Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2026 Sep 29;14(11):e01751-26. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01751-26

Bridging a genetic gap with new tools to study the metabolism, fitness, and virulence in Burkholderia cenocepacia

Silvia Buroni 1,✉
Editor: Varsha Singh2
PMCID: PMC13729092  PMID: 42808737

ABSTRACT

Burkholderia cenocepacia is a formidable opportunistic pathogen, particularly in individuals with cystic fibrosis, yet its study has long been hampered by limited availability of genetic tools due to its high intrinsic antibiotic resistance. A recent study by M. M. Noe, K. Meesilpavikkai, Y. Ajimathorn, A. Sawatpanich, et al. (Microbiol Spectr 14:e02492-25, 2026, https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02492-25) addresses this bottleneck by adapting a unified trimethoprim-selectable toolkit for markerless gene deletion and site-specific chromosomal complementation. By applying these tools to the purM gene, the authors demonstrate that while purM is universally essential for de novo purine biosynthesis, its role in intracellular survival is strain-dependent. These findings highlight the metabolic heterogeneity within the Burkholderia cepacia complex and provide a robust methodological framework for future functional genomics to help elucidate the metabolism, fitness, and virulence of these important bacteria. This commentary discusses how these advancements simplify complex genetic workflows and open new avenues for investigating the metabolic determinants of Burkholderia pathogenesis and fitness.

KEYWORDS: Burkholderia cenocepacia, genetic tools, metabolism

COMMENTARY

The genus Burkholderia encompasses a diverse array of species with lifestyles ranging from beneficial plant-associated mutualists to devastating human pathogens. Among these, Burkholderia cenocepacia is of particular medical interest, being a critical threat to immunocompromised patients and people with cystic fibrosis because it is capable of causing the so-called “cepacia syndrome”—a life-threatening condition marked by rapid pulmonary decline and sepsis. Despite its clinical importance, the molecular tools available to dissect B. cenocepacia features are very difficult to establish. This is mainly due to its large, multi-replicon genome and extensive multidrug resistance profile (1), which often make standard genetic selection markers difficult to use. In this context, the paper by Noe et al. (2) represents a significant advance, taking advantage of Burkholderia susceptibility to trimethoprim to enable precise, markerless genetic manipulation and complementation.

AN EXPANDED TOOLKIT FOR A CHALLENGING PATHOGEN

The primary difficulty in B. cenocepacia genetics stems from its notable drug resistance. Most common antibiotics fail to provide the high-stringency selection required for allelic exchange or transposon-based complementation. Although previous successful systems have been developed to study Burkholderia genetics (3–7), the system adapted by Noe et al. utilizes a single selection marker—trimethoprim—for both the pEDL1005 vector, set up to create markerless gene deletion, and the mini-Tn7-based complementation system. This approach significantly simplifies cloning procedures and avoids the use of multiple resistance cassettes, which can cause polar effects or limit future genetic studies. Moreover, the use of the mini-Tn7 system (pUC18T-mini-Tn7T-TMP) allows for stable chromosomal complementation downstream of glmS homologs and, together with an established PCR-based strategy to verify the site-specific transposon insertion, greatly contributes to improving the genetic toolkit available for this pathogen.

Importantly, the study emphasizes the need for strain-aware optimization, as previously reported (8). For instance, the authors found that sacB-mediated counterselection required different sucrose concentrations for the reference strain K56-2 (20%) versus the clinical isolate SCBC075 (25%), although with different yields. This observation must be kept in mind when working with difficult-to-handle microorganisms: even within a single species, physiological and genomic heterogeneity can dictate the success of molecular tools.

BURKHOLDERIA METABOLIC HETEROGENEITY AND PATHOGENESIS

The choice of purM (encoding phosphoribosylaminoimidazole synthetase) provides a proof of concept for studying the metabolism of Burkholderia, especially in relation to intracellular survival. The authors confirmed that purM is essential for de novo purine biosynthesis, as ΔpurM mutants in both tested strains were strict adenine auxotrophs. This aligns with findings in the closely related pathogen Burkholderia pseudomallei, where purine limitation in the host environment often renders such mutants avirulent (9).

In contrast, the study reveals once more a fascinating divergence in different B. cenocepacia strains regarding intracellular survival. Indeed, while the ΔpurM mutant of the reference strain K56-2 showed significant defects in early intracellular adaptation within macrophages, the clinical isolate SCBC075 remained fully competent despite its auxotrophy. This suggests that SCBC075 may possess superior purine salvage pathways or more efficient mechanisms for acquiring host-derived nucleotides. This strain-dependent metabolic flexibility underscores that virulence determinants are not monolithic and must be evaluated across diverse genetic backgrounds to understand the pathogenic potential of each strain.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

The establishment of the genetic toolkit presented by Noe et al. (2) paves the way for deepening our knowledge of Burkholderia strains by providing:

  1. High-throughput functional genomics: The efficiency of the pEDL1005 and mini-Tn7 systems could be scaled to systematically target metabolic, regulatory, and virulence networks in Burkholderia to elucidate fitness and pathogenic pathways not yet completely explored.

  2. Refined complementation strategies: This study identified a preference for insertion at the glmS3 locus in K56-2; however, further work is needed to determine if this is the case in other Burkholderia species and whether the insertion site influences the expression levels of complemented genes.

In conclusion, the work by Noe et al. provides the Burkholderia community with a robust, versatile, and much-needed molecular toolkit. By lowering the technical barriers to genetic manipulation and highlighting the metabolic diversity of B. cenocepacia, this research facilitates a new era of functional studies aimed at uncovering therapeutic targets for this recalcitrant pathogen.

The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal or of ASM.

Contributor Information

Silvia Buroni, Email: silvia.buroni@unipv.it.

Varsha Singh, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Data will be made publicly available upon publication.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Mahenthiralingam E, Urban TA, Goldberg JB. 2005. The multifarious, multireplicon Burkholderia cepacia complex. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:144–156. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Noe MM, Meesilpavikkai K, Ajimathorn Y, Sawatpanich A, Saninjuk K, Sermswan RW, Chirakul S. 2026. Functional analysis of purM in Burkholderia cenocepacia using a trimethoprim-selectable allelic exchange and mini-Tn7 complementation approach. Microbiol Spectr 14:e02492-25. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02492-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Flannagan RS, Linn T, Valvano MA. 2008. A system for the construction of targeted unmarked gene deletions in the genus Burkholderia. Environ Microbiol 10:1652–1660. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01576.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Hamad MA, Skeldon AM, Valvano MA. 2010. Construction of aminoglycoside-sensitive Burkholderia cenocepacia strains for use in studies of intracellular bacteria with the gentamicin protection assay. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:3170–3176. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03024-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Fazli M, Harrison JJ, Gambino M, Givskov M, Tolker-Nielsen T. 2015. In-frame and unmarked gene deletions in Burkholderia cenocepacia via an allelic exchange system compatible with gateway technology. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:3623–3630. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03909-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Yap ZL, Rahman ASMZ, Hogan AM, Levin DB, Cardona ST. 2024. A CRISPR-Cas-associated transposon system for genome editing in Burkholderia cepacia complex species. Appl Environ Microbiol 90:e00699-24. doi: 10.1128/aem.00699-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Scoffone VC, Trespidi G, Barbieri G, Irudal S, Israyilova A, Buroni S. 2021. Methodological tools to study species of the genus Burkholderia. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105:9019–9034. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11667-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Logue C-A, Peak IRA, Beacham IR. 2009. Facile construction of unmarked deletion mutants in Burkholderia pseudomallei using sacB counter-selection in sucrose-resistant and sucrose-sensitive isolates. J Microbiol Methods 76:320–323. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Propst KL, Mima T, Choi KH, Dow SW, Schweizer HP. 2010. A Burkholderia pseudomallei ΔpurM mutant is avirulent in immunocompetent and immunodeficient animals: candidate strain for exclusion from select-agent lists. Infect Immun 78:3136–3143. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01313-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made publicly available upon publication.


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES