Skip to main content
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy logoLink to Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
. 2026 Nov 3;81(12):dkag355. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkag355

Understanding integrase inhibitor resistance in Angola: a comparative analysis of INSTI-naive and INSTI-experienced individuals

Bárbara Pocongo 1,2, Maria Furtado 3, Cláudia Bernardi 4, Lucrécia Jacinto 5, Aulória José 6, Jaime Urica 7, Rosa Torres 8, Francisco Vunge 9, Beatriz Almeida 10, Michael R Jordan 11,12, Carlos Jesus 13, Monick Lindenmeyer Guimarães 14, Cíntia Mayumi Ahagon 15, Giselle Lopes 16, Luís Brígido 17, Seth Inzaule 18, Ana B Abecasis 19, Ricardo Parreira 20, João Piedade 21, Victor Pimentel 22,✉
PMCID: PMC13729367  PMID: 42975147

Abstract

Background

Africa remains a major epicentre of the global HIV epidemic, with Central Africa exhibiting extensive HIV-1 genetic diversity that may influence the emergence and transmission of drug resistance mutations. Following World Health Organization recommendations, Angola initiated the national transition to dolutegravir (DTG)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) in 2021. This study evaluated the frequency, patterns and temporal trends of HIV-1 drug resistance mutations before and after DTG implementation (2019–23), while also characterizing HIV-1 genetic diversity across Angolan provinces outside Luanda.

Methods

A retrospective observational analytical study comparing pre- and post-Integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) introduction periods was conducted using plasma samples and dried blood spot cards from 17 provinces of Angola.

Results

Of the 201 samples analysed, 102 were successfully sequenced for at least one coding region [protease (n = 65); reverse transcriptase (n = 66); integrase (IN) (n = 86)], comprising 48 INSTI-naive people living with HIV and 54 INSTI-experienced people living with HIV samples. Subtype C was the most prevalent (21.6%), followed by unique recombinant forms (20.6%), A1 (15.7%), F1 (13.7%), CRF02_AG (10.8%), G (8.8%) and other subtypes or recombinants (8.8%). Resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors was the most common (68.2%; 95% CI 56.2–78.2), followed by nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (48.5%; 95% CI 36.8–60.3). Resistance to protease inhibitors (PIs) and INSTIs was lower, observed in 1.5% (95% CI 0.3–8.2) and 3.5% (95% CI 1.2–9.8), respectively.

Conclusions

In this analysis, substantial HIV-1 genetic and epidemiological complexity was observed. In the context of the rapid scale-up of DTG-based ART, continued surveillance of INSTI resistance mutations has become increasingly important to inform evidence-based public health strategies aimed at preventing the transmission of drug-resistant HIV strains and optimizing ART regimens at the population level.

Introduction

Advances in antiretroviral therapy (ART) have enabled people living with HIV (PLHIV) to enjoy longer life expectancy and an improved quality of life. Despite these advances, the ongoing development of more robust and durable drug regimens remains critical to avoid the long-term risk of drug resistance and treatment failure.1

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are a class of antiretroviral drugs that inhibit the viral cDNA strand transfer reaction catalysed by HIV INT, thereby preventing retroviral integration into the host genome. The introduction of INSTIs into ART regimens has transformed the clinical management of HIV-1 infection. Among these agents, dolutegravir (DTG) stands out for its potent antiviral activity, high genetic barrier to resistance and favourable safety profile.2 In 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended a DTG-based regimen as the preferred first-line therapy in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where high levels of resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) had compromised treatment efficacy.2 However, HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) remains an emerging threat to the long-term success of HIV treatment programmes and epidemic control.3,4

Africa remains a key epicentre of the global HIV epidemic, and Central Africa harbours remarkable genetic diversity of viral subtypes.5 This diversity may influence the emergence and patterns of resistance mutations, emphasizing the need for region-specific molecular surveillance.2,6

Angola implemented free ART in 2004 as part of its national HIV response strategy, achieving an estimated ART coverage of 48%, corresponding to approximately 180 000 PLHIV.7 Despite progress, this level of coverage remains below the regional average for sub-Saharan Africa, reflecting persistent challenges in healthcare access and ART distribution.8,9 ART coverage in Angola remains suboptimal due to regional disparities, economic instability and interruptions in drug supply, while low adherence to ART further contributes to virological failure and may accelerate the emergence of HIV drug-resistant variants.10–12 Following WHO recommendations, Angola initiated the national transition to DTG-based ART in 2021.13

This study aims to evaluate the frequency, patterns and temporal trends of HIV-1 drug resistance mutations (DRMs) among adult and paediatric patients receiving ART in Angola before and after the national introduction of DTG-based regimens (2019–23) and to characterize the genetic diversity of HIV-1 across provinces outside Luanda, where surveillance of INT inhibitor resistance remains scarce.

Materials and methods

Study design and setting

A retrospective observational analytical study comparing pre- and post-INSTI introduction periods was conducted using plasma samples and dried blood spot (DBS) cards from 17 provinces of Angola. The selected samples, collected between 2019 and 2023, were stored at the Molecular Biology Reference Laboratory of the National Institute for the Fight Against AIDS in Luanda. A convenience sample of 201 specimens (134 DBS and 67 plasma) used for routine viral load tests from individuals receiving ART with viral non-suppression (viral load >1000 copies/mL) was analysed. The samples were categorized into two groups according to INSTI treatment exposure: 92 samples for INSTI-naive PLHIV (INP) and 109 samples for INSTI-experienced PLHIV (IEP). Individuals younger than 15 years old were considered children, whereas those aged 15 years and older were considered adults.

Extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing of HIV-1 RNA and DNA

Viral RNA was extracted from plasma and DBS samples using the QIAamp® Viral RNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription of the extracted RNA was performed following a previously described protocol.14,15

Two rounds of nested PCR were performed to amplify the HIV-1 pol gene regions comprehending protease/reverse transcriptase (PR/RT; HXB2 positions 2253–3353) and INT (HXB2 positions 4239–5096) coding sequences. The resulting nested-PCR products were analysed by 1% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis, purified using the Wizard® SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and subsequently sequenced using the Sanger sequencing method with specific primers, as previously described.14,15 Sequencing was performed using an ABI 3730xl automated sequencer with the BigDye® Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Madison, WI, USA).

Analysis of HIV-1 genetic diversity and profile of resistance mutations

The generated FASTA sequence files were processed using RECALL v2.5 software16 for sequence assembly and editing. HIV-1 subtype classification was performed using the COMET subtyping tool.17 DRMs were identified using the Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance Database (HIVdb) v10.1 (https://hivdb.stanford.edu/).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics v29 (IBM Corp., USA). Quantitative variables were summarized using descriptive statistics, including sample size (n) and median with interquartile range (IQR; 25th–75th percentiles). Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and proportions and compared using the Fisher’s exact test. Statistical significance was defined as a P value <0.05 for all analyses.

Ethical approval

This study was conducted in accordance with ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects and received formal approval from the Ethics Committee of the Angolan Ministry of Health No. 039/CEM/2023. All procedures involving human samples were performed following the guidelines and regulations established by the Committee to ensure the protection of participants’ rights, confidentiality and safety.

Results

Out of the 201 participants enrolled, 42 (20.9%) were children and 159 (79.1%) were adults. The median age was 34.0 years (IQR 18–42.5) and 76.6% were female; 92 (45.8%) samples were from INPs, while the remainder 109 (54.2%) were from IEPs; 59.7% of the samples were from the northern region of Angola (Luanda, Malanje, Cuanza Norte, Cabinda, Uíge and Zaire provinces), 21.4% from the central-southern region (Bié, Huambo, Cuanza Sul, Benguela, Cunene, Huíla, Namibe and Cuando-Cubango provinces) and 18.9% from the eastern region (Lunda Norte, Lunda Sul and Moxico provinces). The average HIV-1 RNA load in the samples analysed was 5.50 log10 copies/mL (Table 1).

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics of the population

Independent variable n (%) Treatment status Independent variable n (%) Treatment status
INP (%) IEP (%) P value INP (%) IEP (%) P value
Overall sequenced samples 201 (100) 92 (45.8) 109 (54.2) Amplified samples 102 (100) 48 (47.1) 54 (52.9)
Age, years, median (IQR) 34 (18–42.5) 33 (15–40.7) 36 (19.5–43.5) Age, years, median (IQR) 38 (18–42.5) 38 (15–40.7) 38 (19.5–43.5)
<15 years 42 (20.9) 23 (54.8) 19 (45.2) 0.189 <15 years 21 (20.6) 12 (57.1) 9 (42.9) 0.152
>15 years 159 (79.1) 69 (43.4) 90 (56.6) >15 years 81 (79.4) 36 (44.4) 45 (55.6)
Male 47 (23.4) 21 (44.7) 26 (55.3) 0.864 Male 28 (27.5) 15 (53.6) 13 (46.4) 0.467
Female 154 (76.6) 71 (46.1) 83 (53.9) Female 74 (72.5) 33 (44.6) 41 (55.4)
VL, media, Log10 201 (5.50) 92 (5.43) 109 (5.46) VL, media, Log10 102 (5.65) 48 (5.65) 54 (5.58)
VL <5 Log10 45 (22.4) 22 (48.9) 23 (51.1) 0.882 VL <5 Log10 11 (10.8) 9 (81.8) 2 (18.2) <0.0001
VL >5 Log10 156 (77.6) 69 (44.2) 87 (55.8) VL >5 Log10 91 (89.2) 39 (42.9) 52 (57.1)
Northern region 120 (59.7) 52 (43.3) 68 (56.7) 0.095 Northern region 70 (68.6) 28 (40) 42 (60) 0.043
Central southern region 43 (21.4) 22 (51.1) 21 (48.8) Central southern region 23 (22.5) 15 (65.2) 8 (34.8)
Eastern region 38 (18.9) 18 (47.3) 20 (52.6) Eastern region 9 (8.82) 5 (55.6) 4 (44.4)

IEP, INSTI-experienced PLHIV; INP, INSTI-naive PLHIV; IQR, (25–75 percentiles); VL, viral load.

Of the 201 samples analysed, 102 (54 plasma and 48 DBS) were successfully sequenced for at least one coding region [PR (n = 65); RT (n = 66); IN (n = 86)], and 50 samples amplified across the three regions, comprising 48 INP and 54 IEP samples (Table 1). Overall, Subtype C was the most prevalent subtype (21.6%), followed by unique recombinant forms (URFs; 20.6%), A1 (15.7%), F1 (13.7%), CRF02_AG (10.8%), G (8.8%) and other subtypes or recombinants (8.8%). Resistance to NNRTIs was most common (68.2%; 95% CI 56.2–78.2), followed by NRTIs (48.5%; 95% CI 36.8–60.3). Resistance to PIs and INSTIs was lower, observed in 1.5% (95% CI 0.3–8.2) and 3.5% (95% CI 1.2–9.8), respectively (Figure 1a and b). The prevalence of resistance-associated mutations differed between groups, with higher frequencies observed in INP compared to IEP, for NNRTIs (76.3% versus 57.1%; P = 0.09) and NRTIs (65.7% versus 25.0%; P = 0.001), while INSTI resistance was low in both groups (5.3% versus 3.6%; P = 0.74). PI resistance was observed only in IEP (3.6%). Analysing the two groups, the most prevalent NNRTI mutations were K103N/S/T (40.9%), G190A/E (19.7%) and E138A/G (12.1%), while NRTI mutations were M184V (37.9%), K70R/E/Q (7.6%) and T215Y/F/S/V (6.1%). INSTI major mutations were rare (G140R, Q148H and R263K; 1.2% each; Figure 1c), and PI mutations included I54V and V82A (1.5% each; Figure 1d).

Figure 1.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

HIV-1 drug resistance in adults and children with viral non-suppression. The figure summarizes: (a) The prevalence of HIV drug resistance according to antiretroviral drug class. (b) The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each drug class group. (c) The INSTI resistance prevalence and the corresponding 95% CI. (d) The frequency and prevalence of major DRM detected by class.

Among INP, NNRTI resistance mutations were more frequent than in IEP, particularly K103N/S/T (39.5% versus 18.5%; P < 0.0001) and G190A/E (18.7% versus 5.6%; P = 0.038), both demonstrating statistically significant differences, whereas E138A/G (10.4% versus 3.7%; P = 0.181) did not show statistical significance. A similar pattern was observed for NRTI-associated mutations, which were more common in INP, notably M184V (47.7% versus 5.6%; P < 0.0001) and L74V/I (12.5% versus 1.9%; P = 0.033), both statistically significant, while K70R/Q/E (12.5% versus 3.7%; P = 0.098) was not statistically significant. Regarding INSTI resistance, major mutations G140R and Q148H were identified in INP (both 2.1%), whereas R263K (1.9%) was detected exclusively in IEP. Due to their low frequency, no statistically significant comparisons could be made with these mutations. In contrast, PI-associated resistance mutations were observed only in the IEP group (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

HIV-1 drug mutation prevalence by treatment group. The figure illustrates the comparison of the prevalence of resistance-associated mutation detected in the PR, RT and INT regions among INP and IEP, highlighting the similarities and differences in mutations patterns between the two groups.

For the patients with INSTI DRM, among INP, the samples were from two female adults, aged 33 and 46 years old. Both patients were from provinces located in the northern region of Angola: one from Luanda and the other from Malanje. The 46-year-old patient initiated ART in 2011 and had a documented history of exposure to both NRTI- and NNRTI-based regimens. For the 33-year-old patient, the date of ART initiation and information regarding previous ART regimens were not available. At the time of sample collection, both participants were receiving the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate + lamivudine + efavirenz (TDF + 3TC + EFV) regimen. The IEP was a 19-year-old male adult from Luanda, also in the northern region of Angola. ART was initiated in 2019, and the available treatment history indicated previous exposure to NRTI, NNRTI, and PIs. At the time of specimen collection, he was receiving a DTG-based regimen (TDF + 3TC + DTG). Collectively, the available clinical and demographic data indicated that all tree patients were adults from northern Angola. Overall, among the three patients successful amplification of the INT region was achieved, while amplification of the PR/RT regions was achieved only in the second INP, and the analysis identified the NRTI-associated mutation K70R, as well as the NNRTI-associated mutations A98G, K101E, E138A and G190A. No PI-associated drug resistance was detected in the analysed protease region.

When comparing DRMs between adults and children, a higher prevalence of NNRTI-associated mutations was observed among children. Specifically, mutations E138A (19.0% versus 4.9%; P = 0.03), Y188L/H (14.3% versus 2.5%; P = 0.02) and Y181C (9.5% versus 1.2%; P = 0.04) were significantly more frequent in the paediatric population compared with adults. Similarly, NRTI-associated mutations were more prevalent among children. This difference was particularly notable for M184V (42.8% versus 20.9%; P = 0.03). Mutations L74V/I (9.5% versus 4.9%; P = 0.42) and Y115F (4.8% versus 0%; P = 0.04) were also detected more frequently in children, although the difference for L74V/I did not show statistical significance. In contrast, major INSTI resistance mutations were identified exclusively in adults, including G140R, R263K and Q148H, each occurring at a frequency of 1.2% (P = 0.60). Regarding PI-associated resistance mutations, V82A and I54V (4.8%; P = 0.04) were observed only in the paediatric group (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

HIV-1 drug mutation prevalence by age group. The figure illustrates the comparison of the prevalence of resistance-associated mutation detected in the PR, RT and INT regions among adult and paediatric patients, highlighting the similarities and differences in mutations patterns between the two age groups.

Discussion

Understanding the molecular epidemiology of HIV is essential for characterizing viral diversity, monitoring transmission dynamics and informing effective public health interventions. In Angola, however, the current knowledge of HIV genetic diversity and distribution remains limited and geographically uneven. Most previous studies have analysed samples collected in Luanda and a small number of provinces in the country’s central-south region, resulting in a limited representation of the national epidemic.18–21 Consequently, the broader molecular landscape of HIV circulating across Angola has not been comprehensively characterized. This lack of geographically representative data constrains our understanding of the distribution and dynamics of circulating viral subtypes and recombinant forms, the prevalence and transmission patterns of DRMs and the epidemiological processes underlying HIV dissemination in the country, limiting the development of evidence-based public health strategies tailored to the Angolan context. In this perspective, the present study aims to contribute to a more representative characterization of HIV genetic diversity, the prevalence of DRMs and the molecular epidemiology of HIV.

In this study, we analysed a cohort of 201 ART-experienced individuals with a median age of 34.0 years, of whom 76.6% were female. This demographic profile is consistent with findings from the Survey of Multiple Health Indicators, which indicate that women aged 15–49 years represent the population most affected by HIV infection in Angola.22

The HIV epidemic in the country is characterized by substantial genetic diversity, reflecting a complex molecular epidemiological landscape marked by the co-circulation of multiple subtypes and recombinant forms.18,19,23 Our results show that Subtype C was the most prevalent variant (21.6%), followed by URFs (20.6%), A1 (15.7%), F1 (13.7%), CRF02_AG (10.8%), G (8.8%) and others subtypes and recombinant forms with 8.8% of the analysed sequences. This distribution is consistent with previous studies conducted in the country.21,23 The predominance of Subtype C reflects the broader epidemiological pattern observed across southern Africa, where this subtype represents the most widely circulating lineage, particularly in countries such as South Africa, Botswana and Zambia.24,25 The high proportion of recombinant forms observed in this study likely reflects the long-standing co-circulation of multiple HIV-1 lineages in the region, which creates favourable conditions for viral recombination. Such genetic complexity has been reported previously in central and southern Africa and may contribute to the ongoing emergence of novel recombinant variants.26 From a public health perspective, this extensive viral diversity highlights the importance of sustained molecular surveillance to better understand transmission dynamics, monitor the emergence of new recombinant strains and assess their potential implications for treatment response and resistance development.24

For many years, first-line ART regimens in Angola relied predominantly on combinations of NRTIs and NNRTIs. Although widely used, NNRTI-based regimens are characterized by a relatively low genetic barrier to resistance, which may facilitate the rapid emergence and accumulation of DRMs, particularly in settings of incomplete viral suppression or suboptimal adherence.27 In this context, the high prevalence of DRMs to NNRTIs (68.2%) and NRTIs (48.5%) observed among both adults and children in the present study is consistent with previous reports.20,21,28 When comparing DRMs associated with NNRTIs and NRTIs, a higher prevalence is observed among paediatric populations. This pattern can probably be attributable to prior exposure to antiretrovirals administered for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission, which can select resistant viral variants early in life. However, the absence of comprehensive clinical data for the paediatric cohort limits the ability to substantiate this hypothesis and constitutes a key limitation of the study. Additionally, suboptimal adherence, age-specific pharmacokinetic variability and challenges in achieving appropriate dosing in children may further contribute to the emergence and persistence of resistance mutations in this population.29,30 The prevalence of DRMs also differed significantly between groups, with INP exhibiting higher frequencies compared to IEP. Evidence indicates that the prevalence of NRTI-associated resistance mutations can decline over time, reflecting both the natural reversion of archived mutations in the absence of selective pressure and the continued ability of NRTIs to suppress viral replication and prevent the emergence of new mutations.31,32 Furthermore, the introduction of INSTIs, particularly second-generation ones, has been associated with a marked reduction in the acquisition of additional NRTI and NNRTI mutations.33–36

The most frequently observed NNRTI-associated mutations (K103N/S/T, G190A/E and E138A/G) and NRTI-associated mutations (M184V, K70E/Q/R and T215F/S/V/Y) are consistent with the selective pressure exerted by previous antiretroviral regimens used in the country, particularly those including tenofovir, zidovudine, lamivudine, nevirapine and efavirenz. Specifically, K103N/S and G190A are well known to confer high-level resistance to nevirapine and efavirenz, while M184V is associated with high-level resistance to lamivudine and emtricitabine, as well as reduced viral fitness. Additionally, thymidine analogue-associated mutations such as K70R and T215Y are associated with prior exposure to zidovudine and contribute to reduced susceptibility to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.37,38

Angola initiated the national transition to DTG-based ART in 2021.13 This policy shift was implemented to improve treatment durability, enhance tolerability and increase the genetic barrier to resistance compared with previously used regimens. Based on this, the low prevalence of resistance-associated mutations to INSTIs observed in our cohort (3.5%) supports the effectiveness of this strategy and is consistent with the current WHO recommendations that endorse DTG-based regimens as the preferred first-line therapy to mitigate the growing burden of HIVDR in many LMICs.18 Nevertheless, given the relatively recent introduction of DTG-based regimens in the national programme, continued molecular surveillance will be essential to monitor the potential emergence and transmission of INSTI resistance over time.39,40

In this study, despite being unexpected, two major resistance-associated mutations to INSTIs, G140R and Q148H, were identified in two distinct patients from the INP cohort, whereas a major mutation, R263K, was detected in a patient from the IEP cohort. Consistent with the broader literature, the prevalence of INSTI-associated DRMs remains low, even in regions where INSTIs have been widely implemented in ART for several years. When such mutations are detected in INSTI-naive individuals, they likely represent a combination of true transmitted INSTI resistance and the low baseline frequency of rare, naturally occurring non-polymorphic mutations.41 Clinical evidence indicates that mutations at position Q148, particularly when present in combination with other INSTI resistance mutations, are associated with reduced virological suppression in individuals receiving DTG-based ART.42,43 Case reports have also documented the emergence of Q148H and V151V/L mutations in ART-experienced but INSTI-naive patients who failed first-line NNRTI-based regimens, highlighting the potential for prior ART exposure to influence the resistance profile even before INSTI exposure.44

Protease inhibitors remain a critical therapeutic option for patients experiencing virological failure on DTG-based regimens. In the present study, no major darunavir resistance-associated mutations were detected, while PI mutations I54V and V82A conferring resistance to lopinavir and atazanavir were identified in only 1.5% of the analysed sequences. These findings are consistent with global evidence indicating that PI resistance remains relatively uncommon, largely due to the high genetic barrier to resistance and the limited cross-resistance profiles characteristic of this drug class.43 Maintaining sustained access to boosted PI regimens, together with their rational and guideline-directed use, will therefore be essential to preserve the effectiveness of second-line therapeutic strategies. In addition, strengthening routine resistance surveillance and ensuring timely optimization of treatment for individuals experiencing virological failure will be critical to sustaining long-term treatment success and limiting the accumulation of drug resistance.8,43

Limitations

This study has certain limitations that should be acknowledged. The lower amplification rate of the PR/RT and INT coding regions observed mostly in DBS samples can likely be attributed to their prolonged storage and exposure to multiple freeze-thaw cycles, factors known to compromise nucleic acid integrity and reduce amplification efficiency. In addition, the possibility that some specimens were stored under suboptimal conditions may have further contributed to decreased sequencing performance resulting in a non-uniform sequencing success across the same patients for the PR, RT and INT regions and the results cannot be directly compared or combined to infer cross-resistance patterns. However, the overall prevalence of these mutations was low, suggesting a minimal impact on the interpretation of resistance patterns and the study’s conclusions. Importantly, the internal consistency of the data and their concordance with established scientific evidence support the robustness, reliability and scientific validity of the findings despite these constraints.

Conclusions

The HIV epidemic in Angola is characterized by considerable epidemiological and genetic complexity, reflected in the co-circulation of multiple subtypes and recombinant forms. In the context of the rapid scale-up of DTG-based ART in many LMICs, including the national treatment programmes, the continued monitoring of INSTI resistance mutations is increasingly important. Given the current limitations in genotypic resistance surveillance capacity, strengthening molecular monitoring systems will be critical to detect the potential emergence and transmission of INSTI resistance. Such surveillance is essential not only to sustain long-term treatment efficacy but also to provide evidence-based public health strategies aimed at preventing the spread of transmitted drug resistance and optimizing ART regimens at the population level.

Acknowledgements

We express our sincere gratitude to the healthcare professionals and laboratory staff involved in sample collection, processing and data management across the different participating provinces in Angola and the National Institute of Fight Against Aids directors for their institutional support and collaboration throughout the study period. Their collaboration and commitment were essential for the successful implementation of this study. We also acknowledge the contribution of the Brazilian institutions and research teams that supported the molecular and epidemiological analyses conducted in this work.

Contributor Information

Bárbara Pocongo, Instituto Nacional de Luta Contra SIDA (INLS), Ministério da Saúde, Luanda, Angola; Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, LA-REAL, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

Maria Furtado, Instituto Nacional de Luta Contra SIDA (INLS), Ministério da Saúde, Luanda, Angola.

Cláudia Bernardi, Instituto Nacional de Luta Contra SIDA (INLS), Ministério da Saúde, Luanda, Angola.

Lucrécia Jacinto, Instituto Nacional de Luta Contra SIDA (INLS), Ministério da Saúde, Luanda, Angola.

Aulória José, Instituto Nacional de Luta Contra SIDA (INLS), Ministério da Saúde, Luanda, Angola.

Jaime Urica, Instituto Nacional de Luta Contra SIDA (INLS), Ministério da Saúde, Luanda, Angola.

Rosa Torres, Instituto Nacional de Luta Contra SIDA (INLS), Ministério da Saúde, Luanda, Angola.

Francisco Vunge, Instituto Nacional de Luta Contra SIDA (INLS), Ministério da Saúde, Luanda, Angola.

Beatriz Almeida, Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, LA-REAL, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

Michael R Jordan, Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, LA-REAL, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Carlos Jesus, Laboratório de AIDS e Imunologia Molecular, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21045-900, Brazil.

Monick Lindenmeyer Guimarães, Laboratório de AIDS e Imunologia Molecular, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21045-900, Brazil.

Cíntia Mayumi Ahagon, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Centro de Virologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Giselle Lopes, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Centro de Virologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Luís Brígido, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Centro de Virologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Seth Inzaule, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, and Department of Global Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Ana B Abecasis, Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, LA-REAL, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

Ricardo Parreira, Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, LA-REAL, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

João Piedade, Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, LA-REAL, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

Victor Pimentel, Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, LA-REAL, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

Funding

This work was supported by the project Ações para Realização e Promoção da Pesquisa, Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Inovação e Ensino no IOC—PAEF: Projeto de Ações Estratégicas e de Fortalecimento (grant number IOC-008-FIO-22), under the programme Estudos imunológicos, virológicos e genômicos em IST/AIDS, HIV, COVID-19 e suas coinfecções (CNPq grant no. 443156/2024-7). Additional support was provided by the FTC—Fundação para Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P., under the R&D unit Global Health and Tropical Medicine (UID/04413/2025) and by the Associated Laboratory in Translation and Innovation Towards Global Health REAL (LA/P/0117/2020).

Transparency declarations

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

Bárbara Pocongo (Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing), Maria Furtado (Funding acquisition, Project administration), Cláudia Bernardi (Funding acquisition, Project administration), Michael R. Jordan (Validation, Writing—review & editing), Monick Guimarães (Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation), Luís Brígido (Funding acquisition, Investigation, Validation), Ricardo Parreira (Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation), João Piedade (Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation) and Victor Pimentel (Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing—review & editing)

References

  • 1. Oliveira  M, Ibanescu  RI, Anstett  K  et al.  Selective resistance profiles emerging in patient-derived clinical isolates with cabotegravir, bictegravir, dolutegravir, and elvitegravir. Retrovirology  2018; 15: 56. 10.1186/s12977-018-0440-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Leal  SDV, Pimentel  V, Gonçalves  P  et al.  Genetic diversity and antiretroviral resistance in HIV-1-infected patients newly diagnosed in Cabo Verde. Viruses  2024; 16: 1953. 10.3390/v16121953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Brenner  BG, Ibanescu  RI, Hardy  I  et al.  Genotypic and phylogenetic insights on prevention of the spread of HIV-1 and drug resistance in “real-world” settings. Viruses  2017; 10: 10. 10.3390/v10010010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Scutari  R, Alteri  C, Vicenti  I  et al.  Evaluation of HIV-1 integrase resistance emergence and evolution in patients treated with integrase inhibitors. J Glob Antimicrob Resist  2020; 20: 163–9. 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.07.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Hemelaar  J, Loganathan  S, Elangovan  R  et al.  Country level diversity of the HIV-1 pandemic between 1990 and 2015. J Virol  2020; 95: e01580-20. 10.1128/JVI.01580-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Ciccacci  F, Doro Altan  AM, Majid  N  et al.  HIV Dolutegravir resistance and multiclass failure in Mozambique: findings from a real-world cohort. BMC Infect Dis  2025; 25: 1210. 10.1186/s12879-025-11639-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Anon . AIDS, crisis and the power to transform: UNAIDS Global AIDS Update 2025. 2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8. World Health Organization . Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, testing, treatment, service delivery and monitoring: recommendations for a public health approach. 2021. [PubMed]
  • 9. UNAIDS . Fact sheet 2024 - Latest global and regional HIV statistics on the status of the AIDS epidemic. 2024.
  • 10. Sousa e Almeida  PR, Rafael  C, Pimentel  V  et al.  Determinantes demográficos e comportamentais relacionados à adesão à TARV entre pacientes HIV positivos em Luanda, Angola. Braz J Clin Med Rev  2024; 3: bjcmr23. 10.52600/2965-0968.bjcmr.2025.3.1.bjcmr23 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Sebastião  CS, Almeida  P, Julieta  C  et al.  Diversidade genética e resistência antirretroviral em mulheres grávidas de Luanda, Angola. RevSALUS  2026; 8. 10.51126/pj8gyn41 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kharsany  ABM, Karim  QA. HIV infection and AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa: current status, challenges and opportunities. Open AIDS J  2016; 10: 34–48. 10.2174/1874613601610010034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Instituto Nacional de Luta Contra SIDA . RELATÓRIO ANUAL 2022. 2023.
  • 14. Delatorre  E, Silva-De-Jesus  C, Couto-Fernandez  JC  et al.  High HIV-1 diversity and prevalence of transmitted drug resistance among antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected pregnant women from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses  2017; 33: 68–73. 10.1089/aid.2016.0159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Passaes  CPB, Bello  G, Lorete  RS  et al.  Genetic characterization of HIV-1 BC recombinants and evolutionary history of the CRF31_BC in Southern Brazil. Infect Genet Evol  2009; 9: 474–82. 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Woods  CK, Brumme  CJ, Liu  TF  et al.  Automating HIV drug resistance genotyping with RECall, a freely accessible sequence analysis tool. J Clin Microbiol  2012; 50: 1936–42. 10.1128/JCM.06689-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Struck  D, Lawyer  G, Ternes  AM  et al.  COMET: adaptive context-based modeling for ultrafast HIV-1 subtype identification. Nucleic Acids Res  2014; 42: e144. 10.1093/nar/gku739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Godinho  IS, Queirós  G, Yefimenko  L  et al.  HIV-1 Genetic diversity and transmitted resistance to integrase strand transfer inhibitors in Benguela, Angola. Microorganisms  2026; 14: 1156. 10.3390/microorganisms14051156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Bártolo  I, Rocha  C, Bartolomeu  J  et al.  Highly divergent subtypes and new recombinant forms prevail in the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Angola: new insights into the origins of the AIDS pandemic. Infect Genet Evol  2009; 9: 672–82. 10.1016/j.meegid.2008.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Sebastião  CS, Morais  J, Brito  M. Factors influencing HIV drug resistance among pregnant women in Luanda, Angola: findings from a cross-sectional study. Trop Med Infect Dis  2021; 6: 29. 10.3390/tropicalmed6010029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Afonso  JM, Bello  G, Guimarães  ML  et al.  HIV-1 genetic diversity and transmitted drug resistance mutations among patients from the north, central and south regions of Angola. PLoS One  2012; 7: e42996. 10.1371/journal.pone.0042996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Instituto Nacional de Estatística . Inquérito de Indicadores Múltiplos de Saúde 2024. 2025.
  • 23. Garrido  C, Zahonero  N, Fernándes  D  et al.  Subtype variability, virological response and drug resistance assessed on dried blood spots collected from HIV patients on antiretroviral therapy in Angola. J Antimicrob Chemother  2008; 61: 694–8. 10.1093/jac/dkm515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Hemelaar  J, Elangovan  R, Yun  J  et al.  Global and regional epidemiology of HIV-1 recombinants in 1990-2015: a systematic review and global survey. Lancet HIV  2020; 7: e772–81. 10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30252-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Matume  ND, Tebit  DM, Bessong  PO. HIV-1 subtype C predicted co-receptor tropism in Africa: an individual sequence level meta-analysis. AIDS Res Ther  2020; 17: 5. 10.1186/s12981-020-0263-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Arts  EJ, Tebit  DM. Tracking a century of global expansion and evolution of HIV to drive understanding and to combat disease. Lancet Infect Dis  2011; 11: 45–56. 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70186-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Gupta  RK, Gregson  J, Parkin  N  et al.  HIV-1 drug resistance before initiation or re-initiation of first-line antiretroviral therapy in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Lancet Infect Dis  2018; 18: 346–55. 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30702-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Bártolo  I, Rocha  C, Bartolomeu  J  et al.  Antiretroviral drug resistance surveillance among treatment-naive human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected individuals in Angola: evidence for low level of transmitted drug resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother  2009; 53: 3156–8. 10.1128/AAC.00110-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Augusto Yabar  C. Multiple Resistance and Unusual Mutations from HIV-1 Infecting Peruvian Patients with Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy. 2018. https://hivdb.stanford.edu/.
  • 30. Kayinda  F, Awor  P, Mahaba  T  et al.  Prevalence of HIV drug resistance, its correlates and common mutations among people living with HIV failing on ART in northern Uganda: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One  2025; 20: e0320623. 10.1371/journal.pone.0320623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sista  P, Rinehart  A, Wasikowski  B  et al.  Nine-year trends in clinically relevant reduced susceptibility of HIV-1 to antiretrovirals. J Clin Virol  2009; 44: 190–4. 10.1016/j.jcv.2008.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Charpentier  C, Lambert-Niclot  S, Visseaux  B  et al.  Evolution of the K65R, K103N and M184V/I reverse transcriptase mutations in HIV-1-infected patients experiencing virological failure between 2005 and 2010. J Antimicrob Chemother  2013; 68: 2197–8. 10.1093/jac/dkt184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Siedner  MJ, Moorhouse  MA, Simmons  B  et al.  Reduced efficacy of HIV-1 integrase inhibitors in patients with drug resistance mutations in reverse transcriptase. Nat Commun  2020; 11: 5922. 10.1038/s41467-020-19801-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Chen  GJ, Sun  HY, Chang  SY  et al.  Effectiveness of second-generation integrase strand-transfer inhibitor-based regimens for antiretroviral-experienced people with HIV who had viral rebound. J Microbiol Immunol Infect  2023; 56: 988–95. 10.1016/j.jmii.2023.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Tsai  HC, Chen  IT, Chang  HM  et al.  Prevalence of integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance in people living with HIV and virological failure. J Chin Med Assoc  2024; 87: 1002–10. 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ferrer  P, Ramos  V, Durán  M  et al.  Prevalence of acquired resistance to HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) in clinical samples from treatment-experienced patients in Chile, 2012–2023. J Virus Erad  2025; 11: 100608. 10.1016/j.jve.2025.100608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Mziray  SR, Kumburu  HH, Assey  HB  et al.  Patterns of acquired HIV-1 drug resistance mutations and predictors of virological failure in Moshi, Northern Tanzania. PLoS One  2020; 15: e0232649. 10.1371/journal.pone.0232649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Boender  TS, Kityo  CM, Boerma  RS  et al.  Accumulation of HIV-1 drug resistance after continued virological failure on first-line ART in adults and children in sub-Saharan Africa. J Antimicrob Chemother  2016; 71: 2918–27. 10.1093/jac/dkw218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. WHO . Updated Recommendations on First-Line and Second-Line Antiretroviral Regimens and Post-Exposure Prophylaxis and Recommendations on Early Infant Diagnosis of HIV. Supplement to the 2016 Consolidated Guidelines on the use of Antiretroviral Drugs for Treating and Preventing HIV Infection Interim Guidelines HIV Treatment. 2018.
  • 40. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS . The Path That Ends AIDS 2023 UNAIDS Global AIDS Update. 2023. http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/rules.
  • 41. Bailey  AJ, Rhee  SY, Shafer  RW. Integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance in integrase strand transfer inhibitor-naive persons. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses  2021; 37: 736–43. 10.1089/aid.2020.0261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. van Kampen  J, Voermans  J, Soochit  W  et al.  Two cases of possible transmitted HIV drug resistance to all currently available integrase inhibitors, the Netherlands, 2025. Euro Surveill  2026; 31: 2600108. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.8.2600108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Rhee  SY, Sankaran  K, Varghese  V  et al.  HIV-1 protease, reverse transcriptase, and integrase variation. J Virol  2016; 90: 6058–70. 10.1128/JVI.00495-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Arora  S, Kisenjang  N, Ashta  KK  et al.  Emergence of integrase strand transfer inhibitors resistance mutations in multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus strains detected in integrase strand transfer inhibitors naïve Indian persons living with human immunodeficiency virus: a report of three cases. J Clin Infect Dis Soc  2024; 2: 327–31. 10.4103/CIDS.CIDS_43_24 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES