ABSTRACT
Conventional ABX 3 perovskites place organic species at A‐sites or as X‐site linkers, where the B‐site is reserved for metals. Molecular double perovskites with a general formula A 2 B I B III X 6 possess higher tunability and distinct B I‐sites that can accommodate small cations, further regulating lattice connectivity and physical properties. Here, we introduce a new family of B I‐site‐organic nitrate double perovskites, (RM3HQ)2 B IEu(NO3)6 (RM3HQ = (R)‐N‐methyl‐3‐hydroxyquinuclidinium), forming compounds 1 – 4 with B I = ammonium, methylammonium, formamidinium, and dimethylammonium, respectively. Compounds 1 and 2 adopt mixed corner‐/face‐sharing non‐perovskite structures, whereas 3 and 4 form double perovskites. This structural variation raises the ferroelectric phase‐transition temperature to 349 K in 4 and 414 K in 3, much higher than that of the inorganic analogue (T c = 285 K). This further widens the temperature margin for stable room‐temperature piezoelectric responses, as demonstrated in 3 by ferroelectric hysteresis loops, ferroelastic domains, and a large piezoelectric coefficient (|d 33| ≈ 56 pC N−1). During these phase transitions, the Eu3+ photoluminescence intensity ratio (616 nm/ 592 nm) increases from 0.32 to 2.92 in 3 and from 0.37 to 4.59 in 4, reflecting transition‐related changes in the ligand field. This work highlights the B I‐site as an effective handle for tuning ferroelectric phase‐transition temperatures and tunable Eu3+ photoluminescence.
Keywords: ferroelectric phase transitions, luminescence, molecular double perovskites, molecular engineering, piezoelectricity
This study reports molecularly engineered nitrate double perovskites based on systematic B I‐site cation substitution. This molecular engineering modulates local B I···NO3 interactions, nitrate connectivity, and collective physical responses, accompanied by structural conversion from mixed corner‐/face‐sharing structures to three‐dimensional corner‐sharing double perovskites. The resulting materials exhibit elevated ferroelectric phase‐transition temperatures, a large piezoelectric response, ferroelasticity, and Eu3+ luminescence responses, establishing B I‐site molecular engineering as a strategy for multifunctional molecular materials.

1. Introduction
Hybrid perovskites display rich structural diversity, in which subtle structural changes can produce pronounced physical responses [1, 2]. Molecular motion and octahedral connectivity are key factors that drive symmetry breaking, giving rise to ferroelectricity, piezoelectricity, ferroelasticity, and nonlinear‐optical responses [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. In hybrid ABX 3 perovskites, organic species can occupy the A‐site or serve as X‐site linkers in metal–organic variants [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. The B‐site, however, remains occupied by metal cations in BX 6 octahedra.
Metal‐free perovskites have shown that ammonium cations can occupy the B‐site, but these materials do not contain metal‐centered BX 6 octahedra [16, 17, 18, 19]. In this context, molecular double perovskites (A 2 B I B III X 6) can accommodate an organic ammonium cation at the B I‐site and a metal cation at the B III‐site. Reported examples are mainly one‐dimensional hexagonal double perovskites, which have shown tunable ferroelectric, antiferroelectric, and luminescent responses [20, 21, 22, 23]. However, three‐dimensional (3D) corner‐sharing structures with B I‐site organic ammonium cations remain rare.
Nitrate‐based rare‐earth molecular double perovskites are well suited to this context because their A 2 B I[Ln(NO3)6] structures place Ln3+ at the B III‐site and retain a distinct B I‐site for small cations within a 3D corner‐sharing arrangement [24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45]. These B I‐site variations offer a means of tuning both the phase‐transition behavior and luminescence of Eu‐based nitrate molecular double perovskites. A representative example is a previously reported molecular double perovskite that exhibits ferroelectric and piezoelectric responses together with Eu3+ emission but undergoes a phase transition at only 285 K, leaving a narrow operating window for room‐temperature piezoelectric response [28]. This limitation motivates efforts to raise the transition temperature well above room temperature. Replacing the inorganic Rb+ at the B I‐site with NH4 + or small organic ammonium cations introduces hydrogen bonding and thermally activated reorientational motion, which can in turn modulate the local B I···NO3 interactions, nitrate connectivity, and ultimately the phase‐transition temperature [24, 25]. Such local structural changes can be probed by temperature‐dependent Eu3+ luminescence, where the PL intensity ratio between emissions at 616 and 592 nm (I616/I592) serves as an intrinsic optical signature of ligand‐field variations across the structural phase transitions [46, 47, 48].
In this work, guided by the chemical design principles of ferroelectrochemistry [49, 50], we chose the chiral (R)‐N‐methyl‐3‐hydroxyquinuclidinium (RM3HQ+) cation as the A‐site component, thereby establishing a common chiral molecular environment across the series. We prepared compounds 1–4 by varying the B I‐site cation in the molecular double‐perovskite (RM3HQ)2 B IEu(NO3)6, using NH4 +, methylammonium (MA+), formamidinium (FA+), and dimethylammonium (DMA+), respectively. These B I‐site cations differ in molecular geometry, size, steric effects, and N–H donor arrangement, enabling us to examine how B I‐site substitution influences nitrate connectivity and ferroic phase transitions. Compounds 1 and 2 adopt mixed corner‐/face‐sharing non‐perovskite structures, whereas 3 and 4 form 3D corner‐sharing double perovskites. The ferroelectric transition temperatures are elevated to 414 K in 3 and 349 K in 4. Across these transitions, the Eu3+ emission ratio I616/I592 reflects the phase‐transition‐induced ligand‐field changes. These results establish the underexplored molecular tunability of the B I‐site as an effective handle for tuning ferroic phase‐transition temperatures and for probing ligand‐field changes through Eu3+ luminescence in hybrid systems.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Synthesis and Crystal Structures
The four new compounds, (RM3HQ)2 B IEu(NO3)6, were obtained as colorless block‐shaped crystals, with B I = NH4 +, MA+, FA+, and DMA+ for 1–4, respectively (Figure S1; synthetic details in the Supporting Information). Experimental powder X‐ray diffraction patterns agree well with those simulated from the single‐crystal structures, confirming the phase purity of the bulk samples (Figure S2). Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction (SCXRD) established the structures of 1–4; crystallographic data and refinement parameters are compiled in Tables S1–S3.
The general formula can be described in terms of three structural components (Figure 1a): the chiral A‐site cation RM3HQ+, the Eu(NO3)6 coordination unit, and the variable B I‐site cation. From the viewpoint of overall octahedral connectivity, SCXRD reveals two B I‐dependent structure types (Figure 1b,c). Compounds 1 and 2 adopt Type I 3D non‐perovskite structures, featuring mixed corner‐ and face‐sharing connections between Eu(NO3)6 and B I(NO3)6 units. In contrast, compounds 3 and 4 form Type II 3D corner‐sharing double‐perovskite structures. This difference is most clearly seen in the local B I(NO3)6 units (Figure 1d). In 1 and 2, the smaller NH4 + and MA+ cations organize three neighboring nitrate groups into a hydrogen‐bonded triad through directional N–H···O contacts, giving rise to the face‐sharing component. In 3 and 4, the larger FA+ and DMA+ cations are associated with a more open nitrate arrangement and purely corner‐sharing connectivity. These observations suggest that the size and hydrogen‐bonding behavior of the B I‐site ammonium cations control the local nitrate arrangement and overall connectivity.
FIGURE 1.

(a) General formula and structural components: the (R)‐N‐methyl‐3‐hydroxyquinuclidinium cation (RM3HQ+), B I‐site cations, and Eu(NO3)6 units. (b,c) B I‐dependent structure types: Type I 3D non‐perovskite structures for 1 and 2, and Type II 3D double‐perovskite structures for 3 and 4. (d) Local B I(NO3)6 unit with N–H···O contacts shown as cyan dashed lines. In 1 and 2, the orange shared face is formed by a hydrogen‐bonded NO3 − triad. Polyhedra: B I(NO3)6, light blue; Eu(NO3)6, light orange. Atoms: C, gray; H, white; N, blue; O, red; Eu, yellow.
Compared with our previously reported Rb+ and K+ analogues, the overall connectivity correlates with the average B I···Eu separation: shorter separations generally give mixed corner‐/face‐sharing connectivity, whereas longer separations correspond to purely corner‐sharing structures (Table S4) [28, 37]. However, the size of the B I‐site cation is not the only factor governing connectivity selection. The La analogue, (RM3HQ)2NH4La(NO3)6, adopts a corner‐sharing double‐perovskite structure despite containing the same NH4 + cation as 1, indicating that the lanthanide ionic radius also influences the resulting connectivity [25]. Thus, the present Eu‐based series highlights the role of B I‐site substitution in regulating framework connectivity, while the influence of the Ln3+ ionic radius should also be considered when extending this strategy to related rare‐earth systems. Compounds 3 and 4, with their well‐defined 3D corner‐sharing double‐perovskite structures, enable examination of the order–disorder dynamics discussed below.
2.2. Structural Phase Transitions of 3 and 4
Variable‐temperature SCXRD reveals stepwise symmetry evolution in both 3 and 4. Compound 3 adopts a polar C2 room‐temperature phase (RTP); on heating, it transforms through a nonpolar R32 intermediate‐temperature phase (ITP) into a cubic F432 high‐temperature phase (HTP), with the three phases characterized by SCXRD at 293, 420, and 433 K, respectively (Figure 2). Compound 4 undergoes the same C2 → R32 → F432 pathway, with its three phases characterized at 300, 353, and 373 K (Figure S5).
FIGURE 2.

Variable‐temperature crystal structures of compound 3. RTP, ITP, and HTP denote the room‐temperature, intermediate‐temperature, and high‐temperature phases, respectively. (a–c) Crystal structures of the RTP (293 K, C2), ITP (420 K, R32), and HTP (433 K, F432) phases, with local B I(NO3)6 coordination environments and packing views shown for each phase. Red spheres denote nitrate groups; blue and pink octahedra denote B I(NO3)6 and Eu(NO3)6 units; cyan dashed lines indicate N–H···O hydrogen bonds. Atom colors: C, gray; H, white; N, blue; O, red.
In compound 3, the 3D corner‐sharing double‐perovskite structure is preserved throughout, and the transitions arise from the cooperative orientational and positional disordering of FA+, NO3 −, and RM3HQ+ (Figure 2a–c). In the RTP (Figure 2a), FA+ is distributed over two orientations related by the crystallographic 2‐fold axis, four of the six NO3 − groups exhibit split‐site positional disorder, and RM3HQ+ remains fully ordered. Despite this local disorder, the polar space group C2 is maintained. Upon heating to the ITP (Figure 2b), FA+ accesses six orientations generated by the 3‐fold and 2‐fold axes, the NO3 − split‐site occupancies converge toward 0.5/0.5, and RM3HQ+ develops 3‐fold disorder around the 3‐fold axis. This concerted disordering elevates the average symmetry to R32 and eliminates the polar order. In the HTP (Figure 2c), FA+ occupies 24 symmetry‐related orientations generated by the 4‐fold, 3‐fold, and 2‐fold axes; NO3 − adopts a highly averaged distribution, and RM3HQ+ exhibits 12‐fold disorder. Across the full sequence, FA+ orientational disordering appears to dominate the local disorder, with NO3 − and RM3HQ+ responding cooperatively. This correlation suggests that B I‐site motion is linked to nitrate rearrangement and contributes to the long‐range symmetry evolution.
Compound 4 follows the same pathway but starts from a more ordered configuration. In its RTP, DMA+ is fully ordered within the cavity, only two of the six NO3 − groups show split‐site positional disorder, and RM3HQ+ remains ordered as in the RTP of 3 (Figure S5). The ITP and HTP show disorder distributions analogous to those of 3. Nevertheless, 4 undergoes the order–disorder transition at a substantially lower temperature than 3. This difference can be attributed to the different local B I(NO3)6 environments. FA+ is a rigid, planar cation that anchors to the surrounding nitrate groups through four directional N–H···O contacts and thus requires a relatively high temperature to activate its orientational disorder. DMA+, by contrast, is more flexible and nonplanar, with only two N–H donors flanked by methyl groups; its weaker and less directional B I···NO3 interactions allow orientational disorder to set in at a lower temperature. Thus, the higher transition temperature of 3 relative to 4 reflects the stronger and more directional local B I···NO3 interactions in the FA+‐centered B I(NO3)6 unit.
2.3. Phase Transitions and Macroscopic Ferroic Responses
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) reveals that the two corner‐sharing double‐perovskite compounds, 3 and 4, both show two reversible thermal anomalies with pronounced hysteresis (Figure 3a,b). For the FA+ compound 3, two endothermic peaks appear at 414 and 420 K upon heating, with the corresponding exothermic peaks at 412 and 402 K upon cooling. The DMA+ analogue 4 displays a similar two‐step thermal profile but at substantially lower temperatures, with endotherms at 349 and 353 K and exotherms at 345 and 331 K.
FIGURE 3.

Phase transitions and macroscopic ferroic responses of (RM3HQ)2 B IEu(NO3)6. DSC curves of compounds 3 (a) and 4 (b) upon heating (red) and cooling (blue). (c) Comparison of the ferroelectric Curie temperatures (T c) of 3 and 4 with three isostructural analogues: RbLa = (RM3HQ)2RbLa(NO3)6 [25], RbEu = (RM3HQ)2RbEu(NO3)6 [28], and NH4La = (RM3HQ)2(NH4)La(NO3)6 [25]. (d) Powder SHG signals of compounds 1–4 at room temperature, with KDP as a reference; traces are horizontally offset for clarity. (e) Variable‐temperature SHG intensity of 3 upon heating (red) and cooling (blue). (f) Temperature‐dependent dielectric response (ε′) of 3 at frequencies from 5 kHz to 2 MHz. (g) Polarization–electric field (P–E) hysteresis loop of 3 at 293 K and 50 Hz. (h) Quasi‐static d 33 values of 3 measured on three independent samples. (i) Comparison of d 33 values of 3 with representative piezoelectric materials [3, 28, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59].
Within the corner‐sharing Eu series, replacing the inorganic Rb+ at the B I‐site with the molecular cations DMA+ and FA+ raises the first polar‐to‐nonpolar transition temperature from 285 K in the previously reported (RM3HQ)2RbEu(NO3)6 analogue to 349 K in 4 and 414 K in 3, corresponding to increases of 64 and 129 K, respectively [28]. This comparison demonstrates that molecular substitution at a single crystallographic B I‐site can substantially elevate the polar‐to‐nonpolar transition temperature (Figure 3c). Two La‐based analogues, (RM3HQ)2RbLa(NO3)6 and (RM3HQ)2(NH4)La(NO3)6, are included as benchmarks [25]. A broader comparison with 2D and 3D nitrate‐based rare‐earth double perovskites is summarized in Table S5, where 3 lies at the upper end of the reported transition‐temperature range. Thermogravimetric analysis further confirms that 3 and 4 remain thermally stable well above their respective transition regions (Figure S6).
All four compounds exhibit detectable second‐harmonic generation (SHG) responses at 293 K, with intensities of ca. 0.10–0.14 times that of KDP, consistent with their non‐centrosymmetric ground states (Figure 3d). Variable‐temperature SHG measurements on 3 directly track the symmetry evolution across the two‐step transition (Figure 3e): upon heating, the SHG signal decreases sharply at the C2 → R32 transition, marking the loss of macroscopic polar order, and weakens further upon entering the high‐symmetry F432 phase; upon cooling, the signal recovers, demonstrating reversible symmetry switching within a single thermal cycle.
The real part of the complex permittivity, ε′, of 3 reproduces the two thermal anomalies as two distinct dielectric features (Figure 3f). The lower‐temperature anomaly is broad and strongly frequency‐dependent: between 5 kHz and 2 MHz, the ε′ maximum shifts to higher temperature, suggestive of relaxor‐like dielectric behavior reminiscent of PbMg1/3Nb2/3O3 (PMN) and related (RM3HQ)2RbLn(NO3)6 systems (Ln = La, Ce, Pr, Eu) [25, 26, 27, 28, 60]. In contrast, the higher‐temperature anomaly is sharper and nearly frequency‐independent, consistent with the second thermal anomaly and the further suppression of the SHG signal at the R32 → F432 step.
The ferroelectricity of 3 was verified by polarization–electric field (P–E) measurements at 293 K and 50 Hz, which yielded a closed hysteresis loop with P s ≈ 1.4 µC cm−2 and E c ≈ 17 kV cm−1 (Figure 3g). The C2 → R32 transition corresponds to the Aizu species 32F2 [61], permitting three symmetry‐equivalent polarization directions in the polar phase. The P s value is substantially larger than that of the isostructural RbLa analogue, (RM3HQ)2RbLa(NO3)6 (∼0.18 µC cm−2) [25], although it remains relatively small compared with those of many recently reported molecular ferroelectrics [62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70].
Quasi‐static d 33 measurements on independent single crystals of 3, under the measurement conditions described in Figure S9, yielded an average |d 33| of ca. 56 pC N−1 (Figure 3h). Benchmarking against representative molecular ferroelectrics and piezoelectrics (Figure 3i, with an extended comparison in Table S6) shows that 3 exhibits appreciable macroscopic piezoelectricity. Although its d 33 is lower than that of TMCM‐MnCl3 (185 pC N−1) [3], it exceeds those of several widely studied molecular and polymeric piezoelectrics, including [(CF3‐C6H4‐NH3)(18‐crown‐6)][TFSA] (42 pC N−1) [52], PVDF (28 pC N−1) [56], and TGS (20 pC N−1) [59]. Notably, relative to the RbEu analogue (RM3HQ)2RbEu(NO3)6 (103 pC N−1) [28], compound 3 retains appreciable piezoelectricity (56 pC N−1) while raising the polar‐to‐nonpolar transition temperature to 414 K, far above room temperature.
2.4. Ferroelectric and Ferroelastic Domain Behavior of 3
Piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) measurements were performed on a thin‐film sample of 3 to investigate its nanoscale ferroelectric domain structure (Figure 4a–f). The topography image shows a smooth surface (Figure 4a). Vertical PFM amplitude and phase images reveal stripe‐like ferroelectric domains, with opposite phase contrasts between adjacent stripes indicating oppositely oriented out‐of‐plane polarization components (Figure 4b,c). Local switching spectroscopy at a selected point produced a butterfly‐shaped amplitude–voltage loop and a phase–voltage hysteresis loop (Figure 4d), demonstrating reversible polarization switching at the nanoscale. Lateral PFM amplitude and phase images resolved in‐plane domain contrast (Figure 4e,f); the coexistence of vertical and lateral piezoresponses is consistent with the multiaxial nature expected for the Aizu species 32F2 [61].
FIGURE 4.

Ferroelectric and ferroelastic domain behavior of compound 3. (a) PFM topography image of a thin film of 3. (b) Vertical PFM amplitude image. (c) Vertical PFM phase image. (d) Amplitude–voltage butterfly loop and phase–voltage hysteresis loop. (e) Lateral PFM amplitude image. (f) Lateral PFM phase image. (g) Variable‐temperature polarized‐light microscopy images of ferroelastic domain evolution in 3, collected during heating from 353 to 433 K and during subsequent cooling from 433 to 383 K.
Variable‐temperature polarized‐light microscopy was used to track the ferroelastic domain evolution across the phase‐transition region (Figure 4g). The C2 → R32 transition corresponds to the Aizu species 32F2, and the R32 → F432 transition corresponds to 432F32 [61]. Upon heating, stripe‐like ferroelastic textures became clearly visible at 393 K, faded by 418 K, and vanished at 433 K as the crystal enters the high‐symmetry phase. Upon cooling, the textures reappeared at 408 K and further developed at 383 K. The reversible appearance and disappearance of these textures are consistent with the ferroelastic domain evolution associated with the transitions. The complete evolution is shown in Movie S1.
2.5. Temperature‐Dependent Eu3 + Luminescence across Phase Transitions
The order–disorder transitions discussed above also perturb the local coordination environment around Eu3+ centers. Because nitrate groups both coordinate Eu3+ and connect neighboring Eu(NO3)6 units, changes in nitrate disorder and B I‐site dynamics can modify the Eu‐centered ligand field. Therefore, Eu3+ luminescence provides an optical probe of local ligand‐field changes around Eu(NO3)6 [46, 71, 72]. At 293 K, the absorption, excitation, and emission spectra of compounds 1–4 are shown in Figure 5a. Their absorption spectra are similar, with comparable estimated optical bandgaps (Figure S10). Upon excitation at 397 nm, corresponding to the 7F0 → 5L6 transition, all four compounds exhibit typical Eu3+ red emission, including the 5D0 → 7F1 magnetic‐dipole band near 592 nm, the electric‐dipole 5D0 → 7F2 band near 616 nm, and a weaker 5D0 → 7F4 band near 689 nm [46, 47]. Under 365 nm excitation, the PLQYs of 1–4 are 12.4%, 7.8%, 18.2%, and 7.0%, respectively (Figure S11).
FIGURE 5.

(a) Room‐temperature absorption (Abs.), excitation (Ex.), and emission (Em.) spectra of compounds 1–4. (b,c) Temperature‐dependent Eu3+ emission spectra of 3 (300–450 K) and 4 (250–375 K) across their phase‐transition regions. (d) Temperature‐dependent I616/I592 ratios for 3 (red) and 4 (blue); I616 and I592 are the electric‐dipole (ED, 616 nm) and magnetic‐dipole (MD, 592 nm) emission intensities. (e) Temperature‐dependent average Eu3+ emission lifetimes for 3 (red) and 4 (blue). (f) Schematic Eu3+ optical transitions, highlighting enhanced ED emission in the HTP. (g) Local Eu3+ coordination evolution of 3 and 4 from C2 to F432, with NO3 − groups represented by centroids. Eu···NO3‐centroid distances, centroid‐distance distortion indices Δ d , and angular variances σ 2 are annotated.
Temperature‐dependent emission spectra reveal a clear redistribution of Eu3+ emission channels during the phase transitions. For compound 3, upon heating from 300 to 450 K across the transition region, the 5D0 → 7F1 magnetic‐dipole band remains nearly unchanged in relative intensity, whereas the 5D0 → 7F2 and 5D0 → 7F4 electric‐dipole bands are markedly enhanced (Figure 5b). Compound 4 shows the same trend over 250–375 K (Figure 5c). Accordingly, the 616/592 nm emission intensity ratio I616/I592 increases from 0.32 to 2.92 for 3 and from 0.37 to 4.59 for 4 (Figure 5d), with the larger change in 4 indicating a more pronounced change in the relative intensities of the two emission channels [46, 71]. Consistent with these spectral changes, the average Eu3+ emission lifetimes decrease with increasing temperature and drop noticeably near the corresponding transition regions (Figure 5e), indicating enhanced nonradiative relaxation during the phase transitions [47, 73, 74].
The redistribution of Eu3+ emission channels can be understood from the different sensitivities of these optical transitions to the local ligand field (Figure 5f). The 5D0 → 7F1 magnetic‐dipole transition is relatively insensitive to the ligand environment and can therefore serve as an internal reference. By comparison, the 5D0 → 7F2 transition is a hypersensitive transition that is strongly affected by local asymmetry around Eu3+ [46, 71, 73]. Thus, the increase in I616/I592 is consistent with changes in the relative emission contributions of the two channels during the phase transitions, which may arise from modifications of the local Eu3+ environment.
Local structural analysis helps rationalize the different ligand‐field responses of compounds 3 and 4 (Figure 5g). The Eu(NO3)6 geometries were evaluated using Eu···NO3‐centroid distances, a centroid‐distance distortion index Δ d , and an angular variance σ 2, with NO3 − groups represented by their centroids. In the C2 phase of 3, the Eu···NO3‐centroid distances span ∼2.93–3.04 Å, giving Δ d ≈ 0.014 and σ 2 ≈ 0.45, indicating weak static distortion mainly reflected in distance dispersion. In the C2 phase of 4, the corresponding distances are nearly identical, ∼2.95–2.96 Å, with Δ d ≈ 0.001 but σ 2 ≈ 28.75, indicating a larger angular contribution to the local distortion. Upon transformation to F432, the crystallographic models of both compounds become dynamically averaged, giving regular average Eu(NO3)6 geometries with Δ d ≈ 0 and σ 2 ≈ 0. This crystallographic regularity, however, arises from extensive nitrate disorder rather than from a truly static, ordered Eu(NO3)6 environment. The greater spatial dispersion of nitrate O atoms around Eu in 4 than in 3 (Figure S14) suggests differences in their local coordination environments, which may contribute to the different temperature‐dependent I616/I592 responses. During the structural transitions, changes in the local coordination environment around Eu3+ may alter the relative intensities of the 616 and 592 nm emission channels, thereby providing an optical response to the phase transitions.
The increase in I616/I592 is notable because the average crystallographic symmetry increases from C2 to F432. Under this higher average symmetry, the 5D0 → 7F2 electric‐dipole transition, which is hypersensitive to local asymmetry around Eu3+, would normally be expected to weaken rather than strengthen [46, 73]. This apparent discrepancy suggests that Eu3+ emission reflects local ligand‐field asymmetry beyond the average crystallographic structure. The enhanced electric‐dipole emission is therefore consistent with locally low‐symmetry Eu(NO3)6 environments associated with dynamically disordered B I‐site cations, NO3 − groups, and RM3HQ+ cations, which are averaged in diffraction but remain detectable by Eu3+ luminescence [46, 71, 73].
This behavior distinguishes the present compounds from conventional Eu3+‐based luminescent thermometers and Eu3+‐doped ferroic or phase‐transition materials, in which Eu3+ is introduced as an external optical probe [74, 75, 76, 77, 78]. Here, Eu3+ is an integral part of the nitrate‐based double‐perovskite structure. Therefore, the temperature‐dependent change in I616/I592 does not merely serve as a thermometric signal but reflects transition‐related changes in the local ligand field around Eu3+, providing a dopant‐free optical signature of the phase transitions.
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, molecular double perovskites offer crystallographically distinct sites for connecting local molecular interactions with extended connectivity, structural phase transitions, and coupled physical responses. This work demonstrates that, in nitrate‐based rare‐earth double perovskites, the B I‐site can serve as a flexible handle, where B I···NO3 interactions are closely linked to nitrate connectivity and Eu‐centered ligand‐field variations. Replacing smaller NH4 +/MA+ with larger FA+/DMA+ at the B I‐site converts mixed corner‐/face‐sharing non‐perovskite structures into 3D corner‐sharing double perovskites and raises the ferroelectric transition temperature as high as 414 K. In compound 3, this elevated‐temperature transition is accompanied by ferroelectric hysteresis, reversible ferroelastic domains, and macroscopic piezoelectricity, confirming multiaxial ferroic behavior. In addition, the temperature‐dependent change in the PL intensity ratio (I616/I592) reflects transition‐related changes in the local ligand field of Eu3+, providing a luminescence signature of the phase transitions. These results diversify the family of molecular perovskites and demonstrate clear structure–function relations in hybrid ferroic materials.
Author Contributions
Le Ye: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, data curation, visualization, and Writing – original draft. Guang‐Yuan Hu: investigation and validation. Yarou Duan: investigation and validation. Yutong Lin: visualization and validation. Ding‐Chong Han: investigation and validation. Zi‐Luo Fang: investigation and validation. Liang‐Han Shen: investigation and validation. Zhe Dong: supervision and writing – review and editing. Wei‐Xiong Zhang: supervision and writing – review and editing. Na Wang: investigation, funding acquisition, and writing – review and editing. Le‐Ping Miao: investigation, funding acquisition, supervision, and writing – review and editing. Heng‐Yun Ye: conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision, and writing – review and editing. Lingling Mao: conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision, project administration, resources, writing – original draft, and writing – review and editing. All authors discussed the results and approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Supporting File 1: advs78404‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.
Supporting File 2: advs78404‐sup‐0002‐MovieS1.mp4.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants awarded to L.M., including the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC; Nos. 22575111, 22275077) and the High‐Level Special Fund of SUSTech (G03034K001). The authors are grateful for the assistance provided by the SUSTech Core Research Facilities. The contributions of N.W., L.‐P.M., and H.‐Y.Y. were supported by their respective grants: N.W. by the NSFC (No. 22505093) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (No. 20252BAC200200); L.‐P.M. by the NSFC (No. 22371095) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (No. 20232BAB213003, 20242BAB23015); and H.‐Y.Y. by the NSFC (Nos. 22275075 and U25A20567).
Contributor Information
Le‐Ping Miao, Email: miaoleping@jxust.edu.cn.
Heng‐Yun Ye, Email: hyye@seu.edu.cn.
Lingling Mao, Email: maoll@sustech.edu.cn.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supporting Information of this article. The Supporting Information contains experimental procedures, crystallographic data and refinements, supplementary structural and physical characterization, photophysical analyses, equations, figures, tables, and Movie S1 showing the temperature‐dependent ferroelastic domain evolution of compound 3. Deposition Numbers 2529489 (for 1 at 293 K), 2529490 (for 2 at 100 K), 2529492 (for 3 at 293 K), 2529493 (for 3 at 420 K), 2529494 (for 3 at 433 K), 2529491 (for 4 at 300 K), 2553218 (for 4 at 353 K), and 2553219 (for 4 at 373 K) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe Access Structures service (https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures/).
References
- 1. Pan Q., Gu Z.‐X., Zhou R.‐J., et al., “The Past 10 Years of Molecular Ferroelectrics: Structures, Design, and Properties,” Chemical Society Reviews 53 (2024): 5781–5861, 10.1039/D3CS00262D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Zhang T., Xu K., Li J., et al., “Ferroelectric hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites and their structural and functional diversity,” National Science Review 10, no. 2 (2023): nwac240, 10.1093/nsr/nwac240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. You Y.‐M., Liao W.‐Q., Zhao D., et al., “An organic‐inorganic perovskite ferroelectric with large piezoelectric response,” Science 357, no. 6348 (2017): 306–309, 10.1126/science.aai8535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Xu W.‐J., Li P.‐F., Tang Y.‐Y., Zhang W.‐X., Xiong R.‐G., and Chen X.‐M., “A Molecular Perovskite with Switchable Coordination Bonds for High‐Temperature Multiaxial Ferroelectrics,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 139, no. 18 (2017): 6369–6375, 10.1021/jacs.7b01334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Liao W.‐Q., Zhao D., Tang Y.‐Y., et al., “A Molecular Perovskite Solid Solution with Piezoelectricity Stronger Than Lead Zirconate Titanate,” Science 363, no. 6432 (2019): 1206–1210, 10.1126/science.aav3057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Xu W.‐J., Li M.‐F., Garcia A. R., et al., “Molecular Design of a Metal‐Nitrosyl Ferroelectric with Reversible Photoisomerization,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, no. 25 (2023): 13663–13673, 10.1021/jacs.3c01530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Zhang H.‐Y., Tang Y.‐Y., Gu Z.‐X., et al., “Biodegradable Ferroelectric Molecular Crystal with Large Piezoelectric Response,” Science 383, no. 6690 (2024): 1492–1498, 10.1126/science.adj1946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Lun M.‐M., Sun M.‐M., Wang Y.‐Q., et al., “Recent Progress in Single‐Phase Molecular Multiferroic Materials with Ferroelectricity and Ferroelasticity,” Chemical Science 17, no. 21 (2026): 10355–10373, 10.1039/D5SC10231F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Guo Z., Lin J., and Mao L., “Dynamic Control of Halide Perovskite Structures for Tailored Ferroelectric and Second‐Order Nonlinear Optical Functionalities,” Chemical Society Reviews 54, no. 19 (2025): 8845–8887, 10.1039/D5CS00475F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Saparov B. and Mitzi D. B., “Organic–Inorganic Perovskites: Structural Versatility for Functional Materials Design,” Chemical Reviews 116, no. 7 (2016): 4558–4596, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Li W., Wang Z., Deschler F., Gao S., Friend R. H., and Cheetham A. K., “Chemically Diverse and Multifunctional Hybrid Organic–Inorganic Perovskites,” Nature Reviews Materials 2, no. 3 (2017): 16099, 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.99. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Lee J. W., Tan S., Seok S. I., Yang Y., and Park N. G., “Rethinking the A Cation in Halide Perovskites,” Science 375, no. 6583 (2022): abj1186, 10.1126/science.abj1186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Xu G.‐C., Ma X.‐M., Zhang L., Wang Z.‐M., and Gao S., “Disorder–Order Ferroelectric Transition in the Metal Formate Framework of [NH4][Zn(HCOO)3],” Journal of the American Chemical Society 132, no. 28 (2010): 9588–9590, 10.1021/ja104263m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Chen X.‐G., Qin Y., Lv H.‐P., Song X.‐J., Liao W.‐Q., and Xiong R.‐G., “Metal–Organic Framework Goes Perovskite: A Self‐Healing Neutral X‐Site Perovskite Ferroelastic Crystal,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 148, no. 22 (2026): 23383–23391, 10.1021/jacs.6c08330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Chen X.‐G., Qin Y., Weng Y.‐R., et al., “Neutral X‐Site ABX3‐Type Perovskites,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 65 (2026): 3168284, 10.1002/anie.3168284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ye H.‐Y., Tang Y.‐Y., Li P.‐F., et al., “Metal‐Free Three‐Dimensional Perovskite Ferroelectrics,” Science 361, no. 6398 (2018): 151–155, 10.1126/science.aas9330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Handa T., Hashimoto R., Yumoto G., Nakamura T., Wakamiya A., and Kanemitsu Y., “Metal‐Free Ferroelectric Halide Perovskite Exhibits Visible Photoluminescence Correlated With Local Ferroelectricity,” Science Advances 8, no. 25 (2022): abo1621, 10.1126/sciadv.abo1621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Chen S.‐L., Yang Z.‐R., Wang B.‐J., et al., “Molecular Perovskite High‐Energetic Materials,” Science China Materials 61, no. 8 (2018): 1123–1128, 10.1007/s40843-017-9219-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Shang Y., Yu Z.‐H., Huang R.‐K., et al., “Metal‐Free Hexagonal Perovskite High‐Energetic Materials with NH3OH+/NH2NH3 + as B‐Site Cations,” Engineering 6, no. 9 (2020): 1013–1018, 10.1016/j.eng.2020.05.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Wang B., Ma D., Zhao H., Long L., and Zheng L., “Room Temperature Lead‐Free Multiaxial Inorganic–Organic Hybrid Ferroelectric,” Inorganic Chemistry 58, no. 20 (2019): 13953–13959, 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b01793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Fu D., Wang Q., Wu S., et al., “Regulating Noncovalent Interactions to Construct High‐Temperature Multiaxial Lead‐Free Metal Halide Hybrid Ferroelectrics,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 148, no. 12 (2026): 12932–12945, 10.1021/jacs.5c21648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Liu Y., Wei L., Gong C., et al., “Coexistence of Ferroelectricity and Antiferroelectricity in a Photoactive Low‐Dimensional Coordination Single‐Phase Crystal,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 148, no. 13 (2026): 14151–14159, 10.1021/jacs.6c00155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Liu Y., Luo Z., Wei Y., et al., “Integrating Achiral and Chiral Organic Ligands in Zero‐Dimensional Hybrid Metal Halides to Boost Circularly Polarized Luminescence,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62 (2023): 202306821, 10.1002/anie.202306821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Shi C., Ye L., Gong Z.‐X., et al., “Two‐Dimensional Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Rare‐Earth Double Perovskite Ferroelectrics,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 142, no. 1 (2020): 545–551, 10.1021/jacs.9b11697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Shi C., Ma J.‐J., Jiang J.‐Y., et al., “Two‐Dimensional Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Rare‐Earth Double Perovskite Ferroelectrics,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 142, no. 1 (2020): 545–551, 10.1021/jacs.0c00480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hu Z.‐B., Wang C.‐F., Sha T.‐T., et al., “An Effective Strategy of Introducing Chirality to Achieve Multifunctionality in Rare‐Earth Double Perovskite Ferroelectrics,” Small Methods 6, no. 9 (2022): 2200421, 10.1002/smtd.202200421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Jia Q.‐Q., Lu H.‐F., Luo J.‐Q., et al., “Organic–Inorganic Rare‐Earth Double Perovskite Ferroelectric with Large Piezoelectric Response and Ferroelasticity for Flexible Composite Energy Harvesters,” Small 20, no. 16 (2024): 2306989, 10.1002/smll.202306989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Wang C.‐F., Shi C., Zheng A., et al., “Achieving Circularly Polarized Luminescence and Large Piezoelectric Response in Hybrid Rare‐Earth Double Perovskite by a Chirality Induction Strategy,” Materials Horizons 9, no. 9 (2022): 2450–2459, 10.1039/D2MH00698G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Wang N., Xu Z.‐J., Ni H.‐F., et al., “Molecular Engineering Regulation Achieving out‐of‐Plane Polarization in Rare‐Earth Hybrid Double Perovskites for Ferroelectrics and Circularly Polarized Luminescence,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 63 (2024): 202409796, 10.1002/anie.202409796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Wang C.‐F., Yang Y., Hu Y., et al., “Inside Back Cover: Exploring Aqueous Solution‐Processed Pseudohalide Rare‐Earth Double Perovskite Ferroelectrics Toward X‐Ray Detection with High Sensitivity (Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49/2024),” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 63, no. 49 (2024): 202413726, 10.1002/anie.202413726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Lei Y., Peng G., Xu Y., Li Z., and Jin Z., “Molecular Engineering Tunes Lattice Dynamics in Hybrid Lanthanide Pseudohalides for Superior X‐Ray Detection,” Materials Today 95 (2026): 103287, 10.1016/j.mattod.2026.103287. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Lei Y., Peng G., Xu Y., et al., “Synergistic Rare‐Earth Alloying and Pseudohalide Coordination Constructing Hybrid Metal Pseudohalide With Robust Crystal Fields for Stable X‐Ray Detection with Record Sensitivity,” Advanced Functional Materials 36, no. 5 (2026): 15738, 10.1002/adfm.202515738. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Sun X., Li Y., Qiu X., et al., “Two 3D Rare‐Earth Double Perovskite Materials Constructed with a Pair of Enantiomers,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 17, no. 7 (2025): 10845–10852, 10.1021/acsami.4c21385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Sun X., Li Y., Yin X., Wei Z., and Cai H., “High‐Performance Circularly Polarized Luminescence and Multifunctionality in Rare‐Earth Hybrid Double Perovskites via Molecular Engineering,” Small 21 (2025): 2505445, 10.1002/smll.202505445. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Xiao H., Sheng L.‐Y., Chen S., et al., “Temperature‐Tunable Multiple Dielectric Switch in Hybrid Rare‐Earth Perovskites Regulated by Hierarchical Guest Dynamics, Lanthanide Contraction and Doping,” Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers 11, no. 16 (2024): 5336–5344, 10.1039/D4QI01243G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Li H.‐K., Wang L.‐P., Wang N., et al., “Hybrid Rare‐Earth Double Perovskite Ferroic with Near‐Infrared Light‐Emitting Property,” Chemistry of Materials 36 (2024): 8846–8853, 10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01613. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Zou Q.‐H., Wang Z.‐J., Wu L.‐K., et al., “Three‐Dimensional Bimetallic Ammonium K–Eu Nitrate with a Rare (6,6)‐Connected Ion Topology Exhibiting Structural Phase Transition and Photoluminescence Properties,” Inorganic Chemistry 63, no. 23 (2024): 10817–10822, 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c01520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Xu Q., Ye L., Liao R.‐M., et al., “H/F Substitution Induced Large Increase of Tc in a 3D Hybrid Rare‐Earth Double Perovskite Multifunctional Compound,” Chemistry—A European Journal 28 (2022): 202200521, 10.1002/chem.202200521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Hua M.‐M., Ye L., Wang Q.‐W., et al., “A Layered Hybrid Rare‐Earth Double‐Perovskite‐Type Molecule‐Based Compound with Electrical and Optical Response Properties,” Journal of Materials Chemistry C 8, no. 46 (2020): 16349–16353, 10.1039/D0TC04386A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Wang L., Fan C., Hu Z., Zhao H., Li J., and Shi C., “High‐Temperature Biferroicity in a Chiral 3D Hybrid Rare‐Earth‐Based Double Perovskite,” Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers 13, no. 10 (2026): 4513–4520, 10.1039/D6QI00400H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Hu Z.‐H., Zhao H.‐F., Cui Z.‐Z., et al., “Coexisting Dielectric and X‐Ray Response in a Nitrate‐Bridged Perovskite‐Type Bimetal Rare‐Earth Hybrid Semiconductor,” Inorganic Chemistry 65, no. 3 (2026): 1975–1980, 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c05001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Tarlton M. L., Skanthakumar S., Hutchison D., Gremillion A. J., Oliver A. G., and Wilson R. E., “Synthesis of an Isostructural Series of 12‐Coordinate Lanthanide Nitrate Hybrid Double Perovskites With Cubic Symmetry,” Inorganic Chemistry 61, no. 43 (2022): 17101–17108, 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c02546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Tarlton M. L., Persinger T. D., Byrne N. M., Douglas T. C., Yakovenko A., and Wilson R. E., “Rare Earth Nitrate Hybrid Double Perovskites [Me4N]2[MLn(NO3)6] (M = Na–Cs; Ln = La–Gd, ex. Pm),” Inorganic Chemistry 62, no. 41 (2023): 16770–16781, 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c02081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Lin M.‐J., Li J.‐Y., Liu P.‐G., et al., “An abnormal decrease in Curie temperature in pseudohalide rare‐earth double perovskite ferroelastics driven by lanthanide contraction,” Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers 13, no. 12 (2026): 5184–5191, 10.1039/D6QI00521G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Cheng Y., Yao H.‐Q., Zhang Y.‐D., Shi C., Ye H.‐Y., and Wang N., “Nitrate‐bridged hybrid organic‐inorganic perovskites,” Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry 43, no. 9 (2024): 100358, 10.1016/j.cjsc.2024.100358. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Binnemans K., “Interpretation of Europium(III) Spectra,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews 295 (2015): 1–45, 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.02.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Eliseeva S. V. and Bünzli J.‐C. G., “Lanthanide Luminescence for Functional Materials and Bio‐Sciences,” Chemical Society Review 39, no. 1 (2010): 189–227, 10.1039/B905604C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Bünzli J.‐C. G., “Lanthanide Luminescence for Biomedical Analyses and Imaging,” Chemical Reviews 110, no. 5 (2010): 2729–2755, 10.1021/cr900362e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Liu H.‐Y., Zhang H.‐Y., Chen X.‐G., and Xiong R.‐G., “Molecular Design Principles for Ferroelectrics: Ferroelectrochemistry,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 142, no. 36 (2020): 15205–15218, 10.1021/jacs.0c07055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Peng H., Qi J.‐C., Liu Y.‐S., Zhang J.‐M., Liao W.‐Q., and Xiong R.‐G., “Homochirality in Ferroelectrochemistry,” Chinese Journal of Chemistry 42, no. 10 (2024): 1133–1144, 10.1002/cjoc.202300640. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Zhang H., Xu Z.‐K., Wang Z.‐X., et al., “Large Piezoelectric Response in a Metal‐Free Three‐Dimensional Perovskite Ferroelectric,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, no. 8 (2023): 4892–4899, 10.1021/jacs.3c00646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Lv H.‐P., Li Y.‐R., Song X.‐J., Zhang N., Xiong R.‐G., and Zhang H.‐Y., “A Poling‐Free Supramolecular Crown Ether Compound With Large Piezoelectricity,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, no. 5 (2023): 3187–3195, 10.1021/jacs.2c12951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. He Y.‐Y., Wu S.‐F., Li X.‐F., et al., “Constructing a Photoferroelectric Semiconductor by Regulating Non‐Covalent Interactions Through Halogen Substitution,” Chemical Science 16, no. 44 (2025): 20948–20958, 10.1039/D5SC05946A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Pan L., Ni H.‐F., Huang P.‐Z., et al., “Multiferroic Orders and Piezoelectric Sensing in an Organic‐Inorganic Bismuth Halide,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 65, no. 16 (2026): 5334832, 10.1002/anie.5334832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Tao K.‐Z., Zhang B.‐W., Li Q., and Yan Q.‐F., “Centimeter‐Sized Piezoelectric Single Crystal of Chiral Bismuth‐Based Hybrid Halide with Superior Electrostrictive Coefficient,” Small 19, no. 15 (2023): 2207663, 10.1002/smll.202207663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Mohammadpourfazeli S., Arash S., Ansari A., Yang S.‐Y., Mallick K., and Bagherzadeh R., “Future Prospects and Recent Developments of Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF) Piezoelectric Polymer; Fabrication Methods, Structure, and Electro‐Mechanical Properties,” RSC Advances 13, no. 1 (2023): 370–387, 10.1039/D2RA06774A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Yang H.‐R., Wei X.‐Q., Wang G.‐Z., et al., “Enabling Energy Harvesting and Underwater Ultrasound Detection with Chiral 0D Hybrid Tin Bromides †,” Chinese Journal of Chemistry 43, no. 23 (2025): 3213–3220, 10.1002/cjoc.70242. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Liao W.‐Q., Tang Y.‐Y., Li P.‐F., You Y.‐M., and Xiong R.‐G., “Competitive Halogen Bond in the Molecular Ferroelectric with Large Piezoelectric Response,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 140, no. 11 (2018): 3975–3980, 10.1021/jacs.7b12524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Lv H.‐P., Liao W.‐Q., You Y.‐M., and Xiong R.‐G., “Inch‐Size Molecular Ferroelectric Crystal with a Large Electromechanical Coupling Factor on Par With Barium Titanate,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 144, no. 48 (2022): 22325–22331, 10.1021/jacs.2c11213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Cross L. E., “Relaxor Ferroelectrics,” Ferroelectrics 76, no. 1 (1987): 241–267, 10.1080/00150198708016945. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Aizu K., “Possible Species of “Ferroelastic” Crystals and of Simultaneously Ferroelectric and Ferroelastic Crystals,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 27, no. 2 (1969): 387–396, 10.1143/JPSJ.27.387. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Guo Z., Han D., Song X.‐J., et al., “High‐Performance Second‐Harmonic Generation in Hybrid Ge Perovskite Ferroelectrics Enabled by Confinement Engineering,” Aggregate 7, no. 1 (2026): 70242, 10.1002/agt2.70242. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Huang P.‐Z., Liu Z., Ye L.‐K., et al., “Mechanically Deformable Organic Ferroelectric Crystal with Plasticity Optimized by Fluorination,” Nature Communications 16, no. 1 (2025): 3071, 10.1038/s41467-025-58416-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Ma Y., Wang B., Li W., et al., “Unusual Triple‐State Switching of Thermally Induced Birefringence in a Two‐Dimensional Perovskite Ferroelectric,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 146, no. 40 (2024): 27287–27292, 10.1021/jacs.4c10415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Liu Y., Fu L., Tang L., et al., “Visible‐Photo‐Assisted Phase Switching of Antiferroelectric‐to‐Ferroelectric Orders in an I3 −‐Intercalated 2D Perovskite,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 63 (2024): 202413898, 10.1002/anie.202413898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Han S., Bie J., Fa W., et al., “Field‐Induced Antiferroelectric–Ferroelectric Transformation in Organometallic Perovskite Displaying Giant Negative Electrocaloric Effect,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 146, no. 12 (2024): 8298–8307, 10.1021/jacs.3c13422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Harada J., Takahashi H., Notsuka R., et al., “Ferroelectric Ionic Molecular Crystals with Significant Plasticity and a Low Melting Point: High Performance in Hot‐Pressed Polycrystalline Plates and Melt‐Grown Crystalline Sheets,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62, no. 3 (2023): 202215286, 10.1002/anie.202215286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Xiong Y.‐A., Duan S.‐S., Hu H.‐H., et al., “Enhancement of Phase Transition Temperature Through Hydrogen Bond Modification in Molecular Ferroelectrics,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 4470, 10.1038/s41467-024-48948-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Wang M., Yuan S., Jiang D., et al., “Two‐dimensional mixed tetrahedral–octahedral hybrid perovskites with coexisting ferroelectricity and intralayer antiferromagnetism,” Nature Synthesis 5, no. 3 (2026): 445–454, 10.1038/s44160-025-00942-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Li E., He W., Wang R., et al., “Polarity‐Dependent Ferroelectric Modulations in Two‐Dimensional Hybrid Perovskite Heterojunction Transistors,” Nature Communications 16, no. 1 (2025): 9382, 10.1038/s41467-025-64387-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Chen L., Cheng P., Zhang Z., et al., “Reduced Local Symmetry in Lithium Compound Li2SrSiO4 Distinguished by an Eu3+ Spectroscopy Probe,” Advanced Science 6, no. 16 (2019): 1802126, 10.1002/advs.201802126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Tran T. N. L., Chiasera A., Lukowiak A., and Ferrari M., “Eu3+ as a Powerful Structural and Spectroscopic Tool for Glass Photonics,” Materials 15, no. 5 (2022): 1847, 10.3390/ma15051847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Shavaleev N. M., Eliseeva S. V., Scopelliti R., and Bünzli J.‐C. G., “Influence of Symmetry on the Luminescence and Radiative Lifetime of Nine‐Coordinate Europium Complexes,” Inorganic Chemistry 54, no. 18 (2015): 9166–9173, 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Ma X., Zhou X., Wu J., et al., “Luminescence Thermometry via Multiparameter Sensing in Y(V,P)O4:Eu3+,Er3+ ,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 147 (2025): 12925–12936, 10.1021/jacs.5c02306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Brites C. D. S., Lima P. P., Silva N., et al., “A Luminescent Molecular Thermometer for Long‐Term Absolute Temperature Measurements at the Nanoscale,” Advanced Materials 22, no. 40 (2010): 4499–4504, 10.1002/adma.201001780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Chen G., Li Q., Liu R., et al., “Structural Phase Transition and Photoluminescence Properties of YF3 and YF3:Eu3+ Under High Pressure,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 15 (2013): 19925–19931, 10.1039/C3CP53230E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Wang J. and Luo L., “The NbO6 octahedral distortion and phase structural transition of Eu3+ ‐doped K0.5Na0.5NbO3–xLiNbO3 ferroelectric ceramics,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society 101, no. 1 (2018): 400–407, 10.1111/jace.15180. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Canu G., Bottaro G., Buscaglia M. T., et al., “Ferroelectric order driven Eu3+ photoluminescence in BaZrxTi1−xO3 perovskite,” Scientific Reports 9, no. 1 (2019): 6441, 10.1038/s41598-019-42897-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting File 1: advs78404‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.
Supporting File 2: advs78404‐sup‐0002‐MovieS1.mp4.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supporting Information of this article. The Supporting Information contains experimental procedures, crystallographic data and refinements, supplementary structural and physical characterization, photophysical analyses, equations, figures, tables, and Movie S1 showing the temperature‐dependent ferroelastic domain evolution of compound 3. Deposition Numbers 2529489 (for 1 at 293 K), 2529490 (for 2 at 100 K), 2529492 (for 3 at 293 K), 2529493 (for 3 at 420 K), 2529494 (for 3 at 433 K), 2529491 (for 4 at 300 K), 2553218 (for 4 at 353 K), and 2553219 (for 4 at 373 K) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe Access Structures service (https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures/).
