Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 1984 Sep;10(3):128–130. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.3.128

Intended goals and appropriate treatment: an alternative to the ordinary/extraordinary distinction.

C Meyers
PMCID: PMC1374978  PMID: 6502637

Abstract

This article argues that the ordinary/extraordinary distinction has little or no moral value when preservation of life is not given a near absolute status. What is appealed to instead is a determination of both medical and moral duties, upon which appropriate treatment decisions should be based. Included is a partial delineation of those duties.

Full text

PDF
128

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. McCormick R. A. To save or let die. The dilemma of modern medicine. JAMA. 1974 Jul 8;229(2):172–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Strong C. Can fluids and electrolytes be 'extraordinary' treatment? J Med Ethics. 1981 Jun;7(2):83–85. doi: 10.1136/jme.7.2.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES