Skip to main content
RNA logoLink to RNA
. 1996 Mar;2(3):244–253.

Structure of 4.5S RNA in the signal recognition particle of Escherichia coli as studied by enzymatic and chemical probing.

G Lentzen 1, H Moine 1, C Ehresmann 1, B Ehresmann 1, W Wintermeyer 1
PMCID: PMC1369367  PMID: 8608448

Abstract

The structure of 4.5S RNA, the Escherichia coli homologue of the signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA, alone and in the SRP complex with protein P48 (Ffh) was probed both enzymatically and chemically. The molecule is largely resistant against single strand-specific nucleases, indicating a highly base paired structure. Reactivity appears mainly in the apical tetraloop and in one of the conserved internal loops. Although some residues are found reactive toward dimethylsulphate and kethoxal in regions predicted to be unpaired by the phylogenetic secondary structure model of 4.5S RNA, generally the reactivity is low, and some residues in internal loops are not reactive at all. RNase V1 cleaves the RNA at multiple sites that coincide with predicted helices, although the cleavages show a pronounced asymmetry. The binding of protein P48 to 4.5S RNA results in a protection of residues in the apical part of the molecule homologous to eukaryotic SRP RNA (domain IV), whereas the cleavages in the conserved apical tetraloop are not protected. Hydroxyl radical treatment reveals an asymmetric pattern of backbone reactivity; in particular, the region encompassing nucleotides 60-82, i.e., the 3' part of the conserved domain IV, is protected. The data suggest that a bend in the domain IV region, most likely at the central asymmetric internal loop, is an important element of the tertiary structure of 4.5S RNA. Hyperchromicity and lead cleavage data are consistent with the model as they reveal the unfolding of a higher-order structure between 30 and 40 degrees C. Protection by protein P48 occurs in this region of the RNA and, more strongly, in the 5' part of domain IV (nt 26-50, most strongly from 35 to 49). It is likely that P48 binds to the outside of the bent form of 4.5S RNA.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Althoff S., Selinger D., Wise J. A. Molecular evolution of SRP cycle components: functional implications. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Jun 11;22(11):1933–1947. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.11.1933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernstein H. D., Poritz M. A., Strub K., Hoben P. J., Brenner S., Walter P. Model for signal sequence recognition from amino-acid sequence of 54K subunit of signal recognition particle. Nature. 1989 Aug 10;340(6233):482–486. doi: 10.1038/340482a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernstein H. D., Zopf D., Freymann D. M., Walter P. Functional substitution of the signal recognition particle 54-kDa subunit by its Escherichia coli homolog. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jun 1;90(11):5229–5233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.11.5229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bourgaize D. B., Farrell C., Langley K. H., Fournier M. J. Physical properties of the E. coli 4.5S RNA: first results suggest a hairpin helix of unusual thermal stability. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Feb 24;12(4):2019–2034. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.4.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown S. Time of action of 4.5 S RNA in Escherichia coli translation. J Mol Biol. 1989 Sep 5;209(1):79–90. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90171-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brunel C., Romby P., Westhof E., Ehresmann C., Ehresmann B. Three-dimensional model of Escherichia coli ribosomal 5 S RNA as deduced from structure probing in solution and computer modeling. J Mol Biol. 1991 Sep 5;221(1):293–308. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)80220-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Connolly T., Gilmore R. The signal recognition particle receptor mediates the GTP-dependent displacement of SRP from the signal sequence of the nascent polypeptide. Cell. 1989 May 19;57(4):599–610. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90129-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dirheimer G., Ebel J. P., Bonnet J., Gangloff J., Keith G., Krebs B., Kuntzel B., Roy A., Weissenbach J., Werner C. Structure primaire des tRN. Biochimie. 1972;54(2):127–144. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9084(72)80097-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. England T. E., Uhlenbeck O. C. 3'-terminal labelling of RNA with T4 RNA ligase. Nature. 1978 Oct 12;275(5680):560–561. doi: 10.1038/275560a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gilmore R., Blobel G., Walter P. Protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum. I. Detection in the microsomal membrane of a receptor for the signal recognition particle. J Cell Biol. 1982 Nov;95(2 Pt 1):463–469. doi: 10.1083/jcb.95.2.463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gornicki P., Baudin F., Romby P., Wiewiorowski M., Kryzosiak W., Ebel J. P., Ehresmann C., Ehresmann B. Use of lead(II) to probe the structure of large RNA's. Conformation of the 3' terminal domain of E. coli 16S rRNA and its involvement in building the tRNA binding sites. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1989 Apr;6(5):971–984. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1989.10506525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hauser S., Bacher G., Dobberstein B., Lütcke H. A complex of the signal sequence binding protein and the SRP RNA promotes translocation of nascent proteins. EMBO J. 1995 Nov 15;14(22):5485–5493. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00235.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hüttenhofer A., Noller H. F. Footprinting mRNA-ribosome complexes with chemical probes. EMBO J. 1994 Aug 15;13(16):3892–3901. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06700.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Krzyzosiak W. J., Marciniec T., Wiewiorowski M., Romby P., Ebel J. P., Giegé R. Characterization of the lead(II)-induced cleavages in tRNAs in solution and effect of the Y-base removal in yeast tRNAPhe. Biochemistry. 1988 Jul 26;27(15):5771–5777. doi: 10.1021/bi00415a056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Latham J. A., Cech T. R. Defining the inside and outside of a catalytic RNA molecule. Science. 1989 Jul 21;245(4915):276–282. doi: 10.1126/science.2501870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lentzen G., Dobberstein B., Wintermeyer W. Formation of SRP-like particle induces a conformational change in E. coli 4.5S RNA. FEBS Lett. 1994 Jul 18;348(3):233–238. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00599-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Luirink J., High S., Wood H., Giner A., Tollervey D., Dobberstein B. Signal-sequence recognition by an Escherichia coli ribonucleoprotein complex. Nature. 1992 Oct 22;359(6397):741–743. doi: 10.1038/359741a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Luirink J., ten Hagen-Jongman C. M., van der Weijden C. C., Oudega B., High S., Dobberstein B., Kusters R. An alternative protein targeting pathway in Escherichia coli: studies on the role of FtsY. EMBO J. 1994 May 15;13(10):2289–2296. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06511.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Meyer D. I., Krause E., Dobberstein B. Secretory protein translocation across membranes-the role of the "docking protein'. Nature. 1982 Jun 24;297(5868):647–650. doi: 10.1038/297647a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Miller J. D., Bernstein H. D., Walter P. Interaction of E. coli Ffh/4.5S ribonucleoprotein and FtsY mimics that of mammalian signal recognition particle and its receptor. Nature. 1994 Feb 17;367(6464):657–659. doi: 10.1038/367657a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Murphy F. L., Cech T. R. GAAA tetraloop and conserved bulge stabilize tertiary structure of a group I intron domain. J Mol Biol. 1994 Feb 11;236(1):49–63. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pan T., Gutell R. R., Uhlenbeck O. C. Folding of circularly permuted transfer RNAs. Science. 1991 Nov 29;254(5036):1361–1364. doi: 10.1126/science.1720569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Phillips G. J., Silhavy T. J. The E. coli ffh gene is necessary for viability and efficient protein export. Nature. 1992 Oct 22;359(6397):744–746. doi: 10.1038/359744a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Poritz M. A., Bernstein H. D., Strub K., Zopf D., Wilhelm H., Walter P. An E. coli ribonucleoprotein containing 4.5S RNA resembles mammalian signal recognition particle. Science. 1990 Nov 23;250(4984):1111–1117. doi: 10.1126/science.1701272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ribes V., Römisch K., Giner A., Dobberstein B., Tollervey D. E. coli 4.5S RNA is part of a ribonucleoprotein particle that has properties related to signal recognition particle. Cell. 1990 Nov 2;63(3):591–600. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90454-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rosenbaum V., Riesner D. Temperature-gradient gel electrophoresis. Thermodynamic analysis of nucleic acids and proteins in purified form and in cellular extracts. Biophys Chem. 1987 May 9;26(2-3):235–246. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(87)80026-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Römisch K., Webb J., Herz J., Prehn S., Frank R., Vingron M., Dobberstein B. Homology of 54K protein of signal-recognition particle, docking protein and two E. coli proteins with putative GTP-binding domains. Nature. 1989 Aug 10;340(6233):478–482. doi: 10.1038/340478a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Samuelsson T. A Mycoplasma protein homologous to mammalian SRP54 recognizes a highly conserved domain of SRP RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Nov 11;20(21):5763–5770. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.21.5763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Siegel V., Walter P. The affinity of signal recognition particle for presecretory proteins is dependent on nascent chain length. EMBO J. 1988 Jun;7(6):1769–1775. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03007.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Walter P., Blobel G. Signal recognition particle contains a 7S RNA essential for protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum. Nature. 1982 Oct 21;299(5885):691–698. doi: 10.1038/299691a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Walter P., Ibrahimi I., Blobel G. Translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum. I. Signal recognition protein (SRP) binds to in-vitro-assembled polysomes synthesizing secretory protein. J Cell Biol. 1981 Nov;91(2 Pt 1):545–550. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.2.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Walter P., Johnson A. E. Signal sequence recognition and protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1994;10:87–119. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.10.110194.000511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wood H., Luirink J., Tollervey D. Evolutionary conserved nucleotides within the E.coli 4.5S RNA are required for association with P48 in vitro and for optimal function in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Nov 25;20(22):5919–5925. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.22.5919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wu J. C., Kozarich J. W., Stubbe J. The mechanism of free base formation from DNA by bleomycin. A proposal based on site specific tritium release from Poly(dA.dU). J Biol Chem. 1983 Apr 25;258(8):4694–4697. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zuker M., Stiegler P. Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamics and auxiliary information. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Jan 10;9(1):133–148. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.1.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zwieb C., Larsen N. The signal recognition particle database (SRPDB). Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Sep;22(17):3483–3484. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.17.3483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from RNA are provided here courtesy of The RNA Society

RESOURCES