Abstract
This paper is a response to Peter Allmark's thesis that 'there can be no "caring" ethics'. It argues that the current preoccupation in nursing to define an ethics of care is a direct result of breaking nursing tradition. Subsequent attempts to find a moral basis for care, whether from subjective experimental perspectives such as described by Noddings, or from rational and detached approaches derived from Kant, are inevitably flawed. Writers may still implicitly presuppose a concept of care drawn from the Judaeo-Christian tradition but without explicit recourse to its moral basis nursing is left rudderless and potentially without purpose. The very concept of 'care' cut off from its roots becomes a meaningless term without either normative or descriptive content.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Allmark P. Can there be an ethics of care? J Med Ethics. 1995 Feb;21(1):19–24. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benner P. The role of experience, narrative, and community in skilled ethical comportment. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1991 Dec;14(2):1–21. doi: 10.1097/00012272-199112000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillon R. Caring, men and women, nurses and doctors, and health care ethics. J Med Ethics. 1992 Dec;18(4):171–172. doi: 10.1136/jme.18.4.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]