Skip to main content
NCBI home page
RNA logoLink to RNA
. 2002 Aug;8(8):981–996. doi: 10.1017/s1355838202024044

Comparative studies of frameshifting and nonframeshifting RNA pseudoknots: a mutational and NMR investigation of pseudoknots derived from the bacteriophage T2 gene 32 mRNA and the retroviral gag-pro frameshift site.

Yue Wang 1, Norma M Wills 1, Zhihua Du 1, Anupama Rangan 1, John F Atkins 1, Raymond F Gesteland 1, David W Hoffman 1
PMCID: PMC1370320  PMID: 12212853

Abstract

Mutational and NMR methods were used to investigate features of sequence, structure, and dynamics that are associated with the ability of a pseudoknot to stimulate a -1 frameshift. In vitro frameshift assays were performed on retroviral gag-pro frameshift-stimulating pseudoknots and their derivatives, a pseudoknot from the gene 32 mRNA of bacteriophage T2 that is not naturally associated with frameshifting, and hybrids of these pseudoknots. Results show that the gag-pro pseudoknot from human endogenous retrovirus-K10 (HERV) stimulates a -1 frameshift with an efficiency similar to that of the closely related retrovirus MMTV. The bacteriophage T2 mRNA pseudoknot was found to be a poor stimulator of frameshifting, supporting a hypothesis that the retroviral pseudoknots have distinctive properties that make them efficient frameshift stimulators. A hybrid, designed by combining features of the bacteriophage and retroviral pseudoknots, was found to stimulate frameshifting while retaining significant structural similarity to the nonframeshifting bacteriophage pseudoknot. Mutational analyses of the retroviral and hybrid pseudoknots were used to evaluate the effects of an unpaired (wedged) adenosine at the junction of the pseudoknot stems, changing the base pairs near the junction of the two stems, and changing the identity of the loop 2 nucleotide nearest the junction of the stems. Pseudoknots both with and without the wedged adenosine can stimulate frameshifting, though the identities of the nucleotides near the stem1/stem2 junction do influence efficiency. NMR data showed that the bacteriophage and hybrid pseudoknots are similar in their local structure at the junction of the stems, indicating that pseudoknots that are similar in this structural feature can differ radically in their ability to stimulate frameshifting. NMR methods were used to compare the internal motions of the bacteriophage T2 pseudoknot and representative frameshifting pseudoknots. The stems of the investigated pseudoknots are similarly well ordered on the time scales to which nitrogen-15 relaxation data are sensitive; however, solvent exchange rates for protons at the junction of the two stems of the nonframeshifting bacteriophage pseudoknot are significantly slower than the analogous protons in the representative frameshifting pseudoknots.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akke M., Fiala R., Jiang F., Patel D., Palmer A. G., 3rd Base dynamics in a UUCG tetraloop RNA hairpin characterized by 15N spin relaxation: correlations with structure and stability. RNA. 1997 Jul;3(7):702–709. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnott S., Hukins D. W., Dover S. D. Optimised parameters for RNA double-helices. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1972 Sep 26;48(6):1392–1399. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(72)90867-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brierley I., Digard P., Inglis S. C. Characterization of an efficient coronavirus ribosomal frameshifting signal: requirement for an RNA pseudoknot. Cell. 1989 May 19;57(4):537–547. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90124-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brierley I. Ribosomal frameshifting viral RNAs. J Gen Virol. 1995 Aug;76(Pt 8):1885–1892. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-76-8-1885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chamorro M., Parkin N., Varmus H. E. An RNA pseudoknot and an optimal heptameric shift site are required for highly efficient ribosomal frameshifting on a retroviral messenger RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jan 15;89(2):713–717. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.2.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen X., Chamorro M., Lee S. I., Shen L. X., Hines J. V., Tinoco I., Jr, Varmus H. E. Structural and functional studies of retroviral RNA pseudoknots involved in ribosomal frameshifting: nucleotides at the junction of the two stems are important for efficient ribosomal frameshifting. EMBO J. 1995 Feb 15;14(4):842–852. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07062.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen X., Kang H., Shen L. X., Chamorro M., Varmus H. E., Tinoco I., Jr A characteristic bent conformation of RNA pseudoknots promotes -1 frameshifting during translation of retroviral RNA. J Mol Biol. 1996 Jul 26;260(4):479–483. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Choi B. S., Redfield A. G. Proton exchange and basepair kinetics of yeast tRNA(Phe) and tRNA(Asp1). J Biochem. 1995 Mar;117(3):515–520. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a124738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dhavan G. M., Lapham J., Yang S., Crothers D. M. Decreased imino proton exchange and base-pair opening in the IHF-DNA complex measured by NMR. J Mol Biol. 1999 May 14;288(4):659–671. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Du Z., Giedroc D. P., Hoffman D. W. Structure of the autoregulatory pseudoknot within the gene 32 messenger RNA of bacteriophages T2 and T6: a model for a possible family of structurally related RNA pseudoknots. Biochemistry. 1996 Apr 2;35(13):4187–4198. doi: 10.1021/bi9527350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Du Z., Holland J. A., Hansen M. R., Giedroc D. P., Hoffman D. W. Base-pairings within the RNA pseudoknot associated with the simian retrovirus-1 gag-pro frameshift site. J Mol Biol. 1997 Jul 18;270(3):464–470. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Egli Martin, Minasov George, Su Li, Rich Alexander. Metal ions and flexibility in a viral RNA pseudoknot at atomic resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Mar 19;99(7):4302–4307. doi: 10.1073/pnas.062055599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Farrow N. A., Muhandiram R., Singer A. U., Pascal S. M., Kay C. M., Gish G., Shoelson S. E., Pawson T., Forman-Kay J. D., Kay L. E. Backbone dynamics of a free and phosphopeptide-complexed Src homology 2 domain studied by 15N NMR relaxation. Biochemistry. 1994 May 17;33(19):5984–6003. doi: 10.1021/bi00185a040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Garcia A., van Duin J., Pleij C. W. Differential response to frameshift signals in eukaryotic and prokaryotic translational systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Feb 11;21(3):401–406. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.3.401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Giedroc D. P., Theimer C. A., Nixon P. L. Structure, stability and function of RNA pseudoknots involved in stimulating ribosomal frameshifting. J Mol Biol. 2000 Apr 28;298(2):167–185. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grentzmann G., Ingram J. A., Kelly P. J., Gesteland R. F., Atkins J. F. A dual-luciferase reporter system for studying recoding signals. RNA. 1998 Apr;4(4):479–486. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Guéron M., Leroy J. L. Studies of base pair kinetics by NMR measurement of proton exchange. Methods Enzymol. 1995;261:383–413. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(95)61018-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Holland J. A., Hansen M. R., Du Z., Hoffman D. W. An examination of coaxial stacking of helical stems in a pseudoknot motif: the gene 32 messenger RNA pseudoknot of bacteriophage T2. RNA. 1999 Feb;5(2):257–271. doi: 10.1017/s1355838299981360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hurd R. E., Reid B. R. Helix-coil dynamics in RNA: the amino acid acceptor helix of Escherichia coli phenylalanine transfer RNA. J Mol Biol. 1980 Sep 15;142(2):181–193. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90044-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jacks T., Townsley K., Varmus H. E., Majors J. Two efficient ribosomal frameshifting events are required for synthesis of mouse mammary tumor virus gag-related polyproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jun;84(12):4298–4302. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.12.4298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnston P. D., Redfield A. G. Study of transfer ribonucleic acid unfolding by dynamic nuclear magnetic resonance. Biochemistry. 1981 Jul 7;20(14):3996–4006. doi: 10.1021/bi00517a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kang H., Hines J. V., Tinoco I., Jr Conformation of a non-frameshifting RNA pseudoknot from mouse mammary tumor virus. J Mol Biol. 1996 May 31;259(1):135–147. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kontos H., Napthine S., Brierley I. Ribosomal pausing at a frameshifter RNA pseudoknot is sensitive to reading phase but shows little correlation with frameshift efficiency. Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Dec;21(24):8657–8670. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.24.8657-8670.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lillemoen J., Cameron C. S., Hoffman D. W. The stability and dynamics of ribosomal protein L9: investigations of a molecular strut by amide proton exchange and circular dichroism. J Mol Biol. 1997 May 2;268(2):482–493. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lillemoen J., Hoffman D. W. An investigation of the dynamics of ribosomal protein L9 using heteronuclear NMR relaxation measurements. J Mol Biol. 1998 Aug 21;281(3):539–551. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liphardt J., Napthine S., Kontos H., Brierley I. Evidence for an RNA pseudoknot loop-helix interaction essential for efficient -1 ribosomal frameshifting. J Mol Biol. 1999 May 7;288(3):321–335. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lopinski J. D., Dinman J. D., Bruenn J. A. Kinetics of ribosomal pausing during programmed -1 translational frameshifting. Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Feb;20(4):1095–1103. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.4.1095-1103.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Luginbühl P., Pervushin K. V., Iwai H., Wüthrich K. Anisotropic molecular rotational diffusion in 15N spin relaxation studies of protein mobility. Biochemistry. 1997 Jun 17;36(24):7305–7312. doi: 10.1021/bi963161h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mandel A. M., Akke M., Palmer A. G., 3rd Backbone dynamics of Escherichia coli ribonuclease HI: correlations with structure and function in an active enzyme. J Mol Biol. 1995 Feb 10;246(1):144–163. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.0073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Matsufuji S., Matsufuji T., Miyazaki Y., Murakami Y., Atkins J. F., Gesteland R. F., Hayashi S. Autoregulatory frameshifting in decoding mammalian ornithine decarboxylase antizyme. Cell. 1995 Jan 13;80(1):51–60. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90450-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Michiels P. J., Versleijen A. A., Verlaan P. W., Pleij C. W., Hilbers C. W., Heus H. A. Solution structure of the pseudoknot of SRV-1 RNA, involved in ribosomal frameshifting. J Mol Biol. 2001 Jul 27;310(5):1109–1123. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Moore R., Dixon M., Smith R., Peters G., Dickson C. Complete nucleotide sequence of a milk-transmitted mouse mammary tumor virus: two frameshift suppression events are required for translation of gag and pol. J Virol. 1987 Feb;61(2):480–490. doi: 10.1128/jvi.61.2.480-490.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Napthine S., Liphardt J., Bloys A., Routledge S., Brierley I. The role of RNA pseudoknot stem 1 length in the promotion of efficient -1 ribosomal frameshifting. J Mol Biol. 1999 May 7;288(3):305–320. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nixon P. L., Giedroc D. P. Energetics of a strongly pH dependent RNA tertiary structure in a frameshifting pseudoknot. J Mol Biol. 2000 Feb 18;296(2):659–671. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ono M., Yasunaga T., Miyata T., Ushikubo H. Nucleotide sequence of human endogenous retrovirus genome related to the mouse mammary tumor virus genome. J Virol. 1986 Nov;60(2):589–598. doi: 10.1128/jvi.60.2.589-598.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Schommer S., Sauter M., Kräusslich H. G., Best B., Mueller-Lantzsch N. Characterization of the human endogenous retrovirus K proteinase. J Gen Virol. 1996 Feb;77(Pt 2):375–379. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-77-2-375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Shen L. X., Tinoco I., Jr The structure of an RNA pseudoknot that causes efficient frameshifting in mouse mammary tumor virus. J Mol Biol. 1995 Apr 14;247(5):963–978. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Somogyi P., Jenner A. J., Brierley I., Inglis S. C. Ribosomal pausing during translation of an RNA pseudoknot. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Nov;13(11):6931–6940. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.11.6931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Spera S., Ikura M., Bax A. Measurement of the exchange rates of rapidly exchanging amide protons: application to the study of calmodulin and its complex with a myosin light chain kinase fragment. J Biomol NMR. 1991 Jul;1(2):155–165. doi: 10.1007/BF01877227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Su L., Chen L., Egli M., Berger J. M., Rich A. Minor groove RNA triplex in the crystal structure of a ribosomal frameshifting viral pseudoknot. Nat Struct Biol. 1999 Mar;6(3):285–292. doi: 10.1038/6722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Theimer C. A., Giedroc D. P. Contribution of the intercalated adenosine at the helical junction to the stability of the gag-pro frameshifting pseudoknot from mouse mammary tumor virus. RNA. 2000 Mar;6(3):409–421. doi: 10.1017/s1355838200992057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Theimer C. A., Giedroc D. P. Equilibrium unfolding pathway of an H-type RNA pseudoknot which promotes programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting. J Mol Biol. 1999 Jun 25;289(5):1283–1299. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tu C., Tzeng T. H., Bruenn J. A. Ribosomal movement impeded at a pseudoknot required for frameshifting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 15;89(18):8636–8640. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.18.8636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Voet D., Rich A. The crystal structures of purines, pyrimidines and their intermolecular complexes. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1970;10:183–265. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60565-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yoshinaka Y., Katoh I., Copeland T. D., Oroszlan S. Murine leukemia virus protease is encoded by the gag-pol gene and is synthesized through suppression of an amber termination codon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Mar;82(6):1618–1622. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.6.1618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. ten Dam E. B., Verlaan P. W., Pleij C. W. Analysis of the role of the pseudoknot component in the SRV-1 gag-pro ribosomal frameshift signal: loop lengths and stability of the stem regions. RNA. 1995 Apr;1(2):146–154. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. ten Dam E., Brierley I., Inglis S., Pleij C. Identification and analysis of the pseudoknot-containing gag-pro ribosomal frameshift signal of simian retrovirus-1. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Jun 25;22(12):2304–2310. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.12.2304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from RNA are provided here courtesy of The RNA Society

RESOURCES