Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1991 May;41(346):184–187.

Longer booking intervals in general practice: effects on doctors' stress and arousal.

A Wilson 1, P McDonald 1, L Hayes 1, J Cooney 1
PMCID: PMC1371652  PMID: 1878267

Abstract

A controlled trial was carried out to determine whether longer booking intervals at surgeries affected general practitioners' self-assessed levels of stress and arousal. Sixteen general practitioners from 10 practices took part. Surgery sessions with patients booked at 10 minute intervals (experimental sessions) were compared with the doctors' usual booking intervals of between 7.5 and 5.0 minutes (control sessions). Stress and arousal were assessed by the general practitioner before and after each surgery session using a mood adjective check list. The study included 109 experimental and 184 control sessions. The median consultation length increased from six minutes in the control sessions to seven minutes in the experimental sessions. At the end of the experimental sessions, stress scores were lower, and arousal scores higher than at the end of the control sessions (P less than 0.001). There were no significant differences between experimental and control sessions in stress or arousal at the start of the sessions. Favourable mood changes were seen more consistently in the experimental sessions than control sessions, with less than a quarter of doctors showing increased stress or decreased arousal after sessions relative to before. It is concluded that longer booking intervals are of psychological advantage to general practitioners.

Full text

PDF
184

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hill-Smith I. Mathematical relationship between waiting times and appointment interval for doctor and patients. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Dec;39(329):492–494. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. King M. G., Burrows G. D., Stanley G. V. Measurement of stress and arousal: validation of the stress/arousal adjective checklist. Br J Psychol. 1983 Nov;74(Pt 4):473–479. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1983.tb01880.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lowenthal L., Bingham E. Length of consultation: how well do patient's choose? J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Nov;37(304):498–499. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mackay C., Cox T., Burrows G., Lazzerini T. An inventory for the measurement of self-reported stress and arousal. Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1978 Sep;17(3):283–284. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1978.tb00280.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Makin P. J., Rout U., Cooper C. L. Job satisfaction and occupational stress among general practitioners--a pilot study. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988 Jul;38(312):303–306. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mechanic D. General medical practice in England and Wales. Its organization and future. N Engl J Med. 1968 Sep 26;279(13):680–689. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196809262791305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Morrell D. C., Evans M. E., Morris R. W., Roland M. O. The "five minute" consultation: effect of time constraint on clinical content and patient satisfaction. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Mar 29;292(6524):870–873. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6524.870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Morrell D. C., Roland M. O. How can good general practitioner care be achieved? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Jan 17;294(6565):161–162. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6565.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Murray R. M. Alcoholism amongst male doctors in Scotland. Lancet. 1976 Oct 2;2(7988):729–731. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)90021-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. RUSSEK H. I., ZOHMAN B. L. Relative significance of heredity, diet and occupational stress in coronary heart disease of young adults; based on an analysis of 100 patients between the ages of 25 and 40 years and a similar group of 100 normal control subjects. Am J Med Sci. 1958 Mar;235(3):266–277. doi: 10.1097/00000441-195803000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rankin H. J., Serieys N. M., Elliott-Binns C. P. Determinants of mood in general practitioners. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Mar 7;294(6572):618–620. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6572.618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Review body prices new staff grade. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Feb 20;296(6621):585–586. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ridsdale L., Carruthers M., Morris R., Ridsdale J. Study of the effect of time availability on the consultation. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Dec;39(329):488–491. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Roland M. O., Bartholomew J., Courtenay M. J., Morris R. W., Morrell D. C. The "five minute" consultation: effect of time constraint on verbal communication. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Mar 29;292(6524):874–876. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6524.874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Thayer R. E. Measurement of activation through self-report. Psychol Rep. 1967 Apr;20(2):663–678. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1967.20.2.663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wilson A. D. Consultation length: general practitioners' attitudes and practices. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 May 4;290(6478):1322–1324. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6478.1322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES