Abstract
During the 70s and 80s ethical debate concerning the fetus became intensive. The great advances made in medical technology and research and improvements in prenatal diagnosis as well as in embryological research have led us to believe that the fetus is an individual with recognised claims to protection. In Sweden the aborted fetus has previously been considered merely as a risk-disposal problem, equivalent to dangerous and infected material and there have been no specific guidelines for the treatment of the fetus after abortion. In July 1990 treatment of aborted fetuses was changed with the general guidelines from the National Board of Health and Welfare. The present paper sets out the main contents of the guidelines and discusses the gradually changing views concerning the status of the human fetus in Sweden, as well as the public debate which has been a contributing factor to these changes.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Anderson G., Strong C. The premature breech: caesarean section or trial of labour? J Med Ethics. 1988 Mar;14(1):18–24. doi: 10.1136/jme.14.1.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jennings J. C. Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology: a practitioner's review and opinion. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989 Sep;44(9):656–661. doi: 10.1097/00006254-198909000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lagercrantz H., Forssberg H. Hjärnans funktionella utveckling hos fostret och spädbarnet. Nord Med. 1991;106(10):264–268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strong C., Anderson G. The moral status of the near-term fetus. J Med Ethics. 1989 Mar;15(1):25–27. doi: 10.1136/jme.15.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wennergren Bertil. Human rights of an embryo. J Int Bioethique. 1991 Jan-Mar;2(1):46–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]