Abstract
This is a comprehensive review on the progress of laser photocoagulation therapy in the treatment of pediatric retinal diseases. The review begins by introducing the background and characteristics of pediatric retinal diseases, as well as the principles and mechanisms of retinal photocoagulation currently employed in clinical practice. Subsequently, the paper elaborates on the application of laser photocoagulation therapy in pediatric retinal diseases such as Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP), Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy (FEVR), Coats' disease, Norrie disease, Incontinentia Pigmenti (IP), Morning Glory Syndrome (MGS), and Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP). Laser therapy has shown significant efficacy in slowing disease progression, improving visual function, and preventing severe complications. However, laser therapy also carries potential complications that require careful control of laser parameters during treatment. With advancements in technology and further clinical research, our understanding of the application of laser therapy in pediatric retinal diseases has deepened, but further research is needed to refine treatment protocols and enhance treatment effectiveness.
Keywords: Laser photocoagulation, Pediatric retinal diseases, Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR), Coats’ disease
Introduction
Pediatric retinal diseases refer to a group of diseases that affect the structure and function of the retina in the pediatric population, including common retinal lesions and complex genetic and congenital developmental abnormalities. Pediatric retinal diseases often have insidious onset and diverse manifestations of lesions. Due to the special anatomical structure of the pediatric retina during growth and development, as well as differences in the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and outcomes of pediatric retinal diseases compared to those in adults, treatment principles for adult retinal diseases may not always be applicable to pediatric retinal diseases. In recent years, with deepening understanding of pediatric retinal diseases and updates in treatment techniques, the treatment efficacy of this category of diseases has also improved to a certain extent [1, 2]. Currently, the main treatment methods for pediatric retinal diseases include retinal cryotherapy, laser photocoagulation, intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs, vitreoretinal surgery, as well as Sub-Tenon and intravitreal steroid injections [3].
Among these, laser photocoagulation therapy, as a commonly used clinical treatment modality, has been widely studied for its application in various pediatric retinal diseases. This review aims to introduce the current progress of laser photocoagulation therapy in the treatment of pediatric retinal diseases.
Mechanism of retinal photocoagulation
Currently, there are various types of lasers used in clinical retinal photocoagulation procedures, including multi-wavelength krypton laser, 532 nm laser, argon laser, and 810 nm diode lasers. In pediatric retinal disease treatment, green (532 nm) and Infrared (810 nm) lasers are commonly employed due to their specific absorption characteristics and therapeutic advantages. The principles and effects of retinal photocoagulation therapy discovered so far include the following:
Retinal photocoagulation targets the ischemic regions of the retina to modulate the pathological production of VEGF, thereby preventing the progression of neovascularization and associated complications [4].
Retinal photocoagulation may compromise the external barrier capacity of the patient’s retinal pigment epithelium(RPE), leading to the dispersion of nutrients from the choroid to the retina, significantly altering the retinal nutritional status [5].
Retinal photocoagulation gradually reduces the oxygen consumption of the retina, directly damaging high-oxygen-consuming receptors, thereby transforming them into low-oxygen-consuming glial substances, providing oxygen support to residual tissues, significantly improving the patient’s blood circulation, and reducing leakage [6].
Retinal photocoagulation applies targeted laser energy to the retina, which can lead to alterations in the choroid and retinal barriers of the patient’s RPE cells. This process facilitates the transfer and absorption of fluid from the RPE to the choroidal capillaries, thereby modulating the microenvironment and potentially reducing fluid leakage [7].
Retinal photocoagulation has the effect of controlling the expansion of capillaries and microaneurysms, reducing vascular permeability, and effectively alleviating retinal edema [8–10].
nm Green laser (frequency-doubled Nd: YAG )
This wavelength is preferentially absorbed by hemoglobin and the RPE. Its high precision allows for targeted ablation of abnormal vessels while minimizing damage to the surrounding neural retina [11].
nm infrared laser
This laser penetrates deeply and is primarily absorbed by melanin in the RPE and choroid. It is suitable for treating deep-seated retinal pathologies. Its ability to traverse turbid media enables effective treatment of subretinal vascular leakage. However, the higher energy required for deep tissue ablation increases the risk of choroidal thermal injury [12].
Retinopathy of prematurity
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) is an eye disease that affects premature newborns, especially those with extremely low birth weights. Its occurrence is closely linked to the degree of prematurity and the postnatal oxygen environment. Infants weighing less than 1500 g or born before 32 weeks’ gestation are most susceptible to ROP [13]. The global incidence of ROP is correlated with the rate of premature births, with variations observed due to differences in medical conditions, neonatal care, and monitoring levels among countries and regions [14, 15]. The disease typically emerges within weeks after premature birth, characterized by abnormal growth of retinal blood vessels, which can lead to retinal lesions, traction, and, in severe cases, blindness due to retinal detachment [14].
The International Committee for Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity (ICROP) established diagnostic criteria for ROP in 1984, which have since been updated to the third edition. ROP classification is based on the zone, severity (stage), and vascular characteristics in the posterior pole (normal, pre-plus, or plus disease). Disease progression is divided into five stages, from initial demarcation lines in stage one to complete retinal detachment in stage five, as shown in Table 1 [16].
Table 1.
Stages of ROP
| Stage | Clinical Features |
|---|---|
| 1 | Demarcation Line: A thin and flat line on the retinal plane marking the boundary between the anteriorly located avascular retina and the posterior vascularized retina. |
| 2 | Ridge: An elevation from the demarcation line which possesses height and width and extends above the plane of the retina. |
| 3 | Extraretinal Fibrovascular Proliferation: Neovascularization that extends from the ridge into the vitreous cavity or is intravitreal. |
|
4 4 A 4B |
Partial Retinal Detachment Extrafoveal detachment Foveal detachment |
| 5 | Total Retinal Detachment |
| 5 A | Total retinal detachment is present, but the optic disc is still visible, indicating an “open-funnel” configuration. |
| 5B | The optic disc is not visible due to the presence of retrolental fibrous tissue, indicating a “closed-funnel” configuration. |
| 5 C | Characterized by the features of stage 5B with additional anterior segment abnormalities such as significant anterior chamber shallowing, irido-corneal-lenticular adhesions, and central corneal opacification, also suggesting a “closed-funnel” configuration. |
Laser therapy, one of several management options for ROP, is primarily aimed at preventing abnormal blood vessel growth and reducing the risk of retinal detachment (Fig. 1). It is commonly performed through retinal photocoagulation when abnormal blood vessel proliferation is detected during ROP examination. This treatment targets the peripheral non-perfused areas of the retina to curb neovascularization proliferation [17, 18].
Fig. 1.

Changes in ROP following laser photocoagulation therapy
(1 A: Pre-Laser Treatment;1B: Post-Laser Treatment)
Laser photocoagulation has revolutionized the management of ROP, with multiple wavelengths offering distinct clinical advantages. The 810 nm infrared diode laser serves as the gold standard, employing typical parameters of 150–250 mW power, 100–200 ms pulse duration, 500 μm spot size, and repeat mode to deliver 2,000–3,000 near-confluent spots to the ora serrata in zone II disease, achieving 98.3% complete regression with minimal complications [19]. While its portability aids bedside use, visible wavelengths enhance burn visualization for precision. The 532 nm frequency-doubled Nd: YAG green laser excels in oxyhemoglobin absorption, using 100–300 mW power and 200 ms pulse duration with similar spot configurations. It yields 92.5% favorable outcomes across ROP subtypes, including aggressive ROP (A-ROP) and eyes with tunica vasculosa lentis (43.8% of cases), without elevated cataract or hyphema risks; comparative data show equivalent regression to diode laser but potentially fewer anterior segment complications [20, 21]. The 577 nm yellow solid-state laser aligns with oxyhemoglobin’s peak absorption while minimizing xanthophyll absorption for macular safety, employing 70–100 mW power (mean 88 mW), 100–200 ms exposure (mean 130 ms), and approximately 890 burns per eye. In subthreshold micropulse mode with 5–15% duty cycles and 50% threshold power, a pilot study of 30 eyes reported 100% regression at 3 months with no complications [22]. In contrast, the argon laser (488–528 nm blue-green) pioneered ROP treatment but was superseded due to higher complication rates, including 12% cataracts (median onset 13 weeks) and anterior segment ischemia like hyphema and iris atrophy. Despite approximately 2,500 burns per eye and ~ 73% favorable outcomes, long-term results showed 71.4% favorable visual acuity but high rates of myopia [11]. In summary, wavelength selection balances efficacy—with all modern lasers superior to argon and cryotherapy—and safety profiles: diode laser for tissue penetration, and green and yellow lasers for enhanced visualization and reduced collateral damage. The choice should be guided by disease zone, media clarity, and local availability [21].
Studies from the 1990s, including one from 1994, have shown that photocoagulation for ROP is as effective as or more effective than cryotherapy, with less associated pain and inflammation [23]. However, with the evolution of ROP classification into Type I and Type 2, the modern approach favors anti-VEGF treatments as the primary intervention, reserving laser therapy for specific cases or in combination with anti-VEGF agents. A 10-year follow-up study indicates that laser photocoagulation therapy results in better visual acuity and fewer refractive errors than cryotherapy [24], establishing it as the standard treatment for ROP. Despite its efficacy, laser therapy carries the risk of tissue damage, which can lead to permanent visual field defects and myopia [25].
Since 2007, anti-VEGF drugs have been used in the treatment of ROP. Initial studies in ROP with therapeutic indications show that combining laser photocoagulation with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections yields favorable outcomes [26], with a 90.2% efficacy rate when bevacizumab or ranibizumab is used with laser therapy [27]. However, meta-analyses comparing laser therapy with anti-VEGF therapy for Type-1 ROP have not definitively concluded the superiority of either treatment method in terms of efficacy, although laser therapy may cause more eye complications and increase the risk of myopia [28, 29]. In Zone II Stage 2 or 3 ROP with plus disease, a single intravitreal injection of ranibizumab can promote ROP regression and peripheral retinal vascularization, but a significant proportion of children experience ROP recurrence afterward [30].
In the treatment of A-ROP, some researchers advocate for the combined use of laser therapy and anti-VEGF to achieve disease control [31]. However, issues with application of anti-VEGF, such as peripheral retinal vascularization, disease reactivation, and systemic drug absorption, have been noted [32]. Consequently, other researchers prefer laser therapy as the primary treatment for A-ROP, citing its one-time treatment advantage, which avoids potential anti-VEGF side effects and the long-term presence of avascular retina [33].
Different stages and zones of ROP respond variably to retinal photocoagulation therapy and anti-VEGF agents [34]. Laser therapy sessions are typically less frequent than intravitreal anti-VEGF injections, suggesting that laser therapy provides longer-lasting inhibition of neovascularization. Different stages and zones of ROP respond variably to retinal photocoagulation therapy and anti-VEGF agents [34]. Laser therapy sessions are typically less frequent than intravitreal anti-VEGF injections, suggesting that laser therapy provides longer-lasting inhibition of neovascularization.
Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy
Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR) is a rare hereditary eye disease with an unclear incidence rate. Its characteristics include avascular zones in the retina, neovascularization, tractional retinal detachment, and exudation. This condition typically occurs in full-term infants without a history of oxygen exposure but may also affect preterm infants, with clinical manifestations similar to ROP [35]. In addition, the two diseases share some genetic similarities, particularly in genes such as LRP5, FZD4, TSPAN12, and NDP, which are involved in the Wnt signaling pathway and play a crucial role in retinal vascular development [36]. The progression of FEVR can be divided into five clinical stages (Stage 1: Peripheral avascularity (lack of blood vessel development) without extraretinal neovascularization or exudates. Stage 2: Peripheral avascularity with extraretinal neovascularization. Stage 3: Extraretinal neovascularization with or without exudates, and without retinal detachment. Stage 4: Partial retinal detachment involving the peripheral retina but not the central macula. Stage 5: Total retinal detachment), progressing from peripheral retinal avascularity to complete retinal detachment [37]. Wide-field fluorescein angiography is crucial for early diagnosis of FEVR, aiding in timely treatment and determining the disease status of asymptomatic family members. In 2014, Kashani et al. proposed a clinical staging method for FEVR based on clinical presentations and angiography results (As shown in Table 2) [38].
Table 2.
Revised FEVR clinical staging system2014
| Stage | Clinical Features | |
|---|---|---|
|
1 2 A 2B |
Avascular periphery or anomalous intraretinal vascularization Without exudate or leakage With exudate or leakage |
|
| 2 | Avascular retinal periphery with extraretinal vascularization | |
| 2 A | Without exudate or leakage | |
| 2B | With exudate or leakage | |
| 3 | Extramacular retinal detachment | |
| 3 A | Without exudate or leakage | |
| 3B | With exudate or leakage | |
|
4 4 A 4B |
Macula-involving retinal detachment, subtotal Without exudate or leakage With exudate or leakage |
|
|
5 5 A 5B |
Total retinal detachment Open funnel Closed funnel |
|
(2 A: Pre-Laser Treatment; 2B: Post-Laser Treatment; 2 C: 1 Week After Laser Treatment; 2D: 1 Month After Laser Treatment)
Currently, the treatment of FEVR mainly includes laser photocoagulation therapy and vitreoretinal surgery. Laser therapy is primarily used in the early stages of neovascularization in avascular areas to reduce further disease progression and prevent retinal detachment (Fig. 2). The selection of laser modalities and parameters depends on the disease stage and anatomical involvement: For early-stage lesions confined to the peripheral retina, the 532 nm green laser is preferred due to its selective absorption by hemoglobin and RPE, enabling precise photocoagulation of superficial abnormal vessels with typical energy settings of 100–300 mW, exposure times of 0.1–0.2 s, and spot sizes of 200–500 μm. In contrast, advanced cases with deep retinal or choroidal involvement, or those complicated by vitreous hemorrhage, require the 810 nm infrared diode laser, which penetrates turbid media and targets melanin-rich deeper layers to ablate subretinal pathologies. For these cases, energy settings of 200–400 mW, exposure times of 0.2–0.4 s, and spot sizes of 200–500 μm are typically employed, with careful titration to achieve a gray-white endpoint indicating appropriate RPE and choroidal response. Near the macula, smaller spot sizes (100–200 μm) may be used cautiously to minimize collateral damage [39]. By selectively targeting and modifying abnormal neovascularization within the lesion area, laser therapy reduces exudation and mitigates secondary retinal traction, thereby preserving central vision [40, 41]. Furthermore, laser therapy can be synergistically integrated with anti-VEGF therapy to enhance suppression of pathologic angiogenesis and reduce post-procedural hemorrhage risks [42].
Fig. 2.

Changes in FEVR following laser photocoagulation therapy
However, laser therapy is not suitable for all FEVR patients, and its indications depend on the extent, location, and severity of the lesions in individual patients [40]. In the management of familial diseases, prophylactic retinal photocoagulation in some FEVR patients can maintain stable vision [41]. Kashani et al. suggest that laser therapy should be conducted early at sites exhibiting leakage or within areas of the retina that are not fully vascularized because FEVR may progress linearly or skip certain stages. However, even with treatment, lesions at the vitreoretinal interface can still evolve into tractional retinal detachment, which can result in vitreous hemorrhage or retinal detachment [38]. The advantage of laser therapy lies in its non-invasiveness and precision, but it may not be effective enough for patients with existing retinal detachment or extensive exudation. Therefore, laser therapy, as an important tool in the treatment of FEVR, requires personalized treatment based on the patient’s progression.
Coats’ disease
Coats’ disease is a primary retinal vascular disorder characterized by retinal telangiectasia, exudation, and exudative retinal detachment. In 1908, George Coats first described a series of patients presenting with retinal telangiectasia accompanied by extensive intraretinal and subretinal exudation. Despite the continuous progress in the diagnosis and treatment of Coats’ disease over the past century, its exact underlying etiology remains unknown [43]. Coats’ disease is generally considered non-familial and usually unrelated to systemic diseases. Due to its frequent occurrence in infancy, it is believed to be a congenital condition and is common in young males. Shields et al. conducted a consecutive clinical observation of 150 cases of Coats’ disease in 2001 and proposed a staging system for Coats’ disease, which is widely used today, as shown in Table 3 [44].
Table 3.
Coats shields’ classification
| Stage | Clinical Features |
|---|---|
| 1 | Retinal telangiectasia only |
| 2 | Telangiectasia and exudation |
| 2 A | Extrafoveal exudation |
| 2B | Foveal exudation |
| 3 | Exudative retinal detachment |
| 3 A | Subtotal detachment (1) Extrafoveal (2) Foveal |
| 3B | Total retinal detachment |
| 4 | Total retinal detachment and glaucoma |
| 5 | Advanced end-stage disease |
(3 A: Pre-Laser Treatment; 3B: Post-Laser Treatment)
Vascular leakage is the main cause of vision loss in Coats’ disease, so the primary goal of treatment for this condition is to destroy abnormal vessels and aneurysmal dilatations. The first successful treatment of Coats’ disease was achieved through transscleral diathermy, followed by retinal laser photocoagulation becoming the mainstay of treatment in clinical practice [43].
Laser photocoagulation therapy is suitable for Coats’ disease, whether it is in the early stages with exudation but without retinal detachment or shallow retinal detachment, or in the advanced stages [44] (Fig. 3). Studies have shown that green laser (532 nm) can effectively treat both early and advanced Coats’ disease, including cases with significant retinal detachment [45]. For cases where retinal photocoagulation is ineffective due to dense exudates, cryotherapy may be considered [46]. Due to the slow resolution of exudation, multiple laser treatments are often needed, with a recommended interval of at least 3 months between two laser sessions [44].
Fig. 3.

Changes in coats’ disease following laser photocoagulation therapy
Laser photocoagulation serves as the cornerstone treatment for Coats disease, with distinct laser types offering unique characteristics. Argon laser emits 514.5–532 nm green light, primarily absorbed by RPE melanin and hemoglobin, with treatment parameters including power ranging from 150 to 200 mJ to 400-800mW, spot sizes of 100–500 μm, and exposure times of 0.1–0.2 s [47, 48], demonstrating efficacy in early-stage Coats disease, though limited by thermal damage diffusion to adjacent healthy tissue and energy blockage by subretinal fluid [49]. Diode laser (810 nm near-infrared) offers superior penetration through blood and macular pigment, primarily absorbed by RPE and choroidal melanin, utilizing parameters of 1000mW power, 300msec pulse duration, and 75–125 μm spots in diabetic studies [50], but lacking dedicated clinical research and optimal parameter validation for Coats disease. The 577 nm yellow laser coincides with oxyhemoglobin absorption peak while being efficiently absorbed by melanin but minimally by xanthophyll, providing a wider therapeutic window than 532 nm green laser with higher operational tolerance, minimizing neural epithelial damage when treating near-macular lesions, with clinical applications averaging approximately 400 photocoagulation spots per session [51], though large-scale prospective studies remain insufficient. Subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) employs 5%-15% duty cycles to fragment continuous laser beams into microsecond pulses, achieving therapeutic effects through biostimulation rather than destructive coagulation while avoiding permanent structural damage, with case reports demonstrating safety and efficacy for macular-involved Coats disease [52], however current evidence remains low-grade, lacking randomized controlled trials to validate optimal treatment protocols and long-term outcomes.
When combined with other medications during retinal photocoagulation: intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide can be used as adjunctive therapy, leading to reduced central retinal thickness, resolution of exudates, and possible improvement in vision. However, the use of steroids can lead to complications such as cataracts and glaucoma [53]. Limited case reports and clinical studies have shown that adjunctive anti-VEGF therapy helps with the regression of abnormal vessels, resolution of macular edema, and stabilization or improvement of exudates [43]. However, since VEGF is not a key factor in the pathogenesis of Coats’ disease, anti-VEGF therapy can only assist in treatment and cannot treat Coats’ disease itself [54].
Studies have shown that the visual prognosis of patients with Coats’ disease has improved in recent years, possibly due to early detection and aggressive treatment [55]. Improvements in techniques such as retinal laser photocoagulation, retinal repositioning surgery, and intraocular injections have contributed to the treatment and management of Coats’ disease.
Norrie disease
Norrie disease is a rare genetic disorder that primarily affects the retina and typically leads to blindness. Ocular manifestations include leukocoria, posterior lens fibrous tissue proliferation, severe retinal dysplasia, and retinal detachment. Norrie disease patients often experience blindness (no light perception) due to bilateral retinal detachment shortly after birth or within the first few months of life, with additional systemic symptoms such as hearing impairment, neurological disorders, and peripheral vascular diseases being possible. Due to its X-linked recessive inheritance, this disease almost exclusively affects male infants, although there have been a few reports suggesting that female patients may exhibit milder disease features [56–58].
Currently, there is no established standard treatment protocol for Norrie disease. Reports have indicated that retinal laser photocoagulation surgery and vitrectomy are effective in some cases. Because Norrie disease patients have incomplete development of deep retinal capillaries and large areas of avascular retina, leading to continuous neovascularization, laser photocoagulation in the early stages of Norrie disease fibrosis may help slow disease progression [59].
In treatment reports of diagnosed Norrie disease patients, Chow et al. reported the first case of laser photocoagulation of the avascular retina in a newborn delivered at 37 weeks of gestation in 2010. The patient was diagnosed with Norrie disease on the first day of life and subsequently underwent laser photocoagulation of both eyes’ avascular retina. One month after treatment, the fibrous vascular proliferation outside the retina completely regressed, and there was no retinal detachment at the 24-month follow-up [60]. In 2014, Sisk et al. reported the first case of medically induced preterm birth after identifying a pathogenic NDP gene mutation via amniocentesis. The patient underwent retinal photocoagulation treatment postnatally, leading to regression of neovascularization and absorption of hemorrhage [61]. These two cases suggest that laser ablation of the avascular retina in Norrie disease eyes before correcting for gestational age at 40 weeks may be beneficial for the visual prognosis of affected infants.
It is worth mentioning that in studies investigating the efficacy of intravitreal anti-VEGF injection combined with retinal photocoagulation, research suggests that combination therapy does not have significant clinical benefits in preventing tractional retinal detachment and inhibiting neovascularization [59].
Given the rapid progression of ocular manifestations in Norrie disease, planned preterm delivery after prenatal genetic testing identifies an NDP mutation and prompt retinal photocoagulation of the ischemic retina during the vascular active phase after Norrie disease diagnosis appears to be a reasonable management approach. Timely retinal photocoagulation may aid in neovascular regression and prevention of tractional retinal detachment (TRD), although the optimal laser dosage and the need for repeat and supplemental laser therapy remain undetermined. However, the long-term outcomes of early retinal photocoagulation treatment for Norrie disease are still unknown, and the mechanisms underlying adverse complications such as high myopia, high astigmatism, and posterior staphyloma during follow-up remain unclear [61]. Therefore, until pioneering treatment modalities emerge, retinal laser photocoagulation remains the primary treatment modality for Norrie disease.
Incontinentia pigmenti
Incontinentia pigmenti (IP), also known as Bloch-Sulzberger syndrome, is a rare X-linked dominant genetic syndrome that manifests at birth or during infancy. The main clinical feature of this disease is the appearance of characteristic progressive skin lesions, initially presenting as vesicular lesions, which then progress to swirling pigmentary lesions in the fourth stage. IP has an incidence rate of 0.0025%, predominantly affecting females. 36.5% of IP patients exhibit detectable ocular pathological changes, among which 60%-90% have retinal issues. Peripheral retinal avascularity and macular occlusive diseases are more common [62, 63]. Retinal lesions stem from vascular occlusion, including neovascularization, hemorrhage, absence of the central fovea, optic nerve atrophy, congestion, and tractional retinal detachment. Pathological changes in the central nervous system, teeth, and hair are also common in IP. The diagnosis of this disease is mainly based on the child’s symptoms, ophthalmic examination, and genetic testing. Currently, there is no cure for IP, and treatment is limited to symptom control [64].
The treatment of ischemic retinal lesions in IP is similar to that of ROP. Studies suggest performing retinal laser photocoagulation or cryotherapy in the avascular peripheral retina [65] (Fig. 4). In a long-term follow-up study of 14 IP patients who underwent prophylactic ablation, one case of retinal detachment occurred. Due to the lack of high-quality controlled clinical trials for evaluation, the indications and success rates of prophylactic ablation remain uncertain [66]. Therefore, IP patients should undergo frequent ophthalmic examinations in infancy and early childhood to initiate treatment promptly when the disease progresses.
Fig. 4.

Changes in ip following laser photocoagulation therapy
(4 A: Pre-Laser Treatment; 4B: Post-Laser Treatment; 4 C: 1 Month After Laser Treatment)
Morning glory syndrome
Morning glory syndrome (MGS) is a rare congenital anomaly of the optic disc, typically unilateral, severely affecting the visual acuity of affected children. The hallmark feature of MGS is an enlarged funnel-shaped optic disc with peripapillary choroidal retinal pigment disturbances, radial retinal vessels, and central glial tuft resembling the appearance of a morning glory flower [67]. The incidence rate of MGS is approximately 2.6 per 100,000 individuals, often associated with peripapillary or macular edema, brain developmental abnormalities, and/or cutaneous vascular malformations [68]. The exact etiology of MGS remains unclear. Previous studies have suggested associations between MGS and developmental anomalies of the posterior sclera and lamina cribrosa during embryogenesis [69], craniofacial abnormalities [70], multiple sclerosis [71], chronic myeloid leukemia-Philadelphia chromosome [72], and other diseases.
Additionally, MGS often presents with other severe ocular conditions, including cataracts, secondary glaucoma, corneal leukoma, strabismus, nystagmus, and retinal detachment (RD) [73]. Approximately one-third of MGS patients may develop RD, primarily due to migration of cerebrospinal or vitreous fluid into the subretinal space and traction on the preretinal glial tissue [74–76]. Surgical treatment for late-stage MGS complicated by RD is challenging and associated with poor visual prognosis, with no definitive effective treatment regimen established [77–80].
In recent years, juxtapapillary laser photocoagulation (JLP) has emerged as a standard treatment for Cavitary Optic Disc [81] (Fig. 5). The mechanism of JLP involves creating adhesions between the RPE, neuroepithelium, and choroid through thermal effects, forming a barrier that prevents fluid migration into the retina, thus reducing the incidence of RD [76]. However, JLP treatment remains controversial due to the risk of macular bundle (PMB) damage induced by laser, which may lead to vision loss. Recent studies have indicated that laser in the PMB region does not result in loss of visual function [82]. Nieraj Jain and Mark W Johnson advocate for vitrectomy and gas tamponade after JLP to create a permanent intra- and subretinal fluid barrier, ensuring safety [76]. A retrospective study on Cavitary Optic Disc revealed that JLP combined with vitrectomy and gas tamponade safely prevents fluid migration caused by cavitary optic disc anomalies, promoting resolution of macular edema and long-term prevention of recurrent macular lesions [81]. However, a multicenter retrospective study by the King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital (KKESH) International Retina Collaborative Research Group found no significant functional and anatomical benefits from combining pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with JLP in treating MGS macular lesions compared to PPV alone [83].
Fig. 5.

Changes in MGS following laser photocoagulation therapy
(5 A: Pre-Laser Treatment; 5B: Post-Laser Treatment; 5 C: 1 Week After Laser Treatment; 5D: 1 Month After Laser Treatment)
A single-center retrospective study from China proposed that early prophylactic juxtapapillary laser photocoagulation (Prophylactic JLP) may improve anatomical structure and visual prognosis in MGS. The study retrospectively analyzed 22 MGS patients aged 0–15 years who underwent prophylactic JLP, observing no significant RD in the short-term follow-up, with over 50% of patients experiencing improved visual acuity. However, the prophylactic use of JLP requires further long-term clinical observation to confirm its efficacy and safety [84].
In conclusion, JLP is an effective means to prevent subretinal fluid migration in MGS, but further high-quality clinical research evidence is needed to comprehensively understand the effects of JLP on ocular anatomy and visual prognosis in children with MGS. Future research directions may include improving laser treatment techniques, reducing potential complications, and exploring optimal practices for monotherapy and combination therapy.
Retinitis pigmentosa
Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a hereditary disease characterized by a series of genetic mutations leading to gradual loss of photoreceptors, clinically manifested by night blindness, narrowed visual field, central visual impairment, retinal pigment deposition, and photopsia [85]. It typically begins in childhood, but the exact onset time and rate of deterioration vary among individuals. The prevalence of this disease is approximately 1 in 4000 individuals [86]. RP is caused by mutations in many genes, making the pathogenesis difficult to elucidate [87].
Retinal photocoagulation aids in reducing the migration of RPE cells and retinal remnants, as well as improving electroretinography (ERG) findings in RP. In the past clinical treatment of RP, continuous-wave laser photocoagulation has been the classical treatment modality, but it has drawbacks such as choroidal retinal scarring and loss of photoreceptors [88].
With technological advancements, different laser modes can now be applied in RP treatment. Compared to traditional laser modes, subthreshold diode micropulse laser therapy (SDM) selectively modulates the function of RPE cells by targeting the melanosomes, effectively addressing pathological changes within the RPE cells while minimizing the risk of thermal damage to the adjacent retina [89]. Studies have shown that early RP treatment with SDM may slow disease progression and reduce long-term visual loss [90]. However, existing clinical studies mainly focus on adult populations after disease development, and there is a lack of research on the preventive effects of retinal photocoagulation in children with RP.
Other pediatric retinal diseases
In real-world clinical practice, laser therapy has shown efficacy in pathological changes of retinal vasculature caused by genetic diseases, such as retinal vascular tumors in Blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome (BRBNS) [91], retinal detachment in Stickler syndrome [92], retinal vascular tumors in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome [93], retinal capillary dilation in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) [94], exudative vascular lesions in Leber congenital amaurosis [95], and neovascularization in Alström syndrome patients [96].
In the application of laser therapy for retinoblastoma (RB) (Fig. 6), different laser intensities should be used to treat tumors of different sizes, supplemented by other therapies [97].
Fig. 6.

Changes in RB Following Laser Photocoagulation Therapy
(6 A: Pre-Laser Treatment; 6B: Post-Laser Treatment; 6 C: 1 Month After Laser Treatment)
Discussion
Although laser therapy is an established treatment for ROP, its application for other pediatric retinal diseases requires further research and clarification. Internationally, despite extensive clinical research on ROP, there is no unified global guideline for the indications and treatment protocols of laser therapy in pediatric retinal diseases. While the aforementioned guidelines discuss the indications for laser treatment of ROP [16], they do not cover all possible pediatric retinal conditions. To address this gap, the selection of laser modalities and parameters must be tailored to the specific pathophysiology of each disease. For example, the 532 nm green laser (e.g., frequency-doubled Nd: YAG ) targets hemoglobin and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), making it ideal for superficial vascular pathologies such as ROP and retinal hemangiomas, with typical settings of 100–300 mW energy and 0.1-0.2-second pulses. In contrast, the 810 nm infrared diode laser penetrates deeper into melanin-rich choroidal layers, enabling closure of subretinal leakage in Coats disease at higher energies (400–600 mW), albeit requiring staged treatment to avoid retinal detachment. Laser parameter optimization must also account for anatomical vulnerabilities: macular lesions demand smaller spot sizes (100–200 μm) and reduced energy (50–150 mW) to preserve central vision, while emerging techniques like 577 nm micropulse laser (300–600 mW/cm², 200 µs pulses) offer subthreshold therapy to minimize scar formation in early-stage diseases.
To systematically compare the therapeutic effects and parameter characteristics of different laser modalities across various pediatric retinal diseases, we present a comprehensive comparison table below. This table synthesizes current evidence while highlighting critical knowledge gaps that require future investigation (Table 4).
Table 4.
Comparison of laser types and applications in photocoagulation
| Laser Type | Wavelength(nm) | Power (W) | Application | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Argon Laser | 488/514 | 100–800 | ROP, FEVR, Coats Disease | High penetration, widely used in ophthalmology | Risk of inner retinal damage, limited in macular diseases |
| Krypton Laser | 568/647.1 | 100–1500 | Coats Disease, subretinal hemorrhage | Better penetration through hemorrhage | Less commonly used, complex equipment |
| 532 nm Nd: YAG | 532 | 100–750 | ROP, FEVR, Coats Disease | High safety for macula, clear coagulation | Limited in severe media opacity |
| 810 nm Diode Laser | 810 | 200–1200 | ROP, especially in infants with media opacity | Strong penetration, portable, bedside use | Delayed coagulation, higher pain perception |
| 577 nm Micropulse Laser | 577 | 100–1500 | DME, CSC (adults) | Sub-threshold, tissue-preserving | Limited evidence in pediatric retinal diseases, no clear endpoint |
| Argon Laser | 488/514 | 100–800 | ROP, FEVR, Coats Disease | High penetration, widely used in ophthalmology | Risk of inner retinal damage, limited in macular diseases |
Due to its effective disease control, retinal laser photocoagulation is considered a long-term treatment option for various pediatric retinal diseases. Even in the era of anti-VEGF intravitreal drugs, factors such as treatment burden, economic benefits, and low long-term follow-up rates for pediatric patients have established the role of retinal laser photocoagulation in pediatric retinal vascular diseases. This individualized approach not only enhances vascular closure rates but also reduces complications like retinal scarring and choroidal ischemia, thereby balancing disease control with functional preservation. Future efforts should prioritize standardized parameter guidelines and explore synergies with anti-VEGF agents or AI-driven protocols to address challenges such as limited long-term data.
As a key technology for the treatment of pediatric retinal diseases, retinal laser photocoagulation requires extensive training to master. Especially when treating newborns and children, it should be performed under conditions of general anesthesia and fully dilated pupils due to their difficulty in cooperation. During the treatment, attention should be paid to whether there are any missed lesion areas, and the laser energy should be adjusted in a timely manner based on retinal response to prevent delays in treatment due to insufficient therapy.
However, complications from retinal laser photocoagulation have always been a challenging issue in clinical practice. The long-term effects of laser scars generated by laser thermal effects on infant retinal development are not yet clear. In subsequent research, the efficacy and safety of different laser settings should be a focal point. This will allow for a better understanding of how to mitigate potential complications while maximizing treatment benefits. For instance, while the 532 nm laser reduces macular damage compared to argon lasers, its energy must be carefully calibrated (100–300 mW) to prevent peripheral visual field loss. Similarly, the 810 nm laser’s deep penetration risks choroidal injury if exceeding 400 mW in prolonged exposures (> 0.4 s). Clinical doctors can only prevent retinal structural damage caused by excessive retinal photocoagulation treatment by precisely controlling the laser treatment intensity during the development of different diseases.
However, it is crucial to acknowledge that for many pediatric retinal conditions, there remains insufficient high-quality evidence to establish definitive laser treatment protocols. Diseases such as Norrie disease, Incontinentia Pigmenti, and Morning Glory syndrome lack comprehensive studies delineating optimal laser parameters, specific disease characteristics, comparative advantages, and potential limitations. This knowledge gap significantly hampers clinical decision-making and underscores the urgent need for systematic research in these areas.
Since there are fewer clinical studies on laser treatment of pediatric retinal diseases compared to adult retinal diseases, the long-term effects of retinal laser photocoagulation on the growth and development of pediatric retinas are not yet clear. Therefore, in subsequent clinical studies, attention should be paid to changes in retinal structure and physiology after laser treatment to better understand the development and outcomes of pediatric retinal diseases, which can contribute to the management of pediatric retinal diseases. Multicenter registries tracking parameters (e.g., wavelength, energy, spot size) and outcomes (e.g., visual acuity, scar progression) are urgently needed to establish evidence-based protocols, particularly for those understudied conditions where current clinical practice relies largely on expert opinion rather than robust scientific evidence.
Conclusion
In conclusion, laser photocoagulation, as an important tool for the treatment of pediatric retinal diseases, demonstrates good disease control effects. However, careful selection of appropriate laser parameters is necessary to ensure maximal therapeutic efficacy while minimizing potential complications. This comprehensive review provides an overview of the application of laser photocoagulation in the treatment of pediatric retinal diseases and discusses treatment strategies for different diseases in detail, providing valuable insights for clinical practice.
Author Contribution
QZ, XC & DG: Conceptualization, writing - original draft. YY, GZ: Investigation, writing - review and editing.GM: Supervision, project administration.
Funding
This work was funded by the Introduction Plan of High-Level Foreign Experts (G2022026027L), Major Program of Medical Science Challenging Plan of Henan province(SBGJ202102190) and Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (826QN0870).
Data Availability
Data availability is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Qing Zhang, Xiaoyan Chai and Di Gong contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Guoming Zhang, Email: zhangguoming@sz-eyes.com.
Gaoen Ma, Email: 15757826611@163.com.
References
- 1.Solebo AL, Teoh L, Rahi J (2017) Epidemiology of blindness in children. Arch Dis Child 102(9):853–857 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Agarwal K, Vinekar A, Chandra P, Padhi TR, Nayak S, Jayanna S et al (2021) Imaging the pediatric retina: An overview. Indian J Ophthalmol 69(4):812–823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cai S, Therattil A, Vajzovic L (2020) Recent developments in pediatric retina. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 31(3):155–160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hattenbach LO, Beck KF, Pfeilschifter J, Koch F, Ohrloff C, Schacke W (2005) Pigment-epithelium-derived factor is upregulated in photocoagulated human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Ophthalmic Res 37(6):341–346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Marshall J (1970) Thermal and mechanical mechanisms in laser damage to the retina. Invest Ophthalmol 9(2):97–115 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vergmann AS, Torp TL, Kawasaki R, Hestoy DH, Wong TY, Peto T et al (2021) Retinal vascular oxygen saturation in response to a less extensive laser treatment in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol 99(7):783–789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Malik KJ, Sampat KM, Mansouri A, Steiner JN, Glaser BM (2015) Low-intensity/high-density subthreshold microPulse diode laser for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 35(3):532–536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Alasil T, Waheed NK (2014) Pan retinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: pattern scan laser versus argon laser. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 25(3):164–170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Preliminary report on effects of photocoagulation therapy (1976) The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Am J Ophthalmol 81(4):383–396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhu Y, Zhang T, Wang K, Xu G, Huang X (2015) Changes in choroidal thickness after panretinal photocoagulation in patients with type 2 diabetes. Retina 35(4):695–703 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dikci S, Demirel S, Fırat PG, Yılmaz T, Ceylan OM, Bağ HGG (2020) Comparison of Nd:YAG laser (532 nm green) vs diode laser (810 nm) photocoagulation in the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity: an evaluation in terms of complications. Lasers Med Sci 35(6):1323–1328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stewart MW (2004) Treatment of an avulsed retinal vessel with infrared diode laser photocoagulation. Am J Ophthalmol 137(4):767–768 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Flynn JT, Bancalari E, Snyder ES, Goldberg RN, Feuer W, Cassady J et al (1992) A cohort study of transcutaneous oxygen tension and the incidence and severity of retinopathy of prematurity. N Engl J Med 326(16):1050–1054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bhatnagar A, Skrehot HC, Bhatt A, Herce H, Weng CY (2023) Epidemiology of Retinopathy of Prematurity in the US From 2003 to 2019. JAMA Ophthalmol 141(5):479–485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hong EH, Shin YU, Cho H (2022) Retinopathy of prematurity: a review of epidemiology and current treatment strategies. Clin Exp Pediatr 65(3):115–126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Molinari A, Weaver D, Jalali S (2017) Classifying retinopathy of prematurity. Community Eye Health 30(99):55–56 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Blencowe H, Lawn JE, Vazquez T, Fielder A, Gilbert C (2013) Preterm-associated visual impairment and estimates of retinopathy of prematurity at regional and global levels for 2010. Pediatr Res 74(Suppl 1Suppl 1):35–49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Houston SK, Wykoff CC, Berrocal AM, Hess DJ, Murray TG (2013) Laser treatment for retinopathy of prematurity. Lasers Med Sci 28(2):683–692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yang B, Lian C, Tian R, Chen Y, Tang S, Xiang H et al (2023) Twelve-year outcomes of bedside laser photocoagulation for severe retinopathy of prematurity. Front Pediatr 11:1189236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Singh SR, Katoch D, Handa S, Kaur S, Moharana B, Dogra M et al (2019) Safety and efficacy of 532 nm frequency-doubled Nd-YAG green laser photocoagulation for treatment of retinopathy of prematurity. Indian J Ophthalmol 67(6):860–865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vyas A, Tiwari S, Subramanyam A (2024) Safety and therapeutic efficacy of 577 nm yellow solid krypton laser for retinopathy of prematurity; A prospective pilot study. Indian J Ophthalmol 72(6):856–859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Christiansen SP, Bradford JD (1995) Cataract in infants treated with argon laser photocoagulation for threshold retinopathy of prematurity. Am J Ophthalmol 119(2):175–180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McNamara JA, Tasman W, Vander JF, Brown GC (1992) Diode laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity. Preliminary results. Arch Ophthalmol 110(12):1714–1716 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Connolly BP, Ng EY, McNamara JA, Regillo CD, Vander JF, Tasman W (2002) A comparison of laser photocoagulation with cryotherapy for threshold retinopathy of prematurity at 10 years: part 2. Refractive outcome. Ophthalmology 109(5):936–941 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tan QQ, Christiansen SP, Wang J (2019) Development of refractive error in children treated for retinopathy of prematurity with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents: A meta-analysis and systematic review. PLoS ONE 14(12):e0225643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chung EJ, Kim JH, Ahn HS, Koh HJ (2007) Combination of laser photocoagulation and intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for aggressive zone I retinopathy of prematurity. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245(11):1727–1730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Autrata R, Senková K, Holousová M, Krejcírová I, Dolezel Z, Borek I (2012) [Effects of intravitreal pegaptanib or bevacizumab and laser in treatment of threshold retinopathy of prematurity in zone I and posterior zone II–four years results]. Cesk Slov Oftalmol 68(1):29–36 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang SD, Zhang GM (2020) Laser therapy versus intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents in monotherapy of ROP: a Meta-analysis. Int J Ophthalmol 13(5):806–815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Li Z, Zhang Y, Liao Y, Zeng R, Zeng P, Lan Y (2018) Comparison of efficacy between anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and laser treatment in Type-1 and threshold retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). BMC Ophthalmol 18(1):19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhang G, Yang M, Zeng J, Vakros G, Su K, Chen M et al (2017) COMPARISON OF INTRAVITREAL INJECTION OF RANIBIZUMAB VERSUS LASER THERAPY FOR ZONE II TREATMENT-REQUIRING RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY. Retina 37(4):710–717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wutthiworawong B, Thitiratsanont U, Saovaprut C, Subhangkasen I, Geyuraphun B, Ampornprut A et al (2011) Combine intravitreal bevacizumab injection with laser treatment for aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (AP-ROP). J Med Assoc Thai 94(Suppl 3):S15–21 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kumawat D, Sachan A, Shah P, Chawla R, Chandra P (2021) Aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity: a review on current understanding. Eye (Lond) 35(4):1140–1158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Narnaware SH, Bawankule PK, Raje D (2021) Aggressive Posterior Retinopathy of Prematurity (APROP): LASER as the Primary Modality of Treatment. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 16(3):400–407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chang E, Josan AS, Purohit R, Patel CK, Xue K (2022) A Network Meta-Analysis of Retreatment Rates following Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, Aflibercept, and Laser for Retinopathy of Prematurity. Ophthalmology 129(12):1389–1401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Miyakubo H, Hashimoto K, Miyakubo S (1984) Retinal vascular pattern in familial exudative vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmology 91(12):1524–1530 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mohd Khair SZN, Ismail AS, Embong Z, Mohamed Yusoff AA (2019) Detection of FZD4, LRP5 and TSPAN12 Genes Variants in Malay Premature Babies with Retinopathy of Prematurity. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 14(2):171–178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tao T, Xu N, Li J, Li H, Qu J, Yin H et al (2021) Ocular Features and Mutation Spectrum of Patients With Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 62(15):4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kashani AH, Brown KT, Chang E, Drenser KA, Capone A, Trese MT (2014) Diversity of retinal vascular anomalies in patients with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmology 121(11):2220–2227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tauqeer Z, Yonekawa Y (2018) Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 7(3):176–182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pendergast SD, Trese MT (1998) Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy. Results of surgical management. Ophthalmology 105(6):1015–1023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shukla D, Singh J, Sudheer G, Soman M, John RK, Ramasamy K et al (2003) Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR). Clinical profile and management. Indian J Ophthalmol 51(4):323–328 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chen C, Cheng Y, Zhang Z, Zhang X, Li J, Zhao P et al (2022) Long-term clinical prognosis of 335 infant single-gene positive FEVR cases. BMC Ophthalmol 22(1):329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sen M, Shields CL, Honavar SG, Shields JA (2019) Coats disease: An overview of classification, management and outcomes. Indian J Ophthalmol 67(6):763–771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Shields JA, Shields CL, Honavar SG, Demirci H, Cater J (2001) Classification and management of Coats disease: the 2000 Proctor Lecture. Am J Ophthalmol 131(5):572–583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shapiro MJ, Chow CC, Karth PA, Kiernan DF, Blair MP (2011) Effects of green diode laser in the treatment of pediatric Coats disease. Am J Ophthalmol 151(4):725–31e2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Reichstein DA, Recchia FM (2011) Coats disease and exudative retinopathy. Int Ophthalmol Clin 51(1):93–112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kang HG, Kim JD, Choi EY, Byeon SH, Kim SS, Koh HJ et al (2021) Clinical features and prognostic factors in 71 eyes over 20 years from patients with Coats’ disease in Korea. Sci Rep 11(1):6124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Han JC, Kwun YK, Cho SH, Kee C (2015) Long-term outcomes of argon laser photocoagulation in small size cyclodialysis cleft. BMC Ophthalmol 15:123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Świerczyńska M, Tronina A, Lorenc A, Filipek E (2023) Anterior uveitis and coats disease in a 16-year-old girl with noonan syndrome-a case report. Child (Basel). ;10(10) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 50.Othman IS, Eissa SA, Kotb MS, Sadek SH (2014) Subthreshold diode-laser micropulse photocoagulation as a primary and secondary line of treatment in management of diabetic macular edema. Clin Ophthalmol 8:653–659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhang L, Ke Y, Wang W, Shi X, Hei K, Li X (2018) The efficacy of conbercept or ranibizumab intravitreal injection combined with laser therapy for Coats’ disease. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 256(7):1339–1346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kumar A, Kumar P, Ambiya V, Mishra SK (2022) Subthreshold micropulse laser for adult onset Coats’ associated exudative maculopathy. Eur J Ophthalmol 32(5):Np29–np31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ramasubramanian A, Shields CL (2012) Bevacizumab for Coats’ disease with exudative retinal detachment and risk of vitreoretinal traction. Br J Ophthalmol 96(3):356–359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ghorbanian S, Jaulim A, Chatziralli IP (2012) Diagnosis and treatment of coats’ disease: a review of the literature. Ophthalmologica 227(4):175–182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Shields CL, Udyaver S, Dalvin LA, Lim LS, Atalay HT, CT LK et al (2019) Coats disease in 351 eyes: Analysis of features and outcomes over 45 years (by decade) at a single center. Indian J Ophthalmol 67(6):772–783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hamburg A (1970) Norrie’s disease. Ophthalmologica 160(5):375–377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Black G, Redmond RM (1994) The molecular biology of Norrie’s disease. Eye (Lond) 8(Pt 5):491–496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jacklin HN (1980) Falciform fold, retinal detachment, and Norrie’s disease. Am J Ophthalmol 90(1):76–80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ohlmann A, Tamm ER (2012) Norrin: molecular and functional properties of an angiogenic and neuroprotective growth factor. Prog Retin Eye Res 31(3):243–257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chow CC, Kiernan DF, Chau FY, Blair MP, Ticho BH, Galasso JM et al (2010) Laser photocoagulation at birth prevents blindness in Norrie’s disease diagnosed using amniocentesis. Ophthalmology 117(12):2402–2406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sisk RA, Hufnagel RB, Bandi S, Polzin WJ, Ahmed ZM (2014) Planned preterm delivery and treatment of retinal neovascularization in Norrie disease. Ophthalmology 121(6):1312–1313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Swinney CC, Han DP, Karth PA (2015) Incontinentia Pigmenti: A Comprehensive Review and Update. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 46(6):650–657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Goldberg MF, Custis PH (1993) Retinal and other manifestations of incontinentia pigmenti (Bloch-Sulzberger syndrome). Ophthalmology 100(11):1645–1654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Islam YFK, Khurshid SG (2022) Incontinentia pigmenti and the eye. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 33(6):525–531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Equi RA, Bains HS, Jampol L, Goldberg MF (2003) Retinal tears occurring at the border of vascular and avascular retina in adult patients with incontinentia pigmenti. Retina 23(4):574–576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chen CJ, Han IC, Tian J, Muñoz B, Goldberg MF (2015) Extended Follow-up of Treated and Untreated Retinopathy in Incontinentia Pigmenti: Analysis of Peripheral Vascular Changes and Incidence of Retinal Detachment. JAMA Ophthalmol 133(5):542–548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Gupta A, Singh P, Tripathy K (2024) Morning glory syndrome. statpearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2024. StatPearls Publishing LLC. [PubMed]
- 68.Ceynowa DJ, Wickström R, Olsson M, Ek U, Eriksson U, Wiberg MK et al (2015) Morning glory disc anomaly in childhood - a population-based study. Acta Ophthalmol 93(7):626–634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ran H, Ren J, Li S, Han H, Liu H, Ai Z et al (2023) Progression of bilateral morning glory syndrome associated with unilateral persistent fetal vasculture: A case report of long term follow-up in an infant. Eur J Ophthalmol. 33(6):NP82–NP86. 10.1177/11206721231156493 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 70.Yu G, Zhai Z, Ge J (2023) Morning Glory Syndrome With Bergmeister Papilla and Retinal Detachment. JAMA Ophthalmol 141(2):e225555–e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Safari A, Jafari E, Borhani-Haghighi A (2014) Morning glory syndrome associated with multiple sclerosis. Iran J Neurol 13(3):177–180 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Panyala R, Mahesh M, Singh A, Samanta R (2020) An unusual association of Morning Glory Syndrome with chronic myeloid leukemia-Philadelphia chromosome. J Family Med Prim Care 9(8):4456–4459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sakamoto M, Kuniyoshi K, Hayashi S, Yamashita H, Kusaka S (2020) Total retinal detachment and contractile movement of the disc in eyes with morning glory syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 20:100964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Bartz-Schmidt KU, Heimann K (1995) Pathogenesis of retinal detachment associated with morning glory disc. Int Ophthalmol 19(1):35–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ho CL, Wei LC (2001) Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in morning glory syndrome pathogenesis and treatment. Int Ophthalmol 24(1):21–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Jain N, Johnson MW (2014) Pathogenesis and treatment of maculopathy associated with cavitary optic disc anomalies. Am J Ophthalmol 158(3):423–435 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Saab MG, Cordahi GP, Rezende FA (2011) Fibrin sealant in the treatment of retinal detachment in morning glory syndrome. Retin Cases Brief Rep 5(4):326–329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Shen J, Chen X, Gong X, Wu Z (2022) Internal limiting membrane packing for treatment of morning glory syndrome with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 26:101454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Sen P, Maitra P, Vaidya H, Bhende P, Das K (2021) Outcomes of vitreoretinal surgery in retinal detachment associated with morning glory disc anomaly. Indian J Ophthalmol 69(8):2116–2121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Babu N, Kohli P (2021) Surgical challenges in the management of morning glory disc anomaly-associated retinal detachment. Indian J Ophthalmol 69(9):2540–2541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kiang L, Johnson MW (2017) Formation of an Intraretinal Fluid Barrier in Cavitary Optic Disc Maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 173:34–44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Bloch E, da Cruz L (2021) Dense laser at the papillomacular bundle does not cause loss of visual function. Eur J Ophthalmol 31(4):2160–2164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Abouammoh MA, Alsulaiman SM, Gupta VS, Mousa A, Hirakata A, Berrocal MH et al (2016) Pars plana vitrectomy with juxtapapillary laser photocoagulation versus vitrectomy without juxtapapillary laser photocoagulation for the treatment of optic disc pit maculopathy: the results of the KKESH International Collaborative Retina Study Group. Br J Ophthalmol 100(4):478–483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Zou YH, She KQ, Ren JN, Liang TY, Fei P, Xu Y et al (2022) Prophylactic juxtapapillary laser photocoagulation in pediatric morning glory syndrome. Int J Ophthalmol 15(5):766–772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Hartong DT, Berson EL, Dryja TP (2006) Retinitis pigmentosa. Lancet 368(9549):1795–1809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Hamel C (2006) Retinitis pigmentosa. Orphanet J Rare Dis 1:40 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Daiger SP, Sullivan LS, Bowne SJ (2013) Genes and mutations causing retinitis pigmentosa. Clin Genet 84(2):132–141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Gawęcki M (2020) Laser treatment in retinitis pigmentosa-a review. Lasers Med Sci 35(8):1663–1670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Lavinsky D, Wang J, Huie P, Dalal R, Lee SJ, Lee DY et al (2016) Nondamaging Retinal Laser Therapy: Rationale and Applications to the Macula. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57(6):2488–2500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Luttrull JK (2018) Improved retinal and visual function following panmacular subthreshold diode micropulse laser for retinitis pigmentosa. Eye (Lond) 32(6):1099–1110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Qaiser H, Sadiq K, Afroze B (2022) Blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome in a Pakistani child: A case report and regional literature review. J Pak Med Assoc 72(2):349–353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Khanna S, Rodriguez SH, Blair MA, Wroblewski K, Shapiro MJ, Blair MP (2022) Laser Prophylaxis in Patients with Stickler Syndrome. Ophthalmol Retina 6(4):263–267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Ridley M, Green J, Johnson G (1986) Retinal angiomatosis: the ocular manifestations of von Hippel-Lindau disease. Can J Ophthalmol 21(7):276–283 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Lee GD, Chen VM, Barnes AC, Goldman DR, Duker JS (2014) Retinal telangiectasis detected during a vision screening examination in a child with hearing loss led to the diagnosis of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. J aapos 18(3):303–305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Moloney TP, Patel C, Gole GA (2014) Exudative vasculopathy in a child with Leber congenital amaurosis. J aapos 18(3):297–299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Chang MY, Borchert MS, Schmidt R, Nagiel A (2022) Neovascularization of the optic disc and peripheral retinal ischemia in a child with a novel variant in ALMS1 (Alström syndrome). Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 26:101506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Soliman SE, VandenHoven C, MacKeen LD, Gallie BL (2020) Secondary prevention of retinoblastoma revisited: laser photocoagulation of invisible new retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology 127(1):122–127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data availability is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
