Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Nov 5.
Published in final edited form as: Front Mar Sci. 2026 Oct 13;13:1871379. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2026.1871379

Better together? Microbial communities associated with enhanced growth of the invasive seagrass Halophila stipulacea when mixed with a native Mediterranean seagrass Cymodocea nodosa

Emma Hoza-Frederick 1, Sergio Martínez-Campos 2,3, Paul H Barber 4, Marlen I Vasquez 5, Vasileios Fotopoulos 6, Chrystalla Antoniou 7, Katerina Drakou 5, Filipa Godoy-Vitorino 7, Kelcie L Chiquillo 1,*
PMCID: PMC13733596  NIHMSID: NIHMS2216729  PMID: 42985593

Abstract

Introduction:

Microorganisms are increasingly recognized as important contributors to the invasion success of introduced species into new environments. The globally invasive seagrass Halophila stipulacea flourishes in mixed species assemblages with native seagrasses, where it exhibits enhanced growth, while, in contrast, native seagrasses in mixed environments experience reduced growth. Here, we hypothesize that microbes may support the success of invasive seagrass in mixed Mediterranean environments.

Methods:

We analyzed 16S rRNA genes to characterize phyllosphere microbial diversity associated with the Mediterranean-native seagrass Cymodocea nodosa and the invasive H. stipulacea when grown alone or together, alongside biochemical, morphological, and sediment nutrient measurements.

Results:

Overall, C. nodosa in monoculture harbored a microbiome exhibiting higher ASV richness and a distinct community composition than H. stipulacea. Variation in bacterial diversity associated with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and internode length suggests that microbial communities of the native seagrass might be shaped by its stress-related physiological condition. Conversely, H. stipulacea’s microbiome was most abundant in mixed environments, with bacteria significantly reduced in monoculture, and bacterial diversity loosely associated with growth, suggesting that bacterial diversity patterns associated with H. stipulacea vary across competition contexts and may be associated with differences in performance in mixed environments.

Discussion/Conclusion:

Our findings suggest that invasive H. stipulacea in the Mediterranean Sea is capable of harboring distinct bacterial assemblages that may be associated with growth patterns observed when co-occurring with the native seagrass C. nodosa. Future work should center on the mechanisms driving H. stipulacea bacterial communities and investigating whether H. stipulacea actively determines its own microbiome, or whether it passively acquires its microbiome by environmental variables.

Keywords: 16S rRNA, competition, Cymodocea nodosa, Halophila stipulacea, invasion, Mediterranean, microbes, seagrass

1. Introduction

Microbial communities are increasingly recognized as key players in plant invasion dynamics and competition (Rudgers et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2010; Policelli et al., 2019; Elsheikh et al., 2021; Dawkins et al., 2022). They are essential to all forms of life and vital for providing resources to their hosts (Rout and Callaway, 2012; Dawson and Schrama, 2016), as well as driving processes that sustain ecosystems and the planet (Policelli et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2020; Elsheikh et al., 2021; Hesse et al., 2021; Dawkins et al., 2022). Microbes can influence invasion success and plant competition through several key functions, including nutrient acquisition, stress tolerance, pathogen protection and resource availability (Inderjit and van der Putten, 2010; Dawson and Schrama, 2016; Dawkins et al., 2022). These functions are mediated by mechanisms such as the production of phytotoxins, phytohormones, secondary metabolites, disruption of native symbioses (Cipollini et al., 2012), and shifts in microbial communities that can suppress the growth of their competitors (Fang et al., 2022; Dar et al., 2024).

Studies of plant-microbe interactions in marine environments are much scarcer than those in terrestrial environments, yet suggest that microbes can be important factors in successful species invasions (Funk and Vitousek, 2007). For example, Gribben et al. (2018) found that sediment microbial communities influenced the growth of Caulerpa taxifolia fragments, with intact microbial communities from native seagrass sediments reducing fragment growth, while microbial communities associated with C. taxifolia sediments increased fragment growth, suggesting that sediment microbes can differentially influence invasion outcomes depending on their origin. Additionally, Aires et al. (2013) used microbes to track the invasion source of Caulerpa racemosa, suggesting that associated microbes may assist its acclimation to novel habitats. However, interactions between the host and its associated microbial communities can shift during the invasion process. For example, Saha et al. (2016) demonstrated that the macroalga Gracilaria vermiculophylla becomes vulnerable to epibionts from its native range, but showed increased resistance to epibionts in its invaded range. Growing evidence demonstrates that seagrasses’ microbial communities—particularly those associated with roots, rhizomes, and leaves—play a pivotal role in determining performance, nutrient acquisition, and responses to environmental change (Tarquinio et al., 2019).

Microbes confer beneficial advantages to seagrasses, including enhanced nutrient acquisition, protection against pathogens, biofouling, toxins, and oxidative stress; and promotion of plant growth and developmental processes (Ugarelli et al., 2017). Microbial mediation may help explain patterns of establishment and spread across seagrasses among the three known invasive seagrass species—Zostera japonica, a highly invasive seagrass in the Pacific Northwest whose associated microbes are detoxifying and denitrifying, growth-promoting, nitrogen-fixing, and epibiont-inhibiting (Wojahn, 2016; Crump et al., 2018); Halophila ovalis, whose associated microbes can fix carbon and nitrogen, cycle sulfur, promote growth and stress tolerance, and degrade C1 products like methanol and methane (Yan et al., 2021); and the globally invasive Halophila stipulacea (Lipkin, 1975; Harrison and Bigley, 1982; Short et al., 2010). Originating from the Red Sea and Indian Ocean, H. stipulacea is a Lessepsian migrant that colonized the Mediterranean Sea 150 years ago after the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869. First observed in the Mediterranean in 1894 (Willette et al., 2014), H. stipulacea is believed to have subsequently been introduced to the Caribbean Sea via boat (Winters et al., 2020), with first sightings in the Caribbean reported in Grenada in 2002 (Willette et al., 2014).

As an opportunistic, phenotypically plastic species, H. stipulacea’s ability to tolerate varying light, depth, temperature, salinity, and hydrodynamic regimes (Rotini et al., 2017) has been associated with its high invasion success, although less work has been done examining how H. stipulacea’s microbial communities might influence this plasticity. To date, most evidence supports the host generalist hypothesis, which posits that H. stipulacea’s ability to adapt to the conditions of its invaded range comes from effectively exploiting the microbial communities of its invaded range (Parker, 2001; Aires et al., 2023), which has been proposed to assist its competition against native seagrasses in mixed communities. In syntopic populations in the Mediterranean Sea, Conte et al. (2023) found that H. stipulacea exhibited unaffected density and largely unaffected bacterial diversity when growing next to the native seagrass, while the native seagrass exhibited decreased density and bacterial diversity. In the Caribbean Sea, Aires et al. (2021) identified bacteria that putatively promoted growth, nutrient acquisition, stress and saline tolerance, detoxification, quorum sensing inhibition, and epiphyte degradation, potentially enabling H. stipulacea to thrive in nonnative territories. Further support comes from Winters et al. (2023), who found that Caribbean H. stipulacea exhibited higher growth rates and biomass than native Red and Mediterranean Seas populations, suggesting a shift in H. stipulacea’s physiology between native and invaded territories, which could potentially be microbe mediated. Put together, positive impacts on the seagrass holobiont, the relationship between microbes and their seagrass hosts, might enable invaders to be more effective competitors than their rivals by enhancing seagrass ecological functions (Ugarelli et al., 2017; Tarquinio et al., 2019; Conte et al., 2021).

H. stipulacea microbial communities may be impacted by its intrinsic characteristics, its environment, or the act of competition itself. It is well understood that plants can mediate their own microbial communities through various genomic, metabolic, and structural strategies (Pascale et al., 2020; Barnes et al., 2025). Cúcio et al. (2016) found that seagrass-associated microbial communities differed among host compartments at local scales, whereas broaderscale patterns were associated with environmental conditions. Similarly, Mejia et al. (2016) observed that H. stipulacea’s epiphytic bacterial communities varied along a depth gradient in the Gulf of Aqaba, and Rotini et al. (2017) found that variation in abiotic factors, including depth, was associated with differences in H. stipulacea microbial community structure.

Microbial communities may also vary in association with plant competition. In terrestrial systems, competition between native and invasive grasses can restructure rhizosphere communities, sometimes amplifying competitive asymmetries (LaForgia et al., 2022; LaForgia et al., 2022), while in crop–weed systems, microbial shifts can mediate allelopathic suppression (Mishra et al., 2013; Kohli et al., 2024). In marine systems, competition between macroalgae (Egan et al., 2017; Brunet et al. 2025) and coral species (Teplitski et al., 2016) has been linked to changes in surface-associated microbial communities. Taken together, these studies suggest microbiome communities can vary in association with competitive interactions. In seagrasses specifically, experimental studies have shown that root and sediment-associated microbial communities can affect plant performance under environmental stress and nutrient limitation (Fuggle et al., 2023; Jongen et al., 2026).

Despite evidence from the controlled competition experiment demonstrating enhanced performance of invasive H. stipulacea when growing with native seagrass (Chiquillo et al., 2022), the role of microbes in shaping these interactions remains unresolved. Across both the Mediterranean and Caribbean Seas, H. stipulacea tends to dominate mixed assemblages, exhibiting enhanced growth when co-occurring with native seagrasses compared to when it grows alone—often to the detriment of native species (Chiquillo et al., 2022). In contrast, native seagrasses Syringodium filiforme and Cymodocea nodosa lost shoots when grown with H. stipulacea at full density and only showed positive growth in monoculture. Invasive species capable of driving their own invasions are typically superior competitors (Fleming and Dibble, 2015). However, given the importance of microbes to plants (Barrow et al., 2008), microbial interactions may also contribute to the competitive performance of H. stipulacea. In this study, we examine how microbial communities differ when H. stipulacea is grown alone or together with native seagrasses, previously associated with enhanced H. stipulacea performance, and discuss whether the observed patterns are consistent with (1) context-dependent variation in H. stipulacea-associated microbial communities, (2) stochastic processes shaped by the environment, or (3) differences in microbial communities associated with H. stipulacea across growth conditions that may be associated with physiological responses.

The objective of this study is to understand whether microbial communities differ across competition contexts that are already known to enhance Halophila stipulacea performance in mixed Mediterranean seagrass communities. Using a controlled competition experiment, we compared microbial diversity, community composition, and biochemical indicators in both the invasive H. stipulacea and the native Cymodocea nodosa under monoculture and mixed conditions. We focus on phyllosphere-associated microbial communities, given that shoot dynamics responded strongly when the seagrasses grew mixed and alone. We hypothesized that (1) H. stipulacea would exhibit differences in microbial community composition between mixed species communities and monoculture, and (2) microbial assemblages would correlate with physiological traits such as oxidative stress and shoot growth. We therefore assessed microbial alpha and beta diversity, differential taxon abundance, and associations with environmental descriptors, interpreting these patterns as correlative with plant performance and physiological state. Our findings offer new insights into marine plant–microbe interactions and generate testable hypotheses regarding potential microbial-mediated mechanisms that may contribute to biological invasions in seagrass ecosystems.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Experimental design of species assemblages

To examine associations between microbial communities and seagrass species interactions across treatments, we expanded upon a previously published experiment (Chiquillo et al., 2022), which manipulated seagrass community composition (monocultures and mixed communities) and density in controlled mesocosms to assess interactions between the native Cymodocea nodosa and invasive Halophila stipulacea. The experiment included four treatments with ten mesocosm replicates each: (1) native and invasive grown together at natural densities, (2) native and invasive together at reduced densities, (3) invasive monoculture, and (4) native monoculture. All mesocosms were initiated from naturally mixed seagrass communities containing both H. stipulacea and C. nodosa collected from naturally co-occurring donor beds. On SCUBA, intact seagrass cores were extracted with clear polycarbonate coring tubes (30 cm height × 7.2 cm diameter), each containing whole plants and associated epiphytes. Two intact cores were placed into each 24-L flow-through cylindrical mesocosm. Additional sterilized sand was added to standardize sediment depth (~15 cm) and allow continued rhizome expansion within each mesocosm.

Experimental treatments were then established by selectively modifying species composition from these naturally mixed communities. In the natural density treatment, sediments were disturbed to rhizome depth to mimic the disturbance associated with treatment establishment, but no seagrass tissue was removed. Invasive monocultures were created by removing C. nodosa, native monocultures by removing H. stipulacea, and reduced-density mixed treatments were established by removing approximately half of the shoots of both species while maintaining their co-occurrence. At the start of the experiment H. stipulacea averaged 5.9 ± 0.1 shoots, while the native seagrass began on average with 3.0 ± 0.2 shoots.

Experimental units were maintained in flow-through mesocosms for six weeks under natural conditions, from October 16 to December 3, 2018 at the Marine Aquaculture Center within the Fisheries Aquatic Research Center, Larnaka, Cyprus.

In this study, we investigate the microbial diversity and composition of the phyllosphere and seagrass tissue from each of these experimental treatments to test whether seagrass community structure and density impact associated microbial communities.

2.2. Plant descriptors

To evaluate how plant physiological responses shift in response to seagrass competition, as described in Chiquillo et al. (2022), samples were collected from both H. stipulacea and C. nodosa at the end of the competition experiment to record the biochemical, morphological (e.g., number of shoots), and soil variables. We measured photosynthetic leaf pigments, indirectly linked to photosynthetic activity in each treatment, by extracting photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b, total carotenoids) from 50 mg of blade tissue per treatment and species, prepared as composite samples from at least 10 randomly selected leaves following modified methods (Supplementary Table S1). Specifically, we determined chlorophyll a and b concentrations (mg/g of fresh weight, FW) from lyophilized samples after DMSO extractions, recording average absorbances (A) at 470, 652, 665, and 750 nm from duplicate readings on a Spectroquant Pharo 100 spectrophotometer. Carotenoids and chlorophyll concentrations were estimated using equations proposed by Sims and Gamon 2002.

To investigate if competition leads to oxidative stress, we measured lipid peroxidation as an indicator of cellular damage. We tested for both hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) using tissue from five haphazardly selected blades from each mesocosm replicate per treatment and species; these blades were pooled to create three composite samples per treatment (~ 4.1-4.9 mg). While pooling reduces resolution at the individual blade level, it also minimizes variability among blades within each mesocosm replicate. Lipid peroxidation was determined from the measurement of MDA content resulting from the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) reaction (Minotti and Aust, 1987) using an extinction coefficient of 155 mM-1 cm-1. Hydrogen peroxide was quantified using the KI method, as described by Velikova et al. (2000).

Next, to determine whether growing conditions impacted seagrass growth, we measured growth by calculating the difference in the number of shoots (final (F) minus initial (I)) over the 6-week experiment from Chiquillo et al. (2022), which we used as a standardized proxy for vegetative growth, as well as above and belowground biomass and internode length taken from cores at the end of the experiment.

To determine nutrient levels in the sediment, we cored 50 mL falcon tubes in random locations within each replicate of each mesocosm and combined them to create a composite sediment sample for each treatment before and after the experiment. Additionally, to measure dissolved nutrients in the water, we collected five water samples from each mesocosm before and after the experiment. We filtered water using a vacuum pump and using 0.2uM pore size. We used Nitrite test kit (#1.14776.002), and Nitrate test in seawater (kit #1.14942.001). Extracts were read twice using Spectroquant Pharo 100 spectrophotometer.

2.3. Bacterial communities: DNA extraction and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of seagrass-associated bacterial community

To investigate how microbial communities might change based on its response to intraspecific seagrass competition conducted by Chiquillo et al. (2022), we sampled seagrass phyllospheres at two time points: the onset and conclusion of the experiment. At the start of the experiment, we grouped by treatment and mesocosm origin, collected one blade per species from each of the 10 experimental units, and then pooled blades into four composite samples per treatment. In the full mixed-density treatment (where both native and invasive grew together in natural density); in this treatment only sediment was disturbed to mimic the disturbance of the other treatments, but blades were not removed (n=16). At the end of the experiment, we again collected one blade of each experimental unit for each species from each treatment. Blades were grouped together and then randomly redistributed into four composite samples, tissue originating from multiple independent, experimental mesocosm units (n=24). This compositing strategy preserves treatment-level inference while reducing within-replicate technical variation among mesocosms; however, it does not resolve mesocosm-level heterogeneity.

To characterize bacterial communities, each composite sample was scraped from all the epibionts (including small pieces of tissue blade) used for DNA extraction. Tissue blades were gently scraped into sterile Petri dishes using forceps and sterile razors. Each sample was first washed with 10 ml of washing solution (200 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 10 mM EDTA, and 0.24% Triton X-100; Kadivar and Stapleton 2003). During the scraping process, some tissue fragments were also released into the wash. The resulting supernatant was vortexed (3× 30 s) to detach and collect the bacteria. The plant parts were then removed with sterile tweezers, and the remaining solution was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 20 min to obtain the recovered pellet, which may have contained residual plant material, for subsequent DNA extraction using the Qiagen Power Soil® DNA isolation kit (Qiagen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. A single blank DNA extraction using sterile water was conducted alongside sample extractions as a contamination control and carried through downstream processing.

To characterize the diversity and relative abundance of prokaryotes in the different treatments, we sequenced 16S rRNA V4 using primers 515F (GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA) and 806 R (GGACTACNVGGGTWTCTAAT) (Caporaso et al., 2011) as per the Earth Microbiome Project protocol https://earthmicrobiome.org/protocols-and-standards/16s/. Each sample was amplified in triplicate 25 uL reactions, using the Qiagen Multiplex PCR kit. Thermocycling parameters began with a denaturation step of 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 45 sec, annealing at 50 °C for 60 sec, and extending at 72 °C for 90 sec, with a final extension of 72 °C for 10 min. Once validated on an agarose gel, triplicate reactions were pooled and cleaned using Agencourt AMPure magnetic beads. Further, we evaluated taxonomic composition with morphological, biochemical traits, and soil nutrient (nitrate/nitrite) assays, allowing us to identify microbial indicators associated with competitive outcomes.

2.4. Sequencing and bioinformatics

Pooled PCR samples were dual-indexed using the Illumina Nextera XT Indexing kit and then cleaned a second time with AMPure magnetic beads, including a PCR negative control (blank) to detect and remove any incidental DNA contamination introduced during the process. Indexed samples were then quantified using a Qubit dsDNA BR kit from Invitrogen to ensure that samples were pooled into equimolar ratios. The pooled library was subsequently sent for sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq v3 with a 20% PhiX at the TCGB core at UCLA (300 bp x 2).

To conduct quality control, amplicon sequence variant (ASV) taxonomy assignment, and community diversity analyses, we processed sequencing data using the QIIME 2 (v. 2024.5.0) microbiome data science platform (Bolyen et al., 2019). Briefly, we demultiplexed and denoised raw sequence data using the DADA2 pipeline (Callahan et al., 2016) and merged the output into a feature table for analysis. Sequences were then trimmed at 10 bp and truncated at 270 and 215 bp for the forward and reverse directions, respectively. Next, ASVs were assigned taxonomy using a naive Bayes taxonomy classifier trained on the SILVA v138.1 SSU NR99 database trimmed to the 515F/806R region (Quast et al., 2013), employing clustering at 99% similarity, and ASVs represented by fewer than 10 total reads were removed prior to downstream analyses. Rarefaction curves were used to determine whether we measure sufficient sequencing depth given the diversity within the sample. We removed reads that matched archaea, chloroplasts, eukaryotes, and mitochondria to ensure we analyzed only reads belonging to bacteria. Subsequent analyses were conducted in R (v.4.4.1) (R Core Team, 2024), using the `qiime2R` package to translate QIIME 2 artifacts (Bisanz, 2025).

16S rRNA microbial community composition in the phyllosphere was analyzed for both native and invasive seagrass species. Using observed ASVs, we calculated alpha diversity using Shannon diversity and Pielou evenness metrics with the `otuSummary` package (Yang, 2023). Differences in alpha-diversity metrics among groups were assessed using Kruskal–Wallis to evaluate treatment effects on these metrics. For alpha- and beta-diversity analyses, samples were rarefied to a sequencing depth of 1,500 reads per sample.

Using the same rarefied data set, beta diversity was assessed using Bray–Curtis dissimilarities. Community compositional patterns were visualized with non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) using the vegan package in R (Oksanen et al., 2025). Overall differences in community composition among groups were tested using PERMANOVA with 999 permutations, and ANOSIM was used as a complementary multivariate test. Pairwise PERMANOVA comparisons were conducted using pairwiseAdonis (Martinez Arbizu, 2020) with 999 permutations. Where applicable, P values from pairwise comparisons were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure.

Because PERMANOVA can be sensitive to differences in within-group dispersion, homogeneity of multivariate dispersion was assessed separately using betadisper and permutation testing. To further evaluate whether observed differences reflected unequal multivariate dispersion among groups, we conducted a permutational test of homogeneity of multivariate dispersions ‘PERMDISP’ with 999 permutations (Anderson and Walsh, 2013). This allowed us to distinguish differences in community composition among groups from differences in within-group heterogeneity.

We created a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot to explore how environmental factors, such as our plant descriptors, influenced bacterial community composition in our samples using the full n=18 samples. The plot and covariate statistics were produced using ‘vegan’, ‘ecodist’, and 999 permutations (Oksanen et al., 2025; Goslee and Urban, 2007), after which we ran PERMANOVA and an Analysis of similarity matrix (ANOSIM) tests to detect overall group differences and a pairwise PERMANOVA test to detect pairwise differences with ‘pairwiseAdonis’ (Martinez Arbizu, 2020) with 999 permutations. Core microbiomes were determined in R as taxa appearing within at least 80% of samples, as done in Aires et al. (2021). Venn diagrams comparing the core microbiomes of our samples were generated using the ‘venn’ package (Dusa, 2022). Heatmaps were then produced using ‘pheatmap’ (Kolde 2015) to visualize sample clustering and identify which taxa within the core microbiomes were most abundant. To visualize bacterial compositions of our samples, we created bar plots of relative taxonomic abundance using ‘ggplot2’ (Wickham et al., 2025).

To evaluate the robustness of diversity patterns to the normalization approach, we applied Scaling with Ranked Subsampling (SRS) using the q2-srs plugin in QIIME 2 (Heidrich et al., 2021). SRS normalization was performed on the feature table using default parameters, and rarefaction-comparison curves were generated to assess consistency with rarefaction-based approaches. Alpha diversity (Shannon diversity and Pielou evenness) and beta diversity (Bray–Curtis distances) were recalculated from the SRS-normalized table. Statistical analyses, including Kruskal–Wallis tests, PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and betadisper, were conducted as described above to allow direct comparison with rarefied results.

To identify associations between microbial taxa and experimental variables, we used Microbiome Multivariable Associations with Linear Models (MaAsLin 2; Mallick et al., 2021), an R package designed to assess multivariable associations by integrating microbial data with a broad spectrum of experimental factors correcting for multiple comparisons. Taxon relative abundances were modeled as a function of treatment and associated metadata variables. Covariates included biochemical (e.g., H2O2, MDA, chlorophylls) parameters, morphological (e.g., internode length, number of shoots, biomass), and environmental factors. No additional filtering was performed. No additional prevalence or abundance filtering was applied before the MaAsLin2 analysis, and it was conducted on all 18 samples. Relative abundance data were used as input, and zero values were handled using MaAsLin2 default procedures (log transformation with the addition of a pseudo-count). Multiple testing correction was performed using the false discovery rate (FDR) (Benjamini-Hochberg), and association was considered significant using FDR q-values of 0.05. Microbial relative abundance was modeled as a function of treatment and associated metadata variable. Prior to model fitting, covariates included biochemical (e.g., H2O2), morphological (e.g., shoot number, internode length), and experimental treatment variables, depending on species-specific analyses were considered. All models were run using MaAsLin2 with default settings unless otherwise specified. To assess robustness given the small effective sample size, we conducted an additional sensitivity analysis using a reduced predictor set. For native samples, models included H2O2 and internode length as predictors, while for invasive samples, models included shoot number. Results from reduced models were qualitatively consistent with the full models, supporting the robustness of identified associations.

Taxonomic identities were used to infer potential ecological functions based on previously reported associations in the literature; however, 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing does not directly assess functional genes or microbial metabolic activity.

3. Results

3.1. Plant descriptors

Native C. nodosa had higher photosynthetic pigment levels, including chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids, when grown in either natural or reduced mixed communities than when grown alone (Table 1). This pattern was opposite for the invasive H. stipulacea, resulting in significant treatment x species interactions for chlorophyll a (p=0.0042), chlorophyll b (p=0.0175), and carotenoids (p=0.003); Supplementary Table S2). Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), a marker of cellular stress, showed a significant species effect, not between species and treatment (LME; df=12; p < 0.0001; Supplementary Table S2). Overall, H2O2 concentrations were more than sevenfold higher in the native species (mean = 4.18 ± 0.42 SE μmol/g) than in the invasive species (mean = 0.62 ± 0.09 SE μmol/g), indicating substantially greater oxidative stress in the native seagrass. In contrast, the native seagrass C. nodosa had higher MDA levels than the invasive seagrass, resulting in a significant treatment x species interaction (LME; df=12, p = 0.049, Supplementary Table S2). Average MDA levels in native C. nodosa were 9.18 ± 0.84μmol/g, and for invasive H. stipulacea was 7.83 ± 0.34 μmol/g.

Table 1.

Averages of biochemical, morphological, and soil parameters measured across native and invasive seagrass species under six treatments: native mixed, native reduced mixed, native alone, invasive mixed, invasive reduced mixed, and invasive alone, and the standard error.

Parameter Native
mixed
Native reduced
mixed
Native
alone
Invasive
mixed
Invasive reduced
mixed
Invasive
alone
Chl a* (mg/FW) 0.006 ± 0.002 0.007 ± 0.000 0.005 ± 0.001 0.005 ± 0.001 0.003 ± 0.001 0.004 ± 0.001
Chl b * (mg/FW) 0.003 ± 0.001 0.004 ± 0.002 0.003 ± 0.001 0.003 ± 0.000 0.002 ± 0.001 0.002 ± 0.001
Chl a / Chl b 2.11 ± 0.84 1.75 ± 0.58 1.75 ± 0.43 1.56 ± 0.19 1.56 ± 0.77 1.89 ± 0.54
Car * 0.002 ± 0.001 0.002 ± 0.000 0.001 ± 0.001 0.002 ± 0.001 0.001 ± 0.000 0.001 ± 0.001
MDA* (μmol/g) 9.33 ± 1.76 7.67 ± 0.49 10.56 ± 1.79 7.27 ± 0.35 8.45 ± 1.22 7.78 ± 0.18
H2O2* (μmol/g) 3.73 ± 1.05 3.80 ± 0.42 5.01 ± 0.90 0.49 ± 0.26 0.59 ± 0.20 0.78 ± 0.06
Change in number of shoots −1 ± 0.4 0.2 ± 0.1 1.7 ± .1 3.7 ± 1.3 4.3 ± 1.5 0.5 ± 1.00
Aboveground biomass (g) 0.18 ± 0.03 0.22 ± .04 0.55 ± 0.06 0.46 ± 0.08 0.37 ± 0.08 0.38 ± 0.06
Belowground biomass (g) 1.92 ± 0.35 1.71 ± 0.36 3.15 ± 0.74 2.22 ± 0.39 1.79 ± 0.26 1.32 ± 0.23
Internode length* (cm) 3.17 ± 0.46 2.78 ± 0.20 2.08 ± 0.33 0.99 ± 0.04 1.05 ± 0.17 1.10 ± 0.00
Nitrates (mg/L) 0.93 ± 0.23 0.97 ± 0.12 1.00 ± 0.17 0.93 ± 0.23 0.97 ± 0.12 1.10 ± 0.00
Nitrites (mg/L) 0.06 ± 0.00 0.02 ± 0.00 0.05 ± 0.00 0.06 ± 0.00 0.02 ± 0.00 0.06 ± 0.02

Biochemical parameters include chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b), total chlorophyll (Total Chl), chlorophyll a/b ratio (Chl a/Chl b), carotenoids (Car), Malondialdehyde (MDA), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Morphological traits include the number of shoots and internode length. Soil parameters include nitrate and nitrite concentrations. Asterisks indicate significant effects from the linear mixed effects model:

*

p < 0.001for the interaction Treatment × Species. Bolded parameters are values analyzed and shown in Supplementary Table 2.

Average nitrate concentrations in native mixed sediment were 0.93 ± 0.23 SE mg/L, while nitrite levels averaged at 0.06 ± 0.04 SE mg/L (Table 1). Similar values were observed in reduced mixed densities, with nitrates at 0.97± 0.12 SE mg/L and nitrites at 0.02 ± 0.03 SE mg/L. Native alone treatments had an average nitrate of 1.00 ± 0.17 SE mg/L and nitrite concentration of 0.053 ± 0.004 SE mg/L respectively, while the invasive showed 1.10 ± 0 SE mg/L for nitrates and 0.06 ± 0.02 SE mg/L for nitrites. Overall, nitrate and nitrite concentrations did not significantly differ between treatments and species.

Morphological values for the number of aboveground and belowground shoots, presented in Table 1 are published in Chiquillo et al. (2022), and no additional statistical analyses were conducted on these data. Briefly, competition experiments in the Caribbean and Mediterranean showed that H. stipulacea performed better with native species than alone, while the native species was directly affected by H. stipulacea; where it lost shoots and biomass in the presence of the invasive. In the Mediterranean, H. stipulacea increased by 3.7 ± 1.3 shoots (+59.2%) when mixed but showed no change alone, whereas the native Cymodocea nodosa lost −1 ± 0.4 shoots (−29.2%) when mixed. Aboveground biomass patterns were similar: natives produced significantly more biomass when alone (0.55 ± 0.06 g) than mixed (0.18 ± 0.03 g; p < 0.01), while the invasive species maintained or increased biomass in mixed treatments. In the reduced-density mixed treatment, H.stipulacea grew by 4.3 ± 1.5 SE shoots, an increase from an initial of +150.0% ± 50.7 SE (initial shoot density 2.9 ± 0.1). Surprisingly, when density was reduced in the mixed community, the native increased in shoots by 0.2 ± 0.1 SE, which is a +15.0% ± 10.7 SE increase. When H.stipulacea grew in reduced mixed treatments, final aboveground biomass was 0.37 ± 0.08 g (estimated initial 0.24 ± 0.03 g), indicating considerable regrowth during the experiment. When the native seagrass grew in the reduced-density mixed treatment, its aboveground biomass of 0.22 ± 0.04 g was not different from when grown in the native full mixed treatment, despite the experimental reduction. However, internode length was not included in Chiquillo et al., 2022, and we found a species differences in the length of the rhizomal internodes between species; the average internode length of the native species was 3-fold longer than the invasive (Table 1; Supplementary Table S2).

3.2. Native and invasive seagrass phyllosphere

A total of 301,907 reads were sequenced from 41 sequencing libraries (40 biological samples and 1 negative extraction control). After quality control, joining of paired-end reads, and removal of chimeras, 169,068 high-quality reads remained, representing approximately ~56% of the original dataset. The extraction blank yielded 2,769 raw reads; however, no reads passed quality filtering, denoising, merging, or chimera removal, resulting in zero retained sequences after processing.

Rarefaction analysis was conducted on all 40 samples originally sequenced, demonstrating adequate sequencing depth with a maximum of 46,777 reads, indicating sufficient sampling effort to capture the bacterial diversity present (Supplementary Figure S1A). The remaining treatments—mixed at full density and mixed at reduced density—for each species exhibited intermediate ASV richness, while sequencing depth remained sufficient across all treatments with no consistent differences among treatment groups.

A total of 18 samples were retained for microbial analyses after completing morphometric, biochemical, and soil nutrient (nitrate/nitrite) assays. To standardize sampling effort for diversity analyses, we rarefied our n=18 samples to a sequencing depth of 1,500, resulting in the loss of one sample. Initial samples were excluded due to the absence of morphometric and biochemical metadata, and because only the natural-density treatment included sediment disturbance, which prevented a direct comparison across treatments. Samples were rarefied to a depth of 1,500 reads based on inspection of rarefaction curves (Supplementary Figure S1A), which indicated that most samples approached asymptotic richness at relatively low sequencing depths. This threshold was selected to balance sequencing depth with sample retention. This was an important consideration because the final timepoint samples were paired with morphometric, biochemical, and sediment nutrient (nitrate/nitrite) datasets; thus, maximizing overlap across datasets was necessary to maintain statistical power and enable integrative analyses. The exclusion of baseline samples from downstream analyses limits our ability to infer temporal changes across the experiment, and analyses therefore focused on treatment-driven differences at the final timepoint. Rarefaction curves for 17 samples, which were used exclusively for alpha and beta diversity analyses (Figure 1 Part II), reached saturation at a maximum sequencing depth of 32,142 reads, confirming that sequencing coverage was sufficient to represent the microbial diversity in the dataset (Supplementary Figure S1B). The native-alone and native-reduced treatments exhibited the steepest initial slopes and highest plateau values, consistent with their elevated ASV richness. In contrast, samples from the invasive-mixed and invasive reduced mixed treatments plateaued at lower read depths, corresponding to lower bacterial diversity in those communities.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Flowchart of the sampling design and microbial sequencing workflow. Part I – Overall sampling (n = 40). Four mesocosm treatments were established following data from Chiquillo et al. (2022) (A) Mixed (native and invasive seagrass species co-occurring at natural densities), (B) Reduced mixed (native and invasive species co-occurring at reduced densities to assess density-dependent effects), (C) Native alone (monoculture of Cymodocea nodosa), and (D) Invasive alone (monoculture of Halophila stipulacea). Mesocosm symbol required attribution from: [images/graphics from] Integration and Application Network (ian.umces.edu/media-library). DNA extractions were conducted on four composite samples per treatment × species at the initial timepoint (n = 16) and final (n = 24) time points for 40 biological samples and 1 negative. The full mixed treatment lacked initial samples (see Supplementary Table 1). Raw sequence reads underwent quality filtering, denoising, chimera removal, and ASV inference using the SILVA database. Sequencing depth adequacy and sample coverage were evaluated using rarefaction curves, maintaining only bacterial taxa. Part II – Sampling Competitive Outcomes (n = 18). Downstream analyses assessed alpha diversity, beta diversity, and differential abundance for taxa under competitive interactions.

All alpha and beta diversity calculations were done with rarefied data and using a max of 17 individuals per sample. All remaining analyses, including relative abundance, core microbiome identification, and MaAsLin2 modeling, were performed on the final dataset (n=18), comprising of 826 ASVs, and the average number of ASVs per sample was 220.

3.3. Alpha and beta diversity identified of the phyllosphere

The rarefaction allowed us to detect 826 bacterial ASVs identified across all taxonomic levels. A mentioned in methods, it led to exclusion of one sample, and rarefaction curves demonstrated that sequencing coverage was sufficient to capture the majority of bacterial diversity across samples (Supplementary Figure S1). Native and invasive seagrasses portrayed analogous Shannon alpha bacterial diversity measurements (Figure 2A), with no significant relationships between treatment and species (p = 0.171; Supplementary Table S3). Pielou evenness also showed no significant relationships between groups (p = 0.763; Supplementary Table S4).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Alpha bacterial diversity of the seagrass samples split by treatment and species. Points are color-coded according to treatment (in fully natural mixed (pink), reduced mixed (blue) and alone (green). Stippled box plots represent the native Cymodocea nodosa, while solid box plots represent the invasive Halophila stipulacea. (A) Shannon (p= 0.171) and Pielou alpha diversity (p = 0.763) measures were analyzed on the species level. (B) Beta bacterial diversity of native versus invasive seagrasses grown in fully natural mixed (pink), reduced mixed (blue) and alone (green) in a non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot with Bray-Curtis distances analyzed on the species level. Circles represent the native Cymodocea nodosa, while triangles represent the invasive Halophila stipulacea.

Beta diversity analysis using based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities showed significant overall differences in microbial community composition among groups (PERMANOVA: F5,11 = 3.857, R2 = 0.637, p = 0.001), with group identity explaining 63.7% of the variation. ANOSIM supported this overall separation (R = 0.713, p = 0.001). Native and invasive seagrass samples clustered separately in non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination space (Figure 2B). Pairwise PERMANOVA comparisons were not significant after multiple testing correction (Supplementary Table S5). Tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersion indicated no significant differences among groups (betadisper permutation test, p = 0.505, PERMDISP, p = 0.528), indicating that differences in dispersion did not account for the observed overall PERMANOVA result.

Results from the SRS-normalized dataset were consistent with the rarefied analyses. Alpha diversity patterns were consistent with the rarefied dataset, with marginally non-significant differences among groups (Kruskal–Wallis p = 0.0666). Beta diversity analyses also supported consistent results, with significant overall differences (PERMANOVA p = 0.001; ANOSIM R = 0.737, p = 0.001), non-significant pairwise PERMANOVA comparisons, and non-significant dispersion effects (betadisper permutation test, p = 0.607) (Supplementary Figure S2; Supplementary Table S6).

The top phyla associated with the phyllosphere of native and invasive seagrass showed Proteobacteria (Figure 3A), which accounted for 72.1% of the analyzed sequence reads across all samples. The second and third most abundant phyla across all samples were Bacteroidota (7.7%) and Planctomycetota (3.7%). Additional common phyla found among all groups were Actinobacteriota (2.7%), Verrucomicrobiota (2.5%), Desulfobacterota (2.4%), and Myxococcota (1.6%).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Bacterial relative abundance plots of the seagrass samples split by species and treatment. (A) Relative abundances of the top 25 most common phyla in native and invasive seagrass samples. (B) Relative abundances of the top 25 most abundant bacterial taxa observed in native and invasive seagrass samples. Taxa are reported at the highest taxonomic level that could be confidently assigned (e.g., genus, family, or class).

The top 25 most abundant taxa marked strong differences in bacterial proportions between the two species of seagrass (Figure 3B). The top genus detected was Rhodobacteraceae, which accounted for 26.1% of the analyzed sequence reads across all samples. Surprisingly, the native seagrass C. nodosa showed relatively elevated levels of Bacteroidota (10.5-11.8%) compared with the invasive seagrass (2.3-5%). We also found higher proportions of uncultured genera of the family Oceanicella (5-14.2%), Microtrichaceae (3.1-5.8%), and other genera such as Hyphomonas (3-4.3%), Methylotenera (2.5-4.9%), and Lentimonas (2.1-3.9%) in the native seagrass compared to the invasive seagrass, where it was absent or low in recognizable reads. Compared to the native seagrass, which were absent or low in recognizable reads, there was an increased abundance of the genus Cobetia in the invasive H. stipulacea (2.1-4.6%).

3.4. Bacteria significantly associated with Cymodocea nodosa grown in mixed densities versus alone

Of the top 25 taxa, a family within the Rhodobacteraceae in the native seagrass C. nodosa possessed a higher relative abundance of the genus Oceanicella when grown in mixed density (10.6%) and reduced mixed densities (14.2%) compared to when it grew alone (5%). Additionally, we found higher relative abundance of an uncultured taxon of the family Methyloligellaceae in mixed (10.6%) and reduced mixed (8.1%) treatments compared to when it grew alone (4.1%). When the native seagrass grew alone, the native seagrass had elevated levels of the genus Eionea (24.9%) versus when it grew with the invasive in mixed (0.6%) and reduced mixed habitats (0.1%). Lastly, when native C. nodosa grew alone, we identified elevated levels of the phyla Camplyobacterota (3.6%) when taxa abundance was very low or unrecognizable in all other treatments.

Results from MaAslin2 analysis showed that when the native C. nodosa grew alone there were three significantly positive associations with the genera Desulfobulbus (B = 1.107, q- value= 0.00214), Bermanella (B = 1.152, q- value= 0.002), and the PS1 clade of the order Parvibaculales (B = 3.916, q- value= 0.003) compared to when it grew mixed or in reduced mixed densities (Figure 4A). We found an increased association with the families Arcobacteraceae (B = 5.677, q-value = 0.048), Desulfococcaceae (B = 1.445, q-value = 0.083), the genera Sediminispirochaeta (B = 1.482, q-value = 0.048) and Aminicenantales (B = 4.232, q-value = 0.071). In contrast, the genus Vibrio was negatively associated with the native C. nodosa when it grew alone compared to when it grew in mixed and reduced density communities (B = −4.530, q-value = 0.019). Lastly, to assess robustness effects, we ran a simplified model where parameterization included only the primary predictors, and our analyses confirmed the main patterns observed.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Microbiome multivariable associations with linear models (MaAsLin 2) heatmaps based on 27 covariates. A red color (+) indicates positive correlation, while a blue color (−) indicates negative correlation. FDR q-value cutoff value was 0.05. Statistical significance is based on FDR-adjusted q-values (q ≤ 0.05). Effect sizes (coefficients) are shown for taxa significantly associated with metadata variables. (A) Heatmap of taxa correlated with significant changes in native groups only compared to the native mixed group with a low number of shoots. (B) Heatmap of taxa correlated with significant changes in invasive groups only compared to the invasive mixed group with a high number of shoots.

3.5. Bacteria significantly associated with the invasive Halophila stipulacea grown mixed versus alone

The top 25 taxa within the invasive H. stipulacea samples were generally dominated by the family Pseduoaltermonadaceae and Vibrionaceae. Within the family Pseduoaltermonadaceae, the genus Pseudoalteromonas was notably pronounced across the invasive seagrass treatments. However, when H. stipulacea grew in mixed densities, results showed a higher relative abundance of the genus Pseudoalteromonas (32.7%) compared to when it grew in a reduced mixed community (14%) and when it grew alone (6.5%). Specifically, H. stipulacea showed a pronounced presence of the genus Vibrio and Photobacterium in mixed density (16.7% and 9.1%, respectively) and reduced mixed density treatments (30% and 4.7%, respectively) versus when it grew alone (18.6 and 0.1%, respectively). Additionally, we found H. stipulacea tended to have a higher relative abundance of unassigned genera of the family Cellvibrionaceae in reduced mixed densities (7%) compared to when it grew in mixed densities (1.1%) and when it grew alone (3.6%).

Results from MaAsLin2 analyses showed that when invasive H. stipulacea seagrass grew alone and in reduced densities, there was a negative association the genera Zeaxanthinibacter (B = −1.175, q-value= 0.015) and Tenacibaculum (B = −1.348, q-value= 0.027) compared to when it grows in mixed densities (Figure 4B). Interestingly, the genus Photobacterium (B = −6.877, q-value= 0.036) was negatively associated with the invasive H. stipulacea when it grew alone compared to when it grew in mixed and reduced density communities. The family Rhodobacteraceae was positively associated with the invasive seagrass when it grew in monoculture compared to when it grew in mixed environments (B = 2.478, q-value = 0.139). When the invasive H. stipulacea was grown in reduced density there was a negative association with the genus Rhodospirillaceae (B = −1.699, q-value= 0.152) and a positive association with the genus Perspicuibacter (B = 3.008, q-value = 0.176) compared to when it grew mixed or in monoculture. To assess potential overparameterization, we conducted a robustness check using reduced predictor sets (native: discrete and continuous internode length and H2O2; invasive: discrete and continuous shoot number), and these reduced models produced results consistent with the full analysis, supporting the robustness of the observed associations (Supplementary Figure 3).

3.6. Environmental covariates associated with native and invasive bacterial diversity

The relationship between beta diversity and environmental covariates revealed a clear clustering between native and invasive seagrass samples forming distinct groups (Figure 5). Invasive seagrass displayed a broader ordination space, consistent with higher heterogeneity, suggesting more variable microbial assemblages relative to the native samples. Among the environmental covariates, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)—a proxy for cellular stress—was significantly associated with microbial community structure of native C. nodosa (p = 0.003, R2 = 0.610; Table 2). Additionally, covariate internode length, indicative of space-foraging or habitat-seeking behavior, was also significantly correlated with bacterial composition of native C. nodosa (p = 0.008, R2 = 0.492). However, the number of shoots, often linked to overall growth and productivity, showed a weaker association with the invasive H. stipulacea (p = 0.060, R2 = 0.329).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot with Bray-Curtis distances on the species level. Native C. nodosa samples are mapped as circles, while invasive H. stipulacea samples are mapped as triangles. Points are color-coded according to treatment. Arrows signify the strength and direction of correlations between environmental covariates and the ordination plot. Only the top three statistically significant environmental covariates are displayed.

Table 2.

Environmental covariate statistics from PCoA.

Parameter Dim1 Dim2 R2 Pr(>r)
Chl a −0.512 −0.859 0.124 0.343
Chl b 0.206 −0.979 0.091 0.493
Total Chl −0.202 −0.979 0.202 0.189
Chl a / Chl b −0.999 −0.036 0.067 0.587
Car −0.293 −0.956 0.024 0.807
MDA −0.314 −0.950 0.157 0.289
H2O2 −0.505 −0.863 0.610 0.003
Nitrite −0.307 0.952 0.054 0.647
Nitrate 0.414 −0.910 0.029 0.767
Number of shoots 0.225 0.974 0.329 0.060
Aboveground biomass −0.385 0.923 0.110 0.450
Belowground biomass −0.981 −0.192 0.062 0.639
Internode length −0.533 −0.846 0.492 0.008

Significant values are bolded. Chlorophyll a, Chlorophyll b, Carotenoids, MDA, and H2O2. Numerator (numDF) and denominator (denDF).

3.7. Core microbiome of native and invasive seagrass

We identified a total of 53 genera occurring in at least 80% of the samples that were shared among both native and invasive seagrass, representing their core microbiome (Figure 6A; Supplementary Table S7). Two genera were present in all groups, except when the invasive was growing alone, and were identified as an uncultured genus of the class Alphaproteobacteria and the genus Aquibacter. The native Cymodocea nodosa exhibited a core microbiome comprising 87 genera (Figure 6B; Supplementary Table S8), with no taxa unique to only one or two groups. In contrast, the invasive H. stipulacea harbored a smaller core of 24 genera (Figure 6C; Supplementary Table S9), and similarly, no taxa were exclusive to only one or two groups.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Venn diagrams of unique and concordant genera observed in the core microbiome of the seagrass samples. Empty cells indicate zero values. (A) Unique and concordant genera observed in 80% of the combined native and invasive seagrass samples. (B) Unique and concordant genera observed in 80% of the native C. nodosa samples only. (C) Unique and concordant genera observed in 80% of the invasive H. stipulacea samples only.

Interestingly, we detected more differentially abundant bacterial genera of the core microbiome between native and invasive seagrass species when growing in mixed communities or alone (Figure 7A). Bacterial communities appeared more similar when the native seagrass grew in reduced mixed treatments and when it grew alone, than when grown with the invasive. This trend is the opposite for the invasive H. stipulacea, where bacterial communities looked similar to each other when grown in natural and in reduced mixed treatments, compared to when grown alone.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Heatmaps of genera observed in the core microbiome of native and invasive seagrass samples using Bray-Curtis distances and the Ward clustering algorithm on the genus level. A red color indicates a higher frequency of taxa (similarity), while a blue color indicates a lower frequency of taxa (dissimilarity). Hues indicate intensity. (A) Genera observed in 80% of the native C. nodosa samples only. (B) Genera observed in 80% of the invasive H. stipulacea samples only.

In the core microbiome of the native seagrass Cymodocea nodosa, microbial community composition resembled more closely when the native seagrass growing with the invasive H. stipulacea in reduced mixed densities and when it grew alone, compared to taxa when it grew in natural conditions with the invasive H. stipulacea (Figure 7A). Over 35 taxa– such as Bdellovibrio, members of Saprospiraceae, Cyclobacteriaceae, and Flavobacteriaceae– were more abundant when the native C. nodosa grew alone compared to when it was grown in mixed assemblages with the invasive species at full or reduced densities.

In contrast, only a limited set of taxa—including Pseudorhodobacter and members of Rhodobacteraceae—showed higher abundance when growing at native fully mixed densities with the invasive seagrass, consistent with the possibility that interspecific interactions influence the composition of specific microbial associates. In the core microbiome of the invasive seagrass, many taxa that were highly abundant in mixed environments were absent when the invasive seagrass grew alone (Figure 7B). For example, Bdellovibrio and other members of the class Alphaproteobacteria showed increased activity in mixed conditions but were negatively associated when the invasive seagrass grew alone. Conversely, when the invasive species grew alone, we observed a positive association with Rhodobacteraceae and the genus Eionea, which were lower in abundance when the invasive seagrass grew in mixed and reduced mixed densities with the native seagrass.

4. Discussion

This is the first study to show that microbial community composition differs between mixed C. nodosa and H. stipulacea assemblages and monocultures in the Mediterranean, consistent with interactions between native and invasive seagrasses. Our results suggest that the microbial community composition of H. stipulacea varies with the outcome of species interactions in mixed communities. Consistent with the increased shoot production of H. stipulacea and reduced shoot production of C. nodosa when grown in mixed assemblages, H. stipulacea exhibited increased ASV richness in the presence of the native seagrass. In contrast, the native seagrass had a more diverse core microbiome and increased oxidative stress when grown alone, as well as lower ASV richness in the presence of the invasive seagrass. Importantly, combining these data with biochemical and morphological data from Chiquillo et al. (2022) suggests that phyllosphere microbial patterns are associated with the growth of invasive H. stipulacea, and we hypothesize that it may relate to traits linked to invasion success; future work is needed to determine the functional roles of these microbial taxa.

Our results reveal an asymmetric pattern: H. stipulacea exhibited greater ASV richness in the presence of C. nodosa, while C. nodosa’s microbial diversity decreased in the presence of H. stipulacea. Although much of the observed variation was primarily driven by species identity rather than specific treatment contrasts, these patterns suggest that competitive interactions may be associated with shifts in the composition of seagrass-associated microbial communities, with potential implications for invasion dynamics. While we note that quality control and rarefaction reduced sequencing depth across samples, resulting in relatively low read counts for some analyses, rarefaction curves indicated sufficient coverage for diversity estimation, and treatment-level comparisons were therefore interpreted within this constrained sequencing depth. Given that H. stipulacea thrives in both disturbed and open habitats and successfully invades intact native communities, our results are consistent with a negative association between H. stipulacea co-occurrence and C. nodosa density and bacterial diversity, which may be relevant to understanding the microbial dynamics associated with the invasion ecology of H. stipulacea.

4.1. Native species, though diverse, may fail to resist invasion, at their own cost

We found that the native C. nodosa exhibited the highest microbial diversity in monoculture, along with a more diverse core microbiome. When grown with H. stipulacea, C. nodosa’s diversity declined, and plant density was reduced (Sghaier et al. 2014; Mannino et al. 2023). Similar to Conte et al. (2023), we observed that C. nodosa’s highest diversity occurred when it grew alone, whereas in mixed assemblages, it exhibited reduced density, lower diversity, and higher phenol content, which is a biochemical indicator of stress (Mejia et al., 2016).

Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that C. nodosa’s bacterial diversity is correlated with cellular stress. In mixed environments, C. nodosa also exhibited increased internode length, although functional significance of the morphological response remains unclear. One possible explanation is that microbial communities may vary with plant competition, with potential consequences affecting physiology, performance, and fitness of native species. Conte et al. (2023) also observed that C. nodosa boasted the highest bacterial diversity in monoculture, while C. nodosa reduced its density, depicted lower bacterial diversity, and had higher phenol content in syntopy with H. stipulacea. High phenol content is linked with stress in seagrasses and is equipped as a defense mechanism against threats such as predation, low light regimes, pollution, ocean acidification, and competition by marine macrophytes (Mejia et al., 2016). Conte et al. (2023), alongside Chiquillo et al. (2022), observed that C. nodosa exhibited the greatest increase in shoot number when grown alone, suggest that C. nodosa’s may exhibit different microbial associations when it cooccurs with H. stipulacea. These shifts seem to mirror patterns seen in other systems with theoretical and empircal work show soil microbes can shape plant competitive outcomes (Ke and Wan 2020). More broadly, plant associated microbiomes are known to shift under environmental and physiological stress (Perreault and Laforest-Lapointe, 2022; Zandi and Schnug, 2022), consistent with the elevated hydrogen peroxide we observed in native species.

While the majority of studies focus on how microbes mediate competitive outcomes between plants, our approach examined how interspecific competition itself hosts differential microbial communities. Next steps would be to test for direct microbial transfer between species. Contrary to expectations, the native seagrass exhibited significantly higher H2O2 concentrations, consistent with greater oxidative stress levels compared to H. stipulacea. The capacity to scavenge reactive oxygen species such as H2O2 is a key determinant of a plant’s tolerance to environmental stress. Higher H2O2 has been observed in competitive superiors where elevated H2O2 concentrations were seen in monocultures compared to mixed assemblages (Ouyang et al., 2023; Navas et al., 1999); for example a noxious marine endophyte, P. Crispus, which is classified as a competitive superior, had higher H2O2 concentrations in monoculture than mixed (Chalanika De Silva and Asaeda, 2017). However, our results suggest that despite being competitively inferior to H. stipulacea, C. nodosa’s disproportionately high H2O2 levels may indicate that oxidative stress in this case reflects a competitive disadvantage rather than superiority.

4.2. Associations between H. stipulacea and distinct microbial taxa

Competitive interactions between H. stipulacea and three other native seagrasses, H. decipiens, S. filiforme, and T. testudinum, have shown displacement of natives from the Caribbean (Steiner & Willette 2010; Muthukrishnan et al., 2020; Willette and Ambrose, 2012), and its recent expansion of H. stipulacea into South Florida has been reported (Campbell et al., 2025). Not surprisingly, even when alone, H. stipulacea maintained a distinct microbial community, indicating that its microbial associations are not restircted to mixed assemblages and may support its own invasion success, possibly by influencing its microbial community or exploiting its environment to its advantage.

In a field experiment examining seagrass interactions in the Mediterranean, Conte et al. (2023) found evidence that H. stipulacea’s microbial communities are also plastic when growing with the native C. nodosa, displaying a high bacterial variability, supporting the host generalist hypothesis. In addition to negatively impacting the microbial community of the native seagrass, our results indicate that H. stipulacea was associated with bacterial taxa previously reported to potentially possess beneficial functions in mixed environments (Supplementary Table S10), without the need for a disturbance to remove native seagrass species. We know that H. stipulacea is a strong invader even in monoculture, where the species can colonize open habitat (Willette et al., 2014; Winters et al., 2020; Smulders et al., 2017). Like Conte et al. (2023), we found that H. stipulacea harbored a less diverse microbiome than C. nodosa in the Mediterranean Sea and that between the two species, C. nodosa hosted the richest and most abundant microbiome in monoculture, while H. stipulacea bacterial diversity was highest in mixed environments.

A limited set of taxa- including Rhodobacteraceae sp. might explain the ability of H. stipulacea when grown in a mixed environment, as they have been previously associated with assisting with carbon and sulfur cycling as well as photosynthesis in marine anaerobic environments (Pujalte et al., 2014; Crump et al., 2018), producing antibacterial compounds (Hurtado-McCormick et al., 2019), and are potentially involved in biofilm formation (Vogel et al., 2020; Conte et al., 2023). They have been frequently identified in seagrasses, including H. stipulacea (Mejia et al., 2016; Rotini et al., 2017; Stuij, 2018; Hurtado-McCormick et al., 2019; Garcias-Bonet et al., 2021; Ling et al., 2021; Conte et al., 2023) and have been associated with H. stipulacea leaves in high light and hydrodynamic regimes (Mejia et al., 2016).

Results from the competition experiment in the Mediterranean Sea add to the existing knowledge of H. stipulacea microbial diversity. We observed lower microbial community diversity compared to previous observations in both mixed and monoculture environments across the Red Sea (Wahbeh and Mahasneh, 1984; Pereg et al., 1994; Weidner et al., 1996, 2000; Mejia et al., 2016; Rotini et al., 2017; Garcias-Bonet et al., 2021; Abdel-Wahab et al., 2021), Mediterranean (Conte et al., 2021, 2023), and Caribbean Seas (Stuij, 2018; Aires et al., 2021). This contrast may be due to the experimental context of our study, as samples were collected six weeks after transplantation, rather than directly from natural donor sites. Although we did not detect the same taxa, our findings align with Conte et al. (2023), who identified beneficial H. stipulacea bacteria in the Mediterranean Sea such as the nitrogen-fixing Microcystaceae, Nisaeaceae, Phormidiaceae; sulfur-fixing Desulfocapsacaceae; and leaf colonizing Pirellulaceae. Our results overlap with taxa reported by Aires et al. (2021), who found several halotolerant genera in H. stipulacea with elevated abundance in plant growth-promoting Halomonas, quorum-inhibiting Salinimonas and Salinicola, heavy metal-tolerant Lysinibacillus, and halotolerant genera such as Rhodococcus and Azospirillum, which support seed germination under high salinity.

Due to constraints, our study examined only phyllosphere bacteria associated with the native and invasive seagrass, although it is widely accepted that the rhizosphere exhibits a richer microbial community (Rotini et al., 2017; Li et al., 2025). Our focus on phyllosphere-associated microbes was justified because the available microbial samples and observed treatment responses were derived primarily from above-ground tissues and shoot dynamics. However, below-ground microbial communities remain an important limitation of this study and a critical direction for future research. It is likely that rhizosphere bacteria also play important roles in H. stipulacea invasion success, particularly since seagrass above- and belowground compartments possess distinct microbes (Stuij, 2018; Winters et al., 2020; Aires et al., 2021) and sediment microbes can contribute to nutrient acquisition and other critical plant processes. Given their recognized role in nutrient cycling and acquisition in seagrasses (Zhang et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2024), future studies integrating rhizosphere microbiome analyses with sediment chemistry would provide important mechanistic insight into the observed nitrate dynamics. Especially, since experimental evidence has linked that both root- and sediment-associated microbiota to seagrass performance under nutrient variability and stress, particularly through root-linked microbial functions that buffer environmental change (Fuggle et al., 2023; Jongen et al., 2026). Broader syntheses further emphasize that these below-ground microbial processes are foundational to seagrass health and should be explicitly integrated into restoration and predictive frameworks (Jongen et al., 2024). Similarly, experimental work on the invasive macroalga Caulerpa taxifolia has shown that sediment microbial communities can influence invasion outcomes by either promoting invader growth or providing biotic resistance from native seagrass sediments, highlighting the broader importance of below-ground microbial processes in marine plant invasions (Gribben et al., 2018).

4.3. Alternative hypotheses: microbes as potential drivers or passengers of competitive interactions

One possible explanation for reduced microbial diversity in C. nodosa when grown with H. stipulacea is allelopathy. An untested possiblility is that H. stipulacea harbors microbial associates that produce compounds negatively affecting the native species, a mechanism by which microbes are known to mediate plant allelopathy (Cipollini et al., 2012; Greer et al., 2014). For example, we found a strong positive association between H. stipulacea in intraspecific competition and the genus Perspicuibacter, which has been previously associated with sulfur cycling, in contrast to mixed assemblages. This pattern differs from studies reporting strong negative effects of interspecific competition among seagrasses. We also observed a positive association between H. stipulacea grown alone and members of Rhodobacteraceae. While allelopathy is well documented in terrestrial plants (Bais et al., 2003; Orr et al., 2005; Chengxu et al., 2011; Greer et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2017; Kalisz et al., 2021) and in some seagrass–macroalgae interactions (Dumay et al., 2004; Pergent et al., 2008; Raniello et al., 2007), to our knowledge, seagrass–seagrass allelopathy has not been reported. Vibrio, significantly more associated with C. nodosa in mixed assemblages, is notable for its algicidal (Sakata et al., 2011; Setiabundi et al., 2026), antimicrobial (Millan, 2022; Wietz et al., 2010; Wietz et al., 2013; Romero-González et al., 2023; Alattas et al., 2024), and pathogenic properties (Sampaio et al., 2022; Alattas et al., 2024), as well as its production of siderophores—iron-chelating compounds with potential allelopathic effects (Wietz et al., 2013; Alattas et al., 2024; Dar et al., 2024). Results from Saunier et al. (2025) show that Halophila stipulacea has a distinct volatilome compared to native seagrasses, including compounds such as apocarotenoids and isothiocyanates. These compounds have been previously identified as allelopathic (Moreno et al., 2021), supporting a possible chemical mechanism underlying the patterns we observe, that could be investigated in future studies. In addition, we found Pseudomonas in the core taxa shared across H. stipulacea treatments (Supplementary Table S9). Members of this genus are known to produce bioactive compounds, including antimicrobials and siderophores, which can alter microbial community structure and inhibit competitors. Together, these observations raise the possibility that both host chemistry and associated microbes mediate allelopathic interactions and potentially facilitate invasion success, similar to other terrestrial plant communities (Cavieres, 2021).

We hypothesize that another possible mechanism is that H. stipulacea may alter the phyllosphere community of C. nodosa in mixed assemblages. Desulfobulbus, the most significantly associated genus with C. nodosa grown alone (B = 1.107, q = 0.00214), is a sulfate-reducer common in seagrass holobionts and sediments (Küsel et al., 1999; Ling et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2021). It has been linked to nutrient cycling, hydrocarbon degradation, and nitrogen fixation (Zhou et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2025). Other taxa significantly associated with C. nodosa alone include Bermanella, known for hydrocarbon degradation (Hu et al., 2017; Ribicic et al., 2018; Peeb et al., 2022; Howe et al., 2024), and the PS1 clade, related to nitrogen-fixing Rhizobiales adapted to low-nutrient conditions (Jimenez-Infante et al., 2014; Stuij, 2018; Zhai et al., 2022). Changes in the abundance of such taxa may be associated with microbial functions in mixed assemblages and could alter microbial functions associated with native seagrass performance when grown alone.

For H. stipulacea, several taxa were less abundant when grown alone than in mixed assemblages, suggesting a capacity to retain microbial taxa previously associated with beneficial functions (Cardini et al. 2018). These included Zeaxanthinibacter (photoprotective pigment production; Demmig-Adams et al., 2022; Demmig-Adams et al., 2020), Tenacibaculum (organic matter degradation), Photobacterium (nitrogen fixation, nutrient provisioning), Rhodospirillales (anaerobic photosynthesis), and Micavibrionales (potential oil-degrader interactions). While 16S rRNA sequencing does not confirm functional activity, these taxonomic affiliations provide a hypothesis that these traits could enhance H. stipulacea growth and resilience. We also did not account for archaea, protists, viruses, or fungal communities, which are known to mediate nutrient acquisition, host–microbe interactions, and organismal expansion (Van der Putten et al., 2007). As climate change is expected to promote the expansion of H. stipulacea in the Mediterranean (Winters et al., 2020; Beca-Carretero et al., 2024; Nguyen et al., 2020), understanding whether these microbial shifts are a cause or a consequence of competitive success remains a critical next step.

4.4. Concluding statement

This study illuminates that phyllosphere microbial communities associated with Halophila stipulacea vary with growth conditions and co-occurrence with the native seagrass, Cymodocea nodosa, in the Mediterranean Sea. Specifically, we show how microbial communities alter in relation to competition. When competition coincides with enhanced invasive performance, microbial communities also differ (Brooker, 2006). Ultimately, our results identify microbial community patterns associated with H. stipulacea phyllosphere and its enhanced performance in mixed Mediterranean environments; however, further research is necessary into the mechanisms behind this association. Specifically, future investigations should focus on whether H. stipulacea selectively associates with microbial taxa previously reported to possess beneficial functions, whether putative microbe-mediated allelopathic interactions occur, or whether its microbiome is passively shaped by community assembly processes. We acknowledge that the compositing may reduce estimates of within treatment variance, and should therefore be interpreted as a conservative estimate of microbial community variability. Overall, we present valuable new insights into plant-microbe interactions in marine ecosystems and the possible benefits of seagrass-microbe interactions in H. stipulacea invasions.

Supplementary Material

Table 1

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 1

Number of samples across treatments for biochemical, morphological, sediment, and microbial analyses in native, Cymodocea nodosa, and invasive, Halophila stipulacea. Values represent the number of composite samples (n). Treatments include Naturally Mixed, Reduced Mixed, Native Alone, and Invasive Alone. Photosynthetic pigments include chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids and oxidative stress markers include H2O2 and MDA. Morphological traits include growth, biomass, and internode length measured per treatment. Sediment nutrients include nitrate and nitrite concentrations. Microbial datasets include composite samples collected at the initial time point and final time point, with a subset retained for downstream analyses. PCR negative controls were included to account for contamination and sequencing artifacts.

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 2

Linear mixed effects model of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, MDA and H2O2. Numerator (numDF) and denominator (denDF), F-value and p-value are summarized.

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 3

Kruskal-Wallis statistics for Shannon alpha diversity. Significant values are bolded.

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 4

Kruskal-Wallis statistics for Pielou evenness (alpha diversity).

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 5

PERMANOVA, pairwise PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and betadisper statistics for beta diversity. Significant values are bolded.

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 6

PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and betadisper statistics for Scaling with Ranked Subsampling (SRS) beta diversity for all 18 samples. Significant values are bolded. Pairwise PERMANOVA: Not Significant.

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 7

Table of core taxa shared among all six groups and all groups except invasive alone (see Figure 6A).

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 8

Table of core taxa shared among C. nodosa groups (see Figure 6B).

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 9

Table of core taxa shared among H. stipulacea treatments (see Figure 6C).

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 10

Core microbiome taxa identified in mixed and reduced mixed treatments in the H. stipulacea heatmap and their putative function.

Suppl materials

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 1

(A) Rarefaction curve of total bacterial diversity for n=40 initial and final samples. (B) Rarefaction curve of total bacterial diversity for n=18 final samples.

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 2

Alpha bacterial diversity of the seagrass samples split by treatment and species, using Scaling with Ranked Subsampling (SRS). (A) Native, Cymodocea nodosa, fully natural mixed (red) box plot, dark blue represents native and invasive grown in reduced mixed treatments and blue represents the native when it grows alone, while the yellow box plot represents the invasive Halophila stipulacea, grown in fully natural mixed and pink is when the invasive grows alone. SRS measures were analyzed on the species level with marginal significance (p = 0.06657). (B) Beta bacterial diversity of native versus invasive seagrasses grown in fully natural mixed (pink), reduced mixed (blue), and alone (green) in a non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot with Bray-Curtis distances analyzed on the species level. Circles represent the native Cymodocea nodosa, while triangles represent the invasive Halophila stipulacea. Points are color-coded according by species and treatment.

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 3

Microbiome multivariable associations with linear models (MaAsLin 2) heatmaps based on the primary predictors of interest for each species. A red color (+) indicates positive correlation, while a blue color (−) indicates negative correlation. FDR q-value cutoff value was 0.05. Statistical significance is based on FDR-adjusted q-values (q ≤ 0.05). Effect sizes (coefficients) are shown for taxa significantly associated with metadata variables. (A) Heatmap of taxa correlated with significant changes in native groups only compared to the native mixed group with a low number of shoots. (B) Heatmap of taxa correlated with significant changes in invasive groups only compared to the invasive mixed group with a high number of shoots.

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2026.1871379/full#supplementary-material

Acknowledgments

O.E. Vasquez for field work and support during the mesocosms studies in Cyprus. We thank Stylianos Kanakaris for his support in field and lab work. G. Anastasiades provided space at Marine Research, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development, and Environment in Meneou, Cyprus. We would like to acknowledge Juan S. Ramirez and Jose E. Garcia Arraras for their immense support in funding and providing feedback.

Funding

The author(s) declared financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. KLC was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (Grant ID DGE-1650604) and the National Science Foundation Bridge to the Doctorate program (Grant ID HRD-1400789). Additionally, KLC was funded by UPR Rio Piedras Start Up Funds and the Catalyzer Grant from the Puerto Rico Science Trust. KLC and EHF were funded by NSF RaMP-UP: Research and Mentoring for Postbaccalaureates in Biological Sciences at the University of Puerto Rico, NSF DBI: 2216584. FGV was also partially supported by the Institutional National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIGMS-NIH) (Grant numbers PR-INBRE P20 GM103475).

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author FG-V declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Data availability statement

The 16S rRNA raw sequence data have been deposited in the SRA of NCBI with BioProject Number PRJNA1291277 and assigned accession numbers SRR34539037-SRR34539076.

References

  1. Abdel-Wahab MA, Bahkali AH, Elgorban AM, and Jones EBG. (2021). High-throughput amplicon sequencing of fungi and microbial eukaryotes associated with the seagrass Halophila stipulacea (Forssk.) Asch. from Al-Leith mangroves, Saudi Arabia. Mycol. Prog. 20, 1365–1381. doi: 10.1007/s11557-021-01744-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aires T, Kläui A, and Engelen A. (2023). Regional microbiome differentiation of the invasive Sargassum muticum (Fucales, Phaeophyceae) follows the generalist host hypothesis across the North East Atlantic. Eur. J. Phycol. 58, 268–283. doi: 10.1080/09670262.2022.2103738 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aires T, Serrão EA, Kendrick G, Duarte CM, and Arnaud-Haond S. (2013). Invasion is a community affair: Clandestine followers in the bacterial community associated to green algae, Caulerpa racemosa, track the invasion source. PloS One 8, e68429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aires T, Stuij TM, Muyzer G, Serrão EA, and Engelen AH. (2021). Characterization and comparison of bacterial communities of an invasive and two native caribbean seagrass species sheds light on the possible influence of the microbiome on invasive mechanisms. Front. Microbiol. 12. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.653998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson MJ, and Walsh DC. (2013). PERMANOVA, ANOSIM,and the Mantel test in the face of heterogeneous dispersions: what null hypothesis are you testing? Ecol. Monogr. 83, 557–574. doi: 10.1890/12-2010.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bais HP, Vepachedu R, Gilroy S, Callaway RM, and Vivanco JM. (2003). Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion: From molecules and genes to species interactions. Science 301, 1377–1380. doi: 10.1126/science.1083245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barnes EM, and Tringe SG. (2022). Exploring the roles of microbes in facilitating plant adaptation to climate change. Biochem. J. 479 (3), 327–335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barrow JR, Lucero ME, Reyes-Vera I, and Havstad KM. (2008). Do symbiotic microbes have a role in regulating plant performance and response to stress? Communicative Integr. Biol. 1, 69–73. doi: 10.4161/cib.1.1.6238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beca-Carretero P, Winters G, Teichberg M, Procaccini G, Schneekloth F, Zambrano RH, et al. (2024). Climate change and the presence of invasive species will threaten the persistence of the Mediterranean seagrass community. Sci. Total Environ. 910, 168675. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bisanz J. (2025). jbisanz/qiime2R. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. (2019). Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Brooker RW. (2006). Plant–plant interactions and environmental change. New Phytol. 171, 271–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01752.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brunet M, Le Duff N, Barbeyron T, and Thomas F. (2025). Year-round quantification, structure and dynamics of epibacterial communities from diverse macroalgae reveal a persistent core microbiota and strong host specificities. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 17, e70077. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.70077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, and Holmes SP. (2016). DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Campbell JE, Allen A-C, Sattelberger DC, White MD, and Fourqurean JW. (2025). First record of the seagrass Halophila stipulacea (Forsskal) Ascherson in the waters of the continental United States (Key Biscayne, Florida). Aquat. Bot. 196, 103820. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2024.103820 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, et al. (2011). Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 4516–4522. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000080107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cardini U, van Hoytema N, Bednarz VN, Al-Rshaidat MMD, and Wild C. (2018). N2 fixation and primary productivity in a red sea Halophila stipulacea meadow exposed to seasonality. Limnol. Oceanogr. 63, 786–798. doi: 10.1002/lno.10669 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cavieres LA. (2021). Facilitation and the invasibility of plant communities. J. Ecol. 109, 2019–2028. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13627 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chalanika De Silva HC, and Asaeda T. (2017). Effects of heat stress on growth, photosynthetic pigments, oxidative damage and competitive capacity of three submerged macrophytes. J. Plant Interact. 12, 228–236. doi: 10.1080/17429145.2017.1322153 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen B-M, Liao H-X, Chen W-B, Wei H-J, and Peng S-L. (2017). Role of allelopathy in plant invasion and control of invasive plants. Allelopathy J. 41, 155–166. doi: 10.26651/allelo.j/2017-41-2-1092 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chengxu W, Mingxing Z, Xuhui C, and Bo Q. (2011). Review on allelopathy of exotic invasive plants. Proc. Engineering Second SREE Conf. Chem. Eng. (CCE 2011) 18, 240–246. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.038 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chiquillo KL, Barber PH, Vasquez MI, Cruz-Rivera E, Willette DA, Winters G, et al. (2022). An invasive seagrass drives its own success in two invaded seas by both negatively affecting native seagrasses and benefiting from those costs. Oikos 2023, e09403. doi: 10.1111/oik.09403 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cipollini D, Rigsby CM, and Barto EK. (2012). Microbes as targets and mediators of allelopathy in plants. J. Chem. Ecol. 38, 714–727. doi: 10.1007/s10886-012-0133-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Conte C, Apostolaki ET, Vizzini S, and Migliore L. (2023). A tight interaction between the native seagrass Cymodocea nodosa and the exotic Halophila stipulacea in the Aegean Sea highlights seagrass holobiont variations. Plants 12, 350. doi: 10.3390/plants12020350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Conte C, Rotini A, Manfra L, D’Andrea MM, Winters G, and Migliore L. (2021). The seagrass holobiont: What we know and what we still need to disclose for its possible use as an ecological indicator. Water 13, 406. doi: 10.3390/w13040406 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Crump BC, Wojahn JM, Tomas F, and Mueller RS. (2018). Metatranscriptomics and amplicon sequencing reveal mutualisms in seagrass microbiomes. Front. Microbiol. 9, 388. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cú cio C, Engelen AH, Costa R, and Muyzer G. (2016). Rhizosphere microbiomes of European seagrasses are selected by the plant, but are not species specific. Front. Microbiol. 7, 440. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dawkins K, Mendonca J, Sutherland O, and Esiobu N. (2022). A systematic review of terrestrial plant invasion mechanisms mediated by microbes and restoration implications. Am. J. Plant Sci. 13, 205–222. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2022.132013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Dawson W, and Schrama M. (2016). Identifying the role of soil microbes in plant invasions. J. Ecol. 104, 1211–1218. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12619 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Demmig-Adams B, Polutchko SK, and Adams WW. (2022). Structure-function-environment relationship of the isomers zeaxanthin and lutein. Photochem. 2, 308–325. doi: 10.3390/photochem2020022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Demmig-Adams B, Stewart JJ, López-Pozo M, Polutchko SK, and Adams WW. (2020). Zeaxanthin, a molecule for photoprotection in many different environments. Molecules 25, 5825. doi: 10.3390/molecules25245825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Dumay O, Costa J, Desjobert J-M, and Pergent G. (2004). Variations in the concentration of phenolic compounds in the seagrass Posidonia oceanica under conditions of competition. Phytochemistry 65, 3211–3220. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Dusa A. (2022). venn: draw Venn diagrams. R package version 1.11 (Vienna: Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN)). Available online at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=venn. [Google Scholar]
  34. Egan S, Kumar V, Nappi J, and Gardiner M. (2017). “Microbial diversity and symbiotic interactions with macroalgae,” in Algal and Cyanobacteria Symbioses, Grube M, Seckbach J and Muggia L (WORLD SCIENTIFIC; (EUROPE: )), 493–546. doi: 10.1142/9781786340580_0016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Elsheikh EAE, El-Keblawy A, Mosa KA, Okoh AI, and Saadoun I. (2021). Role of endophytes and rhizosphere microbes in promoting the invasion of exotic plants in arid and semi-arid areas: A review. Sustainability 13, 13081. doi: 10.3390/su132313081 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Fang J, Xiong K, Chi Y, Song S, He C, and He S. (2022). Research advancement in grassland ecosystem vulnerability and ecological resilience and its inspiration for improving grassland ecosystem services in the Karst desertification control. Plants 11, 1290. doi: 10.3390/plants11101290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Fleming JP, and Dibble ED. (2015). Ecological mechanisms of invasion success in aquatic macrophytes. Hydrobiologia 746, 23–37. doi: 10.1007/s10750-014-2026-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Fuggle RE, Gribben PE, and Marzinelli EM. (2023). Experimental evidence root-associated microbes mediate seagrass response to environmental stress. J. Ecol. 111, 1079–1093. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.14081 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Funk JL, and Vitousek PM. (2007). Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems. Nature 446, 1079–1081. doi: 10.1038/nature05719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Garcias-Bonet N, Eguíluz VM, Díaz-Rúa R, and Duarte CM. (2021). Host-association as major driver of microbiome structure and composition in Red Sea seagrass ecosystems. Environ. Microbiol. 23, 2021–2034. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Goslee SC, and Urban DL. (2007). The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J. Stat. Software 22, 1–19. doi: 10.18637/jss.v022.i07 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Greer GK, Dietrich MA, and Lincoln JM. (2016). Ailanthus altissima stimulates legume nodulation in Trifolium pratense via root exudates: A novel mechanism facilitating invasion?. Int. J. Plant Sci. 177 (5), 400–408. [Google Scholar]
  43. Greer MJ, Wilson GWT, Hickman KR, and Wilson SM. (2014). Experimental evidence that invasive grasses use allelopathic biochemicals as a potential mechanism for invasion: chemical warfare in nature. Plant Soil 385, 165–179. doi: 10.1007/s11104-014-2209-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gribben PE, Thomas T, Pusceddu A, Bonechi L, Bianchelli S, Buschi E, et al. (2018). Below-ground processes control the success of an invasive seaweed. J. Ecol. 106, 2082–2095. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12966 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Harrison PG, and Bigley RE. (1982). The recent introduction of the seagrass zostera japonica aschers. and graebn. to the pacific coast of north America. Can. J. Fish. Aquat.Sci. 39, 1642–1648. doi: 10.1139/f82-221 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Heidrich V, Karlovsky P, and Beule L. (2021). ‘SRS’ R package and ‘q2-srs’ QIIME 2 plugin: Normalization of Microbiome Data Using Scaling with Ranked Subsampling (SRS). Appl. Sci. 11, 11473. doi: 10.3390/app112311473 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Hesse E, O’Brien S, Luján AM, Sanders D, Bayer F, van Veen EM, et al. (2021). Stress causes interspecific facilitation within a compost community. Ecol. Lett. 24, 2169–2177. doi: 10.1111/ele.13847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Howe KL, Zaugg J, and Mason OU. (2024). Novel, active, and uncultured hydrocarbon-degrading microbes in the ocean. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 90, e01224–24. doi: 10.1128/aem.01224-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Hu P, Dubinsky EA, Probst AJ, Wang J, Sieber CMK, Tom LM, et al. (2017). Simulation of Deepwater Horizon oil plume reveals substrate specialization within a complex community of hydrocarbon degraders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 7432–7437. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703424114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Inderjit, and van der Putten W. (2010). Impacts of soil microbial communities on exotic plant invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 512–519. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Jimenez-Infante F, Ngugi DK, Alam I, Rashid M, Baalawi W, Kamau AA, et al. (2014). Genomic differentiation among two strains of the PS1 clade isolated from geographically separated marine habitats. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 89, 181–197. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Jongen R, Gribben PE, Dafforn KA, Mayer-Pinto M, and Marzinelli EM (2026). Sediment and rhizosphere microbes mediate seagrass growth responses to below-ground nutrient limitation and enrichment. J. Ecol. 114, e70327. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.70327 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Jongen R, Marzinelli EM, Bugnot AB, Ferguson A, Fraser MW, Glasby TM, et al. (2024). “Integrating belowground interactions into seagrass restoration strategies,” in Oceanography and Marine Biology (London: CRC Press; ), 192–214. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kadivar H, and Stapleton AE. (2003). Ultraviolet radiation alters maize phyllosphere bacterial diversity. Microb. Ecol. 353–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Kalisz S, Kivlin SN, and Bialic-Murphy L (2021). Allelopathy is pervasive in invasive plants. Biol. Invasions 23, 367–371. doi: 10.1007/s10530-020-02383-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ke P-J, and Wan J (2020). Effects of soil microbes on plant competition: a perspective from modern coexistence theory. Ecol. Monogr. 90, e01391. doi: 10.1002/ecm.1391 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Kohli RK, Singh HP, and Batish DR (2024). Allelopathy in Agroecosystems (Boca Raton: CRC Press; ). doi: 10.1201/9781003578253 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Kolde R, and Vilo J (2015). GOsummaries: an R package for visual functional annotation of experimental data. F1000Research 4, 574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Küsel K, Pinkart HC, Drake HL, and Devereux R (1999). Acetogenic and sulfate-reducing bacteria inhabiting the rhizoplane and deep cortex cells of the sea grass halodule wrightii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 5117–5123. doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.11.5117-5123.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. LaForgia ML, Kang H, and Ettinger CL (2022). Invasive grass dominance over native forbs is linked to shifts in the bacterial rhizosphere microbiome. Microb. Ecol. 84, 496–508. doi: 10.1007/s00248-021-01853-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Li X, Wang H, Zang Y, Xue S, Xin J, Liu L, et al. (2025). Exploring the structure and assembly of seagrass microbial communities in rhizosphere and phyllosphere. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 91, e02437–24. doi: 10.1128/aem.02437-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Ling J, Zhou W, Yang Q, Yin J, Zhang J, Peng Q, et al. (2021). Spatial and species variations of bacterial community structure and putative function in seagrass rhizosphere sediment. Life 11, 852. doi: 10.3390/life11080852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Lipkin Y. (1975). Halophila stipulacea, a review of a successful immigration. Aquat. Bot. 1, 203–215. doi: 10.1016/0304-3770(75)90023-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Mallick H, Rahnavard A, McIver LJ, Ma S, Zhang Y, Nguyen LH, et al. (2021). Multivariable association discovery in population-scale meta-omics studies. PloS Comput. Biol. 17, e1009442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Mannino AM, Balistreri P, Mancuso FP, Bozzeda F, and Pinna M (2023). Details - Searching for the competitive ability of the alien seagrass Halophila stipulacea with the autochthonous species Cymodocea nodosa - Biodiversity Heritage Library [WWW Document. Available online at: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/355298 (Accessed May 21, 2025). n.d. [Google Scholar]
  66. Martinez Arbizu P. (2020). pairwiseAdonis: Pairwise multilevel comparison using adonis. (GitHub; ). [Google Scholar]
  67. Mejia AY, Rotini A, Lacasella F, Bookman R, Thaller MC, Shem-Tov R, et al. (2016). Assessing the ecological status of seagrasses using morphology, biochemical descriptors and microbial community analyses. A study in Halophila stipulacea (Forsk.) Aschers meadows in the northern Red Sea. Ecol. Indic. 60, 1150–1163. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Millan C. (2022). The effect of seagrass components on the associated bacterial diversity and antimicrobial activity in Zostera marina. Plymouth Student Scientist 15, 62–83. doi: 10.24382/z556-tn37 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Minotti G, and Aust SD. (1987). The role of iron in the initiation of lipid peroxidation. Chem. Phys. Lipids 44, 191–208. doi: 10.1016/0009-3084(87)90050-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Mishra AK, and Mohanraju R (2018). Epiphytic bacterial communities in seagrass meadows of oligotrophic waters of andaman sea. Open Access Library J. 5, 1–12. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1104388 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Mishra S, Upadhyay RS, and Nautiyal CS (2013). Unravelling the beneficial role of microbial contributors in reducing the allelopathic effects of weeds. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97, 5659–5668. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-4885-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Moreno JC, Mi J, Alagoz Y, and Al-Babili S (2021). Plant apocarotenoids : From retrograde signaling to interspecific communication. Plant J. 105, 351–375. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Muthukrishnan R, Chiquillo KL, Cross C, Fong P, Kelley T, Toline CA, et al. (2020). Little giants: a rapidly invading seagrass alters ecosystem functioning relative to native foundation species. Mar. Biol. 167, 81. doi: 10.1007/s00227-020-03689-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Navas M-L, Garnier E, Austin MP, and Gifford RM (1999). Effect of competition on the responses of grasses and legumes to elevated atmospheric CO2 along a nitrogen gradient: differences between isolated plants, monocultures and multi-species mixtures. New Phytol. 143 (2), 323–331. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00443.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Nguyen HM, Yadav NS, Barak S, Lima FP, Sapir Y, and Winters G (2020). Responses of invasive and native populations of the seagrass halophila stipulacea to simulated climate change. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 812. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00812 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Oksanen J, Simpson GL, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, et al. (2025). “vegan: community ecology package,” in Vegan: Community Ecology Package. (Vienna: Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN)). [Google Scholar]
  77. Orr SP, Rudgers JA, and Clay K (2005). Invasive plants can inhibit native tree seedlings: testing potential allelopathic mechanisms. Plant Ecol. 181, 153–165. doi: 10.1007/s11258-005-5698-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Ouyang S, Tie L, Rao X, Cai X, Liu S, Vitali V, et al. (2023). Mixed-Species Acacia Plantation Decreases Soil Organic Carbon and Total Nitrogen Concentrations but Favors Species Regeneration and Tree Growth over Monoculture: A Thirty-Three-Year Field Experiment in Southern China. Forests 14, 968. doi: 10.3390/f14050968 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Parker MA (2001). Mutualism as a constraint on invasion success for legumes and rhizobia. Divers. Distrib. 7, 125–136. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2001.00103.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  80. Pascale A, Proietti S, Pantelides IS, and Stringlis IA (2020). Modulation of the root microbiome by plant molecules: the basis for targeted disease suppression and plant growth promotion. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Peeb A, Dang NP, Truu M, Nõlvak H, Petrich C, and Truu J (2022). Assessment of hydrocarbon degradation potential in microbial communities in Arctic sea ice. Microorganisms 10, 328. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Pereg LL, Lipkin Y, and Sar N (1994). Different niches of the Halophila stipulacea seagrass bed harbor distinct populations of nitrogen fixing bacteria. Mar. Bioliogy 119, 327–333. doi: 10.1007/BF00347529 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Pergent G, Boudouresque C-F, Dumay O, Pergent-Martini C, and Wyllie-Echeverria S (2008). Competition between the invasive macrophyte Caulerpa taxifolia and the seagrass Posidonia oceanica: contrasting strategies. BMC Ecol. 8, 20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6785-8-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Perreault R, and Laforest-Lapointe I (2022). Plant-microbe interactions in the phyllosphere: facing challenges of the anthropocene. ISME J. 16, 339–345. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01109-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Policelli N, Bruns TD, Vilgalys R, and Nuñez MA (2019). Suilloid fungi as global drivers of pine invasions. New Phytol. 222 (2), 714–725. doi: 10.1111/nph.15660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Pujalte MJ, Lucena T, Ruvira MA, Arahal DR, and Macián MC (2014). “The family rhodobacteraceae,” in The Prokaryotes: Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria. Eds. Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E and Thompson F (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg: ), 439–512. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-30197-1_377 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. (2013). The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Raniello R, Mollo E, Lorenti M, Gavagnin M, and Buia MC (2007). Phytotoxic activity of caulerpenyne from the Mediterranean invasive variety of Caulerpa racemosa: a potential allelochemical. Biol. Invasions 9, 361–368. doi: 10.1007/s10530-006-9044-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  89. R Core Team (2024). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (Vienna: Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN)). [Google Scholar]
  90. Ribicic D, Netzer R, Hazen TC, Techtmann SM, Drabløs F, and Brakstad OG (2018). Microbial community and metagenome dynamics during biodegradation of dispersed oil reveals potential key-players in cold Norwegian seawater. Mar. pollut. Bull. 129, 370–378. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.02.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Romero-González LE, Rojas-Vargas J, Muriel-Millán LF, Bustos-Martínez J, Bustamante VH, and Pardo-López L (2023). Genomic and phenotypic characterization of Pseudomonas sp. GOM7, a novel marine bacterial species with antimicrobial activity against multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. PloS One 18, e0288504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Rotini A, Mejia AY, Costa R, Migliore L, and Winters G (2017). Ecophysiological Plasticity and Bacteriome Shift in the Seagrass Halophila stipulacea along a Depth Gradient in the Northern Red Sea. Front. Plant Sci. 7. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.02015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Rout ME, and Callaway RM (2012). Interactions between exotic invasive plants and soil microbes in the rhizosphere suggest that ‘everything is not everywhere.’. Ann. Bot. 110, 213–222. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Rudgers JA, Mattingly WB, and Koslow JM (2005). Mutualistic fungus promotes plant invasion into diverse communities. Oecologia 144, 463–471. doi: 10.1007/s00442-005-0039-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Saha M, Wiese J, Weinberger F, and Wahl M (2016). Rapid adaptation to controlling new microbial epibionts in the invaded range promotes invasiveness of an exotic seaweed. J. Ecol. 104, 969–978. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12590 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  96. Sakata T, Yoshikawa T, and Nishitarumizu S (2011). Algicidal activity and identification of an algicidal substance produced by marine Pseudomonas sp. C55a-2. Fish. Sci. 77, 397–402. doi: 10.1007/s12562-011-0345-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  97. Saunier A, Coquin S, Hannibal L, Ortole C, de Montgolfier B, Lecareux C, et al. (2025). Volatilome differences between native and invasive seagrass species in the Caribbean area. Front. Mar. Sci. 12, 1641139. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1641139 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  98. Setiabudi GI, Antara KL, Maharani MDK, Anam HFS, Ismet MS, and Mahardika K (2026). Spatiotemporal Microbiome Shifts Across Functional Zones as Early Warning Bioindicators in Litopenaeus vannamei Aquaculture. In: BIO Web of Conferences. (EDP Sciences; ) 248, 02009. [Google Scholar]
  99. Sghaier YR, Zakhama-Sraieb R, and Charfi F (2014). “Effects of the invasive seagrass Halophila stipulacea on the native seagrass Cymodocea nodosa,” in Proceedings of the 5th Mediterranean symposium on marine vegetation. (Tunis: Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA)), 167–171. doi: 10.13140/2.1.3086.6888 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  100. Short FT, Moore GE, and Peyton KA (2010). Halophila ovalis in the tropical atlantic ocean. Aquat. Bot. 93, 141–146. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2010.05.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  101. Sims DA, and Gamon JA (2002). Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages. Remote Sens. Environ. 81 (2-3), 337–354. [Google Scholar]
  102. Smulders FOH, Vonk JA, Engel MS, and Christianen MJA (2017). Expansion and fragment settlement of the non-native seagrass Halophila stipulacea in a Caribbean bay. Mar. Biol. Res. 13, 967–974. doi: 10.1080/17451000.2017.1333620 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  103. Steiner SCC, and Willette DA (2010). “Distribution and size of benthic marine habitats in Dominica, Lesser Antilles.” Revista de Biologia Tropical 58, (2), 589–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Stuij TM (2018). Distinct Microbiomes in Three Tropical Seagrasses Around the Island of Curaçao: Halophila stipulacea, Halodule wrightii and Thalassia testudinum. Master's thesis. (Faro, Portugal: Universidade do Algarve; ). [Google Scholar]
  105. Teplitski M, Krediet CJ, Meyer JL, and Ritchie KB (2016). “Microbial interactions on coral surfaces and within the coral holobiont,” in The Cnidaria, Past, Present and Future: The World of Medusa and Her Sisters. Eds. Goffredo S and Dubinsky Z (Springer International Publishing, Cham: ), 331–346. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-31305-4_21 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  106. Ugarelli K, Chakrabarti S, Laas P, and Stingl U (2017). The seagrass holobiont and its microbiome. Microorganisms 5, 81. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms5040081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Van der Putten WH, Klironomos JN, and Wardle DA (2007). Microbial ecology of biological invasions. ISME J. 1, 28–37. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2007.9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Velikova V, Yordanov I, and Edreva A (2000). Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants: Protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci. 151, 59–66. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00197-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  109. Wahbeh MI, and Mahasneh AM (1984). Heterotrophic bacteria attached to leaves, rhizomes and roots of three seagrass species from Aqaba (Jordan). Aquat. Bot. 20, 87–96. doi: 10.1016/0304-3770(84)90029-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  110. Wang H, Zhong Y, Yang Q, Li J, Li D, Wu J, et al. (2025). Coupling of sulfate reduction and dissolved organic carbon degradation accelerated by microplastics in blue carbon ecosystems. Water Res. 279, 123414. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2025.123414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Weidner S, Arnold W, and Puhler A (1996). Diversity of uncultured microorganisms associated with the seagrass Halophila stipulacea estimated by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 766–771. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.3.766-771.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Weidner S, Arnold W, Stackebrandt E, and Pühler A (2000). Phylogenetic analysis of bacterial communities associated with leaves of the seagrass Halophila stipulacea by a culture-independent small-subunit rRNA gene approach. Microb. Ecol. 39 (1), 22–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Wickham H, Chang W, Henry L, Pedersen TL, Takahashi K, Wilke C, et al. (2025). ggplot2: Create Elegant Data Visualisations Using the Grammar of Graphics. R package. (Boston, Massachusetts: Posit Software, PBC; ). [Google Scholar]
  114. Wietz M, Duncan K, Patin NV, and Jensen PR (2013). Antagonistic interactions mediated by marine bacteria: the role of small molecules. J. Chem. Ecol. 39, 879–891. doi: 10.1007/s10886-013-0316-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Wietz M, Mansson M, Gotfredsen CH, Larsen TO, and Gram L (2010). Antibacterial compounds from marine vibrionaceae isolated on a global expedition. Mar. Drugs 8, 2946–2960. doi: 10.3390/md8122946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Willette DA, and Ambrose RF (2012). Effects of the invasive seagrass Halophila stipulacea on the native seagrass, Syringodium filiforme, and associated fish and epibiota communities in the Eastern Caribbean. Aquat. Bot. 103, 74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2012.06.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  117. Willette DA, Chalifour J, Debrot AOD, Engel MS, Miller J, Oxenford HA, et al. (2014). Continued expansion of the trans-Atlantic invasive marine angiosperm Halophila stipulacea in the Eastern Caribbean. Aquat. Bot. 112, 98–102. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2013.10.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  118. Winters G, Beer S, Willette DA, Viana IG, Chiquillo KL, Beca-Carretero P, et al. (2020). The tropical seagrass halophila stipulacea: reviewing what we know from its native and invasive habitats, alongside identifying knowledge gaps. Front. Mar. Sci. 7. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00300 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  119. Winters G, Conte C, Beca-Carretero P, Nguyen HM, Migliore L, Mulas M, et al. (2023). Superior growth traits of invaded (Caribbean) versus native (Red sea) populations of the seagrass Halophila stipulacea. Biol. Invasions 25, 2325–2342. doi: 10.1007/s10530-023-03045-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Wojahn JMA (2016). Metagenomics and Metatranscriptomics of the Leaf and Root-Associated Microbiomes of Zostera marina and Zostera japonica. (Oregon: Oregon State University; ). [Google Scholar]
  121. Yang S. (2023). otuSummary: Summarizing OTU Table Regarding the Composition, Abundance and Beta Diversity of Abundant and Rare Biospheres. otuSummary R package. (GitHub; ). [Google Scholar]
  122. Zandi P, and Schnug E (2022). Reactive oxygen species, antioxidant responses and implications from a microbial modulation perspective. Biology 11, 155. doi: 10.3390/biology11020155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Zhang Q, Yang R, Tang J, Yang H, Hu S, and Chen X (2010). Positive feedback between mycorrhizal fungi and plants influences plant invasion success and resistance to invasion. PloS One 5, e12380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Zhang X, Zhao C, Yu S, Jiang Z, Liu S, Wu Y, et al. (2020). Rhizosphere microbial community structure is selected by habitat but not plant species in two tropical seagrass beds. Front. Microbiol. 11. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Zhang X, Wu Y, Liu S, Li J, Jiang Z, Luo H, et al. (2024). Plant growth and development of tropical seagrass determined rhizodeposition and its related microbial community. Mar. pollut. Bull. 199, 115940. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115940 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Zhou W, Ding D, Yang Q, Ling J, Ahmad M, Lin X, et al. (2021). Diversity and abundance of diazotrophic communities of seagrass Halophila ovalis based on genomic and transcript level in Daya Bay, South China Sea. Arch. Microbiol. 203, 5577–5589. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02544-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table 1

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 1

Number of samples across treatments for biochemical, morphological, sediment, and microbial analyses in native, Cymodocea nodosa, and invasive, Halophila stipulacea. Values represent the number of composite samples (n). Treatments include Naturally Mixed, Reduced Mixed, Native Alone, and Invasive Alone. Photosynthetic pigments include chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids and oxidative stress markers include H2O2 and MDA. Morphological traits include growth, biomass, and internode length measured per treatment. Sediment nutrients include nitrate and nitrite concentrations. Microbial datasets include composite samples collected at the initial time point and final time point, with a subset retained for downstream analyses. PCR negative controls were included to account for contamination and sequencing artifacts.

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 2

Linear mixed effects model of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, MDA and H2O2. Numerator (numDF) and denominator (denDF), F-value and p-value are summarized.

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 3

Kruskal-Wallis statistics for Shannon alpha diversity. Significant values are bolded.

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 4

Kruskal-Wallis statistics for Pielou evenness (alpha diversity).

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 5

PERMANOVA, pairwise PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and betadisper statistics for beta diversity. Significant values are bolded.

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 6

PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and betadisper statistics for Scaling with Ranked Subsampling (SRS) beta diversity for all 18 samples. Significant values are bolded. Pairwise PERMANOVA: Not Significant.

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 7

Table of core taxa shared among all six groups and all groups except invasive alone (see Figure 6A).

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 8

Table of core taxa shared among C. nodosa groups (see Figure 6B).

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 9

Table of core taxa shared among H. stipulacea treatments (see Figure 6C).

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 10

Core microbiome taxa identified in mixed and reduced mixed treatments in the H. stipulacea heatmap and their putative function.

Suppl materials

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 1

(A) Rarefaction curve of total bacterial diversity for n=40 initial and final samples. (B) Rarefaction curve of total bacterial diversity for n=18 final samples.

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 2

Alpha bacterial diversity of the seagrass samples split by treatment and species, using Scaling with Ranked Subsampling (SRS). (A) Native, Cymodocea nodosa, fully natural mixed (red) box plot, dark blue represents native and invasive grown in reduced mixed treatments and blue represents the native when it grows alone, while the yellow box plot represents the invasive Halophila stipulacea, grown in fully natural mixed and pink is when the invasive grows alone. SRS measures were analyzed on the species level with marginal significance (p = 0.06657). (B) Beta bacterial diversity of native versus invasive seagrasses grown in fully natural mixed (pink), reduced mixed (blue), and alone (green) in a non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot with Bray-Curtis distances analyzed on the species level. Circles represent the native Cymodocea nodosa, while triangles represent the invasive Halophila stipulacea. Points are color-coded according by species and treatment.

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 3

Microbiome multivariable associations with linear models (MaAsLin 2) heatmaps based on the primary predictors of interest for each species. A red color (+) indicates positive correlation, while a blue color (−) indicates negative correlation. FDR q-value cutoff value was 0.05. Statistical significance is based on FDR-adjusted q-values (q ≤ 0.05). Effect sizes (coefficients) are shown for taxa significantly associated with metadata variables. (A) Heatmap of taxa correlated with significant changes in native groups only compared to the native mixed group with a low number of shoots. (B) Heatmap of taxa correlated with significant changes in invasive groups only compared to the invasive mixed group with a high number of shoots.

Data Availability Statement

The 16S rRNA raw sequence data have been deposited in the SRA of NCBI with BioProject Number PRJNA1291277 and assigned accession numbers SRR34539037-SRR34539076.

RESOURCES