Skip to main content
G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics logoLink to G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
. 2026 Sep 2;16(11):jkag231. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkag231

Temporal transcriptomic and microbiome changes in American bison during experimental SARS-CoV-2 challenge

Bruna Petry 1,2, Paola M Boggiatto 3, Alexandra Buckley 4, Eric D Cassmann 5, Kaitlyn Sarlo Davila 6, Steven C Olsen 7, Luis Guilherme Virgilio Fernandes 8,9, Bienvenido Tibbs-Cortes 10, Faith M Rahic-Seggerman 11, Mitchell V Palmer 12, Ellie J Putz 13,✉
Editor: M Arbeitman
PMCID: PMC13732425  PMID: 42684938

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to pose a threat to humans as well as domestic and wild animals. The variability in severity of clinical signs, the zoonotic potential, and the host-specific response to infection contribute to the persistence of circulation of disease. In wildlife species, white-tailed deer have been shown to be more permissive to infection than bovids. However, among bovids, American bison have shown a greater susceptibility than cattle. In this study, we investigate the transcriptomic response to experimental SARS-CoV-2 infection in bison over time. Substantial numbers of differentially expressed genes were identified between pre- and 2, 5, 7, 14, and 21 days post-inoculation. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes and Gene Ontology term analysis identified associations with immune response, inflammatory response, and viral infection including COVID-19. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of the coronavirus pathway highlighted differences in signaling at days 2 versus 21 post-inoculation. We additionally examined changes in the nasal microbiome of bison over the course of experimental infection, which suggested an increase in opportunity for secondary infection causing pathogens such as Mannheimia. Collectively, this study presents a profile of bison transcriptomic response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and continues to expand our understanding of variation in host response.

Keywords: Bison bison, coronavirus, intranasal, SARS-CoV-2

Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the virus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, which to date has resulted in over 778 million human cases worldwide (Sitharam et al. 2024). In addition to the global impact on humans, the virus has variable infectivity among domestic and wildlife species (Gass et al. 2022). The list of species with known susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 has been steadily increasing over the years following the first official report of SARS-CoV-2 in a dog in February 2021. According to Situation Report 22 from the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH), by 2023, the number of different species infected with the virus was 29, occurring in 36 different countries, with a total of 775 animal outbreaks worldwide (WOAH 2023). This includes wildlife hosts such as white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus).

Among large animal wildlife species, cervids such as white-tailed deer have shown increased permissiveness to SARS-CoV-2 infection. White-tailed deer are highly susceptible to virus infection both under experimental (Palmer et al. 2021) and field conditions (Hale et al. 2022), and their SARS-CoV-2 angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor sequence shares a high level of homology with that of humans (Damas et al. 2020). In experimental models, white-tailed deer are able to transmit the virus to other deer through days 3–5 post-inoculation (pi), they develop neutralizing antibodies against the virus as early as day 7 pi, and viral RNA was shown to persist in different tissues for at least 21 d after challenge (Palmer et al. 2021; Martins et al. 2022). In contrast, while no evidence of seroconversion has been found in free-ranging elk species, under experimental infection conditions, American elk (Cervus elaphus canadensis) can develop a neutralizing antibody response to infection as early as day 7 pi, which was sustained through day 21 pi (Boggiatto et al. 2024). Furthermore, blood transcriptome profile of adult and elk calves experimentally challenged with SARS-CoV-2, demonstrated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to viral response, immune activation, and antibody production. Further, many DEGs were associated with the Coronavirus Pathogenesis Pathways, specifically during peak viral infection on days 2 and 5 pi, for both adult and elk calves (Petry et al. 2025).

Compared to cervids, bovid species such as cattle have shown less susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection (Ulrich et al. 2020). However, among bovids, North American bison (Bison bison) appear to be more permissive to infection than cattle (Ardalan et al. 2024; Palmer et al. 2025). American bison are an important livestock and wildlife species in the United States and are known to be susceptible to diseases such as brucellosis (Olsen 2010; Register et al. 2021), paratuberculosis (Buergelt et al. 2000), and some types of herpesvirus such as Ovine Herpesvirus-2 (Cunha et al. 2012; Taus et al. 2014). It is already known that American bison, European bison (Bison bonasus), and buffalos (Bubalus bubalis) can be infected with coronavirus species, such as bovine coronavirus (Ferrara et al. 2023; Ardalan et al. 2024; Larska et al. 2024). Recently, we and others have shown that bison are also susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection (Ardalan et al. 2024; Palmer et al. 2025). Under experimental conditions, bison did not develop clinical signs after challenge; however, they were permissive to infection, as they developed neutralizing antibodies, showed oronasal viral RNA shedding, developed limited interstitial pneumonia, and had viral RNA persist in lymphoid tissues and lung through 21 d pi (Palmer et al. 2025).

The aim of this study was to investigate the whole blood transcriptomic profile of American bison experimentally challenged with SARS-CoV-2. In addition to evaluating the host gene expression, we also examined the nasal microbiota of bison. The respiratory microbiota is known to play a role in pulmonary immunity (Man et al. 2017). Studies have examined the microbiota in COVID-19 patients, documenting perturbations and dysbiosis (Engen et al. 2021); however, few studies have examined the microbiota of animals infected with SARS-CoV-2.

Materials and methods

SARS-CoV-2 challenge, sample collection, RNA isolation, and sequencing

For this study, all procedures and animal work were performed following the approval from the NADC Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC, protocol #ARS-23–1154) and in accordance with the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals regulations. Nine animals, between 8 and 24 mo of age, were accommodated to an agricultural biosafety level 3 (ABSL3) facility. After 25 d acclimation, the animals were intranasally challenged with a viral suspension containing 106 tissue culture infectious dose 50 per milliliter (TCID50/mL) of an ancestral strain of SARS-CoV-2 (USA-WA1/2020), as described in Boggiatto et al. (2024) and Palmer et al. (2025). Briefly, although there were no clinical signs associated with the disease, all animals were sampled and screened for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by qPCR to confirm the infection. Some animals were euthanized earlier than others over a predetermined course to evaluate viral loads and pathology tissues; thus, the numbers of animals used for this study decreased over time (Palmer et al. 2025).

For RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis, blood samples were collected on day 0 (control, before challenge for 9 animals), day 2 (9 animals), day 5 (6 animals), day 7 (5 animals), day 14 (5 animals), and day 21 pi (5 animals) (Fig. 1) and stored following PAXgene Blood RNA tube (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) recommendations. Sterile cotton swabs were used to swab each of the nares of bison on days 0, 2, 7, 14, and 21 pi. To account for microbial contaminants, control swabs exposed to the air of the enclosure were also collected alongside the nasal swabs on days 2, 7,14, and 21 pi. Swabs were immediately placed in 5 mL of sterile 1× phosphate-buffered saline and placed on dry ice for transport to −80 °C storage.

Fig. 1.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Animals were acclimated in an agricultural biosafety level 3 (ABSL-3) facility and then underwent intranasal SARS-CoV-2 (USA-WA1/2020) challenge. Blood samples were collected on day 0 before virus inoculation (control), and 2, 5, 7, 14, and 21 d post-inoculation.

RNA isolation, RNA-seq, and bioinformatics: quality control and reads mapping

RNA was isolated using MagMAX for Stabilized Blood Tubes RNA Isolation Kit, compatible with PAXgene Blood RNA Tubes (catalog number 4451894; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The RNA integrity number and quality were determined by Bioanalyzer, and samples were submitted to the Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center (University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign), for library preparation and sequencing. RNA-seq was completed using Nova Seq X Plus, generating 150 base-pair paired-end reads.

RNA-seq data were processed using the Nextflow (version 24.04.2) nf-core/rna-seq pipeline (version 3.14.0) (Di Tommaso et al. 2017; Ewels et al. 2020). Read quality was assessed with FastQC (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/, version 0.12.1), followed by adapter trimming and low-quality read removal (Phred score < 20) using TRIMgalore (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/, version 0.6.7). After quality filtering, some samples that did not pass the QC were removed prior to the subsequent analysis. An average of 54 million reads per sample were successfully mapped (mapping quality > 0) to the B. bison reference genome (Bison_UMD1.0, GCA_000754665.1) using STAR (Dobin et al. 2013, version 2.7.10a) via nf-core/rnaseq RSEM workflow, with alignment parameters including –outSAMunmapped Within, –outFilterType BySJout, –outFilterMultimapNmax 20, –outFilterMismatchNoverLmax 0.04, –alignSJoverhangMin 8, and –alignSJDBoverhangMin 1. Gene-level quantification was performed with featureCounts (Liao et al. 2014, release 2.0.4), counting paired-end fragments (−p) assigned to exonic features (−t exon) at the gene_id level, with a minimum fragment overlap of 20 bp required (−d 20). All the subsequent statistical analyses were performed using R environment (v2024.9.1.394). The codes used to run the RNA-seq and downstream analysis can be found in Supplementary File 1.

DEG, enrichment analysis, and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis

After the quality control filters, samples with low-quality reads (i.e. less than 10M reads per sample) were removed from downstream analysis. Differential expression analyses were performed separately for each post-inoculation time point—day 2 (n = 8), day 5 (n = 6), day 7 (n = 5), day 14 (n = 5), and day 21 (n = 3)—compared to the control group (n = 9). For each comparison, a subset of samples corresponding to the 2 relevant time points was analyzed using DESeq2 (Love et al. 2014, version 1.44.0) with the model design = ∼ Group (control vs. infected). Prior to the DE analysis, genes were filtered to exclude those with no expression (zero-count reads across samples), genes with average of <1 read per sample, and rare expression across the samples (genes with read counts that were not present in at least 20% of the samples). Size factors were estimated using the median-ratio method, dispersion was estimated using empirical Bayes shrinkage, Wald tests were used for hypothesis testing, and P-values were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate procedure. Significant differential gene expression was determined by an adjusted P-value <0.05. For visualization purposes only, volcano plots were generated using a log2 fold-change (FC) cutoff of 1 to improve interpretability of the figure. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were performed using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources (DAVID Functional Annotation Bioinformatics) to help interpret and summarize the relevant biological processes and pathways. To identify canonical metabolic pathways predicted to be activated or inhibited (z-score ≥ 2), the DEGs lists were further analyzed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) (QIAGEN, Redwood City, CA).

DNA extraction and subsequent longitudinal analysis of the bison nasal microbiota

Tubes containing the frozen nasal swabs were thawed, and biological material was released from the swabs by vortexing at 3,200 rpm for 5 min using a Vortex-Genie 2 with a 15 mL conical adapter (Scientific Industries, Inc., Bohemia, NY). After vortexing and removing swabs, biological material was pelleted by centrifugation at 4,700 × g for 3 min. DNA was extracted from the pellet using the DNeasy PowerLyzer PowerSoil Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions, specifically utilizing the vortex method for the bead beating step. Extracted DNA was sent to the University of Illinois Keck Center for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Amplification of the 16S rRNA gene V4 region was performed using primers 515F (5′ GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA 3′) and 806RB (5′ GGACTACNVGGGTWTCTAAT 3′) (16S Illumin 16S Illumina Amplicon Protocol a Amplicon Protocol: earthmicrobiome) on the Fluidigm Biomark HD high throughput PCR system. Pooled libraries were sequenced on a MiSeq V2 flow cell (paired end, 2 × 250 cycles).

Demultiplexed raw reads received from the sequencing facility were merged into contigs by mothur (v1.48.0) (Schloss et al. 2009), and low-quality contigs containing any ambiguities, possessing homopolymeric regions >8 bp, and/or with total length <252 bp were removed. Merged reads which passed these quality metrics were subsequently aligned against the SILVA SSU NR database (v138); reads aligning outside the region to which 97.5% of all reads aligned were discarded. Finally, chimeric sequences were identified using the SILVA.gold database and subsequently removed. The final, cleaned reads were then clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using de novo clustering at a 99% similarity threshold, and taxonomic classification was performed using the SILVA SSU NR database (v138). Representative sequences from the 10,000 most abundant OTUs were collected from the mothur output and further classified using BLASTn (-word_size = 6, -max_hsps = 1, -max_target_seqs = 10) against the entire 16S rRNA RefSeq database (accessed December 3, 2024). OTUs are referred to by their SILVA.gold classification unless otherwise stated.

Results from mothur were organized and processed using the package phyloseq (v1.48.0) (McMurdie and Holmes 2013) in R (v4.4.1). Next, OTUs which were likely contaminants were identified by leveraging sequenced negative controls via the prevalence method of the package decontam (v1.24.0) (Davis et al. 2018). Using decontam, OTUs were assigned a P score representing the likelihood of the OTU originating from the nasal microbiome instead of originating from contamination during sample isolation, processing, or sequencing. P score distributions were visualized, and OTUs with a P score <0.725 were classified as contaminants and removed from the analysis along with any remaining OTUs represented in the final dataset by <10 reads.

Alpha diversity was estimated using the Rust implementation of the R package DivNet, divnet-rs (https://github.com/mooreryan/divnet-rs), in order to calculate the Shannon and Gini-Simpson indices for each time point (Willis and Martin 2022). Statistical analysis comparing the alpha diversity indices between each time point was conducted using the R package breakaway (v4.8.4) (Willis and Bunge 2015), accounting for time point as a fixed effect and using the Benjamini–Hochberg multiple testing correction method. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) using Bray–Curtis dissimilarity was performed using phyloseq to visualize beta diversity between the microbiota of each animal at each time point.

The GLIMMIX procedure in SAS (version 9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was employed to determine changes in the abundance of individual phyla, genera, and OTUs following a negative binomial distribution (SAS Institute Inc 2009). The statistical model included time point as a fixed effect, while animal ID was specified as a random effect with repeated measures. Two separate analyses were completed: (1) comparison of pre-infection versus 2 d pi using samples from all bison (n = 9), and (2) pairwise comparisons across all time points (n = 5). Taxa considered in the analyses included all phyla, the 100 most abundant genera, and the 300 most abundant OTUs. The MULTTEST procedure in SAS was used to control for false discovery rate, and results were deemed statistically significant if both P ≤0.05 and q ≤0.05 (SAS Institute 1999). For taxa exhibiting significant changes in abundance over time, log2FCs between time points were calculated and visualized using R (v4.4.1). The codes for all the microbiome analysis can be found in Supplementary File 2.

Results

Differential gene expression across experimental infection

We sequenced whole blood samples from bison at pre-challenge (day 0), and 2, 5, 7, 14, and 21d pi. After DEG analysis, we identified that bison had a robust response to infection.

When comparing day 2 pi to pre-challenge (day 0), 1,016 DEGs were found: 445 downregulated and 571 upregulated (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Files 3 and 4). From the upregulated gene list, 16 upregulated genes were previously associated with the coronavirus disease—COVID-19 KEGG pathway, including angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE), neuropilin 1 (NRP1), and signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1). Upregulated genes were additionally associated with other virus-related pathways such as hepatitis C, influenza A, and Epstein–Barr virus infection (Supplementary File 4). Seventeen genes were found to be associated with the innate immune response GO term, including ficolin 1 (FCN1), nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 (NOD2), syntaxin 11 (STX11), and cluster of differentiation 14 (CD14). In contrast, among the downregulated DEGs, 46 were annotated within the herpes simplex virus 1 infection KEGG pathway, suggesting a suppression of select antiviral programs, showing an early host response characterized by both activation of innate immunity and modulation of viral defense pathways (Supplementary File 5).

Fig. 2.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Volcano plots representing significant DEGs with log2FCs greater than 1 and (P-adjusted < 0.05). a) The DEGs for day 2 post-inoculation (pi) compared with those on day 0, b) for day 5 pi, c) for day 7 pi, d) for day 14 pi, and e) for day 21 pi. Red dots indicate DEGs with an absolute log2FC greater than 1, and the dashed horizontal line represents the adjusted P-value below 0.05. Blue dots are DEGs with P-adjusted <0.05 and log2FC less than 1.

Comparing pre-challenge day 0 with day 5 pi, we identified 416 DEGs: 156 downregulated and 260 upregulated (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Files 3 and 4). Upregulated DEGs were associated with metabolic pathways, lipid and atherosclerosis, cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction, and influenza A, but also GO terms related to immune response and inflammatory responses (Supplementary File 4). Two examples of the upregulated genes are interferon-induced protein 44 (IFI44, log2FC = 1.47) and interferon alpha inducible protein 6 (IFI6, log2FC = 1.34). IFI44 plays an important role in the innate immune system during virus infection and can negatively regulate the host viral responses (Dediego et al. 2019; Pan et al. 2020). IFI6 has already been described during the induction of innate immune responses against influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 (Villamayor et al. 2023). In contrast, the downregulated genes enriched in KEGG pathways included focal adhesion and human cytomegalovirus infection, suggesting possible suppression of cell adhesion mechanisms and viral responses (Supplementary File 5).

Day 7 pi compared to day 0 yielded only 26 DEGs (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Files 3 and 4). Of those, 22 genes were upregulated including high expression differences with large log2FC values such as ADRB3 (log2FC = 4.55), MARCO (log2FC = 3.98), TGM1 (log2FC = 3.26), and GALNTL5 (log2FC = 2.21). Of particular interest, macrophage receptor with collagen structure (MARCO) is associated with pathogen recognition and inflammatory signaling during infection (Zhou et al. 2024). Upregulated genes were associated with GO terms including membrane, transmembrane, and WNT-protein binding, highlighting a dynamic shift in cellular communication and immune response pathways (Supplementary File 5). There were only 6 DE downregulated genes identified: FBLN1 (log2FC = −3.10), LOC104981726 (log2FC = −2.58), ATOH8 (log2FC = −2.42), MUSTN1 (log2FC = −2.12), NKD2 (log2FC = −2.09), and ARHGEF37 (log2FC = −1.23). Some of these genes are associated with functions including extracellular matrix composition and WNT signaling, and the reduction in their expression can be reflecting a potential response to infection related cellular stress or immune modulation (Ducommun et al. 2024; Wang et al. 2025).

Day 14 pi versus day 0 analysis revealed 1,478 DEGs: 467 upregulated and 1,011 downregulated (Fig. 2d, Supplementary Files 3 and 4). Upregulated genes were associated with endocytosis, Salmonella infection, human T-cell leukemia virus 1 infection, neurotrophin signaling pathway, and tuberculosis KEGG pathways; GO terms were associated with nucleus, cytoplasm, ATP binding, and protein binding. Downregulated DEGs had associations with GO terms such as nucleus, cytoplasm, metal ion binding, protein binding, ATP binding, RNA binding, and cell differentiation, and KEGG pathways predicted associated terms including herpes simplex 1 virus infection, MAPK signaling pathway, and human papillomavirus infection (Supplementary File 5).

Lastly, day 0 versus day 21 pi, there were 3,078 DEGs: 1,906 upregulated and 1,172 downregulated (Fig. 2e, Supplementary Files 3 and 4). From the upregulated list, 74 genes were associated with the Coronavirus disease—COVID-19 KEGG pathway, including innate immune signal transduction adaptor (MYD88), NF-κB inhibitor alpha and beta (NFKBIA and NFKBIB), TNF receptor superfamily member 1A (TNFRSF1A), and the mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 (MAPK3). Also identified KEGG pathways were 77 genes related to pathways of neurodegeneration, 66 genes in the Alzheimer disease pathway, and 51 genes in the Parkinson disease (Supplementary File 5). Additionally, 29 upregulated genes were associated with the GO term for inflammatory response. Downregulated genes included known as B-cell markers, CD19 and CD79B, which have shown to be dysregulated in human COVID survivors (Jing et al. 2021). Downregulated genes were associated with KEGG pathways such as herpes simplex 1 virus infection (51 genes), ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes (22 genes), human T-cell leukemia virus 1 infection (20 genes), and cell cycle (19 genes) (Supplementary File 5).

Collectively the high levels of transcriptomic activity as early as at day 2 pi, decreasing DEGs through day 7 pi, then increasing again between day 14 and 21 pi, may suggest bimodal regulation of innate and adaptive immune responses respectively. To take full advantage of our longitudinal analysis, we also assessed whether DEGs were conserved across time point comparisons. There were 3 upregulated DEGs across all time points: solute carrier family 35 member E4 (SLC35E4), DC-STAMP domain-containing 2 (DCST2), and zinc finger and BTB domain-containing 7B (ZBTB7B). Five downregulated genes overlapped across days 2, 5, 14, and 21 pi comparisons: solute carrier family 16 member 9 (SLC16A9), zinc finger AN1-type containing 4 (ZFAND4), zinc finger protein 547 (ZNF547), G-patch domain-containing 2-like (GPATCH2L), and nuclear casein kinase and cyclin-dependent kinase substrate 1 (NUCKS1) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Venn diagram showing the number of conserved up and downregulated genes across all time points. a) Downregulated genes and b) upregulated genes.

Ingenuity Pathway Analysis

We utilized the IPA software to characterize nuances within the coronavirus disease pathway identified in our differential expression analysis. IPA analysis corroborated KEGG pathway findings and identified associations with DEGs and coronavirus diseases on both days 2 and 21 pi (see Fig. 4). Early in infection (day 2 pi) we see C-C motif chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) and interleukin-17 receptor A (IL17RA) have increased expression compared to pre-challenge. Interferon-stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3) was predicted to be activated compared to day 0 at both days 2 and 21 pi and it is suggested to contribute to the inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 replication and activation of the adaptive immune response. Terms related to innate immunity were also activated at both time points through IFN type 1 activation, where a proinflammatory cytokine response is predicted through NF-kB signaling. Angiotensin II receptor type I (AGTR1) was activated on day 21 pi and indirectly related to vasoconstriction, acute myocarditis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and inflammation. Also on day 21 pi, SMAD family members 3 and 4 (SMAD3 and SMAD4) were predicted to be inhibited. Unique to the 21-d pi comparison, interferon-induced transmembrane protein 1 (IFITM) was upregulated and indirectly related to endocytosis of virus inhibition, as well as heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (HNRNPA1), which is also indirectly related to inhibition in the replication of SARS-CoV-2.

Fig. 4.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

IPA showing the DEGs involved in the coronavirus pathogenesis pathway in bison. The Core analysis shows predicted activated and inhibited pathway associations for the DEG lists for day 2 (a) and day 21 (b) post-SARS-CoV-2 infection. Downregulated genes are shown in green, and upregulated genes are shown in pink. The Molecule Activity Predictor tool was used to predict downstream activity based on significant differential gene expression. Predicted activation is shown in orange, and predicted inhibition is shown in blue. The darker the fill is, the more confident the prediction. The solid lines represent direct relationships, whereas the dashed lines represent indirect relationships.

Longitudinal analysis of the bison nasal microbiome

DNA was isolated from nasal swabs of bison on days 0, 2, 7, 14 and 21 pi. Examination of raw data revealed 9,542,608 merged reads/contigs. Of these, 6,980,907 reads remained following quality control and chimera removal in mothur (Schloss et al. 2009). De novo OTU clustering generated 433,194 OTUs of which 296 were classified as likely contaminants; removal of the likely contaminants and low-abundance OTUs yielded a final dataset of 29,099 OTUs. Alpha diversity analysis revealed more significant differences in the Shannon index between time points compared to the Gini-Simpson index. The Shannon index at 2 d pi and 21 d pi was significantly higher than at the pre-infection time point but was significantly lower at 14 d pi. Additionally, alpha diversity was more variable at 14 d pi according to both Shannon and Gini-Simpson indices (Fig. 5a). No obvious clustering was apparent from visualization of beta diversity by PCoA (Fig. 5b).

Fig. 5.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Alpha diversity, beta diversity, and the 10 most abundant phyla and genera of the bison nasal microbiota at all time points. a) Shannon (left panel) and Gini-Simpson (right panel) diversity indices of the bison nasal microbiota were calculated using divnet-rs. Time points with the same letters are not significantly different (P > 0.05). b) Phyloseq was used to conduct PCoA based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity to visualize differences in the composition of the microbiota of each animal at each time point. Ellipses represent 95% confidence intervals assuming a multivariate normal distribution. c) Relative abundances of the 10 most abundant phyla and d) genera in the dataset.

The most abundant phyla at all time points were Bacillota (Firmicutes), Pseudomonadota (Proteobacteria), Actinomycetota (Actinobacteria), and Bacteroidota (Bacteroidetes) (Fig. 5c). Common genera across all time points included Corynebacterium, Moraxella, and an unclassified genus in the family Moraxellaceae (Fig. 5d). Among the most abundant OTUs, OTUs 1 and 2 clustered as part of the same genus and were most similar to Limnovirga soli (BLAST percent identity of ∼92%). BLAST analysis also revealed that OTU 3 was most similar to Candidatus Limnoluna rubra (∼96% identity). OTU 4, which was part of the aforementioned unclassified Moraxellaceae genus, was most similar to members of the genus Psychrobacter (∼96% identity) (Supplementary File 6).

Between the pre-infection nasal samples and 2 d pi, the relative abundance of 8 phyla (Fig. 6a, Supplementary File 7) and 22 OTUs differed significantly (Fig. 6b, Supplementary File 7). OTUs which were more abundant at 2 d pi included OTUs 12, 122, and 124, which were all classified as Mannheimia. When analyzing only the 5 animals that were sampled at all time points, 14 phyla, 3 genera, and 80 OTUs were found to be differentially abundant across all time points (Supplementary File 7). Multiple of these OTUs were classified as belonging to taxa known to be associated with bovine respiratory disease: Mannheimia (OTUs 12, 123, 124, and 418), Pasturellaceae (OTUs 52 and 343), and Mycoplasmopsis (Mycoplasma) (OTUs 41, 273, and 424). With the exceptions of OTUs 41 and 343, these putative respiratory bacteria increased in abundance relative to the pre-infection time point at 2 and 7 d pi, and some of these taxa maintained a significantly increased abundance out to 14 d pi (Fig. 6c).

Fig. 6.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Differentially abundant taxa across time points. a) Phyla and b) genera that were differentially abundant between pre-infection and 2 d pi as expressed by absolute log2FCs in relative abundance. Data are based on SAS analysis of samples from all 9 animals at pre-infection and 2 d pi. c) Log2FCs in the relative abundance of selected OTUs at all time points relative to the relative abundance at the pre-infection time point. Data are based on SAS analysis of samples from only the 5 animals that were sampled at each time point.

Discussion

American bison appear more permissive to SARS-CoV-2 infection than their cattle bovid counterparts. This was previously illustrated by work from our group that collectively established oral and nasal detection of viral RNA, production of neutralizing antibodies by day 14 pi, the presence of microscopic lesions during the acute disease phase, and consistent viral RNA detection in the medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes and lung throughout infection (Palmer et al. 2025). To further understand the immune mechanisms driving the bison response to SARS-CoV-2, this follow-up study investigated the bison blood transcriptomic response to experimental SARS-CoV-2 infection. DEG changes of interest were associated with all time points, with an emphasis on the COVID-19 pathway associations identified on days 2 and 21 pi.

Our group is interested in host components that might contribute to the difference in susceptibility among different host species. Previously, we published the transcriptomic responses of adult and elk calves to experimental SARS-CoV-2 challenge. Upon examination of collective KEGG and GO term analysis, there are distinctions between species. Unlike elk, bison do not have as many associations with inflammation markers, neurodegenerative disease, or additional viral pathogens. However, comparing the IPA Coronavirus pathogenesis pathway, both bison and elk have similar recognition profiles early in infection. At 2 d pi, bison, similar to elk (Petry et al. 2025), have predicted type 1 IFN and NF-kB activation, contributing to innate and adaptive immune responses including upregulation of the interleukin-1 beta (IL1b), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8 (CXCL8), C-C motif ligand 5 (CCL5), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Notably, in elk, we see decreased expression and inhibition of these activating networks and cytokines by day 14 pi; however, in bison, there is still strong NF-kB and type 1 IFN proinflammatory signaling even through day 21 pi. Consistent with the human SARS-CoV-2 literature, CD19 was strongly reduced in bison at day 21 pi, mirroring findings in recovered COVID-19 patients where CD19 downregulation is associated with impaired B-cell signaling and immune dysregulation after clinical recovery, where B-cell deficiencies can be seen as late as 50 d post symptom onset (Jing et al. 2021; An et al. 2025). Neither elk nor bison displayed clinical signs of disease despite evidence of sustained infection as shown by the persistence of viral RNA in lymphoid tissues through day 21 pi. However, unlike elk, bison also showed persistent viral RNA in lung tissues. Furthermore, the viral RNA in the lungs was associated with pulmonary pathology, specifically focal areas of interstitial pneumonia. Collectively, the bimodal transcriptomic response observed in bison, with DEG responses first peaking at 2 d pi, a lull at day 7 pi, and subsequent second peak at day 21 pi, is consistent the expected innate and subsequent adaptive immune responses. Furthermore, the extended proinflammatory signaling observed in the periphery as indicated by day 21 pi data, along with the pulmonary pathology and viral RNA presence, suggest that bison may be less effective at clearing the virus as compared to elk.

While many factors affect disease pathogenesis, one of these factors may be related to the commensal nasal flora of bison, and disruptions that may occur following an infection. Here, we assessed changes associated with the bison nasal microbiome following infection with SARS-CoV-2. Longitudinal analysis of the bison nasal microbiota during the experiment revealed perturbations in alpha diversity and shifts in the abundance of specific taxa following intranasal SARS-CoV-2 infection. Notably, multiple OTUs belonging to the taxa Mannheimia, Mycoplasmosis (Mycoplasma), and Pasteurellaceae were found to increase in relative abundance following SARS-CoV-2 infection relative to the pre-infection time point. Members of these taxa include opportunistic pathogens of bison and cattle, including some of the causative agents of the bovine respiratory disease complex (McMullen et al. 2020; Centeno-Martinez et al. 2022, 2023; McDaneld et al. 2022). Bison and cattle are susceptible to Mannheimia infection, but in vitro work has shown greater reactive oxygen species and bacterial uptake by cattle compared to bison (Menghwar et al. 2025), suggesting that cattle have a more robust response to infection with this bacterium. This could suggest that bison, and/or other bovids, may be susceptible to comorbidities or to co-infections in the presence of SARS-CoV-2. An increase in relative abundance of opportunistic respiratory pathogens in the nasal cavity following SARS-CoV-2 infection may have negative implications for bison health even if the animals exhibit a low level of susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection itself. Indeed, a pattern of increased opportunistic pathogens in the human nasopharyngeal microbiota following SARS-CoV-2 infection has also been observed (Edouard et al. 2018; Hoque et al. 2021; Rhoades et al. 2021).

Bison are one of the few bovids that have shown to be permissive to SARS-CoV-2 infection, thus far. Characterizing the variable immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in different host species offers valuable insight into differences in susceptibility, as well as transcriptomic profiles that may contribute to establishing biomarkers or improving surveillance and diagnostics.

Supplementary Material

jkag231_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the National Animal Disease Center (NADC) for their support in animal care throughout this study. In particular, we thank Dr. Rebecca Cox, Derek Vermeer, Jonathan Gardner, Tiffany Williams, Emma Prat, Emma Hay, and Jared Peterson for their dedicated assistance with animal husbandry and care. We also extend our appreciation to Sue Osorio, Shelly Zimmerman, and Sarah Anderson for their excellent technical support. Additionally, we thank the University of Illinois Sequencing and Genomics Core, especially Chris Wright and Alvaro Hernandez for their excellent sample care and sequencing.

Contributor Information

Bruna Petry, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Ames, IA 50010, United States; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, United States.

Paola M Boggiatto, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Ames, IA 50010, United States.

Alexandra Buckley, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Ames, IA 50010, United States.

Eric D Cassmann, Department of Veterinary Pathology, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA 50011, United States.

Kaitlyn Sarlo Davila, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Ames, IA 50010, United States.

Steven C Olsen, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Ames, IA 50010, United States.

Luis Guilherme Virgilio Fernandes, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Ames, IA 50010, United States; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, United States.

Bienvenido Tibbs-Cortes, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Ames, IA 50010, United States.

Faith M Rahic-Seggerman, Interdepartmental Microbiology Program, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, United States.

Mitchell V Palmer, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Ames, IA 50010, United States.

Ellie J Putz, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Ames, IA 50010, United States.

Data availability

Raw data, microbiome and RNA sequencing data, generated and analyzed during this study are available under BioProject PRJNA1226260, at “https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1226260” (Leinonen et al. 2010). All other data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files). Pipelines used for the analysis are available in Supplementary Files 1 and 2.

Supplemental material available at G3 online.

Funding

This research was supported by intramural funding from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and by American Rescue Plan (ARP) funds through an interagency agreement between the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)Wildlife Services (WS), and USDA ARS CRIS #3625-32000-232-00D. Additional support was provided through an appointment to the ARS Research Participation Program, administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) via an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and USDA. ORISE is managed by ORAU under DOE contract number DE-SC0014664. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policies or positions of the USDA, DOE, or ORAU/ORISE.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Author contributions

B.P. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. P.M.B. participated in study design, performed the animal experiments, collected samples, analyzed data, and reviewed the manuscript. A.B. participated in study design, prepared the virus for infections, assisted with animal work, sample collection, and sample processing. E.D.C. participated in study design and collected samples. K.S.D. analyzed the data and discussion. S.C.O. performed animal experiments and collected samples. L.G.V.F. prepared the graphical images and contributed to the discussion. B.T.-C. contributed to sample collection and analyzed microbiome data. F.M.R.-S. contributed to sample collection. M.V.P. obtained funding, managed projects, participated in study design, performed animal experiments, and collected samples. E.J.P. participated in the study design, processed samples, analyzed data, and helped write and review the manuscript.

Literature cited

  1. An  H  et al.  2025. Persistent lymphocytopenia in convalescent patients with COVID-19: dysregulated B cell, CD4+ T cell, and treg compartments in 7–12% of moderate-severe cases. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 15:. 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1693743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ardalan  M  et al.  2024. Bison, elk, and other captive wildlife species humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2. Animals. 14:2829. 10.3390/ani14192829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boggiatto  PM  et al.  2024. Persistence of viral RNA in North American elk experimentally infected with an ancestral strain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Sci Rep. 14:11171. 10.1038/s41598-024-61414-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buergelt  CD  et al.  2000. The pathology of spontaneous paratuberculosis in the North American bison (Bison bison). Vet Pathol. 37:428–438. 10.1354/vp.37-5-428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Centeno-Martinez  RE  et al.  2022. Identification of bovine respiratory disease through the nasal microbiome. Anim Microbiome. 4:15. 10.1186/s42523-022-00167-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Centeno-Martinez  RE  et al.  2023. Dynamics of the nasopharyngeal microbiome of apparently healthy calves and those with clinical symptoms of bovine respiratory disease from disease diagnosis to recovery. Front Vet Sci. 10:1297158. 10.3389/fvets.2023.1297158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cunha  CW  et al.  2012. Ovine herpesvirus 2 infection in American bison: virus and host dynamics in the development of sheep-associated malignant catarrhal fever. Vet Microbiol. 159:307–319. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Damas  J  et al.  2020. Broad host range of SARS-CoV-2 predicted by comparative and structural analysis of ACE2 in vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 117:22311–22322. 10.1073/pnas.2010146117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis  NM, Proctor  DM, Holmes  SP, Relman  DA, Callahan  BJ. 2018. Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data. Microbiome. 6:226. 10.1186/s40168-018-0605-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dediego  ML, Nogales  A, Martinez-Sobrido  L, Topham  DJ. 2019. Interferon-induced protein 44 interacts with cellular fk506-binding protein 5, negatively regulates host antiviral responses, and supports virus replication. MBio. 10:e01839-19. 10.1128/mBio.01839-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Di Tommaso  P  et al.  2017. Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat Biotechnol. 35:316–319. 10.1038/nbt.3820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dobin  A  et al.  2013. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 29:15–21. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ducommun  S  et al.  2024. Mustn1 is a smooth muscle cell-secreted microprotein that modulates skeletal muscle extracellular matrix composition. Mol Metab. 82:101912. 10.1016/j.molmet.2024.101912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Edouard  S  et al.  2018. The nasopharyngeal microbiota in patients with viral respiratory tract infections is enriched in bacterial pathogens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 37:1725–1733. 10.1007/s10096-018-3305-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Engen  PA  et al.  2021. Nasopharyngeal microbiota in SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients. Biol Proced Online. 23:10. 10.1186/s12575-021-00148-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ewels  PA  et al.  2020. The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines. Nat Biotechnol. 38:276–278. 10.1038/s41587-020-0439-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ferrara  G  et al.  2023. Seroprevalence and risk factors for bovine coronavirus infection among dairy cattle and water buffalo in Campania Region, Southern Italy. Animals. 13:772. 10.3390/ani13050772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gass  JD  et al.  2022. A standardized instrument quantifying risk factors associated with bi-directional transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other zoonotic pathogens: the COVID-19 Human-Animal Interactions Survey (CHAIS). One Heal. 15:100422. 10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hale  VL  et al.  2022. SARS-CoV-2 infection in free-ranging white-tailed deer. Nature. 602:481–486. 10.1038/s41586-021-04353-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hoque  MN  et al.  2021. SARS-CoV-2 infection reduces human nasopharyngeal commensal microbiome with inclusion of pathobionts. Sci Rep. 11:24042. 10.1038/s41598-021-03245-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jing  Y  et al.  2021. SARS-CoV-2 infection causes immunodeficiency in recovered patients by downregulating CD19 expression in B cells via enhancing B-cell metabolism. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 6:345. 10.1038/s41392-021-00749-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Larska  M, Tomana  J, Krzysiak  MK, Pomorska-Mól  M, Socha  W. 2024. Prevalence of coronaviruses in European bison (Bison bonasus) in Poland. Sci Rep. 14:12928. 10.1038/s41598-024-63717-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Leinonen  R, Sugawara  H, Shumway  M; International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration. 2010. The sequence read archive. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:D19–D21. 10.1093/nar/gkq1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Liao  Y, Smyth  GK, Shi  W. 2014. FeatureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 30:923–930. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Love  MI, Huber  W, Anders  S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15:550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Man  WH, De Steenhuijsen Piters  WAA, Bogaert  D. 2017. The microbiota of the respiratory tract: gatekeeper to respiratory health. Nat Rev Microbiol. 15:259–270. 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Martins  M  et al.  2022. From deer-to-deer: SARS-CoV-2 is efficiently transmitted and presents broad tissue tropism and replication sites in white-tailed deer. PLoS Pathog. 18:e1010197. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. McDaneld  TG  et al.  2022. Detection of Mycoplasma bovirhinis and bovine coronavirus in an outbreak of bovine respiratory disease in nursing beef calves. Front Microbiomes. 1:1051241. 10.3389/frmbi.2022.1051241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. McMullen  C, Alexander  TW, Léguillette  R, Workentine  M, Timsit  E. 2020. Topography of the respiratory tract bacterial microbiota in cattle. Microbiome. 8:91. 10.1186/s40168-020-00869-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. McMurdie  PJ, Holmes  S. 2013. Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One. 8:e61217. 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Menghwar  H  et al.  2025. Comparative innate immune responses of bison and cattle to Mannheimia haemolytica wildtype and LPS sialylation-deficient mutant strains. Res Vet Sci. 193:105764. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Olsen  SC. 2010. Brucellosis in the United States: role and significance of wildlife reservoirs. Vaccine. 28:F73–F76. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.03.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Palmer  MV  et al.  2021. Susceptibility of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to SARS-CoV-2. J Virol. 95:10-1128. 10.1128/jvi.00083-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Palmer  MV  et al.  2025. Permissiveness of American bison to infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. Sci Rep. 15:33636. 10.1038/s41598-025-10100-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pan  H  et al.  2020. Interferon-induced protein 44 correlated with immune infiltration serves as a potential prognostic indicator in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Front Oncol. 10:557157. 10.3389/fonc.2020.557157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Petry  B  et al.  2025. Peripheral transcriptional responses to experimental SARS-CoV-2 inoculation in North American elk cows and calves. BMC Genomics. 26:781. 10.1186/s12864-025-11956-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Register  KB  et al.  2021. Serological evidence for historical and present-day exposure of North American bison to Mycoplasma bovis. BMC Vet Res. 17:18. 10.1186/s12917-020-02717-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rhoades  NS  et al.  2021. Acute SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with an increased abundance of bacterial pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the nose. Cell Rep. 36:109637. 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. SAS Institute . 1999. The MULTTEST procedure, SAS/STAT 9.22 user's guide. p. 2313–2356.
  40. SAS Institute Inc . 2009. The GLIMMIX procedure, SAS/STAT 9.2 user's guide. p. 2075–2428.
  41. Schloss  PD  et al.  2009. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 75:7537–7541. 10.1128/AEM.01541-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sitharam  N  et al.  2024. SARS-CoV-2 genomic epidemiology dashboards: a review of functionality and technological frameworks for the public health response. Genes (Basel). 15:876. 10.3390/genes15070876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Taus  NS  et al.  2014. Malignant catarrhal fever in American bison (Bison bison) experimentally infected with alcelaphine herpesvirus 2. Vet Microbiol. 172:318–322. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ulrich  L, Wernike  K, Hoffmann  D, Mettenleiter  TC, Beer  M. 2020. Experimental infection of cattle with SARS-CoV-2. Emerg Infect Dis. 26:2979–2981. 10.3201/eid2612.203799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Villamayor  L  et al.  2023. Interferon alpha inducible protein 6 is a negative regulator of innate immune responses by modulating RIG-I activation. Front Immunol. 14:1105309. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1105309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang  S, Fan  H, Bai  J. 2025. NKD2 as a mediator of IFIX antioncogene-induced wnt signalling and epithelial–mesenchymal transition in human OSCC. J Cell Mol Med. 29:e70342. 10.1111/jcmm.70342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Willis  A, Bunge  J. 2015. Estimating diversity via frequency ratios. Biometrics. 71:1042–1049. 10.1111/biom.12332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Willis  AD, Martin  BD. 2022. Estimating diversity in networked ecological communities. Biostatistics. 23:207–222. 10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. World Health Organization . 2023. SARS-COV-2 in animals—Situation Report 22. WOAH. Geneva: World Health Organization. p. 20–22. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/367912
  50. Zhou  G, Zhang  L, Shao  S. 2024. The application of MARCO for immune regulation and treatment. Mol Biol Rep. 51:246. 10.1007/s11033-023-09201-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jkag231_Supplementary_Data

Data Availability Statement

Raw data, microbiome and RNA sequencing data, generated and analyzed during this study are available under BioProject PRJNA1226260, at “https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1226260” (Leinonen et al. 2010). All other data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files). Pipelines used for the analysis are available in Supplementary Files 1 and 2.

Supplemental material available at G3 online.


Articles from G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES