Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1993 Aug;43(373):327–330.

Why do general practitioners recognize major depression in one woman patient yet miss it in another?

A T Tylee 1, P Freeling 1, S Kerry 1
PMCID: PMC1372557  PMID: 8251216

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish whether psychiatric patient characteristics and the presence of physical illness affected general practitioners' recognition of major depressive illness in women patients. The 30-item general health questionnaire was used as a first stage screening instrument for psychiatric morbidity and each patient selected was interviewed, usually within three days of consulting their general practitioner, using the combined clinical interview. A sample of 72 women with major depressive disorder was obtained from patients consulting 36 general practitioners mainly from the south west Thames region of England, each general practitioner providing one patient he or she had correctly recognized as being depressed and one patient whose depression had not been recognized. Few differences were found between the groups with recognized and unrecognized depression in their psychiatric or physical features. More patients with unrecognized depression experienced physical illness and were tired. Patients with serious physical disease were five times more likely not to be recognized as depressed than those without physical disease. Patients with recognized depression described a more distinct quality to their depressed mood. Women with unrecognized major depression are similar to those women whose major depression is recognized by their general practitioner. These findings require further elaboration by process and content analysis of the women's consultations.

Full text

PDF
327

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CARNEY M. W., ROTH M., GARSIDE R. F. THE DIAGNOSIS OF DEPRESSIVE SYNDROMES AND THE PREDICTION OF E.C.T. RESPONSE. Br J Psychiatry. 1965 Aug;111:659–674. doi: 10.1192/bjp.111.477.659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Freeling P., Rao B. M., Paykel E. S., Sireling L. I., Burton R. H. Unrecognised depression in general practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Jun 22;290(6485):1880–1883. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goldberg D. P., Cooper B., Eastwood M. R., Kedward H. B., Shepherd M. A standardized psychiatric interview for use in community surveys. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1970 Feb;24(1):18–23. doi: 10.1136/jech.24.1.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hamilton M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1967 Dec;6(4):278–296. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1967.tb00530.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hankin J. R., Locke B. Z. Extent of depressive symptomatology among patients seeking care in a prepaid group practice. Psychol Med. 1983 Feb;13(1):121–129. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700050121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hollyman J. A., Freeling P., Paykel E. S., Bhat A., Sedgwick P. Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of amitriptyline among depressed patients in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988 Sep;38(314):393–397. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Marks J. N., Goldberg D. P., Hillier V. F. Determinants of the ability of general practitioners to detect psychiatric illness. Psychol Med. 1979 May;9(2):337–353. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700030853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nielsen A. C., 3rd, Williams T. A. Prevalence by Self-report questionnaire and recognition by nonpsychiatric physicians. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1980 Sep;37(9):999–1004. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780220037003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Paykel E. S., Hollyman J. A., Freeling P., Sedgwick P. Predictors of therapeutic benefit from amitriptyline in mild depression: a general practice placebo-controlled trial. J Affect Disord. 1988 Jan-Feb;14(1):83–95. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(88)90075-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Paykel E. S. The clinical interview for depression. Development, reliability and validity. J Affect Disord. 1985 Jul;9(1):85–96. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(85)90014-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Raskin A., Schulterbrandt J. G., Reatig N., McKeon J. J. Differential response to chlorpromazine, imipramine, and placebo. A study of subgroups of hospitalized depressed patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1970 Aug;23(2):164–173. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1970.01750020068009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schulberg H. C., McClelland M. A conceptual model for educating primary care providers in the diagnosis and treatment of depression. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1987 Jan;9(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(87)90094-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sireling L. I., Freeling P., Paykel E. S., Rao B. M. Depression in general practice: clinical features and comparison with out-patients. Br J Psychiatry. 1985 Aug;147:119–126. doi: 10.1192/bjp.147.2.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sireling L. I., Paykel E. S., Freeling P., Rao B. M., Patel S. P. Depression in general practice: case thresholds and diagnosis. Br J Psychiatry. 1985 Aug;147:113–119. doi: 10.1192/bjp.147.2.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Spitzer R. L., Endicott J., Robins E. Research diagnostic criteria: rationale and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1978 Jun;35(6):773–782. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770300115013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tylee A., Freeling P. Consultation analysis by triggers and symptoms (CATS). A new objective technique for studying consultations. Fam Pract. 1987 Dec;4(4):260–265. doi: 10.1093/fampra/4.4.260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zung W. W., King R. E. Identification and treatment of masked depression in a general medical practice. J Clin Psychiatry. 1983 Oct;44(10):365–368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zung W. W., Magill M., Moore J. T., George D. T. Recognition and treatment of depression in a family medicine practice. J Clin Psychiatry. 1983 Jan;44(1):3–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES