Skip to main content
PMC home page
Gut logoLink to Gut
. 1994 Oct;35(10):1360–1362. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.10.1360

Forceful dilatation under endoscopic control in the treatment of achalasia: a randomised trial of pneumatic versus metallic dilator.

F Mearin 1, J R Armengol 1, L Chicharro 1, M Papo 1, A Balboa 1, J R Malagelada 1
PMCID: PMC1375004  PMID: 7959186

Abstract

Forceful dilatation under endoscopic control is a well established treatment of achalasia; several different types of dilators can be used. This study prospectively compared the clinical and manometric efficacy of a single dilatation using two different dilators. Forty one patients were randomly assigned to forceful dilatation under endoscopic control with either a pneumatic dilator (n = 17) or a metallic dilator (n = 24). Thereafter, the patients received periodic clinical and manometric evaluation for one year (before and one, six, and 12 months after dilatation). One month after dilatation all but one of the subjects in each group had experienced good to excellent results and their clinical improvement persisted for the one year follow up. Two patients (one in each group) were perforated during the procedure and required surgical treatment. Recovery was uneventful in both cases. Resting lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (mean (SEM)) significantly and similarly decreased after both methods of dilatation (pneumatic dilator: before dilatation 37 (3) mm Hg, one year after dilatation 18 (3) mm Hg; metallic dilator: before dilatation 34 (2) mm Hg, one year after dilatation 17 (3) mm Hg; p < 0.05 for both). It is concluded that in the treatment of achalasia a single dilatation under endoscopic control with either pneumatic or metallic dilator yield comparable clinical and manometric results and similar complication rates. The use of one or other dilator should depend more on the preference and experience of the endoscopist than on the type of device.

Full text

PDF
1360

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BENEDICT E. B. BOUGIENAGE, FORCEFUL DILATATION, AND SURGERY IN THE TREATMENT OF ACHALASIA. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1964 Dec;119:1347–1351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bortolotti M., Labò G. Clinical and manometric effects of nifedipine in patients with esophageal achalasia. Gastroenterology. 1981 Jan;80(1):39–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Csendes A., Braghetto I., Henríquez A., Cortés C. Late results of a prospective randomised study comparing forceful dilatation and oesophagomyotomy in patients with achalasia. Gut. 1989 Mar;30(3):299–304. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.3.299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Csendes A., Braghetto I., Mascaró J., Henríquez A. Late subjective and objective evaluation of the results of esophagomyotomy in 100 patients with achalasia of the esophagus. Surgery. 1988 Sep;104(3):469–475. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Donahue P. E., Samelson S., Schlesinger P. K., Bombeck C. T., Nyhus L. M. Achalasia of the esophagus. Treatment controversies and the method of choice. Ann Surg. 1986 May;203(5):505–511. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198605000-00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fellows I. W., Ogilvie A. L., Atkinson M. Pneumatic dilatation in achalasia. Gut. 1983 Nov;24(11):1020–1023. doi: 10.1136/gut.24.11.1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sauer L., Pellegrini C. A., Way L. W. The treatment of achalasia. A current perspective. Arch Surg. 1989 Aug;124(8):929–932. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410080061009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Shaffer H. A., Jr, Valenzuela G., Mittal R. K. Esophageal perforation. A reassessment of the criteria for choosing medical or surgical therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1992 Apr;152(4):757–761. doi: 10.1001/archinte.152.4.757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Swedlund A., Traube M., Siskind B. N., McCallum R. W. Nonsurgical management of esophageal perforation from pneumatic dilatation in achalasia. Dig Dis Sci. 1989 Mar;34(3):379–384. doi: 10.1007/BF01536259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Utkin V. Resultatsvergleich der Kardiospasmus-Therapie. Zentralbl Chir. 1973 May 18;98(20):743–747. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vantrappen G., Hellemans J., Deloof W., Valembois P., Vandenbroucke J. Treatment of achalasia with pneumatic dilatations. Gut. 1971 Apr;12(4):268–275. doi: 10.1136/gut.12.4.268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Vantrappen G., Hellemans J. Treatment of achalasia and related motor disorders. Gastroenterology. 1980 Jul;79(1):144–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Vantrappen G., Janssens J. To dilate or to operate? That is the question. Gut. 1983 Nov;24(11):1013–1019. doi: 10.1136/gut.24.11.1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES