Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 1988 Dec;14(4):198–199. doi: 10.1136/jme.14.4.198

Resolving arguments about the sanctity of life: a response to Long.

P Singer 1, H Kuhse 1
PMCID: PMC1375583  PMID: 2976837

Abstract

Thomas Long has argued that there is an irreconcilable metaphysical difference between the views of those who, like ourselves, believe that on quality-of-life grounds it is sometimes justifiable to end the life of a severely handicapped infant, and those who, like Paul Ramsey, reject this view. Because of this metaphysical difference, Long considers it impossible for our arguments to refute Ramsey's position. We disagree.

Full text

PDF
198

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Long T. A. Infanticide for handicapped infants: sometimes it's a metaphysical dispute. J Med Ethics. 1988 Jun;14(2):79–81. doi: 10.1136/jme.14.2.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES