Abstract
Substantive scientific letter writing is a cost-effective mode of complementing observational and experimental research. The value of such philosophically uncommitted and unsponsored well-balanced scientific activity has been relegated. Critical letter writing entails the abilities to: maintain rational scepticism; refuse to conform in order to explain data; persist in keeping common sense centre-stage; exercise logic to evaluate the biological significance of mathematical figures, including statistics, and the ability to sustain the will to share insights regarding disease mechanisms on an ostensibly lower research platform. During peer review, innovative letter writing may share the occasionally unfortunate fate of innovative research. Rejected scientific letters do not automatically lose copyright. Periodicals with high letter loads will see some valuable contributions wasted, but that is the price for maintaining autonomy in scientific publication. The scientific community is an integrated whole that must respect the rights of authors at all levels. Unauthorised forwarding of rejected letters sets the dangerous precedent of justifying unjust means.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bhopal R. S., Parkin D. W. Authors have rights too. BMJ. 1993 Mar 13;306(6879):716–717. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6879.716-c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bhopal R. S., Tonks A. The role of letters in reviewing research. BMJ. 1994 Jun 18;308(6944):1582–1583. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6944.1582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dewey M. E. Authors have rights too. BMJ. 1993 Jan 30;306(6873):318–320. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6873.318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillett R. Prescriptions for medical research II--Is medical research well served by peer review? BMJ. 1993 Jun 19;306(6893):1672–1675. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6893.1672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillon R. Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ. 1994 Jul 16;309(6948):184–188. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6948.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta V. K. Menstrual migraine is not pathogenetically related to premenstrual syndrome. Cephalalgia. 1994 Dec;14(6):411–412. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1994.1406411.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rennie D. Editors and auditors. JAMA. 1989 May 5;261(17):2543–2545. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith R. Questioning academic integrity. BMJ. 1994 Dec 17;309(6969):1597–1598. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6969.1597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]