Skip to main content
PMC home page
RNA logoLink to RNA
. 1998 Jul;4(7):750–765. doi: 10.1017/s1355838298971667

Binding of the 60-kDa Ro autoantigen to Y RNAs: evidence for recognition in the major groove of a conserved helix.

C D Green 1, K S Long 1, H Shi 1, S L Wolin 1
PMCID: PMC1369656  PMID: 9671049

Abstract

The 60-kDa Ro autoantigen is normally complexed with small cytoplasmic RNAs known as Y RNAs. In Xenopus oocytes, the Ro protein is also complexed with a large class of variant 5S rRNA precursors that are folded incorrectly. Using purified baculovirus-expressed protein, we show that the 60-kDa Ro protein binds directly to both Y RNAs and misfolded 5S rRNA precursors. To understand how the protein recognizes these two distinct classes of RNAs, we investigated the features of Y RNA sequence and structure that are necessary for protein recognition. We identified a truncated Y RNA that is stably bound by the 60-kDa Ro protein. Within this 39-nt RNA is a conserved helix that is proposed to be the binding site for the Ro protein. Mutagenesis of this minimal Y RNA revealed that binding by the 60-kDa Ro protein requires specific base pairs within the conserved helix, a singly bulged nucleotide that disrupts the helix, and a three-nucleotide bulge on the opposing strand. Chemical probing experiments using diethyl pyrocarbonate demonstrated that, in the presence of the two bulges, the major groove of the conserved helix is accessible to protein side chains. These data are consistent with a model in which the Ro protein recognizes specific base pairs in the conserved helix by binding in the major groove of the RNA. Furthermore, experiments in which dimethyl sulfate was used to probe a naked and protein-bound Y RNA revealed that a structural alteration occurs in the RNA upon Ro protein binding.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ben-Chetrit E., Chan E. K., Sullivan K. F., Tan E. M. A 52-kD protein is a novel component of the SS-A/Ro antigenic particle. J Exp Med. 1988 May 1;167(5):1560–1571. doi: 10.1084/jem.167.5.1560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Black D. L., Pinto A. L. U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein: RNA structure analysis and ATP-dependent interaction with U4/U6. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Aug;9(8):3350–3359. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.8.3350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boire G., Gendron M., Monast N., Bastin B., Ménard H. A. Purification of antigenically intact Ro ribonucleoproteins; biochemical and immunological evidence that the 52-kD protein is not a Ro protein. Clin Exp Immunol. 1995 Jun;100(3):489–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1995.tb03728.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Deutscher S. L., Harley J. B., Keene J. D. Molecular analysis of the 60-kDa human Ro ribonucleoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(24):9479–9483. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.24.9479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. England T. E., Bruce A. G., Uhlenbeck O. C. Specific labeling of 3' termini of RNA with T4 RNA ligase. Methods Enzymol. 1980;65(1):65–74. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(80)65011-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Farris A. D., Gross J. K., Hanas J. S., Harley J. B. Genes for murine Y1 and Y3 Ro RNAs have class 3 RNA polymerase III promoter structures and are unlinked on mouse chromosome 6. Gene. 1996 Sep 26;174(1):35–42. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(96)00279-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Farris A. D., O'Brien C. A., Harley J. B. Y3 is the most conserved small RNA component of Ro ribonucleoprotein complexes in vertebrate species. Gene. 1995 Mar 10;154(2):193–198. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(94)00823-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hendrick J. P., Wolin S. L., Rinke J., Lerner M. R., Steitz J. A. Ro small cytoplasmic ribonucleoproteins are a subclass of La ribonucleoproteins: further characterization of the Ro and La small ribonucleoproteins from uninfected mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1981 Dec;1(12):1138–1149. doi: 10.1128/mcb.1.12.1138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Howe P. W., Nagai K., Neuhaus D., Varani G. NMR studies of U1 snRNA recognition by the N-terminal RNP domain of the human U1A protein. EMBO J. 1994 Aug 15;13(16):3873–3881. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06698.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kato N., Hoshino H., Harada F. Nucleotide sequence of 4.5S RNA (C8 or hY5) from HeLa cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1982 Sep 16;108(1):363–370. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(82)91875-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kelekar A., Saitta M. R., Keene J. D. Molecular composition of Ro small ribonucleoprotein complexes in human cells. Intracellular localization of the 60- and 52-kD proteins. J Clin Invest. 1994 Apr;93(4):1637–1644. doi: 10.1172/JCI117145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kunkel T. A., Roberts J. D., Zakour R. A. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Methods Enzymol. 1987;154:367–382. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)54085-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Matera A. G., Frey M. R., Margelot K., Wolin S. L. A perinucleolar compartment contains several RNA polymerase III transcripts as well as the polypyrimidine tract-binding protein, hnRNP I. J Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;129(5):1181–1193. doi: 10.1083/jcb.129.5.1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Melin L., Soldati D., Mital R., Streit A., Schümperli D. Biochemical demonstration of complex formation of histone pre-mRNA with U7 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein and hairpin binding factors. EMBO J. 1992 Feb;11(2):691–697. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05101.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. O'Brien C. A., Harley J. B. A subset of hY RNAs is associated with erythrocyte Ro ribonucleoproteins. EMBO J. 1990 Nov;9(11):3683–3689. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07580.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. O'Brien C. A., Margelot K., Wolin S. L. Xenopus Ro ribonucleoproteins: members of an evolutionarily conserved class of cytoplasmic ribonucleoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Aug 1;90(15):7250–7254. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.15.7250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. O'Brien C. A., Wolin S. L. A possible role for the 60-kD Ro autoantigen in a discard pathway for defective 5S rRNA precursors. Genes Dev. 1994 Dec 1;8(23):2891–2903. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.23.2891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Peattie D. A. Direct chemical method for sequencing RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Apr;76(4):1760–1764. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.4.1760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Peattie D. A., Gilbert W. Chemical probes for higher-order structure in RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Aug;77(8):4679–4682. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.8.4679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pruijn G. J., Slobbe R. L., van Venrooij W. J. Analysis of protein--RNA interactions within Ro ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Oct 11;19(19):5173–5180. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.19.5173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Query C. C., Bentley R. C., Keene J. D. A specific 31-nucleotide domain of U1 RNA directly interacts with the 70K small nuclear ribonucleoprotein component. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Nov;9(11):4872–4881. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.11.4872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Seeman N. C., Rosenberg J. M., Rich A. Sequence-specific recognition of double helical nucleic acids by proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Mar;73(3):804–808. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.3.804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shi H., O'Brien C. A., Van Horn D. J., Wolin S. L. A misfolded form of 5S rRNA is complexed with the Ro and La autoantigens. RNA. 1996 Aug;2(8):769–784. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Slobbe R. L., Pluk W., van Venrooij W. J., Pruijn G. J. Ro ribonucleoprotein assembly in vitro. Identification of RNA-protein and protein-protein interactions. J Mol Biol. 1992 Sep 20;227(2):361–366. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90890-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stern S., Powers T., Changchien L. M., Noller H. F. RNA-protein interactions in 30S ribosomal subunits: folding and function of 16S rRNA. Science. 1989 May 19;244(4906):783–790. doi: 10.1126/science.2658053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Uhlenbeck O. C., Pardi A., Feigon J. RNA structure comes of age. Cell. 1997 Sep 5;90(5):833–840. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80348-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Van Horn D. J., Eisenberg D., O'Brien C. A., Wolin S. L. Caenorhabditis elegans embryos contain only one major species of Ro RNP. RNA. 1995 May;1(3):293–303. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Weeks K. M., Crothers D. M. Major groove accessibility of RNA. Science. 1993 Sep 17;261(5128):1574–1577. doi: 10.1126/science.7690496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Weeks K. M., Crothers D. M. RNA recognition by Tat-derived peptides: interaction in the major groove? Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):577–588. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wolin S. L., Steitz J. A. Genes for two small cytoplasmic Ro RNAs are adjacent and appear to be single-copy in the human genome. Cell. 1983 Mar;32(3):735–744. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90059-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wolin S. L., Steitz J. A. The Ro small cytoplasmic ribonucleoproteins: identification of the antigenic protein and its binding site on the Ro RNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Apr;81(7):1996–2000. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.7.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. van Gelder C. W., Thijssen J. P., Klaassen E. C., Sturchler C., Krol A., van Venrooij W. J., Pruijn G. J. Common structural features of the Ro RNP associated hY1 and hY5 RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Jul 11;22(13):2498–2506. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.13.2498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from RNA are provided here courtesy of The RNA Society

RESOURCES