Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1993 Oct;43(375):430–434.

Summative assessment: a pilot project in the west of Scotland.

L M Campbell 1, J G Howie 1, T S Murray 1
PMCID: PMC1372591  PMID: 8260223

Abstract

In the autumn of 1991 the Committee in General Practice of the west of Scotland region appointed a working party to investigate the possibility of developing a credible, valid and reliable programme of summative assessment for general practitioner trainees. The working group formulated a four-part package consisting of a multiple true-false paper, a trainee audit project, the trainers' judgement, and analysis of videotaped consultations. The reasons for the use of this selection of methods are discussed. It is suggested that a summative assessment process for trainees should make use of the trainers' considerable knowledge of the trainee, have an external component, be criterion referenced, have an element of continuous assessment, and involve direct assessment of clinical competence. A pilot study of assessment of clinical competence using videotapes of routine trainee consultations by 25 volunteer general practitioner assessors is described. A rating instrument for use in differentiating the competent from the not yet competent trainee is discussed. The working group and the group of videotape assessors came to the provisional conclusion that the use of videotaped consultations may be a valid and feasible method of assessing the competence of general practitioner trainees as part of a balanced summative assessment programme.

Full text

PDF
430

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Campbell L. M., Murray T. S. Trainee assessment--a regional survey. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Dec;40(341):507–509. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Godlee F. MRCGP: examining the exam. BMJ. 1991 Jul 27;303(6796):235–238. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6796.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hannay D. R. Postgraduate examinations for general practice in Canada and the United Kingdom. Lancet. 1979 Jul 7;2(8132):28–30. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)90187-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Harden R. M., Gleeson F. A. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Med Educ. 1979 Jan;13(1):41–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hays R. B. Assessment of general practice consultations: content validity of a rating scale. Med Educ. 1990 Mar;24(2):110–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1990.tb02508.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Martin E., Martin P. M. The reactions of patients to a video camera in the consulting room. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 Nov;34(268):607–610. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Millar T., Goldberg D. P. Link between the ability to detect and manage emotional disorders: a study of general practitioner trainees. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Sep;41(350):357–359. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mulholland H., Tombleson P. M. Assessment of the general practitioner. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Jun;40(335):252–254. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rabinowitz H. K. The modified essay question: an evaluation of its use in a family medicine clerkship. Med Educ. 1987 Mar;21(2):114–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb00676.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Roberts J., Freeman J. Entry to general practice training. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Dec 3;287(6406):1677–1679. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6406.1677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Walker R., Walker B. Use of the objective structured clinical examination for assessment of vocational trainees for general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Mar;37(296):123–124. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES