Abstract
The discovery that microsatellite repeat expansions can cause clinical disease has fostered renewed interest in testing for age-at-onset anticipation (AOA). A commonly used procedure is to sample affected parent-child pairs (APCPs) from available data sets and to test for a difference in mean age at onset between the parents and the children. However, standard statistical methods fail to take into account the right truncation of both the parent and child age-at-onset distributions under this design, with the result that type I error rates can be inflated substantially. Previously, we had introduced a new test, based on the correct, bivariate right-truncated, age-at-onset distribution. We showed that this test has the correct type I error rate for random APCPs, even for quite small samples. However, in that paper, we did not consider two key statistical complications that arise when the test is applied to realistic data. First, affected pairs usually are sampled from pedigrees preferentially selected for the presence of multiple affected individuals. In this paper, we show that this will tend to inflate the type I error rate of the test. Second, we consider the appropriate probability model under the alternative hypothesis of true AOA due to an expanding microsatellite mechanism, and we show that there is good reason to believe that the power to detect AOA may be quite small, even for substantial effect sizes. When the type I error rate of the test is high relative to the power, interpretation of test results becomes problematic. We conclude that, in many applications, AOA tests based on APCPs may not yield meaningful results.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (415.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bassett A. S., Honer W. G. Evidence for anticipation in schizophrenia. Am J Hum Genet. 1994 May;54(5):864–870. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bassett A. S., Husted J. Anticipation or ascertainment bias in schizophrenia? Penrose's familial mental illness sample. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Mar;60(3):630–637. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonifati V., Fabrizio E., Vanacore N., De Mari M., Meco G. Familial Parkinson's disease: a clinical genetic analysis. Can J Neurol Sci. 1995 Nov;22(4):272–279. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100039469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brinkman R. R., Mezei M. M., Theilmann J., Almqvist E., Hayden M. R. The likelihood of being affected with Huntington disease by a particular age, for a specific CAG size. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 May;60(5):1202–1210. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ewens W. J. Aspects of parameter estimation in ascertainment sampling schemes. Am J Hum Genet. 1982 Nov;34(6):853–865. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heiman G. A., Hodge S. E., Wickramaratne P., Hsu H. Age-at-interview bias in anticipation studies: computer simulations and an example with panic disorder. Psychiatr Genet. 1996 Summer;6(2):61–66. doi: 10.1097/00041444-199622000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heimbuch R. C., Matthysse S., Kidd K. K. Estimating age-of-onset distributions for disorders with variable onset. Am J Hum Genet. 1980 Jul;32(4):564–574. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hodge S. E. Family-size distribution and Ewens' equivalence theorem. Am J Hum Genet. 1985 Jan;37(1):166–177. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hodge S. E., Vieland V. J. The essence of single ascertainment. Genetics. 1996 Nov;144(3):1215–1223. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.3.1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hodge S. E., Wickramaratne P. Statistical pitfalls in detecting age-of-onset anticipation: the role of correlation in studying anticipation and detecting ascertainment bias. Psychiatr Genet. 1995 Spring;5(1):43–47. doi: 10.1097/00041444-199521000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horwitz M., Goode E. L., Jarvik G. P. Anticipation in familial leukemia. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Nov;59(5):990–998. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang J., Vieland V. A new statistical test for age-of-onset anticipation: application to bipolar disorder. Genet Epidemiol. 1997;14(6):1091–1096. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:6<1091::AID-GEPI88>3.0.CO;2-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MORTON N. E. Genetic tests under incomplete ascertainment. Am J Hum Genet. 1959 Mar;11(1):1–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McInnis M. G. Anticipation: an old idea in new genes. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Nov;59(5):973–979. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McInnis M. G., McMahon F. J., Chase G. A., Simpson S. G., Ross C. A., DePaulo J. R., Jr Anticipation in bipolar affective disorder. Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Aug;53(2):385–390. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Myers R. H., Cupples L. A., Schoenfeld M., D'Agostino R. B., Terrin N. C., Goldmakher N., Wolf P. A. Maternal factors in onset of Huntington disease. Am J Hum Genet. 1985 May;37(3):511–523. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paterson A. D., Kennedy J. L., Petronis A. Evidence for genetic anticipation in non-Mendelian diseases. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Jul;59(1):264–268. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vieland V. J., Hodge S. E. Inherent intractability of the ascertainment problem for pedigree data: a general likelihood framework. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jan;56(1):33–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams J. S., Stene J. Assumptions for different ascertainment models in human genetics. Biometrics. 1977 Sep;33(3):523–527. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zatz M., Marie S. K., Passos-Bueno M. R., Vainzof M., Campiotto S., Cerqueira A., Wijmenga C., Padberg G., Frants R. High proportion of new mutations and possible anticipation in Brazilian facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy families. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jan;56(1):99–105. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]