In Table 6, Column 2, the percentages reported for “First job ≥150,000 CNY (%)” were transcribed incorrectly during table formatting. The correct values, as reported in Section 3.4.2 of the original text, are 57.24% and 53.12%, respectively. The corresponding results are χ2 = 0.191 and P = 0.909.
Table 6.
Comparison of key indicators between fixed and non-fixed mentorship groups.
| Indicator | Fixed mentorship (n = 328) | No fixed mentorship (n = 60) | Statistic | P-value | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training support satisfaction (mean) | 4.39 | 3.32 | t = 8.62 | <0.001 | Fixed mentorship significantly improves satisfaction |
| First job ≥150,000 CNY (%) | 57.24 | 53.12 | χ2 = 0.191 | 0.909 | No significant salary difference |
| Independent practice adaptation (mean) | 4.59 | 4.38 | t = 0.63 | 0.531 | Similar adaptation, lower satisfaction without mentor |
The corrected Table 6 appears below:
The original version of this article has been updated.
Footnotes
Edited and Reviewed by: Pradeep Nair, Columbia University, United States
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.