Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 2026 Oct 26;54(20):gkag976. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkag976

Neuronal DNA repair mediates systemic mitochondrial maintenance through acetylcholine signaling

Paulo Francisco Lopes da Silva 1,2,b, Baptiste Ropert 3,4,b, Devin Mares 5,6, Matthias Rieckher 7,8, Corvin Rive 9,10, Björn Schumacher 11,12,✉
PMCID: PMC13697224  PMID: 42929695

Abstract

DNA repair defects such as nucleotide excision repair (NER) mutations can lead to progeroid syndromes characterized by growth retardation and accelerated aging with distinct tissue type specific pathologies. DNA-damage-induced dysfunction of specific cell types can impair the organism’s overall function. It is unknown whether, in reverse, DNA repair in specific tissues can have non-cell-autonomous consequences on other tissues carrying DNA damage. To explore the organismal consequences of cell-type-specific DNA repair, we restricted NER activity to specific tissues and monitored consequences on organismal health in Caenorhabditis elegans. Unexpectedly, we observed that tissue-specific DNA repair is sufficient to improve overall DNA damage resistance. Strikingly, NER activity restricted to neurons only is sufficient to provide similar overall DNA damage resistance as whole-body NER in almost all tissues tested. We show that this systemic DNA damage resilience is mediated by neuronal acetylcholine signaling that promotes the maintenance of mitochondrial activity throughout the organism.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Introduction

The genome is constantly exposed to genotoxic threats stemming from the normal cellular metabolism [1] and due to external sources [2], leading to genome instability that causes cancer [3] and promotes aging [4, 5]. Among the specialized pathways to remove the DNA damage [6], nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a versatile mechanism that removes bulky lesion types that lead to the stalling of RNA and DNA polymerases, depending on cell type and developmental stage, usually in the span of 24 h to several days [7]. UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 6–4 photoproducts are paradigm damage types that lead to a distortion of the DNA double helix. In humans, defects in global genome (GG)-NER, caused by mutations in XPC, XPA, the TFIIH-XPB-XPD complex, or in the XPF and XPG endonucleases, lead to Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP). XP patients display photosensitivity, 1000-fold increased risk of developing cancer in the skin and eyes, and in ∼30% patients, including those with XPA mutations, progressive neurological degeneration [8–10]. Defects in transcription-coupled (TC)-NER activity, caused by mutations in either the lesion recognition factors CSA or CSB, lead to Cockayne’s syndrome (CS). CS patients display accelerated aging phenotypes in multiple tissues, including severe neurodegeneration, hearing loss, cataracts and cachexia, as well as growth impairment [11]. Additionally, point mutations in XPB, XPD, and TTDA are also associated with Trichothiodystrophy, a progeroid syndrome that very much resembles CS but in which patients also display brittle hair and nails [12].

The heterogenous outcomes of NER deficiency highlight the segmental consequences of DNA damage accumulation, i.e. different tissues are differentially affected. This suggests that the requirement for the DNA repair machinery is not necessarily similar in all cell types. However, it is still unclear whether distinct tissues employ different strategies to maintain functionality and whether more complex inter-tissue signaling responses are involved in the maintenance of tissue functionality when faced with DNA damage.

XPA is a key NER factor involved in damage verification, DNA strand unwinding, and assembly of the endonuclease incision complex [13–15]. Due to its capacity to bind proteins involved in every step of the NER pathway, as well as other regulatory factors, such as ATR and PARP-1 [16], XPA plays a central role in NER regulation. In Caenorhabditis elegans, xpa-1 loss-of-function mutations lead to hypersensitivity to UV-induced DNA damage during development and adulthood [17–20].

Here, we generated a model that allows testing the requirement of cell type specific DNA repair using C. elegans as organismal model featuring specialized neuronal, intestinal, and muscle cells. We employed UV irradiation as it leads to specific and well-defined lesions that strictly require NER for their removal. To generate an experimental model with cell-type-restricted DNA repair activity, we employed xpa-1(ok698) mutant animals that are completely NER deficient and reintroduced NER capacity by transgenic expression of XPA-1::GFP under the control of endogenous, neuron-, muscle-, or intestine-specific promoters. We show that the tissue-specific restriction of NER is sufficient to partially protect the animals from DNA damage. Most strikingly, restricting NER only to neurons conferred a similar level of protection against DNA damage as observed in animals with the endogenous reconstitution of NER. Neuronal DNA repair was sufficient to reverse DNA-damage-induced pathologies, including developmental growth retardation and accelerated aging, and maintain health parameters with the exception of intestinal function. We further determined that the systemic effect of xpa-1 relies on the acetylcholine signaling pathway, unravelling a previously unknown function of this neurotransmitter in regulating the DNA damage response. We further observed that the neuron-specific NER activity reversed the systemic dampening of mitochondrial activity, which we propose is sufficient for mitigating the organismal consequences of DNA damage.

Methods

Caenorhabditis elegans strains and maintenance

Caenorhabditis elegans worms were grown according to standard practices [64]. In short, worms were kept at 20°C on NGM plates seeded with Escherichia coli strain OP50 and kept in sealed boxes in light-protected incubators. All strains used in this study are summarized in Supplementary Table S1.

Generation of transgenic lines

Transgenic C. elegans lines were generated following previously described protocol [65]. To generate the tissue-specific XPA-1::GFP expression strains, each specific promoter was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (2kb upstream respective ATG; Pxpa-1: FW: ACTAAGCTTGCACCAATTGGTGCATGTTC, RV: AGTGTCGACCGGCATTTATCTGAAACAATCG; Pmyo-3: FW: ATAGCGGCCGCTTCTAGATGGATCTAGTGG, RV: TATGGCGCGCCGATTGCTTTTTCACAATCAG; Pges-1: FW: ATAGCGGCCGCCTGAATTCAAAGATAAGATATG, RV: TATGGCGCGCCCTCCGAACTATGATGAC; Prgef-1: FW: ATAGCGGCCGCCGTCGTCGTCGTCGATG, RV: TATGGCGCGCCGCTCAATTGAATGACGTCACAGG) and inserted in pPD95 worm expression plasmid. xpa-1 gene was then amplified by PCR on wild-type DNA and inserted in resulting plasmids. Young adults of the RB864 strain (xpa-1(ok896)) were injected using a microinjection system, and pCFJ90 (pmyo-2::tdTomato) or pCFJ68 (punc-122::gfp) were used as co-injection markers. Extrachromosomal arrays were integrated using gamma irradiation and backcrossed four times.

Hypochlorite synchronization

Gravid adult worms were washed with 10 ml of 1× M9 buffer and collected. The worms were centrifuged 1 min at 350 × g, and the supernatant was discarded. The pellet was resuspended in 3 ml of alkaline hypochlorite solution (10% sodium hypochlorite, 5 M NaOH) and incubated 3 min with gentle shaking. The reaction was stopped by addiction of 10 ml M9 buffer. The remining eggs were centrifuged 2 min at 800 g, and the supernatant removed. The eggs were washed three times in 5 ml M9 buffer, then incubated overnight in 5 ml of M9 Buffer on a rotator (RM10W-80V CAT). THE Next day, prior to seeding, the L1 larvae were filtered on a 11 µM hydrophilic filter (Merck Millipore) concentrated and counted.

UV irradiation

For L1 larvae, after counting, the appropriate number of worms was seeded on NGM agar plates freshly seeded with OP50 bacteria to avoid shielding of the UVB. The worms were let on bacteria for 4 h to recover from overnight starvation. The worms were then placed under a UVB lamp (Waldmann Medizinthechnik UV 236 B) for the appropriate time with lead open to avoid shielding of the UVB.

For Day 1 adult worms, synchronized plates were washed with 10 ml of 1 × M9 buffer and collected. The worms were centrifugated 1min at 350 × g. The supernatant was discarded, leaving a few hundred microliter, to transfer the worms on a non-seeded NGM plate to avoid shielding of the UVB. The plates were let to dry under a fume hood for several minutes and placed under a UVB lamp (Waldmann Medizinthechnik UV 236 B) for the appropriate time with lead open to avoid shielding of the UVB. The worms were then washed with 10 ml M9 buffer, centrifugated 1 min at 350 × g, The supernatant was discarded leaving a few hundred microliter and the worms transferred on a OP50-seeded NGM plate. The power of the lamp was measured using a AnalytikJena UVX Radiometer, and the exposure time was calculated as follows:

graphic file with name TM0001.gif

The amount of UVB was adapted to the worms’ developmental stage and the DNA damage sensitivity of each strain, with a range of 0 mJ/cm² to 10 mJ/cm² on L1 worms (0 to 4 with xpa-1(ok698)) and 0 mJ/cm² to 100 mJ/cm² on Day 1 adult worms (0 to 25 with xpa-1(ok698)).

Developmental assay

Hypochlorite synchronization was performed, and around 200 L1 worms were UVB-irradiated. The worms were then incubated 72 h at 20°C. Once wild-type worms reached adulthood, plates were imaged at 30× magnification using a Zeiss Axio Zoom. V16. Worms were categorized as L1, L2, L3, L4, and adults using the ImageJ software and plotted as percentage of the whole population.

Lifespan assay

Synchronized populations of C. elegans worms (60 to 90 worms per condition) were irradiated at day 1 adulthood and transferred into OP50 seeded NGM plates. The worms were then maintained at 20°C and monitored every day for dead worms. Worms found dried on the walls of the plates, or dead due to internal hatching or during transfer, were censored. Worms were considered dead if no motility nor pharyngeal pumping was observed after three stimuli with a worm pick. To avoid progeny accumulation, the worms were transferred to new plates every day as long as laying eggs. Results were then plotted using the “Survival” option of the GraphPad Prism 10 software.

Motility assay

Synchronized populations of C. elegans worms were irradiated with UVB at day 1 adulthood. After 24 h after, worms were transferred into M9 media. The number of bends in 30 s was manually counted using a clicker and a Zeiss AXIO Zoom.V16 stereomicroscope.

Speed measurement

Synchronized populations of C. elegans worms were irradiated with UVB doses at day 1 adulthood. After 72 h of irradiation, 30–40 worms were transferred to non-seeded NGM agar plates and filmed, 30 min later, for 30 s using a Zeiss AXIO Zoom.V16 stereomicroscope. Video analysis and quantification of average and maximum speed values were done using the “wrMTrck” ImageJ plugin as previously described [66].

Pharyngeal pumping assay

Synchronized populations of C. elegans worms were irradiated with UVB at day 1 adulthood. After 24 h, the number of pumps in 30 s was manually counted using a clicker and a Zeiss AXIO Zoom.V16 stereomicroscope.

DiI filling

Prior to the staining procedure, a DiI stock solution (2mg/ml 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI) in dimethyl formamide) was prepared and kept at −20°C. Synchronized populations of C. elegans worms were irradiated UVB at day 1 adulthood. After 48 h irradiation, worms were collected from the plates and washed 3 times with 1 × M9 buffer. Afterwards, worms were incubated in 5 ml of freshly prepared DiI staining solution (1:200 dilution of DiI stock solution in 1× M9) for 45 min, in the dark, at RT, on a rotator (RM10W-80V CAT). Worms were then centrifuged (1 min, 350 × g) and washed three times with M9 buffer. Excessive staining was remove by letting the worms 1 h on heat-inactivated (2 h at 65°C) OP50-seeded plates for 1 h. Afterwards, 15–20 worms were transferred to 2% agarose pads in microscope slides via picking, anesthetized with 5 mM Levamisole [Levamisol(−)-Tetramisol-hydrochlorid, L9756-5G Sigma–Aldrich] and imaged with a Zeiss AxioImager M1 microscope with 10× magnification. Exposure time was selected for each experiment based on the fluorescence signal of the non-irradiated wild-type population. Worms with visible stained phasmid cell bodies were manually quantified.

Intestinal barrier function assay

Intestinal barrier function assays (Smurf assays) were performed as previously described [67], with some modifications. Synchronized populations of C. elegans worms were irradiated with UVB at day 1 adulthood. After 72 h of irradiation, worms were washed 1× with M9 buffer and incubated in 500 µl Blue Food Solution (50 µl 5% Brilliant Blue FCF (Sigma–Aldrich) in H2O; 50 µl 3x concentrated E. coli OP50 overnight culture in LB medium and 400 µl M9 buffer) for 6 h at RT on a rotator (RM10W-80V CAT). Worms were then washed once with M9 buffer, collected by gravity settling on ice and transferred into empty NGM agar and let to dry under a fume hood. Finally, worms were transferred to 2% agarose pads in microscope slides via picking, anesthetized with 5 mM Levamisole (Levamisol(−)-Tetramisol-hydrochlorid, L9756-5G Sigma–Aldrich) and imaged with a Zeiss AxioImager M1 microscope with 5× magnification. Exposure time was selected for each experiment based on the fluorescence signal of the non-irradiated wild-type population. Worms with visible dye spread all over the body cavity (Smurf phenotype) were manually quantified.

RT-qPCR

Synchronized population of 2000 Day 1 adults animals were UV irradiated. After 24 h, the animals were washed three time in 1× M9 buffer before snap freeze in 1ml TRIzol (Invitrogen, 15 596 018). Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN, 74 106) following manufacturers guide but replacing the chlorophorm by 1-bromo-3-chloropropane (Sigma, B9673). RNA quantity was quantified using NanoDrop 8000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, ND-8000-GL) and quality tested by assessing ribosomal RNA on a electrophoresis gel. 1µg of RNA was reverse transcribed using the Superscript III (Invitrogen, 18 080 044) and qPCR was performed in a BIO-RAD CFX96 real-time PCR machine (BIO-RAD, 1 855 196) using PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystem A25742). Quantity of cha-1 expression was normalized to three different housekeeping genes: eif3.c, tbg-1, and act-1. Primer sequences: cha-1 FW: CGTGGTGTGTCTTGACATGGA, RV: CGATTGAGCCCGAACTTTGA. eif-3.c FW: ACACTTGACGAGCCCACCGAC, RV: TGCCGCTCGTTCCTTCCTGG. tbg-1 FW: CAATGTGCCCATCAATTCGG, RV: AACAAGAAGCGAGTGACGTC. act-1 FW: CCACCATGTACCCAGGAATT, RV: AGAGGGAAGCGAGGATAGAT. Relative mRNA levels were quantified using the 2−ΔΔCt method [68].

TMRE staining

TMRE staining experiments were performed as previously described [58]. Synchronized populations of C. elegans worms were irradiated with UVB at day 1 adulthood. After 24 h irradiation, worms were transferred on NGM agar plates, previously seeded with 30 µM TMRE (Tetramethylrhodamin-Ethylester-Perchlorat 87917–25MG Sigma Aldrich) dissolved in heat-inactivated OP50 (2 h at 65°C). The worms were incubated for 2 h before to be transferred to heat inactivated OP50 seeded NGM plates for 1 h to remove extra dye from the intestine. Then, 20–30 worms were transferred to 2% agarose pads in microscope slides via picking, anesthetized with 5 mM Levamisole (Levamisol(−)-Tetramisol-hydrochlorid, L9756-5G Sigma–Aldrich) and imaged with a Zeiss AxioImager M1 microscope with 5× magnification. For the analysis, mean fluorescence of the whole worm body was quantified using ImageJ.

Oxygen consumption measurement

SDR SensorDish® Reader : synchronized populations of C. elegans worms were irradiated with UVB at day 1 adulthood. After 24 h of irradiation, worms were washed five times with M9 buffer to remove bacteria and resuspended in complete liquid NGM media mixed with inactivated OP50 (2 h at 65°C, OD = 0.8). 100 worms were platted in 6 ml NGM per well in a DeepWell OxoDish. The plate was sealed with a BioRad Microseal® Adhesive Sealer (MSB-001) and incubated 20°C. The oxygen concentration in each well as measure every minute for 36 h using the SDR SensorDish® Reader and the SDR 4.0 software from the Presens company. Quantification was made by calculating the slope of for each curve at the linear state.

Oroboros: synchronized populations of C. elegans worms were irradiated with UVB at day 1 adulthood. After 24 h of irradiation, worms were washed five times with M9 buffer to remove bacteria and resuspended in complete liquid NGM media. After calibration the worms were transferred in the Oroboros O2K-oxygraph. The oxygen flux was measured before (Basal respiration) and after addition of 10 µl of 5M Sodium-Azide (S2002 – Sigma–Aldrich) (Non-mitochondrial respiration) and the phosphorylating respiration rate was calculated by subtracting the Non-mitochondrial respiration from the Basal respiration.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed using the GraphPad Prism 10 software package (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, USA). The statistical tests applied for each experiment are reported in the figure legends. Only P-value of significant differences (<0.05) are displayed on graphs. For developmental assays, “n = ” represent the total number of animals scored among all biological replicates. For developmental assays, a modified ANOVA was performed using the following definitions for the total sum of squares (SSt) and the within group sum of squares (SSw), with g being groups, n the number of replicates and x the vector of ratios of the stages:

graphic file with name TM0004.gif
graphic file with name TM0005.gif

Unless stated, the test was performed against the control condition. For readability, the significance was displayed as follow: *=p < .05; **=p < .01; ***=p < .001. Exact P-values can be found in Supplementary Table S2.

Results

DNA repair restoration by tissue-specific XPA-1::GFP expression

In order to determine the tissues where XPA-1 is expressed in normal conditions, we generated a transgenic C. elegans strain expressing XPA-1 C-terminally-tagged with GFP under the endogenous xpa-1 promoter. We observed XPA-1 expression throughout all developmental stages, with very high expression in the embryo, and during adulthood in several somatic tissues, including the intestine, muscle, cuticle, and neurons (Fig. 1A, Supplementary Fig. S1A). To better understand the contribution of tissue-specific xpa-1 activity in organismal responses to DNA damage, we generated transgenic lines that express XPA-1 fused to GFP in specific tissues (Supplementary Table 1). We stably integrated the XPA-1::GFP transgene under control of distinct tissue-specific promoters in a xpa-1 null background (ok698) allele), in which approximately half of the ORF is deleted [21, 22], thus generating tissue-specific xpa-1 rescue lines. Following this strategy, we developed four rescue lines: an endogenous xpa-1 rescue line (Endogenous rescue) under control of the endogenous xpa-1 promoter (xpa-1(ok698);[pxpa-1::gfp::xpa-1;pmyo-2::tdTomato]), an intestinal rescue line (Intestinal rescue) under control of the ges-1 promoter (xpa-1(ok698);[pges-1::gfp::xpa-1;pmyo-2::tdTomato]), a muscle rescue line (Muscle rescue) under control of the myo-3 promoter (xpa-1(ok698);[pmyo-3::gfp::xpa-1;pmyo-2::tdTomato]), and a neuronal rescue line (Neuronal rescue), under control of the pan-neuronal rgef-1 promoter (xpa-1(ok698);[prgef-1::gfp::xpa-1;punc-122::gfp]). Using confocal microscopy, we observed GFP fluorescence exclusively in the targeted tissues in each rescue line, thus confirming the tissue-specific expression of XPA-1::GFP (Figs 1B-E, Supplementary Fig. S1B-D).

Figure 1.

Confocal microscopy images of XPA-1-GFP expression in adult stage C. elegans. The different panels show that the expression of XPA-1-GFP in the tissue-specific rescue lines is indeed only expressed in the desired tissues (either muscle cells, intestinal cells, neuronal cells or endogenously expressed).

Tissue-specific XPA-1::GFP expression in C. elegans. (A) Representative fluorescence images of L4 (top panel), Day 1 adults (bottom panel) and embryo (bottom left) from nematodes showing XPA-1::GFP expression under the endogenous xpa-1 promoter. Cuticle and neuronal system displaying particularly clear expression are highlighted in right boxes. Scale bars = 50µm. (B) Representative fluorescence images of XPA-1::GFP expression in the nuclei of intestinal cells (pges-1::xpa-1::gfp) and tdTomato expression in the pharynx (pmyo-2::tdTomato) (co-injection marker), from day 1 adults. Scale bar = 50µm. (C) Representative fluorescence images of XPA-1::GFP expression in the nuclei of muscle cells (pmyo-3::xpa-1::gfp) and tdTomato expression in the pharynx (pmyo-2::tdTomato) (co-injection marker)), from day 1 adults. Scale bar = 50µm. (D) Representative fluorescence images of XPA-1::GFP expression in the nuclei of neuronal cells (prgef-1::xpa-1::gfp), And GFP expression in coelomocytes (punc-122::gfp) (co-injection marker) (white arrowheads), from day 1 adults. Scale bar = 50µm. (E) Representative fluorescence images of XPA-1::GFP expression in the nuclei of tail (top panel) and head (bottom panel) neurons (prgef-1::xpa-1::gfp), from day 1 adults. Scale bar = 50 µm.

Neuron-specific NER activity is sufficient for organismal DNA damage resistance

To evaluate how tissue-specific DNA repair influences the organism’s DNA damage sensitivity, we analyzed the delay in developmental growth in the tissue-specific XPA-1 rescue lines after UVB exposure at L1 larvae stage [23, 24]. 72 h post UV treatment of the L1 larvae, we observed some rescue effect of the UV hypersensitivity of xpa-1 mutants in each of the rescue strains (Fig. 2A). We then quantified the larval development through the L1, L2, L3, and L4 stages until adulthood. As expected [18, 19], in contrast to wild-type animals, xpa-1(ok698) failed to fully develop to adults upon 4 mJ/cm² UV irradiation. The xpa-1 mutants carrying the transgenic XPA-1::GFP under the endogenous promoters (Endogenous rescue) showed a full restoration of developmental progression at low UV-doses and mild delay at higher doses, with a small decrease in fully developed worms upon 8 mJ/cm² UV. The observed significant yet partial rescue is typically observed in transgenic rescue lines confirms the efficiency of the rescue transgene to compensate for the mutated xpa-1 gene. Interestingly, each of the tissue-specific rescue lines alleviated the UV sensitivity in the xpa-1 mutant background, however, to different degrees. The Muscle rescue showed the least efficient reversal of the UV sensitivity, with a significant decrease of fully developed worms upon 4 mJ/cm² UVB. The Intestinal rescue, showed a more pronounced rescue of the developmental growth defect with a significant but milder decrease of fully developed worms upon 4 mJ/cm² UVB. The Neuronal rescue showed the most efficient rescue of the UV sensitivity that was almost comparable with the Endogenous rescue, with a significant decrease of fully developed worms only upon 8 mJ/cm² (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2.

Pictures and graphics showing the effects of UVB induced DNA damage on development and lifespan of C. elegans in the different tissue-specific XPA-1 rescue lines (muscle rescue, intestinal rescue, neuronal rescue and endogenous rescue) when compared to XPA-1 mutants and wild-type C. elegans.

Tissue-specific XPA-1 expression differentially rescues xpa-1 UV-induced developmental arrest and lifespan shortening. (A) Representative pictures of irradiated (8 mJ/cm²) and non-irradiated wild-type, xpa-1 and xpa-1 tissue-specific rescue lines, After 72 h of UVB irradiation at L1 stage. Scale Bar = 1mm. (B) Quantification of development of wild-type, xpa-1 and xpa-1 tissue-specific rescue lines, 72 h after UVB irradiation at L1 stage. Data represent Mean + SD of N = 3 biological replicates. Statistical analysis: ANOVA. P-value:*<.05, **<.01, ***<.001. (C) Lifespan assays of wild-type, xpa-1 and xpa-1 tissue-specific rescue lines after UVB irradiation at day 1 adult stage. Representative survival curve from one individual experiment. n > 100 per condition. (D) Quantification of median lifespan and (E) maximum lifespan from survival curves displayed in panel C. Data represent Mean + SEM of N = 3 biological replicates. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA followed by Post-hoc Tukey.

In order to independently verify the effect of cell type-specific NER restriction, we performed the same analysis on strains carrying the transgenes in the form of extrachromosomal arrays. When we treated those strains with UVB, we observed a most striking rescue when driving XPA-1 expression either by the endogenous xpa-1 promoter as well as the neuron- and intestine-specific promoters and a less efficient rescue in muscle-specific XPA-1 expression in the xpa-1 mutant background (Supplementary Fig. S1E).

Exposure to genotoxic insults in adult animals is known to reduce lifespan. NER-deficient mutant worms in particular, show a robust lifespan reduction when exposed to UVB light [24]. To determine whether rescuing DNA repair in specific tissues can rescue the lifespan reduction of xpa-1 mutants, we carried out lifespan assays [25] using both the integrated tissue specific (Fig. 2C) and the extrachromosomal (Supplementary Fig. S1F) xpa-1 rescue lines. In accordance with previous results, xpa-1(ok698) showed a drastic reduction of both median and maximum lifespan (−55% and −60%, respectively) at a mild UV dose that was well tolerated by wild-type animals. The lifespan of Endogenous rescue animals was not decreased upon genotoxic stress contrary to the Intestinal rescue and Muscle rescue strains, whose median and maximum lifespan were significantly decreased but with a milder effect compared to xpa-1(ok698) (Intestinal rescue: −40% and −36%; Muscle rescue: −27% and −34%). Strikingly, the Neuronal rescue showed no decrease in lifespan compared to control and Endogenous rescue worms upon genotoxic stress (Fig. 2D and E).

Altogether, these data indicate that NER activity in either intestine, muscle, or neurons can contribute to the organism’s resistance to UV-induced DNA damage. Moreover, neuron-specific-NER activity is nearly as effective in conferring DNA damage resistance during development and aging as endogenously restored NER activity.

Neuron-specific DNA repair exerts systemic effects

To establish how cell type specific restrictions of NER activity affect physiological parameters of health, we measured the integrity of muscles, neurons and the gastrointestinal tract after UV exposure in each of the tissue-specific rescue strains. To quantify muscle capacity, we assessed motility by measuring the bending frequency. We observed that, upon DNA damage induction, the Endogenous rescue, Muscle rescue and Neuronal rescue did not show any significant decrease in the bending frequency, contrary to the xpa-1(ok698) mutant and Intestinal rescue (Fig. 3A). We then analyzed the average and maximum speed of each strain with or without DNA damage induction. Speed features of xpa-1(ok698), Intestinal rescue, Muscle rescue, and Neuronal rescue show that these worms are moving slower than the wild-type and Endogenous rescue strains. Upon DNA damage induction, we observed a significant decrease in speed in xpa-1(ok698) (Average speed: −81%; Max speed: −64%) and in Intestinal rescue (Average speed: −74%; Max speed: −58%) but not in Endogenous rescue, Muscle rescue and Neuronal rescue (Fig. 3B and C). Pharyngeal pumping necessitates a functioning neuromuscular axis and is indicative of muscular function and overall health but also survival probability [26, 27]. Except for wild-type and Endogenous rescue strains, all strains displayed a significant reduction in pumping frequency upon DNA damage. While the xpa-1(ok698) mutants and the Intestinal rescue had a very strong reduction (−88% and −67%, respectively), Muscle rescue and Neuronal rescue displayed only a mild decreased in pumping frequency (−18% and −17%, respectively) (Fig. 3D). These results suggest that DNA repair is required for maintaining somatic functions particularly in the neuromuscular axis, as a rescue of xpa-1 expression in either muscle or neuron is sufficient to restore muscle function amid DNA damage.

Figure 3.

Pictures and graphics showing the effects of UVB induced DNA damage on muscular phenotypes (motility), intestinal phenotypes (SMURF assay) and neuronal phenotypes (DiI staining) in the different tissue-specific XPA-1 rescue lines (muscle rescue, intestinal rescue, neuronal rescue and endogenous rescue) compared to XPA-1 mutant and wild-type C. elegans.

Neuron-specific XPA-1 expression rescues UV-induced phenotypes in other tissues. (A) Motility assay from wild-type, xpa-1(ok698) and xpa-1 tissue-specific rescue lines, After 24 h of UVB irradiation at Day 1 adult stage. Data represent Mean + SEM of N = 3 biological replicates. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA followed by Post-hoc Tukey. (B) Average and (C) maximum speed measurements from wild-type, xpa-1(ok698) and xpa-1 tissue-specific rescue lines, After 24 h of UVB irradiation at Day 1 adult stage. Data represent Mean + SEM of N = 3 biological replicates. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA followed by Post-hoc Tukey. (D) Quantification of pharyngeal pumping rate from wild-type, xpa-1(ok698) and xpa-1 tissue-specific rescue lines, After 24 h of UVB irradiation at Day 1 adult stage. Data represent Mean + SEM of N = 3 biological replicates. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA followed by Post-hoc Tukey. (E) Representative pictures of DiI staining of Phasmid neurons from wild-type, xpa-1(ok698) and xpa-1 tissue-specific rescue lines, After 24 h of UVB irradiation at Day 1 adult stage. Arrowhead: Phasmid neurons. Scale bar = 15 µm. (F) Quantification of worms harboring intact phasmid neurons in wild-type, xpa-1(ok698) and xpa-1 tissue-specific rescue lines, 24 h after UVB irradiation at Day 1 adult stage. Data represent Mean + SEM of N = 3 biological replicates. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA followed by Post-hoc Tukey. (G) Representative picture of Brilliant Blue staining of intestinal tracts from wild-type, xpa-1(ok698) and xpa-1 tissue-specific rescue lines, After 24 h of UVB irradiation at Day 1 adult stage. Dashed line: GI tract delimitation. Scale bar = 50 µm. (H) Quantification of worms harboring intact intestinal tract in wild-type, xpa-1(ok698) and xpa-1 tissue-specific rescue lines, After 24 h of UVB irradiation at Day 1 adult stage. Data represent Mean + SEM of N = 3 biological replicates. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA followed by Post-hoc Tukey.

To assess neuronal integrity, we took advantage of the Amphid and Phasmid sensory neurons that can be stained using 1,1′-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-Tetramethylindocarbocyanine Perchlorate (DiI) dye when intact. Upon breakage of the axon, the neurons cannot uptake the dye and are not visible [28, 29]. We observed a massive decrease in the DiI-positive neurons after UV exposure in xpa-1(ok698) mutant (-95%) compared to wild-type animals, indicative of a strong neuronal DNA damage sensitivity. In contrast, no decrease in DiI positive neurons was observed in Endogenous rescue and Neuronal rescue. The decrease in DiI positive neurons frequency in Intestinal rescue was comparable to xpa-1(ok698) (−82%) and intermediary in Muscle rescue (−54%) (Fig. 3E and F).

We next evaluated the gastrointestinal (GI) tract using Brilliant Blue FCF staining (“Smurf assay”). When mixed with food, this dye is ingested by the animals and stains the intact GI tract. Upon GI tract loss of structural integrity, the dye passes through the intestinal barrier into other tissues and stains the whole animal blue [30]. By quantifying the percentage of animals harboring a normal GI tract (without leakage into the rest of the body) after DNA damage induction, we observed that, contrary to all other tests we performed in the different tissue-specific xpa-1 rescue strains, only the Neuronal rescue strain was not able to maintain GI tract integrity after UVB exposure and showed significantly decreased levels of ntact GI tracts, reaching levels comparable to xpa-1(ok698) (−52% and −49%, respectively); All other strains showed no signs of sensitivity to DNA damage in this assay (Fig. 3G and H).

Here, our results show that DNA repair in the neurons alone is sufficient to maintain the animal’s overall health with the exception of the GI tract. Amid neuron-restricted repair, particularly the neuromuscular function remained intact suggesting a non-cell-autonomous effect of neuronal NER activity.

Acetylcholine signaling is required for systemic DNA damage resistance

To better understand how DNA repair in neurons coordinates maintenance of tissue functionality peripherally, we tested whether specific types of neuronal signaling, potentially involved in inter-tissue communication, influence organismal sensitivity to DNA damage. For this, we performed developmental assays using two mutant strains: unc-13(s69) and unc-31(e928), deficient in key synaptic vesicle priming/fusion proteins essential for small-clear vesicle (SCV) and dense-core vesicle (DCV) exocytosis, respectively [31–33]. SCVs are employed to secrete neurotransmitters such as glutamate, γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) and acetylcholine (ACh), while DCVs contain larger neuropeptides and monoamines [33] (Fig. 4A). Both unc-13(s69) and unc-31(e928) mutants possess normal nervous system architecture but an uncoordinated (unc) phenotype [31, 33]. Upon UV-induced DNA damage, the unc-13(s69) mutants displayed a significant developmental growth delay compared to wild-type animals, with a significant reduction in fully developed animals upon 25 mJ/cm² UVB. On the contrary, unc-31(e928) mutants showed similar sensitivity to DNA damage as wild-type animals, pointing toward a role of neurotransmitter but not neuropeptide signaling in the response to DNA damage (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4.

Description of the acetylcholine pathway in C. elegans followed by graphics showing the impact of a loss of either neuropeptides, neuroreceptors and more specifically acetylcholine of the response to UVB induced DNA damage in C. elegans and in the XPA-1 neuronal rescue line.

Loss of acetylcholine signaling abolishes XPA-1 Neuronal-rescue effects. (A) Scheme of acetylcholine signaling pathway. (B) Quantification of development of wild-type, neuropeptide deficient (unc-13(s69)) and neurotransmitter deficient (unc-31(e928)) lines, After 72 h of UVB irradiation at L1 stage. Data represent Mean + SD of N = 3 biological replicates. Statistical analysis: ANOVA. P-value:*<.05, **<.01, ***<.001. (C) Quantification of development of wild-type, and major neurotransmitter pathways mutants lines (dopamine (cat-2(n4547), glutamate (eat-4(ky5)), octopamine (tbh-1(n3247)), tyramine (tdc-1(n3419)), serotonin (tph-1(n4622)), acetylcholine (unc-17(e245)), GABA (unc-25(e156)), After 72 h of UVB irradiation at L1 stage. Data represent Mean + SD of N = 3 biological replicates. Statistical analysis: ANOVA. P-value:*<.05, **<.01, ***<.001. (D) Quantification of development of xpa-1(ok698) and xpa-1(ok698) mutant worms crossed with major neurotransmitter pathways mutant worms from (C), After 72 h of UVB irradiation at L1 stage (for clarity, only the name of the mutated genes are displayed). Data represent Mean + SD of N = 3 biological replicates. Statistical analysis: ANOVA. P-value:*<.05, **<.01, ***<.001. (E) Lifespan assays of wild-type and acetylcholine signaling mutant (unc-17(e245)) lines after UVB irradiation at day 1 adult stage. Representative survival curve from one individual experiment. n > 100 per condition. (F) Quantification of median lifespan and (G) maximum lifespan from survival curves displayed in (E). Data represent Mean + SEM of N = 3 biological replicates. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA followed by Post-hoc Tukey. (H) Quantification of cha-1 mRNA levels in wild-type, xpa-1(ok698) and Neuronal rescue strains, After 24 h of UVB irradiation at Day 1 adult stage. Data represents Mean + SEM of N = 4 biological replicates. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA followed by Post-hoc Tukey. (I) Quantification of development of xpa-1(ok698) and xpa-1(ok698); unc-17(e245) mutant strains, After 72 h of UVB irradiation at L1 stage. Data represent Mean + SD of N = 3 biological replicates. Statistical analysis: ANOVA. P-value:*<.05, **<.01, ***<.001.

To determine whether specific neurotransmitters are required for responding to DNA damage, we performed developmental assays after UV exposure using multiple loss-of-function/null mutant strains with defects in all major neurotransmitter signaling pathways: dopamine (cat-2(n4547)), glutamate (eat-4(ky5)), octopamine (tbh-1(n3247)), tyramine (tdc-1(n3419)), serotonin (tph-1(n4622)), ACh (unc-17(e245)), and GABA (unc-25(e156)) signaling pathways (Fig. 4A). Out of the seven mutants, only the unc-17(e245) mutant, coding for the C. elegans ortholog of the human vesicular Acetycholine transporter (VAChT) [34], showed an increased DNA damage sensitivity, with a significant decrease of fully developed adult worms upon 25 mJ/cm² UV similarly to the unc-13(s69) mutants (Fig. 4C), indicating a specific role of ACh signaling in the response to DNA damage. We next tested genetic epistasis between NER and ACh signaling. When exposed to UV, unc-17(e245); xpa-1(ok698) double mutant animals showed an increased sensitivity compared to either unc-17(e245) or xpa-1(ok698) single mutants indicating that ACh signaling is required for DNA damage resistance independently of the NER activity itself (Fig. 4D, Supplementary Fig. S2A).

To determine whether abrogation of ACh signaling also facilitates the onset of somatic decline upon DNA damage induction, we assessed the lifespan of unc-17(e245) mutants (Fig. 4E). unc-17(e245) worms display a robust reduction in median (−30%), but not maximum, lifespan even under basal conditions. Both median and maximum lifespan (−45% and −42%, respectively) were severely reduced following exposure to 100 mJ/cm² UV radiation, a dose that does not significantly impact wild-type lifespan (Fig. 4F and G). These results further support that unc-17(e245) mutant animals display DNA damage sensitivity, indicating that ACh signaling regulates C. elegans lifespan, both under normal conditions and following DNA damage.

To confirm that impaired ACh signaling is indeed responsible for increased DNA damage sensitivity, we evaluated the UV sensitivity of mutants defective in other components of the cholinergic system i.e. in addition to unc-17 and unc-13, cha-1, cho-1, and ace-1/2/3/4. cha-1 encodes for the choline acetyltransferase that synthetizes ACh using choline and acetyl-CoA [35, 36]. Following this step, ACh is then packaged into vesicles by VAChT [37] and released in SCVs into the synaptic cleft. In the synaptic cleft, ACh is degraded into choline by acetylcholine esterases encoded by ace-1/2/3/4 [35, 36]. Finally, choline can be reuptaken into the presynaptic neuron via the choline transporters encoded by cho-1 [35, 36] (Fig. 4A). When exposed to UV irradiation as L1 larvae, both cha-1(p503) (Supplementary Fig. S2B) and cho-1(tm373) (Supplementary Fig. S2C) showed increased DNA damage sensitivity as the developmental delay was more pronounced than in wild-type animals. Their sensitivity was lower than unc-17(e245) and unc-13(s69) as the decrease of fully developed animals appeared upon 50 mJ/cm² UVB. In contrast, ace-2(g72);ace-1(p1000) mutants, where ACh is stabilized, display resistance to DNA damage as the developmental arrest was mildly decreased (Supplementary Fig. S2D). These results further establish the involvement of ACh signaling in the response to DNA damage. However, ACh supplementation failed to alleviate the developmental delay in unc-17(e245) mutants (Supplementary Fig. S2E), xpa-1(ok698) or the Neuronal rescue strain (Supplementary Fig. S2F). It is, however, conceivable that the extrinsic ACh supplementation does not restore the lack of ACh release at neuronal synapsis.

In order to assess whether the production of ACh might be impacted in the xpa-1(ok698) or the Neuronal rescue strains, we assessed the mRNA levels of the rate-limiting enzyme of the ACh signaling system, encoded by the cha-1 gene, After 24 h of UV irradiation at Day 1 adult stage. We observed that cha-1 expression levels are significantly up-regulated in both xpa-1(ok698) (+102%) and the Neuronal rescue strains (+111%) when compared to wild-type (Fig. 4H). Given that ACh deficiency alone leads to developmental growth delays in NER deficient (Fig. 4D, Supplementary Fig. S2A), the strong induction of cha-1 in those two strains suggests that increased levels of ACh are required amid DNA repair deficiency. Upon UVB irradiation, we observed a significant decrease of cha-1 mRNA levels (−54%) in the xpa-1(ok698) strain while they remained unchanged in the wild-type and Neuronal rescue strains (Fig. 4H). This suggests that the neuronal DNA repair allows the maintenance of high ACh levels after DNA damage induction.

Next, we aimed to verify whether the DNA damage resistance observed in the Neuronal rescue strain was indeed mediated by ACh signaling. We generated the double mutant transgenic strain unc-17(e245);xpa-1(ok698);[prgef-1::gfp::xpa-1;punc-122::gfp] (i.e. Neuronal rescue; unc-17(e245)) and assessed the sensitivity to DNA damage during development of these animals whose NER activity is restricted to the neurons and whose ACh signaling is blunted. We observed that with UVB doses that allow almost all Neuronal rescue animals to reach adulthood (4 mJ/cm²), the Neuronal rescue; unc-17(e245) strain showed a significantly reduced proportion of fully developed adult worms, and at higher dose (8 mJ/cm²) the UV resistance of Neuronal rescue animals was significantly abolished by the unc-17(e245) mutation (Fig. 4I, Supplementary Fig. S2A). These results indicate that the organism’s DNA damage resistance mediated by neuron-specific-DNA repair requires ACh signaling.

Neuronal DNA repair maintains systemic mitochondrial function

Mitochondrial dysfunction was observed in xpa-1 mutant C. elegans and mice and was suggested to result from the deprivation of NAD + pools amid nuclear DNA damage (as NER has been established to strictly operate in the nucleus but is absent in mitochondria) [38]. ACh has been implicated in stress resistance signaling pathways in cardiomyocytes by regulating mitochondrial dynamics/function [39–41]. We thus hypothesized that ACh signaling could impact the animal’s DNA damage sensitivity by boosting mitochondrial activity. Accordingly, disruption of ACh signaling would result in systemic mitochondrial dysfunction upon DNA damage. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed mitochondrial activity in the different neuronal strains as well as in xpa-1(ok698) mutants. The difference of proton concentration between each side of the inner mitochondrial membrane; also called mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) is dependent on several important features of mitochondrial health such as ATP production and membrane integrity. Thus, its measurement is commonly used as a proxy to mitochondrial health. To measure MMP, we used the positively charged fluorescent dye Tetramethylrhodamin-Ethylester (TMRE), that accumulates in the relative negative matrix of active mitochondria. [42, 43].

We analyzed the effects of DNA damage induction in neuropeptide (unc-13(s69)) and neurotransmitter (unc-31(e928)) deficient strains. In line with their respective sensitivity to DNA damage (Fig. 4B), animals lacking a functional neurotransmitter pathway showed strongly reduced MMP levels (−85%), while the lack of a functional neuropeptide pathway had no effect (Fig. 5A and B). Moreover, ACh deficient unc-17(e245) mutants showed decreased MMP levels in non-DNA damage condition (−49%) that is further exacerbated upon DNA damage (−75%) (Fig. 5C and D). These results show that mitochondrial activity is impaired in ACh signaling mutants, particularly upon DNA damage. To verify that mitochondrial health is also affected in NER deficient animals, we performed the same test in xpa-1(ok698). We observed a significant decrease in MMP following DNA damage induction (−49%) suggesting that impaired mitochondrial function is triggered in response to unrepaired nuclear DNA damage (Fig. 5E and F).

Figure 5.

Pictures and graphics showing the effects of UVB induced DNA damage on mitochondrial activity in wild-type C. elegans, XPA-1 mutant and the XPA-1 neuronal rescue as well as the cumulative impacts of mitochondrial dysfunction and XPA-1 neuronal rescue after UVB induced DNA damage.

Mitochondrial activity mediates the systemic effect of neuronal xpa-1 rescue. (A) Representative picture of TMRE staining of wild-type, neurotransmitter deficient (unc-13(s69)) and neuropeptide deficient (unc-31(e928)) strains, After 24 h of UVB irradiation at Day 1 adult stage. Scale bar = 50 µm. (B) Quantification of mitochondrial membrane potential using TMRE staining of wild-type, neurotransmitter deficient (unc-13(s69)) and neuropeptide deficient (unc-31(e928)) strains, After 24 h of UVB irradiation at Day 1 adult stage. Data represent Mean + SEM of N = 3 biological replicates. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA followed by Post-hoc Tukey. (C) Representative picture of TMRE staining of wild-type and Ach-signaling deficient strain unc-17(e245), 24 h after UVB irradiation at Day 1 adult stage. Scale bar = 50 µm. (D) Quantification of mitochondrial membrane potential using TMRE staining of wild-type and Ach-signaling deficient strain unc-17(e245), 24 h after UVB irradiation at Day 1 adult stage. Data represent Mean + SEM of N = 4 biological replicates. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA followed by Post-hoc Tukey. (E) Representative picture of TMRE staining of wild-type and xpa-1(ok698) strains, 24 h after UVB irradiation at Day 1 adult stage. Scale bar = 50 µm. (F) Quantification of mitochondrial membrane potential using TMRE staining of wild-type and xpa-1(ok698) strains, 24 h after UVB irradiation at Day 1 adult stage. Data represent Mean + SEM of N = 3 biological replicates. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA followed by Post-hoc Tukey. (G) Presense Oxodish measurement of oxygen concentration in wells seeded with wild-type, xpa-1(ok698) and Neuronal rescue strains, during 36 h, starting 24 h after UVB irradiation at Day 1 adult stage. Representative measurement from one biological replicate. (H) Quantification of oxygen consumption rate from curves displayed in panel (D). Data represent Mean + SEM of N = 3 biological replicates. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA followed by Post-hoc Tukey. (I) Oroboros measurement of phosphorylating respiration of wild-type, xpa-1(ok698) and Neuronal rescue strains, 24 h after UVB irradiation at Day 1 adult stage. Data represent Mean + SEM of N = 3 biological replicates. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA followed by Post-hoc Tukey. (J) Quantification of development of wild-type and mitochondrial fusion mutant fzo-1(tm1133), NER deficient xpa-1(ok698), Neuronal rescue and Neuronal rescue;fzo-1(tm1133) strains, 72 h after UVB irradiation at L1 stage. Data represent Mean + SD of N = 3 biological replicates. Statistical analysis: ANOVA. P-value:*<.05, **<.01, ***<.001.

Next, we analyzed mitochondrial activity in wild-type, xpa-1(ok698) mutants and Neuronal rescue after UV exposure at Day 1 adult stage. To more directly evaluate mitochondrial activity, we made use of two devices measuring oxygen consumption. The first one, the Presens Oxysensor, allowed us to monitor the global oxygen consumption for a period spanning 36 h following DNA damage induction. The second, the Oroboros system, allowed us to measure oxidative phosphorylation, 24 h after DNA damage induction. Our Oxysensor measures showed that after UV exposure, xpa-1(ok698) mutants have a strongly decreased respiration rate compared to control worms (−71%). On the contrary, Neuronal rescue worms showed no significant difference in oxygen consumption (Fig. 5G and H). Accordingly, the oxidative phosphorylation in xpa-1(ok698) mutants after UV exposure was reduced (−54%) compared to wild-type, while Neuronal rescue animals showed no decrease (Fig. 5I). These results indicate that after DNA damage, NER activity in neurons is sufficient to maintain the whole organism’s mitochondrial activity.

Animals that are defective in mitochondrial fusion (fzo-1(tm1133)), a mechanism necessary for correct mitochondrial activity were recently observed to be hypersensitive to UV [44]. Accordingly, we observed a striking developmental delay after UV exposure in fzo-1(tm1133) mutants (Fig. 5J). We also observed that, when we ablate mitochondrial activity in the Neuronal rescue strain using the newly generated strain: fzo-1(tm1133);xpa-1(ok698);[prgef-1::gfp::xpa-1;punc-122::gfp] (i.e. fzo-1(tm1133)+Neuronal rescue), the efficiency of the Neuronal rescue to revert DNA damage sensitivity is completely ablated (Fig. 5J). These results establish the role of mitochondrial activity in the rescue of DNA damage sensitivity due to neuron-specific DNA repair.

Taken together, these data show that, in C. elegans, neuronal repair is sufficient to confer DNA damage resilience, which requires ACh signaling and the maintenance of mitochondrial activity (Fig. 6). Based on our work, it will be interesting to further explore how ACh signaling regulates mitochondrial activity.

Figure 6.

Schematic description of the proposed model. Upon UVB DNA damage induction, neuronal XPA-1 allows maintenance of neurons and neuronal pathways such as the acetylcholine pathway. The maintenance of the acetylcholine pathway allows the continuation of muscular activity by maintaining mitochondrial activity, ensuring C. elegans health.

Proposed model. In wild-type C. elegans, bulky adducts are normally repaired by the nucleotide excision repair pathway. In xpa-1(ok698) mutant strain, NER is fully ablated and bulky adducts remain in the genome, leading to genetic stress, decreased fitness and premature death. In our xpa-1 re-expression strain (Neuronal rescue), we propose that ① bulky lesions are removed in neurons by the NER pathway allowing their survival. Thus ② maintaining neuronal signaling and more specifically acetylcholine signaling. Acetylcholine signaling maintenance allows the maintenance of high mitochondrial activity after UV irradiation and promotes muscle activity. We propose that ③ recovery of the neuromuscular axis promotes movement, development and ultimately rescues DNA damage sensitivity.

Discussion

Thus far, DNA repair deficiency in specific organs has been shown to exert systemic pathological consequences. For example, hematopoietic NER deficiency in mice was shown to lead to cellular senescence in other, repair proficient, cell types in mice [45]. Moreover, DNA damage-triggered dysfunction in specific organs can compromise the function of other organ systems, for example, chronic liver disease, often triggered by oxidative stress and inflammation [46] was associated with multiple other pathologies [47]; and kidney insufficiency elevates a broad range of age-related disease risks as hypertension and diabetes [48, 49]. Here, we report the opposite scenario: we probed the consequences of cell-type specific DNA repair recovery and observed that XPA-1 re-expression in either intestinal, muscle or neuronal cells can contribute to some degree to organismal resistance to DNA damage.

Strikingly, the repair of DNA lesions in neurons has the broadest effect on the organism’s ability to tolerate DNA damage, allowing developmental growth and adult survival while maintaining not only neuronal but also muscle functions. This could be explained by the maintenance of a tissue that is normally very sensitive. Indeed, mature neurons are described as sensitive to DNA damage due to general lower DNA repair efficiency [50, 51] and lower threshold for apoptosis [52]. Moreover, re-expression of the NER component XPF in a tissue-specific manner confirms that muscular cells are also less sensitive to DNA damage [53]. Here, we observed a clear and previously unknown effect of NER activity in neurons on the whole organism.

We determined that ACh signaling is essential to achieve this resilience in peripheral tissue types. ACh signaling is an important component of neuronal signaling [54] that among a range of functions sets the capacity to tolerate protein folding stress [55] and impacts the mitochondrial stress response [56]. Here, we show that loss of ACh signaling leads to a strong DNA damage sensitivity.

Growing evidence shows that the DNA damage response and mitochondrial activity are interconnected. It was proposed that mitochondrial NAD+ reserves are deprived and Sirtuin levels decreased amid persistent DNA lesions [57], resulting in decreased PGC1α and FOXOs levels leading to altered mitochondrial morphology [58, 59]. Vice versa, dysfunctional mitochondrial dynamics also leads to increased DNA damage sensitivity [44]. Here, we demonstrated that the recovery of NER in neurons leads to maintenance of mitochondrial activity after UV-induced DNA damage in peripheral tissues. This shows for the first time that alterations in the genome maintenance of one cell type not only impacts the mitochondria of the affected cell but also mitochondria in other cells. As mitochondria can operate as a hub for many different signaling pathways [60, 61], it will be interesting to further explore the organismal consequences of restored mitochondrial activity amid DNA damage accumulation.

The mechanism by which ACh maintains mitochondrial activity after DNA damage remains unexplored. Mitochondria have the capacity to sense ACh, notably as they express several nicotinic acetylcholine receptor [62] and activation of such receptors prevents mtDNA release [63]. Moreover, impairment of ACh signaling leads to increase in mtUPS [56]. However, our results show that treating the animals with ACh is not sufficient to mimic DNA repair effects in neurons potentially due to inadequacy of extrinsic supplementation to affect the ACh availability at a synapsis. Indeed, the loss of acetylcholine esterase did not lead to DNA damage sensitivity indicating that, contrary to ACh per se, it is the maintenance of the neuronal ACh influx that leads to maintenance of mitochondrial activity in other tissues.

We thus propose that neuronal DNA repair is decisive for C. elegans overall susceptibility to DNA damage. The organismal response to DNA damage critically depends on mitochondrial activity, which can be modulated via neuronal ACh signaling. Our results for the first time establish that not only cell type specific DNA repair deficiency but also cell type specific DNA repair determines the organism’s ability to grow and survive amid DNA damage infliction.

Supplementary Material

gkag976_Supplemental_Files

Acknowledgements

Nematode strains were provided by the National Bioresource Project (supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan), the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (funded by the NIH National Center for Research Resources, US), and the C. elegans Gene Knockout Project at the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation (part of the International C. elegans Gene Knockout Consortium). We thank Walter Sandt for providing help for statistical analysis.

The final model and the graphical abstract were created in BioRender. Schumacher, B. (2026) https://BioRender.com/ypsaa56 and https://BioRender.com/tbsnnu6, respectively.

Author contributions: Paulo Francisco Lopes da Silva (Conceptualization [equal], Data curation [equal], Formal analysis [equal], Investigation [equal], Writing – original draft [equal]), Baptiste Ropert (Conceptualization [equal], Data curation [equal], Formal analysis [equal], Investigation [equal], Methodology [equal], Writing – original draft [equal], Writing – review & editing [equal]), Devin Mares (Investigation [supporting]), Matthias Rieckher (Conceptualization [equal], Data curation [supporting], Investigation [supporting], Methodology [supporting]), Corvin Rive (Data curation [supporting], Formal analysis [supporting], Investigation [supporting]), and Björn Schumacher (Conceptualization [lead], Writing – original draft [equal], Writing – review & editing [equal], Funding acquisition [lead])

Contributor Information

Paulo Francisco Lopes da Silva, Institute for Genome Stability in Aging and Disease, Medical Faculty, University and University Hospital of Cologne, 50931Cologne, Germany; CECAD, Cologne Cluster of Excellence in Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, 50931Cologne, Germany.

Baptiste Ropert, Institute for Genome Stability in Aging and Disease, Medical Faculty, University and University Hospital of Cologne, 50931Cologne, Germany; CECAD, Cologne Cluster of Excellence in Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, 50931Cologne, Germany.

Devin Mares, Institute for Genome Stability in Aging and Disease, Medical Faculty, University and University Hospital of Cologne, 50931Cologne, Germany; CECAD, Cologne Cluster of Excellence in Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, 50931Cologne, Germany.

Matthias Rieckher, Institute for Genome Stability in Aging and Disease, Medical Faculty, University and University Hospital of Cologne, 50931Cologne, Germany; CECAD, Cologne Cluster of Excellence in Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, 50931Cologne, Germany.

Corvin Rive, Institute for Genome Stability in Aging and Disease, Medical Faculty, University and University Hospital of Cologne, 50931Cologne, Germany; CECAD, Cologne Cluster of Excellence in Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, 50931Cologne, Germany.

Björn Schumacher, Institute for Genome Stability in Aging and Disease, Medical Faculty, University and University Hospital of Cologne, 50931Cologne, Germany; CECAD, Cologne Cluster of Excellence in Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, 50931Cologne, Germany.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data is available at NAR online.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Funding

P.L.d.S. received support from the Cologne Graduate School of Ageing Research. B.S. acknowledges funding from the European Research Council (ERC-2023-SyG, 101118919), the Hevolution Foundation (HF-GRO-23-1199212-35), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Reinhart Koselleck-Project 524088035, FOR 5504 project 496650118, FOR 5762 project 531902955, SFB 1678, SFB 1607, CECAD EXC 2030-390661388, DFG-ISF project 561031107, ANR-DFG project 545378328, and the DFG project grants 558166204, 540136447, 496914708, 437825591, 437407415, and 418036758), the José Carreras Leukemia Foundation, DJCLS 04 R/2023, the Deutsche Krebshilfe (70114555), the John Templeton Foundation Grant (61734), and the Bundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt (BMFTR) X-AGE project 02NUK105B. Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by the University of Cologne.

Data availability

Original data are provided in the source data file.

References

  • 1. De Bont  R, van Larebeke  N. Endogenous DNA damage in humans: a review of quantitative data. Mutagenesis. 2004;19:169–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Moskalev  AA, Shaposhnikov  MV, Plyusnina  EN  et al.  The role of DNA damage and repair in aging through the prism of Koch-like criteria. Ageing Res Rev. 2013;12:661–84. 10.1016/j.arr.2012.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Groelly  FJ, Fawkes  M, Dagg  RA  et al.  Targeting DNA damage response pathways in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2023;23:78–94. 10.1038/s41568-022-00535-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Schumacher  B, Pothof  J, Vijg  J  et al.  The central role of DNA damage in the ageing process. Nature. 2021;592:695–703. 10.1038/s41586-021-03307-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. da Silva  PFL, Schumacher  B. Principles of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of aging. J Invest Dermatol. 2021;141:951–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Nunomiya  A, Szakal  B, Branzei  D. SnapShot: DNA repair pathways. Mol Cell. 2024;84:180–180.e1. 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Bujarrabal-Dueso  A, Sendtner  G, Meyer  DH  et al.  The DREAM complex functions as conserved master regulator of somatic DNA-repair capacities. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2023;30:475–88. 10.1038/s41594-023-00942-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Abeti  R, Zeitlberger  A, Peelo  C  et al.  Xeroderma pigmentosum: overview of pharmacology and novel therapeutic strategies for neurological symptoms. British J Pharmacol. 2019;176:4293–301. 10.1111/bph.14557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Anttinen  A, Koulu  L, Nikoskelainen  E  et al.  Neurological symptoms and natural course of xeroderma pigmentosum. Brain. 2008;131:1979–89. 10.1093/brain/awn126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Niedernhofer  LJ. Tissue-specific accelerated aging in nucleotide excision repair deficiency. Mech Ageing Dev. 2008;129:408–15. 10.1016/j.mad.2008.04.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Karikkineth  AC, Scheibye-Knudsen  M, Fivenson  E  et al.  Cockayne syndrome: clinical features, model systems and pathways. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;33:3–17. 10.1016/j.arr.2016.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Faghri  S, Tamura  D, Kraemer  KH  et al.  Trichothiodystrophy: a systematic review of 112 published cases characterises a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. J Med Genet. 2008;45:609–21. 10.1136/jmg.2008.058743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Camenisch  U, Dip  R, Schumacher  SB  et al.  Recognition of helical kinks by xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein triggers DNA excision repair. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006;13:278–84. 10.1038/nsmb1061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Missura  M, Buterin  T, Hindges  R  et al.  Double-check probing of DNA bending and unwinding by XPA–RPA: an architectural function in DNA repair. EMBO J. 2001;20:3554–64. 10.1093/emboj/20.13.3554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Spivak  G. Nucleotide excision repair in humans. DNA Repair. 2015;36:13–8. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.09.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Sugitani  N, Sivley  RM, Perry  KE  et al.  XPA: a key scaffold for human nucleotide excision repair. DNA Repair. 2016;44:123–35. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.05.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Astin  JW, O’Neil  NJ, Kuwabara  PE. Nucleotide excision repair and the degradation of RNA pol II by the Caenorhabditis elegans XPA and Rsp5 orthologues, RAD-3 and WWP-1. DNA Repair. 2008;7:267–80. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Lans  H, Marteijn  JA, Schumacher  B  et al.  Involvement of global genome repair, transcription coupled repair, and chromatin remodeling in UV DNA damage response changes during development. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1000941. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Rieckher  M, Bujarrabal  A, Doll  MA  et al.  A simple answer to complex questions: Caenorhabditis elegans as an experimental model for examining the DNA damage response and disease genes. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233:2781–90. 10.1002/jcp.25979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Wilson  DM  III, Rieckher  M, Williams  AB, Schumacher  B. Systematic analysis of DNA crosslink repair pathways during development and aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:9467–80. 10.1093/nar/gkx660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Meyer  JN, Boyd  WA, Azzam  GA  et al.  Decline of nucleotide excision repair capacity in aging Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R70. 10.1186/gb-2007-8-5-r70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Stergiou  L, Doukoumetzidis  K, Sendoel  A  et al.  The nucleotide excision repair pathway is required for UV-C-induced apoptosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:1129–38. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Mueller  MM, Castells-Roca  L, Babu  V  et al.  DAF-16/FOXO and EGL-27/GATA promote developmental growth in response to persistent somatic DNA damage. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16:1168–79. 10.1038/ncb3071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Rieckher  M, Bujarrabal  A, Doll  MA  et al.  A simple answer to complex questions: Caenorhabditis elegans as an experimental model for examining the DNA damage response and disease genes. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233:2781–90. 10.1002/jcp.25979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kenyon  C, Chang  J, Gensch  E  et al.  A C. elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type. Nature. 1993;366:461–4. 10.1038/366461a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Collins  JJ, Huang  C, Hughes  S  et al.  The measurement and analysis of age-related changes in Caenorhabditis elegans. WormBook. 2007;1–21. https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/open_access_pubs/3461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Huang  C, Xiong  C, Kornfeld  K. Measurements of age-related changes of physiological processes that predict lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:8084–9. 10.1073/pnas.0400848101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Perkins  LA, Hedgecock  EM, Thomson  JN  et al.  Mutant sensory cilia in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1986;117:456–87. 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90314-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Inglis  PN, Ou  G, Leroux  MR  et al.  The sensory cilia of Caenorhabditis elegans. WormBook. 2007;1–22. 10.1895/wormbook.1.126.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Efstathiou  S, Ottens  F, Schütter  L-S  et al.  ER-associated RNA silencing promotes ER quality control. Nat Cell Biol. 2022;24:1714–25. 10.1038/s41556-022-01025-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Richmond  JE, Davis  WS, Jorgensen  EM. UNC-13 is required for synaptic vesicle fusion in C. elegans. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:959–64. 10.1038/14755 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Madison  JM, Nurrish  S, Kaplan  JM. UNC-13 Interaction with syntaxin is required for synaptic transmission. Curr Biol. 2005;15:2236–42. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Speese  S, Petrie  M, Schuske  K  et al.  UNC-31 (CAPS) is required for dense-core vesicle but not synaptic vesicle exocytosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 2007;27:6150–62. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1466-07.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Alfonso  A, Grundahl  K, Duerr  JS  et al.  The Caenorhabditis elegans unc-17 gene: a putative vesicular acetylcholine transporter. Science. 1993;261:617–9. 10.1126/science.8342028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Halder  N, Lal  G. Cholinergic system and its therapeutic importance in inflammation and autoimmunity. Front Immunol. 2021;12:660342. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.660342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Treinin  M, Jin  Y. Cholinergic transmission in C. elegans: functions, diversity, and maturation of ACh-activated ion channels. J Neurochem. 2021;158:1274–91. 10.1111/jnc.15164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Varoqui  H, Erickson  JD. Active transport of acetylcholine by the human vesicular acetylcholine transporter. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:27229–32. 10.1074/jbc.271.44.27229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Fang  EF, Scheibye-Knudsen  M, Chua  KF  et al.  Nuclear DNA damage signalling to mitochondria in ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17:308–21. 10.1038/nrm.2016.14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Sun  L, Zhao  M, Yu  X-J  et al.  Cardioprotection by acetylcholine: a novel mechanism via mitochondrial biogenesis and function involving the PGC-1α pathway. J Cell Physiol. 2013;228:1238–48. 10.1002/jcp.24277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Sun  L, Zhao  M, Yang  Y  et al.  Acetylcholine attenuates hypoxia/reoxygenation injury by inducing mitophagy through PINK1/Parkin signal pathway in H9c2 cells. J Cell Physiol. 2016;231:1171–81. 10.1002/jcp.25215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Xu  M, Bi  X, He  X  et al.  Inhibition of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response by acetylcholine alleviated hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced apoptosis of endothelial cells. Cell Cycle. 2016;15:1331–43. 10.1080/15384101.2016.1160985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Sakamuru  S, Attene-Ramos  MS, Xia  M. Mitochondrial membrane potential assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1473:17–22. 10.1007/978-1-4939-6346-1  10.1007/978-1-4939-6346-1_2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Crowley  LC, Christensen  ME, Waterhouse  NJ. Measuring mitochondrial transmembrane potential by TMRE staining. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2016;2016:pdb.prot087361, 10.1101/pdb.prot087361 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Martirosyan  A, Li  Y, Woitzat  Y  et al.  Ultraviolet B acts as a dietary restriction mimetic by targeting mitochondrial bioenergetics. bioRxiv, 10.1101/2024.03.05.583543, 6 March 2024, preprint: not peer reviewed [DOI]
  • 45. Goulielmaki  E, Ioannidou  A, Tsekrekou  M  et al.  Tissue-infiltrating macrophages mediate an exosome-based metabolic reprogramming upon DNA damage. Nat Commun. 2020;11:42. 10.1038/s41467-019-13894-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Gillman  R, Lopes Floro  K, Wankell  M  et al.  The role of DNA damage and repair in liver cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2021;1875:188493. 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188493 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Gan  C, Yuan  Y, Shen  H  et al.  Liver diseases: epidemiology, causes, trends and predictions. Sig Transduct Target Ther. 2025;10:33. 10.1038/s41392-024-02072-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Romagnani  P, Agarwal  R, Chan  JCN  et al.  Chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025;11:8. 10.1038/s41572-024-00589-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. MacRae  C, Mercer  SW, Guthrie  B  et al.  Comorbidity in chronic kidney disease: a large cross-sectional study of prevalence in Scottish primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2021;71:e243–9. 10.3399/bjgp20X714125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Yamamoto  A, Itoh  K, Shinno  H  et al.  Neurons and astrocytes exhibit lower activities of global genome nucleotide excision repair than do fibroblasts. Neurosci Res. 2007;58:S90. 10.1016/j.neures.2007.06.1092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Meador  JA, Balajee  AS. Analysis of ionizing radiation induced DNA damage response in human adult stem cells and differentiated neurons. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2022;878:503486. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2022.503486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Gobbel  GT, Bellinzona  M, Vogt  AR  et al.  Response of postmitotic neurons to X-Irradiation: implications for the role of DNA damage in neuronal apoptosis. J Neurosci. 1998;18:147–55. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-01-00147.1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Sabatella  M, Thijssen  KL, Davó-Martínez  C  et al.  Tissue-specific DNA repair activity of ERCC-1/XPF-1. Cell Rep. 2021;34:108608. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108608 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Picciotto  MR, Higley  MJ, Mineur  YS. Acetylcholine as a neuromodulator: cholinergic signaling shapes nervous system function and behavior. Neuron. 2012;76:116–29. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Gallrein  C, Williams  AB, Meyer  DH  et al.  baz-2 enhances systemic proteostasis in vivo by regulating acetylcholine metabolism. Cell Rep. 2023;42:113577. 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Cornell  R, Cao  W, Harradine  B  et al.  Neuro-intestinal acetylcholine signalling regulates the mitochondrial stress response in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Commun. 2024;15:6594. 10.1038/s41467-024-50973-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Okur  MN, Fang  EF, Fivenson  EM  et al.  Cockayne syndrome proteins CSA and CSB maintain mitochondrial homeostasis through NAD+ signaling. Aging Cell. 2020;19:e13268. 10.1111/acel.13268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Lopes  AFC, Bozek  K, Herholz  M  et al.  A C. elegans model for neurodegeneration in cockayne syndrome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:10973–85. 10.1093/nar/gkaa795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Ropert  B, Gallrein  C, Schumacher  B. DNA repair deficiencies and neurodegeneration. DNA Repair. 2024;138:103679. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2024.103679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Picard  M, Shirihai  OS. Mitochondrial signal transduction. Cell Metab. 2022;34:1620–53. 10.1016/j.cmet.2022.10.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Dache  ZAA, Thierry  AR. Mitochondria-derived cell-to-cell communication. Cell Rep. 2023;42:112728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Lykhmus  O, Gergalova  G, Koval  L  et al.  Mitochondria express several nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes to control various pathways of apoptosis induction. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2014;53:246–52. 10.1016/j.biocel.2014.05.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Lu  B, Kwan  K, Levine  YA  et al.  α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine receptor signaling inhibits inflammasome activation by preventing mitochondrial DNA release. Mol Med. 2014;20:350–8. 10.2119/molmed.2013.00117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Brenner  S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;77:71–94. 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Rieckher  M, Tavernarakis  N. Generation of Caenorhabditis elegans transgenic animals by DNA microinjection. Bio Protoc. 2017;7:e2565. 10.21769/BioProtoc.2565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Nussbaum-Krammer  CI, Neto  MF, Brielmann  RM  et al.  Investigating the spreading and toxicity of Prion-like proteins using the metazoan model organism C. elegans. J Vis Exp. 2015;8:52321. 10.3791/52321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Efstathiou  S, Ottens  F, Schütter  L-S  et al.  ER-associated RNA silencing promotes ER quality control. Nat Cell Biol. 2022;24:1714–25. 10.1038/s41556-022-01025-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Livak  KJ, Schmittgen  TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

gkag976_Supplemental_Files

Data Availability Statement

Original data are provided in the source data file.


Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES