation excites the vibrational modes of water to generate reactive hydroxyl radicals (OH∗). These radicals abstract hydrogen atoms from propane more efficiently than heat alone. This process shifts the reaction pathway from difficult C–C bond scission to more favorable C–H bond cleavage. Using trace amounts of water under radiation achieved a propane conversion of 51.14% and an olefin yield of 37.93% (Figure G). This performance significantly outperformed systems without radiation or without water. The system was highly stable and worked for more than 2000 h without deactivation. This is a major advantage over solid catalysts that often fail within hours due to carbon buildup. Kinetic studies and isotopic labeling using D2O and C3D8 confirmed that O–H and C–H bond breaking are the key steps. In situ synchrotron PI-MS results also showed fewer methyl and ethyl radicals but more propyl radicals (Figure H–J). This evidence confirms the shift in the reaction mechanism.
In summary, thermal radiative catalysis offers a highly selective pathway for chemical synthesis. This approach turns the internal thermal radiation of a reactor into precise catalytic power. By using gaseous mediators instead of solid catalysts, this method avoids common issues, such as deactivation and carbon deposition. Recent studies of carbon dioxide and water show that this strategy can significantly lower reaction barriers and improve product yields. This paradigm provides a practical way to harness thermal radiation for energy-efficient industrial processes. Although TRC provides a promising route to utilizing reactor-emitted thermal radiation, it is still an emerging field. Its key challenges include the limited selectivity of broadband MIR radiation, the difficulty of quantifying vibrational excitation under working conditions, and the strong influence of reactor geometry and radiation transport. In addition, its applicability beyond alkane dehydrogenation remains to be explored.
5. Summary and Outlook
This review summarizes three representative catalytic regimes of photon- and phonon-powered catalysis by analyzing light-matter interactions across the light spectrum. To better connect these mechanistic regimes with their practical catalytic consequences, we further compare their energy sources, representative reactions, quantifiable performance metrics, advantages, and remaining challenges, as shown in Table . Photocatalysis uses high-energy photons to create charge carriers for redox reactions in solar fuel production. Photothermal catalysis integrates heat generation with electronic excitation to accelerate the kinetics and lower reaction barriers. Thermal radiative catalysis utilizes infrared radiation to excite specific molecular vibrations for precise and stable bond activation. This framework shows that photon- and phonon-powered catalysis is a versatile approach, where each mechanism targets a specific electronic state or chemical bond within a molecule. These strategies together allow for a more efficient and controlled approach to the chemical synthesis.
1. Comparison of Photocatalysis, Photothermal Catalysis, and Thermal Radiative Catalysis.
| Catalytic regime | Photocatalysis | Photothermal catalysis | Thermal radiative catalysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy carriers | Photon | Photon and phonon | Photon and phonon |
| Typical catalysts | Heterojunctions | Plasmonic metals; semiconductors | IR-active gaseous molecules |
| Representative reactions | Water splitting; CO2 reduction | CO2 hydrogenation; dry reforming of methane | Alkane dehydrogenation |
| Quantifiable metric | Quantum efficiency | Rate and conversion | Yield and conversion |
| Advantages | Mild conditions; direct solar-to-chemical conversion | Broad spectral utilization; accelerated thermal reactions | Intrinsic radiation utilization; avoids catalyst deactivation |
| Challenges | Charge recombination | Local-temperature measurement; stability under irradiation | Broadband radiation, quantitative radiation intensity |
Despite the important progress, several challenges remain. For photocatalysis, improving charge separation, suppressing recombination, and enhancing the long-term stability remain central tasks. For photothermal catalysis, accurately determining the real temperature of active sites is still difficult, and distinguishing photochemical effects from local heating requires rigorous control experiments. For TRC, the broadband nature of reactor-emitted MIR radiation limits strict mode selectivity, and the quantitative contribution of vibrational excitation remains unclear. Reactor geometry, gas composition, wall emissivity, and radiation transport should be considered when evaluating the TRC performance.
Future progress will depend on the successful coupling of these different mechanisms into integrated systems. Researchers can focus on the synergy between photons and phonons. For example, localized heat can speed up the movement of intermediates, while excited electronic states drive precise bond-forming steps. The reactor design must also evolve to manage both light absorption and internal thermal radiation effectively. In addition, the rational design of spectrally selective radiative thermal emitters represents an important future direction for TRCs. Future progress will require the integration of advanced characterization, kinetic analysis, and theoretical modeling. In situ and operando spectroscopic techniques will be important for disentangling electronic, thermal, and vibrational contributions in real-time. Advanced theoretical tools will be essential to track how energy flows across different molecular states in real time. By bridging electronic, thermal, and vibrational effects, the next generation of catalytic systems will reach higher levels of efficiency and selectivity. This transition toward spectrum-aware catalysis offers a practical way to achieve sustainable chemical synthesis and a carbon-neutral future.
Acknowledgments
The authors appreciate support from the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFF0502000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52102311), the Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Department (2025A0505000043), the Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Aggregate Science, the Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (KCXFZ20240903093459001 and JSGGKQTD20221101115701006), the Provincial Talent Plan (2023TB0006), and the Shenzhen Natural Science Foundation (2022).
The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript. CRediT: J.W. data curation, visualization, writingoriginal draft, writingreview and editing; L.W. conceptualization, supervision, visualization, writingreview and editing.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Published as part of ACS Nanoscience Au special issue “2026 Rising Stars in Nanoscience”.
References
- Fujishima A., Honda K.. Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. Nature. 1972;238(5358):37–38. doi: 10.1038/238037a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen X., Shen S., Guo L., Mao S. S.. Semiconductor-based Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation. Chem. Rev. 2010;110(11):6503–6570. doi: 10.1021/cr1001645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis N. S., Nocera D. G.. Powering the planet: Chemical challenges in solar energy utilization. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006;103(43):15729–15735. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603395103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kudo A., Miseki Y.. Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009;38(1):253–278. doi: 10.1039/B800489G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang G., Li G., Lan Z.-A., Lin L., Savateev A., Heil T., Zafeiratos S., Wang X., Antonietti M.. Optimizing Optical Absorption, Exciton Dissociation, and Charge Transfer of a Polymeric Carbon Nitride with Ultrahigh Solar Hydrogen Production Activity. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017;56(43):13445–13449. doi: 10.1002/anie.201706870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J., Xu J., Zhang Z., Chen Z., Liu K., Rao C., Men Y., Li M., Lai J., Sun L.. et al. Nanoscale-heat-management-enhanced photothermal methane dry reforming with carbon dioxide. Chem. Catal. 2025;5(10):101437. doi: 10.1016/j.checat.2025.101437. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lu Z., Liu W., Zhang Z., Chen Z., Sun J., Gao W., Zhuo X., Tu W., Hu G., Yao Y.. et al. Alkylsilane-extended hydrogen migration enhanced photothermal Sabatier reaction. Nat. Commun. 2026;17(1):3592. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-70109-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu J., Xie B., Zhang Z., Lu Z., Yan X., Meng N., Zhou X., Liu K., Rao C., Hu G.. et al. Hydride Vacancy–Driven Photothermal C–H Activation over Ni/TiH2 Catalysts. ACS Catal. 2026;16(9):8669–8681. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6c01215. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Stensitzki T., Yang Y., Kozich V., Ahmed A. A., Kössl F., Kühn O., Heyne K.. Acceleration of a ground-state reaction by selective femtosecond-infrared-laser-pulse excitation. Nat. Chem. 2018;10(2):126–131. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ding X., Zhang Z., Sun J., Loh J. Y., Ji D., Lu J., Liu C., Zhao L., Liu W., Zhao J.. et al. Thermal radiative catalysis: Selective dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene by vibrationally excited carbon dioxide. Joule. 2023;7(10):2318–2334. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2023.08.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ding X., Zheng Z., Liu C., Sun J., Zhang Y., Huang C., Tu W., Zhao L., Hu Z., Zou Z.. Stefan-Boltzmann Water Catalyzed Propane Dehydrogenation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025;64(20):e202424800. doi: 10.1002/anie.202424800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoffmann M. R., Martin S. T., Choi W., Bahnemann D. W.. Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 1995;95(1):69–96. doi: 10.1021/cr00033a004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fox M. A., Dulay M. T.. Heterogeneous photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 1993;93(1):341–357. doi: 10.1021/cr00017a016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng L., Xiang Q., Liao Y., Zhang H.. CdS-based photocatalysts. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018;11(6):1362–1391. doi: 10.1039/C7EE03640J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hao S., Kuang M., Zheng G.. Phase-Engineered Catalysts for Photocatalytic Conversion of C1Molecules. Adv. Mater. 2026;(n/a):e19450. doi: 10.1002/adma.202519450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang F., Jiang Y., Liu J., Jiang A., Cao Y., Yu S., Zheng K., Zhou Y.. Exploration of ultrafast dynamic processes in photocatalysis: Advances and challenges. Fundam. Res. 2025;5(6):2838–2849. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2024.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sachs M., Harnett-Caulfield L., Pastor E., Davies B., Sowood D. J. C., Moss B., Kafizas A., Nelson J., Walsh A., Durrant J. R.. Metal-centred states control carrier lifetimes in transition metal oxide photocatalysts. Nat. Chem. 2025;17(9):1348–1355. doi: 10.1038/s41557-025-01868-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Serpone N., Lawless D., Khairutdinov R., Pelizzetti E.. Subnanosecond relaxation dynamics in TiO2 colloidal sols (particle sizes Rp= 1.0–13.4 nm). Relevance to heterogeneous photocatalysis. J. Phys. Chem. C. 1995;99(45):16655–16661. doi: 10.1021/j100045a027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hisatomi T., Takanabe K., Domen K.. Photocatalytic Water-Splitting Reaction from Catalytic and Kinetic Perspectives. Catal. Lett. 2015;145(1):95–108. doi: 10.1007/s10562-014-1397-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hisatomi T., Kubota J., Domen K.. Recent advances in semiconductors for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43(22):7520–7535. doi: 10.1039/C3CS60378D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ali A., Khan A. A., Ahmad I., Shahid I.. Strategic advances in perovskite oxide photocatalysts for efficient CO2 reduction: Challenges and future outlook. Mater. Today. 2026;92:857–905. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2025.12.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang L., Xu X., Cheng Q., Dou S. X., Du Y.. Near-infrared-driven photocatalysts: Design, construction, and applications. Small. 2021;17(9):1904107. doi: 10.1002/smll.201904107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Q., Hisatomi T., Jia Q., Tokudome H., Zhong M., Wang C., Pan Z., Takata T., Nakabayashi M., Shibata N.. et al. Scalable water splitting on particulate photocatalyst sheets with a solar-to-hydrogen energy conversion efficiency exceeding 1% Nat. Mater. 2016;15(6):611–615. doi: 10.1038/nmat4589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou P., Navid I. A., Ma Y., Xiao Y., Wang P., Ye Z., Zhou B., Sun K., Mi Z.. Solar-to-hydrogen efficiency of more than 9% in photocatalytic water splitting. Nature. 2023;613(7942):66–70. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05399-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng T., Lin W., Wang Y., Zhang Y., Yang Y., Yang X., Wang B., Li Q., Wang J., Zhou Y.. et al. Design of Unique Amorphous FeOx Mesoporous Nanosheets for Structural–Electronic Synergy toward Highly Selective and Efficient CO2 Photoconversion into Multicarbon Fuels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2026;148(14):15166–15172. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6c01273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koe W. S., Lee J. W., Chong W. C., Pang Y. L., Sim L. C.. An overview of photocatalytic degradation: photocatalysts, mechanisms, and development of photocatalytic membrane. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020;27(3):2522–2565. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07193-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nie Y.-C., Yu F., Wang L.-C., Xing Q.-J., Liu X., Pei Y., Zou J.-P., Dai W.-L., Li Y., Suib S. L.. Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants coupled with simultaneous photocatalytic H2 evolution over graphene quantum dots/Mn-N-TiO2/g-C3N4 composite catalysts: Performance and mechanism. Appl. Catal., B. 2018;227:312–321. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.01.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Peng X., Pang H., Feng N., Huang D., Jiao C., Zeng J., Xiang Y., Chen Y.. Methylation-Induced Permanent Charge Polarization in Covalent Organic Frameworks for Visible Light-Driven Water Decontamination and Disinfection. Adv. Sci. 2026;13:e20563. doi: 10.1002/advs.202520563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duan C., Liu J., Li Z., Shi R., Zhao J., Waterhouse G. I. N., Wen X.-D., Zhang L.-P., Wu L.-Z., Zhang T.. Efficient Photocatalytic Propane Direct Dehydrogenation to Propylene Over PtO2 Clusters. Adv. Mater. 2025;37(8):2411648. doi: 10.1002/adma.202411648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fang S., Rahaman M., Bharti J., Reisner E., Robert M., Ozin G. A., Hu Y. H.. Photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers. 2023;3(1):61. doi: 10.1038/s43586-023-00243-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tan Y., Sun R., Xu H., Yuan Y., Liu X., Wheatley A. E. H., Zhang R.. Boron-induced spin-polarized defect complexes towards efficient photocatalytic tetracycline decomposition and CO2 conversion. Appl. Catal., B. 2026;386:126358. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.126358. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lee D. K., Choi J. I., Lee G. H., Kim Y. H., Kang J. K.. Energy States of a Core-Shell Metal Oxide Photocatalyst Enabling Visible Light Absorption and Utilization in Solar-to-Fuel Conversion of Carbon Dioxide. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016;6(14):1600583. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201600583. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lin Z., Yang Z., Wang J., Feng J., Jiang J., Jian J., Liu C., Huang H., Zhu B., Zou Z.. et al. Targeted Formation of Bidentate Carbonates at Alkaline Sites for Efficient CO2 Photomethanation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2026;65(14):e24978. doi: 10.1002/anie.202524978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takata T., Jiang J., Sakata Y., Nakabayashi M., Shibata N., Nandal V., Seki K., Hisatomi T., Domen K.. Photocatalytic water splitting with a quantum efficiency of almost unity. Nature. 2020;581(7809):411–414. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2278-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fu J., Jiang K., Qiu X., Yu J., Liu M.. Product selectivity of photocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions. Mater. Today. 2020;32:222–243. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.06.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sun J., Lian G., Chen Z., Zou Z., Wang L.. Merger of Single-Atom Catalysis and Photothermal Catalysis for Future Chemical Production. ACS Nano. 2024;18(51):34572–34595. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c13030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corrigan N., Shanmugam S., Xu J., Boyer C.. Photocatalysis in organic and polymer synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016;45(22):6165–6212. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00185H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang C., Chen Z., Sun J., Tong L., Wang W., Song S., Li J.. Sulfonamide-directed site-selective functionalization of unactivated C(sp3)–H enabled by photocatalytic sequential electron/proton transfer. Nat. Commun. 2024;15(1):5087. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49337-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gisbertz S., Reischauer S., Pieber B.. Overcoming limitations in dual photoredox/nickel-catalysed C–N cross-couplings due to catalyst deactivation. Nat. Catal. 2020;3(8):611–620. doi: 10.1038/s41929-020-0473-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hassaan M. A., El-Nemr M. A., Elkatory M. R., Ragab S., Niculescu V.-C., El Nemr A.. Principles of Photocatalysts and Their Different Applications: A Review. Top. Curr. Chem. 2023;381(6):31. doi: 10.1007/s41061-023-00444-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang S., Che W., Shao Y., Byun W. J., Li X., Jiao X., Li R., Lee J. S., Xu J., Baek J.-B.. Advancements and prospects of near-infrared-light driven CO2 reduction reaction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2025;54(15):7174–7215. doi: 10.1039/D4CS00721B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weng B., Qi M.-Y., Han C., Tang Z.-R., Xu Y.-J.. Photocorrosion Inhibition of Semiconductor-Based Photocatalysts: Basic Principle, Current Development, and Future Perspective. ACS Catal. 2019;9(5):4642–4687. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b00313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Song C., Wang Z., Yin Z., Xiao D., Ma D.. Principles and applications of photothermal catalysis. Chem. Catal. 2022;2(1):52–83. doi: 10.1016/j.checat.2021.10.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liao C., He Z., Wang F., Liu Y., Guo L.. Anti-Site Defect-Induced Cascaded Sub-Band Transition in CuInS2 Enables Infrared Light-Driven CO2 Reduction. ACS Nano. 2024;18(52):35480–35489. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c12832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo H., Weng B., Liu Y., Hu J., Dewil R., Meng S.. Synergistic internal electric field and Lewis acid–base dual sites for simultaneous CO2 photoreduction and phenylcarbinol oxidation. Chem. Eng. J. 2026;545:178287. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2026.178287. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang X., Zhang Z., Wang Q., Xu J., Han X., Wang J., Liu J., Rao C., Yang X., Zhang Y., Wang L.. Enhanced photothermal methane dry reforming through electronic interactions between nickel and yttrium. Nanoscale Horiz. 2025;10(5):905–914. doi: 10.1039/D5NH00013K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang X., Li X., Zhang D., Su N. Q., Yang W., Everitt H. O., Liu J.. Product selectivity in plasmonic photocatalysis for carbon dioxide hydrogenation. Nat. Commun. 2017;8(1):14542. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cai M., Wu Z., Li Z., Wang L., Sun W., Tountas A. A., Li C., Wang S., Feng K., Xu A.-B.. et al. Greenhouse-inspired supra-photothermal CO2 catalysis. Nat. Energy. 2021;6(8):807–814. doi: 10.1038/s41560-021-00867-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Z., Mao C., Meira D. M., Duchesne P. N., Tountas A. A., Li Z., Qiu C., Tang S., Song R., Ding X.. et al. New black indium oxidetandem photothermal CO2-H2 methanol selective catalyst. Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):1512. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29222-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun J., Gao W., Ding X., Lu Z., Li H., Zhang M., Tu W., Chen Z., Zhou Y., Yao W.. et al. Inherent lunar water enabled photothermal CO2 catalysis. Joule. 2025;9(7):102006. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2025.102006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang L., Dong Y., Yan T., Hu Z., Ali F. M., Meira D. M., Duchesne P. N., Loh J. Y. Y., Qiu C., Storey E. E.. et al. Black indium oxide a photothermal CO2 hydrogenation catalyst. Nat. Commun. 2020;11(1):2432. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16336-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gu Y., Zhao E.-D., Wan X., Ma J., Liu D., Xiong Y.. Reaction-Induced Phase Engineering of CuCo Nanoparticles for Enhanced Photothermal CO2 Hydrogenation. Adv. Mater. 2026;38(4):e15661. doi: 10.1002/adma.202515661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Du K., Guo J., Song C., Liu X., Chen M., Yuan D., Ye R., San X., Li Y., Ye J.. Persistent photothermal CO2 methanation without external energy input. Energy Environ. Sci. 2025;18(3):1255–1261. doi: 10.1039/D4EE04849K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson H. W.. Infra-Red and Raman Spectra of Polyatomic Molecules. Nature. 1946;158(4009):289–289. doi: 10.1038/158289a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li T. E., Nitzan A., Subotnik J. E.. Energy-efficient pathway for selectively exciting solute molecules to high vibrational states via solvent vibration-polariton pumping. Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):4203. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31703-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ellerbrock R., Zhao B., Manthe U.. Vibrational control of the reaction pathway in the H + CHD3→H2 + CD3 reaction. Sci. Adv. 2022;8(13):eabm9820. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm9820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crim F. F.. Vibrational State Control of Bimolecular Reactions: Discovering and Directing the Chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999;32(10):877–884. doi: 10.1021/ar950046a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Edmonds I.. Stephan-Boltzmann law in the laboratory. Am. J. Phys. 1968;36(9):845–846. doi: 10.1119/1.1975165. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
