Skip to main content
NCBI home page
RNA logoLink to RNA
. 2001 Jan;7(1):94–105. doi: 10.1017/s1355838201000218

The intramolecular stem-loop structure of U6 snRNA can functionally replace the U6atac snRNA stem-loop.

G C Shukla 1, R A Padgett 1
PMCID: PMC1370073  PMID: 11214185

Abstract

The U6 spliceosomal snRNA forms an intramolecular stem-loop structure during spliceosome assembly that is required for splicing and is proposed to be at or near the catalytic center of the spliceosome. U6atac snRNA, the analog of U6 snRNA used in the U12-dependent splicing of the minor class of spliceosomal introns, contains a similar stem-loop whose structure but not sequence is conserved between humans and plants. To determine if the U6 and U6atac stem-loops are functionally analogous, the stem-loops from human and budding yeast U6 snRNAs were substituted for the U6atac snRNA structure and tested in an in vivo genetic suppression assay. Both chimeric U6/U6atac snRNA constructs were active for splicing in vivo. In contrast, several mutations of the native U6atac stem-loop that either delete putatively unpaired residues or disrupt the putative stem regions were inactive for splicing. Compensatory mutations that are expected to restore base pairing within the stem regions restored splicing activity. However, other mutants that retained base pairing potential were inactive, suggesting that functional groups within the stem regions may contribute to function. These results show that the U6atac snRNA stem-loop structure is required for in vivo splicing within the U12-dependent spliceosome and that its role is likely to be similar to that of the U6 snRNA intramolecular stem-loop.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bond U. M., Yario T. A., Steitz J. A. Multiple processing-defective mutations in a mammalian histone pre-mRNA are suppressed by compensatory changes in U7 RNA both in vivo and in vitro. Genes Dev. 1991 Sep;5(9):1709–1722. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.9.1709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boudvillain M., de Lencastre A., Pyle A. M. A tertiary interaction that links active-site domains to the 5' splice site of a group II intron. Nature. 2000 Jul 20;406(6793):315–318. doi: 10.1038/35018589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brow D. A., Guthrie C. Spliceosomal RNA U6 is remarkably conserved from yeast to mammals. Nature. 1988 Jul 21;334(6179):213–218. doi: 10.1038/334213a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burge C. B., Padgett R. A., Sharp P. A. Evolutionary fates and origins of U12-type introns. Mol Cell. 1998 Dec;2(6):773–785. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80292-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chanfreau G., Jacquier A. Catalytic site components common to both splicing steps of a group II intron. Science. 1994 Nov 25;266(5189):1383–1387. doi: 10.1126/science.7973729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Collins C. A., Guthrie C. The question remains: is the spliceosome a ribozyme? Nat Struct Biol. 2000 Oct;7(10):850–854. doi: 10.1038/79598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Costa M., Christian E. L., Michel F. Differential chemical probing of a group II self-splicing intron identifies bases involved in tertiary interactions and supports an alternative secondary structure model of domain V. RNA. 1998 Sep;4(9):1055–1068. doi: 10.1017/s1355838298980670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eckstein F. Nucleoside phosphorothioates. Annu Rev Biochem. 1985;54:367–402. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.54.070185.002055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fabrizio P., Abelson J. Thiophosphates in yeast U6 snRNA specifically affect pre-mRNA splicing in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Jul 25;20(14):3659–3664. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.14.3659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fortner D. M., Troy R. G., Brow D. A. A stem/loop in U6 RNA defines a conformational switch required for pre-mRNA splicing. Genes Dev. 1994 Jan;8(2):221–233. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.2.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Guthrie C. Messenger RNA splicing in yeast: clues to why the spliceosome is a ribonucleoprotein. Science. 1991 Jul 12;253(5016):157–163. doi: 10.1126/science.1853200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hall S. L., Padgett R. A. Requirement of U12 snRNA for in vivo splicing of a minor class of eukaryotic nuclear pre-mRNA introns. Science. 1996 Mar 22;271(5256):1716–1718. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5256.1716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Incorvaia R., Padgett R. A. Base pairing with U6atac snRNA is required for 5' splice site activation of U12-dependent introns in vivo. RNA. 1998 Jun;4(6):709–718. doi: 10.1017/s1355838298980207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kolossova I., Padgett R. A. U11 snRNA interacts in vivo with the 5' splice site of U12-dependent (AU-AC) pre-mRNA introns. RNA. 1997 Mar;3(3):227–233. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Konforti B. B., Abramovitz D. L., Duarte C. M., Karpeisky A., Beigelman L., Pyle A. M. Ribozyme catalysis from the major groove of group II intron domain 5. Mol Cell. 1998 Feb;1(3):433–441. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80043-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Laggerbauer B., Achsel T., Lührmann R. The human U5-200kD DEXH-box protein unwinds U4/U6 RNA duplices in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Apr 14;95(8):4188–4192. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Madhani H. D., Guthrie C. A novel base-pairing interaction between U2 and U6 snRNAs suggests a mechanism for the catalytic activation of the spliceosome. Cell. 1992 Nov 27;71(5):803–817. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90556-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McPheeters D. S. Interactions of the yeast U6 RNA with the pre-mRNA branch site. RNA. 1996 Nov;2(11):1110–1123. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Raghunathan P. L., Guthrie C. A spliceosomal recycling factor that reanneals U4 and U6 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles. Science. 1998 Feb 6;279(5352):857–860. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5352.857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Raghunathan P. L., Guthrie C. RNA unwinding in U4/U6 snRNPs requires ATP hydrolysis and the DEIH-box splicing factor Brr2. Curr Biol. 1998 Jul 16;8(15):847–855. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(07)00345-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shukla G. C., Padgett R. A. Conservation of functional features of U6atac and U12 snRNAs between vertebrates and higher plants. RNA. 1999 Apr;5(4):525–538. doi: 10.1017/s1355838299982213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sun J. S., Manley J. L. A novel U2-U6 snRNA structure is necessary for mammalian mRNA splicing. Genes Dev. 1995 Apr 1;9(7):843–854. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.7.843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sun J. S., Manley J. L. The human U6 snRNA intramolecular helix: structural constraints and lack of sequence specificity. RNA. 1997 May;3(5):514–526. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tani T., Ohshima Y. mRNA-type introns in U6 small nuclear RNA genes: implications for the catalysis in pre-mRNA splicing. Genes Dev. 1991 Jun;5(6):1022–1031. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.6.1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tarn W. Y., Steitz J. A. A novel spliceosome containing U11, U12, and U5 snRNPs excises a minor class (AT-AC) intron in vitro. Cell. 1996 Mar 8;84(5):801–811. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81057-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tarn W. Y., Steitz J. A. Highly diverged U4 and U6 small nuclear RNAs required for splicing rare AT-AC introns. Science. 1996 Sep 27;273(5283):1824–1832. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5283.1824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tarn W. Y., Steitz J. A. Pre-mRNA splicing: the discovery of a new spliceosome doubles the challenge. Trends Biochem Sci. 1997 Apr;22(4):132–137. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(97)01018-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wolff T., Bindereif A. Conformational changes of U6 RNA during the spliceosome cycle: an intramolecular helix is essential both for initiating the U4-U6 interaction and for the first step of slicing. Genes Dev. 1993 Jul;7(7B):1377–1389. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.7b.1377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wu H. J., Gaubier-Comella P., Delseny M., Grellet F., Van Montagu M., Rouzé R. Non-canonical introns are at least 10(9) years old. Nat Genet. 1996 Dec;14(4):383–384. doi: 10.1038/ng1296-383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wu Q., Krainer A. R. AT-AC pre-mRNA splicing mechanisms and conservation of minor introns in voltage-gated ion channel genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1999 May;19(5):3225–3236. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.5.3225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Yu Y. T., Maroney P. A., Darzynkiwicz E., Nilsen T. W. U6 snRNA function in nuclear pre-mRNA splicing: a phosphorothioate interference analysis of the U6 phosphate backbone. RNA. 1995 Mar;1(1):46–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zuker M. Prediction of RNA secondary structure by energy minimization. Methods Mol Biol. 1994;25:267–294. doi: 10.1385/0-89603-276-0:267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from RNA are provided here courtesy of The RNA Society

RESOURCES