Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1993 Jan;43(366):10–14.

Comparison of the use of a dry chemistry analyser in primary care in Norway and the United Kingdom.

G Thue 1, S Sandberg 1, D G Bullock 1
PMCID: PMC1372200  PMID: 8457356

Abstract

The results of a quality assessment survey of the most commonly used dry chemistry instrument in primary care in Norway and the United Kingdom, the Reflotron (Boehringer), are reported including an evaluation of some of the operational characteristics of the Reflotron users. The primary care users in Norway taking part in the study comprised 95 occupational health care departments and 89 general practices. In the UK, primary care users taking part were 95 occupational health care departments and 37 general practices. In terms of both accuracy and precision evaluation of concentrations of bilirubin, cholesterol, gamma-glutamyl transferase, glucose, triglycerides, urea and uric acid by primary care users was similar in the two countries, and to that of 60 Norwegian laboratories. Examination of operational characteristics revealed a lack of effective quality control measures in both countries, and some differences in the pattern of usage between primary care users in Norway and the UK, especially in general practice. The result of Reflotron tests were ready before the patient left in a considerably higher proportion of general practices in the UK than in Norway. It is concluded that the Reflotron is suitable for primary care use, but good, routine quality of analysis must be ensured through collaboration between primary care users and clinical chemists.

Full text

PDF
10

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boerma G. J., Gelderland J., van Gorp I., Leijnse B. Use of the Reflotron system for cholesterol assay in capillary blood, venous blood, and serum--evaluation of accuracy and lot-to-lot reagent comparability. Clin Chem. 1988 Oct;34(10):2117–2119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boerma G. J., van Gorp I., Liem T. L., Leijnse B., Bellm J., Carstensen C. A. Revised calibration of the Reflotron cholesterol assay evaluated. Clin Chem. 1988 Jun;34(6):1124–1127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradley N., Watkins S. Survey of equipment in general practice. BMJ. 1989 Aug 12;299(6696):435–436. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6696.435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Broughton P. M., Buckley B. M. Performance requirements of tests performed nearer the patient. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1987 Apr;47(2):99–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Broughton P. M., Bullock D. G., Cramb R. Improving the quality of plasma cholesterol measurements in primary care. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 1990;198:43–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Broughton P. M., Bullock D. G., Cramb R. Quality of plasma cholesterol measurements in primary care. BMJ. 1989 Feb 4;298(6669):297–298. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6669.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Broughton P. M. Laboratory medicine in primary health care. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Jan;40(330):2–3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Broughton P. M., Thorpe G. H. Laboratory testing in, or for, general practice. Med Lab Sci. 1990 Oct;47(4):304–311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Drucker R. F., Williams D. R., Price C. P. Quality assessment of blood glucose monitors in use outside the hospital laboratory. J Clin Pathol. 1983 Aug;36(8):948–953. doi: 10.1136/jcp.36.8.948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fraser C. G. Desirable performance standards for clinical chemistry tests. Adv Clin Chem. 1983;23:299–339. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2423(08)60403-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hilton S. Near patient testing in general practice: a review. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Jan;40(330):32–36. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hjortdahl P. Bruk av laboratoriet i et kommunalt helsesenter. Analysevolum, repertoar og økonomi. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989 Apr 10;109(10):1056–1058. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hjortdahl P. The silent revolution. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1990 Dec;8(4):188–190. doi: 10.3109/02813439008994956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kinlay S. Comparison of Reflotron and laboratory cholesterol measurements. Med J Aust. 1988 Aug 1;149(3):126–129. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1988.tb120534.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Koch T. R., Mehta U., Lee H., Aziz K., Temel S., Donlon J. A., Sherwin R. Bias and precision of cholesterol analysis by physician's office analyzers. Clin Chem. 1987 Dec;33(12):2262–2267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Landaas S., Juell A. The quality of laboratory analyses in the primary health care. A proficiency survey on hemoglobin, glucose, leucocyte count and sedimentation rate (ESR) measurements. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1986 Sep;4(3):169–173. doi: 10.3109/02813438609014825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Matzen L. E., Grindsted P., Hørder M. Laboratoriemedicin i den primoere sundhedstjeneste--omfang og omkostninger. Nord Med. 1988;103(3):80–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mills K. A., Reilly P. M. Laboratory and radiological investigations in general practice. I-Type requested and rate of use. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Oct 8;287(6398):1033–1036. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6398.1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nanji A. A., Poon R., Hinberg I. Comparison of hospital staff performance when using desk top analysers for "near patient" testing. J Clin Pathol. 1988 Feb;41(2):223–225. doi: 10.1136/jcp.41.2.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Neil H. A., Cassidy D. M., Laker M. F., Alberti K. G. Within-clinic reagent strip lipid measurement. Diabet Med. 1989 Dec;6(9):824–828. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1989.tb01289.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pearson J. R., Dusenbury L. J., Bakes-Martin R., Loverde M., Johnson J., Byyny R. L. Evaluation of a simple method for measuring blood cholesterol levels using non-laboratory observers. Am J Med. 1988 Sep;85(3):369–374. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90589-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rohac M., Gabl F. Comparison of two solid phase chemistry systems: Reflotron and Ektachem DT 60. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1987 Nov;25(11):811–821. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1987.25.11.811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sandberg S., Christensen N. G., Thue G., Lund P. K. Performance of dry-chemistry instruments in primary health care. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1989 Sep;49(5):483–488. doi: 10.1080/00365518909089125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sedor F. A., Holleman C. M., Heyden S., Schneider K. A. Reflotron cholesterol measurement evaluated as a screening technique. Clin Chem. 1988 Dec;34(12):2542–2545. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Selmer R., Foss O. P., Lund-Larsen P. G. Reliability of the Reflotron in the determination of cholesterol. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1990 May;50(3):261–271. doi: 10.3109/00365519009091577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Skinner A. G., Bacon B. J., House J. D. Dry chemistry: an assessment of the BCL Reflotron system. Med Lab Sci. 1990 Oct;47(4):263–271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Smith L. A., McNaught J., Hutchison A. S. How well do nurses perform blood glucose analyses at the diabetic clinic? An assessment using the Reflotron analyser. Ann Clin Biochem. 1989 Nov;26(Pt 6):554–555. doi: 10.1177/000456328902600617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Statland B. E. A review of the analytic performance of the Reflotron System for cholesterol testing. Clin Ther. 1990 May-Jun;12(3):281–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stott N. C. Desktop laboratory technology in general practice. BMJ. 1989 Sep 2;299(6699):579–580. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6699.579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. von Schenck H., Treichl L., Tilling B., Olsson A. G. Laboratory and field evaluation of three desktop instruments for assay of cholesterol and triglyceride. Clin Chem. 1987 Jul;33(7):1230–1232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES