Abstract
The inner wall of Schlemm’s canal (SC) is a specialized mechanosensitive endothelium in which pore formation is essential for normal conventional aqueous humor outflow and hence intraocular pressure homeostasis, yet the role of microtubule (MT) stability in this process remains poorly understood. Here, using SC cell primary cultures from normal and glaucomatous human eyes as well as mouse whole eye perfusion, we identify MTs as a key component of the mechanotransduction machinery linking the mechanical microenvironment to SC cell biomechanics and conventional outflow. We show that MT stability is modulated by substrate stiffness and diminished in glaucomatous SC cells. MT stabilization suppresses GEF-H1-dependent actomyosin contractility, reduces cellular stiffness, and promotes transcellular pore formation in both normal and glaucomatous SC cells, whereas MT destabilization elicits opposing effects. Consistent with these cellular responses, pharmacological MT stabilization enhances conventional outflow facility in ex vivo mouse eyes. Together, our findings establish MT-dependent cytoskeletal remodeling as a previously unrecognized mechanism linking extracellular mechanical cues to SC biomechanics and transcellular pore formation and highlight MT-associated signaling as a potential therapeutic target for improving conventional outflow in glaucoma.
Subject terms: Biophysics, Cell biology
Introduction
Glaucoma, a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, is a progressive, age-related optic neuropathy1. Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is a primary, and currently the only modifiable, risk factor for glaucoma progression. The trabecular meshwork and Schlemm’s canal (SC) endothelium together comprise the central functional unit of the conventional aqueous humor (AH) outflow pathway, which provides resistance to AH drainage and therefore plays a key role in determining IOP2,3. SC is an endothelial-lined vessel whose cells display phenotypic characteristics of both vascular and lymphatic endothelia4–8. The SC inner wall endothelium facilitates AH outflow by forming openings in its monolayer which are of two distinct types: paracellular pores, which open at cell-cell junctions, and transcellular pores, which typically develop through giant vacuole-associated transcellular channels within individual SC endothelial cells. More specifically, the basal-to-apical pressure gradient between the anterior chamber and the SC lumen deforms SC endothelial cells to generate giant vacuoles and transcellular pores7,9. In glaucoma, decreases in SC inner wall pore size and density have been consistently observed10,11, implicating impaired pore formation as a potential contributor to elevated outflow resistance and ocular hypertension.
To assess transcellular pore formation in SC cells, our laboratory previously developed an in vitro assay that applies localized basal-to-apical cellular deformation using microparticles, thereby recapitulating the key in vivo mechanical features of giant vacuole formation12. Using this pore formation and detection assay, we demonstrated that local cellular deformation imposed by particles underlying SC cells induces transcellular pore formation, and that treatments known to modulate intraocular pressure or outflow facility correspondingly alter transcellular pore formation. Moreover, transcellular pore formation was found to be closely associated with cellular stiffness, actomyosin contractility, and intracellular Ca2+ levels12,13.
The cytoskeleton, composed of actin filaments, microtubules (MTs), and intermediate filaments, is the principal determinant of cellular stiffness. In SC cells, actin polymerization is a key modulator of stiffness, with actin depolymerization reducing stiffness, whereas polymerization enhances it13–15. In contrast, the contribution of MTs to SC cell biomechanics remains largely unexplored in the context of glaucoma pathology. MTs are distinguished by their rapid dynamic reorganization16–18, enabling them to respond to intracellular and extracellular cues. Beyond their well-established roles in maintaining cell architecture19, vesicular transport20, and cell migration21,22, MTs function as mechano-active elements that integrate and transduce mechanical forces to mechanosensitive signaling pathways23,24. Importantly, MT stability is a critical determinant of this mechanobiological function, influencing cell contractility24–26 and stiffness23,27, both of which are closely linked to transcellular pore formation in SC cells and AH outflow. Thus, MT mechanobiology, and specifically MT stability, represents a critical yet understudied modulator of SC cell function and outflow dynamics.
Here, we investigated the role of MT stability in SC cells, with a particular focus on its modulation of actomyosin contractility, cellular stiffness, and mechanotransduction in response to substrate stiffness. Functionally, we examined how MT stabilization affects transcellular pore formation using our well-established in vitro assay, and how these mechanobiological processes ultimately influence AH outflow facility.
Results
MT stability affects SC cell actomyosin contractility
Schlemm’s canal (SC) cells are highly contractile, and their contractile state is closely associated with outflow facility and IOP28,29. To determine the role of MT stability, normal SC cells were treated with the MT stabilizer paclitaxel or the MT destabilizer nocodazole for 30 min. We confirmed that paclitaxel and nocodazole increased and decreased MT stability in SC cells, respectively (Fig. 1A, B and Supplementary Fig. 1), as assayed using MT acetylation as an established surrogate marker of MT stability30,31. To assess the impact of MT stability on SC cell contractility, we examined two key actomyosin-related markers: phosphorylated myosin light chain (p-MLC) levels and filamentous actin (F-actin) levels. Over short time scales (30 min), paclitaxel treatment significantly reduced p-MLC levels by 35.1% (p < 0.01; Fig. 1C, D) without affecting F-actin levels (Fig. 1E, F). In contrast, nocodazole treatment significantly increased both p-MLC (1.9-fold, p < 0.0001; Fig. 1C, D) and F-actin levels (1.9-fold, p < 0.0001; Fig. 1E, F), indicating enhanced actomyosin contractility following MT destabilization. Furthermore, prolonged paclitaxel treatment (24 h) markedly reduced F-actin stress fibers by 58.1% (p < 0.0001) and decreased p-MLC levels by 82.9% (p < 0.0001; Supplementary Fig. 2), suggesting that sustained MT stabilization is required to induce significant remodeling of F-actin. Together, these results demonstrate that MT stability negatively modulates actomyosin tone in SC cells.
Fig. 1. MT stability affects actomyosin contractility in normal Schlemm’s canal (nSC) cells.

A Representative immunoblot showing acetylated-α tubulin (Ac-α tubulin) and total α tubulin in nSC cells treated for 30 minutes with control (DMSO), 10 μM paclitaxel (Pac; MT stabilizer), or 10 μM nocodazole (Noc; MT destabilizer). B Quantification of immunoblot expressed as normalized ac-α tubulin/α tubulin ratios (n = 9 replicates from 3 different nSC cell strains, with three independent replicates per strain). C, E Representative fluorescence micrographs of F-actin and phosphorylated myosin light chain (p-MLC) in nSC cells under the same treatment conditions for 30 min: control (DMSO), 10 μM paclitaxel (Pac), or 10 μM nocodazole (Noc). Scale bar, 20 μm. D, F Quantification of normalized F-actin and p-MLC fluorescence intensities (n = 30 images per group from 3 different nSC cell strains, with three independent replicates per strain). Symbols of the same color represent data from the same cell strain. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons tests (**p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001).
MT stability mediates SC cell actomyosin contractility via GEF-H1
RhoA, a key member of the mammalian Rho GTPase family, is essential for actomyosin regulation. Upon activation, RhoA promotes the formation of actomyosin contractile structures through its downstream effector proteins, including formin, which drive linear actin polymerization, and Rho-associated kinase (ROCK), which phosphorylates the MLC to enhance myosin II–mediated contractility32,33. RhoA activation is mediated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs)34, including GEF-H1, a MT-associated Rho GEF that remains inactive while bound to MTs but becomes activated and released upon MT destabilization35,36. To determine the possible role of GEF-H1 in MT-mediated SC cell contractility, we used siRNA to knock down GEF-H1 expression. Following 48 h of siRNA treatment in nSC cells, GEF-H1 mRNA levels were reduced by 79% (Fig. 2A), with a corresponding 55.1% reduction in GEF-H1 protein levels (Fig. 2B).
Fig. 2. MT stability modulates actomyosin contractility in nSC cells via GEF-H1.

A Normalized GEF-H1 mRNA levels in nSC cells are reduced following siGEF-H1 treatment for 48 h, as determined by qRT-PCR (normalization to GAPDH levels followed by normalization to control siRNA treatment; n = 3 replicates from one cell strain). B Representative immunoblot (top) showing acetylated-α tubulin (ac-α tubulin) and total α tubulin in nSC cells, with quantification (bottom) expressed as normalized ac-α tubulin/α tubulin ratios following 48 hour control and GEF-H1 siRNA treatments (n = 3 replicates from one cell strain). C Representative fluorescence micrographs of F-actin and p-MLC in nSC cells under the following conditions: siControl (siCtrl) + DMSO, siCtrl + 10 μM nocodazole (Noc), siGEF-H1 + DMSO, or siGEF-H1 + 10 μM Noc. Cells were treated with siRNA for 48 h followed by nocodazole treatment for 30 min. Scale bar, 20 μm. D, E Quantification of normalized F-actin and p-MLC fluorescence intensities (n = 30 images per group from 3 different nSC cell strains, with three independent replicates per strain). Symbols of the same color represent data from the same cell strain. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons tests (**p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001).
We observed that GEF-H1 knockdown significantly reduced p-MLC levels without altering F-actin levels (Fig. 2C–E). Consistent with our previous findings (Fig. 1), nocodazole treatment significantly increased both F-actin stress fibers and p-MLC levels; however, these effects were abolished by GEF-H1 knockdown. Notably, co-treatment with siGEF-H1 and nocodazole restored F-actin and p-MLC levels to those observed in siCtrl-treated cells under control conditions (Fig. 2C–E). Taken together, these findings identify GEF-H1 as a key mediator linking MT destabilization to RhoA–ROCK–dependent actomyosin contractility in SC cells.
MT stability modulates SC cell stiffness and transcellular pore formation
Most AH crosses the continuous endothelial monolayer formed by SC inner wall cells by passing through micron-sized pores, and pore density is decreased in glaucoma11. Transcellular pore formation in SC cells has been shown to be related to cell stiffness and contractility12,14,15. We used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to measure normal SC cell stiffness, finding that MT stabilization decreased SC cell stiffness by 36.4% (p < 0.01), whereas MT destabilization increased SC cell stiffness by 44.0% (p < 0.001) (Fig. 3A). We then examined whether MT stability affects transcellular pore formation in normal SC cells. To assess transcellular pore formation, we used an in vitro cell-based assay previously developed by our lab, in which SC cells are seeded on microparticles (4.0–4.9 μm in diameter) that locally deform the cell and promote transcellular pore formation12,13. Transcellular pore formation, induced by microparticles, is detected using a fluorescently-tagged streptavidin which traverses SC cells at pore sites and irreversibly binds to an underlying biotinylated substrate, producing a persistent and detectable fluorescent signal. Consistent with our previous observations, normal SC cells formed transcellular pores induced by microparticles (Fig. 3B). To investigate the role of MT stability in SC cell pore formation, cells were seeded onto particles and treated with either 10 µM paclitaxel (MT stabilizer) or 10 µM nocodazole (MT destabilizer) for 30 min, after which pore formation was assessed (Fig. 3C). Consistent with the changes in cell stiffness, MT stabilization increased transcellular pore formation rate from 9.0 to 11.5%, whereas MT destabilization reduced pore formation rate to 4.9% (Fig. 3D). Together, these results demonstrate that MT stability in SC cells plays a critical role in modulating cell stiffness and transcellular pore formation, suggesting that MT stability may influence outflow facility and IOP.
Fig. 3. MT stability is associated with nSC cell stiffness and transcellular pore formation.

A Young’s modulus measured by AFM in nSC cells exposed to control (DMSO), 10 μM paclitaxel (Pac), or 10 μM nocodazole (Noc) for 30 min (n = 32–35 cells per group from 3 different nSC cell strains). B The left panel shows a representative fluorescent micrograph merged with a brightfield image, allowing identification of microbead locations (white circles). The right panel shows the same field of view with the brightfield channel turned off, allowing identification of spots where fluorescently tagged streptavidin (green) has bound with the biotin substrate under cultured SC cells (at sites of intracellular pores) as well as surrounding regions not covered by cells. White circles outline particles. The arrow indicates a particle-induced pore. Scale bar: 20 μm. C Schematic showing the time course of the pore formation assay: SC cells were seeded atop particles on a biotinylated gelatin-coated glass substrate. Three and half hours after cell seeding, the relevant treatment (DMSO [control], 10 μM paclitaxel, or 10 μM Nocodazole) was introduced into the culture media and incubated for 30 min. Then fluorescently-tagged streptavidin plus the relevant treatment were introduced into the culture media and incubated for 5 additional mins. Created with BioRender.com. D Pore incidence (ratio of pore-associated particles to particles under cells) in nSC cells (n = 17–26 wells from 3 different nSC cell strains). Symbols with different colors represent different cell strains. The lines and error bars indicate Mean ± SD. Significance was determined by two-way ANOVA using multiple comparisons (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).
MT stability is mechano-responsive to substrate stiffness in SC cells
The trabecular meshwork, which serves as the substrate for SC inner wall cells, has been shown to be significantly stiffer in glaucoma, with normal trabecular meshwork exhibiting a stiffness of approximately 0.5-9 kPa as measured by AFM, whereas glaucomatous tissue is approximately 1.5–20-fold stiffer depending on the measurement method and the location of measurement37–40. In our previous work, we developed a tissue-mimetic hydrogel system with defined elastic moduli of 2.36 kPa (soft) and 8.00 kPa (stiff), as measured by AFM13. These stiffness values were selected to provide well-defined substrates that model the relative increase in stiffness known to occur in the glaucomatous trabecular meshwork. To assess whether substrate stiffness affects MT stability in SC cells, normal SC cells were cultured on these previously developed soft and stiff fibronectin-coated hydrogel substrates, which were used to mimic the inner wall basement membrane environment. Cells cultured on the stiff substrate exhibited significantly lower levels of tubulin acetylation (30.4% decrease, p < 0.0001) compared to those on the soft substrate, indicating reduced MT stability in response to increased substrate stiffness (Fig. 4). Collectively, these findings suggest that MT stability in SC cells is mechano-responsive to substrate stiffness, and that targeting MT stability may represent a potential strategy to mitigate glaucoma-associated pathological changes.
Fig. 4. Substrate stiffening reduces MT stability in nSC cells.

A Representative fluorescence micrographs of acetylated-α tubulin (ac-α tubulin) and total α tubulin (α tubulin) in nSC cells on soft and stiff hydrogel substrates. Scale bar, 20 μm. B Quantification of normalized acetylated-α tubulin/total α tubulin fluorescence (n = 35 images per group from 3 different nSC cell strains, with three independent replicates per strain). Symbols of the same color represent data from the same cell strain. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons tests (****p < 0.0001).
Reduced MT stability in glaucomatous SC is restored by pharmacological stabilization
Glaucomatous SC (gSC) cells, derived from patients with glaucoma, are known to be stiffer and exhibit a more fibrotic phenotype compared to non-glaucomatous SC cells13,15,41. Here, we observed that gSC cells displayed lower levels of acetylated MTs compared to nSC cells across multiple cell strains (Fig. 5A, B, D, E). When data were pooled between normal strains and between glaucomatous strains, nSC cells exhibited significantly higher MT acetylation levels than gSC cells (p < 0.0001; Fig. 5C, F). Interestingly, among the normal SC cell strains, the two younger donor-derived strains, nSC74 and nSC75, exhibited relatively lower tubulin acetylation compared with the two normal SC cell strains derived from older donors (Supplementary Fig. 3). These observations suggest that donor age may influence MT stability in SC cells.
Fig. 5. Glaucomatous SC (gSC) cells display reduced MT stability and increased pore formation rate upon MT stabilization.

A Representative fluorescence micrographs of acetylated-α tubulin (ac-α tubulin) and total α tubulin in nSC and gSC cells. Scale bar, 20 μm. B Quantification of normalized ac-α tubulin/α tubulin fluorescence intensity (n = 10 images per group, with three independent replicates per strain). C Pooled analysis of normalized ac-α tubulin/α tubulin fluorescence intensity in nSC vs. gSC cells. Small dots represent technical replicates, and large dots represent the mean for each cell strain. D Immunoblots showing ac-α tubulin and total α tubulin in nSC and gSC cells. E Quantification of immunoblot data expressed as normalized ac-α tubulin/α tubulin ratios (n = 6 independent replicates). F Pooled analysis of normalized ac-α tubulin/α tubulin ratios from immunoblot experiments comparing nSC vs. gSC cells. Small dots represent technical replicates, and large dots represent the mean for each cell strain. G Representative immunoblot showing ac-α tubulin and total α tubulin in gSC cells with and without MT stabilization with 10 µM paclitaxel for 30 minutes. H Quantification of immunoblot data expressed as normalized ac-α tubulin/α tubulin ratios with and without MT stabilization (n = 3 independent replicates). I Pore incidence (ratio of pore-associated particles to particles under cells) in gSC cells with and without MT stabilization (n = 3–6 wells). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons tests (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001).
We next evaluated the effects of the MT stabilizer paclitaxel in gSC cells. Paclitaxel treatment increased MT acetylation across the three gSC cell strains tested, indicating enhanced MT stability (Fig. 5G, H). Importantly, MT stabilization also significantly increased transcellular pore formation rate in gSC cells (Fig. 5I). Taken together, these findings demonstrate that SC cells from glaucoma patients exhibit reduced MT stability and that pharmacological MT stabilization enhances transcellular pore formation, suggesting a potential therapeutic avenue for restoring outflow function.
MT stabilization increases ex vivo outflow facility in mouse eyes
Previous studies have shown that MT acetylation levels are inversely associated with trabecular meshwork cell contractility42. Consistent with this result, our findings demonstrate that MT stabilization decreases SC cell contractility and stiffness while enhancing transcellular pore formation. Based on these observations, we hypothesized that increasing MT stability would enhance AH outflow through the conventional pathway, consistent with previous findings showing that MT stabilization lowers IOP42. To test this hypothesis, we cannulated the anterior chambers of paired enucleated wild-type C57BL/6 mouse eyes and perfused them with either vehicle or paclitaxel for 45 minutes. MT stabilization significantly increased ex vivo outflow facility by 44.3% compared with vehicle-treated controls (Fig. 6A, B), indicating that enhancing MT stability improves conventional outflow function. We further confirmed that paclitaxel perfusion increased MT stabilization in the trabecular meshwork and SC inner wall region (Fig. 6C, D). Together, these findings suggest that paclitaxel enhances outflow facility in ex vivo mouse eyes by stabilizing MTs in conventional outflow tissues.
Fig. 6. Perfusion with paclitaxel to enhance MT stabilization increases outflow facility in mouse eyes.

A Outflow facility measured in C57BL/6 J mouse eyes perfused with vehicle (1% DMSO) or 100 µM paclitaxel (N = 8 pairs of eyes). Outflow facility for each eye is shown as an individual data point with 95% confidence intervals. Different symbol shapes/fills indicate paired eyes. B Relative difference in outflow facility between paired eyes. Symbols correspond to the paired eyes shown in (A). Violin plots show the median and the 25th and 75th percentiles. C Representative immunofluorescence micrographs of frozen anterior segment sections stained for acetylated-α-tubulin (ac-α-tubulin; red) and total α-tubulin (pseudocolored gray to facilitate visualization of the red channel). CD31 staining (green) and brightfield imaging were used to visualize SC and identify the trabecular meshwork, and DAPI was used to label nuclei. The white line delineates the trabecular meshwork and SC inner wall. Scale bar, 50 μm. Note: In some sections, the SC lumen is not clearly visible, likely due to canal collapse during processing, causing contact between the SC inner and outer walls. CD31 was used to label SC endothelial cells, and in such cases, a line was drawn along the midpoint to delineate the inner wall. D Quantification of normalized ac-α tubulin/α tubulin fluorescence intensity in the trabecular meshwork and SC inner wall of perfused paired eyes (n = 2–3 sections per eye from three pairs of eyes). Different symbol shapes indicate paired eyes. Statistical significance was assessed using a paired t-test on log-transformed data in (A) and a nonparametric one-sample test against zero in (B), and two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons in (D) (**p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001).
Discussion
In this study, we show that MT stability plays an important role in SC cell mechanobiology, transcellular pore formation, and outflow facility. Specifically, MT stabilization reduced actomyosin contractility and cellular stiffness in SC cells, whereas MT destabilization produced the opposite effects. These changes were mediated through the MT-associated Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor GEF-H1. In SC cells derived from glaucoma patients, MT stability was reduced, suggesting that decreased MT stability may contribute to glaucoma pathology. Functionally, MT stabilization increased transcellular pore formation in SC cells from both healthy and glaucomatous donors and enhanced outflow facility in ex vivo mouse eyes. Together, these findings identify MT stability as an important determinant of SC inner wall biomechanics and AH outflow.
Both MTs and F-actin are key components of the cytoskeleton. MTs contribute to cell structure, intracellular transport, and spatial organization of signaling molecules, whereas F-actin generates contractile forces through actomyosin interactions43. Here, we show that MT stability influences F-actin stress fibers in SC cells. Long-term MT stabilization (i.e., 24 h) reduced F-actin polymerization, whereas MT destabilization increased actin stress fiber formation. Consistent with these changes, MT stabilization decreased p-MLC, while MT destabilization increased p-MLC levels. These results indicate that MT stability negatively modulates actomyosin contractility and thereby influences the mechanical phenotype of SC cells.
The trabecular meshwork, which forms the substrate underlying SC inner wall cells, is markedly stiffer in glaucomatous eyes than in normal eyes37–40. To model this substrate stiffening, we developed a biomimetic hydrogel system with defined soft and stiff substrates, as previously described13. Using this system, we previously demonstrated that normal SC cells cultured on stiffer substrates exhibit increased F-actin stress fiber formation and higher cellular stiffness13. Here, we further observed that normal SC cells cultured on stiff substrates displayed reduced MT stability, indicating that MTs in SC cells are mechanosensitive to substrate stiffness. Together with our findings linking MT stability to actomyosin contractility and cellular stiffness, these results suggest a potential bidirectional interplay between substrate stiffness and MT dynamics, in which substrate stiffness modulates MT stability, which in turn influences cytoskeletal organization and cell mechanics. Notably, MT responses to substrate stiffness appear to be cell type dependent. Similar to SC cells, epithelial cells have been reported to exhibit decreased MT stability when cultured on stiff substrates26. In contrast, fibroblasts25, B cells44 and astrocytes24 show increased MT stability under similar conditions, highlighting cell type-specific differences in MT-based mechano-responses.
SC cells derived from glaucoma patients exhibited reduced MT stability, which may contribute to increased cellular contractility and is consistent with the fibrotic phenotype previously reported in glaucomatous SC cells41. Interestingly, a recent study showed that acetylated tubulin was qualitatively increased, rather than decreased, in glaucomatous trabecular meshwork cells and tissues42, suggesting that tubulin acetylation may be differentially regulated across outflow pathway cell types. Of note, the normal and glaucomatous SC cell donors in this study were not age-matched, which is a common limitation in glaucoma research because glaucomatous donor eyes are typically obtained from older individuals. Specifically, all glaucomatous SC cell strains in this study were derived from donors over 70 years of age; however, two of the normal SC cell strains were also obtained from older donors within a comparable age range. Notably, these age-comparable normal SC cells still exhibited higher MT stability compared with glaucomatous SC cells, supporting the presence of disease-associated MT stability differences beyond those due to age alone (albeit based on only a small number of cell strains). We also observed that normal SC cell strains derived from younger donors exhibited relatively lower MT stability vs. those derived from older normal donors, suggesting that MT stability in normal SC cells may be related to donor age. However, this possible age-related difference will need to be confirmed using additional SC cell strains spanning a broader donor age range.
Tubulin acetylation is controlled by the balance between αTAT1-mediated acetylation and HDAC6-mediated deacetylation. Therefore, reduced acetylated tubulin in glaucomatous SC cells could reflect decreased αTAT1 activity, increased HDAC6 activity, or both. A recent study showed that αTAT1 and HDAC6 modulate tubulin acetylation in trabecular meshwork cells42, suggesting that similar regulatory mechanisms may contribute to altered MT stability in SC cells. Conversely, ROCK signaling and F-actin dynamics may also influence MT stability45–47, a possibility that remains to be investigated in future studies. Another important remaining question is whether reduced MT stability in glaucomatous SC cells is a primary defect or a consequence of glaucoma-associated stress. Our findings suggest that increased substrate stiffness reduces tubulin acetylation in normal SC cells, indicating that glaucoma-associated mechanical changes can induce MT instability. Conversely, our data also show that altered MT stability affects actomyosin contractility, cell stiffness, and transcellular pore formation, suggesting that MT instability may further contribute to SC cell dysfunction. Together, these observations raise the possibility that glaucoma-associated mechanical stress and reduced MT stability form a feed-forward cycle that contributes to SC cell dysfunction.
Our results further identify GEF-H1 as a signaling link between MT dynamics and actomyosin contractility. GEF-H1 is a MT-associated RhoA exchange factor that becomes activated upon MT depolymerization35,36. We observed that GEF-H1 knockdown reduced p-MLC levels without altering F-actin levels. Although GEF-H1 activates RhoA upstream of both ROCK and formin-mediated actin polymerization pathways, this preferential effect may reflect differential sensitivity of downstream pathways to RhoA signaling in nSC cells. In addition, compensation by other RhoGEFs or parallel actin regulatory pathways may preserve F-actin levels, while the ROCK–myosin axis remains more dependent on GEF-H1 activity. Alternatively, GEF-H1 knockdown may alter actin organization rather than total actin abundance, while p-MLC may represent a more sensitive readout of reduced contractility than bulk F-actin intensity. Consistent with this mechanism, MT stabilizer-induced increases in actomyosin contractility were abolished by GEF-H1 knockdown. These findings suggest that MT destabilization activates RhoA-ROCK signaling through GEF-H1 release in SC cells. Similar MT-dependent regulation of GEF-H1 has been reported in other cell types, including fibroblasts48 and lymphocytes49, indicating that this pathway may represent a conserved mechanism linking MT dynamics to cellular contractility.
Primary cilia are MT-based sensory organelles that function as important mechanosensors in many cell types50. The ciliary axoneme is composed of highly acetylated MTs, suggesting that MT stability may influence both the structure and function of primary cilia. In SC cells, primary cilia have been shown to play a role in shear stress-induced autophagy51, and loss of cilia in SC cells leads to decreased outflow facility52. These observations suggest that MT stability may influence SC cell mechanobiology not only through modulation of cytoskeletal mechanics but also through potential effects on cilia-dependent mechanosensory signaling.
SC inner wall cells facilitate AH drainage through the formation of pores, including both transcellular and paracellular pores10. Previous studies have shown that transcellular pore formation is strongly influenced by cellular stiffness and contractility12,15. In the present study, MT stabilization decreased cell contractility and softened SC cells. Of note, cell stiffness measurements depend on both the measurement method and substrate stiffness37,38,40,53, and therefore do not yield a single intrinsic value of cellular stiffness. Thus, the AFM measurements performed on glass coverslips in this study should be interpreted as relative changes in cell stiffness between treated and control cells under a defined experimental condition. Consistent with these mechanical changes, MT stabilization increased transcellular pore formation in both normal and glaucomatous SC cells, whereas MT destabilization reduced pore incidence. These effects were consistent with MT stability-linked changes in cellular stiffness, in agreement with previous observations that softer SC cells exhibit increased transcellular pore formation. In addition, our findings show that GEF-H1 knockdown decreased actomyosin contractility, suggesting that GEF-H1 may also regulate transcellular pore formation through RhoA/ROCK-mediated contractility as previously shown12, although this remains to be directly tested. Because pores provide low-resistance pathways for AH flow across the SC inner wall, MT-dependent changes in cell mechanics are likely to influence outflow resistance.
In addition to modulating actomyosin mechanics, MT stability may influence transcellular pore formation through vesicle trafficking and membrane remodeling. Formation of transcellular pores likely requires membrane fusion of the basal and apical plasma membranes, or between the plasma membrane and intracellular vesicles. MTs serve as primary routes for intracellular vesicle transport, supporting kinesin- and dynein-mediated trafficking of membrane vesicles that help maintain plasma membrane homeostasis54,55. Stabilization of MTs may therefore facilitate transcellular pore formation by promoting vesicle delivery and membrane protein redistribution during cellular deformation, whereas MT destabilization could impair vesicle transport and limit the membrane remodeling required for transcellular pore development. In addition, GEF-H1 has been reported to influence vesicle accumulation and organization in other cell types56. Further studies are needed to determine how MT stability modulates vesicle trafficking and membrane remodeling during transcellular pore formation.
Another important factor influencing transcellular pore formation in SC cells is intracellular Ca2⁺. Ca2⁺ has been shown to be essential for membrane fusion–driven transcellular formation and expansion12,57. Elevation of intracellular Ca2⁺ promotes membrane fusion58, vesicle trafficking59, and cytoskeletal remodeling60, processes that are likely required for the formation and enlargement of transcellular pores spanning the basal and apical plasma membranes. In SC cells, mechanosensitive Ca2⁺ influx has been shown to facilitate transcellular pore formation13. Given the known interactions between MTs and mechanosensitive signaling pathways, MT stability may also influence Ca2⁺-dependent processes during transcellular pore formation. For example, MTs may modulate the trafficking and spatial organization of ion channels and signaling complexes, thereby modulating mechanosensitive Ca2⁺ influx. How MT dynamics interact with Ca2⁺ signaling during transcellular pore formation in SC cells remains to be determined.
Finally, MT stabilization increased outflow facility in ex vivo mouse eyes. Paclitaxel increased facility relative to contralateral control eyes, indicating that MT-dependent cytoskeletal remodeling can influence AH outflow at the tissue level. Because perfused paclitaxel also reaches the trabecular meshwork, the increase in facility may not arise solely from effects on the SC inner wall but may also involve trabecular meshwork responses. Consistent with this interpretation, previous studies have shown that MT stability affects trabecular meshwork cell contractility and that MT stabilization can lower IOP in mouse eyes42. Although paclitaxel itself may not be suitable for therapeutic use, as it can be cytotoxic and interfere with cell division in ocular tissues such as corneal endothelial and trabecular meshwork cells61,62, these findings suggest that MT-related pathways may represent potential targets for improving outflow function. In particular, modulators such as GEF-H1 that influence MT stability may provide a more selective strategy to modulate SC cell mechanics and outflow.
SC inner wall cells facilitate AH drainage through pressure-dependent pore formation. Altered cellular biomechanics in these cells contributes to increased outflow resistance and elevated IOP in glaucoma. This study identifies MT stability as a modulator of SC cell mechanics, linking MT dynamics to actomyosin contractility, cellular stiffness, and transcellular pore formation. Pharmacological stabilization of MTs increased transcellular pore formation and enhanced outflow facility in mouse eyes. These findings reveal a previously unrecognized cytoskeletal mechanism modulating AH outflow and suggest that MT-dependent signaling pathways may represent potential targets for improving outflow function in glaucoma.
Methods
SC cell isolation and culture
Primary human SC cells were isolated from ostensibly normal and glaucomatous human donor eyes in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and HIPAA requirements under Duke University Health System IRB protocol (Pro00119283), as previously described. All donor eyes and corneal rims were screened by the Duke Eye Center Research Administration to ensure that appropriate informed consent had been obtained before the tissues were used in this study. Cells were cultured according to established protocols8,29. A total of four normal SC cell (nSC) strains isolated from healthy donor eyes and four glaucomatous cell (gSC) strains isolated from donors with a history of glaucoma were used in this study, for a total of eight independent SC cell strains (Table 1). All SC cell strains were characterized based upon their typical spindle-like elongated cell morphology, expression of vascular endothelial-cadherin and fibulin-2, a net transendothelial electrical resistance of 10 ohms cm2 or greater, and lack of myocilin induction following exposure to dexamethasone. Each experiment included three independent strains, with matched control and treatment conditions performed using the same strains, as listed in the final column of Table 1. All studies were conducted between passages 3–6. SC cells were cultured in low-glucose Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin/glutamine (PSG; Gibco) and maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Fresh media was supplied every 2–3 days.
Table 1.
SC cell strain information
| ID | Donor Age | Donor Sex | Facility (µL/min/mmHg) | Ophthalmic Medications | Figures in Which Cell Strain Was Used |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nSC74 | 8 months | Male | NM | N/A | All figures |
| nSC75 | 10 years | Male | NM | N/A | Figs. 2, 4, 5 and Supplementary Figs. S2, 3 |
| nSC82 | 56 years | Male | NM | N/A | Figs. 1, 3, 5 and Supplementary Figs. S2, 3 |
| nSC89 | 68 years | Male | NM | N/A | Figs. 1–5 and Supplementary Fig. S3 |
| gSC57 | 78 years | Male | NM | Unknown | Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig. S3 |
| gSC64 | 78 years | Male | 0.07 | Unknown | Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig. S3 |
| gSC90 | 71 years | Female | 0.25 | Cosopt and Latanoprost | Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig. S3 |
| gSC95 | 78 years | Male | 0.1 | N/A | Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig. S3 |
The first letter of the ID indicates normal (“n”) or glaucomatous (“g”). Outflow facility was measured in postmortem donor eyes.
NM not measured, N/A not applicable.
Hydrogel preparation
To prepare soft hydrogel substrates, the hydrogel precursor gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA [6% w/v final concentration], Advanced BioMatrix, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was mixed with lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate (LAP, 0.075% w/v final concentration) photoinitiator (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO). Stiff substrates also incorporated methacrylate-conjugated hyaluronic acid (MA-HA; [0.25% w/v final concentration], Advanced BioMatrix). Thirty microliters of the hydrogel solution were pipetted onto Surfasil-coated (Thermo Fisher Scientific) 18 × 18-mm square glass coverslips followed by placing 12-mm round silanized glass coverslips on top to facilitate even spreading of the polymer solution28,29,63–65. Hydrogels were crosslinked by exposure to UV light (CL-3000 UV Crosslinker; Analytik Jena, Germany) at 1 J/cm2. The hydrogel thickness was approximately 265 µm, calculated as the solution volume divided by the surface area of the gel on the coverslip. The hydrogel-adhered coverslips were removed with fine-tipped tweezers and placed hydrogel-side facing up in 24-well culture plates (Corning; Thermo Fisher Scientific). All the hydrogel substrates were coated with fibronectin (5 μg/cm2; Advanced BioMatrix) at room temperature for 1 h13,66 to provide a basement membrane-relevant adhesive substrate and to support consistent SC cell attachment and spreading67.
SC cell seeding and treatments
SC cells were seeded at 2 × 104 cells/cm2 on premade hydrogel substrates, glass coverslips, or tissue culture plates and cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% PSG for one or two days until ~80–90% confluence was reached. SC cells on coverslips or tissue culture plates were then exposed to reduced-serum media (DMEM with 1% FBS and 1% PSG) for 24 h, followed by treatment with the indicated agents, including the MT stabilizer paclitaxel (10 µM; Sigma), the MT destabilizer nocodazole (10 µM; Sigma), or vehicle control containing 0.2% DMSO. Cells cultured on hydrogels were similarly switched to DMEM with 1% FBS and 1% PSG for 2 days, followed by analysis of tubulin acetylation levels.
Immunocytochemistry staining analysis
SC cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Thermo Fisher Scientific) at room temperature for 15 min, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton™ X-100 for 15 min (Thermo Fisher Scientific), blocked with goat serum (BioGeneX, Fremont, CA, USA), and incubated with primary antibodies [anti-alpha Tubulin (acetyl K40), ab179484, Abcam, 1:1000; anti-alpha Tubulin, ab7291, Abcam, 1:1000; anti-phospho-myosin light chain 2 (Thr18/Ser19), 3764S, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:200)] followed by incubation with fluorescent secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor® 488 anti-Rabbit, A27034, Invitrogen, 1:500; Alexa Fluor® 546 anti-Mouse, A11003, Invitrogen, 1:500). Nuclei were counterstained with 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (5 μM, DAPI; Abcam, Waltham, MA, USA). Similarly, cells were stained with Phalloidin-iFluor 488 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific) or 594 (1:500, Cell signaling technology)/DAPI (Abcam) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Glass coverslips/hydrogel substrates were mounted with ProLong™ Gold Antifade (Invitrogen) on Superfrost™ microscope slides (Fisher Scientific), and fluorescent images were acquired with a Leica DM6 B upright microscope system or with a Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope system.
All fluorescent image analyses were performed using FIJI software68 (National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA). Fluorescence intensity of all F-actin or phospho-myosin light chain 2 (Thr18/Ser19) within the image was measured with image background subtraction. We then normalized the intensity by cell number and calculated fold-difference vs. control cells.
siRNA transfection
For siRNA-mediated GEF-H1 depletion experiments, SC cells were seeded at 2 × 104 cells/cm2 on glass coverslips, or tissue culture plates and cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% PSG. The following day, the cell culture medium was changed to antibiotic-free and serum-free DMEM and the samples were kept in culture for 24 h followed by transfection. Transfection was performed using a final concentration of 3% (v/v) lipofectamine RNAimax (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific) with 150 nM RNAi (ON-TARGETplus non-targeting siRNA or ON-TARGETplus Human ARHGEF2 siRNA SMARTpool, Horizon/Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis
Total RNA was extracted from SC cells using PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific). RNA concentration was determined with a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). RNA was reverse transcribed using iScript™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). One hundred nanograms of cDNA were amplified in duplicates in each 40-cycle reaction using a CFX 96 Real Time PCR System (BioRad) with annealing temperature set at 60 °C, Power SYBR™ Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and custom-designed qRT-PCR primers for GEF-H1 (Forward: TTTCAGGCATGACCATGTGC; Reverse: TTGCTTCTGCTTGACCTTGG). Transcript levels were normalized to GAPDH, and mRNA fold-change calculated relative to mean control values using the comparative CT method.
Immunoblot analysis
Protein was extracted from SC cells using lysis buffer (CelLyticTM M, Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with Halt™ protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Equal protein amounts (15 µg), determined by standard bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce; Thermo Fisher Scientific), in 4× loading buffer (Biorad) with 5% beta-mercaptoethanol (Fisher Scientific) were boiled for 5 min and subjected to SDS-PAGE using 4–15% Mini-PROTEAN® TGX™ gels (Biorad) at 200 V for 30 min and transferred to 0.45 µm PVDF membranes (Sigma; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Membranes were blocked with blocking buffer (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE) in tris-buffered saline with 0.2% Tween®20 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and probed with primary antibodies followed by incubation with fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibodies. Bound antibodies were visualized with the imager (LI-COR Odyssey CLx and Biorad). Densitometry was performed using image studio and image lab software; data were normalized to total α tubulin followed by calculation of relative change vs. control.
Cell and hydrogel stiffness measurement
SC cells were seeded at 2 × 104 cells/cm2 on glass coverslips and cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% PSG for one or two days until cells reached ~80–90% confluence. Then, SC cells were exposed to 10 μM paclitaxel or nocodazole for 30 min, as described above, followed by AFM-based stiffness measurements. These measurements were performed on glass coverslips to assess relative differences in cell stiffness between treated and control cells. An MFD-3D AFM (Asylum Research, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) was used to make stiffness measurements using silicon nitride cantilevers with an attached borosilicate sphere (diameter = 10 μm; nominal spring constant = 0.1 N/m; Novascan Technologies, Inc., Ames, IA, USA). Cantilevers were calibrated by measuring the thermally induced motion of the unloaded cantilever before measurements. The trigger force was set to 600 pN to avoid substrate effects and the tip velocity was adjusted to 800 nm/s to avoid viscous effects69. Five measurements/cell were conducted in cytoplasmic regions between the nucleus and cell periphery, avoiding the nuclear region and cell edges, and at least 5 cells were measured/group of one cell strain. For hydrogel stiffness measurement, a force map covering a 20 × 20 μm area (5 × 5 grid of points) was measured. Data from AFM measurements were fitted to the Hertz model to calculate the effective Young’s modulus of the cells, assuming the Poisson’s ratio was 0.5.
Intracellular pore detection assay
16-well chambered glass bottom plates (Invitrogen) were plasma-treated and coated with 0.5 mg/mL biotinylated gelatin overnight at 37 °C. The gelatin was then crosslinked with microbial transglutaminase (0.1 unit/µL, Sigma-Aldrich) at 37 °C overnight. After UV sterilization of the plate, carboxyl ferromagnetic particles (4.0–4.9 µm; Spherotech Inc.) were added at a density that typically resulted in approximately two particles per cell, incubated at room temperature for 10 min, and followed by three gentle PBS washes. SC cells were seeded on top of the particles at a density of 7.5 × 10³ cells/cm² in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% PSG, and incubated for 3.5 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
SC cells were treated with 0.2% DMSO, 10 µM paclitaxel, or 10 µM nocodazole in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% PSG for 30 min. Cells were then incubated with a fluorescent tracer (Streptavidin, Alexa Fluor™ 488 conjugate; Invitrogen) under the indicated treatment conditions (0.2% DMSO, 10 µM paclitaxel, or 10 µM nocodazole) in DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1% PSG for 5 min. The cells were then immediately washed three times with PBS, fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X for 15 min, and stained with Phalloidin-594 (Cell Signaling Technology) and DAPI. The glass cover was detached from the 16-well chambered system using a coverglass removal tool (Invitrogen), mounted on another glass slide with Prolong Gold Antifade Mountant (Invitrogen), and stored in the dark at 4 °C until examination with a Leica DM6 B upright microscope system. Fluorescent and brightfield images were acquired using a 10x objective to generate tile scans for each well.
For the transcellular pore formation analysis, a 4 mm diameter circle was delineated at the center of each tile-scanned well image to exclude cells near the well edges, restricting the analysis to cells within this circle. The numbers of cells, particles beneath cells, and pores co-localized with particles were manually counted. The percentage of particle-induced pores was quantified as the number of pores associated with particles divided by the number of particles under cells, multiplied by 10012.
Outflow facility measurement
Outflow facility, defined as the mathematical inverse of conventional outflow resistance, was measured in enucleated eyes using the previously established iPerfusion system70. Eight C57BL/6 J mice (3 males and 5 females, 2–4 months old; Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) were used in this study. Mice were euthanized by CO2 inhalation, after which eyes were carefully enucleated and mounted in an eye holder positioned at the center of the perfusion chamber. The temperature-controlled chamber (35 °C) was filled with prewarmed Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline supplemented with 5.5 mM D-glucose (DBG), fully submerging the eyes. System sensors were calibrated before each measurement session to ensure accuracy and to confirm the absence of air bubbles or leaks, which can introduce substantial measurement errors. Perfusion needles were filled with filtered DBG containing 3% (2-Hydroxypropyl)-β-cyclodextrin (Sigma) to enhance drug solubility and supplemented with either paclitaxel (100 µM) or vehicle control (1% DMSO).
The paclitaxel concentration of 100 μM in the perfusate was higher that the concentration used in in vitro experiments so as to account for drug dilution within the anterior chamber. More specifically, without a 2-needle anterior chamber exchange, the drug concentration delivered to the outflow pathway is invariably less than the nominal concentration. We estimated this dilution using calculations (Dr. Joseph M. Sherwood, Imperial College London; personal communication) based on an assumed anterior chamber volume of 3 μL and expected flow rates of 16 nL/min at 8 mmHg70,71 to estimate a paclitaxel concentration in the conventional outflow pathway of ~20 μM after 45 min of preconditioning.
Following cannulation, one eye was perfused with paclitaxel, while the contralateral eye was perfused with DMSO as the vehicle control at 8 mmHg for 45 min (preconditioning period) before facility measurements were initiated. Outflow facility was then determined using a nine-step pressure protocol starting at 5 mmHg, increasing in 1.5 mmHg increments up to 17 mmHg, and ending with a final step at 8 mmHg. The resulting flow-pressure data were fit with an empirical power-law relationship [Q(P) = Cr(P/Pr)β], where P is the measured steady-state pressure, Q is the measured steady-state flow rate at each pressure step, and Pr is the reference pressure (8 mmHg), which approximates the physiological pressure drop across the conventional outflow pathway in living mice70. Cr is the facility evaluated at Pr = 8 mmHg, and β is a nonlinearity parameter determined when fitting the model to the data. Based on the facility data, we quantified the net effect of paclitaxel by computing , where is reference facility and subscripts denote paclitaxel-treated (Pac) and control eyes (ctrl). This computed quantity can be interpreted as the relative difference in outflow facility between control and paclitaxel-treated eyes, expressed as a percentage.
Immunohistochemistry analysis
Following ex vivo perfusion, whole eyes with the corneal cannulation needle track were fixed by immersion in 4% PFA overnight at 4 °C. PFA was then removed, and eyes were washed with DPBS. Three pairs of eyes (both control and paclitaxel-treated) showing a significant outflow facility response to the drug (i.e., net facility change >30%) were used for immunohistochemistry studies. Eyes were hemisected along the equator and the posterior segments and lenses removed. The anterior segments were then cut into four quadrants. Each quadrant was placed in 30% sucrose overnight at 4 °C, embedded in Tissue-PlusTM O.C.T. Compound (Fisher Scientific) in a 10 × 10 × 5-mm cryomold. Blocks were cut to create 10-µm sections using a cryostat (Leica Biosystems Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). Sections were placed on positively charged slides, followed by incubating in a 37 °C oven for 10 min. Sections were then blocked with 10% goat serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with primary antibodies [anti-CD31, MAB1398Z, Sigma-Aldrich, 1:100; anti-alpha Tubulin (acetyl K40), ab179484, Abcam, 1:200; anti-alpha Tubulin, ab7291, Abcam, 1:200] overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with fluorescent secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor® 488 anti-American Hamster, Invitrogen, 1:500; Alexa Fluor® 546 anti-Rabbit, Invitrogen, 1:500; Alexa Fluor® 647 anti-Mouse, Invitrogen, 1:500) for 1 h at room temperature. Nuclei were counterstained with 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (5 μM, DAPI; Abcam, Waltham, MA, USA). Slides were mounted with ProLongTM Gold Antifade (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and fluorescent images were acquired with a Nikon Ti2 microscope with A1R confocal as z- stack with 1 μm step interval. The trabecular meshwork and SC inner wall region was outlined using merged brightfield, DAPI, and CD31 images. Fluorescence intensity of acetylated-α tubulin (ac-α tubulin) and total α tubulin was measured within the region of interest from maximum intensity projections using FIJI software (NIH) with image background subtraction, The Ac-α-tubulin/total α-tubulin ratio was then calculated and expressed as fold change vs. control.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism (v11.0.1; Boston, MA), with a significance (Type I error) threshold set at p = 0.05. Sample sizes are specified in each figure caption. All data sets, except for AFM and iPerfusion, were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test and were confirmed to meet the normality criteria (p > 0.05). The AFM and iPerfusion data sets, which are expected to be log-normally distributed70,72, were tested for log-normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test on log-transformed data, and met the relevant criteria (p > 0.05). Comparisons between groups were assessed by t-test, one-way or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparisons post hoc tests, or a suitable nonparametric test, as appropriate.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This study was financially supported by BrightFocus Foundation G2024003F (HL); National Institutes of Health R01EY028608 (WDS), R01EY022359 (WDS), R01EY030124 (CRE and WDS), R21EY035468 (AJF), and R01EY030871 (AJF); Vision Training Grant T32 EY007092-38 (NSFG) and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation G-2019-11435 (NSFG); the National Institutes of Health NEI P30 core grant P30EY006360, and a Challenge Grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc. to the Department of Ophthalmology at Emory University, Georgia Research Alliance (CRE), and Emory Ophthalmology Departmental funds (CRE).
Author contributions
Conceptualization: H.L. and C.R.E.; Investigation: H.L., N.S.F.G., K.M.P., M.C., A.J.F., W.D.S., C.R.E. designed all experiments, collected, analyzed, and interpreted the data. N.S.F.G. and A.J.F. assisted with the outflow facility measurements using the iPerfusion system and with data analysis. K.M.P. isolated and characterized the primary human SC cells. M.C. performed confocal imaging for the mouse eye anterior sections following outflow facility measurements; Writing – original draft: H.L. and C.R.E.; Writing—review and editing: all authors. Supervision: C.R.E.
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available owing to the volume and file size of the raw data but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s44341-026-00055-5.
References
- 1.Quigley, H. A. & Broman, A. T. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br. J. Ophthalmol.90, 262–267 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Braunger, B. M., Fuchshofer, R. & Tamm, E. R. The aqueous humor outflow pathways in glaucoma: A unifying concept of disease mechanisms and causative treatment. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.95, 173–181 10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.04.029 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stamer, W. D. The cell and molecular biology of glaucoma: mechanisms in the conventional outflow pathway. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.53, 2470–2472 10.1167/iovs.12-9483f (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ashpole, N. E., Overby, D. R., Ethier, C. R. & Stamer, W. D. Shear stress-triggered nitric oxide release from Schlemm’s canal cells. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.55, 8067–8076 10.1167/iovs.14-14722 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dautriche, C. N., Tian, Y., Xie, Y. & Sharfstein, S. T. A closer look at schlemm’s canal cell physiology: implications for biomimetics. J. Funct. Biomater.6, 963–985 10.3390/jfb6030963 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stamer, W. D. et al. Biomechanics of Schlemm’s canal endothelium and intraocular pressure reduction. Prog. Retin Eye Res.44, 86–98 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.08.002 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ethier, C. R. The inner wall of Schlemm’s canal. Exp. Eye Res.74, 161–172 10.1006/exer.2002.1144 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stamer, W. D., Roberts, B. C., Howell, D. N. & Epstein, D. L. Isolation, culture, and characterization of endothelial cells from Schlemm’s canal. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.39, 1804–1812 (1998). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ethier, C. R., Coloma, F. M., Sit, A. J. & Johnson, M. Two pore types in the inner-wall endothelium of Schlemm’s canal. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.39, 2041–2048 (1998). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.HOLMBERG, A. The Fine Structure of the Inner Wall of Schlemm’s Canal. A. M. A. Arch. Ophthalmol.62, 956–958 10.1001/archopht.1959.04220060028005 (1959). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Johnson, M. et al. The pore density in the inner wall endothelium of schlemm’s canal of glaucomatous eyes. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.43, 2950–2955 (2002). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Siadat, S. M. et al. Endothelial cell stiffness and type drive the formation of biomechanically induced transcellular pores. Cell Rep.45 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116668 (2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Li, H. et al. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 modulates substrate stiffness mechanosensing and transcellular pore formation in human Schlemm’s canal cells. Acta Biomater 10.1016/j.actbio.2025.09.039 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 14.Zhou, E. H. et al. Mechanical responsiveness of the endothelial cell of Schlemm’s canal: scope, variability and its potential role in controlling aqueous humour outflow. J. R. Soc. Interface9, 1144–1155 10.1098/rsif.2011.0733 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Overby, D. R. et al. Altered mechanobiology of Schlemm’s canal endothelial cells in glaucoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA111, 13876–13881 10.1073/pnas.1410602111 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gardner, M. K., Zanic, M. & Howard, J. Microtubule catastrophe and rescue. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.25, 14–22 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.09.006 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hawkins, T., Mirigian, M., Selcuk Yasar, M. & Ross, J. L. Mechanics of microtubules. J. Biomech.43, 23–30 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.005 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mitchison, T. & Kirschner, M. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature312, 237–242 10.1038/312237a0 (1984). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fletcher, D. A. & Mullins, R. D. Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton. Nature463, 485–492 10.1038/nature08908 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fourriere, L., Jimenez, A. J., Perez, F. & Boncompain, G. The role of microtubules in secretory protein transport. J. Cell Sci.133 10.1242/jcs.237016 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 21.Garcin, C. & Straube, A. Microtubules in cell migration. Essays Biochem.63, 509–520 10.1042/ebc20190016 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bouchet, B. P. & Akhmanova, A. Microtubules in 3D cell motility. J. Cell Sci.130, 39–50 10.1242/jcs.189431 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lyons, J. S. et al. Microtubules tune mechanotransduction through NOX2 and TRPV4 to decrease sclerostin abundance in osteocytes. Sci. Signal10 10.1126/scisignal.aan5748 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24.Seetharaman, S. et al. Microtubules tune mechanosensitive cell responses. Nat. Mater.21, 366–377 10.1038/s41563-021-01108-x (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wen, D. et al. Matrix stiffness-induced α-tubulin acetylation is required for skin fibrosis formation through activation of Yes-associated protein. MedComm4, e319 10.1002/mco2.319 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Heck, J. N. et al. Microtubules regulate GEF-H1 in response to extracellular matrix stiffness. Mol. Biol. Cell23, 2583–2592 10.1091/mbc.E11-10-0876 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Coleman, A. K., Joca, H. C., Shi, G., Lederer, W. J. & Ward, C. W. Tubulin acetylation increases cytoskeletal stiffness to regulate mechanotransduction in striated muscle. J. Gen. Physiol.153 10.1085/jgp.202012743 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Li, H. et al. Targeting YAP/TAZ mechanosignaling to ameliorate stiffness-induced Schlemm’s canal cell pathobiology. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.326, C513–C528 10.1152/ajpcell.00438.2023 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Li, H. et al. YAP/TAZ mediate TGFβ2-induced Schlemm’s canal cell dysfunction. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.63, 15–15 10.1167/iovs.63.12.15 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Eshun-Wilson, L. et al. Effects of α-tubulin acetylation on microtubule structure and stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA116, 10366–10371 10.1073/pnas.1900441116 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Saunders, H. A. J. et al. Acetylated α-tubulin K394 regulates microtubule stability to shape the growth of axon terminals. Curr. Biol.32, 614–630.e615 10.1016/j.cub.2021.12.012 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kühn, S. & Geyer, M. Formins as effector proteins of Rho GTPases. Small GTPases5, e29513 10.4161/sgtp.29513 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kümper, S. et al. Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) function is essential for cell cycle progression, senescence and tumorigenesis. eLife5, e12203 10.7554/eLife.12203 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lawson, C. D. & Ridley, A. J. Rho GTPase signaling complexes in cell migration and invasion. J. Cell Biol.217, 447–457 10.1083/jcb.201612069 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Birkenfeld, J., Nalbant, P., Yoon, S. H. & Bokoch, G. M. Cellular functions of GEF-H1, a microtubule-regulated Rho-GEF: is altered GEF-H1 activity a crucial determinant of disease pathogenesis? Trends Cell Biol.18, 210–219 10.1016/j.tcb.2008.02.006 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Meiri, D. et al. Mechanistic insight into GPCR-mediated activation of the microtubule-associated RhoA exchange factor GEF-H1. Nat. Commun.5, 4857 10.1038/ncomms5857 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vahabikashi, A. et al. Increased stiffness and flow resistance of the inner wall of Schlemm’s canal in glaucomatous human eyes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA116, 26555–26563 10.1073/pnas.1911837116 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wang, K. et al. Estimating human trabecular meshwork stiffness by numerical modeling and advanced OCT Imaging. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.58, 4809–4817 10.1167/iovs.17-22175 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang, K., Read, A. T., Sulchek, T. & Ethier, C. R. Trabecular meshwork stiffness in glaucoma. Exp. Eye Res.158, 3–12 10.1016/j.exer.2016.07.011 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Last, J. A. et al. Elastic modulus determination of normal and glaucomatous human trabecular meshwork. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.52, 2147–2152 10.1167/iovs.10-6342 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kelly, R. A. et al. Fibrotic Changes to Schlemm’s canal endothelial cells in glaucoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22 10.3390/ijms22179446 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 42.Su, C. C. et al. Tubulin acetylation enhances microtubule stability in trabecular meshwork cells under mechanical stress. InvestIG. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.66, 43 10.1167/iovs.66.1.43 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Goode, B. L., Drubin, D. G. & Barnes, G. Functional cooperation between the microtubule and actin cytoskeletons. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.12, 63–71 10.1016/S0955-0674(99)00058-7 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Aceitón, P. et al. B cell mechanotransduction via ATAT1 coordinates actin and lysosomal dynamics at the immune synapse. J. Cell Biol.224 10.1083/jcb.202407181 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 45.Kadir, S., Astin, J. W., Tahtamouni, L., Martin, P. & Nobes, C. D. Microtubule remodelling is required for the front-rear polarity switch during contact inhibition of locomotion. J. Cell Sci.124, 2642–2653 10.1242/jcs.087965 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Xu, Z. et al. Microtubules acquire resistance from mechanical breakage through intralumenal acetylation. Science356, 328–332 10.1126/science.aai8764 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Scaife, R. M., Job, D. & Langdon, W. Y. Rapid microtubule-dependent induction of neurite-like extensions in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts by inhibition of ROCK and Cbl. Mol. Biol. Cell14, 4605–4617 10.1091/mbc.e02-11-0739 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chang, Y. C., Nalbant, P., Birkenfeld, J., Chang, Z. F. & Bokoch, G. M. GEF-H1 couples nocodazole-induced microtubule disassembly to cell contractility via RhoA. Mol. Biol. Cell19, 2147–2153 10.1091/mbc.e07-12-1269 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pineau, J. et al. Microtubules restrict F-actin polymerization to the immune synapse via GEF-H1 to maintain polarity in lymphocytes. eLife11, e78330 10.7554/eLife.78330 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kiesel, P. et al. The molecular structure of mammalian primary cilia revealed by cryo-electron tomography. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.27, 1115–1124 10.1038/s41594-020-0507-4 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shim, M. S. et al. Shear stress induces autophagy in Schlemm’s canal cells via primary cilia-mediated SMAD2/3 signaling pathway. Autophagy Rep.2 10.1080/27694127.2023.2236519 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 52.Kizhatil, K. & Clark, G. Primary cilia and aqueous humor outflow. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.65, 4261–4261 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 53.Raghunathan, V. K. et al. Glaucomatous cell derived matrices differentially modulate non-glaucomatous trabecular meshwork cellular behavior. Acta Biomater.71, 444–459 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.037 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Verdeny-Vilanova, I. et al. 3D motion of vesicles along microtubules helps them to circumvent obstacles in cells. J. Cell Sci.130, 1904–1916 10.1242/jcs.201178 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.D’Souza, A. I., Grover, R., Monzon, G. A., Santen, L. & Diez, S. Vesicles driven by dynein and kinesin exhibit directional reversals without regulators. Nat. Commun.14, 7532 10.1038/s41467-023-42605-8 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pathak, R. et al. The microtubule-associated Rho activating factor GEF-H1 interacts with exocyst complex to regulate vesicle traffic. Dev. Cell23, 397–411 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.06.014 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lai, Y. et al. Fusion pore formation and expansion induced by Ca2+ and synaptotagmin 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA110, 1333–1338 10.1073/pnas.1218818110 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Tahir, M. A. et al. Calcium-triggered fusion of lipid membranes is enabled by amphiphilic nanoparticles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA117, 18470–18476 10.1073/pnas.1902597117 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sargeant, J. & Hay, J. C. Ca(2+) regulation of constitutive vesicle trafficking. Fac. Rev.11, 6 10.12703/r/11-6 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tsai, F.-C., Kuo, G.-H., Chang, S.-W. & Tsai, P.-J. Ca2+ Signaling in cytoskeletal reorganization, cell migration, and cancer metastasis. BioMed. Res. Int.2015, 409245 10.1155/2015/409245 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Choritz, L., Grub, J., Wegner, M., Pfeiffer, N. & Thieme, H. Paclitaxel inhibits growth, migration and collagen production of human Tenon’s fibroblasts-potential use in drug-eluting glaucoma drainage devices. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol.248, 197–206 10.1007/s00417-009-1221-4 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Pasquier, E. et al. Antiangiogenic activity of paclitaxel is associated with its cytostatic effect, mediated by the initiation but not completion of a mitochondrial apoptotic signaling pathway. Mol. Cancer Ther.3, 1301–1310 (2004). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Li, H., Henty-Ridilla, J. L., Bernstein, A. M., Ganapathy, P. S. & Herberg, S. TGFβ2 regulates human trabecular meshwork cell contractility via ERK and ROCK pathways with distinct signaling crosstalk dependent on the culture substrate. Curr. Eye Res. 1–41 10.1080/02713683.2022.2071943 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 64.Li, H., Raghunathan, V., Stamer, W. D., Ganapathy, P. S. & Herberg, S. Extracellular matrix stiffness and TGFβ2 Regulate YAP/TAZ activity in human trabecular meshwork cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.10 10.3389/fcell.2022.844342 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 65.Singh et al. in Glaucoma: Methods and Protocols (eds Tatjana Jakobs & Paloma B. Liton) 17–29 (Springer US, 2025).
- 66.Li, H. et al. Characterization, enrichment, and computational modeling of cross-linked actin networks in transformed trabecular meshwork cells. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.66, 65–65 10.1167/iovs.66.2.65 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hann, C. R., Springett, M. J., Wang, X. & Johnson, D. H. Ultrastructural localization of collagen IV, fibronectin, and laminin in the trabecular meshwork of normal and glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmic Res.33, 314–324 10.1159/000055687 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods9, 676–682 10.1038/nmeth.2019 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Vargas-Pinto, R., Gong, H., Vahabikashi, A. & Johnson, M. The effect of the endothelial cell cortex on atomic force microscopy measurements. Biophys. J.105, 300–309 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.034 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Sherwood, J. M., Reina-Torres, E., Bertrand, J. A., Rowe, B. & Overby, D. R. Measurement of outflow facility using iPerfusion. PLoS ONE11, e0150694 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kim, D. et al. In vivo quantification of anterior and posterior chamber volumes in mice: implications for aqueous humor dynamics. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.66, 18–18 10.1167/iovs.66.1.18 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wong, C. A. et al. A method for analyzing AFM force mapping data obtained from soft tissue cryosections. J. Biomech.168, 112113 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112113 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available owing to the volume and file size of the raw data but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
