Skip to main content
Lippincott Open Access logoLink to Lippincott Open Access
. 2026 Oct 7;50(12):e48–e64. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002624

The 2026 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone

6th Edition

Jason L Hornick *,✉, Judith VMG Bovee †,‡, Cristina R Antonescu §, Daniel Baumhoer ∥, David Creytens ¶,#,**,††, Angelo P Dei Tos ‡‡, Cyril Fisher §§, Andrew L Folpe ∥∥, Meera Hameed §, Alexander J Lazar ¶¶, Markku Miettinen ##, G Petur Nielsen ***, Yoshinao Oda †††, Nasir Ud Din ‡‡‡, Jian Wang §§§, Akihiko Yoshida ∥∥∥, Jean-Yves Blay ¶¶¶, Johan L Bloem ###, Alessandro Gronchi ****, Fredrik Mertens ††††, Christina Messiou ‡‡‡‡, Jennelle C Hodge §§§§, Joseph D Khoury ∥∥∥∥, Andrew Field ¶¶¶¶, Bharat Rekhi ####, Harshima Wijesinghe *****, Pavitratha Puspanathan *****, Fikret Dirilenoglu *****, Christine Giesen *****, Blanca I Indave Ruiz *****, Dilani Lokuhetty *****; WCT Standing Editorial Board
PMCID: PMC13742349  PMID: 42839882

Abstract

The 6th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumors (STB6) integrates the latest scientific and molecular discoveries with decades of pathological expertise to establish a globally accepted common language for diagnosis and clinical behavior. In this volume, the “essential” and “desirable” diagnostic criteria have been refined, considering different resource settings, ensuring accuracy while maintaining flexibility. A tumor type (entity) is a tumor in which multiple parameters (eg, clinical, histopathological, and/or genetic features) differ from those of other tumor types. In total, 19 new entities met these criteria and were added. A subtype is different in at least one dimension from the main tumor type (clinical, histopathological, or genetic), preferably resulting in a different treatment or outcome. A morphological pattern (no longer “variant”) is important for pathologists to be aware of to facilitate recognition but is not associated with different clinical behavior. The classification was drafted by 203 editors and authors from 27 countries, representing genetics, medical oncology, surgical oncology, orthopedic surgery, and radiology, in addition to pathology. STB6 includes soft tissue tumors (n=116), bone tumors (n=46), vascular tumors of soft tissue and bone (n=18), undifferentiated spindle and round cell sarcomas (n=4), hematopoietic and dendritic cell neoplasms (n=6), and genetic syndromes (n=6). In total, 62 sarcomas are included. A consensus was reached among the expert editorial board. In this review, we highlight changes in tumor classification in STB6, including recently described tumor types, novel diagnostic markers, recent discoveries in molecular genetics, and improvements in prognostication.

Key Words: WHO classification of tumors, soft tissue and bone tumor classification, 6th edition, sarcoma, bone tumor, soft tissue tumor


The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of Tumors (WCT) provides a uniform nomenclature and standardized framework for categorizing tumors of soft tissue and bone, facilitating accurate diagnosis, guiding treatment, informing research, epidemiological reporting, and the development of international reporting and treatment guidelines. The 6th edition of the WHO Classification of soft tissue and bone tumors (STB6) is an update of the 5th edition classification, encompassing some major and minor changes. The 6th edition integrates the latest scientific and molecular discoveries with decades of pathological expertise to establish a globally accepted common language for soft tissue and bone tumor diagnosis and management. The criteria used for considering inclusion of new entities into this volume included publication of at least 5 cases of the neoplastic entity by 2 independent groups in peer-reviewed journals; any borderline entities included are referred to as “provisional” rather than “emerging.”

In this volume, the “essential and desirable diagnostic criteria” for tumors have been developed considering different resource settings, ensuring diagnostic accuracy while maintaining flexibility. The “essential criteria” are mostly morphology-based, including certain essential, invariably “basic” immunohistochemical (IHC) stains, except for molecularly defined tumors such as sarcomas with BCOR alterations, for which molecular confirmation is considered essential. The “desirable criteria” include an additional diagnostic layer of molecular tests and/or “newer” resources, including surrogate IHC markers. The morphology codes of the updated International Classification of Diseases Oncology, 4th iteration (ICDO-4) have been included for each tumor type and subtype in STB6, ensuring and facilitating more accurate and granular epidemiological data collection.1 Inclusion of tumor types and subtypes is based on better definitions. A tumor type (entity) is a tumor in which multiple parameters (eg, clinical, anatomic, histopathological, and/or molecular features) differ from those of other tumor types. A subtype is recognized as being different in at least one dimension from the main tumor type (clinical, histopathological, or genetic), preferably resulting in a different treatment or outcome. A morphological pattern (no longer called “variant”) is defined as a specific morphology of a given tumor type, important for pathologists to be aware of to facilitate recognition, but not associated with different clinical behavior.

The classification was drafted by 203 editors and authors from 27 countries, representing radiology, medical oncology, genetics, surgical oncology, and orthopedic surgery, in addition to pathology. When appropriate, responsible authors from the previous 5th edition were acknowledged for their contributions, providing the basis for the 6th edition. A consensus was subsequently reached among the expert editorial board. Entities with specific organ-restricted presentation, such as biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma or uterine sarcomas, are excluded from STB6 and instead discussed in other WCT volumes, with the exception of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, as in many centers, these are treated by sarcoma surgeons and medical oncologists and are discussed in sarcoma multidisciplinary teams.

CHANGES IN HISTONE GENE ANNOTATIONS

With regard to the annotation of histone H3 protein nomenclature, a hybrid format is used as a practical compromise that preserves the widely recognized legacy terminology (which uses protein numbering excluding the initiating methionine that is cleaved from the mature protein) while remaining aligned with genetic reporting standards;2 specifically, the 3-letter amino acid description is omitted and the legacy terminology is given in parentheses, for example, H3.3 p.G35W (G34W) in giant cell tumor of bone. For IHC markers targeting histone proteins, we retain the established epitope-based terminology (eg, H3K36M and H3K27me3) without the “p.” prefix and with the conventionally used formatting (eg, H3K27me3 without spaces). These terms refer to protein expression or posttranslational modifications rather than genomic alterations and are therefore most consistent with current diagnostic practice and the published literature.

CHANGES IN THE CLASSIFICATION FRAMEWORK OF STB6

In the 5th edition, separate sections on vascular tumors were included in both the soft tissue and bone tumor chapters, which was mainly driven by their different clinical behavior. Vascular tumors in bone often present as multifocal disease, and epithelioid hemangioma is locally aggressive in bone, while benign in soft tissue. In this edition, these sections were combined to limit redundancy; differences between bone and soft tissue presentation are clearly marked within the respective sections.

STB6 has also taken a different approach to hematolymphoid tumors of the soft tissues and bone, combining them into one chapter. Tumors included in this chapter are hematopoietic neoplasms typically derived from lymphoid, plasma cell, or histiocytic/dendritic cell lineages that arise in nonmucosal extranodal soft tissues or involve bone primarily, often presenting as mass-forming and/or destructive osseous lesions.

In other WHO 6th edition books (released and upcoming), various soft tissue tumor entities are presented in a harmonized way, mostly within a combined chapter of “mesenchymal tumors.”

SOFT TISSUE TUMORS

Significant Changes in Soft Tissue Tumor Classification

Adipocytic Tumors

One new tumor type is introduced as lipoblastoma-like tumor, a benign spindle cell neoplasm of mature and immature adipocytic differentiation sharing morphologic features of spindle cell lipoma, myxoid liposarcoma, and lipoblastoma (Tables 1 and 2).3–6 It has a lobulated growth pattern, delineated by variably sized septa; an admixture of mature adipocytes, univacuolated and/or bivacuolated lipoblasts, and bland spindle cells; with variably myxoid to collagenous matrix and thin-walled plexiform vasculature (Fig. 1A).

TABLE 1.

Summary of New and Dissolved Entities in Soft Tissue and Bone Tumor Classification in STB6

Chapter Newly added tumors Deleted tumors
Soft tissue tumors
 Adipocytic tumors Lipoblastoma-like tumor
 Fibroblastic and myofibroblastic tumors PRRX1-rearranged fibroblastic tumor
Nodular necrotizing fibroblastic tumor
Calcifying fibrous tumor*
Adult fibrosarcoma
 Fibrohistiocytic and synovial tumors Chondroid synoviocytic neoplasm
Keratin-positive giant cell-rich tumor
Deep fibrous histiocytoma
 Pericytic (perivascular) tumors SRF-rearranged myoid neoplasm
 Smooth muscle tumors Inflammatory leiomyosarcoma
 Skeletal muscle tumors Inflammatory rhabdomyoblastic tumor
Fusion-associated spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma†
MYOD1-mutant spindle cell/sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma†
Ectomesenchymoma
 Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Succinate dehydrogenase-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumor
 Tumors of uncertain differentiation OGT-rearranged mesenchymal neoplasm (formerly known as OGT-rearranged acral mesenchymal neoplasm)
Acral fibrochondromyxoid tumor
GLI1-altered mesenchymal tumors
Superficial FET-ETS family neurocristic tumor
Pseudoendocrine sarcoma
NUT-rearranged sarcoma
FET-CREB family epithelioid mesenchymal tumor
PATZ1-rearranged sarcoma‡
Vascular tumors of soft tissue and bone YAP1::TFE3 hemangioendothelioma
Spindle cell hemangioma*
Undifferentiated spindle and small round cell sarcomas NFATC2-rearranged sarcoma‡
Bone tumors
 Osteoclastic giant cell-rich tumors Brown tumor of hyperparathyroidism
 Fibrogenic tumors§ Fibrosarcoma of bone
 Other tumors of bone TFCP2-rearranged rhabdomyosarcoma†
*

Inadvertently omitted in the 2020 WCT.

†

Spindle cell/sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma has been split into these 3 separate entries.

‡

The category round cell sarcomas with EWSR1-non-ETS fusions has been split into NFATC2-rearranged sarcoma and PATZ1-rearranged sarcoma.

§

The family of fibrogenic tumors that was listed under bone tumors in STB5 has been removed in STB6.

TABLE 2.

Key Features of New Entities Included in Soft Tissue and Bone Tumor Classification in STB6

Entity Behavior Section Key molecular Morphology Note
Lipoblastoma-like tumor Benign Adipocytic No fusions Reminiscent of lipoblastoma and myxoid liposarcoma
PRRX1-rearranged fibroblastic tumor Benign Fibroblastic/myofibroblastic PRRX1 rearrangement Paucicellular circumscribed bland spindle cell neoplasm; hyalinized stroma with variably wire-like and ropey collagen; prominent ectatic and irregular vascular spaces
Nodular necrotizing fibroblastic tumor Intermediate Fibroblastic/myofibroblastic YAP1::MAML2 fusion Well-defined nodules of neoplastic cells with surrounding and/or admixed inflammation; tumor cells with copious, eosinophilic-to-amphophilic cytoplasm and enlarged, vesicular nuclei with prominent nucleoli; often central necrosis.
Chondroid synoviocytic neoplasm Intermediate Fibrohistiocytic/synovial FN1 fusions (various partners) Nodules of large, eosinophilic, moderately pleomorphic synoviocytes, surrounded by calcified matrix and cartilage, with sparse histiocytes, osteoclasts, and foamy macrophages. Temporomandibular joint region
Keratin-positive giant cell-rich tumor Intermediate Fibrohistiocytic/synovial HMGA2::NCOR2 Polymorphous population of giant cells (osteoclast-type or Touton), histiocytes, inflammatory cells, and keratin-positive mononuclear cells
SRF-rearranged myoid neoplasm Benign Pericytic (perivascular) SRF gene fusions (various partners) Monomorphic ovoid to spindle cells with fibrillary cytoplasm; arranged in short fascicles; myoid or immature smooth muscle differentiation
Inflammatory rhabdomyoblastic tumor Intermediate Skeletal muscle Near haploidy Spindled or epithelioid cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, variable degrees of nuclear atypia, and low mitotic activity; massive intratumoral lymphohistiocytic infiltration; skeletal muscle differentiation Previously “inflammatory leiomyosarcoma”
Fusion-associated spindle cell rhabdomyosarcomas Malignant Skeletal muscle Fusions due to rearrangement of genes in various combinations (ZFP64, NCOA2, NCOA3, VGLL3, CITED2, and others) Monomorphic spindle cell morphology; expression of at least 2 skeletal muscle markers Split from spindle cell/sclerosing RMS; variable prognosis depending on fusions
MYOD1-mutant spindle cell/sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma Malignant Skeletal muscle MYOD1 mutation p.L122R Spindle cells arranged in fascicles and/or oval to spindle cells with variable amount of sclerotic stroma; MYOD1 typically diffuse and intense Split from spindle cell/sclerosing RMS; aggressive; poor prognosis
OGT-rearranged mesenchymal neoplasm Benign Uncertain differentiation OGT rearrangement Cords or nests of epithelioid cells within a hyalinized or fibromyxoid stroma Acral location
Acral fibrochondromyxoid tumor Benign Uncertain differentiation THBS1 rearrangement (frequently with ADGRF5 or rarely other) Multinodular tumor with fibrous, myxoid or chondroid stroma; fibrovascular septa; bland spindle or round cells; CD34 and ERG positive Acral location
GLI1-altered mesenchymal tumors Variable Uncertain differentiation GLI1 amplification or rearrangement Lobular architecture; nested growth; epithelioid or ovoid cytology; prominent admixed branching capillary vessels
Superficial FET-ETS family neurocristic tumor Benign Uncertain differentiation FET-ETS family fusions (EWSR1 or FUS and FLI1, ERG, ETV1, ETV5, and others) Nests, cords, and trabeculae of small, bland, round to ovoid cells; lack of significant cytologic atypia or tumor necrosis; strong and diffuse expression of SOX10, S100 protein, and CD99
Pseudoendocrine sarcoma Malignant Uncertain differentiation CTNNB1 alteration Mimics neuroendocrine tumor morphologically; lacks expression of keratins and neuroendocrine markers; β-catenin nuclear positivity Paravertebral soft tissues
NUT-rearranged sarcoma Malignant Uncertain differentiation NUT family (mainly NUTM1) rearrangement (various partners) Heterogeneous: pure or mixed population of round-epithelioid-spindle cells with monomorphic nuclei; arranged in sheets, nests or fascicles; variable collagenous-myxoid stroma, NUT positive Highly aggressive
FET-CREB family epithelioid mesenchymal tumor Malignant Uncertain differentiation FET-CREB family fusions (EWSR1 or FUS and CREM, ATF1, or CREB1) Monomorphic epithelioid to round cells; keratin positive Mesothelial-lined cavities
YAP1::TFE3 hemangioendothelioma Malignant Vascular tumors YAP1::TFE3 fusion Solid growth and/or well-formed vascular channels lined by epithelioid endothelial cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm; TFE3 positive Now separated from epithelioid hemangioendothelioma
Brown tumor of hyperparathyroidism Benign Osteoclastic giant cell-rich KRAS mutation Monomorphic spindle cells in a storiform pattern; osteoclastic giant cells; hemorrhage Elevated PTH; regresses with PTH normalization
TFCP2-rearranged rhabdomyosarcoma Malignant Other bone tumors TFCP2 rearrangement (EWSR1::TFCP2 or FUS::TFCP2) Epithelioid, spindle cell, or mixed appearance; skeletal muscle differentiation; co-expression of keratins and ALK Predilection for maxillofacial bones; highly aggressive
FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

(A) Lipoblastoma-like tumor. Bland spindle cells and lipoblasts set in a myxoid stroma with abundant capillaries. (B) PRRX1-rearranged fibroblastic tumor. Bland uniform spindle cells with ovoid nuclei and scant cytoplasm are embedded within a hyalinized stroma. Bright eosinophilic ropey collagen is present, as well as staghorn-shaped vessels.

The diagnostic criteria for atypical spindle cell/pleomorphic lipomatous tumors are clarified in this edition, and they are now separated into atypical spindle cell and atypical pleomorphic subtypes.7 Nonlipogenic tumors within the spectrum of well-differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma are now distinguished based on mitotic rate: owing to survival differences, tumors with up to 4 mitoses per 10 HPF are classified as cellular well-differentiated liposarcoma (atypical lipomatous tumor), while tumors with 5 mitoses or more are classified as dedifferentiated liposarcoma (of note, HPF diameter was not indicated for most of these studies, so the number of mitoses/mm2 cannot be accurately determined).8 The designation “low-grade dedifferentiated liposarcoma” is therefore no longer recommended. More precise grading parameters for myxoid liposarcoma are specified, with explicit distinction between low-grade and higher-grade disease. Higher-grade myxoid liposarcoma is defined by the presence of more cellular areas with round cells exceeding 5% of the tumor, usually accompanied by diminished myxoid matrix.

Fibroblastic and Myofibroblastic Tumors

Two new tumor types are included under this category as PRRX1-rearranged fibroblastic tumor9,10 and nodular necrotizing fibroblastic tumor (see Tables 1 and 2). PRRX1-rearranged fibroblastic tumor is a benign spindle cell neoplasm characterized by PRRX1 rearrangements, most often with NCOA1 (Fig. 1B). While initially suggested to be a subtype of myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma, nodular necrotizing fibroblastic tumor is now recognized as a separate entity specified as a superficial mesenchymal neoplasm composed of epithelioid cells with a brisk inflammatory infiltrate and, in many cases, central necrosis, showing indolent behavior (Fig. 2).11 Most of these lesions harbor YAP1::MAML2 fusions.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Nodular necrotizing fibroblastic tumor. (A) The tumor shows a nodular architecture with a lymphoid rim. (B) The lesion shows a mixture of epithelioid and histiocytoid cells.

There were small changes in nomenclature: EWSR1::SMAD3-positive fibroblastic tumor was modified to SMAD3-rearranged fibroblastic tumor (anticipating the future identification of fusion partners involving other members of the FET family of genes), and the word “pleomorphic” was added to superficial CD34-positive pleomorphic fibroblastic tumor (given the importance of cytologic pleomorphism in both recognition of this tumor type and possible confusion with pleomorphic sarcomas). Calcifying fibrous tumor, inadvertently omitted from the 2020 classification, has been included in STB6. Tumors that resemble sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma with MUC4 negativity and the presence of gene fusions involving YAP1 and KMT2A were co-classified with sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma, recognizing that this may change as more outcome data are collected.12–14 Notably, adult fibrosarcoma has been removed from the classification, as essentially all tumors diagnosed as adult fibrosarcoma in the past can now be reclassified as other sarcoma types using contemporary methods (eg, monophasic synovial sarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, and the fibrosarcomatous variant of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans). However, infantile fibrosarcoma (IFSC) remains in the classification, as it is a distinctive tumor type occurring in children with specific morphological and genetic abnormalities; when IFSC presents in the kidney, the most common and acceptable terminology is “cellular congenital mesoblastic nephroma.” Finally, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) has been moved from tumors of uncertain differentiation (where it was considered a subtype under the umbrella term of “undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma”) to the section on fibroblastic and myofibroblastic tumors, since in many cases the tumor cells appear to show fibroblastic and sometimes myofibroblastic differentiation, despite the “undifferentiated” designation. UPS is still considered a diagnosis of exclusion. Low-grade, uniform and monomorphic spindle cell sarcomas should not be classified as UPS, as they increasingly seem to be resolving into other entities.

Fibrohistiocytic and Synovial Tumors

This chapter’s heading, “fibrohistiocytic tumors” in the 5th edition, is changed to “Fibrohistiocytic and synovial tumors” in STB6.

Two new tumor types are included here as chondroid synoviocytic neoplasm and keratin-positive giant cell-rich tumor (KPGCT) (see Tables 1 and 2). Chondroid synoviocytic neoplasm (a.k.a. “chondroid tenosynovial giant cell tumor” or “calcified chondroid mesenchymal neoplasm”) has a predilection for the temporomandibular joint region, is composed of varying amounts of large, eosinophilic synoviocytes, osteoclastic giant cells, hyaline cartilage, and calcified matrix (Fig. 3), and frequently harbors FN1 rearrangements.15–19 KPGCT is a mesenchymal neoplasm of uncertain lineage, composed of multinucleated giant cells, mixed inflammatory cells, histiocytes, and a small number of keratin-positive mononuclear cells (Fig. 4A, B), harboring HMGA2::NCOR2 fusions.20–23 Deep fibrous histiocytoma has been removed from this classification, since it is a subtype of cutaneous benign fibrous histiocytoma (dermatofibroma), which is included in the WHO classification of skin tumors.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Chondroid synoviocytic neoplasm. Chondroid matrix production within the neoplasm.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

(A) Keratin-positive giant cell-rich tumor. Scattered mononuclear cells with bright eosinophilic cytoplasm, giant cells, and numerous foamy histiocytes. (B) Keratin immunohistochemistry (AE1/AE3) highlights mononuclear cells with a paranuclear pattern. (C) SRF-rearranged myoid neoplasm. Tumor cells with elongated nuclei and dense eosinophilic cytoplasm. (D) Solid sheets of monomorphic ovoid cells with ill-defined cell borders. The cells show fibrillary eosinophilic cytoplasm and uniform nuclei with vesicular chromatin and small nucleoli. (E) Inflammatory rhabdomyoblastic tumor. Epithelioid tumor cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and mild nuclear atypia. (F) The tumor is consistently positive for desmin.

Pericytic (Perivascular) Tumors

A new tumor type, SRF-rearranged myoid neoplasm, has been introduced (see Tables 1 and 2), encompassing a group of predominantly benign tumors exhibiting myoid or immature smooth muscle differentiation and characterized by SRF gene fusions with various partners (Fig. 4C, D).24–26 In the previous 5th edition, a subset of these tumors was described as an “atypical cellular variant” of myofibroma.

Smooth Muscle Tumors

Inflammatory leiomyosarcoma has been omitted from this section, as tumors in this category are now designated as inflammatory rhabdomyoblastic tumor (see the Skeletal Muscle Tumors section).

Skeletal Muscle Tumors

Inflammatory rhabdomyoblastic tumor is introduced in this volume (see Tables 1 and 2), including tumors formerly designated inflammatory leiomyosarcoma. It is defined as an intermediate (rarely metastasizing) neoplasm, characterized by skeletal muscle differentiation, a marked lymphohistiocytic infiltrate (Fig. 4E, F), and near-haploidization.27–30 Malignant progression to rhabdomyosarcoma can be seen and is characterized by high mitotic activity and often necrosis.31 Based on genetic features and differences in clinical behavior, spindle cell/sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma has been split into 3 separate entities: fusion-associated spindle cell rhabdomyosarcomas and MYOD1-mutant spindle cell/sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma are discussed in the soft tissue chapter, while TFCP2-rearranged rhabdomyosarcoma predominantly occurs in bone and is discussed in the bone chapter (see Tables 1 and 2). Fusion-associated spindle cell rhabdomyosarcomas are a heterogeneous group of sarcomas with skeletal muscle differentiation and fascicular spindle cell morphology, defined by recurrent pathognomonic fusions, including, among others, NCOA2 or CITED2, ZFP64, and VGLL3 as fusion partners.32–34 MYOD1-mutant spindle cell/sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma is an aggressive subtype of rhabdomyosarcoma, characterized by fascicular spindle cell and/or sclerosing morphology and MYOD1 p.L122R mutation.31,35–37 Ectomesenchymoma, an extremely rare and predominantly pediatric tumor, was removed as a separate entity from the classification; this lesion is now recognized as a subtype of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma and referred to as “embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma with divergent neuroectodermal differentiation” based on the presence of intermixed neuroblastic elements.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Succinate dehydrogenase-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumor has been recognized as a separate category, given the distinct molecular pathogenesis, implications for possible familial syndromic associations, and differences in clinical behavior.38–42

Chondro-Osseous Tumors

No significant changes were made to this section.

Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors

Epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (EMPNST), previously considered a subtype of MPNST, is now recognized as a separate entity, based on its distinctive epithelioid morphology and specific molecular pathogenesis (loss of SMARCB1 [INI1] expression).43,44

Tumors of Uncertain Differentiation

A large number of recently recognized tumor types are included for the first time in this volume, including OGT-rearranged mesenchymal neoplasm (formerly known as OGT-rearranged acral mesenchymal neoplasm) (Fig. 5),45 acral fibrochondromyxoid tumor (AFCMT),46 GLI1-altered mesenchymal tumors,47–49 superficial FET-ETS family neurocristic tumor,50,51 pseudoendocrine sarcoma,52,53 NUT-rearranged sarcoma,54,55 and FET-CREB family epithelioid mesenchymal tumors (see Tables 1 and 2).56–58 AFCMT is a benign mesenchymal neoplasm of uncertain differentiation arising in acral sites and composed of bland spindle or round cells arranged in a chondromyxoid stroma lobulated by fibrovascular septa (Fig. 6A, B). GLI1-altered mesenchymal tumors have variable clinical behavior, often nested epithelioid morphology and a rich capillary network (Fig. 6C-E), and are driven by fusions or amplification of GLI1. Superficial FET-ETS family neurocristic tumor is an indolent superficial neoplasm that shares similar fusion events with Ewing sarcoma (Fig. 7A, B). Pseudoendocrine sarcoma is a malignant neoplasm of uncertain lineage, predominantly arising in paravertebral soft tissues, morphologically resembling a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (Fig. 7C, D), but lacking expression of keratins and neuroendocrine markers, while harboring CTNNB1 mutations. NUT-rearranged sarcoma is an aggressive malignant mesenchymal neoplasm characterized by heterogeneous morphology (Fig. 7E, F) and gene fusions involving NUTM1. FET-CREB family malignant epithelioid mesenchymal tumors typically involve mesothelial-lined cavities, show epithelioid morphology and epithelial marker expression (Fig. 8), and are characterized by fusions between EWSR1 or FUS genes with members of the CREB family of transcription factors (ATF1, CREB1, and CREM).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

OGT-rearranged mesenchymal neoplasm. A striking feature in some tumors is the cellular myxoid areas alternating with hypocellular zones showing stromal and sometimes perivascular hyalinization, imparting a 2-toned appearance.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

(A) Acral fibrochondromyxoid tumor. A low-magnification view shows a multinodular tumor with chondromyxoid stroma and fibrovascular septa. (B) The tumor is composed of cords and nests of ovoid cells with reniform or round nuclei. (C) GLI1-altered mesenchymal tumor. Neoplastic cells show uniform, ovoid nuclei. Bland examples with a relative paucity of mitotic activity, as seen here, generally follow an indolent clinical course. (D) Perivascular proliferation of neoplastic cells is commonly seen at the tumor periphery. Sometimes this proliferation manifests as small tumor lobules bulging into vascular lumina. (E) S100 protein is expressed in about 30% of tumors, generally those with a nested architecture.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

(A) Superficial neurocristic tumor with an EWSR1::ERG fusion. A trabecular growth pattern is a common feature. (B) Superficial neurocristic tumor with FUS::ETV5 fusion. Diffuse expression of SOX10. (C) Pseudoendocrine sarcoma. Neoplastic cells show pale eosinophilic cytoplasm and monomorphic round nuclei with speckled chromatin. (D) Immunohistochemistry for β-catenin shows strong, diffuse nuclear expression in essentially all cases, consistent with an underlying CTNNB1 mutation. (E) NUT-rearranged sarcoma with MXD4::NUTM1 fusion gene. Prominent rhabdoid phenotype in a colonic sarcoma. (F) Tumor cells typically display uniform nuclear staining for the NUT protein.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

FET-CREB family epithelioid mesenchymal tumor. (A) The neoplastic epithelioid cells have indistinct cell borders and are intermixed with a mixed chronic inflammatory infiltrate, similar to the architecture of angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma. (B) The tumor cells form sheets and tubular structures. The morphology resembles epithelioid mesothelioma. (C) The neoplastic cells demonstrate strong diffuse labeling for keratins 5/6.

The former “emerging” category of NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasms was expanded to kinase-altered spindle cell neoplasms, since it is now recognized that a wide range of kinase gene fusions (as well as point mutations) can be identified in this tumor class.59–61 PATZ1-rearranged sarcoma was introduced into this section; this tumor was included within round cell sarcomas with EWSR1-non-ETS fusions in the 5th edition. These tumors show more morphologic heterogeneity than round cell sarcomas, with round and spindle cell morphology, co-express myoepithelial and skeletal muscle markers, and are characterized by fusions involving EWSR1 and PATZ1. Two entities (atypical fibroxanthoma and ectopic hamartomatous thymoma) were no longer included, and the umbrella term “undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma” is no longer recommended as a miscellaneous category for the group of tumors including undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (moved to (myo)fibroblastic tumors; see above), undifferentiated spindle cell sarcoma, and undifferentiated round cell sarcoma.

VASCULAR TUMORS OF SOFT TISSUE AND BONE

The most significant change in this section is the nomenclature for lesions formerly known as hemangiomas and lymphangiomas, introducing the term vascular anomalies (and lymphatic malformations) to align the classification with the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies (ISSVA).62 Spindle cell hemangioma was inadvertently omitted from the 2020 classification; it has been included in STB6. YAP1::TFE3 hemangioendothelioma has been separated from epithelioid hemangioendothelioma given the differences in histopathology, molecular pathogenesis, and clinical behavior (see Tables 1 and 2).63 YAP1::TFE3 hemangioendothelioma is a malignant vascular neoplasm composed of epithelioid endothelial cells that often display abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and vasoformative features (Fig. 9A), characterized by YAP1::TFE3 fusion. Patients with this tumor type have a more favorable clinical outcome than those with conventional epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.

FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 9

(A) YAP1::TFE3 hemangioendothelioma. Tumor cells arranged in solid nests and sheets with abundant glassy cytoplasm. (B) Brown tumor of hyperparathyroidism. Monomorphic and fibroblast-like spindle cells lacking cytologic atypia admixed with multinucleated giant cells. (C) TFCP2-rearranged rhabdomyosarcoma. A proliferation of spindle cells with distinct nucleoli, a high mitotic index, and mild anisokaryosis. This tumor was associated with a FUS::TFCP2 fusion.

UNDIFFERENTIATED SPINDLE AND SMALL ROUND CELL SARCOMAS

Given the fact that some of these high-grade sarcomas show not only round cell but also spindle cell morphology, the chapter name has been modified accordingly. The tumors included in this section are Ewing sarcoma, NFATC2-rearranged sarcoma, sarcomas with BCOR genetic alterations, and CIC-rearranged sarcoma. As mentioned above, the category round cell sarcomas with EWSR1-non-ETS fusions in the 5th edition has been split into NFATC2-rearranged sarcoma (included in this section)64–66 and PATZ1-rearranged sarcoma (included under tumors of uncertain differentiation in the soft tissue tumors chapter). NFATC2-rearranged sarcoma is a round and spindle cell sarcoma with fibrohyaline stroma, associated with EWSR1::NFATC2 or FUS::NFATC2 fusions.

BONE TUMORS

Significant Changes in Bone Tumor Classification

Chondrogenic Tumors

A multidisciplinary approach for diagnosing these lesions with radiological correlation is emphasized in this edition . In the 5th edition, the terms “atypical cartilaginous tumor” and “chondrosarcoma, grade 1” were further defined: cartilaginous tumors in the appendicular skeleton (long and short tubular bones) are diagnosed as atypical cartilaginous tumors, and the term “chondrosarcoma, grade 1,” is reserved for tumors of the axial skeleton, including the pelvis, scapula, and skull base (flat bones), reflecting the poorer clinical outcome of these tumors at these sites.67 Using different terminology for tumors with identical histomorphology could be considered counterintuitive and controversial. However, this terminology has the dual benefit of being simple in application and reflecting the worse outcome for tumors at these sites where there is a need for more extensive surgery.67 Consequently, this terminology is further endorsed in the current classification. Chondromesenchymal hamartoma of the chest wall, based on the presence of cartilage, is discussed in STB6 under chondrogenic tumors instead of other tumors of bone as in STB5. In STB6, based on recent publications,68 it is now recognized that a very small subset of chondroblastomas is malignant. These tumors show atypia and permeation, occur in the flat bones of older individuals, and are H3K36M positive by IHC.

Osteogenic Tumors

Benign osteogenic tumors include osteoma, osteoid osteoma, and osteoblastoma. Osteosarcoma is the most common malignant bone sarcoma, and multiple types as well as morphological patterns are distinguished based on location as well as morphology. No changes were made in their classification as compared to the 5th edition.

Fibrogenic Tumors

The category of “fibrogenic tumors” has been deleted from the bone tumor classification. Desmoplastic fibroma of bone was moved to “other tumors of bone.” Fibrosarcoma of bone, formerly considered a diagnosis of exclusion, was removed (similar to the soft tissue chapter), since most of these seem to represent dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma or leiomyosarcoma of bone, or rare bone presentations of soft tissue tumors such as solitary fibrous tumor, kinase-altered spindle cell neoplasms, or synovial sarcoma.

Osteoclastic Giant Cell-Rich Tumors

While many bone tumors can contain osteoclasts, they are a defining feature in giant cell tumor of bone, aneurysmal bone cyst, and nonossifying fibroma. Brown tumor of hyperparathyroidism, which was shown to be neoplastic when KRAS mutations were found to be necessary for their development, in addition to elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels,69 is included as a separate entity in STB6. It is defined as a benign spindle cell neoplasm with intermingled osteoclastic giant cells (Fig. 9B), occurring in the context of hyperparathyroidism.

In the previous edition, the occurrence of H3.3 p.G35W (G34W) in bone sarcomas (osteosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma) without associated giant cell tumor histology was acknowledged, suggesting a relationship to giant cell tumor of bone. More recent evidence showed that undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma or osteosarcoma with H3.3 p.G35 (G34) mutations show similar molecular and methylation profiles and thus may represent malignant giant cell tumors of bone.70 However, studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm this association and direct clinical management.

Notochordal Tumors

Notochordal tumors include benign notochordal cell tumor, conventional chordoma (including chondroid chordoma), dedifferentiated chordoma, and poorly differentiated chordoma. No changes were made in their classification as compared to the 5th edition.

Other Tumors of Bone

In this 6th edition, “osteofibrous dysplasia (OFD)-like adamantinoma” has been renamed as “atypical OFD” and is now considered a locally aggressive subtype of OFD. This better reflects the nonmalignant behavior of atypical OFD and should avoid overtreatment of these tumors in young patients.71 The diagnosis can nevertheless be difficult, and interobserver variability is high. TFCP2-rearranged rhabdomyosarcoma is a novel type of high-grade sarcoma with skeletal muscle differentiation (Fig. 9C), characterized by the fusion of TFCP2 to EWSR1 or FUS, with a predilection for the maxillofacial bones.72 This tumor is now included as a new bone tumor entity (see Tables 1 and 2).

HEMATOPOIETIC AND DENDRITIC CELL NEOPLASMS OF SOFT TISSUE AND BONE

Significant Changes in Hematopoietic and Dendritic Cell Neoplasms

Based on the approach taken by STB6 of describing only hematopoietic neoplasms that arise in nonmucosal extranodal soft tissues or involve bone primarily, this chapter includes plasmacytoma; diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (NOS) involving bone; Langerhans cell histiocytosis; Erdheim-Chester disease; follicular dendritic cell sarcoma; and Rosai-Dorfman disease.

Myeloid neoplasms and other medullary proliferations arising within the bone marrow compartment are excluded from this chapter. However, it should also be noted that virtually any hematolymphoid neoplasm may secondarily involve soft tissue and/or bone in the setting of locally extensive or systemic disease. Accordingly, diagnostic evaluation requires integration of morphological, immunophenotypic, and molecular findings with appropriate imaging and clinical assessment to determine the extent of involvement and to establish whether the lesion represents a primary neoplasm of soft tissue or bone.

GENETIC TUMOR SYNDROMES OF SOFT TISSUE AND BONE

Significant Changes in Genetic Tumor Syndromes

Germline (constitutional) pathogenic variants associated with an increased risk of developing soft tissue and/or bone tumors are being identified in a growing list of genes through the application of sequencing technology such as massively parallel DNA sequencing (Table 3). These tumor-predisposing genetic variants often have additional phenotypic consequences, resulting in clinically recognizable syndromes. As germline pathogenic variants are often inherited from one of the parents, it is important to recognize such tumor-predisposing syndromes to screen at-risk individuals in affected families for referral to genetic counseling and implementation of guideline-based surveillance for early cancer detection. While most of these syndromes demonstrate Mendelian inheritance, patients with disorders caused by postzygotic mutations have now been recognized and may need distinct forms of therapy and personalized follow-up. The study of germline tumor-predisposing variants may shed light on the pathogenesis of sporadic tumors.

TABLE 3.

Summary of the Syndromes Presented in Genetic Tumor Syndromes Chapter

Disease/phenotype MIM number* Inheritance Locus Gene Gene/locus MIM number Protein Normal protein function
Enchondromatosis (Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome) 166000 PZ 2q34 IDH1 147700 IDH1 Isocitrate dehydrogenase; conversion of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate; NADPH production and control of mitochondrial redox balance
15q26.1 IDH2 147650 IDH2
Li-Fraumeni syndrome 151623 AD 17p13.1 TP53 191170 TP53 (p53) DNA damage response, “guardian of the genome”
McCune-Albright syndrome 174800 PZ 20q13.32 GNAS 139320 Gsα The alpha subunit of a G protein; signal transduction from the 7 transmembrane to the cAMP second messenger
Multiple osteochondromas 133700 AD 8q24.11 EXT1 608177 EXT1 EXT1 and EXT2 form a hetero-oligomeric complex involved in heparan sulfate production; essential for bone and cartilage formation
133701 AD 11p11.2 EXT2 608210 EXT2
Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 2 150230 8q24.q11-q24.13 A contiguous gene deletion syndrome encompassing EXT1
Potocki-Shaffer syndrome 601224 11p11.2 A contiguous gene deletion syndrome encompassing EXT2
Neurofibromatosis type 1 162200 AD 17q11.2 NF1 613113 Neurofibromin (NF1) Regulation of RAS signaling
Paget disease of bone — AD 17p13.2 PFN1 176610 PFN1 Regulation of NFκB signaling
167250 AD 5q35.3 SQSTM1 601530 SQSTM1 (p62) Regulation of NFκB signaling
602080 AD 18q21.33 TNFRSF11A 603499 RANK Master regulator of osteoclasts
239000 AR 8q24.12 TNFRSF11B 602643 Osteoprotegerin Decoy receptor for TNFSF11/RANKL
616833 AD 1q21.3 ZNF687 610568 ZNF687 Unknown

AD indicates autosomal dominant; AR, autosomal recessive; PZ, postzygotic.

*

OMIM indicates Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (https://www.omim.org).

This chapter provides detailed descriptions of 6 syndromes associated with predisposition to the development of bone or soft tissue tumors (see Table 3). These well-characterized syndromes are included because the tumor manifests in the bone or soft tissues as part of the syndrome at high frequency and is a primary outcome of the genetic alteration underlying that syndrome, often with neoplasm features that are different from those of their sporadic counterparts.

Changes in STB6 related to genetic tumor syndromes include the removal of Rothmund-Thomson syndrome and Werner syndrome from having their own sections in the 5th edition to now only being mentioned in a table in the introduction. Paget disease of bone was selected to move from the introductory table in the 5th edition to currently having an extended section.

CONCLUSION

The 6th edition of the soft tissue and bone tumors volume provides an updated classification and comprehensive overview of tumors arising in soft tissue and bone based on the current best available evidence. It has attempted to meet global requirements while balancing scientific advances.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge support extended by all in the WHO Classification of Tumors (WCT) group and the contributions made by the WCT subcommittees: Genetics and Genomics, Computational Pathology, WCT/LMIC Liaison, Tumor Harmonization, Imaging and Radiology, and Tumor Defining and Clarification. The figures are reprinted with permission from: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Soft tissue and bone tumours. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2026. (WHO classification of tumours series, 6th ed.; vol. 3). Available from: https://tumourclassification.iarc.who.int/chapters/87.

WCT Standing Editorial Board

Wendy Cooper, Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, NSW Health Pathology, Camperdown, Australia

Michael Eden, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Andrew Field, Department of Anatomical Pathology, University of NSW, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia*

Vicky Goh, Departments of Cancer Imaging and Radiology, King’s College London and Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals, London, United Kingdom

Jennelle C. Hodge, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics and IU Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA*

James Kench, Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney, Australia

Joseph Khoury, Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA*

Katia Leite, Department of Urology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Zhiyong Liang, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China

Daichi Maeda, Department of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan

George J. Netto, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA

Bharat Rekhi, Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI) University, Mumbai, India*

Miguel Reyes Múgica, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA

Brian Rous, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Ales Ryska, The Fingerland Department of Pathology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Czechia

Shahin Sayed, Department of Pathology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya

Antonia Sepulveda, Department of Pathology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA

Chanjuan Shi, Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA

Gary Tse, Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

*These standing editorial board members also contributed as editors and authors of the volume and are included as authors of the manuscript.

Footnotes

J.L.H. and J.V.M.G.B. contributed equally to the manuscript as first co-authors.

The content of this article represents the personal views of the authors and does not represent the views of the authors’ employers and associated institutions. Where authors are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article, and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy, or views of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization.

D.C. was financially supported by a senior clinical research fellowship from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen) (1800725N).

Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors have disclosed that they have no significant relationships with, or financial interest in, any commercial companies pertaining to this article.

Contributor Information

Jason L. Hornick, Email: jhornick@partners.org.

Judith V.M.G. Bovee, Email: j.v.m.g.bovee@lumc.nl.

Cristina R. Antonescu, Email: antonesc@mskcc.org.

Daniel Baumhoer, Email: dbaumhoer@mac.com.

David Creytens, Email: david.creytens@uzgent.be.

Angelo P. Dei Tos, Email: angelo.deitos@unipd.it.

Cyril Fisher, Email: cyrilfisher@gmail.com.

Andrew L. Folpe, Email: folpe.andrew@mayo.edu.

Meera Hameed, Email: hameedm@mskcc.org.

Alexander J. Lazar, Email: alazar@mdanderson.org.

Markku Miettinen, Email: miettinenmm@mail.nih.gov.

G. Petur Nielsen, Email: GNIELSEN@mgh.harvard.edu.

Yoshinao Oda, Email: oda.yoshinao.389@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp.

Nasir Ud Din, Email: nd176@yahoo.com;nxu107@med.miami.edu.

Jian Wang, Email: softtissuetumor@163.com.

Akihiko Yoshida, Email: akyoshid@ncc.go.jp.

Jean-Yves Blay, Email: jean-yves.blay@lyon.unicancer.fr.

Johan L. Bloem, Email: jlbloem.voorschoten@xs4all.nl.

Alessandro Gronchi, Email: alessandro.gronchi@istitutotumori.mi.it.

Fredrik Mertens, Email: fredrik.mertens@med.lu.se.

Christina Messiou, Email: Christina.Messiou@rmh.nhs.uk.

Jennelle C. Hodge, Email: jhodge1@iu.edu.

Joseph D. Khoury, Email: jkhoury@unmc.edu.

Andrew Field, Email: andrew.field@svha.org.au.

Bharat Rekhi, Email: rekhi.bharat@gmail.com.

Harshima Wijesinghe, Email: wijesingheh@iarc.who.int.

Pavitratha Puspanathan, Email: puspanathanp@hotmail.com.

Fikret Dirilenoglu, Email: dirilenogluf@iarc.who.int.

Christine Giesen, Email: giesenc@iarc.who.int.

Blanca I. Indave Ruiz, Email: indaveb@iarc.who.int.

Dilani Lokuhetty, Email: samarawickremad@iarc.who.int.

WCT Standing Editorial Board:

Wendy Cooper, Michael Eden, Andrew Field, Vicky Goh, Jennelle C. Hodge, James Kench, Joseph Khoury, Katia Leite, Zhiyong Liang, Daichi Maeda, George J. Netto, Bharat Rekhi, Miguel Reyes Múgica, Brian Rous, Ales Ryska, Shahin Sayed, Antonia Sepulveda, Chanjuan Shi, and Gary Tse

REFERENCES

  • 1. Znaor A, Rous B, Levy GG, et al. The International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 4th Edition (ICD-O-4): an overview. Cancer Epidemiol. 2026;101:102989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Leske H, Dalgleish R, Lazar AJ, et al. A common classification framework for histone sequence alterations in tumours: an expert consensus proposal. J Pathol. 2021;254:109–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Gross JM, Perret R, Coindre JM, et al. Lipoblastoma-like tumor and fibrosarcoma-like lipomatous neoplasm represent the same entity: a clinicopathologic and molecular genetic study of 23 cases occurring in both men and women at diverse locations. Mod Pathol. 2023;36:100246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Anderson WJ, Mariño-Enríquez A, Trpkov K, et al. Expanding the clinicopathologic and molecular spectrum of lipoblastoma-like tumor in a series of 28 cases. Mod Pathol. 2023;36:100252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Mirkovic J, Fletcher CDM. Lipoblastoma-like tumor of the vulva: further characterization in 8 new cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39:1290–1295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Schoolmeester JK, Michal M, Steiner P, et al. Lipoblastoma-like tumor of the vulva: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, fluorescence in situ hybridization and genomic copy number profiling study of seven cases. Mod Pathol. 2018;31:1862–1868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Cordier F, Kleijn TG, Mentzel T, et al. Atypical spindle cell/pleomorphic lipomatous tumour: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical and molecular study of 55 cases, highlighting TP53 gene alterations as a genetic hallmark of atypical pleomorphic lipomatous tumour. Histopathology. 2025;87:197–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Graham DS, Qorbani A, Eckardt MA, et al. Does “low-grade” dedifferentiated liposarcoma exist? The role of mitotic index in separating dedifferentiated liposarcoma from cellular well-differentiated liposarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2023;47:649–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Dehner CA, Torres-Mora J, Thangaiah JJ, et al. PRRX1-rearranged fibroblastic tumors: a clinicopathologic and molecular study of 18 cases including a novel: PRRX1::EP300 fusion. Am J Surg Pathol. 2026;50:31–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Halling GC, McHugh JB, Heider A. PRRX1-rearranged mesenchymal tumor: a case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2025;28:518–522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Dermawan JK, DiNapoli SE, Sukhadia P, et al. Malignant undifferentiated epithelioid neoplasms with MAML2 rearrangements: a clinicopathologic study of seven cases demonstrating a heterogenous entity. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2023;62:191–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kao YC, Lee JC, Zhang L, et al. Recurrent YAP1 and KMT2A gene rearrangements in a subset of MUC4-negative sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020;44:368–377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Puls F, Agaimy A, Flucke U, et al. Recurrent fusions between YAP1 and KMT2A in morphologically distinct neoplasms within the spectrum of low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma and sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020;44:594–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Warmke LM, Ameline B, Fritchie KJ, et al. YAP1::KMT2A-rearranged sarcomas harbor a unique methylation profile and are distinct from sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma and low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma. Virchows Arch. 2025;486:457–477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kao EY, Ardic F, Fadra N, et al. Chondroid synoviocytic neoplasm: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of a distinctive tumor of synoviocytes. Mod Pathol. 2024;37:100598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Oda Y, Izumi T, Harimaya K, et al. Pigmented villonodular synovitis with chondroid metaplasia, resembling chondroblastoma of the bone: a report of three cases. Mod Pathol. 2007;20:545–551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Liu YJ, Wang W, Yeh J, et al. Calcified chondroid mesenchymal neoplasms with FN1-receptor tyrosine kinase gene fusions including FGFR2, FGFR1, MERTK, NTRK1, and TEK: a molecular and clinicopathologic analysis. Mod Pathol. 2021;34:1373–1383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kallen ME, Michal M, Meyer A, et al. Calcified chondroid mesenchymal neoplasm: exploring the morphologic and clinical features of an emergent entity with a series of 33 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2023;47:725–737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Benard C, Le Loarer F, Gomez-Mascard A, et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of a large series of calcified chondroid mesenchymal neoplasms widening their morphologic spectrum. Am J Surg Pathol. 2024;48:991–1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Dehner CA, Baker JC, Bell R, et al. Xanthogranulomatous epithelial tumors and keratin-positive giant cell-rich soft tissue tumors: two aspects of a single entity with frequent HMGA2-NCOR2 fusions. Mod Pathol. 2022;35:1656–1666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Fritchie KJ, Torres-Mora J, Inwards C, et al. Xanthogranulomatous epithelial tumor: report of 6 cases of a novel, potentially deceptive lesion with a predilection for young women. Mod Pathol. 2020;33:1889–1895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Agaimy A, Michal M, Stoehr R, et al. Recurrent novel HMGA2-NCOR2 fusions characterize a subset of keratin-positive giant cell-rich soft tissue tumors. Mod Pathol. 2021;34:1507–1520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Perret R, Malaka Z, Velasco V, et al. Giant cell tumors with HMGA2:: NCOR2 fusion: clinicopathologic, molecular, and epigenetic study of a distinct entity. Am J Surg Pathol. 2023;47:801–811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Karanian M, Kelsey A, Paindavoine S, et al. SRF fusions other than with RELA expand the molecular definition of SRF-fused perivascular tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020;44:1725–1735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Antonescu CR, Sung YS, Zhang L, et al. Recurrent SRF-RELA fusions define a novel subset of cellular variants in the myofibroma/myopericytoma spectrum: a potential diagnostic pitfall with sarcomas with myogenic differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41:677–684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Suurmeijer AJ, Dickson BC, Swanson D, et al. Novel SRF-ICA1L fusions in cellular myoid neoplasms with potential for malignant behavior. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020;44:55–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Odate T, Satomi K, Kubo T, et al. Inflammatory rhabdomyoblastic tumor: clinicopathologic and molecular analysis of 13 cases. Mod Pathol. 2024;37:100359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Martinez AP, Fritchie KJ, Weiss SW, et al. Histiocyte-rich rhabdomyoblastic tumor: rhabdomyosarcoma, rhabdomyoma, or rhabdomyoblastic tumor of uncertain malignant potential? A histologically distinctive rhabdomyoblastic tumor in search of a place in the classification of skeletal muscle neoplasms. Mod Pathol. 2019;32:446–457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Cloutier JM, Charville GW, Mertens F, et al. “Inflammatory Leiomyosarcoma” and “Histiocyte-rich Rhabdomyoblastic Tumor”: a clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and genetic study of 13 cases, with a proposal for reclassification as “Inflammatory Rhabdomyoblastic Tumor”. Mod Pathol. 2021;34:758–769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Lee JC, Li WS, Kao YC, et al. Toward a unifying entity that encompasses most, but perhaps not all, inflammatory leiomyosarcomas and histiocyte-rich rhabdomyoblastic tumors. Mod Pathol. 2021;34:1434–1438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Agaram NP, LaQuaglia MP, Alaggio R, et al. MYOD1-mutant spindle cell and sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma: an aggressive subtype irrespective of age. A reappraisal for molecular classification and risk stratification. Mod Pathol. 2019;32:27–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Dehner CA, Ameline B, Amary F, et al. Clinicopathologic and molecular genetic features of spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma harboring ZFP64::NCOA2/3 fusions: a series of 14 cases. Mod Pathol. 2025;38:100906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Agaimy A, Dermawan JK, Leong I, et al. Recurrent VGLL3 fusions define a distinctive subset of spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma with an indolent clinical course and striking predilection for the head and neck. Genes Chromosom Cancer. 2022;61:701–709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Dehner CA, Broski SM, Meis JM, et al. Fusion-driven spindle cell rhabdomyosarcomas of bone and soft tissue: a clinicopathologic and molecular genetic study of 25 cases. Mod Pathol. 2023;36:100271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Kohsaka S, Shukla N, Ameur N, et al. A recurrent neomorphic mutation in MYOD1 defines a clinically aggressive subset of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma associated with PI3K-AKT pathway mutations. Nat Genet. 2014;46:595–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Rekhi B, Upadhyay P, Ramteke MP, et al. MYOD1 (L122R) mutations are associated with spindle cell and sclerosing rhabdomyosarcomas with aggressive clinical outcomes. Mod Pathol. 2016;29:1532–1540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Tsai JW, ChangChien YC, Lee JC, et al. The expanding morphological and genetic spectrum of MYOD1-mutant spindle cell/sclerosing rhabdomyosarcomas: a clinicopathological and molecular comparison of mutated and non-mutated cases. Histopathology. 2019;74:933–943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Wagner AJ, Remillard SP, Zhang YX, et al. Loss of expression of SDHA predicts SDHA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Mod Pathol. 2013;26:289–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Gill AJ, Chou A, Vilain R, et al. Immunohistochemistry for SDHB divides gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) into 2 distinct types. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34:636–644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Miettinen M, Killian JK, Wang ZF, et al. Immunohistochemical loss of succinate dehydrogenase subunit A (SDHA) in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) signals SDHA germline mutation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37:234–240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Amar L, Pacak K, Steichen O, et al. International consensus on initial screening and follow-up of asymptomatic SDHx mutation carriers. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2021;17:435–444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Dermawan JK, Kelly C, Gao Z, et al. Novel genomic risk stratification model for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) in the adjuvant therapy era. Clin Cancer Res. 2023;29:3974–3985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Schaefer IM, Dong F, Garcia EP, et al. Recurrent SMARCB1 inactivation in epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019;43:835–843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Jo VY, Fletcher CDM. Epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: clinicopathologic analysis of 63 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39:673–682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Lee JC, Hsieh TH, Kao YC. OGT-rearranged acral mesenchymal neoplasms: an emerging entity with an expanding pathologic and molecular spectrum. Am J Surg Pathol. 2021;45:1579–1581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Dehner CA, Pearson H, Almohsen SS, et al. Acral fibrochondromyxoid tumor: a clinicopathologic and molecular genetic study of 37 cases. Mod Pathol. 2024;37:100599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Saoud C, Agaimy A, Dermawan JK, et al. A comprehensive clinicopathologic and molecular reappraisal of GLI1-altered mesenchymal tumors with pooled outcome analysis showing poor survival in GLI1-amplified versus GLI1-rearranged tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2024;48:1302–1317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Antonescu CR, Agaram NP, Sung YS, et al. A distinct malignant epithelioid neoplasm with GLI1 gene rearrangements, frequent S100 protein expression and metastatic potential: expanding the spectrum of pathologic entities with ACTB1/MALAT1/PTCH1-GLI1 fusions. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42:553–560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Agaram NP, Zhang L, Sung YS, et al. GLI1-amplifications expand the spectrum of soft tissue neoplasms defined by GLI1 gene fusions. Mod Pathol. 2019;32:1617–1626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Folpe AL, Tetzlaff MT, Billings SD, et al. Superficial neurocristic EWSR1::FLI1 fusion tumor: a distinctive, clinically indolent, S100 protein/SOX10-positive neoplasm. Mod Pathol. 2024;37:100537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Dehner CA, Warmke LM, Umphress B, et al. Superficial neurocristic FET::ETS fusion tumor: expanding the clinicopathological and molecular genetic spectrum of a recently described entity. Mod Pathol. 2025;38:100656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Papke DJJ, Dickson BC, Sholl L, et al. Pseudoendocrine sarcoma: clinicopathologic analysis of 23 cases of a distinctive soft tissue neoplasm with metastatic potential, recurrent: CTNNB1: mutations, and a predilection for truncal locations. Am J Surg Pathol. 2022;46:33–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Fernández-Pérez J, Pommepuy I, Michal M, et al. Deciphering pseudoendocrine sarcoma: a clinicopathological, molecular, and epigenetic study suggesting biological links with solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas. Mod Pathol. 2025;38:100810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Alsugair Z, Karanian M, Meurgey A, et al. NUTM1/NUTM2B-rearranged intra-abdominal sarcomas: a distinct entity from sarcomas with ESR1 overexpression as a therapeutic target. Mod Pathol. 2025;38:100816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Zhu P, Sun K, Lao IW, et al. Expanding the spectrum of NUTM1-rearranged sarcoma: a clinicopathologic and molecular genetic study of 8 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2024;48:930–941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Shibayama T, Shimoi T, Mori T, et al. Cytokeratin-positive malignant tumor in the abdomen with EWSR1/FUS-CREB fusion: a clinicopathologic study of 8 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2022;46:134–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Agaimy A, Blakely M, Breimer GE, et al. Extra-abdominal and intra-abdominal FET::CREM fusion mesenchymal neoplasms: comparative clinicopathological study of 9 new cases further supporting a distinct potentially aggressive sarcoma and report of novel sites. Virchows Arch. 2024;485:1007–1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Rekhi B, Dermawan JK, Fritchie KJ, et al. EWSR1::ATF1 fusions characterize a group of extra-abdominal epithelioid and round cell mesenchymal neoplasms, phenotypically overlapping with sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcomas, and intra-abdominal FET::CREB fusion neoplasms. Virchows Arch. 2024;485:995–1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Davis JL, Lockwood CM, Stohr B, et al. Expanding the spectrum of pediatric NTRK-rearranged mesenchymal tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019;43:435–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Suurmeijer AJH, Dickson BC, Swanson D, et al. A novel group of spindle cell tumors defined by S100 and CD34 co-expression shows recurrent fusions involving RAF1, BRAF, and NTRK1/2 genes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2018;57:611–621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Kao YC, Suurmeijer AJH, Argani P, et al. Soft tissue tumors characterized by a wide spectrum of kinase fusions share a lipofibromatosis-like neural tumor pattern. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2020;59:575–583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Goldenberg DC, Vikkula M, Penington A, et al. Updated classification of vascular anomalies. A living document from the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies Classification Group. J Vasc Anom. 2025;6:e113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Dermawan JK, Azzato EM, Billings SD, et al. YAP1-TFE3-fused hemangioendothelioma: a multi-institutional clinicopathologic study of 24 genetically-confirmed cases. Mod Pathol. 2021;34:2211–2221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Perret R, Escuriol J, Velasco V, et al. NFATc2-rearranged sarcomas: clinicopathologic, molecular, and cytogenetic study of 7 cases with evidence of AGGRECAN as a novel diagnostic marker. Mod Pathol. 2020;33:1930–1944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Kosemehmetoglu K, Rekhi B, Erdem ZB, et al. Clinicopathological features of three rare EWSR1::NFATC2 sarcomas of bone and soft tissues. Int J Surg Pathol. 2024;32:1275–1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Yau DTW, Chan JKC, Bao S, et al. Bone sarcoma with EWSR1-NFATC2 fusion: sarcoma with varied morphology and amplification of fusion gene distinct from ewing sarcoma. Int J Surg Pathol. 2019;27:561–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Bus MPA, Campanacci DA, Albergo JI, et al. Conventional primary central chondrosarcoma of the pelvis: prognostic factors and outcome of surgical treatment in 162 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100:316–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Fritchie K, Ameline B, Andrei V, et al. Malignant chondroblastoma: an epigenetically distinct subtype of chondroblastoma with a predilection for the skeletally mature. Mod Pathol. 2025;38:100790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Guimarães LM, Gomes IP, Pereira TDSF, et al. KRAS mutations in brown tumor of the jaws in hyperparathyroidism. J Oral Pathol Med. 2020;49:796–802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Saoud C, Benhamida J, Borsu L, et al. Methylation analysis reveals epigenetic congruence between bone sarcomas with H3-3A mutations and malignant giant cell tumors of bone. Mod Pathol. 2025;38:100763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Scholfield DW, Sadozai Z, Ghali C, et al. Does osteofibrous dysplasia progress to adamantinoma and how should they be treated? Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B:409–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Loarer FL, Cleven AHG, Bouvier C, et al. A subset of epithelioid and spindle cell rhabdomyosarcomas is associated with TFCP2 fusions and common ALK upregulation. Mod Pathol. 2020;33:404–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The American Journal of Surgical Pathology are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES