Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 1995 Jun;21(3):135–140. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.3.135

Artificial hydration and alimentation at the end of life: a reply to Craig.

M Ashby 1, B Stoffell 1
PMCID: PMC1376687  PMID: 7674277

Abstract

Dr Gillian Craig (1) has argued that palliative medicine services have tended to adopt a policy of sedation without hydration, which under certain circumstances may be medically inappropriate, causative of death and distressing to family and friends. We welcome this opportunity to defend, with an important modification, the approach we proposed without substantive background argument in our original article (2). We maintain that slowing and eventual cessation of oral intake is a normal part of a natural dying process, that artificial hydration and alimentation (AHA) are not justified unless thirst or hunger are present and cannot be relieved by other means, but food and fluids for (natural) oral consumption should never be 'withdrawn'. The intention of this practice is not to alter the timing of an inevitable death, and sedation is not used, as has been alleged, to mask the effects of dehydration or starvation. The artificial provision of hydration and alimentation is now widely accepted as medical treatment. We believe that arguments that it is not have led to confusion as to whether or not non-provision or withdrawal of AHA constitutes a cause of death in law. Arguments that it is such a cause appear to be tenuously based on an extraordinary/ordinary categorisation of treatments by Kelly (3) which has subsequently been interpreted as prescriptive in a way quite inconsistent with the Catholic moral theological tradition from which the distinction is derived. The focus of ethical discourse on decisions at the end of life should be shifted to an analysis of care, needs, proportionality of medical interventions, and processes of communication.

Full text

PDF
135

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andrews K. Patients in the persistent vegetative state: problems in their long term management. BMJ. 1993 Jun 12;306(6892):1600–1602. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6892.1600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashby M., Stoffell B. Therapeutic ratio and defined phases: proposal of ethical framework for palliative care. BMJ. 1991 Jun 1;302(6788):1322–1324. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6788.1322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhigjee A. I., Wiley C. A., Wachsman W., Amenomori T., Pirie D., Bill P. L., Windsor I. HTLV-I-associated myelopathy: clinicopathologic correlation with localization of provirus to spinal cord. Neurology. 1991 Dec;41(12):1990–1992. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.12.1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bruera E., Legris M. A., Kuehn N., Miller M. J. Hypodermoclysis for the administration of fluids and narcotic analgesics in patients with advanced cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1990 Aug;5(4):218–220. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(90)90014-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Craig G. M. On withholding nutrition and hydration in the terminally ill: has palliative medicine gone too far? J Med Ethics. 1994 Sep;20(3):139–145. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.3.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dyck A. J. Ethical aspects of care for the dying incompetent. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1984 Sep;32(9):661–664. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1984.tb02256.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fainsinger R., Bruera E. The management of dehydration in terminally ill patients. J Palliat Care. 1994 Autumn;10(3):55–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gillon R. Palliative care ethics: non-provision of artificial nutrition and hydration to terminally ill sedated patients. J Med Ethics. 1994 Sep;20(3):131-2, 187. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.3.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Haines I. E., Zalcberg J., Buchanan J. D. Not-for-resuscitation orders in cancer patients--principles of decision-making. Med J Aust. 1990 Aug 20;153(4):225–229. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1990.tb136867.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ramsey P. The Quinlan decision: five commentaries. Prolonged dying: not medically indicated. Hastings Cent Rep. 1976 Feb;6(1):14–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wilkes Eric. On withholding nutrition and hydration in the terminally ill: has palliative medicine gone too far? A commentary. J Med Ethics. 1994 Sep;20(3):144–145. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.3.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES