Abstract
A total of 114 patients who had not attended their general practitioner in the previous three years were identified by searching a sample of 1488 records (12.8% of the practice list). An invitation for a health check was sent, in keeping with the requirements of the new general practitioner contract. Seventeen out of 94 patients invited (18%) attended. Surgery staff spent 28 hours and the practice doctors spent 15 hours on arranging and carrying out the investigation. The group responding to the invitation were in general healthy; the only new finding of remediable disease was mild hypertension in one man. The smoking rate and alcohol consumption rate were low. Of 13 patients who needed tetanus immunization, five refused it and five failed to return. All three women who were overdue for a cervical smear failed to return to have it done. It is concluded that screening infrequent attenders is not an efficient use of medical time.
Full text
PDFSelected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Macdonald L. A., Sackett D. L., Haynes R. B., Taylor D. W. Labelling in hypertension: a review of the behavioural and psychological consequences. J Chronic Dis. 1984;37(12):933–942. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(84)90070-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olsen D. M., Kane R. L., Proctor P. H. A controlled trial of multiphasic screening. N Engl J Med. 1976 Apr 22;294(17):925–930. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197604222941705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sackett D. L. Screening in family practice: prevention, levels of evidence, and the pitfalls of common sense. J Fam Pract. 1987 Mar;24(3):233–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stoate H. G. Can health screening damage your health? J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 May;39(322):193–195. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]