Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 2002 Sep 1;30(17):3870–3879. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf495

Mutations altering the cleavage specificity of a homing endonuclease

Lenny M Seligman a, Karen M Chisholm, Brett S Chevalier 1,2, Meggen S Chadsey 2, Samuel T Edwards, Jeremiah H Savage, Adeline L Veillet
PMCID: PMC137417  PMID: 12202772

Abstract

The homing endonuclease I-CreI recognizes and cleaves a particular 22 bp DNA sequence. The crystal structure of I-CreI bound to homing site DNA has previously been determined, leading to a number of predictions about specific protein–DNA contacts. We test these predictions by analyzing a set of endonuclease mutants and a complementary set of homing site mutants. We find evidence that all structurally predicted I-CreI/DNA contacts contribute to DNA recognition and show that these contacts differ greatly in terms of their relative importance. We also describe the isolation of a collection of altered specificity I-CreI derivatives. The in vitro DNA-binding and cleavage properties of two such endonucleases demonstrate that our genetic approach is effective in identifying homing endonucleases that recognize and cleave novel target sequences.

INTRODUCTION

Homing endonucleases are remarkable in their ability to function autonomously in recognizing and cleaving specific long DNA sequences. These enzymes are encoded by sequences found within self-splicing RNA introns or self-splicing protein introns (‘inteins’). Their target sequences (‘homing sites’) are 14–40 bp in length and are comprised of DNA sequences from each of the two intron flanks. Intact homing sites are thus present only in the ‘intronless’ alleles of their corresponding host genes. In nature, homing endonuclease-cleaved DNA can be repaired via homology-based double-strand break repair, resulting in unidirectional transfer of the homing endonuclease-containing intron, along with disruption of the homing site sequence. This mechanism allows for both same species and horizontal intron transfer events (1,2).

Homing endonucleases have been introduced into bacterial, plant, insect and mammalian cells where they have been shown to recognize and cleave their specific targets (38). Such homing endonuclease-induced DNA double-strand breaks may be lethal, mutagenic, or repaired by homologous recombination. The major limitation of this approach is that it depends on the prior introduction of homing endonuclease target sequences or on the fortuitous existence of host sequences compatible with particular homing endonucleases. The ability to engineer new homing endonucleases that target DNA sequences of interest could enable new gene replacement and inactivation strategies in a wide variety of organisms.

Homing endonucleases appear to have evolved independently on multiple occasions, as sequence comparisons reveal four distinct families of enzymes (9). The homing endonuclease I-CreI is a member of the largest family, the LAGLIDADG endonucleases (10,11). I-CreI is a 163 amino acid protein which functions as a homodimer, with the conserved LAGLIDADG domain forming the dimerization interface as well as contributing to the catalytic core (12). I-CreI is specified by sequences in a self-splicing intron in the 23S rRNA gene from the choloroplast genome of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (13). The structure of I-CreI bound to homing site DNA has been solved, providing valuable insight into the mechanism by which I-CreI achieves its high DNA target specificity (14,15).

The I-CreI homing site is a semi-palindromic 22 bp sequence, with 7 of 11 bp identical in each half-site (Fig. 1). Since I-CreI functions as a homodimer, it is not surprising that the majority of predicted protein–DNA contacts occur at these symmetrical positions (14). Of the nine amino acids predicted to directly contact DNA, seven are thought to interact with nucleotides at symmetrical positions. Of the seven symmetrical positions in each half-site, six are predicted to interact with one or more I-CreI amino acids.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Predicted I-CreI/DNA contacts. The 22 bp I-CreI homing site is shown, with palindromic base pairs in bold. Cleavage positions are indicated by vertical lines between bases 13 and 14 on the top strand and 9 and 10 on the bottom. I-CreI amino acids are indicated by their single letter abbreviations, with residues from one monomer of the homodimer in bold and those from the other having primes. Solid lines indicate direct hydrogen bond interactions, with double lines indicating two such interactions. Dashed lines indicate water-mediated interactions. The figure is based upon the structure of Jurica et al. (14).

We are interested in better defining the interactions involved in DNA recognition by I-CreI. We have constructed endonuclease mutants in which each of the nine amino acids predicted to directly contact homing site bases and a tenth amino acid predicted to participate in a water-mediated interaction are converted to alanines. We have also constructed a series of homing site mutants where palindromic positions have been systematically altered. Each of our mutants has been examined for function in vivo in a series of Escherichia coli-based assays. Our mutants display a wide range of phenotypes, from nearly wild-type to completely inactive. We have thus determined the relative importance of structurally predicted I-CreI/DNA contacts, defining which contacts are most important for this highly specific protein–DNA interaction.

In the course of these studies we determined that our collection of mutant homing sites included a number with decreased affinities for wild-type I-CreI. We have begun to systematically search for I-CreI derivatives that recognize these sites better than does the wild-type enzyme and report here on the isolation of a collection of such altered specificity mutants. Two such mutants have been purified and shown to display altered DNA recognition properties in vitro, demonstrating that our genetic approach is effective in identifying homing endonucleases that recognize and cleave novel target sequences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and media

The following E.coli K-12 strains were used in this study: CC118, [araD139 Δ(ara,leu)7697 Δ(lac)X74 phoAΔ20 galE galK thi rpE rpoB argE(am) recA1], CC136 [F128 (lacIq)/Δ(lac-pro) ara nalA argE(am) thi rpoB] and MC1000 [araD139 Δ(ara,leu)7697 Δ(lac)X74 galE galK thi rpsL]. Standard growth media were used (16). Where required, they were supplemented with kanamycin (50 µg/ml), ampicillin (200 µg/ml), chloramphenicol (30 µg/ml), tetracycline (10 µg/ml), X-Gal (40 µg/ml) or arabinose (0.2 or 0.04% w/v).

Plasmid constructs

Plasmid pBR-O-Xho is a tetracycline-resistant derivative of pBR322 (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) used for the construction of F′o-cre alleles. It contains 310 bp of lac operon DNA, beginning at the 3′ end of lacI and extending into the 5′ end of lacZ, with 25 bp of lacO sequence replaced by a XhoI cleavage site. It was created using overlap extension PCR (17) and cloned into the unique PvuI and EcoRI sites of pBR322. The wild-type and the symmetrically mutated homing site derivative of pBR-O-Xho were created by annealing appropriate complementary 26 base oligonucleotides and ligating into XhoI-cleaved pBR-O-Xho. All mutants were sequence verified by the DNA Sequencing Facility at Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Gardens (Claremont, CA).

I-CreI homing site-containing plasmid pKS155 and I-CreI endonuclease-encoding plasmid pA-E have been described previously (3). I-CreI alanine substitution mutants were generated by overlap extension PCR (17). The same procedure was used to create silent mutations specifying a unique SalI restriction site at I-CreI codons 17 and 18, and a unique HindIII restriction site at I-CreI codons 40 and 41. A cassette mutagenesis strategy utilizing these two restriction sites was employed to create all non-alanine substitutions at codons 32 and 33. All mutants were sequence verified. Standard recombinant DNA procedures were used for the isolation and restriction analysis of plasmid DNAs (18).

Bacterial manipulations

Reciprocal recombination was used to transfer the wild-type and symmetrically mutated homing sites from pBR-O-Xho to the F′ factor F128 (19) of E.coli strain CC136 to create F′o-cre alleles. This was done in two steps, by first selecting tetracycine-resistant co-integrates after a mating with MC1000 and then screening for tetracycine-sensitive F′ factors after a mating with CC118. F′o-cre alleles were then transferred back to MC1000 for phenotypic assays. After transfer to F′ factors, all mutant homing sites were amplified by PCR and sequence verified.

In vivo I-CreI assays

Fcre-kan assays. MC1000 cells containing F′cre-kan were made competent by CaCl2 treatment and transformed by pAE encoding wild-type and mutant derivatives of I-CreI. Trans formants were selected on media containing (i) chloramphenicol only; (ii) chloramphenicol and kanamycin; (iii) chloramphenicol and 0.2% arabinose; (iv) chloramphenicol, kanamycin and 0.2% arabinose. Under these conditions wild-type I-CreI expressed from pAE yielded healthy colonies on media supplemented with chloramphenicol only, tiny irregular colonies on media supplemented with chloramphenicol and 0.2% arabinose, and no colonies on either media containing kanamycin. Mutants that yielded colonies on all four types of media were classified as inactive. A subset of these mutants that displayed no evidence of toxicity on arabinose-containing media were classified as non-toxic. Mutants that failed to form colonies only on media containing chloramphenicol, kanamycin and 0.2% arabinose were classified as partially active. A number of mutants were extremely toxic in that they failed to form the expected numbers of colonies on media supplemented with chloramphenicol and 0.2% arabinose. These mutants were tested for activity on media supplemented with 0.04% arabinose.

Fo-cre assays. MC1000 cells containing F′o-cre were made competent by CaCl2 treatment and transformed by pAE encoding wild-type and mutant derivatives of I-CreI. Transformants were selected on media containing chloramphenicol and X-Gal. Photographs of sectored colonies were taken after colonies developed for 24–48 h at 37°C.

In vitro I-CreI assays

Binding assays. The I-CreI mutants S32K and Y33C were constructed in pI-CreI (20) using Stratagene’s Quikchange site-directed mutagenesis kit. The two mutants and the wild-type protein were overexpressed in E.coli BL21[DE3] and purified as previously described (21). Gel mobility shift assays were based on retardation of the electrophoretic mobility of 32P kinase-labeled DNA when bound by I-CreI (22,23). Appropriate 47 base oligonucleotides were annealed and end-labeled with 32P. Endonuclease and 2.5 fmol labeled double-stranded (ds)DNA was incubated for 30 min at room temperature in 20 mM Tris pH 9.0, 10 mM CaCl2, 1 mM DTT, 50 µg/ml non-specific competitor DNA and 3% glycerol (Mg2+ is required for I-CreI cleavage activity; substitution of Ca2+ for Mg2+ permits DNA binding but not cleavage). Samples were electrophoresed on 10% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels containing 1 mM CaCl2 at 200 V at 4°C. Gels were imaged in a Storm Phosphorimager 840 (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) and the intensity of the free and bound DNA bands were quantified using ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics). The Kd values of the I-CreI/DNA complexes were defined as the concentration of I-CreI at which 50% of the DNA was shifted into a complex with slower mobility (24) and represent averages of three independent assays.

Cleavage assays. The abilities of mutant I-CreI homing sites (present on pBR-O-Xho) to serve as substrates for purified I-CreI were determined as previously described (3), with one exception: prior to exposure to I-CreI, pBR-O-Xho derivatives containing mutant homing sites were linearized with NdeI. For site competition assays, pKS155 (containing a wild-type I-CreI homing site) was linearized with XmnI. Assays were performed on 100 ng of each linearized plasmid in 10 µl of 20 mM Tris pH 9.0, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT and 50 µg/ml BSA. Minimal enzyme amounts sufficient to achieve complete digestion of each substrate were determined empirically (see Fig. 5, 1× samples) and used to initiate a series of 2-fold dilutions. Reactions took place for 30 min at 37°C and were terminated by placing digestions on ice, followed by addition of loading buffer containing SDS (to 0.5% w/v) and electrophoresis through 1.2% agarose gels in 1× TBE buffer (18).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

In vitro cleavage competition assays. Wild-type I-CreI and endonuclease mutants C33 and K32 were exposed to linearized plasmids containing wild-type and mutant homing sites. The numbers above each gel indicate relative amounts of endonuclease, with 0 corresponding to no enzyme, 1 corresponding to the minimal enzyme concentration sufficient to completely digest each plasmid and subsequent fractions reflecting serial 2-fold enzyme dilutions. Homing site identities are indicated at the sides of each photo and endonuclease identities below.

RESULTS

We have used a series of E.coli-based genetic assays to analyze DNA recognition by I-CreI. Briefly, I-CreI was expressed from an arabinose-inducible promoter (25) on the pACYC184-based plasmid pA-E. Two F′ factor borne I-CreI homing site constructs were used as targets. The first target has the homing site located adjacent to a kanamycin resistance gene (the ‘F′cre-kan assay’, Fig. 2A). The second target has the homing site located in a lac operon in place of lacO sequences (the ‘F′o-cre assay’, Fig. 2B). In the absence of arabinose induction there was sufficient expression of wild-type I-CreI from pA-E to cleave each homing site, as evidenced by loss of kanamycin resistance in the first assay and conversion of cells from lacZ+ to lacZ in the second. Increased expression of I-CreI and I-CreI mutants can be toxic to E.coli, as evidenced by the presence of small translucent colonies or by a complete absence of colonies on media containing arabinose.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Escherichia coli-based assays for I-CreI function. (A) The F′cre-kan assay. Plasmid pA-E contains a chloramphenicol resistance gene and expresses I-CreI from an arabinose-inducible promoter. F′cre-kan contains a wild-type I-CreI homing site adjacent to a kanamycin resistance gene. Introduction of pA-E into F′cre-kan-containing cells results in recipient cells being converted from kanamycin-resistant to kanamycin-sensitive. (B) The F′o-cre assay. F′o-cre contains an I-CreI homing site in place of lacO sequences. Introduction of pA-E into F′o-cre-containing cells results in recipient cells being converted from lacZ+ to lacZ.

Partially active I-CreI mutants could be identified in each of the two assays. In the F′cre-kan assay such mutants eliminated kanamycin resistance only when expressed at high levels in the presence of arabinose (Table 1). In the F′o-cre assay partially active mutants gave rise to sectored colonies, with the degree of sectoring indicative of the amount of endonuclease activity (Table 1 and Fig. 3). Note that there was a small amount of spontaneous sectoring in control experiments (Fig. 3, endo), indicating that the F′ lac allele was slightly unstable. As this instability may be heightened by I-CreI-induced toxicity, all F′o-cre assays were carried out in the absence of arabinose induction.

Table 1. I-CreI mutant phenotypes.

Mutant class Substitution(s) F′cre-kan assaya F′o-cre assayb
  None (wild-type) ++ ++
Fully active S32A, T140A    
  Y33F    
       
Partially active N30A, Q44A, Q38A, Q44A/T140A + +
  S32K, S32R, Y33C, Y33Nc, Y33Rc    
       
Inactive Q26A, R68A, Y33Ac
  Y33G, Y33I, Y33K, Y33L, Y33P, Y33Q, Y33S, Y33T    
       
Non-toxic K28A, R70A
  Y33D, Y33E, Y33M, Y33V, Y33W    
Hypertoxic Y33Hc +d

a++ and + indicate elimination of kanamycin resistance without arabinose present or in the presence of arabinose, respectively. – indicates retention of kanamycin resistance in the presence of arabinose.

b++, + and – indicate white colonies, sectored colonies and blue colonies, respectively, on medium containing X-Gal.

cThese mutants failed to efficiently form colonies on 0.2% arabinose medium. Induction assays were conducted in the presence of 0.04% arabinose.

dColonies appeared ‘molted’. Sectoring may have been due to toxicity rather than homing site cleavage.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Cleavage of the wild-type I-CreI homing site by partially active I-CreI derivatives. The F′o-cre assay with recipients containing F′o-cre with wild-type I-CreI homing sites. The identities of endonucleases are indicated above each panel, with the ‘endo’ control corresponding to pACYC184.

Alanine substitutions

According to the I-CreI–DNA co-crystal structure, nine amino acids (Q26, K28, N30, S32, Y33, Q38, Q44, R68 and R70) make potentially important direct contacts with specific homing site bases, and a tenth (T140) participates in water-mediated hydrogen bonding (Fig. 1) (14). To determine the relative importance of these 10 residues in DNA recognition, alanine substitutions at these positions were constructed and examined in our E.coli-based assays. The resulting mutants fell into four distinct phenotypic classes (Table 1).

The first two classes of mutants retained the most I-CreI activity (Table 1). The ‘fully active’ mutants S32A and T140A behaved exactly like the wild-type in each of the assays: kanamycin resistance was lost in the absence of arabinose induction in the F′cre-kan assay, and cells became completely lacZ in the F′o-cre assay. Thus, the S32 and T140 contacts appear least important for homing site recognition. The ‘partially active’ mutants N30A, Q38A and Q44A displayed intermediate levels of activity in each assay. In the F′cre-kan assay each mutant required arabinose induction in order to eliminate kanamycin resistance. In the F′o-cre assay each gave rise to sectored colonies (Fig. 3), indicating that each of these mutants is somewhat active in the absence of induction.

Mutants in the remaining two classes failed to demonstrate homing site cleavage in either assay (Table 1). These mutants were distinguishable based upon their different responses to endonuclease induction. For mutants K28A and R70A, growth in the presence of 0.2% arabinose resulted in relatively healthy-looking colonies. These two mutants were classified as ‘non-toxic’. The remaining ‘inactive’ mutants (Q26A, Y33A and R68A), like the ‘fully active’ and ‘partially active’ classes of mutants described above, produced small translucent colonies when grown in the presence of 0.2% arabinose. Surprisingly, the Y33A mutant was even more toxic than wild-type I-CreI in that exposure to 0.2% arabinose resulted in significantly fewer colonies than expected. Due to this extreme toxicity, the Y33A mutant was assayed in the presence of 0.04% arabinose, where it failed to eliminate kanamycin resistance. The toxicity observed upon induction of I-CreI and most of the I-CreI derivatives described here may reflect direct interactions with E.coli chromosomal DNA (see Discussion).

Two of the mutants that displayed significant residual activity, T140A and Q44A, are altered at positions predicted to interact with the same homing site bases (positions 8/15, Fig. 1). In the F′o-cre assay the T140A mutant generated all completely white colonies, whereas the Q44A mutant produced highly sectored colonies (Fig. 3). It is possible that each of these mutants retains significant activity as a result of the remaining contacts between the other residue, either Q44 or T140, and the homing site bases at these positions. To test this idea, a mutant containing both the T140A and the Q44A mutations was examined (Table 1). In the F′o-cre assay this mutant produced colonies that were significantly less sectored than those produced by the Q44A mutant (Fig. 3), implying that the T140 contact does contribute to site recognition.

Position 33 substitutions

The tyrosine at I-CreI position 33 is among the most conserved residues between I-CreI and a group of closely related endonucleases (26). Having shown that an alanine substitution at this position significantly alters I-CreI activity, we decided to examine the consequences of other amino acid substitutions. A cassette mutagenesis strategy was used to generate each of the other 18 possible amino acid substitutions and the resulting I-CreI derivatives were examined for activity in our assays (Table 1).

One mutant (Y33F) behaved like wild-type I-CreI in each of our assays. This demonstrates that the hydroxyl group present on Y33 is not required for efficient homing site recognition. Three other mutants (Y33C, Y33N and Y33R) displayed intermediate levels of activity in each assay (Table 1 and Fig. 3 for Y33C). Of this latter group, Y33N and Y33R mutants were more toxic than wild-type I-CreI in that they failed to form any colonies on 0.2% arabinose-containing media. However, these mutants did grow on 0.04% arabinose media and eliminated kanamycin resistance in the F′cre-kan assay under these conditions.

The remaining substitutions at position 33 each displayed less affinity for the wild-type I-CreI site (Table 1). Eight mutants (Y33G, Y33I, Y33K, Y33L, Y33P, Y33Q, Y33S and Y33T) failed to demonstrate homing site cleavage in either assay but did retain significant toxicity in the presence of arabinose. Five other mutants (Y33D, Y33E, Y33M, Y33V and Y33W) failed to display either homing site cleavage or toxicity.

The final mutant (Y33H) displayed an interesting combination of phenotypes. Like the Y33N and Y33R mutants, Y33H yielded sectored colonies in the F′o-cre assay and failed to yield colonies in the presence of 0.2% arabinose (Table 1). However, unlike the other two mutants, Y33H retained kanamycin resistance when grown on 0.04% arabinose media. This is the only mutant analyzed with seemingly contradictory behavior in our two assays. It is interesting that even in the absence of arabinose induction Y33H-containing colonies displayed irregular morphologies, indicative of toxicity (Fig. 3). It may be that this ‘hypertoxic’ phenotype is responsible for the sectoring observed in the F′o-cre assay.

Symmetrical homing site mutants

Site recognition by I-CreI can be disrupted either by mutations that alter I-CreI (see above) or by mutations that alter the DNA substrate. We have examined a series of mutations altering the seven symmetrical positions in the I-CreI homing site. To ensure that each monomer in an I-CreI homodimer is presented with the same potential contacts, we have restricted the present analysis to symmetrical mutations, where each member of a symmetrical pair is altered in the same fashion. For example, a mutant site with the 5′ nucleotide on the top strand having a C→T transition would contain the same mutation on the bottom strand. Thus, for each of the seven symmetrical positions in the I-CreI homing site (Fig. 1), three such mutations are possible. Each of these 21 homing site mutations have been made, transferred into our F′o-cre assay system and examined for the ability to serve as substrates for cleavage by wild-type I-CreI.

Fifteen of the 21 mutant homing sites were completely resistant to cleavage by I-CreI in our in vivo assays (Table 2). These 15 mutants correspond to all possible combinations at five of the seven symmetrical homing site positions (Fig. 1, positions 2/21, 3/20, 7/16, 8/15 and 9/14). Thus, five of the seven symmetrical positions in each half-site appear to be essential for efficient site recognition in vivo.

Table 2. Symmetrical homing site mutants.

I-CreI sensitivitya Substitutionsb
Fully sensitive T1 A22
  T4 A19
   
Partially sensitive A1 T22, G1 C22
  C4 G19, G4 C19
   
Resistant C2 G21, G2 C21, T2 A21
  C3 G20, G3 C20, T3 A20
  A7 T16, C7 G16, T7 A16
  A8 T15, C8 G15, G8 C15
  A9 T14, G9 C14, T9 A14

aFully sensitive, partially sensitive and resistant indicate white colonies, sectored colonies and blue colonies, respectively, in the F′o-cre assay.

bSymmetrical substitutions are indicated 5′→3′. Numbers correspond to Figure 1.

Mutants altered at the remaining two positions (Fig. 1, positions 1/22 and 4/19) displayed varying degrees of I-CreI sensitivity. For each position, one of three mutant homing sites acts as an excellent substrate for I-CreI, as evidenced by completely white colonies in the F′o-cre assay (Table 2). The other two mutant sites at each position display sectored colonies upon exposure to wild-type I-CreI (Fig. 4, first row). The degree of sectoring differs for these four mutant sites, with site G4 C19 containing the most lacZ cells per colony and site G1 C22 the least (Fig. 4). Presumably, the relative number of lacZ cells per colony is directly proportional to the ability of a mutant site to be cleaved by I-CreI. The fact that mutants altered at positions 1/22 and 4/19 are cleaved more efficiently than mutants altered at the other five symmetrical positions fits nicely with the structural data and with our endonuclease mutant data. The outermost position (1/22) is predicted to interact with S32, which when changed to an alanine behaved exactly like the wild-type (see above). The other position (4/19) is the lone symmetrical position without any predicted endonuclease contacts (Fig. 1) (14).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Cleavage of mutant homing sites by various I-CreI derivatives. The F′o-cre assay with recipients containing F′o-cre with symmetrical mutant homing sites, as indicated above each set of panels. The identities of endonucleases are indicated next to each set of panels.

Each of the 21 symmetrical mutant homing sites was also examined for cleavage by I-CreI in vitro (data not shown). Nineteen of the 21 sites displayed partial to complete cleavage. Only two sites (A9 T14 and G9 C14) were completely I-CreI resistant. Thus, 13 of the 15 symmetrical mutant sites that were resistant to I-CreI cleavage in vivo were sensitive in vitro. These results are consistent with previous work, where eight of nine other mutant homing sites selected as being I-CreI-resistant in vivo were sensitive in vitro (3).

S32 and T140 contribute to DNA recognition

The phenotypes of the S32A and T140A mutants were indistinguishable from that of wild-type I-CreI in each of our assays (Table 1). This could indicate that S32 and T140 are not involved in DNA recognition or that contributions made by these residues are too subtle to be detected by these assays. If the latter is true, then mutant homing sites that are inefficiently cleaved by wild-type I-CreI may display a heightened requirement for the presence of these contacts. To test this prediction, the S32A and T140A mutants were examined for the ability to cleave the four mutant homing sites that resulted in sectored colonies when exposed to wild-type I-CreI. The results of these assays are presented in Figure 4.

The T140A mutant appeared to be significantly less efficient than wild-type I-CreI at cleaving the four mutant homing sites, as evidenced by a greater proportion of lacZ+ cells per colony (Fig. 4, compare rows one and three). The S32A mutant also displayed a significantly greater proportion of lacZ+ cells per colony than wild-type with the C4 G19 and G4 C19 mutant homing sites. Interestingly, the difference between wild-type I-CreI and S32A was much more subtle with the A1 T22 and G1 C22 mutant homing sites. This makes sense given that S32 is predicted to contact the two outermost positions which are altered in these mutants. Thus, contacts at these positions are predicted to be lost for both the wild-type endonuclease and the S32A mutant. Taken together, these data imply that the S32 and T140 contacts do in fact contribute to homing site recognition.

I-CreI derivatives with novel cleavage specificities

Altered specificity derivatives of I-CreI would be expected to involve a combination of existing and new protein–DNA contacts (Fig. 1). The I-CreI-resistant mutant homing sites described above provide us with the opportunity to screen for such new contacts. As each of these mutant sites differs from the wild-type homing site in a symmetrical fashion, any new contacts present in one monomer of an I-CreI dimer would be present in the other as well. Since we know which I-CreI amino acid(s) is predicted to interact at a particular homing site position, it is possible to alter specific contact residues and determine whether resulting mutants have increased affinity for corresponding homing site mutants in the F′o-cre assay.

The above strategy was used to study the interaction between I-CreI position 33 and homing site bases 2 and 21. Each of the 19 I-CreI derivatives altered at position 33 was examined for activity in the F′o-cre assay against the three mutant homing sites altered at these bases. Mutants with increased affinities were found for two of the three mutant homing sites (Table 3). The G2 C21 homing site was efficiently cleaved by mutants containing arginine or histidine at position 33, as evidenced by completely white colonies. Similarly, white colonies resulted when the T2 A21 homing site was assayed against an I-CreI derivative containing cysteine at position 33. This latter mutant homing site also resulted in sectored colonies when tested against I-CreI derivatives with leucine, serine or threonine at position 33. The C2 G21 homing site was not efficiently cleaved by any derivative. It is worth noting that each of the I-CreI derivatives that displayed an increased affinity for a mutant homing site also displayed a decreased affinity for the wild-type homing site (Table 1 and Fig. 3).

Table 3. Altered specificity I-CreI derivatives.

Mutant homing sitea I-CreI sensitivityb Altered specificity I-CreI derivativesb
G2 C21 Y33H (++), Y33R (++)
T2 A21 Y33C (++), Y33L (+), Y33S (+), Y33T (+)
C2 G21 None
G1 C22 + S32K (+), S32R (+)c

aSymmetrical substitutions are indicated 5′→3′. Numbers correspond to Figure 1.

b++, + and – indicate white colonies, sectored colonies and blue colonies, respectively, in the F′o-cre assay.

cThe proportion of white cells per sectored G1 C22 colony is far greater for S32K and S32R than for wild-type I-CreI (see Fig. 4).

We have begun a similar analysis of the interaction between homing site bases 1 and 22 and I-CreI amino acid 32. I-CreI derivatives containing arginine and lysine at position 32 have been created and examined in our assays (Table 1). Each cleaves the G1 C22 homing site better than does wild-type I-CreI, as evidenced by a greater proportion of lacZ cells per colony (Table 3). When tested against the wild-type homing site and the A1 T22 homing site, each displayed a greater proportion of lacZ+ cells per colony than did wild-type I-CreI, indicating a lower affinity for these two homing sites (see S32K, Figs 3 and 4). Interestingly, the T1 A22 homing site is efficiently cleaved by wild-type I-CreI as well as by the S32K and S32R mutants, as all colonies are completely white in each case.

Protein was isolated from mutants Y33C and S32K and examined in vitro. To examine DNA cleavage, the endonucleases were exposed to two linear plasmid substrates, one with the wild-type homing site and one with a mutant homing site. Wild-type I-CreI demonstrated a clear preference for the wild-type homing site over the T2 A21 site over a wide range of endonuclease concentrations (Fig. 5, top left; note the differences in substrate cleavage in lanes 1/2, 1/4 and 1/8, as well as the differences in product appearance in the remaining lanes). The C33 endonuclease displayed a reciprocal pattern, indicating a strong preference for the mutant homing site (Fig. 5, bottom left). DNA binding studies performed on oligonucleotide substrates confirmed that wild-type I-CreI and the C33 endonuclease each have greater affinities for their respective target sites (Table 4). Most importantly, the C33 endonuclease displayed a 12-fold lower Kd for the T2 A21 site than wild-type I-CreI, demonstrating a significantly enhanced ability to bind this mutant site.

Table 4. In vitro binding assays.

Homing sitea Endonuclease Kdb (nM)
T2 A21 C33 47 ± 3
  Wild-type 563 ± 19
G1 C22 K32 44 ± 3
  Wild-type 50 ± 2
Wild-type Wild-type 7 ± 1
  C33 508 ± 21
  K32 50 ± 2

aSymmetrical substitutions are indicated 5′→3′. Numbers correspond to Figure 1.

bKd values determined in gel retardation assays on oligonucleotide substrates (see Materials and Methods).

Wild-type I-CreI also demonstrated a clear preference for the wild-type homing site over the G1 C22 site (Fig. 5, top right). However, this preference was less dramatic than that over the T2 A21 site in that differences were apparent over a narrower range of endonuclease concentrations. The K32 endonuclease displayed no site preference in that both mutant and wild-type substrates were cleaved with similar efficiencies (Fig. 5, bottom right). Kd measurements confirmed these observations, with wild-type I-CreI displaying a 7-fold lower Kd for the wild-type homing site and the K32 endonuclease displaying virtually identical Kd values for each site (Table 4).

DISCUSSION

Determinants of DNA recognition by I-CreI

A great deal of structural data on homing endonucleases has become available in the past few years (12,14,15,2731). Such studies provide important clues as to how these enzymes function to recognize and cleave specific long DNA sequences. However, there are limitations as to what can be concluded from crystallographic studies alone. For example, although the structure of I-CreI bound to homing site DNA reveals which endonuclease amino acids may be sharing hydrogen bonds with homing site bases, the structure reveals little information about the relative importance of these putative hydrogen bonds. Genetic studies can directly address such functional questions.

The majority of genetic work on homing endonucleases has involved examining the DNA-binding and cleavage properties of purified mutant proteins (3234). While valuable insights have been obtained from this approach, it may be problematic to extrapolate in vivo DNA recognition behavior from such in vitro studies. For example, I-CreI has been shown to cleave variant homing sites with up to 10 substitutions in vitro, implying that many positions are non-essential (3,35,36). However, we have identified a large collection of 1 and 2 bp homing site substitutions that are I-CreI-resistant in our E.coli-based assay systems (3; this work). As many of these mutant sites are efficiently cleaved in vitro, it is clear that our in vivo assays are much more sensitive to relatively small mutational changes. Such in vivo assays more closely mimic the natural situation where homing endonucleases must find and cleave particular DNA sequences in complex genomes.

We have previously described the F′cre-kan assay and used it to isolate loss of function endonuclease and homing site mutants (3). Here we have described a second E.coli-based assay and shown that the results from it correlate quite well with those from the previous assay (Table 1). The primary advantage of the F′o-cre assay (Fig. 2B) is that it is capable of identifying both gain and loss of function mutants in a single step. The assay also reveals mutants with intermediate phenotypes in that such mutants yield sectored colonies. We interpret such colonies as resulting from the cleavage of some, though not all, target sites in the initially transformed cell. Subsequent segregation of cleaved from intact F′ factors, and later cleavage and segregation events in the course of colony growth, would produce the observed sectored colonies. An essentially identical explanation has been proposed to explain mixed colonies resulting from cleavage of an E.coli chromosomal site by the homing endonuclease I-SceI (5).

To examine DNA recognition by I-CreI we have systematically altered the I-CreI amino acids predicted to make specific DNA contacts, generated as a set of corresponding homing site mutants, and examined the functional consequences of these mutations in our E.coli-based assays. We find evidence that all structurally predicted I-CreI–DNA contacts do contribute to recognition, although they differ greatly in their relative importance.

Endonuclease mutants. Two I-CreI amino acids (S32 and T140) appear to be relatively unimportant for DNA recognition. Mutants with alanine substitutions at these positions were virtually indistinguishable from wild-type I-CreI in our assay systems. When three other amino acids (N30, Q38 and Q44) were converted to alanines the resulting mutants retained significant I-CreI function. It is interesting that, with the exception of S32, each of these five residues interacts with a homing site position predicted to contact two amino acids (Fig. 1). The Q44A/T140A double mutant, altered at two residues predicted to contact the same base pair, was significantly more defective than was either single mutant, consistent with the notion that each of these amino acids contributes to DNA recognition.

Mutants with alanine substitutions at the other five positions displayed less affinity for the wild-type homing site, indicating that each of these native contacts is more important for site recognition. Two mutants in this group alter residues (R68 and R70) predicted from the I-CreI/DNA co-crystal structure to each make two base-specific contacts in each half-site (Fig. 1) (14). Two other residues in this group (Q26 and K28) are the only amino acids predicted to make contacts with non-palindromic homing site bases (Fig. 1). It is interesting that these base contacts that differ in each DNA half-site are among the most important in the I-CreI/DNA complex.

Our analysis of all possible amino acid substitutions at I-CreI position 33 has identified phenylalanine as the only amino acid capable of functioning as well as the native tyrosine when tested against the wild-type homing site. The ability of phenylalanine to substitute for tyrosine is surprising, given that the hydroxyl group of tyrosine was predicted to share either one (14) or two (26) hydrogen bonds with adenine bases present at homing site positions 2 and 21. Three other substitutions at position 33 (cysteine, asparagine and arginine) retained some affinity for the wild-type homing site, while the remaining 15 did not.

Homing site mutants. The phenotypes of our homing site mutants are consistent with the above endonuclease mutant data. Of the seven palindromic positions within the homing site, five appear to be essential for efficient site recognition (Fig. 1, positions 2/21, 3/20, 7/16, 8/15 and 9/14). All mutants altered at these positions are resistant to cleavage by wild-type I-CreI in vivo.

The remaining two palindromic positions appear to be less essential, as mutants altered at these positions are either completely or partially I-CreI sensitive in vivo. One of these positions (4/19) is the only symmetrical position without any predicted endonuclease contacts based upon the I-CreI/DNA co-crystal structure (Fig. 1) (14). The other position (1/22) is predicted to interact with S32, shown above to be among the least important of all contact residues examined.

The four mutant homing sites that yielded highly sectored colonies upon exposure to wild-type I-CreI provided a sensitive means for examining endonuclease mutants with subtle phenotypes. As both T140A and S32A mutants were less efficient at cleaving these sites than was wild-type I-CreI (Fig. 4), we conclude that both T140 and S32 contribute to homing site recognition. For T140, this result is consistent with the behavior of a Q44A/T140A double mutant, where a role for T140 was also implied.

Toxicity to E.coli

One caveat of protein genetics is that inactivating mutations may induce gross structural aberrations in protein structure. We do not believe this to be a major problem in these studies since 24 of 31 endonuclease mutants analyzed displayed significant residual activity, toxicity or both (Table 1). Of the seven mutants that displayed no apparent toxicity, four are predicted to display decreased positive electropotentials on or near their DNA-binding surfaces, either due to loss of a positive charge (K28A and R70A) or addition of a negative one (Y33D and Y33E). Two extremely toxic mutants (Y33H and Y33R) are predicted to add an extra positive charge to the protein DNA-binding surface. As a strong positive electropotential has been postulated to play a role in DNA binding (12), it could be that a significant portion of I-CreI toxicity to E.coli results from electrostatically driven protein–DNA interactions.

There may be a second, sequence-specific component to I-CreI toxicity. The wild-type I-CreI homing site is a 22 bp sequence located in a highly conserved region of the C.reinhardtii chloroplast 23S rRNA gene. The corresponding sequence in the E.coli 23S gene, present seven times per genome, differs by only 3 bp (37). Of particular interest is an alteration at position 21 (Fig. 1), which replaces an adenine with a guanine across from I-CreI amino acid 33. As mutants Y33H and Y33R have each been shown to specifically cleave the symmetrical mutant homing site containing guanines at this position in each half-site, it could be that each of these mutants interacts with the E.coli 23S site better than does wild-type I-CreI. The basis for the extreme toxicity displayed by mutants Y33A and Y33N is less clear, but may involve loss of an unfavorable interaction between the tyrosine at position 33 in wild-type I-CreI and the guanine present at position 21 in the E.coli 23S gene. If I-CreI-mediated cleavage of the E.coli 23S genes is in fact responsible for the observed toxicity, this may serve as a model for homing endonuclease derivatives engineered for use as highly specific antimicrobial agents.

Altered specificity I-CreI derivatives

With their ability to function autonomously in recognizing and cleaving specific long DNA sequences, homing endonucleases have been mentioned as ideal reagents for the manipulation of complex genomes (9,38,39). Such manipulations include gene mapping, cloning, and studying the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Of particular interest are studies in mammalian cells showing that the repair of homing endonuclease-generated double-strand breaks can be mutagenic (6) and can stimulate gene targeting reactions (4). The ability to alter the target specificities of existing homing endonucleases would expand the utility of such approaches. For example, ‘designer’ homing endonucleases could be used as gene therapy reagents to specifically target particular common disease-causing alleles. The great deal of structural information available for I-CreI (12,14,15), as well as the ability to genetically manipulate I-CreI and its homing site (3; this work), make it an ideal candidate for studies aimed at isolating such altered specificity derivatives.

The E.coli-based assays we have developed provide a sensitive means for identifying I-CreI derivatives with altered cleavage specificities. Here, we have taken a systematic approach in examining the interaction between a single I-CreI amino acid (Y33) and its cognate homing site base. I-CreI derivatives with each of the possible 19 amino acids at position 33 were tested against homing sites containing each of the four possible bases symmetrically distributed at target site bases 2 and 21. I-CreI derivatives with increased affinities were identified for two of three possible symmetrical base substitutions at this homing site position (Table 3).

When the adenines present at homing site bases 2 and 21 were converted to guanines, the resulting site was efficiently cleaved only by I-CreI derivatives with histidine or arginine present at amino acid 33. Interestingly, homing site recognition by wild-type I-CreI is predicted to involve two arginine residues (R68 and R70) interacting with guanine bases in each half-site (Fig. 1) (14). The presence of the basic residue lysine at position 33 did not result in cleavage of this mutant site.

When the adenines present at homing site bases 2 and 21 were converted to thymines, the resulting site was efficiently cleaved only by an I-CreI derivative with cysteine present at amino acid 33. The strong preference of the C33 endonuclease for this mutant homing site was confirmed in vitro (Fig. 5 and Table 4). I-CreI derivatives with leucine, serine or threonine present at amino acid 33 each displayed some affinity for this mutant site. As leucine differs greatly from the other three amino acid side chains in its chemical properties, it is hard to imagine each of these I-CreI derivatives making novel contacts with the thymine bases in this mutant homing site. However, all four side chains are of similar size, which may be important in how these I-CreI derivatives interact with this DNA sequence.

Preliminary studies on another contact, that between S32 and the outermost homing site bases, have identified two interesting mutants (S32R and S32K). In vivo these mutants interacted better with the G1 C22 site than did wild-type I-CreI (Table 3 and Fig. 4). Each also interacted less well with the native homing site than did the wild-type enzyme (Table 1 and Fig. 3). In vitro the K32 endonuclease displayed a slightly lower Kd for the G1 C22 site than for the native site (Table 4). Comparing Kd values for wild-type I-CreI on the two mutant homing sites tested supports the idea that the contacts at bases 1 and 22 are significantly less important for homing site recognition than those at bases 2 and 21 (Table 4).

Theoretically, derivatives with increased affinities for non-native sequences could be altered specificity or relaxed specificity mutants. Altered specificity mutants are those which display an increased affinity for a mutant homing site and a decreased affinity for the native I-CreI homing site. The position 33 substitutions clearly fall into this class, as demonstrated in vitro with the C33 endonuclease. Relaxed specificity mutants would be predicted to display similar affinities for both native and mutant sites. The K32 endonuclease appears to fall into this category. Relaxed specificity derivatives may be ideal for in vitro applications in that they could recognize and cleave sequences of complexity intermediate to those cleaved by native homing endonucleases and type II restriction endonucleases.

For three of four mutant homing sites examined, I-CreI derivatives with increased affinities have been identified. If the results of the present work are representative, a systematic search of the remaining I-CreI DNA contacts should reveal a large number of novel contacts. Appropriate amino acid substitutions can then be combined to generate I-CreI derivatives that are specific for DNA sequences containing the appropriate cognate bases. Given the close proximity of many of the I-CreI contact residues to each other, it seems likely that there will be some constraints upon which amino acid substitutions can be used in combination. For example, introducing multiple basic residues in close proximity to each other may inhibit enzyme function. Only by first identifying novel contacts and then testing them in combination will we know the full range of DNA sequences accessible to I-CreI derivatives.

Many homing endonucleases of the LAGLIDADG family contain both DNA-binding domains within a single polypeptide (11,27,29,30). Such enzymes are free to interact with non-palindromic DNA sequences, as each DNA-binding region can specify a different range of contacts. Having a collection of I-CreI derivatives that recognize and cleave different symmetrical DNA sequences, it should be possible to mix and match ‘monomers’ with different recognition properties to create ‘dimers’ that target novel asymmetric DNA sequences. In fact, a chimeric LAGLIDADG endonuclease containing domains from both I-CreI and I-DmoI has already been made and shown to bind and cleave a hybrid target site (B.S.Chevalier, T.Kortemme, M.S.Chadsey, D.Baker, R.J.Monnat Jr and B.L.Stoddard, submitted for publication). We are currently attempting to create analogous active chimeras from divergent I-CreI subunits, using the altered specificity derivatives isolated thus far.

Acknowledgments

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Alexis Kaushansky, Cheryl Okumura and Saul Rosenstein for experimental contributions and Colin Manoil for valuable comments on the manuscript. Special thanks are due to Ray Monnat and Barry Stoddard for numerous contributions, both material and intellectual. This work was supported by a grant to L.M.S. from the NSF (RUI-9870817). K.M.C. was also supported by a grant to Pomona College from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. M.S.C. and B.S.C. were supported by NCI grant CA88942 and by a Molecular Training Grant in Cancer Research (T32 CA 09437, to M.S.C.) and an Interdisciplinary Training Grant in Cancer Research (T32 CA80416, to B.S.C).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Belfort M., Reaban,M.E., Coetzee,T. and Dalgaard,J.Z. (1995) Prokaryotic introns and inteins: a panoply of form and function. J. Bacteriol., 177, 3897–3903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chevalier B.S. and Stoddard,B.L. (2001) Homing endonucleases: structural and functional insight into the catalysts of intron/intein mobility. Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 3757–3774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Seligman L.M., Stephens,K.M., Savage,J.H. and Monnat,R.J.,Jr (1997) Genetic analysis of the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii I-Cre I mobile intron homing system in Escherichia coli. Genetics, 147, 1653–1664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Donoho G., Jasin,M. and Berg,P. (1998) Analysis of gene targeting and intrachromosomal homologous recombination stimulated by genomic double-strand breaks in mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell. Biol., 18, 4070–4078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Posfai G., Kolisnychenko,V., Bereczki,Z. and Blattner,F.R. (1999) Markerless gene replacement in Escherichia coli stimulated by a double-strand break in the chromosome. Nucleic Acids Res., 27, 4409–4415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Monnat R.J. Jr, Hackman,A.F. and Cantrell,M.A. (1999) Generation of highly site-specific DNA double-strand breaks in human cells by the homing endonucleases I-PpoI and I-CreI. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 255, 88–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kirik A., Salomon,S. and Puchta,H. (2000) Species-specific double-strand break repair and genome evolution in plants. EMBO J., 19, 5562–5566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rong Y.S. and Golic,K.G. (2000) Gene targeting by homologous recombination in Drosophila.Science, 288, 2013–2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Belfort M. and Roberts,R.J. (1997) Homing endonucleases: keeping the house in order. Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 3379–3388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Turmel M., Otis,C., Cote,V.T. and Lemieux,C. (1997) Evolutionary conserved and functionally important residues in the I-Ceu I homing endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 2610–2619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Daalgard J.Z., Klar,A.J., Moser,M.J., Holley,W.R., Chatterjee,A. and Mian,I.S. (1997) Statistical modeling and analysis of the LAGLIDADG familty of site-specific endonucleases and identification of an intein that encodes a site-specific endonuclease of the HNH family. Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 4626–4638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Heath P.J., Stephens,K.M., Monnat,R.J.,Jr and Stoddard,B.L. (1997) The structure of I-Cre I, a group I intron-encoded homing endonuclease. Nature Struct. Biol., 4, 468–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rochaix J.D., Rahire,M. and Michel,F. (1985) The chloroplast ribosomal intron of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii codes for a polypeptide related to mitochondrial maturases. Nucleic Acids Res., 13, 975–984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jurica M.S., Monnat,R.J.,Jr and Stoddard,B.L. (1998) DNA recognition and cleavage by the LAGLIDADG homing endonuclease I-Cre I. Mol. Cell, 2, 469–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chevalier B.S., Monnat,R.J.,Jr and Stoddard,B.L. (2001) The homing endonuclease I-CreI uses three metals, one of which is shared between the two active sites. Nature Struct. Biol., 8, 312–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Miller J.H. (1992) A Short Course in Bacterial Genetics: A Laboratory Manual and Handbook for Escherichia coli and Related Bacteria, 1st Edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  • 17.Vilejo A.N., Pogulis,R.J. and Pease,L.R. (1995) Mutagenesis and synthesis of novel recombinant genes using PCR. In Dieffenbach,C.W. and Dveksler,G.S. (eds), PCR Primer: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  • 18.Sambrook J.D., Fritsch,E.F. and Maniatis,T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  • 19.Holloway B. and Low,K.B. (1996) F-prime and R-prime factors. In Neidhardt,F.C., Ingraham,J.L., Low,K.B., Magasanik,B., Schaechter,M. and Umbarger,H.E. (eds), Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology, 2nd Edn. ASM Press, Washington, DC, pp. 2413–2420.
  • 20.Wang J., Hyong-Ha,K., Yuan,X. and Herrin,D. (1997) Purification, biochemical characterization and protein–DNA interactions of the I-CreI endonuclease produced in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 3767–3776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stephens K.M., Monnat,R.J.,Jr, Heath,P.J. and Stoddard,B.L. (1997) Crystallization and preliminary X-ray studies of I-CreI: a group I intron-encoded endonuclease from C. reinhardtii. Proteins, 28, 137–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fried M. and Crothers,D.M. (1981) Equilibria and kinetics of lac repressor–operator interations by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res., 9, 6505–6525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Garner M.M. and Revzin,A. (1981) A gel electrophoresis method for quantifying the binding of proteins to specific DNA regions: application to components of Escherichia coli lactose regulatory system. Nucleic Acids Res., 9, 3047–3060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ausubel F.M., Thomas,P.J., Mills,A., Moss,D.S. and Palmer,R.A. (1989) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Wiley, New York, NY.
  • 25.Guzman L., Belin,D., Carlson,M.J. and Beckwith,J. (1995) Tight regulation, modulation and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter. J. Bacteriol., 177, 4121–4130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lucas P., Otis,C., Mercier,J.P., Turmel,M. and Lemieux,C. (2001) Rapid evolution of the DNA-binding site in LAGLIDADG homing endonucleases. Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 960–969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Duan X., Gimble,F.S. and Quiocho,F.A. (1997) Crystal structure of PI-Sce I, a homing endonuclease with protein splicing activity. Cell, 89, 555–564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Flick K.E., Jurica,M.S., Monnat,R.J.,Jr and Stoddard,B.L. (1998) DNA binding and cleavage by the nuclear intron-encoded homing endonuclease I-PpoI. Nature, 394, 96–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Silva G.H., Dalgaard,J.Z., Belfort,M. and Van Roey,P. (1999) Crystal structure of the thermostable archael intron-encoded endonuclease I-DmoI. J. Mol. Biol., 286, 1123–1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ichiyanagi K., Ishino,Y., Ariyoshi,M., Komori,K. and Morikawa,K. (2000) Crystal structure of an archaeal intein-encoded homing endonuclease PI-PfuI. J. Mol. Biol., 300, 889–901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Van Roey P., Waddling,C.A., Fox,K.M., Belfort,M. and Derbyshire,V. (2001) Intertwined structure of the DNA-binding domain of intron endonuclease I-TevI with its substrate. EMBO J., 20, 3631–3637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hu D., Crist,M., Duan,X. and Gimble,F.S. (1999) Mapping of a DNA binding region of the PI-SceI homing endonuclease by affinity cleavage and alanine-scanning mutagenesis. Biochemistry, 38, 12621–12628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Komori K., Fujita,N., Ichiyanagi,K., Shinagawa,H., Morikawa,K. and Ishino,Y. (1999) PI-PfuI and PI-PfuII, intein-coded homing endonucleases from Pyrococcus furiosus. I. Purification and identification of the homing-type endonuclease activities. Nucleic Acids Res., 27, 4167–4174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schottler S., Wende,W., Pingoud,V. and Pingoud,A. (2000) Identification of Asp218 and Asp326 as the principal Mg2+ binding ligands of the homing endonuclease PI-SceI. Biochemistry, 39, 15895–15900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Durrenberger F. and Rochaix,J.D. (1993) Characterization of the cleavage site and the recognition sequence of the I-Cre I DNA endonuclease encoded by the chloroplast ribosomal intron of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Mol. Gen. Genet., 236, 409–414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Argast G.M., Stephens,K.M., Emond,M.J. and Monnat,R.J.,Jr (1998) I-Ppo I and I-Cre I homing site sequence degeneracy determined by random mutagenesis and sequential in vitro enrichment. J. Mol. Biol., 280, 345–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Blattner F.R., Plunkett,G.,III, Bloch,C.A., Perna,N.T., Burland,V., Riley,M., Collado-Vides,J., Glasner,J.D., Rode,C.K., Mayhew,G.F. et al. (1997) The complete sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science, 277, 1453–1474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jasin M. (1996) Genetic manipulation of genomes with rare-cutting endonucleases. Trends Genet., 12, 224–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stewart F.J. (1999) Homing endonucleases: applications for these rare cutters. NEB Transcript, 10, 5. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES