Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Gut logoLink to Gut
. 1993 Mar;34(3):402–408. doi: 10.1136/gut.34.3.402

Radioisotope determination of regional colonic transit in severe constipation: comparison with radio opaque markers.

J R van der Sijp 1, M A Kamm 1, J M Nightingale 1, K E Britton 1, S J Mather 1, G P Morris 1, L M Akkermans 1, J E Lennard-Jones 1
PMCID: PMC1374150  PMID: 8472991

Abstract

Radio-opaque markers have a well established role in distinguishing between patients with normal and those with slow intestinal transit, but in the latter group their accuracy in defining the region of delay has not been established. To study regional colonic transit accurately the transit of a radioisotope labelled meal was determined and findings were compared with those of simultaneously ingested radio-opaque markers. Twelve healthy controls (mean age 33 years) and 12 severely constipated women (mean age 36 years, bowel frequency < once per week) were studied On day 1, a meal containing 10 MBq 111In bound to 0.7 mm resin microspheres was ingested. Subjects also ingested a set of radiologically distinguishable markers on three successive days. Abdominal scans were obtained three times daily for 7 days. Abdominal radiographs were obtained after 72 or 96 hours and again at 144 or 168 hours. Eight 'regions of interest' were created--one for the small bowel, six for the colon, and one for excreted stool. The constipated patients all showed colonic transit outside the normal range, with a variable site of delay demonstrated by time activity curves for each region. To provide a different measure of the effectiveness of colonic transport, the movement of the 'centre of mass' for the radioisotope and for the markers was then determined. The radioisotope and radiopaque marker methods gave similar results. At all times between 24 and 144 hours there was no significant difference for the position of the centre of mass between the radio-opaque and marker methods. At all times, however, the mean difference between the markers and the radioisotopes was positive, indicating that the center of mass of the markers was always head of that of the radioisotope. The mean difference between the methods was never greater than one region of interest, and ranged from 12 to 72% of one region of interest in the colon. The difference between these two methods could reach up to two colonic segments in certain patients at one time. Radioisotope ingestion provides accurate information about the transit through individual colonic regions because of the possibility of frequent observations and the clear delineation of the entire colon. Although these features were not obtained with radio-opaque markers, they are suitable as a screening test for the presence and pattern of colonic delay.

Full text

PDF
402

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arhan P., Devroede G., Jehannin B., Lanza M., Faverdin C., Dornic C., Persoz B., Tétreault L., Perey B., Pellerin D. Segmental colonic transit time. Dis Colon Rectum. 1981 Nov-Dec;24(8):625–629. doi: 10.1007/BF02605761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bassotti G., Gaburri M., Imbimbo B. P., Rossi L., Farroni F., Pelli M. A., Morelli A. Colonic mass movements in idiopathic chronic constipation. Gut. 1988 Sep;29(9):1173–1179. doi: 10.1136/gut.29.9.1173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chaussade S., Khyari A., Roche H., Garret M., Gaudric M., Couturier D., Guerre J. Determination of total and segmental colonic transit time in constipated patients. Results in 91 patients with a new simplified method. Dig Dis Sci. 1989 Aug;34(8):1168–1172. doi: 10.1007/BF01537263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hinton J. M., Lennard-Jones J. E., Young A. C. A ne method for studying gut transit times using radioopaque markers. Gut. 1969 Oct;10(10):842–847. doi: 10.1136/gut.10.10.842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kamm M. A., Lennard-Jones J. E., Thompson D. G., Sobnack R., Garvie N. W., Granowska M. Dynamic scanning defines a colonic defect in severe idiopathic constipation. Gut. 1988 Aug;29(8):1085–1092. doi: 10.1136/gut.29.8.1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kamm M. A., van der Sijp J. R., Hawley P. R., Phillips R. K., Lennard-Jones J. E. Left hemicolectomy with rectal excision for severe idiopathic constipation. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1991 Feb;6(1):49–51. doi: 10.1007/BF00703962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Krevsky B., Malmud L. S., D'Ercole F., Maurer A. H., Fisher R. S. Colonic transit scintigraphy. A physiologic approach to the quantitative measurement of colonic transit in humans. Gastroenterology. 1986 Nov;91(5):1102–1112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Krevsky B., Maurer A. H., Fisher R. S. Patterns of colonic transit in chronic idiopathic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 1989 Feb;84(2):127–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Martelli H., Devroede G., Arhan P., Duguay C., Dornic C., Faverdin C. Some parameters of large bowel motility in normal man. Gastroenterology. 1978 Oct;75(4):612–618. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mather S. J., Ellison D., Nightingale J., Kamm M., Britton K. E. The design of a two-phase radiolabelled meal for gastric emptying studies. Nucl Med Commun. 1991 May;12(5):409–416. doi: 10.1097/00006231-199105000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Metcalf A. M., Phillips S. F., Zinsmeister A. R., MacCarty R. L., Beart R. W., Wolff B. G. Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit. Gastroenterology. 1987 Jan;92(1):40–47. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90837-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Preston D. M., Lennard-Jones J. E. Anismus in chronic constipation. Dig Dis Sci. 1985 May;30(5):413–418. doi: 10.1007/BF01318172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Proano M., Camilleri M., Phillips S. F., Brown M. L., Thomforde G. M. Transit of solids through the human colon: regional quantification in the unprepared bowel. Am J Physiol. 1990 Jun;258(6 Pt 1):G856–G862. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1990.258.6.G856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Reynolds J. C., Ouyang A., Lee C. A., Baker L., Sunshine A. G., Cohen S. Chronic severe constipation. Prospective motility studies in 25 consecutive patients. Gastroenterology. 1987 Feb;92(2):414–420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Siegel J. A., Wu R. K., Knight L. C., Zelac R. E., Stern H. S., Malmud L. S. Radiation dose estimates for oral agents used in upper gastrointestinal disease. J Nucl Med. 1983 Sep;24(9):835–837. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Spiller R. C., Brown M. L., Phillips S. F. Decreased fluid tolerance, accelerated transit, and abnormal motility of the human colon induced by oleic acid. Gastroenterology. 1986 Jul;91(1):100–107. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90445-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stivland T., Camilleri M., Vassallo M., Proano M., Rath D., Brown M., Thomforde G., Pemberton J., Phillips S. Scintigraphic measurement of regional gut transit in idiopathic constipation. Gastroenterology. 1991 Jul;101(1):107–115. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90466-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Watier A., Devroede G., Duranceau A., Abdel-Rahman M., Duguay C., Forand M. D., Tétreault L., Arhan P., Lamarche J., Elhilali M. Constipation with colonic inertia. A manifestation of systemic disease? Dig Dis Sci. 1983 Nov;28(11):1025–1033. doi: 10.1007/BF01311732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wexner S. D., Daniel N., Jagelman D. G. Colectomy for constipation: physiologic investigation is the key to success. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991 Oct;34(10):851–856. doi: 10.1007/BF02049695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES