Abstract
The Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap (NHG), the college of general practitioners in the Netherlands, has begun a national programme of standard setting for the quality of care in general practice. When the standards have been drawn up and assessed they are disseminated via the journal Huisarts en Wetenschap. In a survey, carried out among a randomized sample of 10% of all general practitioners, attitudes towards national standard setting in general and to the first set of standards (diabetes care) were studied. The response was 70% (453 doctors). A majority of the respondents said they were well informed about the national standard setting initiatives instigated by the NHG (71%) and about the content of the first standards (77%). The general practitioners had a positive attitude towards the setting of national standards for quality of care, and this was particularly true for doctors who were members of the NHG. Although a large majority of doctors said they agreed with most of the guidelines in the diabetes standards fewer respondents were actually working to the guidelines and some of the standards are certain to meet with a lot of resistance. A better knowledge of the standards and a more positive attitude to the process of national standard setting correlated with a more positive attitude to the guidelines formulated in the diabetes standards. The results could serve as a starting point for an exchange of views about standard setting in general practice in other countries.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Donabedian A. Criteria and standards for quality assessment and monitoring. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1986 Mar;12(3):99–108. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30021-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fowler G., Mant D., Fuller A., Jones L. The "Help Your Patient Stop" initiative. Evaluation of smoking prevalence and dissemination of WHO/UICC guidelines in UK general practice. Lancet. 1989 Jun 3;1(8649):1253–1255. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92342-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greer A. L. The two cultures of biomedicine: can there be consensus? JAMA. 1987 Nov 20;258(19):2739–2740. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Irvine D. H. Standards in general practice: the quality initiative revisited. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Feb;40(331):75–77. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanouse D. E., Jacoby I. When does information change practitioners' behavior? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1988;4(1):27–33. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300003214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kosecoff J., Kanouse D. E., Rogers W. H., McCloskey L., Winslow C. M., Brook R. H. Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice. JAMA. 1987 Nov 20;258(19):2708–2713. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lomas J., Anderson G. M., Domnick-Pierre K., Vayda E., Enkin M. W., Hannah W. J. Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med. 1989 Nov 9;321(19):1306–1311. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198911093211906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Riesenberg D. Consensus conferences. JAMA. 1987 Nov 20;258(19):2738–2738. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanazaro P. J. Determining physicians' performance. Continuing medical education and other interacting variables. Eval Health Prof. 1983 Jun;6(2):197–210. doi: 10.1177/016327878300600205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]