Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1993 Apr;43(369):169–171.

Advance directives: partnership and practicalities. Institute of Medical Ethics Working Party on the Ethics of Prolonging Life and Assisting Death.

PMCID: PMC1372363  PMID: 8323805

Abstract

When patients are no longer able to participate effectively in decision making, an advance directive or living will may assist clinicians faced with choices about whether or not to prolong their lives. But living wills are an imperfect substitute for active patient participation. The opinion of an informed proxy could help to interpret what a patient's wishes might have been in the light of his or her present condition and its possible treatment. Practical suggestions are made about informal arrangements whereby general practitioners might help to make such an opinion available when needed.

Full text

PDF
169

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Van Der Maas P. J., Van Delden J. J., Pijnenborg L., Looman C. W. Euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life. Lancet. 1991 Sep 14;338(8768):669–674. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91241-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Wolf S. M., Boyle P., Callahan D., Fins J. J., Jennings B., Nelson J. L., Barondess J. A., Brock D. W., Dresser R., Emanuel L. Sources of concern about the Patient Self-Determination Act. N Engl J Med. 1991 Dec 5;325(23):1666–1671. doi: 10.1056/nejm199112053252334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES