Skip to main content
Microbial Ecology logoLink to Microbial Ecology
. 2026 Sep 1;89:196. doi: 10.1007/s00248-026-02867-3

Exploratory analysis of nasal and gut microbial community structure in preschool children with recurrent wheeze

Silvia Gschwendtner 1, Nicole Maison 2,3,4, Sabina Illi 3,4, Erika von Mutius 2,3,4, Ilona Rosenboom 5,6, Burkhard Tümmler 5,6, Anna-Maria Dittrich 5,6,7, Markus Weckmann 8,9,10, Mustafa Abdo 8,11, Benjamin Waschki 8,11, Matthias V Kopp 8,9,12, Gesine Hansen 5,6, Folke Brinkmann 8,9, Klaus Rabe 8,11, Bianca Schaub 2,3,13, Michael Schloter 1,3,14,✉; the ALLIANCE Study Group
PMCID: PMC13719913  PMID: 42955378

Abstract

Early-life wheezing has been associated with microbial alterations along the gut-airway axis, yet few studies have examined bacterial communities in both compartments within the same children. This cross-sectional exploratory pilot study (n=25) characterized nasal and stool bacterial communities in children aged 1–4 years with recurrent wheeze and healthy controls using 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding. Across participants, nasal and stool bacteriomes were highly individualized and taxonomically diverse. Overall richness, evenness, and global community composition did not differ significantly between healthy controls and children with recurrent wheeze in either compartment. Nasal communities in the recurrent-wheeze group showed greater within-group dispersion, although the comparison did not reach the conventional significance threshold (p=0.054). Exploratory distance-based stratification identified a subgroup with nasal profiles farther from the healthy-control centroid; these profiles had lower richness and evenness, higher Moraxella abundance, and lower abundances of Prevotella spp., Alloprevotella, and Veillonella. No statistically supported genus-level differences were detected in stool samples. Community-assembly and co-occurrence analyses yielded group-specific descriptive patterns in both compartments. Different sets of cross-compartment correlations passed the multiple-testing threshold in healthy controls and children with recurrent wheeze, including correlations of stool Lactococcus with several nasal taxa in the recurrent-wheeze group. Because these analyses were performed in small groups, they are considered hypothesis-generating. These findings identify nasal microbial heterogeneity and exploratory differences in community organization in preschool children with recurrent wheeze, while providing no evidence for causal or Moraxella-driven effects. Larger longitudinal studies with functional measurements are required for validation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-026-02867-3.

Keywords: Gut-airway axis, Nasal microbiome, Gut microbiome, Recurrent preschool wheeze, Exploratory pilot study, ALLIANCE cohort

Introduction

Human microbiota play a central role in regulating local and systemic immune function. A prominent example of such systemic crosstalk is the axis between the gut and the respiratory system, describing bidirectional communication between intestinal and airway microbiomes mediated by microbial metabolites and immune modulation [1–3]. Increasing evidence indicates that this axis is associated with asthma pathogenesis, particularly during early life when immune development is highly sensitive to environmental influences [4, 5].

The gut microbiome begins to establish at birth and undergoes rapid succession during infancy. In human studies, stool samples commonly serve as a non-invasive proxy for intestinal microbial communities. Early colonization is influenced by mode of delivery, diet, and environmental exposures [6]. During early infancy, Bifidobacterium species dominate, particularly in breastfed infants [7, 8]. With the introduction of complementary feeding, microbial diversity increases with greater representation of Bacteroides and Firmicutes including Blautia, Faecalibacterium, and Roseburia [7]. By approximately three years of age, the microbiome stabilizes toward an adult-like configuration dominated by Bacteroides, Prevotella, and various Firmicutes [8, 9].

The respiratory microbiome develops along a dynamic trajectory. Nasal swabs characterize the nasal upper-airway niche and may provide information on microbial colonization at the entrance of the respiratory tract. They do not, however, directly measure lower-airway communities. In early infancy, nasal communities are typically dominated by Staphylococcus and Corynebacterium [10], while Alloiococcus and Moraxella increase during the first year of life [11]. Early colonization with Streptococcus and Haemophilus has been associated with viral respiratory tract infections, although these genera may also occur during normal microbial succession [11]. With increasing age, nasal communities diversify further, with taxa such as Dolosigranulum and Corynebacterium becoming more prominent by two to three years of age [12]. Early upper-airway microbial composition and diversity have been linked to immune development and allergic sensitization [13].

Consistent with these observations, early microbial dysbiosis in either the intestinal or airway microbiome has been associated with wheezing illnesses and subsequent asthma development [11, 14–18]. While these findings support the concept of an axis of the gut and the respiratory system, most studies have examined the gut or respiratory microbiome separately, and investigations assessing microbial communities of both organs in parallel remain rare.

To address this gap, we characterized stool and nasal bacterial communities in children aged 1–4 years with recurrent wheeze (n=17) and healthy controls (n=8) in a cross-sectional exploratory pilot study. Stool samples and nasal swabs served as proxies for intestinal and nasal upper-airway microbiomes, respectively. Using 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding, we assessed community composition, diversity, assembly patterns, co-occurrence networks, and cross-compartment correlations. Given the limited sample size and cross-sectional design, these analyses were intended to generate hypotheses rather than establish causal microbial signatures of wheeze or asthma risk.

Materials and Methods

Study Design

The ALLIANCE cohort of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL) is a prospective multicenter asthma cohort recruiting in five pediatric specialist centers (Hannover, Luebeck, Munich, Marburg and Cologne) and two adult specialist centers (LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Research Centre Borstel), registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (pediatric arm NCT02496468, adult arm NCT02419274) and ethically approved across all study centers. Parents of study participants aged < 18 years and study participants aged ≥ 18 years gave written informed consent.

Eligibility for this exploratory pilot study required age 1–4 years, availability of paired nasal swab and stool samples, and wheeze status. The recurrent-wheeze group (hereafter termed “wheezers” for brevity) comprised 19 children selected from 221 children with at least two wheezing episodes during the preceding 12 months, based on parental reports. Two children were excluded because their nasal swabs yielded no bacterial sequencing reads; their corresponding stool samples were also excluded to maintain paired analyses, resulting in 17 wheezers. Eight age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC) were selected from 54 controls who had never been diagnosed with asthma or preschool wheeze, irrespective of other allergic diseases. This definition does not exclude every possible isolated episode of acute wheeze. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Details regarding study design, parameter definitions, inclusion criteria, and methods are provided in the Supplementary Material and have been published previously [19].

Table 1.

Summary of baseline characteristics of the study cohort

Characteristic Overall Healthy Wheeze p value 1
N = 25 N = 8 N = 17
Age (year) 2.70 (1.90–3.30) 2.65 (1.90–2.85) 3.00 (1.90–3.40) 0.209
Female 8 (32%) 4 (50%) 4 (24%) 0.359
BMI (kg/m2) 16.80 (15.50–17.94) 16.50 (15.35–17.30) 16.98 (15.50–18.20) 0.268
Any sibling 16 (64%) 4 (50%) 12 (71%) 0.394
Daycare 23 (92%) 8 (100%) 15 (88%) > 0.999
Pet in household (cat/dog) 9 (36%) 2 (25%) 7 (41%) 0.661
Asthma or recurrent spastic/obstructive bronchitis - DD 2 (8.3%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 0.536
Missing 1 0 1
Hayfever - DD 1 (4.2%) 0 (0%) 1 (5.9%) > 0.999
Missing 1 1 0
Eczema - DD 2 (8.3%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 0.536
Missing 1 0 1
Food allergy - DD 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) -- 2
Missing 1 1 0
Birthmode 0.095
Vaginal delivery 15 (60%) 7 (88%) 8 (47%)
Primary cesarean section 6 (24%) 0 (0%) 6 (35%)
Secondary cesarean section 2 (8.0%) 1 (13%) 1 (5.9%)
Operative vaginal delivery 2 (8.0%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%)
Any exclusive breastfeeding ever 19 (76%) 5 (63%) 14 (82%) 0.344
Any hypoallergenic formula ever 9 (36%) 1 (13%) 8 (47%) 0.182
Prior RSV infection ever 7 (32%) 0 (0%) 7 (47%) 0.051
Missing 3 1 2
Antibiotics given for recurrent cough ever 1 (33%) NA 1 (33%) -- 2
Missing 22 8 14
Systemic steroids ever 9 (53%) NA 9 (53%) -- 2
Missing 8 8 0
ICS ever 13 (76%) NA 13 (76%) -- 2
Missing 8 8 0
Hb (g/dl) 11.60 (11.40–12.30) 11.60 (11.30–12.30) 11.90 (11.45–12.25) 0.365
Missing 2 1 1
Thrombocytes (103/μl) 374 (328–443) 328 (263–367) 403 (372–443) 0.045
Missing 2 1 1
Leucocytes (103/μl) 9.44 (8.23–11.70) 10.00 (5.24–14.00) 9.27 (8.24–11.65) 0.841
Missing 2 1 1
Neutrophils (%) 40 (33–55) 38 (31–58) 42 (36–55) 0.947
Missing 2 1 1
Lymphocytes (%) 42 (34–54) 53 (27–60) 40 (36–47) 0.593
Missing 2 1 1
Eosinophils (%) 1.95 (1.00–3.00) 2.50 (1.00–3.50) 1.50 (0.78–2.40) 0.243
Missing 3 1 2
Basophils (%) 0.20 (0.00–0.70) 0.00 (0.00–0.20) 0.55 (0.08–1.00) 0.036
Missing 4 1 3
IgE (IU/ml) 39.0 (9.1–73.8) 47.5 (24.0–61.4) 19.2 (9.0–82.0) 0.583
Missing 2 0 2
Atopy (spec. IgE to any allergen ≥ 0.7 kU/L) 8 (32%) 3 (38%) 5 (29%) > 0.999

Values are summarized as median and interquartile range (Q1–Q3) in brackets, or as total numbers per condition level and percentage in brackets

DD parental report of doctor’s diagnosis

1Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test; Fisher's exact test

2p value not calculated due to insufficient variability (single-level data) and/or missing values

Microbiome Analysis

Details on microbiome sample processing and subsequent data analysis are provided in Supplementary Material. Briefly, DNA was extracted via ultrasonication (nose) and a phenol-chloroform-based protocol (stool). Amplicon sequencing of the V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene was performed on a MiSeq Illumina instrument using the universal eubacterial primers 515F/806R [20, 21]. To identify potential contaminants deriving from DNA extraction and library preparation, both extraction and PCR no template control samples (each 4) were processed together with biological samples. All biological and control samples were sequenced in a single sequencing run to avoid batch effects related to processing steps. Sequence data generated in this study have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA1499410.

Sequence processing was performed using DADA2 v 1.30 [22], followed by taxonomic assignment via SILVA v138.1. Reads classified as mitochondrial or chloroplast in origin, or lacking phylum-level annotation were excluded. All blank controls were processed and sequenced alongside the biological samples. After DADA2 denoising, blank controls yielded 0–6 reads per sample, corresponding to <0.01% of the mean sequencing depth of the biological samples (74,896 reads). Across all blank controls, seven amplicon sequence variants (ASV) were detected and assigned to the genera Agathobacter, Bacteroides, Faecalibacterium, Moraxella, Pediococcus, and Streptococcus, while one ASV remained unclassified at the phylum level. None of these ASV was detected in more than one blank control. Only ASV 653 (Pediococcus) was consistently identified as a potential contaminant using prevalence-based decontam analysis at thresholds of 0.1 and 0.5 [23] and was therefore removed from all biological samples. Quality-control information for the blank controls, including DNA concentration, read numbers before and after DADA2 denoising, detected ASV, their occurrence in biological samples, and their mean relative abundance, is provided in Supplementary Table S1. Given the extremely low sequencing depth of the blank controls, the absence of recurrent ASV across blank controls, and the decontam results, there was no evidence of systematic contamination by the remaining ASV, which were therefore retained in the biological-sample dataset. Following removal of ASV 653, the dataset comprised 3,744,773 reads assigned to 2,177 ASVs for subsequent analyses.

All plots and statistics were performed in R version 4.5.1 (https://www.R-project.org). Subsequent bioinformatic analyses were performed to characterize microbial communities in HC and wheezers, including assessments of alpha and beta diversity, core microbiome structure, within-group variability, and microbial biomarkers (ANCOM-BC2). Additional analyses explored associations between microbial taxa, individual variability and host factors, cross-compartment correlations, microbial community assembly processes (βNTI and RCbray framework), and bacterial co-occurrence networks (NetCoMi). Furthermore, wheezers were stratified into healthy-like and divergent microbiome profiles and their associated features were examined. Detailed protocols are provided in Supplementary Material.

Results

Cohort Characteristics

The study comprised 25 preschool participants: 17 children with recurrent wheeze and 8 healthy controls (HC) (Table 1). Age, sex, early-life and environmental exposures, and most recorded clinical variables were not statistically different between groups. Prior RSV infection nevertheless showed a clinically relevant imbalance: it was reported in 7 of 15 wheezers with available data and in 0 of 7 controls with available data (Fisher’s exact p=0.051). Antibiotic information was largely missing, and systemic or inhaled steroid exposure was recorded only for wheezers. Wheezers had higher thrombocyte and blood basophil counts (Fisher’s exact p=0.045 and p=0.036, respectively); no statistically supported differences were observed for the other measured hematological or immunological parameters.

Overall nasal and stool diversity is similar between groups, with greater nasal dispersion in children with recurrent wheeze

Across participants, nasal and stool bacteriomes were taxonomically diverse but highly individualized. The nasal bacteriome comprised 936 ASV and stool samples 1033 ASV, with overlap but more wheezer-specific variants (Fig. 1a). Group-specific core ASV decreased rapidly with increasing prevalence thresholds in both compartments, indicating limited overlap between individuals (Fig. 1a; Supplementary Table S2). Nevertheless, alpha diversity metrics indicated comparable richness and evenness between HC and wheezers in both compartments (Supplementary Fig. S1a), and NMDS analysis of weighted UniFrac distances showed no group separation (Supplementary Fig. S1b).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Nasal and gut microbiome composition in healthy (n = 8) and wheezing (n = 17) children. (a) Shared and unique ASV and core ASV across prevalence thresholds. Top: Venn diagrams showing shared and group-specific ASV in nasal and stool samples. Bottom: Number of core ASV across prevalence thresholds (50–100%), defined as ASV present in ≥ X% of samples within each study group. (b) Relative abundance of the 20 most abundant genera. No significant differences in genus abundance were detected between groups (ANCOM-BC2; Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted p < 0.05). Effect sizes, 95% CI, and p values are listed in Supplementary Table S3. (c) Within-group variation (beta-dispersion) calculated from weighted UniFrac distances. Statistical significance was assessed using Levene’s test and confirmed using generalized linear mixed-effects models with Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment for multiple testing. (d) Spearman correlations between beta-dispersion and bacterial genera. Only the 20 strongest correlations, ranked by Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rho), are shown. Asterisks indicate statistically significant correlations (Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted p < 0.05). Correlations were calculated using Spearman’s rank correlation test. Effect sizes, 95% CI, and p values are listed in Supplementary Table S4

Nasal bacterial communities were dominated by Haemophilus, Moraxella, Streptococcus, Veillonella, and Prevotella-related taxa (Fig. 1b). Moraxella occasionally dominated individual profiles (Supplementary Fig. S2), but its abundance did not differ significantly between groups (β = 0.57, 95% CI [−0.53, 1.67], adjusted p = 0.308). Among 11 Moraxella ASV, one variant closely related to Moraxella nonliquefaciens predominated across samples (Supplementary Fig. S3) but occurred more consistently in HC despite its lower relative abundance (Supplementary Table S2). Beta-dispersion was higher in wheezers than in HC, although the comparison was of borderline statistical support (Levene test, F = 3.94, p=0.054; Fig. 1c). Furthermore, wheezers showed significant negative associations between dispersion and nasal genera, including Neisseria (rho = −0.69, 95% CI [−0.94, −0.21], adjusted p = 0.032), Prevotella (rho = −0.82, 95% CI [−0.95, −0.44], adjusted p = 0.003), and Veillonella (rho = −0.74, 95% CI [−0.89, −0.34], adjusted p = 0.015), while Moraxella was positively associated but not statistically significant (rho = 0.64, 95% CI [0.07, 0.92], adjusted p = 0.064).

Stool communities showed higher richness (β = 0.23, 95% CI [0.16, 0.29], adjusted p<0.001) and evenness (β = 0.67, 95% CI [0.21, 1.13], adjusted p=0.019) than nasal communities (Supplementary Fig. S1) and were dominated by Bacteroides and Faecalibacterium (>43% of reads; Fig. 1b). No genus-level differences between wheezers and HC were statistically supported after correction for multiple testing. Stool within-group dispersion was lower than nasal dispersion (β = −0.69, 95% CI [−0.90, −0.47], adjusted p<0.001; Fig. 1c), and the difference between wheezers and HC was not statistically significant (Levene test, F = 0.021, p=0.817). Associations between stool dispersion and individual genera were likewise not supported after correction for multiple comparisons (Fig. 1d).

Despite substantial inter-individual variability, several host-microbiome associations were observed. In the nose, leukocyte levels correlated negatively with Corynebacterium (rho = −0.69, 95% CI [−0.84, −0.34], adjusted p = 0.013), Dolosigranulum (rho = −0.58, 95% CI [−0.81, −0.06], adjusted p = 0.048) and Moraxella (rho = −0.61, 95% CI [−0.79, −0.22], adjusted p = 0.048) (Supplementary Fig. S4a). In stool, immune parameters were not associated with bacterial diversity. However, age correlated negatively with Bifidobacterium (rho = −0.73, 95% CI [−0.91, −0.39], adjusted p = 0.001), while Ruminococcus and Agathobacter were associated with gender (rho = 0.61, 95% CI [0.30, 0.81], adjusted p = 0.032; and rho = 0.71, 95% CI [0.48, 0.86], adjusted p = 0.003, respectively). Beta-dispersion, used as a measure of individual variability, was not associated with measured host parameters (Supplementary Fig. S4b).

Exploratory distance-based stratification identifies heterogeneous microbial profiles among wheezers

To explore heterogeneity among wheezers, we performed an explicitly exploratory distance-based stratification. Profiles within the 90% quantile of Euclidean distances around the HC centroid in ordination space were labelled “healthy-like,” whereas profiles beyond this threshold were labelled “community-divergent.” These labels describe relative similarity to the HC profiles; they do not demonstrate naturally occurring or independently validated clusters, and the threshold was not optimized against clinical outcomes. The resulting groups did not differ in the recorded demographic or clinical variables (Supplementary Table S3).

In the nasal bacteriome, 9 of 17 wheezers had a profile classified as healthy-like and 8 had a profile classified as community-divergent. The distance-defined divergent subgroup had higher individual variability but lower observed ASV richness, Shannon diversity, and evenness (Fig. 2a; Supplementary Table S4), together with higher Moraxella (LFC = 9.04, 95% CI [7.12, 10.95], adjusted p < 0.001) and lower commensals including Alloprevotella (LFC = −3.72, 95% CI [−4.77, −2.68], adjusted p < 0.001), Prevotella_7 (LFC = −3.99, 95% CI [−4.76, −3.21], adjusted p < 0.001), and Veillonella (LFC = −3.15, 95% CI [−4.11, −2.21], adjusted p < 0.001) abundances at genus (Fig. 2b) and ASV level (Fig. 2c). These comparisons describe the exploratory subgroups and do not establish Moraxella as a driver of the observed profiles.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Microbial signatures of exploratory distance-defined wheezer subgroups. (a) Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination based on Bray–Curtis distances, with alpha-diversity metrics (observed ASV, evenness and Shannon index), beta-dispersion and immune variables fitted as environmental vectors. Asterisks indicate vectors significantly associated with community composition (permutation test within the envfit function, p < 0.05). Vector length reflects the strength of the association with the ordination, and vector direction indicates the gradient of increasing values across the NMDS space. Blue and red symbols represent subjects classified as healthy-like and community-divergent wheezers, respectively, in both nasal and gut microbiomes; green and orange symbols represent subjects classified as healthy-like and community-divergent wheezers, respectively, in only one compartment (nasal or gut). Effect sizes, 95% CI, and p values of alpha diversity and beta-dispersion analysis are listed in Supplementary Table S6. (b) Relative abundance of the 20 most abundant genera. Asterisks indicate significant differences between healthy-like and community-divergent wheezers (ANCOM-BC2; Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted p < 0.05). Effect sizes, 95% CI, and p values are listed in Supplementary Table S7. (c) Log-fold changes (LFC) estimated by ANCOM-BC2 for the 20 ASV with the largest effect sizes differentiating the exploratory distance-defined subgroups. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences after Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment (adjusted p<0.05). Effect sizes, 95% CI, and p values are listed in Supplementary Table S8

In stool bacterial communities, 7 wheezers were classified as community-divergent based on their distance from the HC centroid. Differences between the distance-defined subgroups were less pronounced than in nasal samples, and no genus-level differences were statistically supported after correction for multiple testing (Fig. 2b). Recorded baseline parameters did not differ between stool-based subgroups (Supplementary Table S3).

Partial overlap between compartments was observed: four of the eight nasal-divergent wheezers were also classified as divergent in stool, whereas the remaining individuals showed healthy-like stool profiles. Similarly, six of nine healthy-like wheezers displayed concordant bacterial signatures in both compartments.

Exploratory community-assembly and co-occurrence patterns in nasal and stool bacteriomes

To investigate processes that may shape nasal and stool bacterial communities, we estimated the relative contribution of stochastic and deterministic assembly mechanisms using βNTI and RCbray metrics (Fig. 3). Stochastic processes dominated the classifications in both compartments. Whereas HC nasal communities were classified mainly as dispersal limitation (restricted microbial exchange between individuals/environments) or drift (random fluctuations in microbial abundances), a small fraction of pairwise comparisons in wheezers was also assigned to variable selection. Stool communities were also classified mainly as dispersal limitation, with a larger contribution of selective processes among wheezers than among HC. Given the small group sizes and cross-sectional design, these patterns are hypothesis-generating and do not identify the responsible host or environmental mechanisms.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Community assembly processes in the nasal and gut microbiomes of healthy (n = 8) and wheezing (n = 17) children. Community assembly mechanisms were inferred using β-nearest taxon index (βNTI) and Raup–Crick Bray–Curtis (RCbray) metrics. Thresholds of |βNTI|= 2 and |RCbray|= 0.95 are indicated by horizontal and vertical dashed lines, respectively

Exploratory co-occurrence networks constructed separately for HC and wheezers showed different topological summaries in nasal and stool bacteriomes (Fig. 4). Networks estimated for wheezers had fewer nodes and modules and lower modularity in both compartments, while clustering coefficients and several centrality measures were higher. The distance-defined divergent subgroup showed higher modularity and lower clustering and centrality measures than the overall wheezer group. Network hubs also differed descriptively between groups: in nasal samples, hub ASV shifted from Staphylococcus and Cutibacterium in HC to Leptotrichia, Fusobacterium, and Prevotella spp. in wheezers; in stool samples, hubs shifted from Veillonella and Roseburia toward Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcus. These separately estimated networks were not subjected to inferential testing of between-group differences and therefore do not demonstrate altered microbial interactions or ecosystem fragmentation.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Exploratory bacterial co-occurrence networks in healthy (n=8) and wheezing (n=17) children. Bacterial co-occurrence networks were constructed from core ASV, defined as ASV present in ≥ 50% of subjects, in nasal and stool samples from healthy and wheezing children. Nodes represent ASV and edges represent inferred associations between pairs of ASV estimated using SpiecEasi (green: positive associations; red: negative associations). Modules, shown in different colours, represent groups of highly interconnected nodes. Hub taxa are highlighted in bold, and node size is proportional to eigenvector centrality. The accompanying table summarises key network topological characteristics, including the number of nodes, clustering coefficient, modularity, positive edge percentage (PEP), edge density, robustness, average path length, centrality measures (degree, betweenness, closeness and eigenvector centrality), and the number of modules

Exploratory cross-compartment correlations between nasal and stool bacterial communities

Within-group Spearman analyses identified different sets of nasal–stool correlations that passed the multiple-testing threshold (Fig. 5): 42 correlations in HC (|ρ|≥0.97) and 53 in wheezers (|ρ|≥0.82), most of which were positive. The correlation coefficients were not compared directly between groups; therefore, the counts should be interpreted descriptively and in light of the unequal group sizes.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Within-group cross-compartment correlations in healthy (n=8) and wheezing (n=17) children. Spearman correlations were calculated between individual ASV in nasal and stool samples. Only correlations passing the Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted threshold (p<0.05) are shown. Correlation coefficients were not compared directly between groups

In HC, positive correlations were mainly observed among commensals, including nasal ASV assigned to Prevotella, Neisseria, Actinomyces, and Veillonella and stool ASV related to Aggregatibacter. In addition, stool ASV210 (Lachnoclostridium) and ASV69 (Staphylococcus) were negatively associated with nasal ASV assigned to Actinomyces, Streptococcus, and Prevotella, suggesting coordinated variation across compartments in HC.

Among wheezers, several nasal ASV assigned to Corynebacterium, Dolosigranulum, and Moraxella correlated positively with stool Lactococcus ASV265 (ρ=0.82–0.94). Further within-group correlations included nasal Dolosigranulum and Mycoplasma ASV with stool Staphylococcus (ASV69), nasal Veillonella with stool Faecalibacterium and Blautia, and stool Escherichia–Shigella (ASV20) with nasal Neisseriaceae_u (ASV97). The distance-defined divergent subgroup retained fewer statistically supported cross-compartment correlations, mainly involving stool Escherichia–Shigella, Faecalibacterium, and Rothia (Supplementary Fig. S4). These analyses identify co-variation within groups but do not establish that correlation patterns differed statistically between groups.

Discussion

Nasal bacterial communities show heterogeneity and exploratory Moraxella-associated patterns

In this cross-sectional exploratory pilot study, we analysed paired nasal and stool bacterial communities from preschool children with recurrent wheeze and HC. Overall richness and global community composition were comparable between groups, while nasal communities among wheezers showed greater inter-individual dispersion of borderline statistical support. The main results therefore concern heterogeneity of nasal profiles rather than a consistent group-wide microbial signature.

Moraxella is a common colonizer of the upper airways, and previous studies have reported contrasting associations with respiratory health. It can occur as part of healthy early-life communities [10, 24], but Moraxella-dominated profiles have also been associated with respiratory infection and wheezing [11, 25]. In the present dataset, Moraxella abundance did not differ significantly between the full wheezer and HC groups. Moraxella-rich profiles co-occurred with lower richness and evenness only within an exploratory distance-defined subgroup. This observation does not establish Moraxella as a driver and may reflect prior viral infection, treatment exposure, host immunity, or another unmeasured factor. Larger longitudinal studies stratified by infection and treatment history, with metagenomic, metabolomic, and immunological measurements, will be needed to test these alternatives.

Stool bacterial communities show limited differences at preschool age

Stool bacterial communities showed no statistically supported genus-level differences between wheezers and HC. This result is compatible with previous reports that intestinal microbial signatures associated with asthma risk may be strongest during early infancy [15, 17, 18], but the present cross-sectional study cannot determine whether earlier differences normalized, persisted below the detection limit, or were absent in these children.

Longitudinal studies have identified infancy as an important period for intestinal microbial development and immune maturation [14, 16]. By preschool age, diet and environmental exposures may contribute to convergence of stool bacterial communities. Antibiotic exposure may also influence these patterns [26, 27], but the high proportion of missing antibiotic data in the present cohort precluded an informative assessment. The small sample size further limited power to detect subtle associations. Larger longitudinal cohorts are required to determine how intestinal profiles relate to recurrent wheeze, asthma development, systemic metabolites, and immune phenotypes.

Exploratory ecological and cross-compartment patterns

Beyond taxonomic composition, the ecological analyses yielded descriptive differences in community-assembly classifications between HC and wheezers. Stochastic processes dominated both compartments, consistent with models in which dispersal and drift contribute to microbial colonization [28]. The larger descriptive contribution of variable selection among wheezers may motivate hypotheses involving inflammation, prior viral infection, treatment, or local immune responses, but the present analysis cannot identify the responsible mechanism. The separately estimated co-occurrence networks also differed in modularity, node number, and centrality. Although reduced network complexity has been linked to lower ecological resilience in other systems [29, 30], association networks derived from 16S rRNA gene data do not measure metabolic interaction, cross-feeding, stability, or resilience directly. Differences in network topology may also arise from sample size, prevalence filtering, and compositional data structure. Consequently, these results should be treated as hypotheses for future studies integrating metagenomics, metabolomics, culture-based interaction experiments, and immune profiling rather than as evidence of ecosystem fragmentation.

Finally, different sets of cross-compartment correlations passed the multiple-testing threshold in HC and wheezers. Such co-variation may reflect shared diet, age, medication, infection history, immunity, or other environmental exposures. It neither demonstrates direct microbial exchange between the gut and nose nor establishes a gut-to-airway mechanism. Functional links through microbial metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids [31, 32], remain biologically plausible but were not measured in this study.

This study has several important limitations. The sample size was small, the design was cross-sectional, and convenience sampling may have introduced selection bias. Nasal swabs sample the nasal upper-airway niche and cannot be treated as direct measurements of the lower-airway microbiome. Because nasal swabs are low-biomass samples, conclusions also depend on quantitative evaluation of negative controls and potential batch effects. Although sequencing depth in the blank controls was very low, low-level background DNA was detected, and the possibility of low-level contamination cannot therefore be completely excluded, particularly for ASV detected at very low abundance in biological samples. However, no ASV was recurrent across blank controls, and only one ASV was identified as a potential contaminant by decontam and subsequently removed. Prior RSV infection was reported in 7 of 15 wheezers with available data but in none of the 7 controls with available data, and systemic or inhaled steroid exposure occurred only in the wheezer group. Effects of wheeze therefore cannot be separated from prior infection or treatment in this dataset, and sensitivity analyses are constrained by the remaining sample size. In addition, 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding has limited taxonomic resolution and does not establish strain-level identity or functional potential. Larger longitudinal studies incorporating quantitative contamination control, metagenomics, metabolomics, and immune profiling are needed to validate and extend these observations.

Conclusions

In this exploratory pilot study, overall richness and global community composition did not differ significantly between preschool children with recurrent wheeze and healthy controls. Wheezers showed greater heterogeneity of nasal bacterial profiles, and an exploratory distance-defined subgroup contained Moraxella-rich profiles with lower diversity. These findings do not establish Moraxella-driven clustering or causality. Group-specific community-assembly classifications, network summaries, and cross-compartment correlation sets provide hypotheses for future work but require independent validation in larger longitudinal cohorts with functional measurements.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Susanne Walch from the Research Unit Comparative Microbiome Analysis for her assistance with sequencing. We are thankful to our patients and healthy participants for their invaluable contribution to this work. We are indebted to our study participants and their families for participating in the study and the staff of the participating hospitals and primary care practices and our cooperation partners within the DZL for support and recruitment. We also thank the study nurses, the data managers, and all involved lab technicians.

Study group: Mira Bürka; Sybille Contentoa; Markus Egetc; Silvia Gschwendtnerv; Alexander Hosea; Sabina Illic; Constanze Jakwerthx; Lena Lagallya; Nicole Maisonac; Jimmy Omonyc; Bianca Schaubay; Michael Schloterv; Carsten Schmidt-Weberx; Lena Ullemeyera; Erika von Mutiusac; Esther Zeitlmanna; Mustafa Abdok; Thomas Bahmerk; Heike Billerk; Constantin Blanke-Roeserk; Folke Brinkmannd; Karoline I Gaedem; Wiebke Hagedornd; Nikolas Jacobsd; Anne-Marie Kirstenl; Inke R Könige; Matthias V Koppbd; Lea Kronziele; Gyde Nissend; Wasifa Nurievad; Frauke Pedersenk; Loana Pennerd; Klaus F Rabek; Isabell Ricklefsd; Silke Szymczake; Vera Veithk; Benjamin Waschkik; Henrik Watzl; Markus Weckmanndu; Christopher Wirksk; Marie Bickesf; Mifflin-Rae Calveron; David S DeLucan; Anna-Maria Dittrichf; Svenja Gaedcken; Ruth Grychtolf; Anika Habenerf; Gesine Hansenf; Christine Happlef; Adan Chari Jirmof; Bin Liun; Lennart Riemannf; Svenja Fothh; Inga Jerrentruph; Harald Renzo; Chrysanthi Skevakio; Stefanie Weberh; Miguel A Alejandre Alcazarpqrs; Lena Keufkenj; Silke van Koningsbruggen-Rietschelj; Ernst Rietschelj; Tobias Trojanj; and Jan-Christoph Thomassenj.

Affiliations:a Department of Paediatric Allergology, Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany, and Comprehensive Pneumology Center, Munich (CPC-M), Germany; German Center for Lung Research (DZL); b Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Inselspital, University Children's Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; c Institut für Asthma- und Allergieprävention (IAP), Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH), Munich, Germany; d University Children’s Hospital, Luebeck, Germany, and Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Germany; German Center for Lung Research (DZL); e Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, University Luebeck, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany, and Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Germany; German Center for Lung Research (DZL); fDepartment of Paediatric Pneumology, Allergology and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany, and Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH), Germany; German Center for Lung Research (DZL); g Department of Paediatric Pneumology, University Children’s Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany; h University Children’s Hospital Marburg, University of Marburg, Germany, and University of Giessen Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC); Member of the German Center for Lung Research; i Department of General Pediatrics and Neonatology, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg, Germany; j University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Pediatrics, Cologne, Germany; k LungenClinic Grosshansdorf GmbH, Grosshansdorf, Germany, and Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Germany; German Center for Lung Research (DZL); l Velocity Clinical Research Germany, Ahrensburg, formerly Pulmonary Research Institute at LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL).; m Research Center Borstel – Medical Clinic, Borstel, Germany, and Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Germany; German Center for Lung Research (DZL); n Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany, and Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH), Germany; German Center for Lung Research (DZL); o Institute of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiochemistry, Molecular Diagnostics, University of Marburg, Germany, and University of Gießen, Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC); German Center for Lung Research (DZL); p University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Translational Experimental Pediatrics - Experimental Pulmonology, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Germany; q University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Germany; rExcellence Cluster on Stress Responses in Aging-associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Germany.; s Institute for Lung Health, University of Giessen and Marburg Lung Centre (UGMLC), Member of the German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Gießen, Germany.; t Clinical Respiratory Epidemiology, Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany; u Division of Epigenetics in Chronic Lung Disease, Priority Area Chronic Lung Diseases, Leibniz Lung Center, Research Center Borstel, Borstel, Germany; vInstitute for Comparative Microbiome Analysis; Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH), Munich, Germany; x Center of Allergy and Environment (ZAUM), Technical University of Munich and Helmholtz Center Munich, Munich, Germany; yGerman Center for Child and Adolescent Health (DZKJ), Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany

Author Contributions

S. G. and M. S. contributed to study conceptualization, performed data analysis, and drafted the manuscript. N. M., S. I., I. R., B. T., and M. W. contributed to the methodology and provided scientific input, including critical review and revision of the manuscript. E. v. M., B. T., G. H., M. K., and A.-M. D. contributed to study conceptualization and provided scientific guidance, including critical review and revision of the manuscript. M. A. critically reviewed the manuscript. G. H., F. B., B. S., K. R., E. v. M., B. W., and M. V. K. are principal investigators of the DZL ALL Age Asthma Cohort; they secured funding and contributed to the conception and development of the overarching research goals and aims.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Data Availability

The sequence data generated and analyzed during this study have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA1499410 (reviewer link: https://dataview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/object/PRJNA1499410?reviewer=okpdiae11ucclqmiq09i436qvh). Associated sample metadata are not publicly available in order to protect participant privacy but may be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics Statement

The ALLIANCE cohort of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL) was approved by all local ethics committees of the involved centers and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (pediatric arm NCT02496468, adult arm NCT02419274). Parents of study participants aged < 18 years and study participants aged ≥ 18 years gave written informed consent.

Competing interests

S. Gschwendtner, N. Maison, S. Illi, I. Rosenboom, B. Waschki, M. Abdo, F. Brinkmann, and M. Schloter declare no competing interests.

E. von Mutius reports research support, consulting fees, travel funding, honoraria and patent-related royalties from multiple academic, governmental and commercial entities, including OM Pharma S.A., Elsevier, AstraZeneca and the European Commission.

B. Tümmler reports grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Volkswagen Stiftung, German Center for Lung Research (DZL) and German Center for Infection Research (DZIF); consulting fees from Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (HZI); honoraria for lectures and educational events from Vertex Pharmaceuticals Germany; and advisory board fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.

A.-M. Dittrich reports clinical study funding paid to her institution from Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. for the conduct of clinical studies; consulting fees from GSK, Oxford University and Novartis via the c4c consortium; and personal remuneration from Vertex Pharmaceuticals for scientific advice on textbooks and online educational materials.

M. Weckmann reports grants from the German Federal Ministry for Research, Technology and Space (BMFTR) and the German Center for Lung Research (DZL) during the conduct of the study. M. V. Kopp reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Allergopharma GmbH and Infectopharm GmbH. He also had a leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, and served as President (2018-2022) and Past president (2022-2025) of the Society of Pediatric Pulmonology (“Gesellschaft Pädiatrische Pneumologie e.V.”).

G. Hansen reports funding from the German Center for Lung Research (DZL; BMFTR) with grant payments made to Hannover Medical School, and the German Research Foundation (DFG), EXC 2155 ‘RESIST’, as well as consulting fees from Sanofi GmbH and lecture fees from MedUpdate and AbbVie.

K. F. Rabe reports receiving medical writing support from Chiesi and, within the past 36 months, consulting fees, honoraria and/or advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Sanofi & Regeneron, CSL Behring, GlaxoSmithKline, Berlin Chemie, and Menarini.

B. Schaub reports grants from the German Federal Ministry for Research, Technology and Space (BMFTR) including support through the German Center for Lung Research (DZL; CPC-Munich, grant 82DZL033C2, Combat Lung diseases FP4), the German Center for Child and Adolescent Health (DZKJ; LMU/LMU Klinikum, grant 01GL2406A), and the German Research Foundation (DFG; grants SCHA 997/8-1, SCHA 997/9-1, SCHA 997/10-1, SCHA 997/11-1 and SCHA 997/15-1). B. Schaub further reports consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, AstraZeneca and Sanofi, and honoraria and Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board participation fees from Sanofi.

Support Statement

Infrastructure support for the ALLIANCE cohort is provided by participating sites of the German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), together with affiliated study centers and hospitals. Cohort-specific costs are financed through project funding from the German Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space (BMFTR; grant no. 82DZL001A4). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of data, or writing of the manuscript.

Footnotes

Take home message

This exploratory pilot study identified greater heterogeneity of nasal bacterial profiles and descriptive gut–nasal network patterns in preschool children with recurrent wheeze, despite limited differences in overall diversity and composition.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Michael Schloter, Email: michael.schloter@helmholtz-munich.de.

the ALLIANCE Study Group:

Mira Bürk, Sybille Contento, Markus Ege, Alexander Hose, Constanze Jakwerth, Lena Lagally, Jimmy Omony, Carsten Schmidt-Weber, Lena Ullemeyer, Esther Zeitlmann, Thomas Bahmer, Heike Biller, Constantin Blanke-Roeser, Karoline I. Gaede, Wiebke Hagedorn, Nikolas Jacobs, Anne-Marie Kirsten, Inke R. König, Lea Kronziel, Gyde Nissen, Wasifa Nurieva, Frauke Pedersen, Loana Penner, Isabell Ricklefs, Silke Szymczak, Vera Veith, Henrik Watz, Christopher Wirks, Marie Bickes, Mifflin-Rae Calvero, David S. DeLuca, Svenja Gaedcke, Ruth Grychtol, Anika Habener, Christine Happle, Adan Chari Jirmo, Bin Liu, Lennart Riemann, Svenja Foth, Inga Jerrentrup, Harald Renz, Chrysanthi Skevaki, Stefanie Weber, Miguel AAlejandre Alcazar, Lena Keufken, Silke van Koningsbruggen-Rietschel, Ernst Rietschel, Tobias Trojan, and Jan-Christoph Thomassen

References

  • 1.Alhamwe BA, Potaczek DP, Miethe S et al (2021) Extracellular vesicles and asthma-more than just a co-existence. Int J Mol Sci. 10.3390/ijms22094984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Morin A, McKennan CG, Pedersen CT et al (2020) Epigenetic landscape links upper airway microbiota in infancy with allergic rhinitis at 6 years of age. J Allergy Clin Immunol 146(6):1358–1366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sencio V, Machado MG, Trottein F (2021) The lung–gut axis during viral respiratory infections: the impact of gut dysbiosis on secondary disease outcomes. Mucosal Immunol 14(2):296–304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kahhaleh FG, Barrientos G, Conrad ML (2024) The gut-lung axis and asthma susceptibility in early life. Acta Physiol 240(3):e14092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stiemsma LT, Turvey SE (2017) Asthma and the microbiome: defining the critical window in early life. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 13:3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nunez H, Nieto PA, Mars RA et al (2025) Early life gut microbiome and its impact on childhood health and chronic conditions. Gut Microbes 17(1):2463567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Depner M, Taft DH, Kirjavainen PV et al (2020) Maturation of the gut microbiome during the first year of life contributes to the protective farm effect on childhood asthma. Nat Med 26(11):1766–1775 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yatsunenko T, Rey FE, Manary MJ et al (2012) Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 486(7402):222–227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rinninella E, Raoul P, Cintoni M et al (2019) What is the healthy gut microbiota composition? A changing ecosystem across age, environment, diet, and diseases. Microorganisms. 10.3390/microorganisms7010014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Biesbroek G, Tsivtsivadze E, Sanders EA et al (2014) Early respiratory microbiota composition determines bacterial succession patterns and respiratory health in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 190(11):1283–1292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Teo SM, Mok D, Pham K et al (2015) The infant nasopharyngeal microbiome impacts severity of lower respiratory infection and risk of asthma development. Cell Host Microbe 17(5):704–715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Raita Y, Toivonen L, Schuez-Havupalo L et al (2021) Maturation of nasal microbiota and antibiotic exposures during early childhood: a population-based cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect 27(2):283.e1–283.e7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jatzlauk G, Bartel S, Heine H et al (2017) Influences of environmental bacteria and their metabolites on allergies, asthma, and host microbiota. Allergy 72(12):1859–1867 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Abrahamsson TR, Jakobsson HE, Andersson AF et al (2014) Low gut microbiota diversity in early infancy precedes asthma at school age. Clin Exp Allergy 44(6):842–850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Arrieta MC, Arévalo A, Stiemsma L et al (2018) Associations between infant fungal and bacterial dysbiosis and childhood atopic wheeze in a nonindustrialized setting. J Allergy Clin Immunol 142(2):424–34.e10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Arrieta MC, Stiemsma LT, Dimitriu PA et al (2015) Early infancy microbial and metabolic alterations affect risk of childhood asthma. Sci Transl Med. 7(307):307ra152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fujimura KE, Sitarik AR, Havstad S et al (2016) Neonatal gut microbiota associates with childhood multisensitized atopy and T cell differentiation. Nat Med 22(10):1187–1191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.van Nimwegen FA, Penders J, Stobberingh EE et al (2011) Mode and place of delivery, gastrointestinal microbiota, and their influence on asthma and atopy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 128(5):948–55.e1-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fuchs O, Bahmer T, Weckmann M et al (2018) The all age asthma cohort (ALLIANCE) - from early beginnings to chronic disease: a longitudinal cohort study. BMC Pulm Med 18(1):140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Apprill A, McNally S, Parsons R et al (2015) Minor revision to V4 region SSU rRNA 806R gene primer greatly increases detection of SAR11 bacterioplankton. Aquat Microb Ecol 75
  • 21.Parada AE, Needham DM, Fuhrman JA (2016) Every base matters: assessing small subunit rRNA primers for marine microbiomes with mock communities, time series and global field samples. Environ Microbiol 18(5):1403–1414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ et al (2016) DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13(7):581–583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Davis NM, Proctor DM, Holmes SP et al (2018) Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data. Microbiome 6(1):226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bosch AATM, Levin E, van Houten MA et al (2016) Development of upper respiratory tract microbiota in infancy is affected by mode of delivery. EBioMedicine 9:336–345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McCauley KE, DeMuri G, Lynch K et al (2021) Moraxella-dominated pediatric nasopharyngeal microbiota associate with upper respiratory infection and sinusitis. PLoS One 16(12):e0261179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Korpela K, Salonen A, Virta LJ et al (2016) Intestinal microbiome is related to lifetime antibiotic use in Finnish pre-school children. Nat Commun 7(1):10410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yassour M, Vatanen T, Siljander H et al (2016) Natural history of the infant gut microbiome and impact of antibiotic treatment on bacterial strain diversity and stability. Sci Transl Med 8(343):343ra81 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stegen JC, Lin X, Konopka AE et al (2012) Stochastic and deterministic assembly processes in subsurface microbial communities. ISME J 6(9):1653–1664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Berry D, Widder S (2014) Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting keystone species with co-occurrence networks. Front Microbiol 5:219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 30.Faust K, Raes J (2012) Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nat Rev Micro 10(8):538–550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Marsland BJ, Trompette A, Gollwitzer ES (2015) The gut-lung axis in respiratory disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc 12(Suppl 2):S150–S156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Trompette A, Gollwitzer ES, Yadava K et al (2014) Gut microbiota metabolism of dietary fiber influences allergic airway disease and hematopoiesis. Nat Med 20(2):159–166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The sequence data generated and analyzed during this study have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA1499410 (reviewer link: https://dataview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/object/PRJNA1499410?reviewer=okpdiae11ucclqmiq09i436qvh). Associated sample metadata are not publicly available in order to protect participant privacy but may be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Microbial Ecology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES