Abstract
Contemporary issues such as euthanasia, surrogate motherhood, organ transplantation and gene therapy, which occupy the minds of ethicists in the industrialized countries are, for the moment, irrelevant in most developing countries. There, the ethics of scarcity, sacrifice, cross-cultural research, as well as the activities of multinational companies, are germane. In this article, only the ethics of scarcity and sacrifice will be discussed. Structural adjustment programmes, designed to solve the economic problems of the developing countries, muddied the waters. The dilemma confronting practitioners in developing countries is how to adhere to the basic principles of medical ethics in an atmosphere of hunger, poverty, war and ever-shrinking and often non-existent resources. Nowhere else in the world is the true meaning of scarcity portrayed as vividly as in the developing countries. Consequently, the doctor's clinical freedom may have to be sacrificed by the introduction of an essential drugs list and practice guidelines. The principle of greater good, while appealing, must be carefully interpreted and applied in the developing countries. Thus, while health promotion and disease prevention must be the primary focus, health planners should avoid pushing prevention at the expense of those currently sick. Health care reform in developing countries must not merely re-echo what is being done in the industrialized countries, but must respond to societal needs and be relevant to the community in question.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barer M. L., Evans R. G. Interpreting Canada: models, mind-sets, and myths. Health Aff (Millwood) 1992 Spring;11(1):44–61. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.11.1.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benjamin Walter W. Combining the best of two medical worlds: Canadian universality and United States' freedom. Humane Med. 1992 Oct;8(4):271–285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clinton B. The Clinton health care plan. N Engl J Med. 1992 Sep 10;327(11):804–807. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199209103271112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ityavyar D. A. Health services inequalities in Nigeria. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(11):1223–1235. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90352-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miles S. H., Lurie N., Quam L., Caplan A. Health care reform in Minnesota. N Engl J Med. 1992 Oct 8;327(15):1092–1095. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210083271511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olweny C. L. Quality of life in cancer care. Med J Aust. 1993 Mar 15;158(6):429–432. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1993.tb121844.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olweny C. L. Quality of life in developing countries. J Palliat Care. 1992 Autumn;8(3):25–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Relman A. S. Shattuck Lecture--the health care industry: where is it taking us? N Engl J Med. 1991 Sep 19;325(12):854–859. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199109193251205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sager A. Prices of equitable access: the new Massachusetts health insurance law. Hastings Cent Rep. 1988 Jun-Jul;18(3):21–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steinbrook R., Lo B. The Oregon Medicaid Demonstration Project--will it provide adequate medical care? N Engl J Med. 1992 Jan 30;326(5):340–344. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199201303260511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Summerfield D. Western economics and Third World health. Lancet. 1989 Sep 2;2(8662):551–552. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90665-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wellstone P. D., Shaffer E. R. The American Health Security Act. A single-payer proposal. N Engl J Med. 1993 May 20;328(20):1489–1493. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199305203282013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitaker P. Resource allocation: a plea for a touch of realism. J Med Ethics. 1990 Sep;16(3):129–131. doi: 10.1136/jme.16.3.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams A. Cost-effectiveness analysis: is it ethical? J Med Ethics. 1992 Mar;18(1):7–11. doi: 10.1136/jme.18.1.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]