Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To study the accuracy of reviewing ward notes (chart review) as a measure of the quality of care rendered to patients with "Do Not Resuscitate" (DNR) orders. DESIGN: We reviewed the charts of 19 consecutive, competent inpatients with DNR orders for evidence that the staff addressed a broad range of patient care needs called Concurrent Care Concerns (CCCs), such as withholding treatments other than resuscitation itself, and attention to patient comfort needs. We then interviewed the patient, consultant physician, house officer, and primary nurse and compared the ward notes with the understandings of these staff members. SETTING: The medical service of an urban university medical centre. RESULTS: The average number of documented CCCs addressed per DNR order was 1.1. The ward notes generally agreed with the perceptions of patients, house officers, and nurses (% agreement with notes = 79%, 77%, and 82%; kappa = 0.43, 0.40, 0.50). Consultant physicians' understandings were poorly reflected in the ward notes (% agreement = 59%; kappa = 0.18). They overestimated attention to CCCs compared with the notes (P < 0.0001) and with other observers (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Chart review for attention to CCCs accurately reflects the understandings of patients, house officers, and nurses, but consultant physicians report more attention to CCCs than is recorded in the ward notes or understood by other observers. Better communication regarding end-of-life care plans should be encouraged.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Danis M., Southerland L. I., Garrett J. M., Smith J. L., Hielema F., Pickard C. G., Egner D. M., Patrick D. L. A prospective study of advance directives for life-sustaining care. N Engl J Med. 1991 Mar 28;324(13):882–888. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199103283241304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gleeson K., Wise S. The do-not-resuscitate order. Still too little too late. Arch Intern Med. 1990 May;150(5):1057–1060. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jonsson P. V., McNamee M., Campion E. W. The 'Do not resuscitate' order. A profile of its changing use. Arch Intern Med. 1988 Nov;148(11):2373–2375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lo B. Unanswered questions about DNR orders. JAMA. 1991 Apr 10;265(14):1874–1875. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mittelberger J. A., Lo B., Martin D., Uhlmann R. F. Impact of a procedure-specific do not resuscitate order form on documentation of do not resuscitate orders. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Jan 25;153(2):228–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Toole E. E., Youngner S. J., Juknialis B. W., Daly B., Bartlett E. T., Landefeld C. S. Evaluation of a treatment limitation policy with a specific treatment-limiting order page. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Feb 28;154(4):425–432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silverman H. J., Tuma P., Schaeffer M. H., Singh B. Implementation of the patient self-determination act in a hospital setting. An initial evaluation. Arch Intern Med. 1995 Mar 13;155(5):502–510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sulmasy D. P., Geller G., Faden R., Levine D. M. The quality of mercy. Caring for patients with 'do not resuscitate' orders. JAMA. 1992 Feb 5;267(5):682–686. doi: 10.1001/jama.267.5.682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wenger N. S., Oye R. K., Bellamy P. E., Lynn J., Phillips R. S., Desbiens N. A., Kussin P., Youngner S. J. Prior capacity of patients lacking decision making ability early in hospitalization: implications for advance directive administration. The SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Oct;9(10):539–543. doi: 10.1007/BF02599276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]