Skip to main content
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 1998 Jan;62(1):171–180. doi: 10.1086/301674

Incorporating genotypes of relatives into a test of linkage disequilibrium.

L Excoffier 1, M Slatkin 1
PMCID: PMC1376801  PMID: 9443867

Abstract

Genetic data from autosomal loci in diploids generally consist of genotype data for which no phase information is available, making it difficult to implement a test of linkage disequilibrium. In this paper, we describe a test of linkage disequilibrium based on an empirical null distribution of the likelihood of a sample. Information on the genotypes of related individuals is explicitly used to help reconstruct the gametic phase of the independent individuals. Simulation studies show that the present approach improves on estimates of linkage disequilibrium gathered from samples of completely independent individuals but only if some offspring are sampled together with their parents. The failure to incorporate some parents sharply decreases the sensitivity and accuracy of the test. Simulations also show that for multiallelic data (more than two alleles) our testing procedure is not as powerful as an exact test based on known haplotype frequencies, owing to the interaction between departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and linkage disequilibrium.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (343.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boehnke M. Allele frequency estimation from data on relatives. Am J Hum Genet. 1991 Jan;48(1):22–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chakraborty R., Weiss K. M. Admixture as a tool for finding linked genes and detecting that difference from allelic association between loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(23):9119–9123. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.23.9119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Excoffier L., Slatkin M. Maximum-likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Sep;12(5):921–927. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Guo S. W., Thompson E. A. Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics. 1992 Jun;48(2):361–372. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hill W. G. Estimation of linkage disequilibrium in randomly mating populations. Heredity (Edinb) 1974 Oct;33(2):229–239. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1974.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hill W. G., Weir B. S. Maximum-likelihood estimation of gene location by linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum Genet. 1994 Apr;54(4):705–714. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jorde L. B. Linkage disequilibrium as a gene-mapping tool. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jan;56(1):11–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lange K., Boehnke M. Extensions to pedigree analysis. V. Optimal calculation of Mendelian likelihoods. Hum Hered. 1983;33(5):291–301. doi: 10.1159/000153393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Long J. C., Williams R. C., Urbanek M. An E-M algorithm and testing strategy for multiple-locus haplotypes. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Mar;56(3):799–810. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Slatkin M., Excoffier L. Testing for linkage disequilibrium in genotypic data using the Expectation-Maximization algorithm. Heredity (Edinb) 1996 Apr;76(Pt 4):377–383. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1996.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Slatkin M. Linkage disequilibrium in growing and stable populations. Genetics. 1994 May;137(1):331–336. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.1.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stephens J. C., Briscoe D., O'Brien S. J. Mapping by admixture linkage disequilibrium in human populations: limits and guidelines. Am J Hum Genet. 1994 Oct;55(4):809–824. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES