Abstract
Access to abortion services in the United States continues to decline. It does so not because of significant changes in legislation or court rulings but because fewer and fewer physicians wish to perform abortions and because most states now have "conscientious objection" legislation that makes it easy for physicians to refuse to do so. We argue in this paper that physicians have an obligation to perform all socially sanctioned medical services, including abortions, and thus that the burden of justification lies upon those who wish to be excused from that obligation. That is, such persons should have to show how requiring them to perform abortions would represent a serious threat to their fundamental moral or religious beliefs. We use current California law as an example of legislation that does not take physicians' obligations into account and thus allows them too easily to declare conscientious objection.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bonnie R. J. Healing-killing conflicts. Medical ethics and the death penalty. Hastings Cent Rep. 1990 May-Jun;20(3):12–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daniels N. Duty to treat or right to refuse? Hastings Cent Rep. 1991 Mar-Apr;21(2):36–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]