Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Jul 28;32(40):e71491. doi: 10.1002/chem.71491

N‐Sulfonyl Azalevoglucosan: A Versatile Platform for the Synthesis of Polysubstituted Piperidines

Dylan Yorga 1, Jérôme Marrot 2, Ana Poveda 3,4,5,6, Nicolas Auberger 1, Jesús Jiménez‐Barbero 3,4,5,6, Jérôme Désiré 1,✉, Yves Blériot 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13716014  PMID: 42521324

ABSTRACT

Substituted piperidines are key synthetic fragments for designing drugs and play a significant role in the pharmaceutical industry. The reported synthetic methods allow access to mono‐, di‐, and tri‐substituted piperidines, but tetra‐ and penta‐substituted piperidines are scarce in the literature. In this study, exploiting the inherent chirality of iminosugars, we report the synthesis of a levoglucosan mimic in which the endocyclic oxygen of the pyranose ring has been replaced by a N‐sulfonyl group. The trans diaxial arrangement of its hydroxyl groups allows navigation on the piperidine ring to iteratively install functional groups at C1, C2, C3, C4, and C6 positions using simple experimental protocols with minimal protecting group manipulation. The broad functional group scope combined with the high regio‐ and stereo‐selectivity make this approach an appealing process for diversity‐oriented synthesis of polysubstituted piperidines, including modified iminosugars. We expect this platform will support drug discovery efforts to accelerate the discovery of therapeutically relevant molecules.

Keywords: hemiaminal, iminosugar, levoglucosan, N‐sulfonyl, piperidine


Gain by strain: The synthesis of a levoglucosan analog, in which the pyranose oxygen has been replaced by a nitrogen, allows navigation on the piperidine ring to iteratively install functional groups at C1, C2, C3, C4, and C6 positions using simple experimental protocols with minimal protecting group manipulation. The broad functional group scope combined with the high regio‐ and stereo‐selectivity pave the way to polysubstituted piperidines bearing five contiguous functions.

graphic file with name CHEM-32-e71491-g006.webp

1. Introduction

The piperidine ring ranks amongst one of the most popular heterocycle motifs in FDA‐approved pharmaceuticals (Figure 1A) [1, 2]. Complex piperidines are becoming more popular [3] as drug discovery gradually moves toward nonplanar, more topologically complex cyclic molecular frameworks [4]. The modular synthesis of such scaffolds with precise stereochemical control is complex [5] and development of new synthetic methods for complex piperidines has been therefore continuously and actively pursued [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. The reported general methods include intramolecular cyclization, [12] intermolecular cycloaddition, [13, 14] dearomative saturation of pyridines [15, 16, 17], and direct C–H functionalization of simple piperidines, [18, 19, 20, 21] allowing access to mono‐, di‐, and tri‐substituted piperidines. However, reports of therapeutically relevant tetra‐ and penta‐substituted piperidines are scarce in the literature [22] (Figure 1B).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

(A) Common nitrogen‐heterocycle motifs in FDA‐approved small‐molecule drugs. (B) Substitution pattern in US FDA‐approved pharmaceuticals containing piperidines. (C) Synthetic utility of levoglucosan and Cerny epoxide. (D) Overview of the current study.

In the 60's, the group of Cerny has made a major contribution to the chemistry of carbohydrates, achieving the differentiation among secondary hydroxyl groups of comparable reactivity using levoglucosan, a conformationally locked 1,6‐anhydrosugar (Figure 1C) [23]. The 1,6‐anhydro core prevents protection of both 6‐OH and anomeric positions and facilitates navigation on the pyran ring to install functional groups using simple experimental protocols. Furthermore, the trans diaxial arrangement of the secondary hydroxyl groups allows a minimal use of protection/deprotection cycles and excellent regio‐ and stereo‐control. Since, levoglucosan and related Cerny epoxide [24] have been used by many groups to access carbohydrate derivatives of biological interest, including glycosaminoglycans, [25] iminosugars, [26] cyclodextrin analogs, [27] fluorinated monosaccharides [28], and glycosyl donors [29]. We postulate that exploitation of an “azalevoglucosan”, in which the pyran ring is replaced by a piperidine ring and the acetal bridge replaced by a hemiaminal, should enable the site‐selective C─O bond editing of the piperidine C2, C3, and C4 positions. In addition, ring opening of the hemiaminal bridge should allow the C─O bond editing of C1 and C6 positions, providing pentadifferentiated piperidines (Figure 1D).

2. Results and Discussion

Ideally, the synthesis of azalevoglucosan should start from naturally occurring nojirimycin, a glucopyranose analog [30]. However, its cost as bisulfite adduct ($1000/25 mgs) forced us to design an alternative route from tetra‐O‐benzyl‐d‐gluconolactam 1, available in three steps and 64% yield from commercial tetra‐O‐benzyl glucose (Scheme 1) [31]. A robust N‐tosyl group, that should advantageously avoid formation of rotamers and lead to crystalline compounds, was installed to produce lactam 1’. Its regioselective debenzylation at C6 position was achieved with FeCl3 in acetic anhydride [32] to furnish ester 2 (59% yield over two steps).

SCHEME 1.

SCHEME 1

Synthesis of N‐tosyl azalevoglucosan 4 and reactive congeners 5–9.

Bridging the C1 and C6 positions was performed via reduction of the lactam and ester with DIBAL at −78°C and subsequent treatment of the crude product with camphor sulfonic acid, to furnish bicyclic hemiaminal 3 (77% yield over two steps), via interception of the iminium intermediate by the primary alcohol [33]. Subsequent optimized hydrogenolysis combining Pd black, 10% Pd/C, and HCOONH4 quantitatively afforded N‐tosyl azalevoglucosan 4. The structure of this bench‐stable bicycle was firmly established by x‐ray crystallography (CCDC 2447469), confirming the trans diaxial arrangement of the three secondary hydroxyl groups. Such derivative is unprecedented in the literature albeit some stereoisomers have been reported [34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40]. As for levoglucosan, a gradual reactivity of the three secondary OH groups in 4 was expected to access a range of Cerny‐like epoxides that are required to regio‐ and stereo‐selectively functionalize the piperidine ring. Satisfyingly, applying Mitsunobu conditions (PMe3, TMAD) [41] provided a mixture of 2,3‐ and 3,4‐exo‐epoxides 5 and 6 (CCDC 2487464) in 89% yield (7:2 ratio). In parallel, tosylation (TsCl, DMAP, pyridine) of triol 4 furnished the 2,4‐ditosyl derivative 7 in 86% yield, which afforded the 3,4‐endo‐epoxide 8 in 97% yield upon treatment with sodium methoxide. In addition, the 2,3‐endo‐epoxide 9 was obtained in 50% yield from epoxide 8 through opening with benzyl alcohol in the presence of BF3.OEt2 followed by treatment with NaOMe. With the four epoxides 5, 6, 8 and 9 and the ditosyl derivative 7 in hand, introduction of new functions through fluorination, azidation, and alkylation, either via alcohol SN2 substitution or regio‐ and stereo‐selective nucleophilic epoxide opening, was scrutinized. Indeed, piperidines bearing fluorine atoms have proved useful in pharmaceutical and agrochemical research [42]. Azide group has been extensively used as a masked amine and as partner for click chemistry reactions [43]. Alkylated piperidine motifs are often found in natural products [44].

Diversification of the C2 position [45] was first examined. Treatment of epoxyalcohol 6 with Tf2O followed by sodium azide gave the corresponding C2‐azide 10a with retention of configuration (32% yield) along with a rearranged product 10b (32% yield, CCDC 2447468) (Scheme 2A), suggesting the formation and opening of a transient oxiranium intermediate. This illustrates the strong migratory aptitude of the 1,6‐oxygenated bridge, as previously observed with levoglucosan [46], which forced us to examine the alternative ring opening of epoxide 9. Satisfyingly, treatment of 9 with NaN3 at 120°C for 48 h provided the expected C2‐azide 10c (56% yield, 80% yield brsm). This regio‐ and stereo‐selectivity was further exemplified by introducing a fluorine atom with KHF2 at 210°C [47] to yield the fluorinated bicycle 10d, albeit in modest 29% yield. Introduction of an allyl group was also successful using AllMgBr (10 equiv.) and CuI (5 equiv.) in THF [48] to afford the allyl derivative 10e in 61% yield (Scheme 2B).

SCHEME 2.

SCHEME 2

(A) Azidation of epoxide 6; (B) One step C─O bond editing of C2, C3, and/or C4 positions from precursors 5–9; (a) NaN3, DMF, 120°C, sealed tube, 48 h; (b) NaN3, DMF, 90°C, overnight; (c) Tf2O, CH2Cl2, 0°C then NaN3 DMF, rt, (d) NaN3, DMF, MW, 150 W, 150°C, 30 min; (e) KHF2, ethylene glycol, 170°C or 210°C, 2 h; (f) CH2=CHMgBr, Et2O, rt, overnight; (g) Tf2O, CH2Cl2, 0°C then TBAF.3H2O, CH2Cl2, rt, 48 h; (h) RMgBr, CuI, THF/H2O, rt; (i) MeONa, MeOH.

Diversification of the C3 position was investigated next from the mixture of epoxides 5 and 6. Their azidation with NaN3 in DMF at 90°C for 24 h quantitatively provided C3‐azide 10f. Alkylation (RMgX, CuI) was also successful as a methyl group (10 g; CCDC 2447466) or an allyl group (10 h; CCDC 2447465) were installed in 39% and 50% yields, respectively. However, when the reaction was performed with vinyl magnesium bromide to install a vinyl group as a CH2OH group precursor, only the bromohydrin 10i (CCDC 2447465) was isolated in 47% yield (Scheme 2B) [49].

Diversification of the C4 position was then examined through OH‐4 group nucleophilic substitution. Unlike C2 position, migration of the 1,6‐oxygenated bridge was not observed, and treatment of hydroxyepoxide 5 with Tf2O in CH2Cl2 followed by NaN3 in DMF for 48 h furnished inverted azide 10j in 55% yield. A fluorine atom was also successfully introduced at C4 position using TBAF.3H2O [28] to afford fluoro‐epoxide 10k (64% yield, CCDC 2447467). In parallel, regioselective opening of epoxide 8 with AllMgBr (10 equiv.) and CuI (5 equiv.) produced C4‐allyl derivative 10l in 60% yield (Scheme 2B).

Encouraged by these results, concomitant functionalization of the C2 and C4 positions to simultaneously and stereoselectively install the same function at two different positions on the piperidine ring was briefly investigated from ditosyl derivative 7. While reaction with NaN3 in DMF at 80°C furnished a complex mixture of mono‐ and diazides, the same reaction performed under microwave irradiation cleanly afforded the diazide 10m in 48% yield with complete retention of configuration [50]. Introduction of two fluorine atoms using KHF2 [28] was also successful, leading to difluoro derivative 10n, albeit in modest 16% yield. Installation of two allyl groups was also achieved from monoallyl derivative 10l, through formation of a 2,3‐endo‐epoxide under basic conditions followed by treatment with AllMgBr (10 equiv.) and CuI (5 equiv.) to furnish the diallyl derivative 10o in 41% yield over two steps. Having achieved the regio‐ and stereoselective diversification of the N‐tosyl azalevoglucosan C2, C3, and C4 positions, C─O bond editing of the C1 position was then scrutinized.

Reductive ring opening of the bicyclic hemiaminal core should give access to piperidines that can be seen as modified iminoalditols, an important class of naturally occurring tetrahydroxylated piperidines [51] that serve as lead molecules for the treatment of diabetes, viral infections, inflammation, tumor growth, and lysosomal storage disorders [52]. To achieve this reaction, screening of a small range of Lewis acids (BF3.OEt2, TMSOTf, and TiCl4) in the presence of triethylsilane identified TiCl4 as the best Lewis acid in agreement with the literature [53, 54]. Treatment of hemiaminal 3 with Et3SiH and TiCl4 furnished partially protected iminoalditol 11a in 66% yield, This reaction was also successful with hemiaminals 7, 10f, and 10l to afford the corresponding tetrasubstituted N‐tosyl piperidines 11b‐d in 44%–58% yield (Figure 2a). Accessing modified iminoalditols with a free endocyclic amine is also of interest to allow further amine coupling or to derivatize the nitrogen atom. Accordingly, treatment of hemiaminal 3 with LiAlH4 concomitantly reduced the hemiaminal bridge and removed the N‐Ts group to provide the piperidine 12a in 78% yield. These conditions were then successfully applied to N‐tosyl azalevoglucosans 6, 10o, and 10f, some of them being previously per‐O‐benzylated for purification issues, to yield the corresponding tri‐ and tetrasubstituted piperidines 12b–d in 36%–51% yield after column chromatography (Figure 2b).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

C1─O bond editing through hemiaminal ring opening. (a) Synthesis of tetrasubstituted N‐tosyl piperidines 11. (b) Synthesis of tri‐ and tetra‐substituted NH‐free piperidines 12. (c) Synthesis of pentasubstituted piperidines 13 and model to tentatively rationalize the stereochemical outcome of the reaction.

Capitalizing on the reductive cleavage of the N‐tosyl azalevoglucosan, introduction of an additional function at C1 position was then studied to reach pentasubstituted piperidines (Figure 2c). Fully O‐benzylated hemiaminal 3 was used as a model substrate. Its treatment with allyltrimethylsilane and TiCl4 afforded a separable mixture of α‐C‐allyl piperidine 13aα (36%) and β‐C‐allyl piperidine 13aβ (47%) (Figure 2c). Similarly, reaction with TMSN3 furnished α‐configured C1‐azido piperidine 13bα (35% yield) and β‐configured 13bβ (42% yield). The absence of stereocontrol in this reaction was rationalized as follows. An iminium intermediate adopting a 4H3 conformation can be invoked to account for the formation of the α−configured compounds [55]. The same iminium intermediate in which the aromatic ring of the N‐Ts group stacks below the piperidine ring could drive the formation of the β−configured compounds (Figure 2c) as suggested by the upcoming conformational analysis of the N‐tosyl pentasubstituted piperidines.

This reaction was also successful with TMSCN, exclusively providing the α‐C1‐cyano piperidine 13c in 75% yield because of the anomeric effect [37]. The compatibility of this transformation with functionalized azalevoglucosan derivatives was also examined. Azidation of ditosyl derivative 7 produced azidopiperidine 13d as a single β‐configured isomer, albeit in low 23% yield while cyanation of hemiaminals 10e and 10f furnished α‐configured piperidines 13e (25% yield; CCDC 2490189) and 13f (41% yield).

Finally, the iterative potential of this strategy was showcased with the aim to install a different functional group in a regio‐ and stereoselective manner on each piperidine's carbon in a stepwise manner. For our purpose, epoxide 6 was benzylated to afford epoxide 14 in 66% yield (Scheme 3a). Regioselective epoxide opening with sodium azide yielded azidoalcohol 15 (80% yield). Subsequent deoxyfluorination of the free alcohol with Tf2O and TBAF operated with inversion of configuration to afford hemiaminal 16 (71% yield) bearing three distinct functions at C2, C3, and C4 positions. Treatment of 16 with TMSAll and TiCl4 stereoselectively provided pentadifferentiated (1S, 2R, 3R, 4R, 5R) piperidine 17 in 39% yield. To further illustrate this stepwise approach, an aza analog of anhydro‐N‐acetyl muramic acid (anhNAM) [56], a 1,6‐anhydrosugar involved in peptidoglycan recycling in Gram‐negative bacteria, was targeted. Starting from azide 10c, introduction of the lactate moiety at C3 position was achieved by treatment with the known triflate 18 [57] to afford ester 19 (CCDC 2447464) in 74% yield (Scheme 3b). Conversion of the azido group into an acetamide with triphenyl phosphine and aqueous ammonia followed by treatment with acetic anhydride gave acetamide 20 (53% yield). Final mild ester hydrolysis with 1 M LiOH in THF/dioxane (2/1) followed by hydrogenolysis (Pd(OH)2/C, H2) quantitatively afforded anhNAM analog 21.

SCHEME 3.

SCHEME 3

(a) Iterative, regio‐ and stereoselective introduction of functional groups on all the five contiguous carbons of a piperidine ring to produce pentadifferentiated piperidine 17. (b) Synthesis of an aza analog 21 of anhydro‐N‐acetyl muramic acid and x‐ray structure of compound 19.

The conformation of the N‐Ts pentasubstituted piperidines 13a‐f and 17 was studied by NMR assisted by DFT calculations. In these molecules, the presence of the endocyclic sulfamido group forces the nitrogen atom to adopt a pyramidal–planar geometry, which in turn distorts the piperidine ring away from the canonical chair conformation. In addition, bulky substituents, electrostatic interactions, and solvent polarity further broaden the conformational landscape. These computed‐expected effects became particularly evident for azidopiperidine 13b, for which both α‐ (13bα) and β‐ (13bβ) conformers were independently examined. For the α‐epimer in CDCl3, the J 2,3, J 3,4, and J 4,5 coupling constant values (9.0, 8.9, and 9.0 Hz, respectively) correspond to axial–axial relationships, characteristic of the canonical 4 C 1 chair conformation. The J 1,2 coupling constant (3.6 Hz) is typical of the equatorial–axial arrangement expected for the α‐anomer. Interestingly, the OH‐6 proton displays well defined coupling constants (4.1 Hz and 11.4 Hz) to the H‐6 protons, consistent with the existence of a hydrogen bond formed between OH‐6 and one oxygen atoms at the tosyl (Ts) group. The J 5,6 and J 5,6’ coupling values, both around 2.2 Hz, agree with a very predominant gauche–gauche (gg) arrangement around the hydroxymethyl group. NOE correlations between the tosyl aromatic protons (2/6‐Ts) and H‐1 (weak), H‐5 (weak), and H‐6 proS (strong) further support this arrangement and define the orientation of the aromatic ring relative to the pyranose framework (Figure 3a). For azidopiperidine 13bβ, the J 2,3 and J 3,4 values (both close to 8 Hz) suggest near axial–axial relationships, consistent with the benzyloxy substituents adopting pseudo‐equatorial positions. However, the J 1,2 (4.4 Hz) and J 4,5 (3.6 Hz) encode gauche‐like relationships (axial‐equatorial or related arrangements). A small, but measurable long‐range J 1,5 coupling (0.4–0.5 Hz) indicates a W‐type arrangement, consistent with both protons displaying pseudo‐equatorial orientations. These findings point to a distortion of the chair conformation in the vicinity of the nitrogen atom. Unlike the α‐analogue, the OH‐6 proton appears as a broad signal, suggesting motion around the H6─O6 bond, consistent with the absence of stabilizing intramolecular hydrogen bonding. Accordingly, the J 5,6 and J 5,6’ coupling values, (5.1 and 5.6 Hz) reflect a dynamic equilibrium between the gg and gt conformations of the C5─C6 hydroxymethyl bond. The tosyl aromatic protons (2/6‐Ts) show NOEs with all H‐1, H‐5, and H‐3, confirming that the Ts group lies on the non‐polar face of the β‐conformer. Additional NOEs between H‐6/H‐6′ and both H‐2 and H‐4 define the spatial relationships around the C5─C6 region. Taken together, these data support a 2 S N ring conformation as the predominant solution geometry of 13bβ (Figure 3b). Indeed, the expected (MSPIN‐calculated J‐values) for this 2 S N geometry are in good agreement with the experimental values (see Table S1). For the other pentasubstituted piperidines 13a and 13c‐f, the scalar coupling analysis strongly suggests the existence of conformational equilibria, since the observed values are not consistent with a single conformation (see Table S2). Notably, the X‐ray crystallographic structure of 13e shows a 5 S 1 conformation in the solid state, while the analysis of the solution‐phase J coupling constants reveals the presence of a 60:40 conformational equilibrium between the crystallographic 5 S 1 skew boat and the 4 C 1 chair (see Table S3). For pentadifferentiated piperidine 17, NOEs between H‐1 and H‐3, and between H‐6,6' and the allyl CH2 group confirmed the β‐configuration at C1 position. The observed J 1,2, J2 ,3, J 3,4 and J 4,5 coupling constants values (<2, 6.9, <2, 5.6, respectively) are in good agreement with those obtained by DFT in Gaussian (0.7, 7.7, 1.9, 5.9 respectively), and all these findings are in full agreement with a 1 S 3 ring conformation, flattened around the nitrogen atom (Figure 3c).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

(a) Proposed major 4 C 1 conformer for 1‐azidopiperidine 13bα. (b) Proposed major 2 S N conformer for 1‐azidopiperidine 13bβ. (c) Proposed major 1 S 3 conformer for 1‐allylpiperidine 17. The OPLS4 force field as implemented in Macromodel within the Maestro suite of programs was employed.

3. Conclusion

In conclusion, we have developed a robust synthesis of a N‐Ts azalevoglucosan derived from naturally occurring nojirimycin. As for levoglucosan, its 1,6‐anhydro bridge allows navigation on the piperidine ring to install, in a regio‐ and stereoselective manner, functional groups at C2, C3, and C4 positions. Moreover, the cleavage of its hemiaminal moiety gives access to piperidines with an additional function at C1 position. This approach is complementary to the aza‐Achmatowicz reaction [39]. The synthetic potential of this platform was illustrated by the iterative syntheses of an aza analog of anhydro‐muramic acid 21 and a pentadifferentiated (1S, 2R, 3R, 4R, 5R) 1‐allyl, 2‐benzyloxy‐, 3‐azido, 4‐fluoro, 5‐hydroxymethyl piperidine 17. The platform reported herein should be useful in the glycomimetic field to access unprecedented iminosugar derivatives and in medicinal chemistry, where polysubstituted piperidine motifs are becoming increasingly popular.

4. Experimental Section

Experimental procedures and characterization data are available in the Supporting Information file. The authors have cited additional references within the Supporting Information [51, 52]. Deposition Number(s) 2447469 (for 4), 2487464 (for 6), 2447468 (for 10b), 2447466 (for 10g), 2447465 (for 10h), 2447465 (for 10i), 2447467 (for 10k), 2490189 (for 13e), 24474664 (for 19) contain(s) the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe Access Structures service.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

Supporting File 1: chem71491‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx

CHEM-32-e71491-s001.docx (9.4MB, docx)

Acknowledgments

D. Y. thanks Poitiers University and Région Nouvelle Aquitaine for a PhD grant. The authors acknowledge financial support from the European Union (ERDF) and Région Nouvelle Aquitaine. This work pertains to the French government program “Investissements d'Avenir” (EUR INTREE, reference ANR‐18‐EURE‐0010). We gratefully acknowledge the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (IRP Project GLYCOMIMIC). We acknowledge funding from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (MICINN/AEI/FEDER, UE, PID2020‐118893GB‐100 and PDI2021‐1237810B‐C21), the Spanish Structures of Excellence María de Maeztu (CEX2021‐001202‐M) and Severo Ochoa (CEX2021‐001136‐S), all funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033.

Open access publication funding provided by COUPERIN CY26.

Yorga D., Marrot J., Poveda A., et al. “ N‐Sulfonyl Azalevoglucosan: A Versatile Platform for the Synthesis of Polysubstituted Piperidines.” Chemistry – A European Journal 32, no. 40 (2026): e71491. 10.1002/chem.71491

Institute and/or researcher Twitter usernames: @YvesBleriot

Contributor Information

Jérôme Désiré, Email: jerome.desire@univ-poitiers.fr.

Yves Blériot, Email: yves.bleriot@univ-poitiers.fr.

Data Availability Statement

The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the Supporting Information of this article.

References

  • 1. Shearer J., Castro J. L., Lawson A. D. G., MacCoss M., and Taylor R. D., “Rings in Clinical Trials and Drugs: Present and Future,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 65 (2022): 8699–8712, 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Vitaku E., Smith D. T., and Njardarson J. T., “Analysis of the Structural Diversity, Substitution Patterns, and Frequency of Nitrogen Heterocycles Among U.S. FDA Approved Pharmaceuticals,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 57 (2014): 10257–10274, 10.1021/jm501100b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Chen Q.‐S., Li J.‐Q., and Zhang Q.‐W., “Application of Chiral Piperidine Scaffolds in Drug Design,” Pharmaceutical Fronts 5 (2023): e1–e14. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lovering F., “Escape From Flatland 2: Complexity and Promiscuity,” MedChemComm 4 (2012): 515, 10.1039/c2md20347b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Frolov N. A. and Vereshchagin A. N., “Piperidine Derivatives: Recent Advances in Synthesis and Pharmacological Applications,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24 (2023): 2937, 10.3390/ijms24032937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Despois A. and Cramer N., “Iridium(III)‐Catalysed Ionic Hydrogenation of Pyridines to Multisubstituted Piperidines,” Nature Chemistry 18 (2026): 526–534, 10.1038/s41557-025-02008-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ou W. and Huang P.‐Q., “Direct Reductive Transformation of Amides: From Methodology Development to Applications in Total Synthesis,” Accounts of Chemical Research 58 (2025): 2332–2349, 10.1021/acs.accounts.5c00366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Klose I., Di Mauro G., Kaldre D., and Maulide N., “Inverse Hydride Shuttle Catalysis Enables the Stereoselective One‐Step Synthesis of Complex Frameworks,” Nature Chemistry 14 (2022): 1306–1310, 10.1038/s41557-022-00991-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Wijdeven M. A., Willemsen J., and Rutjes F. P. J. T., “The 3‐Hydroxypiperidine Skeleton: Key Element in Natural Product Synthesis,” European Journal of Organic Chemistry 2010 (2010): 2831–2844, 10.1002/ejoc.200901494. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Yazici A. and Pyne S. G., “Intermolecular Addition Reactions of N‐Acyliminium Ions (Part I),” Synthesis 2009 (2009): 339–368. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Yazici A. and Pyne S. G., “Intermolecular Addition Reactions of N‐Acyliminium Ions (Part II),” Synthesis 2009 (2009): 513–541. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ma X., Hazelden I. R., Langer T., Munday R. H., and Bower J. F., “Enantioselective aza‐Heck Cyclizations of N‐(tosyloxy) Carbamates: Synthesis of Pyrrolidines and Piperidines,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 141 (2019): 3356–3360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Reymond S. and Cossy J., “Copper‐Catalyzed Diels−Alder Reactions,” Chemical Reviews 108 (2008): 5359–5406, 10.1021/cr078346g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Monbaliu J.‐C. M., Masschelein K. G. R., and Stevens C. V., “Electron‐Deficient 1‐ and 2‐Azabuta‐1,3‐Dienes: A Comprehensive Survey of Their Synthesis and Reactivity,” Chemical Society Reviews 40 (2011): 4708, 10.1039/c1cs15070g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wu J., Chen Z., Barnard J. H., et al., “Synthesis of Chiral Piperidines From Pyridinium Salts via Rhodium‐Catalysed Transfer Hydrogenation,” Nature Catalysis 5 (2022): 982–992, 10.1038/s41929-022-00857-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Siddiqi Z., Bingham T. W., Shimakawa T., Hesp K. D., Shavnya A., and Sarlah D., “Oxidative Dearomatization of Pyridines,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 146 (2024): 2358–2363, 10.1021/jacs.3c13603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hu M., Ding H., DeSnoo W., Tantillo D. J., and Nairoukh Z., “The Construction of Highly Substituted Piperidines via Dearomative Functionalization Reaction,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62 (2023): e202315108, 10.1002/anie.202315108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Shu X., Zhong D., Huang Q., Huan L., and Huo H., “Site‐ and Enantioselective Cross‐Coupling of Saturated N‐Heterocycles With Carboxylic Acids by Cooperative Ni/Photoredox Catalysis,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 125, 10.1038/s41467-023-35800-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Chen M., Ventura A. M., Das S., Ibrahim A. F., Zimmerman P. M., and Montgomery J., “Oxidative Cross Dehydrogenative Coupling of N ‐Heterocycles With Aldehydes Through C( s3 )–H Functionalization,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145 (2023): 20176–20181, 10.1021/jacs.3c06532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Dutta S., Kim J. H., Bhatt K., et al., “Alicyclic‐Amine‐Derived Imine‐BF3 Complexes: Easy‐to‐Make Building Blocks for the Synthesis of Valuable α‐Functionalized Azacycles,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 63 (2024): e202313247, 10.1002/anie.202313247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. He J., Yokoi K., Wixted B., et al., “Biocatalytic C–H Oxidation Meets Radical Cross‐Coupling: Simplifying Complex Piperidine Synthesis,” Science 386 (2024): 1421–1427, 10.1126/science.adr9368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. McCafferty E. H. and Scott L. J., “Migalastat: A Review in Fabry Disease,” Drugs 79 (2019): 543–554, 10.1007/s40265-019-01090-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Itabaiana Junior I., Avelar do Nascimento M., de Souza R. O. M. A., Dufour A., and Wojcieszak R., “Levoglucosan: A Promising Platform Molecule?,” Green Chemistry 22 (2020): 5859–5880, 10.1039/D0GC01490G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Cerný M., “Chemistry of Anhydrosugars,” Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry 58 (2003): 121–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Arndt S. and Hsieh‐Wilson L. C., “Use of Cerny Epoxides for the Accelerated Synthesis of Glycosaminoglycans,” Organic Letters 5 (2003): 4179–4182, 10.1021/ol035606h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Jespersen T. M., Bols M., Sierks M. R., and Skrydstrup T., “Synthesis of Isofagomine, a Novel Glycosidase Inhibitor,” Tetrahedron 50 (1994): 13449–13460, 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)89351-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Stichler‐Bonaparte J., Bernet B., and Vasella A., “Oligosaccharide Analogues of Polysaccharides Part 25,” Helvetica Chimica Acta 85 (2002): 2235–2257, 10.1002/1522-2675(200208)85:8<2235::AID-HLCA2235>3.0.CO;2-I. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Denavit V., Lainé D., St‐Gelais J., Johnson P. A., and Giguère D., “A Chiron Approach Towards the Stereoselective Synthesis of Polyfluorinated Carbohydrates,” Nature Communications 9 (2018): 4721, 10.1038/s41467-018-06901-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Fang T., Gu Y., Huang W., and Boons G.‐J., “Mechanism of Glycosylation of Anomeric Sulfonium Ions,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 138 (2016): 3002–3011, 10.1021/jacs.5b08436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Shida N., Kumagai K., Niida T., Hamamoto K., and Shomura T., “Nojirimycin, a new antibiotic. I. Taxonomy and fermentation,” Journal of Antibiotics 20 (1967): 62–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Overkleeft H. S., van Wiltenburg J., and Pandit U. K., “A Facile Transformation of Sugar Lactones to Azasugars,” Tetrahedron 50 (1994): 4215–4224, 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)86715-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Overkleeft H. S. and Pandit U. K., “A Formal Synthesis of Castanospermine Using an Olefin Metathesis Cyclisation Reaction as a Key Step,” Tetrahedron Letters 37 (1996): 547–550, 10.1016/0040-4039(95)02237-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ramsden N. G., Fleet G. W. J., and Namgoong S. K., “Interception of an Iminium Ion Equivalent by Intramolecular Nucleophilic Attack by a Silyl Ether During Lithium Aluminium Hydride Reduction of a Tertiary Lactam,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2 (1991): 1991, 10.1039/p29910001991. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ostrowski J., Altenbach H.‐J., Wischnat R., and Brauer D. J., “An Aza Analogue of iso‐Levoglucosenone: Synthesis and Application of a New Building Block for Imino Sugars,” European Journal of Organic Chemistry 2003 (2003): 1104–1110, 10.1002/ejoc.200390163. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Koulocheri S. D., Pitsinos E. N., and Haroutounian S. A., “An Expedient Asymmetric Synthesis of A Calystegine B4 Analogue,” Synthesis 2002 (2002): 1707–1710. [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Paulsen H. and Todt K., “Monosaccharide mit Stickstoffhaltigem Ring, IX. Darstellung von 1.6‐Anhydro‐Aldohexosen mit Stickstoffhaltigen Ringen,” Chemische Berichte 99 (1966): 3450–3460, 10.1002/cber.19660991111. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. García‐Moreno M. L., Benito J. M., Ortiz Mellet C., and García Fernández J. M., “Synthesis and Evaluation of Calystegine B2 Analogues as Glycosidase Inhibitors,” Journal of Organic Chemistry 66 (2001): 7604–7614, 10.1021/jo015639f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Schaller C., Vogel P., and Jäger V., “Total Syntheses of (+)‐ and (−)‐1‐deoxynojirimycin (1,5‐dideoxy‐1,5‐imino‐d‐ and l‐glucitol) and of (+)‐ and (−)‐1‐deoxyidonojirimycin (1,5‐dideoxy‐1,5‐imino‐d‐ and l‐iditol) via Furoisoxazoline‐3‐aldehydes,” Carbohydrate Research 314 (1998): 25–35, 10.1016/S0008-6215(98)00287-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Haukaas M. H. and O'Doherty G. A., “Synthesis of D—and L ‐Deoxymannojirimycin via an Asymmetric Aminohydroxylation of Vinylfuran,” Organic Letters 3 (2001): 401–404, 10.1021/ol006907j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Beacham A. R., Smelt K. H., Biggadike K., et al., “Inhibition of Fucosyl Transferase and Fucosidase by a Rigid Bicyclic Mimic of α‐L‐Fucose,” Tetrahedron Letters 39 (1998): 151–154, 10.1016/S0040-4039(97)10473-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Swamy K. C. K., Kumar N. N. B., Balaraman E., and Pavan Kumar K. V. P., “Mitsunobu and Related Reactions: Advances and Applications,” Chemical Reviews 109 (2009): 2551–2651, 10.1021/cr800278z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Wagener T., Heusler A., Nairoukh Z., Bergander K., Daniliuc C. G., and Glorius F., “Accessing (Multi)Fluorinated Piperidines Using Heterogeneous Hydrogenation,” ACS Catalysis 10 (2020): 12052–12057, 10.1021/acscatal.0c03278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Devaraj N. K. and Finn M. G., “Introduction: Click Chemistry,” Chemical Reviews 121 (2021): 6697–6698, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Schneider M. J., “Pyridine and Piperidine Alkaloids: An update,” in Alkaloids: Chemical and Biochemical Perspectives, ed. Pelletier S. W., (Oxford, 1996), 155–299. [Google Scholar]
  • 45. For Sake of Clarity, we Used the Carbohydrate Nomenclature and not the Piperidine Nomenclature.
  • 46. Karban J., Císařová I., Strašák T., Šťastná L. Č., and Sýkora J., “Skeletal Rearrangements Resulting From Reactions of 1,6:2,3‐ and 1,6:3,4‐dianhydro‐β‐ d ‐hexopyranoses With Diethylaminosulphur Trifluoride,” Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry 10 (2012): 394–403, 10.1039/C1OB06336G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Quiquempoix L., Wang Z., Graton J., et al., “Synthesis of 2,3,4‐Trideoxy‐2,3,4‐trifluoroglucose,” Journal of Organic Chemistry 84 (2019): 5899–5906, 10.1021/acs.joc.9b00310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Nakamura H., Arata K., Wakamatsu T., Ban Y., and Shibasaki M., “Alkylated Levoglucosan in Organic Synthesis. A Formal Total Synthesis of Elaiophylin,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 38 (1990): 2435–2441, 10.1248/cpb.38.2435. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.A similar result has been obtained with levoglucosan. See Challenger S. and Procter G., “Anhydro–glucopyranose Is Organic Synthesis; Preparation of a Fragment for a Synthesis of Rosaramycin,” Tetrahedron Letters 1986, 27, 391–394, 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)84027-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Bailliez V., Olesker A., and Cleophax J., “Synthesis of Polynitrogenated Analogues of Glucopyranoses From levoglucosan,” Tetrahedron 60 (2004): 1079–1085, 10.1016/j.tet.2003.11.080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Compain P. and Martin O., Iminosugars From Synthesis to Therapeutic Applications (Wiley, 2007), 10.1002/9780470517437. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Horne G. and Wilson F. X., “Therapeutic Applications of Iminosugars: Current Perspectives and Future Opportunities,” Progress in Medicinal Chemistry 50 (2011): 135–176, 10.1016/B978-0-12-381290-2.00004-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Bates R. W., Lu Y., and Cai M. P., “Ring Opening of Cyclic N,O‐Acetals With Allyltrimethylsilane Under Lewis Acidic Conditions,” Tetrahedron 65 (2009): 7852–7858, 10.1016/j.tet.2009.07.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Muthusamy S., Krishnamurthi J., and Suresh E., “Highly Regio‐ and Chemoselective Ring Opening of Oxa‐Bridged Piperidinones Toward Functionalized Furanones and Piperidines,” Organic Letters 8 (2006): 5101–5104, 10.1021/ol0620038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Ayala L., Lucero C. G., Romero J. A. C., Tabacco S. A., and Woerpel K. A., “Stereochemistry of Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions Depending Upon Substituent:  Evidence for Electrostatic Stabilization of Pseudoaxial Conformers of Oxocarbenium Ions by Heteroatom Substituents,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 125 (2003): 15521–15528, 10.1021/ja037935a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. El‐Araby A. M., Fisher J. F., and Mobashery S., “Bacterial Peptidoglycan as a Living Polymer,” Chemistry & Biology 84 (2025): 102562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Chattopadhyay A. K., Ly V. L., Jakkepally S., Berger G., and Hanessian S., “Total Synthesis of Isodaphlongamine H: A Possible Biogenetic Conundrum,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 55 (2016): 2577–2581, 10.1002/anie.201510861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting File 1: chem71491‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx

CHEM-32-e71491-s001.docx (9.4MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the Supporting Information of this article.


Articles from Chemistry (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES