Abstract
Variations in standards are found in all health services. The method and amount of funding are thought to be important reasons for these variations. A cross sectional survey of all general practices in three counties in south west England was undertaken in order to explain variations in the level of development. A development score for each practice was calculated. There was wide variation in standards as described by the level of development. Multiple regression analysis showed that being a training practice, having a practice manager, the partners having a younger mean age, a larger total number of patients registered with the practice and a lower Jarman underprivileged area score were all independently related to a higher level of practice development. In addition, the responsible family health services authority was also related to the level of development. A combination of professional factors such as the decision to become a training practice, environmental factors such as the family health services authority or the underprivileged area score and economic factors reflected in the total list size determine the level of practice development. The most easily corrected factor is the employment of a practice manager. It is suggested that differences in standards in general practice may be increased rather than decreased by the fundholding scheme.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Baker R. Comparison of standards in training and non-training practices. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985 Jul;35(276):330–332. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawrence M., Coulter A., Jones L. A total audit of preventive procedures in 45 practices caring for 430,000 patients. BMJ. 1990 Jun 9;300(6738):1501–1503. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6738.1501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leese B., Bosanquet N. High and low incomes in general practice. BMJ. 1989 Apr 8;298(6678):932–934. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6678.932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]